An Improved Multislope MUSCL Scheme for Solving Shallow Water

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Improved Multislope MUSCL Scheme for Solving Shallow Water An improved multislope MUSCL scheme for solving shallow water equations on unstructured grids Jiaheng Zhaoa,∗, Ilhan Özgen-Xianb, Dongfang Liangc, Tian Wanga,d, Reinhard Hinkelmanna a Chair of Water Resources Management and Modeling of Hydrosystems, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany b Energy Geosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, United States c Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK d Institute of Water Resources and Hydro-Electric Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Zhao). Abstract This paper describes an improved vector manipulation multislope monotone upstreamcentred scheme for conservation laws (MUSCL) reconstruction for solving the shallow water equations on unstructured grids. This improved MUSCL reconstruction method includes a bigger stencil for the interpolation and saves time for determining the geometric relations compared to the original vector manipulation method, so it is computationally more efficient and straightforward to implement. Four examples involving an analytical solution, laboratory experiments and field-scale measurements are used to test the performance of the proposed scheme. It has been proven that the proposed scheme can provide comparable accuracy and higher efficiency compared to the original vector manipulation method. With the increasing of the number of cells, the advantage of the proposed scheme becomes more apparent. Keywords: Finite volume method, MUSCL scheme, Shallow water, Total variation diminishing, Unstructured grids 1. Introduction Monotone upstream-centred scheme for conservation laws (MUSCL) [1] is a well-known approach for achieving highorder accuracy by data reconstruction for solving hyperbolic partial differential equations. In hydrodynamics, many researchers use the MUSCL scheme to solve the two- dimensional shallow water equations (SWEs) due to its monotonicity and high order accuracy (e.g. [2–5]). The MUSCL-type schemes are an extension of the original Godunov scheme [6]. The variable values along the cell edges are extrapolated from the cell centers, and the reconstructed values are stored at the edges to calculate the Riemann flux across the edges. In order to avoid spurious oscillations and produce physically meaningful results, the numerical scheme should be monotonic. The monotonic numerical scheme can be deduced by examining the total variation, which is defined as an over time decreasing summation of the differences between each adjacent cells. Early TVD schemes were derived on structured grids. Directly applying them on unstructured grids often leads to poor results, because the structured grid provides a simple stencil layout for figuring out the upwind and downwind neighbors. On unstructured grids, the upwind and downwind neighbors are often not located along the perpendicular bisector of the edge. This has to be accounted for in MUSCL reconstructions on unstructured grids. On unstructured grids, TVD MUSCL schemes can be divided into monoslope and multislope methods [2]. The monoslope method was initially presented in [7], which calculates a single slope for the entire cell based on the three immediate neighbors of the cell [8]. The multislope method calculates a slope for each edge based on a three-point stencil. Stencils are set up based on the extrapolation in the upwind direction, and the variable values at the upwind point can be interpolated [9,4], or set to the value at the cell center that is closest to the perpendicular bisector of the considered edge. These methods require significant computational effort to determine the upwind cells and the upwind point in the stencil. A poor choice of the upwind point introduces significant numerical errors, even leading to the loss of the TVD property. As discussed in Hou et al. [5], the multislope method can provide a more efficient and straightforward scheme. Although the multislope method may not provide a piecewise linear slope for the considered cell, the reconstructed values only determine the fluxes across the edges and thus will not influence the conservation law. Therefore, the shape of the reconstructed function inside the cell is not of importance for the FVM [5]. The vector based manipulation method is proposed by Buffard and Clain [2], who provide a very straightforward method on complex unstructured grids, especially suitable for multi-dimensional schemes. Based on the idea of Buffard and Clain [2], Hou et al. [5] proposed a new vector based manipulation multislope method. However, in the authors’ previous work [8], it was found that their scheme [5] does not include enough downwind information for the calculation of the downwind slopes, which may lead to the wrong interpolation. In order to overcome this problem, Zhao et al. [8] calculate the down-slope value in the downwind direction, which increases the robustness and accuracy. A new multislope MUSCL method is devised in this work to improve the accuracy, which includes more stencil points to maintain the monotonicity of the scheme in different flow conditions. This study is based on the framework of unstructured Godunov-type cell- centered FVM. The new MUSCL scheme is compared with the scheme in [8] and analytical analyses. 2. Governing equations and numerical model The two-dimensional shallow water equations (SWEs) are derived from the depth-averaged Navier–Stokes equations. They can be written in the conservative vector form as: with vectors defined as where x and y are the Cartesian coordinates, t is time, q represents the unknown variable vector consisting of h, qx and qy denoting the water depth, unit-width discharges in x- and y-directions, respectively. u, v are defined as depth-averaged velocities in x- and y-directions, respectively; f and g are the flux vectors in x- and y-directions, respectively; s is the source term that includes bed slope and friction contributions, z is the bed elevation and cf is the bed roughness coefficient calculated as gn2 /h1/3, g is the gravitational acceleration. Viscous and turbulent flux terms are neglected in this equation. 2.1. Finite volume discretization of SWEs on unstructured grids The shallow water equations (SWEs) in Eq. (1) can be integrated over a cell as where Ω denotes the area of a cell. Applying the divergence theorem and replacing the boundary integral with a sum over all edges, Eq. (4) becomes herein m is the number of edges, l is the length of the edge, and n = (nx, T ny) , is the unit normal vector pointing in the outward normal direction of the boundary edge, F · n is the flux vector normal to the boundary and can be written as The value of q in cell i is updated using the two-stage explicit Runge–Kutta scheme [10–12], where the value at the next time level in cell i, q n+1 i , is updated by with where κ is a function to represent the updating process to a new time level in the considered cell. ∆t is the time step. For this work, the Courant– Friedrichs–Lewy condition is followed for maintaining the stability, where Rn is the minimum distance from the cell center to the edge, CFL is the Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy number. For explicit time marching algorithms CFL ∈ (0, 1]. In this work, CFL = 0.5 is adopted. 3. Multislope MUSCL reconstruction methods The original Godunov’s theorem used cell-averaged values for calculating the flux and slope source terms. This is first order accurate. In order to get higher accuracy, a linear MUSCL reconstruction is usually used to obtain a second-order accurate scheme. Different ways for calculating slopes lead to different types of MUSCL reconstructions that give different performance (cf., e.g., [13–15,12,16–18]). In the multislope method, slopes are calculated towards each edge individually. As shown in Fig. 1, reconstructed values along the conjuncted edge are represented by and . M is the middle point of the edge, N1−3 are the vertices of the left cell, cell averaged values of the left and right cells are represented by qC and qD1, respectively. Based on the work in [5], can be extrapolated from the cell centroid based on a one-dimensional multislope MUSCL by where is the vector from cell centroid C to edge middle point M, and represent the gradients from N3 to cell center and from the cell center to edge center, respectively. Ψ is the limiting function for restricting the reconstruction scheme to satisfy the total variation diminishing condition. The modified Van Albada’s limiter with two arguments a and b from [19] is adopted in this work, Here, e = 10−12 is used to avoid division by zero. 3.1. Vector manipulation methods The two-dimensional multislope MUSCL schemes can be thought as a one- dimensional reconstruction process along the median line linking the cell center and the edge middle point, with the focus on the method for calculating the upwind and downwind slopes of the cell center along the median line. In the aforementioned literatures, slopes constructed by extrapolating the upwind value along the cell centerlines [4,9,3], and the approximated cell averaged method [20] have been studied. Owing to the accuracy and the unphysical reconstruction point location at the edge, the multislope method still needs to be further investigated. Buffard and Clain [2] proposed the vector manipulation methods, where upwind and downwind slopes can be calculated without the gradient calculation for the cells and the interpolation for the upwind points. Hou et al. [5] simplified the original scheme to make the vector manipulation method more straightforward to implement and enhance the robustness and accuracy. As mentioned in [8], the main idea of the vector manipulation method is to reconstruct the slopes from the cell centers to the slopes along the line passing through the cell center and the edge middle point. It has been shown that the methods from [2] and [5] include too much information from the considered cells and may lead to a wrong reconstruction value along the edge center.
Recommended publications
  • A Truncation Error Analysis of Third-Order MUSCL Scheme for Nonlinear Conservation Laws
    A Truncation Error Analysis of Third-Order MUSCL Scheme for Nonlinear Conservation Laws Hiroaki Nishikawa∗ National Institute of Aerospace, Hampton, VA 23666, USA Abstract This paper is a rebuttal to the claim found in the literature that the MUSCL scheme cannot be third-order accurate for nonlinear conservation laws. We provide a rigorous proof for third-order accuracy of the MUSCL scheme based on a careful and detailed truncation error analysis. Throughout the analysis, the distinction between the cell average and the point value will be strictly made for the numerical solution as well as for the target operator. It is shown that the average of the solutions reconstructed at a face by Van Leer’s κ-scheme recovers a cubic solution exactly with κ = 1/3, the same is true for the average of the nonlinear fluxes evaluated by the reconstructed solutions, and a dissipation term is already sufficiently small with a third-order truncation error. Finally, noting that the target spatial operator is a cell-averaged flux derivative, we prove that the leading truncation error of the MUSCL finite-volume scheme is third-order with κ = 1/3. The importance of the diffusion scheme is also discussed: third-order accuracy will be lost when the third-order MUSLC scheme is used with a wrong fourth-order diffusion scheme for convection-diffusion problems. Third-order accuracy is verified by thorough numerical experiments for both steady and unsteady problems. This paper is intended to serve as a reference to clarify confusions about third-order accuracy of the MUSCL scheme, as a guide to correctly analyze and verify the MUSCL scheme for nonlinear equations, and eventually as the basis for clarifying third-order unstructured-grid schemes in a subsequent paper.
    [Show full text]
  • The QUICK Scheme Is a Third-Order Finite-Volume Scheme with Point
    The QUICK Scheme is a Third-Order Finite-Volume Scheme with Point-Valued Numerical Solutions Hiroaki Nishikawa∗ National Institute of Aerospace, Hampton, VA 23666, USA June 30, 2020 Abstract In this paper, we resolve the ever-present confusion over the QUICK scheme: it is a second-order scheme or a third-order scheme. The QUICK scheme, as proposed in the original reference [B. P. Leonard, Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng., 19, (1979), 59-98], is a third-order (not second-order) finite-volume scheme for the integral form of a general nonlinear conservation law with point-valued solutions stored at cell centers as numerical solutions. Third-order accuracy is proved by a careful and detailed truncation error analysis and demonstrated by a series of thorough numerical tests. The QUICK scheme requires a careful spatial discretization of a time derivative to preserve third-order accuracy for unsteady problems. Two techniques are discussed, including the QUICKEST scheme of Leonard. Discussions are given on how the QUICK scheme is mistakenly found to be second-order accurate. This paper is intended to serve as a reference to clarify any confusion about third-order accuracy of the QUICK scheme and also as the basis for clarifying economical high-order unstructured- grid schemes as we will discuss in a subsequent paper. 1 Introduction This paper is a sequel to the previous paper [1], where we discussed the third-order MUSCL scheme. The main motivation behind this work is to clarify some economical high-order unstructured-grid finite-volume schemes used in practical computational fluid dynamics solvers but largely confused in their mechanisms to achieve third- and possibly higher-order accuracy (e.g., third-order U-MUSCL with κ =1/2 [2], κ =1/3 [3, 4], κ = 0 [5, 6]).
    [Show full text]
  • Finite-Volume Simulations of Maxwell's Equations On
    Finite-Volume Simulations of Maxwell's Equations on Unstructured Grids Ian Jeffrey PhD Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Copyright c 2011 by Ian Jeffrey Abstract Herein a fully parallel, upwind and flux-split Finite-Volume Time-Domain (FVTD) numerical engine for solving Maxwell's Equations on unstructured grids is developed. The required background theory for solving Maxwell's Equations using FVTD is given in sufficient detail, including a description of both the temporal and spatial approx- imations used. The details of the local-time stepping strategy of Fumeaux et al. is included. A global mesh-truncation scheme using field integration over a Huygens' surface is also presented. The capabilities of the FVTD algorithm are augmented with thin-wire and subcell circuit models that permit very flexible and accurate simulations of circuit-driven wire structures. Numerical and experimental validation shows that the proposed models have a wide-range of applications. Specifically, it appears that the thin-wire and subcell circuit models may be very well suited to the simulation of radio-frequency coils used in magnetic resonance imaging systems. A parallelization scheme for the volumetric field solver, combined with the local-time stepping, global mesh-truncation and subcell models is developed that theoretically provides both linear time- and memory scaling in a distributed parallel environment. Finally, the FVTD code is converted to the frequency domain and the possibility of using different flux-reconstruction schemes to improve the iterative convergence of the Finite-Volume Frequency-Domain algorithm is investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Méthode De Décomposition De Domaine Avec Adaptation De
    UNIVERSIT E´ PARIS 13 No attribu´epar la biblioth`eque TH ESE` pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSIT E´ PARIS 13 Discipline: Math´ematiques Appliqu´ees Laboratoire d’accueil: ONERA - Le centre fran¸cais de recherche a´erospatiale Pr´esent´ee et soutenue publiquement le 19 d´ecembre 2014 par Oana Alexandra CIOBANU Titre M´ethode de d´ecomposition de domaine avec adaptation de maillage en espace-temps pour les ´equations d’Euler et de Navier–Stokes devant le jury compos´ede: Fran¸cois Dubois Rapporteur Laurence Halpern Directrice de th`ese Rapha`ele Herbin Rapporteure Xavier Juvigny Examinateur Olivier Lafitte Examinateur Juliette Ryan Encadrante UNIVERSITY PARIS 13 THESIS Presented for the degree of DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSIT E´ PARIS 13 In Applied Mathematics Hosting laboratory: ONERA - The French Aerospace Lab presented for public discussion on 19 decembre 2014 by Oana Alexandra CIOBANU Subject Adaptive Space-Time Domain Decomposition Methods for Euler and Navier–Stokes Equations Jury: Fran¸cois Dubois Reviewer Laurence Halpern Supervisor Rapha`ele Herbin Reviewer Xavier Juvigny Examiner Olivier Lafitte Examiner Juliette Ryan Supervisor newpage Remerciements Tout d’abord, je remercie grandement Juliette Ryan pour avoir accept´e d’ˆetre mon encad- rante de stage puis mon encadrante de th`ese. Pendant plus de trois ans, elle m’a fait d´ecouvrir mon m´etier de jeune chercheuse avec beaucoup de patience et de professionnalisme. Elle m’a soutenue, elle a ´et´ed’une disponibilit´eet d’une ´ecoute extraordinaires, tout en sachant ˆetre rigoureuse et exigeante avec moi comme avec elle-mˆeme. Humainement, j’ai beaucoup appr´eci´e la relation d’amiti´eque nous avons entretenue, le climat de confiance que nous avons maintenu et les discussions extra-math´ematiques que nous avons pu avoir et qui ont renforc´ele lien que nous avions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of High-Resolution, Finite-Volume, Adaptive±Stencil
    Advances in Water Resources 24 (2001) 29±48 www.elsevier.com/locate/advwatres A comparison of high-resolution, ®nite-volume, adaptive±stencil schemes for simulating advective±dispersive transport Matthew W. Farthing, Cass T. Miller * Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Center for the Advanced Study of the Environment, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7400, USA Received 1 February 2000; received in revised form 8 May 2000; accepted 16 May 2000 Abstract We investigate a set of adaptive±stencil, ®nite-volume schemes used to capture sharp fronts and shocks in a wide range of ®elds. Our objective is to determine the most promising methods available from this set for solving sharp-front advective±dispersive transport problems. Schemes are evaluated for a range of initial conditions, and for Peclet and Courant numbers. Based upon results from this work, we identify the most promising schemes based on eciency and robustness. Ó 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction ecient for solving relatively simple advective-domi- nated problems. These approaches, however, can pose The processes of solute and energy transport in nat- mass conservation problems, are not well suited for ural systems are most often described using an advec- problems with multiple sources and non-linear mass tive±dispersive equation (ADE) with additional terms transfer terms, and can be diusive and oscillatory for sources, reactions, and interphase exchange of mass [3,19,38,44]. or energy [34]. For many problems, especially those in- Over the last decade, simulators in the water re- volving multiple species, ADE solutions can be a sub- sources ®eld have employed so-called high-resolution stantial part of the computational eort involved for a methods more and more for discretizing the advective given ¯ow and transport simulator.
    [Show full text]
  • New Roe Scheme for All Speed Flow
    Role of Momentum Interpolation Mechanism of the Roe Scheme in Shock Instability Xiao-dong Ren1,2 Chun-wei Gu1 Xue-song Li1,* 1. Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, PR China 2. Department of Mathematics, School of Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China Abstract: The shock instability phenomenon is a famous problem for the shock-capturing scheme. By subdividing the numerical dissipation of the Roe scheme, the pressure-difference-driven modification for the cell face velocity is regarded as a version of the momentum interpolation method (MIM). The MIM is necessary for low Mach number flows to suppress the pressure checkerboard problem. Through the analysis and numerical tests, MIM has been discovered to have the most important function in shock instability. In fact, MIM should be completely removed for non-linear flows. However, unexpected MIM is activated on the cell face nearly parallel to the flow for high Mach number flows or low Mach number flows in shock. Therefore, the MIM should be kept for low Mach number flows and be completely removed for high Mach number flows and low Mach number flows in shock. For such conditions, two coefficients are designed on the basis of the local Mach number and a shock detector. The improved Roe scheme is then proposed. This scheme considers the requirement of MIM for incompressible and compressible flows and is validated for good performance of numerical tests. It is also proved that the acceptable result can be obtained with only Mach number coefficient for general practical computation.
    [Show full text]
  • Second-Order MUSCL Schemes Based on Dual Mesh Gradient Reconstruction \(DMGR\)
    ESAIM: M2AN 48 (2014) 583–602 ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis DOI: 10.1051/m2an/2013105 www.esaim-m2an.org SECOND-ORDER MUSCL SCHEMES BASED ON DUAL MESH GRADIENT RECONSTRUCTION (DMGR) Christophe Berthon1, Yves Coudiere` 2,3 and Vivien Desveaux1 Abstract. We discuss new MUSCL reconstructions to approximate the solutions of hyperbolic systems of conservations laws on 2D unstructured meshes. To address such an issue, we write two MUSCL schemes on two overlapping meshes. A gradient reconstruction procedure is next defined by involving both approximations coming from each MUSCL scheme. This process increases the number of numerical unknowns, but it allows to reconstruct very accurate gradients. Moreover a particular attention is paid on the limitation procedure to enforce the required robustness property. Indeed, the invariant region is usually preserved at the expense of a more restrictive CFL condition. Here, we try to optimize this condition in order to reduce the computational cost. Mathematics Subject Classification. 65M12, 35L65, 76M12. Received July 5, 2012. Revised May 24, 2013. Published online January 20, 2014. 1. Introduction The present work is devoted to the numerical approximation of the weak solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic systems of conservation laws in two dimensions. The system under consideration reads 2 ∂tw + ∂xf(w)+∂yg(w)=0,t≥ 0, (x, y) ∈ R , (1.1) where w : R+ × R2 → Ω stands for the unknown state vector. Here, Ω ⊂ Rd denotes the well-known set of admissible states and is assumed to be convex. Concerning the flux functions f,g : Ω → Rd, as usual they are assumed to be smooth enough, at least Lipschitz-continuous.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Hyperbolic Solvers Ii: Ausm-Type and Hybrid Lax-Wendroff- Lax-Friedrichs Methods for Two-Phase Flows
    Brazilian Journal of Chemical ISSN 0104-6632 Printed in Brazil Engineering www.abeq.org.br/bjche Vol. 27, No. 01, pp. 153 - 171, January - March, 2010 A COMPARISON OF HYPERBOLIC SOLVERS II: AUSM-TYPE AND HYBRID LAX-WENDROFF- LAX-FRIEDRICHS METHODS FOR TWO-PHASE FLOWS R. M. L. Coelho1*, P. L. C. Lage2 and A. Silva Telles1 1Curso de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologia de Processos Químicos e Bioquímicos (TPQB), Departamento de Engenharia Química, Escola de Química, Bloco E, Centro de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, CEP: 21949-900, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil. 2Programa de Engenharia Química, COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, P.O. Box 68502, CEP: 21945-970, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil. *Current address: Research and Development Center (PETROBRAS /CENPES/EB-E&P/EPEP), Phone: + (55) (21) 3865-7406, Fax: + (55) (21) 3865-6793, Cidade Universitária, Q.7, Ilha do Fundão, CEP: 21949-900, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] (Submitted: October 23, 2008 ; Revised: October 30, 2009 ; Accepted: January 4, 2010) Abstract - Riemann-solver based schemes are difficult and sometimes impossible to be applied for complex flows due to the required average state. Other methods that do not use Riemann-solvers are best suited for such cases. Among them, AUSM+, AUSMDV and the recently proposed Hybrid Lax-Friedrichs-Lax-Wendroff (HLFW) have been extended to two-phase flows. The eigenstructure of the two-fluid model is complex due to the phase interactions, leading to numerous numerical difficulties. One of them is the well-posedness of the equation system because it may lose hyperbolicity.
    [Show full text]
  • Test Cases for Grid-Based Direct Kinetic Modeling of Plasma Flows
    Plasma Sources Science and Technology PAPER Related content - Numerical analysis of azimuthal rotating Test cases for grid-based direct kinetic modeling spokes in a crossed-field discharge plasma of plasma flows R Kawashima, K Hara and K Komurasaki - Hollow cathode modeling: I. A coupled plasma thermal two-dimensional model To cite this article: Kentaro Hara and Kyle Hanquist 2018 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 27 065004 Gaétan Sary, Laurent Garrigues and Jean- Pierre Boeuf - Sheaths in laboratory and space plasmas Scott Robertson View the article online for updates and enhancements. Recent citations - Interaction of biased electrodes and plasmas: sheaths, double layers, and fireballs Scott D Baalrud et al - Ion kinetics and nonlinear saturation of current-driven instabilities relevant to hollow cathode plasmas Kentaro Hara and Cameron Treece - An overview of discharge plasma modeling for Hall effect thrusters Kentaro Hara This content was downloaded from IP address 150.135.159.43 on 05/01/2021 at 00:18 Plasma Sources Science and Technology Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 27 (2018) 065004 (14pp) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6595/aac6b9 Test cases for grid-based direct kinetic modeling of plasma flows Kentaro Hara1 and Kyle Hanquist2 1 Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America 2 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America E-mail: [email protected] Received 19 January 2018, revised 1 May 2018 Accepted for publication 22 May 2018 Published 18 June 2018 Abstract Grid-based kinetic models are promising in that the numerical noise inherent in particle-based methods is essentially eliminated. Here, we call such grid-based techniques a direct kinetic (DK) model.
    [Show full text]
  • The C-MUSCL Scheme, a High Order Finite Volume Method with Constrained Transport for Astrophysical MHD
    Master's Thesis The C-MUSCL Scheme, a High Order Finite Volume Method with Constrained Transport for astrophysical MHD Lukas Knosp September 23, 2019 Supervisor: Associate Professor Dr. Ralf Kissmann Institute for Astro- and Particle Physics Contents Statutory Declaration4 I. Astrophysical Plasmas6 1. From Kinetic Theory to Magnetohydrodynamics7 2. Equations and Notations 12 2.1. Euler System . 13 2.1.1. Alternative Formulation . 13 2.2. Induction System . 14 II. Numerical Methods 16 3. Introduction 17 4. Theory of Hyperbolic Conservation Laws 19 4.1. Linear Conservation Laws . 19 4.1.1. Linear Scalar Advection . 19 4.1.2. Linear Hyperbolic Systems . 22 4.2. Non-linear Conservation Laws . 25 4.2.1. Burgers' Equation . 26 4.2.2. Non-linear Systems . 30 5. Finite Volume Methods 33 5.1. Conservative Schemes . 33 5.2. Godunov'sMethod .............................. 36 5.3. The HLL Approximate Riemann Solver . 38 5.4. High-Order Godunov-type Methods . 39 5.4.1. Reconstruction . 40 5.4.2. Semi-Discrete Schemes . 43 5.4.3. MUSCL-Hancock-Method . 44 5.5. Finite Volume Methods in Three Dimensions . 47 5.5.1. Conservative Schemes . 47 5.5.2. High-Order Schemes in Multiple Space Dimensions . 48 2 6. Treatment of the Magnetic Field 50 6.1. Constrained Transport . 51 6.1.1. High-Order Variation . 54 6.2. C-MUSCL Scheme . 55 III. Implementation 58 7. The CRONOS-Code 59 7.1. CodeStructure ................................ 59 7.2. Adapting the Code . 61 8. Verification & Results 63 8.1. One-dimensional Tests . 63 8.1.1. SodShock-Tube............................ 63 8.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • An Efficient High-Resolution Shock-Capturing Scheme for Multi
    Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys. Vol. 6 (2006), No. 6, 680–688 Chinese Journal of (http://www.chjaa.org) Astronomy and Astrophysics An Efficient High-Resolution Shock-Capturing Scheme for Multi-Dimensional Flows I. Hydrodynamics ∗ Cong Yu 1 National Astronomical Observatories / Yunnan Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650011; [email protected] 2 Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049 Received 2006 February 27; accepted 2006 April 17 Abstract Many problems at the forefront of theoretical astrophysics require a treatment of dynamical fluid behavior. We present an efficient high-resolution shock-capturing hydrody- namic scheme designed to study such phenomena. We have implemented a weighted, essen- tially non-oscillatory (WENO) scheme to fifth order accuracy in space. HLLE approximate Riemann solver is used for the flux computation at cell interface, which does not require spectral decomposition into characteristic waves and so is computationally friendly. For time integration we apply a third order total variation diminishing (TVD) Runge-Kutta scheme. Extensive testing and comparison with schemes that require characteristic decomposition are carried out demonstrating the ability of our scheme to address challenging open questions in astrophysics. Key words: accretion — hydrodynamics — method: numerical — shock waves 1 INTRODUCTION High-resolution shock-capturing methods of the Godunov type have been successfully applied to various as- trophysical problems in the last decade (Mellema, Eulderink
    [Show full text]
  • Romain Teyssier
    The RAMSES code and related techniques I. Hydro solvers Romain Teyssier HIPACC 2010 Romain Teyssier Outline - The Euler equations - Systems of conservation laws - The Riemann problem - The Godunov Method - Riemann solvers - 2D Godunov schemes - Second-order scheme with MUSCL - Slope limiters and TVD schemes - 2D slope limiter. HIPACC 2010 Romain Teyssier The Euler equations in conservative form A system of 3 conservation laws The vector of conservative variables HIPACC 2010 Romain Teyssier The Euler equations in primitive form A non-linear system of PDE (quasi-linear form) The vector of primitive variables We restrict our analysis to perfect gases HIPACC 2010 Romain Teyssier The isothermal Euler equations Conservative form with conservative variables Primitive form with primitive variables a is the isothermal sound speed HIPACC 2010 Romain Teyssier Systems of conservation laws General system of conservation laws with F flux vector. Examples: 1- Isothermal Euler equations 2- Euler equation 3- Ideal MHD equations HIPACC 2010 Romain Teyssier Primitive variables and quasi-linear form We define the Jacobian of the flux function as: The system writes in the quasi-linear (non-conservative) form We define the primitive variables and the Jacobian of the transformation The system writes in the primitive (non-conservative) form The matrix A is obtained by The system is hyperbolic if A or J have real eigenvalues. HIPACC 2010 Romain Teyssier The advection equation Scalar (one variable) linear (u=constant) partial differential equation (PDE) Initial conditions: Define the function: Using the chain rule, we have: is a Riemann Invariant along the characteristic curves defined by t x HIPACC 2010 Romain Teyssier The isothermal wave equation We linearize the isothermal Euler equation around some equilibrium state.
    [Show full text]