The Longicorn Beetle Tribe Cerambycini Latreille, 1802 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae) in the Fauna of Asia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Russian Entomol. J. 29(1): 73–82 © RUSSIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2020 The longicorn beetle tribe Cerambycini Latreille, 1802 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae) in the fauna of Asia. 12. Some remarks on the genera Neocerambyx J. Thomson, 1861 (= Bulbocerambyx Lazarev, 2019, syn.n.) and Massicus Pascoe, 1867, stat.resurr. Æóêè-äðîâîñåêè òðèáû Cerambycini Latreille, 1802 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae) ôàóíû Àçèè. 12. Íåêîòîðûå çàìå÷àíèÿ î ðîäàõ Neocerambyx J. Thomson, 1861 (= Bulbocerambyx Lazarev, 2019, syn.n.) è Massicus Pascoe, 1867, stat.resurr. Alexandr I. Miroshnikov 1, 2 À.È. Ìèðîøíèêîâ 1, 2 1 Russian Entomological Society, Krasnodar, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 1 Русское энтомологическое общество, Краснодар, Россия. 2 Sochi National Park, Moskovskaya str. 21, Sochi 354002, Krasnodar region, Russia. 2 Сочинский национальный парк, ул. Московская 21, Сочи 354000, Краснодарский край, Россия. KEY WORDS: Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Cerambycini, Neocerambyx, Massicus, restored genus status, new synonymy, restored and new combinations. КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА: Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Cerambycini, Neocerambyx, Massicus, восстановленный статус рода, новая синонимия, восстановленные названия и новые комбинации. ABSTRACT. Critical remarks on taxonomic and comb.rest., M. sufficiens Holzschuh, 2018, comb.rest., nomenclatural changes to genera Neocerambyx J. Thom- M. punctulipennis Holzschuh, 2018, comb.rest., M. son, 1861 and Massicus Pascoe, 1867 proposed by venustus (Pascoe, 1859), comb.rest., Neocerambyx gi- Lazarev [2019] are given. Some important morpholo- gas (J. Thomson, 1878), comb.rest., N. grandis Gahan, gical differences between these genera are presented. 1891, comb.rest., N. katarinae Holzschuh, 2009, The genus Massicus Pascoe, 1867, stat.resurr. is rees- comb.rest., N. vitalisi Pic, 1923, comb.rest. The fol- tablished from synonyms of Neocerambyx J. Thomson, lowing synonymy is preliminarily established: Neo- 1861. The following new synonymy and new combina- cerambyx vitalisi Pic, 1923 = N. elenae Lazarev, 2019. tions are established: Neocerambyx J. Thomson, 1861 = Bulbocerambyx Lazarev, 2019, syn.n., Neocerambyx РЕЗЮМЕ. Даны критические замечания о таксо- theresae (Pic, 1946), comb.n., N. dierli (Heyrovský, номических и номенклатурных изменениях к родам 1976), comb.n., N. rugicollis (Gressitt, 1948), comb.n. Neocerambyx J. Thomson, 1861 и Massicus Pascoe, The following specific combinations are restored: Mas- 1867, предложенных Лазаревым [2019]. Представле- sicus pascoei (J. Thomson, 1857), comb.rest., M. regius ны некоторые важные морфологические различия Miroshnikov, 2019, comb.rest., M. ivani Miroshnikov, между этими родами. Род Massicus Pascoe, 1867, 2017, comb.rest., M. valentinae Miroshnikov, 2017, stat.resurr. восстановлен из синонимов Neocerambyx comb.rest., M. trilineatus (Pic, 1933), comb.rest., M. J. Thomson, 1861. Установлены следующие новые taiwanus Makihara et Niisato, 2014, comb.rest., M. комбинации и новая синонимия: Neocerambyx J. fryi Gahan, 1890, comb.rest., M. scapulatus Hüdepohl, Thomson, 1861 = Bulbocerambyx Lazarev, 2019, syn.n., 1994, comb.rest., M. intricatus (Pascoe, 1866), Neocerambyx theresae (Pic, 1946), comb.n., N. dierli comb.rest., M. suffusus Gressitt et Rondon, 1970, (Heyrovský, 1976), comb.n., N. rugicollis (Gressitt, How to cite this article: Miroshnikov A.I. 2020. The longicorn beetle tribe Cerambycini Latreille, 1802 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae) in the fauna of Asia. 12. Some remarks on the genera Neocerambyx J. Thomson, 1861 (= Bulbocerambyx Lazarev, 2019, syn.n.) and Massicus Pascoe, 1867, stat.resurr. // Russian Entomol. J. Vol.29. No.1. P.73–82. doi: 10.15298/rusentj.29.1.10 74 A.I. Miroshnikov 1948), comb.n. Восстановлены комбинации следую- It seems extremely strange to me that this author щих видовых названий: Massicus pascoei (J. Thomson, made such drastic taxonomic and nomenclatural chan- 1857), comb.rest., M. regius Miroshnikov, 2019, ges without an extensive and detailed study of the comb.rest., M. ivani Miroshnikov, 2017, comb.rest., M. genera in question and without meticulous considera- valentinae Miroshnikov, 2017, comb.rest., M. trilineatus tions that this issue requires. In my opinion, his conclu- (Pic, 1933), comb.rest., M. taiwanus Makihara et Niisato, sions cannot be viwed positively, and taxonomic chan- 2014, comb.rest., M. fryi Gahan, 1890, comb.rest., M. ges that he proposed make the supraspecific systematics scapulatus Hüdepohl, 1994, comb.rest., M. intricatus of the groups in question more confusing. (Pascoe, 1866), comb.rest., M. suffusus Gressitt et In fact, the type species of the genus Massicus and Rondon, 1970, comb.rest., M. sufficiens Holzschuh, 2018, the species most similar to it differ distinctly from the comb.rest., M. punctulipennis Holzschuh, 2018, type species of the genus Neocerambyx and the species comb.rest., M. venustus (Pascoe, 1859), comb.rest., most similar to it. At the same time, the pretty clear Neocerambyx gigas (J. Thomson, 1878), comb.rest., N. differences in general are also observed between other grandis Gahan, 1891, comb.rest., N. katarinae members of the genera, although in some cases, indivi- Holzschuh, 2009, comb.rest., N. vitalisi Pic, 1923, dual features are in a transitional state. However, the comb.rest. Предварительно установлена следующая general attribution of one form or another (or individual синонимия: Neocerambyx vitalisi Pic, 1923 = N. elenae specimens) can be additionally determined by a combi- Lazarev, 2019. nation of various traits characteristic of each genus. Species of Massicus pascoei (J. Thomson, 1857) Tribe Cerambycini Latreille, 1802 in the fauna of group [containing the following species apart from the Asia, despite a very significant progress in improving its nominotypical, M. regius Miroshnikov, 2019, M. ivani supraspecific classification at the present stage [Mirosh- Miroshnikov, 2017 and M. valentinae Miroshnikov, nikov, 2017, 2018b, 2019b, c; Miroshnikov, Tichý, 2017 (here and further the names of the species groups 2019; Vitali et al., 2017a, b, and others], still includes a and their compositions are given preliminarily)] share number of taxonomically complex and confusing groups the following character states: the anterior coxal cavi- that require a detailed revision. The genera Neoceram- ties externally with a relatively weakly developed trian- byx J. Thomson, 1861 and Massicus Pascoe, 1867, as gular protrusion that in most cases extended into a noted earlier [Miroshnikov, 2017, 2018a], belong to narrow or very narrow, more or less long gap, thereby just such groups. on the lower side of the protrusion at its base is usually Relatively recently, I began to prepare for the revi- formed an almost right or obtuse but sharply expressed sion of these two similar genera and closely related rounded angle, as indicated by arrows in Figs 1–4; the groups. By now, I have examined an extensive material, external apical angle of antennomeres 5–10 or 6–10 including the type specimens of many taxa, as well as with a clear sharp spine or at least very strongly sharpe- described several new species [Miroshnikov, 2017, ned, as in Figs 37–44, thereby a spine is often the most 2018a, 2019a]. However, many questions remain to be developed on antennomeres 8–10 or 9–10 and the short- answered to obtain certain results of the revision. est on antennomere 5 or/and 6; the last antennomere The need for this work was caused solely by Laza- apically sharpened or with a sharp spine, but this struc- rev’s article [2019]. This publication contains the fol- ture in male and female looks somewhat variously (like lowing main results [Lazarev, 2019: 1193–1195]*. Spinidymasius Miroshnikov, 2017 and some others), as * “The species composition of Massicus Pascoe, 1867 and Neocerambyx J. Thomson, 1861 were not generally accepted in scientific community. A precise application of morphological diagnosis for both genera shows its identity (sic!) and necessity of an introduction of a new genus, which is described bellow. … The traditional definitions of Massicus Pascoe, 1867 (type species Cerambyx pascoei J. Thomson, 1857) and Neocerambyx J. Thomson, 1861 (type species Cerambyx paris Wiedemann, 1821) are not adequate. It was generally accepted that males of Neocerambyx have strongly swollen 3rd – 4th antennal joints and 3rd joint not much longer than 4th. In males of Massicus 3rd – 4th antennal joints are not swollen and 3rd joint is much longer than 4th. See, for example a key by Gressitt & Rondon [1970: 55]: Massicus: “Antennal segment 3 much longer than 4; 3 and 4 not usually swollen; prothorax not toothed at side”; Neocerambyx: “Antennal segment 3 not much longer than 4; 3 and 4 often swollen apically or preapically; prothorax often obtuse or bluntly toothed at side”. But according to Hüdepohl [1990: 255] several Neocerambyx have “antennal segment 3 much longer than 4”. In fact males of Neocerambyx paris (Wiedemann, 1821) – the type species of the genus Neocerambyx have thin 3rd – 4th antennal joints and 3rd joint much longer than 4th as in the type species of Massicus. So, Neocerambyx J. Thomson, 1861 = Massicus Pascoe, 1867, syn.n. All species of former Neocerambyx with really strongly swollen 3rd – 4th antennal joints in males and 3rd joint not much longer than 4th must be separated in a new genus Bulbocerambyx gen. n. (type species Neocerambyx grandis Gahan 1891). Besides the new genus is characterized by regularly oval lateral sides of prothorax without lateral tubercles, 1st antennal joint