DOCSLIB.ORG

The Role of NWP Filter for the Satellite Based Detection of Cumulonimbus Clouds

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Role of NWP Filter for the Satellite Based Detection of Cumulonimbus Clouds Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 30 November 2017 doi:10.20944/preprints201711.0194.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 386; doi:10.3390/rs10030386 Article The Role of NWP Filter for the Satellite Based Detection of Cumulonimbus Clouds Richard Müller 1* ID , Stephane Haussler 1 and Matthias Jerg 1, 1 German Weather Service, Frankfurter Str 135, 63067 Offenbach, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-(0)69-8062-4922 1 Abstract: The study investigates the role of NWP filtering for the remote sensing of Cumulonimbus 2 Clouds (Cbs) by implementation of 14 different experiments, covering Central Europe. These 3 experiments compiles different stability filter settings as well as the use of different channels for 4 the InfraRed (IR) brightness temperatures. As stability filter parameters from Numerical Weather 5 Prediction (NWP) are used. The brightness temperature information results from the IR SEVIRI 6 instrument on-board of Meteosat Second Generation satellite and enables the detection of very cold 7 and high clouds close to the tropopause. The satellite only approaches (no NWP filtering) result 8 in the detection of Cbs with a relative high probability of detection, but unfortunately combined 9 with a large False Alarm Rate (FAR), leading to a Critical Success Index (CSI) below 60 %. The false 10 alarms results from other types of very cold and high clouds. It is shown that the false alarms can be 11 significantly decreased by application of an appropriate NWP stability filter, leading to the increase 12 of CSI to about 70 % . A brief review and reflection of the literature clarifies that the this function 13 of the NWP filter can not be replaced by MSG IR spectroscopy. Thus, NWP filtering is strongly 14 recommended to increase the quality of satellite based Cb detection. Further, it has been shown that 15 the well established convective available potential energy (CAPE) and the convection index (KO) 16 works well as stability filter. 17 Keywords: cumulonimbus; thunderstorms; stability filter; aviation 18 1. Introduction 19 Cumulonimbus clouds (Cb) originate from rapid vertical updraft of humid and warm air enforced 20 by constraint forces caused e.g. by mountains, heating or cold fronts. The fast cooling of the air with 21 rising height leads to optically thick and very cold clouds, referred to as cumulonimbus clouds (Cbs), 22 which are usually accompanied by lightning, heavy precipitation, hail, and turbulence. Early and 23 reliable prediction of Cb clouds is therefore of great importance for weather forecasts and warnings, in 24 particular for aviation, as Cb clouds (thunderstorms) constitute one of the most important natural risks 25 for aircraft accidents. An accurate Cb detection and short term forecast enables cost-efficient planning 26 and use of alternative routes, increasing flight safety. 27 Yet, the reliable simulation of convective cells and Cbs by means of numerical weather prediction 28 is still a very difficult task. Thus, observational data plays a pivotal role for the accurate detection and 29 short term forecast of Cbs. Over ocean and a vast number of countries, which are not well equipped 30 with precipitation RADARs, satellites are in addition to global lightning ground based networks the 31 only observational source for the detection of Cbs, e.g. [1]. As a result of the thermodynamics involved 32 in the generation of Cbs they are optical thick and their tops are located close to the tropopause. 33 Therefore, from a satellite perspective they are characterized by very cold brightness temperatures 34 corresponding to high cloud top heights (CTH). 35 Thus, cloud top height is on option used as a straightforward method to provide information 36 about the risk for cumulonimbus cloud occurrence as operated by e.g. NCAR ([2] and references 37 therein). The cloud top height can be derived from the brightness temperature (BT) in the atmospheric 38 window channel (InfraRed 10.6), which corresponds in good approximation to the temperature of the © 2017 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 30 November 2017 doi:10.20944/preprints201711.0194.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 386; doi:10.3390/rs10030386 2 of 11 39 cloud top for Cbs. A NWP based profile of the atmosphere can then be used to link the temperature 40 to the height of the cloud top, see figure1 for an example of an atmospheric profile. A more detailed discussion of methods for the estimation of CTH are presented in [3]. 60 60 US standard atmosphere US standard atmosphere mid-latitude standard atmosphere mid-latitude standard atmosphere tropopause tropopause 50 50 ] ] m m 40 40 k k [ [ l l e e v v e e l l a a e e s s e e 30 30 v v o o b b a a t t h h g g i i e e 20 20 H H 10 10 0 0 150 200 250 300 350 400 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Temperature [K] Pressure [mbar] Figure 1. Left hand: The image shows the relation of the height above sea level and the temperature in the atmosphere for the US standard atmosphere and a standard atmosphere for mid-latitude summer. Diagrammed is also the height of the tropopause, which "separates" the troposphere from the stratosphere. Right hand: Relation between pressure and height for the same profile. 41 42 Another simple, but widely used method is that applied in the Global Convective Diagnostics 43 approach [4] and [2]. The method uses the brightness temperature difference between the 6.7 mm the 44 11.6 mm infrared satellite channel, the former is also referred to as water vapour channel, cause of 45 the large water vapour absorption bands. If the difference exceeds 1 degree it is assumed that the 46 observed cloud is a cumulonimbus cloud. The physical background of this approach has been already 47 discussed in 1997 by Schmetz et al. [5]. They investigated the potential of satellite observation for the 48 monitoring of deep convection and overshooting tops. They found that the brightness temperature 49 of the water vapor channel (5.7-7.1 mm) can be larger (warmer) than that of the IR window channel 50 (10.5-12.5 mm). They demonstrated by radiative transfer modeling (RTM) that the larger brightness 51 temperatures (BT) in the WV channel are due to stratospheric (tropopause) water vapor, which absorbs 52 radiation from the cold cloud and subsequently emits radiation at higher temperature (warmer), as 53 the temperature increases in the stratosphere, see figure1. The effect is largest when the cloud top 54 is at the tropopause temperature inversion. Optical thick high clouds cover the tropospheric water 55 vapor and only the emission from the stratospheric water vapor contributes to the radiance observed 56 by the satellite instrument. In contrast, for lower clouds the tropospheric water vapor above the clouds 57 absorbs the radiation and the emitted radiation is colder than the absorbed. It is therefore obvious that 58 the temperature difference increases with increasing cloud height. 59 The effect discussed by [5] occurs also if the difference of the two water vapor channels are used. 60 The use of this combination is possible since the launch of Meteosat Second Generation satellites, which 61 has the Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Image (SEVIRI) instrument on-board. This instrument 62 is equipped with additional channels in the Infrared (IR). The normalized weighting function of the 63 SEVIRI IR channels is diagrammed in Figure2 for clear sky. 64 Note, that the water vapor channel at 6.2 mm receives significant contributions from the 65 stratosphere, which are larger than the equivalent contributions of the WV channel at 7.3mm. Thus, 66 the mechanism discussed by Schmetz et al [5] works also well for the difference of the water vapor 67 channels. 68 A slightly different approach is used by the Nowcasting Satellite Application Facility NWC-SAF. 69 This method is based upon an adaptive brightness temperature thresholds of infrared images [6]. 70 Further, cloud classification methods have been developed which use texture information of the visible 71 channels in addition to the brightness temperature thresholds to detect Cbs and other cloud types. The Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 30 November 2017 doi:10.20944/preprints201711.0194.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 386; doi:10.3390/rs10030386 3 of 11 Figure 2. The image shows the normalized weighting function of MSG for clear sky , source Eumetrain 72 NRL Cloud Classification (CC) algorithm [7] is one example. It is used by the Oceanic Weather Product 73 Development Team to assist in the accurate detection of deep convective clouds. Another example 74 is the Berendes cloud mask [8]. However, in both methods visible channels are utilized and they are 75 therefore not applicable during night. Thus, these approaches are not sufficient to provide a day and 76 night service needed by aviation. Finally, there exists a commercially offered software package, which 77 has been developed and validated by Zinner et. al [9] and references therein. 78 All these approaches use information from the IR region for the satellite based detection of Cbs. 79 However, not only Cbs are optically thick and cold, but also other clouds, which can lead to serious 80 false alarms. As briefly discussed in [2] these false alarms might be reduced by the implementation of 81 an stability filer from NWP. 82 To the knowledge of the authors the above mentioned methods do either not apply an NWP filter 83 (e.g.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • American Meteorological Society Revised Manuscript Click Here to Download Manuscript (Non-Latex): JAMC-D-14-0252 Revision3.Docx
    AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology EARLY ONLINE RELEASE This is a preliminary PDF of the author-produced manuscript that has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. Since it is being posted so soon after acceptance, it has not yet been copyedited, formatted, or processed by AMS Publications. This preliminary version of the manuscript may be downloaded, distributed, and cited, but please be aware that there will be visual differences and possibly some content differences between this version and the final published version. The DOI for this manuscript is doi: 10.1175/JAMC-D-14-0252.1 The final published version of this manuscript will replace the preliminary version at the above DOI once it is available. If you would like to cite this EOR in a separate work, please use the following full citation: Wang, Y., and B. Geerts, 2015: Vertical-plane dual-Doppler radar observations of cumulus toroidal circulations. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol. doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-14- 0252.1, in press. © 2015 American Meteorological Society Revised manuscript Click here to download Manuscript (non-LaTeX): JAMC-D-14-0252_revision3.docx Vertical-plane dual-Doppler radar observations of cumulus toroidal circulations Yonggang Wang1, and Bart Geerts University of Wyoming Submitted to J. Appl. Meteor. Climat. October 2014 Revised version submitted in May 2015 1 Corresponding author address: Yonggang Wang, Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie WY 82071, USA; email: [email protected] 1 Profiling dual-Doppler radar observations of cumulus toroidal circulations 2 3 Abstract 4 5 6 High-resolution vertical-plane dual-Doppler velocity data, collected by an airborne profiling 7 cloud radar in transects across non-precipitating orographic cumulus clouds, are used to examine 8 vortical circulations near cloud top.
    [Show full text]
  • Äikesega) Kaasnevad Ohtlikud Ilmanähtused
    TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL Eesti Mereakadeemia Merenduskeskus Veeteede lektoraat Raldo Täll RÜNKSAJUPILVEDEGA KAASNEVAD OHTLIKUD ILMANÄHTUSED LÄÄNEMEREL Lõputöö Juhendajad: Jüri Kamenik Lia Pahapill Tallinn 2016 SISUKORD SISUKORD ................................................................................................................................ 2 SÕNASTIK ................................................................................................................................ 4 SISSEJUHATUS ........................................................................................................................ 6 1. RÜNKSAJUPILVED JA ÄIKE ............................................................................................. 8 1.1. Äikese tekkimine ja areng ............................................................................................. 10 1.1.1. Äikese arengustaadiumid ........................................................................................ 11 1.2. Äikeste klassifikatsioon ................................................................................................. 14 1.2.1. Sünoptilise olukorra põhine liigitus ........................................................................ 14 1.2.2. Äikese seos tsüklonitega ......................................................................................... 15 1.2.3. Organiseerumispõhine liigitus ................................................................................ 16 2. RÜNKSAJUPILVEDEGA (ÄIKESEGA) KAASNEVAD OHTLIKUD ILMANÄHTUSED
    [Show full text]
  • Session 8.Pdf
    MARTIN SETVÁK [email protected] CZECH HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE ČESKÝ HYDROMETEOROLOGICKÝ ÚSTAV http://www.chmi.cz http://www.setvak.cz Anticipated benefits of improved temporal and spatial resolution (with focus on deep convective clouds) EUMeTrain Event Week on MTG-I Satellite, 7 – 11 November 2016 Martin Setvák version: 2016-11-11 Introduction The most significant impact of improved spatial resolution and shorter scan interval: observations (detection, monitoring, nowcasting, …) and studies of short-lived and small scale features or phenomena e.g. fires, valley fog, shallow convection, and tops of deep convective clouds (storms) – namely their overshooting tops Martin Setvák Introduction The most significant impact of improved spatial resolution and shorter scan interval: observations (detection, monitoring, nowcasting, …) and studies of short-lived and small scale features or phenomena e.g. fires, valley fog, shallow convection, and tops of deep convective clouds (storms) – namely their overshooting tops geometrical properties and characteristics (visible and near-IR bands), cloud microphysics, cloud-top brightness temperature (BT) Martin Setvák Overshooting tops definition and appearance OVERSHOOTING TOP (anvil dome, penetrating top): A domelike protrusion above a cumulonimbus anvil, representing the intrusion of an updraft through its equilibrium level (level of neutral buoyancy). It is usually a transient feature because the rising parcel's momentum acquired during its buoyant ascent carries it past the point where it is
    [Show full text]
  • Severe Weather in the United States
    Module 18: Severe Thunderstorms in the United States Tuscaloosa, Alabama May 18, 2011 Dan Koopman 2011 What is “Severe Weather”? Any meteorological condition that has potential to cause damage, serious social disruption, or loss of human life. American Meteorological Society: In general, any destructive storm, but usually applied to severe local storms in particular, that is, intense thunderstorms, hailstorms, and tornadoes. Three Stages of Thunderstorm Development Stage 1: Cumulus • A warm parcel of air begins ascending vertically into the atmosphere. • In an unstable environment, the parcel will continue to rise as long as it is warmer than the air around it. • Billowing, puffy Cumulus Congestus Clouds continue to build in towers. Stage 2: Mature • At a certain altitude, the parcel is no longer warmer than its environment. It is unable to rise any further and develops the distinctive “Anvil” shape as seen in this figure. • In cases of particularly strong updrafts, the vertical velocity of the updraft may be sufficient to penetrate this altitude causing an “overshooting top” to develop above the flat top of the anvil. Stage 3: Dissipating • Convective inflow shut off by strong downdrafts, no more cloud droplet formation, downdrafts continue and gradually weaken until light precipitation rains out • Water droplets aloft being to coalesce until they are too heavy to support and begin to fall to the surface, strengthening the downdraft. Basic Ingredients for Thunderstorms • Moisture • Unstable Air • Forcing Mechanism Moisture Thunderstorms development generally requires dewpoints > 50°F Unstable Air Stable is resistant to change. When the air is stable, even if a parcel of air is lifted above its original position (say by a mountain for example), its temperature will always remain cooler than its environment, meaning that it will resist upwards movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Flash Flooding
    NationalNational OceanicOceanic andand AtmosphericAtmospheric AdministrationAdministration (NOAA)(NOAA) NationalNational WeatherWeather ServiceService (NWS)(NWS) PresentsPresents SevereSevere WeatherWeather ObserverObserver andand SafetySafety TrainingTraining 20052005 Severe Weather Spotter Line 1-888-668-3344 Spotter Reports E-mail: www.crh.noaa.gov/espotter Homepage Address: www.crh.noaa.gov/iwx 2 GoalsGoals ofof thethe TrainingTraining You will learn: • Definitions of important weather terms and severe weather criteria • How thunderstorms develop and why some become severe • How to correctly identify cloud features that may or may not be associated with severe weather • What information the observer is to report and how to report it • Ways to receive weather information before and during severe weather events • Observer Safety! 3 WFOWFO NorthernNorthern IndianaIndiana (WFO(WFO IWX)IWX) CountyCounty WarningWarning andand ForecastForecast AreaArea (CWFA)(CWFA) Work with public, state and local officials Dedicated team of highly trained professionals 24 hours a day/7 days a week Prepare forecasts and warnings for 2.3 million people in 37 counties 4 SKYWARNSKYWARN (Severe(Severe Weather)Weather) ObserversObservers Why Are You Critical to NWS Operations? • Help overcome Doppler Radar limitations • Provide ground truth which can be correlated with radar signatures prior to, during, and after severe weather • Ground truth reports in warnings heighten public awareness and allow us to have confidence in our warning decisions 5 SKYWARNSKYWARN (Severe(Severe Weather)Weather) ObserversObservers Why Are You Critical to NWS Operations? • The NWS receives hundreds of reports of “False” or “Mis-Identified” funnel clouds and tornadoes each year • We strongly rely on the “2 out of 3” Rule before issuing a warning. Of the following, we like to have 2 out of 3 present before sending out a warning.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Severe Weather Terms
    Glossary of Severe Weather Terms -A- Anvil The flat, spreading top of a cloud, often shaped like an anvil. Thunderstorm anvils may spread hundreds of miles downwind from the thunderstorm itself, and sometimes may spread upwind. Anvil Dome A large overshooting top or penetrating top. -B- Back-building Thunderstorm A thunderstorm in which new development takes place on the upwind side (usually the west or southwest side), such that the storm seems to remain stationary or propagate in a backward direction. Back-sheared Anvil [Slang], a thunderstorm anvil which spreads upwind, against the flow aloft. A back-sheared anvil often implies a very strong updraft and a high severe weather potential. Beaver ('s) Tail [Slang], a particular type of inflow band with a relatively broad, flat appearance suggestive of a beaver's tail. It is attached to a supercell's general updraft and is oriented roughly parallel to the pseudo-warm front, i.e., usually east to west or southeast to northwest. As with any inflow band, cloud elements move toward the updraft, i.e., toward the west or northwest. Its size and shape change as the strength of the inflow changes. Spotters should note the distinction between a beaver tail and a tail cloud. A "true" tail cloud typically is attached to the wall cloud and has a cloud base at about the same level as the wall cloud itself. A beaver tail, on the other hand, is not attached to the wall cloud and has a cloud base at about the same height as the updraft base (which by definition is higher than the wall cloud).
    [Show full text]
  • Nowcasting Applications
    Nowcasting Applications African SWIFT Summer School Morné Gijben [email protected] Weather Research South African Weather Service Doc Ref no: RES-PPT-SWIFT-20190729-GIJ002-001.1 2020/01/10 1 What is the difference between nowcasting and forecasting? 2020/01/10 2 Definition of time ranges • Nowcasting: A description of current weather parameters and 0 to 2 hours’ description of forecast weather parameters • Very short-range weather forecasting: Up to 12 hours’ description of weather parameters • Short-range weather forecasting: Beyond 12 hours’ and up to 72 hours’ description of weather parameters • Medium-range weather forecasting: Beyond 72 hours’ and up to 240 hours’ description of weather parameters • Extended-range weather forecasting: Beyond 10 days’ and up to 30 days’ description of weather parameters. Usually averaged and expressed as a departure from climate values for that period 2020/01/10 3 Definition of time ranges • Long-range forecasting: From 30 days up to two years • Month forecast: Description of averaged weather parameters expressed as a departure (deviation, variation, anomaly) from climate values for that month at any lead-time • Seasonal forecast: Description of averaged weather parameters expressed as a departure from climate values for that season at any lead-time • Climate forecasting: Beyond two years • Climate variability prediction: Description of the expected climate parameters associated with the variation of interannual, decadal and multi-decadal climate anomalies • Climate prediction: Description
    [Show full text]
  • Objective Satellite-Based Detection of Overshooting Tops Using Infrared Window Channel Brightness Temperature Gradients
    VOLUME 49 JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010 Objective Satellite-Based Detection of Overshooting Tops Using Infrared Window Channel Brightness Temperature Gradients KRISTOPHER BEDKA,JASON BRUNNER,RICHARD DWORAK,WAYNE FELTZ, JASON OTKIN, AND THOMAS GREENWALD Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin (Manuscript received 19 May 2009, in final form 31 August 2009) ABSTRACT Deep convective storms with overshooting tops (OTs) are capable of producing hazardous weather con- ditions such as aviation turbulence, frequent lightning, heavy rainfall, large hail, damaging wind, and tor- nadoes. This paper presents a new objective infrared-only satellite OT detection method called infrared window (IRW)-texture. This method uses a combination of 1) infrared window channel brightness temper- ature (BT) gradients, 2) an NWP tropopause temperature forecast, and 3) OT size and BT criteria defined through analysis of 450 thunderstorm events within 1-km Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) imagery. Qualitative validation of the IRW-texture and the well-documented water vapor (WV) minus IRW BT difference (BTD) technique is performed using visible channel imagery, CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar, and/or Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) cloud-top height for selected cases. Quantitative validation of these two techniques is obtained though comparison with OT detections from synthetic satellite imagery derived from a cloud-resolving NWP simulation. The results show that the IRW-texture method false-alarm rate ranges from 4.2% to 38.8%, depending upon the magnitude of the overshooting and algo- rithm quality control settings.
    [Show full text]
  • PICTURE of the MONTH Some Frequently Overlooked Severe
    JUNE 2004 PICTURE OF THE MONTH 1529 PICTURE OF THE MONTH Some Frequently Overlooked Severe Thunderstorm Characteristics Observed on GOES Imagery: A Topic for Future Research JOHN F. W EAVER AND DAN LINDSEY NOAA/NESDIS/RAMM Team, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 23 October 2003 and 23 December 2003 ABSTRACT Several examples of Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) visible satellite images de- picting cloud features often associated with the transition to, or intensi®cation of, supercell thunderstorms are presented. The accompanying discussion describes what is known about these features, and what is left to learn. The examples are presented to increase awareness among meteorologists of these potentially signi®cant storm features. 1. Introduction dom 1976, 1983; Weaver 1980; Weaver and Nelson The role of satellite imagery in de®ning the near- 1982; Purdom and Sco®eld 1986; Weaver and Purdom storm environment of severe/tornadic thunderstorms has 1995; Browning et al. 1997; Weaver et al. 1994, 2000; been well documented over the past three decades (Pur- 2002; Bikos et al. 2002). Additionally, several papers have been written concerning storm-top characteristics of severe storms (Heyms®eld et al. 1983; McCann 1983; Corresponding author address: John F. Weaver, NOAA/NESDIS/ Adler and Mack 1986; SetvaÂk and Doswell 1991). Much RAMM, CIRA BuildingÐFoothills Campus, Colorado State Uni- versity, Fort Collins, CO 80523. less has been written concerning low-level,
    [Show full text]
  • Weather Spotter's Field Guide
    Weather Spotter’s Field Guide © Roger Edwards A Guide to Being a SKYWARN® Spotter U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service Ⓡ June 2011 The Spotter’s Role Section 1 The SKYWARN® Spotter and the Spotter’s Role The United States is the most severe weather- prone country in the world. Each year, people in this country cope with an average of 10,000 thunderstorms, 5,000 floods, 1,200 tornadoes, and two landfalling hurricanes. Approximately 90% of all presidentially Ⓡ declared disasters are weather-related, causing around 500 deaths each year and nearly $14 billion in damage. SKYWARN® is a National Weather Service (NWS) program developed in the 1960s that consists of trained weather spotters who provide reports of severe and hazardous weather to help meteorologists make life-saving warning decisions. Spotters are concerned citizens, amateur radio operators, truck drivers, mariners, airplane pilots, emergency management personnel, and public safety officials who volunteer their time and energy to report on hazardous weather impacting their community. Although, NWS has access to data from Doppler radar, satellite, and surface weather stations, technology cannot detect every instance of hazardous weather. Spotters help fill in the gaps by reporting hail, wind damage, flooding, heavy snow, tornadoes and waterspouts. Radar is an excellent tool, but it is just that: one tool among many that NWS uses. We need spotters to report how storms and other hydrometeorological phenomena are impacting their area. SKYWARN® spotter reports provide vital “ground truth” to the NWS. They act as our eyes and ears in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Weather Testbed – Final Evaluation
    Aviation Weather Testbed – Final Evaluation Project Title: 2014 GOES-R/JPSS Demonstration Organization: NOAA’s Aviation Weather Testbed (AWT) Evaluator(s): Aviation Weather Center (AWC) forecasters, Central Weather Service Unit (CWSU) forecasters, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) personnel, and general aviation personnel Duration of Evaluation: 1 February 2014 – 1 September 2014 Prepared By: Amanda Terborg (UW/CIMSS and NOAA/AWC) Final Submitted Date: 19 September 2014 Table of Contents Contents ...........................................................................................................................................1 1. Summary ......................................................................................................................................2 2. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................2 3. GOES-R Products Evaluated .......................................................................................................4 3.1 Aircraft Flight Icing Threat ........................................................................................................5 3.2 ACHA Cloud Algorithms ..........................................................................................................6 3.3 Convective Toolkit.....................................................................................................................8 3.3.1 GOES-R Convective Initiation ...................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Prmet Ch14 Thunderstorm Fundamentals
    Copyright © 2015 by Roland Stull. Practical Meteorology: An Algebra-based Survey of Atmospheric Science. 14 THUNDERSTORM FUNDAMENTALS Contents Thunderstorm Characteristics 481 Thunderstorm characteristics, formation, and Appearance 482 forecasting are covered in this chapter. The next Clouds Associated with Thunderstorms 482 chapter covers thunderstorm hazards including Cells & Evolution 484 hail, gust fronts, lightning, and tornadoes. Thunderstorm Types & Organization 486 Basic Storms 486 Mesoscale Convective Systems 488 Supercell Thunderstorms 492 INFO • Derecho 494 Thunderstorm Formation 496 ThundersTorm CharacterisTiCs Favorable Conditions 496 Key Altitudes 496 Thunderstorms are convective clouds INFO • Cap vs. Capping Inversion 497 with large vertical extent, often with tops near the High Humidity in the ABL 499 tropopause and bases near the top of the boundary INFO • Median, Quartiles, Percentiles 502 layer. Their official name is cumulonimbus (see Instability, CAPE & Updrafts 503 the Clouds Chapter), for which the abbreviation is Convective Available Potential Energy 503 Cb. On weather maps the symbol represents Updraft Velocity 508 thunderstorms, with a dot •, asterisk *, or triangle Wind Shear in the Environment 509 ∆ drawn just above the top of the symbol to indicate Hodograph Basics 510 rain, snow, or hail, respectively. For severe thunder- Using Hodographs 514 storms, the symbol is . Shear Across a Single Layer 514 Mean Wind Shear Vector 514 Total Shear Magnitude 515 Mean Environmental Wind (Normal Storm Mo- tion) 516 Supercell Storm Motion 518 Bulk Richardson Number 521 Triggering vs. Convective Inhibition 522 Convective Inhibition (CIN) 523 Triggers 525 Thunderstorm Forecasting 527 Outlooks, Watches & Warnings 528 INFO • A Tornado Watch (WW) 529 Stability Indices for Thunderstorms 530 Review 533 Homework Exercises 533 Broaden Knowledge & Comprehension 533 © Gene Rhoden / weatherpix.com Apply 534 Figure 14.1 Evaluate & Analyze 537 Air-mass thunderstorm.
    [Show full text]