DOCSLIB.ORG

Constitutional Law – First Semester

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Constitutional Law – First Semester Constitutional Law – First Semester WHAT IS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW? ................................................................................................................................. 3 UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES .................................................................................................................. 3 WHAT IS A REFERENCE CASE? SUPREME COURT ACT RSC 1985 ..................................................................................................... 3 Reference re Secession of Quebec (1998) 2 SCR 217 ..................................................................................................... 3 Reference re Senate Reform (2014) SCC 32 ................................................................................................................... 4 British Columbia v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. [2005] 2 SCR 473 [Criticisms of Unwritten Principles] ..................... 5 BC v Christie 2007 SCC 21 .............................................................................................................................................. 5 CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION ............................................................................................................................. 5 Living tree doctrine: ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Dead tree doctrine: ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 ‘PERSONS CASE’ CONSTITUTION ACT, 1867 S. 24 ....................................................................................................................... 6 Reference re Meaning of the Word ‘Persons’ in Section 24 of the BNA, 1867 ............................................................... 6 Edwards v Canada (Attorney General) [1930] AC 123 (PC) ........................................................................................... 6 CONSTITUTIONAL ARCHITECTURE ................................................................................................................................ 7 National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius (SC of US) 2012 ..................................................................... 7 MODERN CANADIAN FEDERALISM ............................................................................................................................... 8 THE PRIVY COUNCIL’S EARLY FEDERALISM JURISPRUDENCE ............................................................................................................ 8 Citizens Insurance Company v Parsons (1881) 7 AC 96 (PC) .......................................................................................... 8 Russell v The Queen (1882) 7 AC 829 (PC) ..................................................................................................................... 9 Hodge v The Queen (1983) 9 AC 117 PC ...................................................................................................................... 10 THE GREAT DEPRESSION + THE NEW DEAL CASES (P. 167-187) .................................................................................... 11 Reference re The Board of Commerce Act, 1919 + The Combines Fair Prices Act, 1919 [1922] (PC) ........................... 11 Fort Frances Pulp and Paper Company v Manitoba Free Press Company [1923] AC 695 (PC) .................................... 12 Toronto Electric Commissioners v Snider [1925] (PC) .................................................................................................. 12 R. Simeon and I. Robinson, State, Society, and the Development of Canadian Federalism (Toronto, 1990) ............... 13 The Statute Of Westminster (1931) ............................................................................................................................. 13 Hope for POGG? [Aeronautics/Radio] ......................................................................................................................... 13 AG Canada v AG Ontario (Labor Conventions) [1937] (PC) .......................................................................................... 14 AG Canada v AG Ontario (The Employment and Social Insurance Act) [1937] (PC) .................................................... 15 AG British Columbia v AG Canada (The Natural Products Marketing Act) [1937] (PC) [POGG restricted] .................. 16 PITH + SUBSTANCE (P. 207) ......................................................................................................................................... 17 K. Swinton, The Supreme Court and Canadian Federalism: The Laskin-Dickson Years 1990 ....................................... 17 W.R. Lederman, ‘Classification of Laws and the BNA Act’ 1981 .................................................................................. 18 Canadian Western Bank v Alberta [2007] .................................................................................................................... 18 R v Morgentaler [1993] 3 SCR 463, 107 DLR (4th) 537 ................................................................................................ 19 PITH AND SUBSTANCE TEST .................................................................................................................................................... 20 DOUBLE ASPECT DOCTRINE ........................................................................................................................................ 20 Multiple Access Ltd. v McCutcheon [1982] 2 SCR 161 ................................................................................................. 21 ANCILLARY DOCTRINE [OCTOPUS TENTACLE] ............................................................................................................. 22 General Motors of Canada Ltd. City National Leasing [1989] 1 SCR 641 *Sets out ancillary doctrine test; general regulation of trade (s. 91(2)) ...................................................................................................................................... 22 Quebec Attorney General v Lacombe 2010 SCC 38 ...................................................................................................... 23 INTERJURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITY [CASTLE WALLS] .................................................................................................... 24 Canadian Western Bank v The Queen in Right of Alberta [2007] 2 SCR 3 ................................................................... 25 1 Quebec (Attorney General) v Canadian Owners and Pilots Association 2010 SCC 39 [Test for IJI] ............................. 26 Canada v. PHS Community Services Society, 2011 SCC 44 [Insite] ............................................................................... 27 Bank of Montreal v. Marcotte, 2014 SCC 55 ................................................................................................................ 28 OPERABILITY – THE PARAMOUNTCY DOCTRINE .......................................................................................................... 28 Multiple Access Ltd. v McCutcheon [1982] 2 SCR 161 ................................................................................................. 29 Bank of Montreal v Hall [1990] 1 SCR 121 [purposive approach] ................................................................................ 29 Rothmans, Benson, & Hedges Inc. v Saskatchewan [2005] 1 SCR 188 ........................................................................ 30 PEACE, ORDER, AND GOOD GOVERNMENT (P. 323-335) ............................................................................................. 31 Reference re Anti-Inflation Act [1976] 2 SCR 373, 68 DLR (3d) 452 ............................................................................. 31 R v Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd [1988] 1 SCR 401 (p. 323) ....................................................................................... 32 POGG and the Environment: Friends of the Oldman River Society v. Canada (Minister of Transport) [1992] 1 S.C.R. 3. ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 PROVINCIAL POWERS OVER ECONOMIC REGULATION ................................................................................................ 34 Carnation Co Ltd. v Quebec Agricultural Marketing Board [1968] SCR 238, 67 DLR (2d) 1 ......................................... 34 AG Manitoba v Manitoba Egg and Poultry Association ............................................................................................... 35 Re Agricultural Products Marketing Act, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 1198. ................................................................................... 35 REGULATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES ...................................................................................................................... 36 R Simeon and I Robinson, State, Society, and the Development of Canadian Federalism ............. Error! Bookmark not defined. Canadian Industrial Gas and Oil Ltd. v Government of Saskatchewan [1978] 2 SCR 545, 80 DLR (3d) 449 [CIGOL] ... 36 Central Canada Potash Co. Ltd. v Government of Saskatchewan [1979] 1 SCR 42, 88 DLR (3d) 609 .......................... 37 GENERAL REGULATION OF TRADE .............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • De La Volonté Politique À L'interprétation Judiciaire : La Genèse
    UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL DE LA VOLONTÉ POLITIQUE À L'INTERPRÉTATION JUDICIAIRE. LA GENÈSE ET LA MISE EN OEUVRE DU BRITISH NORTH AMERICA ACT DE 1867 THÈSE PRÉSENTÉE COMME EXIGENCE PARTIELLE DU DOCTORAT EN HISTOIRE PAR RACHEL CHAGNON AOÛT 2009 UI\JIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MOI\JTRÉAL Service des bibliothèques Avertissement La diffusion de cette thèse se fait dans le respect des droits de son auteur, qui a signé le formulaire Autorisation de reproduire et de diffuser un travail de recherche de cycles supérieurs (SDU-522 - Rév.01-200G). Cette autorisation stipule que «conformément à l'article 11 du Règlement no 8 des études de cycles supérieurs, [l'auteur] concède à l'Université du Québec à Montréal une licence non exclusive d'utilisation et de publication de la totalité ou d'une partie importante de [son] travail de recherche pour des fins pédagogiques et non commerciales. Plus précisément, [l'auteur] autorise l'Université du Québec à Montréal à reproduire, diffuser, prêter, distribuer ou vendre des copies de [son] travail de recherche à des fins non commerciales sur quelque support que ce soit, y compris l'Internet. Cette licence et cette autorisation n'entraînent pas une renonciation de [la] part [de l'auteur) à [ses) droits moraux ni à [ses) droits de propriété intellectuelle. Sauf entente contraire, [l'auteur) conserve la liberté de diffuser et de commercialiser ou non ce travail dont [il] possède un exemplaire.» REMERCIEMENTS La réalisation de cette thèse a été rendue possible grâce au soutien et aux encouragements de multiples personnes. Je tiens à les remercier de tout cœur et à les rassurer, cet effort a finalement porté fruit! Je désire tout d'abord exprimer ma gratitude à mes deux directeurs de thèse: Jean-Marie Fecteau et Pierre Mackay.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights from Canada for American Constitutional Federalism Stephen F
    Penn State Law eLibrary Journal Articles Faculty Works 2014 Insights from Canada for American Constitutional Federalism Stephen F. Ross Penn State Law Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/fac_works Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Stephen F. Ross, Insights from Canada for American Constitutional Federalism, 16 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 891 (2014). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Works at Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES INSIGHTS FROM CANADA FOR AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL FEDERALISM Stephen F Ross* INTRODUCTION National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius' has again fo- cused widespread public attention on the role of the United States Supreme Court as an active arbiter of the balance of power between the federal government and the states. This has been an important and controversial topic throughout American as well as Canadian constitutional history, raising related questions of constitutional the- ory for a federalist republic: Whatjustifies unelected judges interfer- ing with the ordinary political process with regard to federalism ques- tions? Can courts create judicially manageable doctrines to police federalism, with anything more than the raw policy preferences of five justices as to whether a particular legislative issue is
    [Show full text]
  • Court File No
    COURT OF APPEAL OF ALBERTA Form AP-5 [Rule 14.87] COURT OF APPEAL FILE 1903-0157-AC NUMBER: REGISTRY OFFICE: Edmonton FILED 01 Nov 2019 MIP IN THE MATTER OF THE GREENHOUSE GAS POLLUTION PRICING ACT, SC 2018, c. 12 AND IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE BY THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ALBERTA UNDER THE JUDICATURE ACT, RSA 2000, c. J-2, s. 26 DOCUMENT: FACTUM REFERENCE BY THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ALBERTA Order in Council filed the 20th day of June, 2019 FACTUM OF THE INTERVENER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO Counsel for the Attorney General of Ontario: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO Constitutional Law Branch 720 Bay Street, 4th Floor Toronto, ON M7A 2S9 Josh Hunter / Aud Ranalli Tel: (416) 908-7465 / (416) 389-2604 Fax: (416) 326-4015 Email: [email protected] / [email protected] Counsel for the Attorney General of Alberta: GALL LEGGE GRANT MCLENNAN ROSS LLP DEPARTMENT OF ZWACK LLP 600, 12220 Stony Plain JUSTICE AND SOLICITOR 1199 West Hastings Street Road GENERAL Suite 1000 Edmonton, AB T5N 3Y4 10th Floor, Oxford Tower Vancouver, BC V6E 3T5 10025-102A Avenue Edmonton, AB T5J 2Z2 Peter A. Gall, QC / L. Christine Enns, QC Benjamin Oliphant Ryan Martin / Tel.: (604) 891-1152 Steven Dollansky Tel.: (780) 422-9703 Fax: (604) 669-5101 Tel.: (780) 482-9217 Email:[email protected] Email: [email protected] / Fax: (780) 482-9100 [email protected] Email: [email protected] / [email protected] Counsel for the Attorney General of Canada: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Department of Justice Canada Prairie Regional Office 301-310 Broadway Avenue Winnipeg, MB R3C 0S6 Sharlene Telles-Langdon / Christine Mohr / Mary Matthews / Neil Goodridge / Ned Djordjevic / Beth Tait Tel.: (204) 983-0862 Fax: (204) 984-8495 Email: [email protected] Counsel for the Interveners: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR SASKATCHEWAN 820 - 1874 Scarth St Aboriginal Law Branch Regina, SK S3P 3B3 P.
    [Show full text]
  • "PEACE, ORDER and GOOD GOVERNMENT" RE-EXAMINED BORA LASKIN Osgoode Hall Law School
    "PEACE, ORDER AND GOOD GOVERNMENT" RE-EXAMINED BORA LASKIN Osgoode Hall Law School It is not good husbandry to plow tilled land and it may be equally a display of folly to venture on a re-examination of the judicially determined content of the introductory clause of section 91 of the British North America Act. That clause has been the favourite "whipping-boy" of most of the articles and comments on Canadian constitutional law, and justification for another inquiry into it might, understandably, be required to rest on some substantial ground. But if the amount of literature on Canadian constitutional law is a reflection of the interest which the subject holds for the legal profession, no one who dares to write on it need offer any apology, regardless of the weight of his contribu- tion. Even if extenuation is necessary, there is at least this to be said : (1) the opinion of the Privy Council in Attorney-General of Ontario v. Attorney-General of Canada (Reference re Privy Council Appeals), malting it possible for the Parliament of Canada to vest final and exclusive appellate jurisdiction in respect of all Canadian causes in the Supreme Court of Canada, is an invita- tion to review our constitutional position; and (2) the opinions of the Privy Council in the Canada Temperance Federation case' and in the Japanese Canadians Deportation case 4 contain propo- sitions bearing on the introductory words of section 91 which, on one view, neutralize much of what had been said by the Judicial Committee on the matter in the past twenty-five years and, on another view, merely add to the confusing course of judicial pronouncements on the "peace, order and good govern- ment" clause.
    [Show full text]
  • SIR LYMAN DUFF and the CONSTITUTION by GERALD LEDAIN, Q.C.*
    Osgoode Hall Law Journal Article 3 Volume 12, Number 2 (October 1974) Sir Lyman Duff nda the Constitution Gerald Le Dain Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Article Citation Information Le Dain, Gerald. "Sir Lyman Duff nda the Constitution." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 12.2 (1974) : 261-338. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol12/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. SIR LYMAN DUFF AND THE CONSTITUTION By GERALD LEDAIN, Q.C.* 1. General Sir Lyman Poore Duff, who was on the Supreme Court of Canada for almost thirty-eight years, during the last ten of which he was Chief Justice,1 is generally considered to have been one of Canada's greatest judges. There are many who would say that he was the greatest; there are others who would con- tend that his stature is rivalled, and even surpassed, in some respects, by that of the late Mr. Justice Ivan Cleveland Rand, who was a member of the Supreme Court for a shorter period,2 but whose thinking made a profound impression, particularly in the field of public law. Although there was almost twenty years' difference in their ages, and Rand's career on the Court began as Duff's drew to a close, there was apparently a strong bond of attraction and mutual respect between them.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Interpretation in an Age of Anxiety: a Reconsideration of the Local Prohibition Case
    Constitutional Interpretation in an Age of Anxiety: A Reconsideration of the Local Prohibition Case David Schneiderman* The author argues that late-nineteenth century judicial re- Dans cet article, l'auteur afflime qu'au tournant du sikle, view of the Britit North America Act, 1867 was not limited la rdvision judiciaire de l'Acte de l'Am rique du Nord britanni- solely to the task of determining which level of government was que de 1867 ne se limitait pas exclusivement AIa ddtermination entitled to jurisdictional authority in division of powers disputes. de Ia comptence des paliers de gouvemement dans des liiges Rather, he contends that thejudiciary had serious concerns about touchant la division constitutionnelle des pouvoirs. L'auteur es- the potentially unlimited exercise of legislative power under the time plutbt que les tribunaux 6taient sdrieusement prdoccupds par Canadian Constitution. The design of the Constitution facilitated l'exercice potentiellement illimit d pouvoir lgislatif que con- "energetio federalism", a concept which holds that, together, both f&sait la Constitution canadienne. Le fonctionnement de la levels of government possess plenary and unbounded legislative Constitution a facilit6le <sfdtralisme dnergique>> -notion selon power. laquelle les deux paliers de gouvemement poss~dent, ensemble, The prevailing view in the late-nineteenth century, shared un pouvoir 16gislatifentier et illimit6. by legal thinkers on both sides of the Atlantic, was that govern- Vers la fin du dix-nenvibme sikle, le consensus que par- mental power ought to be circumscribed in deference to the pri- tagealent lesjuristes des deux c6ts de l'Atlantique voulait qu le macy of private property and for the sake of the greater produc- pouvoir gouvernemental soit circonscrit afin de respecter la no- tivity of society.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PRIVY COUNCIL and the SUPREME COURT: a JURISPRUDENTIAL ANALYSIS MARK Macguigan*
    (1966) 4 ALBERTA LAW REVIEW 419 THE PRIVY COUNCIL AND THE SUPREME COURT: A JURISPRUDENTIAL ANALYSIS MARK MacGUIGAN* INTRODUCTION A legal positivist unfamiliar with Canadian constitutional law might well be pardoned for thinking that the British North America Act was the ideal constitution and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council the ideal constitutional court. The constitutional document is ideologically neutral, embodying no lofty statements of ideals and parading no value judgments. In the words of Sir Ivor Jennings, "It contains no metaphysics, no political philosophy, and no party politics." 1 The constitutional court sat out its days in judicial seclusion an ocean removed from the colony-state, with no knowledge of the geographic, economic, social, and political conditions beyond what it might gather from the London news­ papers; it did not know enough about the country to choose sides in Canadian controversies. Lord Haldane was merely giving utterance to the conventional positivistic wisdom when he wrote: "We sit there, per­ fectly impartial; we have no prejudices, either theological or otherwise.":! Such a court, reading such a constitution, should have produced a perfect positivistic product, ninety-nine and forty-four one-hundredths per cent pure. That it did not, is arguably good for the country; that it could not, is incontestably fatal for positivism. By way of contrast, a legal sociologist would wish to point to native judicial bodies that were keenly aware of the social conditions of the nation and contended nobly with the Privy Council for the more socially beneficial rule. But unfortunately for the sociologist, while there is some evidence to support such a thesis, there is far from enough to prove it.
    [Show full text]
  • Attorney General of Ontario
    CA. No.: CACV3239 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR SASKATCHEWAN IN THE MATTER OF THE GREENHOUSE GAS POLLUTION PRICING ACT, Bill C-74, Part 5 AND IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE BY THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL UNDER THE CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS ACT, 2012, SS 2012, c C-29.01. FACTUM OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO Constitutional Law Branch 720 Bay Street, 4th Floor Toronto, ON M7A 2S9 Josh Hunter / Padraic Ryan / Thomas Lipton LSO Nos.: 49037M / 61687J / 60776V Tel.: (416) 326-3840 / (416) 326-0131 / (416) 326-0296 Fax: (416) 326-4015 E-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] / [email protected] Counsel for the Attorney General of Ontario TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I – INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1 PART II – JURISDICTION ............................................................................................. 1 PART III – SUMMARY OF FACTS ............................................................................... 1 PART IV – POINTS IN ISSUE ....................................................................................... 1 PART V - ARGUMENT .................................................................................................. 1 A. The Pith and Substance of the Act Is to Regulate Greenhouse Gas Emissions ... 2 B. Regulating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Is Not a Novel Federal Power Under the National Concern Doctrine ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional. Reform an the Introductory Clause of Section 91 : Residual and Emergency Law-Making Authority
    CONSTITUTIONAL. REFORM AN THE INTRODUCTORY CLAUSE OF SECTION 91 : RESIDUAL AND EMERGENCY LAW-MAKING AUTHORITY K. LYSYK* Vancouver 1 . Introduction . No provision of the British North America Act' has attracted more attention or sparked more controversy among legal commentators than has the introductory clause of section 91, together with its overlay of judicial interpretation . The introductory clause is the enacting portion of section 91 and it provides, with disarming simplicity, that Parliament shall have authority "to make laws for the Peace, Order and good Government of Canada, in relation to all 1979 CanLIIDocs 28 Matters not coming within the Classes of Subjects by this Act assigned exclusively to the Legislatures of the Provinces" . By its terms the clause constitutes a residual category of federal law- making authority. Further, it carries the judicially assigned respon- sibility of providing a constitutional base for the so-called emergency doctrine, the thrust of which is that Parliament may, to meet an emergency, enact laws which in ordinary circumstances would- be beyond its constitutional reach. Both varieties of law-making power-residual and emer- gency-have been the subject of proposals for change in a new or revised Canadian constitution . With respect to residual powers the government of !Quebec has on a number of occasions taken the position that all powers not expressly conferred on the central government ought to be assigned to the provincial legislatures, 2 pointing out that in the case of most other federal constitutions * K. Lysyk, Q.C., of the Faculty of Law; University of British Columbia, Vancouver. ' 1867, 30 & 31 Vict., c.
    [Show full text]
  • Demise and Rise of the Classical Paradigm in Canadian Federalism: Promoting Autonomy for the Provinces and First Nations
    The Demise and Rise of the Classical Paradigm in Canadian Federalism: Promoting Autonomy for the Provinces and First Nations Bruce Ryder* The author explores the possibility of employ- L'auteur analyse l'interprrtation jurispruden- ing Canadian consitutional doctrine to develop tielle des art. 91 et 92 de la Constitution afin de a more flexible approach that would allow for determiner si le cadre constitutionnel actuel greater provincial autonomy and First Nation peut s'accomoder d'une plus grande autono- self-government within the existing scheme of mie des provinces et des peuples autochtones. ss 91 and 92 jurisprudence. Canadian constitu- De Ia doctrine constitutionnelle canadienne se tional doctrine is first interpreted through the drgagent deux conceptions divergentes de la competing models of the classical and modem distribution des pouvoirs l6gislatifs effecture paradigms. The former emphasizes a sharp par ]a Constitution. La conception classique division of powers and has traditionally been congoit les spheres respectives de compdtence used, the author argues, to invalidate legisla- comme distinctes et exclusives; un des motifs tion seen to interfere with the market economy. sous-jacents de cette interpretation tendant i The modem paradigm, on the other hand, rec- restreindre l'exercice du pouvoir 16gislatif ognizes competing jurisdictions and has been aurait &6, selon 'auteur, la protection de used to uphold legislation focusing on morals. l'6conomie de march6. La conception The author then brings this analysis to bear on modeme, par contre, reconnait le chevauche- the issue of provincial autonomy, focusing on ment inevitable des juridictions, et ne le con- the doctrinal writings of Qurbdcois scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    / * f TRENDS IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA IN DETERMINING THE DIVISION OF LEGISLATIVE P01/ERS IN THE BRITISH NORTH AlfERICA ACT 1867 by Arnold D. Armstrong '"*'.*ot<^ Thesis and bibliography to be presented to the Faculty of Arts of the University of Ottawa through the School of Political, Economic and Social Sciences as fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Ottawa, Canada, 195*+ UMI Number: EC56049 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI® UMI Microform EC56049 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page INTRODUCTION 1 TRENDS IN REGARD TO PRINCIPLES OF INTERPRETATION AFFECTING: 1. The Relations of Terms of sections 91 and 92 11 2. The Trenching and Related Doctrines 1*+ 3. The Determination of the Validity of Legislation 26 II TRENDS IN DECISIONS AFFECTING* 1. Taxing Powers and the Credit System 38 2. Property and Civil Rights 53 3o Trade and Commerce in Canada 67 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring "National Dimensions"
    MEASURING "NATIONAL DIMENSIONS" DALE GIBSON* INTRODUCTION The Parliament of Canada has enacted several measures in recent years which depend for their constitutional validity at least to some extent on Parliament's power under the British North America Act to "make laws for the peace, order, and good government of Cana- da."1 The latest and most controversial of these measures is the Anti-Inflation Act.2 Federal pollution-control legislation has also re- lied in part on the "P.O. & G.G." power,3 and no one would be surprised to see it invoked again in the near future to justify federal 1976 CanLIIDocs 42 initiatives in the energy field. It is becoming increasingly important, therefore, to understand the precise meaning of the "P.O. & G.G." clause and the scope of the jurisdiction it confers on Parliament. Although much has been writ- ten on the subject, both judicially and academically,4 some crucial questions remain unresolved. The most important of these is the meaning of the "national dimensions" concept, which, despite wide- ly varied judicial treatment over the years, seems to remain the test for determining when the "P.O. & G.G." power may properly be invoked. The purpose of this comment is to examine the "national diménsions" notion. The "P.O. & G.G." clause is embedded in the opening words of section 91 of the B.N.A.. Act, which is the source of most of the federal Parliament's legislative jurisdiction: "91. It shall be lawful for the Queen, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons, to make laws for the peace, order, and good govern- ment of Canada, in relation to all matters not coming within the classes of subjects by this Act assigned exclusively to the Legislatures of the Provinces ..
    [Show full text]