American Meteorological Society Revised Manuscript Click Here to Download Manuscript (Non-Latex): JAMC-D-14-0252 Revision3.Docx

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

American Meteorological Society Revised Manuscript Click Here to Download Manuscript (Non-Latex): JAMC-D-14-0252 Revision3.Docx AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology EARLY ONLINE RELEASE This is a preliminary PDF of the author-produced manuscript that has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. Since it is being posted so soon after acceptance, it has not yet been copyedited, formatted, or processed by AMS Publications. This preliminary version of the manuscript may be downloaded, distributed, and cited, but please be aware that there will be visual differences and possibly some content differences between this version and the final published version. The DOI for this manuscript is doi: 10.1175/JAMC-D-14-0252.1 The final published version of this manuscript will replace the preliminary version at the above DOI once it is available. If you would like to cite this EOR in a separate work, please use the following full citation: Wang, Y., and B. Geerts, 2015: Vertical-plane dual-Doppler radar observations of cumulus toroidal circulations. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol. doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-14- 0252.1, in press. © 2015 American Meteorological Society Revised manuscript Click here to download Manuscript (non-LaTeX): JAMC-D-14-0252_revision3.docx Vertical-plane dual-Doppler radar observations of cumulus toroidal circulations Yonggang Wang1, and Bart Geerts University of Wyoming Submitted to J. Appl. Meteor. Climat. October 2014 Revised version submitted in May 2015 1 Corresponding author address: Yonggang Wang, Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie WY 82071, USA; email: [email protected] 1 Profiling dual-Doppler radar observations of cumulus toroidal circulations 2 3 Abstract 4 5 6 High-resolution vertical-plane dual-Doppler velocity data, collected by an airborne profiling 7 cloud radar in transects across non-precipitating orographic cumulus clouds, are used to examine 8 vortical circulations near cloud top. These vortices are part of a toroidal ring centered at an 9 updraft, usually near the cloud top, and they are essential to cumulus entrainment and dynamics. 10 A large number of transects across toroidal circulations is composited, in order to reveal the 11 typical kinematic structure and associated entrainment patterns. The toroidal ring circulation is 12 ~1 km wide and about half as deep in the sampled clouds (Cu mediocris). The composite flow 13 field shows two nearly-symmetric, counter-rotating vortices, with a core updraft of ~3 m s-1, 14 consistent vortex-top divergence, two flanking downdrafts of the about same strength, and 15 horizontal (toroidal) vorticity of ~0.03 s-1. Variations with vortex size, age, and ambient shear are 16 examined, and the relative dilution of air in the vortex core is estimated by comparing the liquid 17 water content, estimated from path-integrated power attenuation, to the adiabatic value. 18 1. Introduction 19 Cumulus clouds (Cu) are important in the climate system because they affect the vertical 20 structure of radiative heat flux divergence and dynamically couple the planetary boundary layer 21 to the free troposphere through vertical transports of mass, heat, moisture, aerosol, and 22 momentum. These clouds exist over a broad range of horizontal and vertical dimensions (e.g., 23 Lopez 1977; Wielicki and Welch 1986). A significant fraction of the vertical exchanges in Cu 24 circulations occurs at scales smaller than resolvable scales in numerical weather prediction 25 (NWP) and climate models (e.g., Khairoutdinov et al. 2008), therefore Cu parameterizations 26 have been developed to represent the effect of sub-grid-scale convection on precipitation and the 27 vertical profile of resolved variables (e.g., Bretherton et al. 2004). Such parameterizations make 28 assumptions about the turbulent mixing of Cu clouds with the environment (Siebesma and 29 Cuijpers 1995). They are evaluated by means of high-resolution numerical simulations, such as 30 large-eddy simulations (LES, e.g., Zhao and Austin 2005). In turn, these high-resolution 31 convection-allowing simulations need to be validated with detailed Cu observations (e.g., 32 Grabowski and Clark 1993; Craig and Dörnbrack 2008). This paper is one such observational 33 study. 34 Specifically, this paper examines updraft-driven toroidal (vortex-ring) circulations in Cu. 35 There is much evidence for the existence of such circulations near the top of buoyant clouds, 36 from modeling simulations (Klaassen and Clark 1985; Grabowski and Clark 1993; Zhao and 37 Austin 2005), laboratory experiments (Woodward 1959; Sanchez et al. 1989; Johari 1992), and 38 observational studies. The latter have used in situ aircraft data (MacPherson and Isaac 1977; 39 Blyth et al. 1988; Jonas 1990; Blyth et al. 2005), trace gas data (Stith 1992), and airborne radar 40 data (Damiani et al. 2006; Damiani and Vali 2007; Wang and Geerts 2013). 1 41 This study uses high-resolution (~30 m) vertical plane dual-Doppler radar data collected 42 along flight tracks across or just above isolated orographic Cu clouds. While the 30 m resolution 43 is sufficient to resolve vortex ring circulations, the shortest revisit time an aircraft is capable of, 44 ~2 min, is too long to capture the evolution of these circulations and entrainment events, given 45 the highly transient nature of Cu. Thus it is meaningful to examine vortex ring circulations in a 46 systematic way by compositing numerous circulations, each treated independently. Wang and 47 Geerts (2013) used this approach to examine the characteristic vertical velocity profile in Cu 48 clouds by means of numerous profiling airborne radar transects and corresponding flight-level 49 dynamical information. That study focused on vertical velocity over the depth of the cloud. It did 50 not examine horizontal winds. This paper builds on Wang and Geerts (2013) through the use of 51 two-dimensional (2D) velocity data to identify and characterize circulation features within Cu 52 clouds. These flow-based entities then are spatially normalized and composited. Division of the 53 entire sample into subgroups allows inspection of the effect of ambient wind shear, evolutionary 54 stage, and other parameters on the vortex ring circulation. 55 Data sources and analysis method are introduced in Section 2. Section 3 describes the 56 characteristic composite structure of vortex ring circulations, and stratifies this as a function of 57 size and age of circulations and ambient wind shear. Further implications are discussed in 58 Section 4. Section 5 lists the main conclusions. 59 60 2. Data sources and analysis methods 61 a. Environment of the sampled cumulus clouds 62 A dataset of 91 vortex rings is used in this study, collected from 58 Cu clouds or Cu 63 clusters penetrated or overflown by the University of Wyoming King Air (UWKA) in two 2 64 campaigns: the High-plains Cu (HiCu) campaign sampled Cu clouds mostly over the Laramie 65 Range (mostly near Laramie Peak) in southeastern Wyoming in the summer of 2003 (Damiani et 66 al. 2006). And the Cu Photogrammetric, In-situ and Doppler Observations (CuPIDO) campaign 67 was conducted over the Santa Catalina Mountain range in southern Arizona in July and August 68 2006 (Damiani et al. 2008; Geerts et al. 2008). 69 Both campaigns targeted relatively isolated non-precipitating Cu mediocris in an 70 environment with little shear. The flight track orientation was either terrain-relative (e.g., 71 following a ridge allowing multiple penetrations in a row) or a “rosette” pattern with 120° 72 separations, to minimize the time between transects across a single Cu (Damiani et al. 2008). The 73 UWKA did not by design fly along the shear vector. Most sampled clouds in this study are 74 orographic Cu clouds whose spatial relation to other clouds is controlled by the details of the 75 terrain (Demko and Geerts 2010; Wang and Geerts 2011), rather than by shear. Most clouds 76 were observed over or near terrain ridges; one case, in HiCu, involves a rather isolated Cu cloud 77 over a broad valley, about 20 km from a terrain ridge, with deeper clouds over the adjacent 78 mountains. None of the targeted clouds were aligned in cloud streets according to GOES visible 79 satellite imagery (e.g., Fig. 2, Wang and Geerts 2011). The 13 HiCu clouds in this study tend to 80 be more ‘continental’ than the 45 more “monsoonal” CuPIDO clouds, since they generally have 81 a higher cloud droplet concentration, a higher cloud base, lower liquid water content (LWC), and 82 a smaller mean drop size compared to CuPIDO clouds (Wang and Geerts 2013). Still, the 83 sampled CuPIDO clouds occurred on days that were relatively dry in the Arizona monsoon 84 period, either without deep convection, or with deep convection erupting only later in the day. 85 Mobile GAUS (GPS Advanced Upper-air Sounding) radiosonde data are used to describe 86 the typical environment of the Cu clouds sampled during CuPIDO (Fig. 1). The cloud base, 3 87 estimated from the lifting condensation level (LCL), averages around 3.0 km MSL (Fig. 1b). By 88 contrast, the average LCL for the 13 HiCu clouds sampled on three flights is ~4.3 km MSL. This 89 is estimated from near-surface conditions upon take-off and landing in Laramie Wyoming, 90 within ~100 km of the clouds, since no proximity radiosonde data were collected in HiCu. 푑휃푒 91 Potential instability ( < 0, with e equivalent potential temperature and z height) is present 푑푧 92 from the surface to ~4.7 km MSL in the CuPIDO clouds (Fig. 1a). An air parcel rising from the 93 convective boundary layer and conserving its e, will become buoyant relative to the ambient air ∗ 94 at ~3.8 km MSL (e,surface = 휃푒 , the saturated e, since the parcel from the surface is saturated at 95 this level). This is slightly above the mean level of free convection (LFC), about 3.5 km MSL 96 (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Äikesega) Kaasnevad Ohtlikud Ilmanähtused
    TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL Eesti Mereakadeemia Merenduskeskus Veeteede lektoraat Raldo Täll RÜNKSAJUPILVEDEGA KAASNEVAD OHTLIKUD ILMANÄHTUSED LÄÄNEMEREL Lõputöö Juhendajad: Jüri Kamenik Lia Pahapill Tallinn 2016 SISUKORD SISUKORD ................................................................................................................................ 2 SÕNASTIK ................................................................................................................................ 4 SISSEJUHATUS ........................................................................................................................ 6 1. RÜNKSAJUPILVED JA ÄIKE ............................................................................................. 8 1.1. Äikese tekkimine ja areng ............................................................................................. 10 1.1.1. Äikese arengustaadiumid ........................................................................................ 11 1.2. Äikeste klassifikatsioon ................................................................................................. 14 1.2.1. Sünoptilise olukorra põhine liigitus ........................................................................ 14 1.2.2. Äikese seos tsüklonitega ......................................................................................... 15 1.2.3. Organiseerumispõhine liigitus ................................................................................ 16 2. RÜNKSAJUPILVEDEGA (ÄIKESEGA) KAASNEVAD OHTLIKUD ILMANÄHTUSED
    [Show full text]
  • Session 8.Pdf
    MARTIN SETVÁK [email protected] CZECH HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE ČESKÝ HYDROMETEOROLOGICKÝ ÚSTAV http://www.chmi.cz http://www.setvak.cz Anticipated benefits of improved temporal and spatial resolution (with focus on deep convective clouds) EUMeTrain Event Week on MTG-I Satellite, 7 – 11 November 2016 Martin Setvák version: 2016-11-11 Introduction The most significant impact of improved spatial resolution and shorter scan interval: observations (detection, monitoring, nowcasting, …) and studies of short-lived and small scale features or phenomena e.g. fires, valley fog, shallow convection, and tops of deep convective clouds (storms) – namely their overshooting tops Martin Setvák Introduction The most significant impact of improved spatial resolution and shorter scan interval: observations (detection, monitoring, nowcasting, …) and studies of short-lived and small scale features or phenomena e.g. fires, valley fog, shallow convection, and tops of deep convective clouds (storms) – namely their overshooting tops geometrical properties and characteristics (visible and near-IR bands), cloud microphysics, cloud-top brightness temperature (BT) Martin Setvák Overshooting tops definition and appearance OVERSHOOTING TOP (anvil dome, penetrating top): A domelike protrusion above a cumulonimbus anvil, representing the intrusion of an updraft through its equilibrium level (level of neutral buoyancy). It is usually a transient feature because the rising parcel's momentum acquired during its buoyant ascent carries it past the point where it is
    [Show full text]
  • Severe Weather in the United States
    Module 18: Severe Thunderstorms in the United States Tuscaloosa, Alabama May 18, 2011 Dan Koopman 2011 What is “Severe Weather”? Any meteorological condition that has potential to cause damage, serious social disruption, or loss of human life. American Meteorological Society: In general, any destructive storm, but usually applied to severe local storms in particular, that is, intense thunderstorms, hailstorms, and tornadoes. Three Stages of Thunderstorm Development Stage 1: Cumulus • A warm parcel of air begins ascending vertically into the atmosphere. • In an unstable environment, the parcel will continue to rise as long as it is warmer than the air around it. • Billowing, puffy Cumulus Congestus Clouds continue to build in towers. Stage 2: Mature • At a certain altitude, the parcel is no longer warmer than its environment. It is unable to rise any further and develops the distinctive “Anvil” shape as seen in this figure. • In cases of particularly strong updrafts, the vertical velocity of the updraft may be sufficient to penetrate this altitude causing an “overshooting top” to develop above the flat top of the anvil. Stage 3: Dissipating • Convective inflow shut off by strong downdrafts, no more cloud droplet formation, downdrafts continue and gradually weaken until light precipitation rains out • Water droplets aloft being to coalesce until they are too heavy to support and begin to fall to the surface, strengthening the downdraft. Basic Ingredients for Thunderstorms • Moisture • Unstable Air • Forcing Mechanism Moisture Thunderstorms development generally requires dewpoints > 50°F Unstable Air Stable is resistant to change. When the air is stable, even if a parcel of air is lifted above its original position (say by a mountain for example), its temperature will always remain cooler than its environment, meaning that it will resist upwards movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Flash Flooding
    NationalNational OceanicOceanic andand AtmosphericAtmospheric AdministrationAdministration (NOAA)(NOAA) NationalNational WeatherWeather ServiceService (NWS)(NWS) PresentsPresents SevereSevere WeatherWeather ObserverObserver andand SafetySafety TrainingTraining 20052005 Severe Weather Spotter Line 1-888-668-3344 Spotter Reports E-mail: www.crh.noaa.gov/espotter Homepage Address: www.crh.noaa.gov/iwx 2 GoalsGoals ofof thethe TrainingTraining You will learn: • Definitions of important weather terms and severe weather criteria • How thunderstorms develop and why some become severe • How to correctly identify cloud features that may or may not be associated with severe weather • What information the observer is to report and how to report it • Ways to receive weather information before and during severe weather events • Observer Safety! 3 WFOWFO NorthernNorthern IndianaIndiana (WFO(WFO IWX)IWX) CountyCounty WarningWarning andand ForecastForecast AreaArea (CWFA)(CWFA) Work with public, state and local officials Dedicated team of highly trained professionals 24 hours a day/7 days a week Prepare forecasts and warnings for 2.3 million people in 37 counties 4 SKYWARNSKYWARN (Severe(Severe Weather)Weather) ObserversObservers Why Are You Critical to NWS Operations? • Help overcome Doppler Radar limitations • Provide ground truth which can be correlated with radar signatures prior to, during, and after severe weather • Ground truth reports in warnings heighten public awareness and allow us to have confidence in our warning decisions 5 SKYWARNSKYWARN (Severe(Severe Weather)Weather) ObserversObservers Why Are You Critical to NWS Operations? • The NWS receives hundreds of reports of “False” or “Mis-Identified” funnel clouds and tornadoes each year • We strongly rely on the “2 out of 3” Rule before issuing a warning. Of the following, we like to have 2 out of 3 present before sending out a warning.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Severe Weather Terms
    Glossary of Severe Weather Terms -A- Anvil The flat, spreading top of a cloud, often shaped like an anvil. Thunderstorm anvils may spread hundreds of miles downwind from the thunderstorm itself, and sometimes may spread upwind. Anvil Dome A large overshooting top or penetrating top. -B- Back-building Thunderstorm A thunderstorm in which new development takes place on the upwind side (usually the west or southwest side), such that the storm seems to remain stationary or propagate in a backward direction. Back-sheared Anvil [Slang], a thunderstorm anvil which spreads upwind, against the flow aloft. A back-sheared anvil often implies a very strong updraft and a high severe weather potential. Beaver ('s) Tail [Slang], a particular type of inflow band with a relatively broad, flat appearance suggestive of a beaver's tail. It is attached to a supercell's general updraft and is oriented roughly parallel to the pseudo-warm front, i.e., usually east to west or southeast to northwest. As with any inflow band, cloud elements move toward the updraft, i.e., toward the west or northwest. Its size and shape change as the strength of the inflow changes. Spotters should note the distinction between a beaver tail and a tail cloud. A "true" tail cloud typically is attached to the wall cloud and has a cloud base at about the same level as the wall cloud itself. A beaver tail, on the other hand, is not attached to the wall cloud and has a cloud base at about the same height as the updraft base (which by definition is higher than the wall cloud).
    [Show full text]
  • Nowcasting Applications
    Nowcasting Applications African SWIFT Summer School Morné Gijben [email protected] Weather Research South African Weather Service Doc Ref no: RES-PPT-SWIFT-20190729-GIJ002-001.1 2020/01/10 1 What is the difference between nowcasting and forecasting? 2020/01/10 2 Definition of time ranges • Nowcasting: A description of current weather parameters and 0 to 2 hours’ description of forecast weather parameters • Very short-range weather forecasting: Up to 12 hours’ description of weather parameters • Short-range weather forecasting: Beyond 12 hours’ and up to 72 hours’ description of weather parameters • Medium-range weather forecasting: Beyond 72 hours’ and up to 240 hours’ description of weather parameters • Extended-range weather forecasting: Beyond 10 days’ and up to 30 days’ description of weather parameters. Usually averaged and expressed as a departure from climate values for that period 2020/01/10 3 Definition of time ranges • Long-range forecasting: From 30 days up to two years • Month forecast: Description of averaged weather parameters expressed as a departure (deviation, variation, anomaly) from climate values for that month at any lead-time • Seasonal forecast: Description of averaged weather parameters expressed as a departure from climate values for that season at any lead-time • Climate forecasting: Beyond two years • Climate variability prediction: Description of the expected climate parameters associated with the variation of interannual, decadal and multi-decadal climate anomalies • Climate prediction: Description
    [Show full text]
  • Objective Satellite-Based Detection of Overshooting Tops Using Infrared Window Channel Brightness Temperature Gradients
    VOLUME 49 JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010 Objective Satellite-Based Detection of Overshooting Tops Using Infrared Window Channel Brightness Temperature Gradients KRISTOPHER BEDKA,JASON BRUNNER,RICHARD DWORAK,WAYNE FELTZ, JASON OTKIN, AND THOMAS GREENWALD Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin (Manuscript received 19 May 2009, in final form 31 August 2009) ABSTRACT Deep convective storms with overshooting tops (OTs) are capable of producing hazardous weather con- ditions such as aviation turbulence, frequent lightning, heavy rainfall, large hail, damaging wind, and tor- nadoes. This paper presents a new objective infrared-only satellite OT detection method called infrared window (IRW)-texture. This method uses a combination of 1) infrared window channel brightness temper- ature (BT) gradients, 2) an NWP tropopause temperature forecast, and 3) OT size and BT criteria defined through analysis of 450 thunderstorm events within 1-km Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) imagery. Qualitative validation of the IRW-texture and the well-documented water vapor (WV) minus IRW BT difference (BTD) technique is performed using visible channel imagery, CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar, and/or Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) cloud-top height for selected cases. Quantitative validation of these two techniques is obtained though comparison with OT detections from synthetic satellite imagery derived from a cloud-resolving NWP simulation. The results show that the IRW-texture method false-alarm rate ranges from 4.2% to 38.8%, depending upon the magnitude of the overshooting and algo- rithm quality control settings.
    [Show full text]
  • PICTURE of the MONTH Some Frequently Overlooked Severe
    JUNE 2004 PICTURE OF THE MONTH 1529 PICTURE OF THE MONTH Some Frequently Overlooked Severe Thunderstorm Characteristics Observed on GOES Imagery: A Topic for Future Research JOHN F. W EAVER AND DAN LINDSEY NOAA/NESDIS/RAMM Team, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 23 October 2003 and 23 December 2003 ABSTRACT Several examples of Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) visible satellite images de- picting cloud features often associated with the transition to, or intensi®cation of, supercell thunderstorms are presented. The accompanying discussion describes what is known about these features, and what is left to learn. The examples are presented to increase awareness among meteorologists of these potentially signi®cant storm features. 1. Introduction dom 1976, 1983; Weaver 1980; Weaver and Nelson The role of satellite imagery in de®ning the near- 1982; Purdom and Sco®eld 1986; Weaver and Purdom storm environment of severe/tornadic thunderstorms has 1995; Browning et al. 1997; Weaver et al. 1994, 2000; been well documented over the past three decades (Pur- 2002; Bikos et al. 2002). Additionally, several papers have been written concerning storm-top characteristics of severe storms (Heyms®eld et al. 1983; McCann 1983; Corresponding author address: John F. Weaver, NOAA/NESDIS/ Adler and Mack 1986; SetvaÂk and Doswell 1991). Much RAMM, CIRA BuildingÐFoothills Campus, Colorado State Uni- versity, Fort Collins, CO 80523. less has been written concerning low-level,
    [Show full text]
  • Weather Spotter's Field Guide
    Weather Spotter’s Field Guide © Roger Edwards A Guide to Being a SKYWARN® Spotter U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service Ⓡ June 2011 The Spotter’s Role Section 1 The SKYWARN® Spotter and the Spotter’s Role The United States is the most severe weather- prone country in the world. Each year, people in this country cope with an average of 10,000 thunderstorms, 5,000 floods, 1,200 tornadoes, and two landfalling hurricanes. Approximately 90% of all presidentially Ⓡ declared disasters are weather-related, causing around 500 deaths each year and nearly $14 billion in damage. SKYWARN® is a National Weather Service (NWS) program developed in the 1960s that consists of trained weather spotters who provide reports of severe and hazardous weather to help meteorologists make life-saving warning decisions. Spotters are concerned citizens, amateur radio operators, truck drivers, mariners, airplane pilots, emergency management personnel, and public safety officials who volunteer their time and energy to report on hazardous weather impacting their community. Although, NWS has access to data from Doppler radar, satellite, and surface weather stations, technology cannot detect every instance of hazardous weather. Spotters help fill in the gaps by reporting hail, wind damage, flooding, heavy snow, tornadoes and waterspouts. Radar is an excellent tool, but it is just that: one tool among many that NWS uses. We need spotters to report how storms and other hydrometeorological phenomena are impacting their area. SKYWARN® spotter reports provide vital “ground truth” to the NWS. They act as our eyes and ears in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Weather Testbed – Final Evaluation
    Aviation Weather Testbed – Final Evaluation Project Title: 2014 GOES-R/JPSS Demonstration Organization: NOAA’s Aviation Weather Testbed (AWT) Evaluator(s): Aviation Weather Center (AWC) forecasters, Central Weather Service Unit (CWSU) forecasters, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) personnel, and general aviation personnel Duration of Evaluation: 1 February 2014 – 1 September 2014 Prepared By: Amanda Terborg (UW/CIMSS and NOAA/AWC) Final Submitted Date: 19 September 2014 Table of Contents Contents ...........................................................................................................................................1 1. Summary ......................................................................................................................................2 2. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................2 3. GOES-R Products Evaluated .......................................................................................................4 3.1 Aircraft Flight Icing Threat ........................................................................................................5 3.2 ACHA Cloud Algorithms ..........................................................................................................6 3.3 Convective Toolkit.....................................................................................................................8 3.3.1 GOES-R Convective Initiation ...................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Prmet Ch14 Thunderstorm Fundamentals
    Copyright © 2015 by Roland Stull. Practical Meteorology: An Algebra-based Survey of Atmospheric Science. 14 THUNDERSTORM FUNDAMENTALS Contents Thunderstorm Characteristics 481 Thunderstorm characteristics, formation, and Appearance 482 forecasting are covered in this chapter. The next Clouds Associated with Thunderstorms 482 chapter covers thunderstorm hazards including Cells & Evolution 484 hail, gust fronts, lightning, and tornadoes. Thunderstorm Types & Organization 486 Basic Storms 486 Mesoscale Convective Systems 488 Supercell Thunderstorms 492 INFO • Derecho 494 Thunderstorm Formation 496 ThundersTorm CharacterisTiCs Favorable Conditions 496 Key Altitudes 496 Thunderstorms are convective clouds INFO • Cap vs. Capping Inversion 497 with large vertical extent, often with tops near the High Humidity in the ABL 499 tropopause and bases near the top of the boundary INFO • Median, Quartiles, Percentiles 502 layer. Their official name is cumulonimbus (see Instability, CAPE & Updrafts 503 the Clouds Chapter), for which the abbreviation is Convective Available Potential Energy 503 Cb. On weather maps the symbol represents Updraft Velocity 508 thunderstorms, with a dot •, asterisk *, or triangle Wind Shear in the Environment 509 ∆ drawn just above the top of the symbol to indicate Hodograph Basics 510 rain, snow, or hail, respectively. For severe thunder- Using Hodographs 514 storms, the symbol is . Shear Across a Single Layer 514 Mean Wind Shear Vector 514 Total Shear Magnitude 515 Mean Environmental Wind (Normal Storm Mo- tion) 516 Supercell Storm Motion 518 Bulk Richardson Number 521 Triggering vs. Convective Inhibition 522 Convective Inhibition (CIN) 523 Triggers 525 Thunderstorm Forecasting 527 Outlooks, Watches & Warnings 528 INFO • A Tornado Watch (WW) 529 Stability Indices for Thunderstorms 530 Review 533 Homework Exercises 533 Broaden Knowledge & Comprehension 533 © Gene Rhoden / weatherpix.com Apply 534 Figure 14.1 Evaluate & Analyze 537 Air-mass thunderstorm.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Ice Particles in the Tropical Stratosphere from In-Situ Measurements
    Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 8, 19313–19355, 2008 Atmospheric www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/8/19313/2008/ Chemistry © Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under and Physics the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Discussions This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP if available. Evidence for ice particles in the tropical stratosphere from in-situ measurements M. de Reus1,2, S. Borrmann1,2, A. J. Heymsfield3, R. Weigel4, C. Schiller5, V. Mitev6, W. Frey2, D. Kunkel2, A. Kurten¨ 7, J. Curtius8, N. M. Sitnikov9, A. Ulanovsky9, and F. Ravegnani10 1Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Particle Chemistry Department, Mainz, Germany 2Institute for Atmospheric Physics, Mainz University, Germany 3National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, USA 4Laboratoire de Met´ eorologie´ Physique, Universite´ Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France 5Institute of Chemistry and Dynamics of the Geosphere, Research Centre Julich,¨ Germany 6Swiss Centre for Electronics and Microtechnology, Neuchatel,ˆ Switzerland 7Div. of Engineering and Applied Science California Inst. of Technology, Pasadena, Ca., USA 8Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, Goethe Univ. of Frankfurt, Germany 9Central Aerological Observatory, Dolgoprudny, Moskow Region, Russia 10Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Bologna, Italy Received: 19 August 2008 – Accepted: 24 September 2008 – Published: 14 November 2008 Correspondence to: M. de Reus ([email protected]) Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 19313 Abstract In-situ ice crystal size distribution measurements are presented within the tropical tro- posphere and lower stratosphere. The measurements were performed using a combi- nation of a Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe (FSSP-100) and a Cloud Imaging 5 Probe (CIP) which were installed on the Russian high altitude research aircraft M55 “Geophysica” during the SCOUT-O3 campaign in Darwin, Australia.
    [Show full text]