DOCSLIB.ORG

SPECIAL REPORT (C) Tax Analysts 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SPECIAL REPORT (C) Tax Analysts 2014 SPECIAL REPORT (C) Tax Analysts 2014. All rights reserved. does not claim copyright in any public domain or third party content. tax notes™ Practical Considerations for F. Boilerplate Profits Interests Provisions . 1288 Issuing Profits Interests, Part 2 IV. Practical Considerations ............. 1289 A. Tax Reporting .................. 1289 By Afshin Beyzaee B. Self-Employment Taxes ............ 1289 C. Type of Partnership Interest ......... 1290 D. Profits Interests’ Voting Rights ....... 1290 Afshin Beyzaee is a part- E. Tax Distributions .................1291 ner in the Los Angeles office F. Multiplicity of Partners ............ 1291 of Liner LLP, where he heads the firm’s tax practice. G. Drag-Along Provisions ............ 1292 The author would like to H. Tag-Along Provisions ............. 1294 thank Hatef Behnia and J. I. Valuation of Partnership and Assets ....1294 Nicholson Thomas for their J. Revaluation of Partnership Assets ..... 1295 invaluable comments and K. Top-Up Profits Interests ............ 1296 suggestions. L. Grants Not From Partnership ........ 1296 In this report, Beyzaee M. Disqualification Issues for Afshin Beyzaee discusses how profits inter- Partnership .................... 1297 ests can provide an equity incentive to people N. Proposed Carried Interest Legislation . 1297 providing services to a partnership. The tax treat- V. Probably-Not-Final Thoughts ......... 1297 ment to the recipient is favorable, and there are almost endless possibilities in terms of how they III. Structuring Profits Interests are structured. But their use raises a host of issues, in both implementation and administration, that practitioners should be attuned to. And although There are almost infinite possibilities for structur- profits interests have been sanctioned by the IRS for ing variations on the profits interests, giving prac- some time, many unanswered questions about their titioners and business owners great flexibility in treatment remain. achieving their desired outcomes. This section will provide some examples of how profits interests are This report is being published in two parts. The structured, followed by drafting techniques for first part, published June 9, discussed the current state of the law governing profits interests. This implementing those structures. second part includes practical guidance for estab- A. Structuring Techniques lishing these arrangements. There are many ways to economically structure The information contained herein is of a general profits interests. This section will examine several nature and is based on authorities that are subject to approaches that can be used, but they are by no change. Its applicability to specific situations should be determined through consultation with means exhaustive — creative taxpayers and practi- your tax adviser. This report represents the views of tioners can certainly develop others. the author only and does not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of Liner LLP. 1. Fixed profit share. The most common form of profits interest is probably one in which the holder Copyright 2014 Afshin Beyzaee. is entitled to share in a fixed percentage of any gains All rights reserved. or profits above the value of the partnership at the time the interest is granted, or some higher speci- Table of Contents fied threshold. For example, if the partnership is worth $1 million when the profits interest is III. Structuring Profits Interests .......... 1277 granted, the holder might be entitled to 5 percent of A. Structuring Techniques ............ 1277 all gains and profits exceeding $1 million. Alterna- B. Timing Considerations ............. 1281 tively, the holder might be entitled to 5 percent of all C. Drafting Approaches .............. 1282 gains and profits exceeding $1.5 million or 5 percent D. Issuing Unvested Profits Interests .....1284 of all gains and profits after the existing partners E. Tax Allocations .................. 1286 have received the $1 million plus a preferred return thereon. TAX NOTES, June 16, 2014 1277 COMMENTARY / SPECIAL REPORT This structure would clearly satisfy the safe har- partnership interest received by the waiver partner bor requirement that the profits interest have a zero typically entitles the holder to this kind of catch-up (C) Tax Analysts 2014. All rights reserved. does not claim copyright in any public domain or third party content. liquidation value. The one caveat, however, is that allocation until the amount of the management fee the parties must be confident that the specified ‘‘waived’’ is reached and then a pro rata share of value for allowing the profits interest holder to future gains and profits of the fund is distributed.119 participate is not below the current liquidation This approach can itself take many different value of the partnership.117 forms. For example, the catch-up need not start at 2. Catch-up right. A problem with the kind of the value of the partnership at the time of the grant; profits interest described above is that a service instead, it can apply starting at a higher threshold provider that is promised a fixed percentage of the (perhaps $1.2 million in Example 13). Likewise, the entire partnership for its services is really not get- catch-up does not need to provide the same per- ting a share of the existing value of the partnership. centage of the existing value as the future sharing Although it does not exactly accomplish this goal, percentage. So the holder might get only a 5 percent there is a second approach that attempts to approxi- catch-up on existing capital, together with a 10 mate that result while still qualifying as a profits percent share of future profits, or a 10 percent interest: Allocate the first gains and profits of the catch-up with a 5 percent share of future profits. partnership only to the profits interest holder until As with the first approach, this structure would the holder is economically pari passu with the other clearly satisfy the safe harbor requirement of having partners and only thereafter sharing gains and a zero liquidation value. But here again, even more profits pro rata. so than in the first approach, the parties should be Example 13: Partnership AB is worth $1 million careful not to underestimate the existing value of when a service provider, C, is granted a profits the partnership. Because of the ‘‘juiced’’ catch-up interest. The parties want to give C a one-third rights of the profits interest, the holder of the profits interest in the partnership. This catch-up approach interest would likely be taxed immediately to the would allocate the first $500,000 of gains and profits full extent of any understatement of value because and one-third of all subsequent gains and profits to all that value would accrue to the interest. In C.118 Table 1 shows what C would receive in a Example 13, if the value of the partnership were hypothetical liquidation of the partnership in this really $1.2 million but the parties treated it as only example at various liquidation values: $1 million, the profits interest would have a liqui- dation value of $200,000 upon grant, which amount Table 1 — Example 13 would likely be fully taxable to C at the time of AB Liquidation C’s Share of C’s Percentage grant. Value Proceeds of Value 3. Gross allocations. A more exotic technique is to $500,000 $0 0% start with one of the first two approaches but add a $1,000,000 $0 0% ‘‘gross’’ twist. Tax items arising after the date of $1,200,000 $200,000 16.67% grant (not including built-in gains and losses) are $1,500,000 $500,000 33.33% allocated on a gross basis (that is, allocations of $3,000,000 $1,000,000 33.33% gross items of profits and losses, rather than net profits or losses) among the partners, with gross A prime example of this approach is in connec- profits being allocated to the profits interest holder tion with the management fee waiver technique and gross losses allocated to the other partners until used in many private equity funds. There, the their respective capital accounts match up with the desired economics. The holder of the profits interest will at no time be entitled to share in any value in 117See Section IV.I for a discussion of valuation issues. excess of its capital account. 118The amount of the initial catch-up allocation can be Example 14: Partnership AB has a liquidation calculated using the following formula, where x is the percent- value of $1 million, consisting entirely of cash, age of the partnership to be given to the profits interest holder: Value of Partnership at Grant when a profits interest is granted to a service provider, C. The business goal is that C share in 10 Catch-Up Amount = (1 -x ) percent of all value of the partnership, so this gross The profits interest holder’s share of liquidation proceeds allocation approach is used. In the first year after can be represented by the following Excel formula: = min() max(0, ( l - i )), ( x * l ) where x = the profits interest holder’s share 119For a more detailed analysis of the management fee l = the liquidation value of the partnership at liquidation waiver approach, see Afshin Beyzaee, ‘‘Current Tax Structuring i = the liquidation value of the partnership at the time of the Techniques for Private Equity Funds,’’ 20 J. Tax’n & Reg. of Fin. grant of the profits interest. Inst. 16, 18-20 (May/June 2007). 1278 TAX NOTES, June 16, 2014 COMMENTARY / SPECIAL REPORT Table 2 — Example 14 (C) Tax Analysts 2014. All rights reserved. does not claim copyright in any public domain or third party content. Gross Profit to Profits Interest Gross Losses to Liquidation Profits Interest Percentage of Net Profit (Loss) Partner Other Partners Proceeds Proceeds Proceeds ($10,000) $50,000 ($60,000) $990,000 $50,000 5.05% ($10,000) $99,000 ($109,000) $990,000 $99,000 10.00% $0 $50,000 ($50,000) $1,000,000 $50,000 5.00% $10,000 $30,000 ($20,000) $1,010,000 $30,000 2.97% $10,000 $101,000 ($91,000) $1,010,000 $101,000 10.00% grant, the partnership has no net profits or net One other thing to be careful about is how losses (that is, it breaks even for tax purposes), leveraged distributions are addressed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preparing a Short-Term Cash Flow Forecast
    Preparing a short-term What is a short-term cash How does a short-term cash flow forecast and why is it flow forecast differ from a cash flow forecast important? budget or business plan? 27 April 2020 The COVID-19 crisis has brought the importance of cash flow A short-term cash flow forecast is a forecast of the The income statement or profit and loss account forecasting and management into sharp focus for businesses. cash you have, the cash you expect to receive and in a budget or business plan includes non-cash the cash you expect to pay out of your business over accounting items such as depreciation and accruals This document explores the importance of forecasting, explains a certain period, typically 13 weeks. Fundamentally, for various expenses. The forecast cash flow how it differs from a budget or business plan and offers it’s about having good enough information to give statement contained in these plans is derived from practical tips for preparing a short-term cash flow forecast. you time and money to make the right business the forecast income statement and balance sheet decisions. on an indirect basis and shows the broad categories You can also access this information in podcast form here. of where cash is generated and where cash is spent. Forecasts are important because: They are produced on a monthly or quarterly basis. • They provide visibility of your future cash position In contrast, a short-term cash flow forecast: and highlight if and when your cash position is going to be tight.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital, Profit, and Accumulation: the Perspectives of Karl Marx and Henry George Compared
    11 Matthew Edel Capital, Profit, and Accumulation: The Perspectives of Karl Marx and Henry George Compared The centenary of Progress and Poverty follows by only a few years that of Volume I of Marx's Capital. These two great works of radical economics both appeared in a period of economic turmoil - a long-swing downturn marked by disruption of existing economic relationships, depression, and the rise of new industrial monopolies. Both books pro- posed systems for analysis of economic conditions and advocated revolu- tionary changes. Both were based on the classical writings of David Ricardo, although their systems and proposals differ in many ways. Both won adherents, and both still have them, although Marx has had more impact on policy. In the present paper, I explore some of the differences between the economic analyses of Marx and George. Centenaries are a time for ecumenical dialogue. More important, the modern world's challenges re- quire greater theoretical precision and cross-fertilization of ideas. I shall focus on the treatment of capital, profits, and accumulation in the two theories. The relationship between Marxist economics and the economics of Henry George has often been an antagonistic one, notwithstanding cer- tain common themes. Rival schools often treat each other only with studied ignorance or calumny. Mutual learning and a clarification of fun- damental axioms through confrontation are foregone. 205 206 LAND AS A TAX BASE Both Karl Marx and Henry George were capable of careful and pene- trating analyses of their predecessors in political economy. Whatever the merits of a description of either man as a "post Ricardian" (surely Samuelson's "minor" is unwarranted), both knew and could explain their differences with Ricardo (1821), Malthus (1798), Wakefield (1849), or Mill (1848).
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact Analysis Trans Canada Trail in Ontario
    Economic Impact Analysis Trans Canada Trail in Ontario August 2004 The Ontario Trillium Foundation, an agency of the Ministry of Culture, receives annually $100 million of government funding generated through Ontario's charity casino initiative. PwC Tourism Advisory Services Table of Contents Page # Executive Summary.......................................................................................................i – iv 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................1 2. Trans Canada Trail in Ontario.......................................................................................5 General Description.................................................................................................5 Geographic Segmentation........................................................................................5 Current Condition....................................................................................................6 3. Economic Impact Analysis............................................................................................7 Overview .................................................................................................................7 The Economic Model ..............................................................................................9 4. Study Methodology .....................................................................................................11 Approach ...............................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Reading and Understanding Nonprofit Financial Statements
    Reading and Understanding Nonprofit Financial Statements What does it mean to be a nonprofit? • A nonprofit is an organization that uses surplus revenues to achieve its goals rather than distributing them as profit or dividends. • The mission of the organization is the main goal, however profits are key to the growth and longevity of the organization. Your Role in Financial Oversight • Ensure that resources are used to accomplish the mission • Ensure financial health and that contributions are used in accordance with donor intent • Review financial statements • Compare financial statements to budget • Engage independent auditors Cash Basis vs. Accrual Basis • Cash Basis ▫ Revenues and expenses are not recognized until money is exchanged. • Accrual Basis ▫ Revenues and expenses are recognized when an obligation is made. Unaudited vs. Audited • Unaudited ▫ Usually Cash Basis ▫ Prepared internally or through a bookkeeper/accountant ▫ Prepared more frequently (Quarterly or Monthly) • Audited ▫ Accrual Basis ▫ Prepared by a CPA ▫ Prepared yearly ▫ Have an Auditor’s Opinion Financial Statements • Statement of Activities = Income Statement = Profit (Loss) ▫ Measures the revenues against the expenses ▫ Revenues – Expenses = Change in Net Assets = Profit (Loss) • Statement of Financial Position = Balance Sheet ▫ Measures the assets against the liabilities and net assets ▫ Assets = Liabilities + Net Assets • Statement of Cash Flows ▫ Measures the changes in cash Statement of Activities (Unaudited Cash Basis) • Revenues ▫ Service revenues ▫ Contributions
    [Show full text]
  • Return on Investment. Not Just a For-Profit-Business Concept. Kristen Jones, Manager | Assurance
    views March 2016 Return on Investment. Not Just a For-Profit-Business Concept. Kristen Jones, Manager | Assurance In the for-profit world today, executives and analysts are often discussing a company’s or project’s return on investment or ROI. Indeed, for-profit entities are often judged by their ability to create sufficient ROI for their investors. Calculating ROI for a personal investment is as simple as calculating the ratio of payoff of an investment to cash or capital invested. For example, an investor who buys $1,000 of stock and sells it two years later for $2,000 nets a profit of $1,000, resulting in an ROI of 100 percent (the kind of ROI we would all love to see on our personal investments). ROI does not have to be, nor should it be, limited to a for-profit • Financial Example - Fundraising gala with gross revenue concept. The idea of an ROI can be very valuable in project of $500,000 and expenses of $250,000 generates an ROI evaluation for not-for-profit organizations. Consideration of of 50 percent. ROI will allow a not-for-profit to assess the impact of intended outcomes as compared to the required financial investment. It • Non-Financial Example - Blood donor need and education can help an organization operate more effectively and efficiently awareness activities costing $100,000 resulting in 500 new through improved utilization of staff and volunteer hours, donors generates an ROI of 1 new donor per $200 invested. expanded investor and donor pools and, ultimately, an improved Board members who are affiliated with businesses who use ROI bottom line to allow for expanded mission projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Frs139-Guide.Pdf
    The KPMG Guide: FRS 139, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement i Contents Introduction 1 Executive summary 2 1. Scope of FRS 139 1.1 Financial instruments outside the scope of FRS 139 3 1.2 Definitions 3 2. Classifications and their accounting treatments 2.1 Designation on initial recognition and subsequently 5 2.2 Accounting treatments applicable to each class 5 2.3 Financial instruments at “fair value through profit or loss” 5 2.4 “Held to maturity” investments 6 2.5 “Loans and receivables” 7 2.6 “Available for sale” 8 3. Other recognition and measurement issues 3.1 Initial recognition 9 3.2 Fair value 9 3.3 Impairment of financial assets 10 4. Derecognition 4.1 Derecognition of financial assets 11 4.2 Transfer of a financial asset 11 4.3 Evaluation of risks and rewards 12 4.4 Derecognition of financial liabilities 13 5. Embedded derivatives 5.1 When to separate embedded derivatives from host contracts 14 5.2 Foreign currency embedded derivatives 15 5.3 Accounting for separable embedded derivatives 16 5.4 Accounting for more than one embedded derivative 16 6. Hedge accounting 17 7. Transitional provisions 19 8. Action to be taken in the first year of adoption 20 Appendices 1: Accounting treatment required for financial instruments under their required or chosen classification 21 2: Derecognition of a financial asset 24 3: Financial Reporting Standards and accounting pronouncements 25 1 The KPMG Guide: FRS 139, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement Introduction This KPMG Guide introduces the requirements of the new FRS 139, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
    [Show full text]
  • Asset Allocation for Non-Profits: a Fiduciary's Guidebook
    Russell Research Russell Asset allocation for non-profits: A fiduciary’s guidebook fiduciary’s A Asset allocation non-profits: for Russell Research Asset allocation for non-profits: A fiduciary’s guidebook Introduction by Bob Collie, FIA Chief Research Strategist, Americas Institutional Nothing contained in this material is intended to constitute legal, tax, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and are current as of the date at the beginning of each document. The opinions expressed in this material are not necessarily those held by Russell Investments, its affiliates or subsidiaries. While all material is deemed to be reliable, accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. The information, analysis and opinions expressed herein are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual or entity. Table of contents PAGE # TITLE AUTHOR(S) PUBLISHED 2 Introduction Bob Collie, FIA 4 Once upon a time... D. Don Ezra, FIA September 2012 A historical overview of the development of asset allocation for non-profit organizations 14 Dimensions of difference in nonprofit investment Bob Collie, FIA August 2012 22 Balancing investment and spending decisions for Steve Murray, Ph.D, CFA March 2000 endowments and foundations 30 Non-profit spending rules Steve Murray, Ph.D, CFA October 2011 36 Understanding the effects of spending policies for Yuan-An Fan, Ph.D August 2004 endowments and foundations Steve Murray, Ph.D, CFA 62 Purpose and origin of the 5% payout rule for non-operating Aurea Astro September 2003 private foundations John H.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalism and Society
    Capitalism and Society Volume 4, Issue 2 2009 Article 3 Capitalist Entrepreneurship: Making Profit through the Unmaking of Economic Orders Thorbjørn Knudsen∗ Richard Swedberg† ∗University of Southern Denmark †Cornell University Copyright c 2009 The Berkeley Electronic Press. All rights reserved. Capitalist Entrepreneurship: Making Profit through the Unmaking of Economic Orders Thorbjørn Knudsen and Richard Swedberg Abstract This is a theoretical paper in which we attempt to present an economic and sociological the- ory of entrepreneurship. We start from Schumpeter’s idea in Theory of Economic Development that the economy can be conceptualized as a combination and innovations as new combinations. Schumpeter also spoke of resistance to entrepreneurship. By linking the ideas of combination and resistance, we are in a position to suggest a theory of capitalist entrepreneurship. An existing combination, we propose, can be understood as a social formation with its own cohesion and re- sistance – what may be called an economic order. Actors know how to act; and profit is low and even in these orders. Entrepreneurship, in contrast, breaks them up by creating new ways of doing things and, in doing so, produces entrepreneurial profit. This profit inspires imitators until a new order for how to do things has been established; and profit has become low and even once more. Entrepreneurship is defined as the act of creating a new combination that ends one economic order and clears the way for a new one. The implications of this approach for a number of topics
    [Show full text]
  • Financialization, the Great Recession and the Rate of Profit
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lund University Publications - Student Papers Master programme in Economic History Financialization, the Great Recession, and the rate of profit: profitability trends in the US corporate business sector, 1946-2011 Themistoklis Kalogerakos [email protected] Abstract: The tendential fall in the rate of profit lies in the center of a long-lasting debate among Marxist scholarship on its centrality and empirical relevance in the investigation of structural crises. Without neglecting the financial aspect of the current crisis, which is covered in the vast majority of academic accounts, we try to discover its underlying roots in the entire spectrum of capitalist production in the US, in reference with that debate. Our empirical evidence indicates that the US economy experiences an inability to recover profit rates to the high levels of the first postwar decades on a sustainable basis. It is proposed that this is due to the reluctance of policy makers to allow the vast destruction of unproductive capital, because such a process entails a potential systemic risk for the established socioeconomic and political status-quo. Key words: Falling rate of profit, US economy, structural crisis, Great Recession, Marx, financialization, profitability trends EKHR61 Master thesis (15 credits ECTS) August 2013 Supervisor: Anders Ögren Examiner: Kerstin Enflo Website www.ehl.lu.se Themistoklis Kalogerakos EKHR61 Economic History: First Year 870106-5495 Independent
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3-7 Marginal Analysis in Business and Economics ➤ Marginal Cost, Revenue, and Profit ➤ Application ➤ Marginal Average Cost, Revenue, and Profit
    202 Chapter 3 The Derivative Section 3-7 Marginal Analysis in Business and Economics ➤ Marginal Cost, Revenue, and Profit ➤ Application ➤ Marginal Average Cost, Revenue, and Profit ➤ Marginal Cost, Revenue, and Profit One important use of calculus in business and economics is in marginal analy- sis. In economics, the word marginal refers to a rate of change, that is, to a de- rivative. Thus, if C(x) is the total cost of producing x items, then C¿(x) is called the marginal cost and represents the instantaneous rate of change of total cost with respect to the number of items produced. Similarly, the marginal revenue is the derivative of the total revenue function and the marginal profit is the de- rivative of the total profit function. Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Prentice Hall Section 3-7 Marginal Analysis in Business and Economics 203 DEFINITION Marginal Cost, Revenue, and Profit If x is the number of units of a product produced in some time interval, then total cost = C(x) marginal cost = C¿(x) total revenue = R(x) marginal revenue = R¿(x) total profit = P(x) = R(x) - C(x) marginal profit = P¿(x) = R¿(x) - C¿(x) = (marginal revenue) - (marginal cost) Marginal cost (or revenue or profit) is the instantaneous rate of change of cost (or revenue or profit) relative to production at a given production level. To begin our discussion, we consider a cost function C(x). It is important to remember that C(x) represents the total cost of producing x items, not the cost of producing a single item.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Insight – Definition of Recession – Dec 2008
    DEC 2008 The Definition of ―Recession‖ Although it is commonly thought that a recession is defined as two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth, the truth is more complicated. Recessions are officially declared by a committee of economics professors. The committee’s decisions are typically based on four monthly economic indicators, and it is often hesitant to declare a recession until the evidence is overwhelming. Political considerations may have also contributed to the committee’s reluctance to declare a recession before the November elections. U.S. recessions are It is often said that a recession is defined as ―two consecutive quarters of officially declared negative GDP growth.‖ The truth, however, is much more complicated. In fact, and dated by a U.S. recessions are officially declared and dated by a committee of seven committee of seven economics professors on the Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National economics professors. Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) – a non-profit association of academic economists unaffiliated with the U.S. government. Generally speaking, a recession is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months. Recessions are typically visible in real GDP postings (reported quarterly), and in four other monthly data series: real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales. Importantly, recessions are dated by month, not quarter. This committee of experts focuses on the four monthly economic data series to determine if a recession has occurred. It is not uncommon for the committee to declare a recession if there is a clear downward movement in these monthly indicators, even if quarterly GDP remains positive.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost Revenue & Profit Functions
    COST, REVENUE AND PROFIT FUNCTIONS Cost functions Cost is the total cost of producing output. The cost function consists of two different types of cost: - Variable costs - Fixed costs. Variable cost varies with output (the number of units produced). The total variable cost can be expressed as the product of variable cost per unt and number of units produced. If more items are produced cost is more. Fixed costs normally donot vary with output. In general these costs must be incurred whether the items are produced or not. Cost Function C(x) = F +V풙 C = Total cost F = Fixed cost V = Variable cost Per unit 풙 = No of units produced and sold It is called a linear cost function. Revenue Function Revenue is the total payment received from selling a good or performing a service. The revenue function, R(풙), reflects the revenue from selling “풙” amount of output items at a price of “p” per item. 푹(풙) = 풑풙 Profit Functions The Profit function P(풙) is the difference between the revenue function R(x) and the total cost function C(풙) Thus P(풙) = R(풙) – C(풙) 푷풓풐풇풊풕=푹풆풗풆풏풖풆−푪풐풔풕 Profit = Revenue − Cost P = R − C 1 Examples 1. Assume that fixed costs is Rs. 850, variable cost per item is Rs. 45, and selling price per unit is Rs. 65. Write, i. Cost function ii. Revenue function iii. Profit function i. Cost Function = Variable cost + Fixed cost = 45풙 + 850 ii. Revenue function = 65풙 iii. Profit function = R(풙) – TC(풙) = 65풙 – (45풙+850) = 20풙 – 850 2.
    [Show full text]