DOCSLIB.ORG

Prmet Ch14 Thunderstorm Fundamentals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prmet Ch14 Thunderstorm Fundamentals Copyright © 2015 by Roland Stull. Practical Meteorology: An Algebra-based Survey of Atmospheric Science. 14 THUNDERSTORM FUNDAMENTALS Contents Thunderstorm Characteristics 481 Thunderstorm characteristics, formation, and Appearance 482 forecasting are covered in this chapter. The next Clouds Associated with Thunderstorms 482 chapter covers thunderstorm hazards including Cells & Evolution 484 hail, gust fronts, lightning, and tornadoes. Thunderstorm Types & Organization 486 Basic Storms 486 Mesoscale Convective Systems 488 Supercell Thunderstorms 492 INFO • Derecho 494 Thunderstorm Formation 496 ThundersTorm CharacterisTiCs Favorable Conditions 496 Key Altitudes 496 Thunderstorms are convective clouds INFO • Cap vs. Capping Inversion 497 with large vertical extent, often with tops near the High Humidity in the ABL 499 tropopause and bases near the top of the boundary INFO • Median, Quartiles, Percentiles 502 layer. Their official name is cumulonimbus (see Instability, CAPE & Updrafts 503 the Clouds Chapter), for which the abbreviation is Convective Available Potential Energy 503 Cb. On weather maps the symbol represents Updraft Velocity 508 thunderstorms, with a dot •, asterisk *, or triangle Wind Shear in the Environment 509 ∆ drawn just above the top of the symbol to indicate Hodograph Basics 510 rain, snow, or hail, respectively. For severe thunder- Using Hodographs 514 storms, the symbol is . Shear Across a Single Layer 514 Mean Wind Shear Vector 514 Total Shear Magnitude 515 Mean Environmental Wind (Normal Storm Mo- tion) 516 Supercell Storm Motion 518 Bulk Richardson Number 521 Triggering vs. Convective Inhibition 522 Convective Inhibition (CIN) 523 Triggers 525 Thunderstorm Forecasting 527 Outlooks, Watches & Warnings 528 INFO • A Tornado Watch (WW) 529 Stability Indices for Thunderstorms 530 Review 533 Homework Exercises 533 Broaden Knowledge & Comprehension 533 © Gene Rhoden / weatherpix.com Apply 534 Figure 14.1 Evaluate & Analyze 537 Air-mass thunderstorm. Synthesize 542 “Practical Meteorology: An Algebra-based Survey of Atmospheric Science” by Roland Stull is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCom- mercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. View this license at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ . This work is available at http://www.eos.ubc.ca/books/Practical_Meteorology/ . 481 482 cHAPTer 14 • THUNDERSTORM FUNDAMENTALS B appearance BOWJM A mature thunderstorm cloud looks like a mush- VQESBGU room or anvil with a relatively large-diameter flat UPXFS top. The simplest thunderstorm (see Figs. 14.1 & [ SBJO 14.2) has a nearly vertical stem of diameter roughly EPXOESBGU equal to its depth (of order 10 to 15 km). The large top is called the anvil, anvil cloud, or thunder- Y head, and has the official name incus (Latin for USPQPQBVTF anvil). The anvil extends furthest in a direction as VQQFSMFWFM VQESBGU BOWJM blown by the upper-tropospheric winds. CVCCMF XJOET If the thunderstorm top is just starting to spread out into an anvil and does not yet have a fibrous or C DMPVEZ streaky appearance, then you identify the cloud as XBLF WJSHB cumulonimbus calvus (see the Clouds Chapter). For a storm with a larger anvil that looks strongly [ DMPVE CBTF BSDDMPVE glaciated (i.e., has a fibrous appearance associated BSDDMPVE HVTUGSPOU HVTUGSPOU with ice-crystal clouds), then you would call the QSFDJQJUBUJPO Y cloud a cumulonimbus capillatus. Within the stem of a mature thunderstorm is the cloudy main updraft tower topped by an updraft Z bubble (Fig. 14.2b). When this rising air hits the BOWJM tropopause, it spreads to make the anvil. Also in the stem is a downdraft with precipitation. When D the downdraft air hits the ground it spreads out, QSFDJQ the leading edge of which is called the gust front. When viewed from the ground under the storm, the VQQFS main updraft often has a darker cloud base, while MFWFM HVTUGSPOU the rainy region often looks not as dark and does not XJOET BUTVSGBDF have a well-defined cloud base. Y Not all cumulonimbus clouds have lightning and thunder. Such storms are technically not thun- Figure 14.2 derstorms. However, in this book we will use the (a) Sketch of a basic (airmass) thunderstorm in its mature stage. (b) Vertical slice through the storm. Light shading indicates word thunderstorm to mean any cumulonimbus clouds, medium and dark shadings are moderate and heavy pre- cloud, regardless of whether it has lightning. cipitation, and arrows show air motion. (c) Horizontal com- More complex thunderstorms can have one or posite, showing the anvil at storm top (as viewed from above by more updraft and downdraft regions. The most se- satellite), the precipitation in the low-to-middle levels (as viewed vere, long-lasting, less-frequent thunderstorms are by radar), and the gust front of spreading winds at the surface. supercell thunderstorms (Figs. 14.3 & 14.4). Clouds associated with Thunderstorms Sometimes you can see other clouds attached to thunderstorms, such as a funnel, wall, mammatus, arc, shelf, flanking line, scud, pileus, dome, and bea- ver tail (Fig. 14.4). Not all thunderstorms have all these associated clouds. Arc clouds (official name arcus, Fig. 14.2b) or shelf clouds form near the ground in boundary- layer air that is forced upward by undercutting cold air flowing out from the thunderstorm. These cloud bands mark the leading edge of gust-front outflow from the rear-flank downdraft (Fig. 14.4), usually associated with the flanking line. Often the un- dersides of arc clouds are dark and turbulent-look- ing, while their tops are smooth. Not all gust fronts © Gene Rhoden / weatherpix.com Figure 14.3 have arc clouds, particularly if the displaced air is Photo of supercell thunderstorm. dry. See the Thunderstorm Hazards chapter. R. STULL • PRACTICAL METEOROLOGY 483 The beaver tail (Fig. 14.4) is a smooth, flat, 0WFSTIPPUJOH5PQPS 1JMFVT narrow, low-altitude cloud that extends along the %PNF &- boundary between the inflow of warm moist air to "OWJM the thunderstorm and the cold air from the rain-in- .BNNBUVT duced forward flank downdraft (FFD). .BJO A dome of overshooting clouds sometimes 1JMFVT 6QESBGU [ forms above the anvil top, above the region of stron- $V 7JSHB $VNFE gest updraft. This is caused by the inertia of the up- DPO 4USJBUJPOT ward moving air in the main updraft, which over- 'MBOLJOH-JOF #FBWFS5BJM -$- shoots above its neutrally buoyant equilibrium level (EL). Storms that have overshooting tops 3BJO are often more violent and turbulent. 48 4DVE /& The flanking line is a band of cumuliform 8BMM$MPVE 5BJM$MPVE clouds that increase from the medium-size cumu- lus mediocris (Cu med) furthest from the storm 'VOOFM$MPVE to the taller cumulus congestus (Cu con) close PS5PSOBEP to the main updraft. Cumulus congestus are also Figure 14.4a informally called towering cumulus (TCu). The Sketch of a classic supercell thunderstorm (Cb) as might be flanking line forms along and above the gust front, viewed looking toward the northwest in central North America. which marks the leading edge of colder outflow air The storm would move from left to right in this view (i.e., to- from the rear-flank downdraft (RFD). ward the northeast). Many storms have only a subset of the If humid layers of environmental air exist above features cataloged here. Cu med = cumulus mediocris; Cu con rapidly rising cumulus towers, then pileus clouds = cumulus congestus; LCL = lifting condensation level; EL = can form as the environmental air is pushed up and equilibrium level (often near the tropopause, 8 to 15 km above out of the way of the rising cumulus clouds. Pileus ground); NE = northeast; SW = southwest. are often very short lived because the rising cloud tower that caused it often keeps rising through the pileus and obliterates it. The most violent thunderstorms are called 4UPSN supercell storms (Figs. 14.3 & 14.4), and usu- "OWJMFEHF ally have a quasi-steady rotating updraft (called a .PWFNFOU mesocyclone). The main thunderstorm updraft 'PSXBSE'MBOL %PXOESBGU in supercells sometimes has curved, helical cloud striations (grooves or ridges) on its outside similar 3BJO ''% 3BJO #FBWFS5BJM to threads of a screw (Fig. 14.4a). Supercells can pro- duce intense tornadoes (violently rotating columns 3FBS'MBOL 5 of air), which can appear out of the bottom of an iso- %PXOESBGU .BJO lated cylindrical lowering of the cloud base called a 3'% 6QESBGU wall cloud. The portion of the tornado made vis- 0VUGMPX 5 ible by cloud droplets is called the funnel cloud, #PVOEBSZ which is the name given to tornadoes not touching -BZFS -JOF 8JOET $V the ground. Tornadoes are covered in the next chap- DPO *OGMPX #PVOEBSZ ter. Most thunderstorms are not supercell storms, 'MBOLJOH$V -BZFS and most supercell storms do not have tornadoes. NFE 8JOET Attached to the base of the wall cloud is some- (VTU'SPOU times a short, horizontal cloud called a tail cloud, /PSUI which points towards the forward flank precipi- tation area. Ragged cloud fragments called scud &BTU LN WJFXQPJOU (cumulus fractus) often form near the tip of the tail Figure 14.4b cloud and are drawn quickly into the tail and the Plan view (top down) sketch of a classic supercell thunder- wall cloud by strong winds. storm. T indicates possible tornado positions; RFD = Rear The wall cloud and tornado are usually near Flank Downdraft; FFD = Forward Flank Downdraft. Regions the boundary between cold downdraft air and the of updraft are hatched with grey; downdrafts are solid black; low-level warm moist inflow air, under a somewhat rain is solid light grey. Low surface pressure is found under the rain-free cloud base. In mesocyclone storms, you updrafts (especially near the “T” locations), and high pressure can see the wall cloud rotate by eye, while rotation under the downdrafts. Vectors are near-surface winds: cold are black, warm are grey. From the view point you see Fig. 14.4a. 484 cHAPTer 14 • THUNDERSTORM FUNDAMENTALS of the larger-diameter supercell is slower and is ap- parent only in time-lapse movies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Local Large Hail Probability Equation for Columbia, Sc
    EASTERN REGION TECHNICAL ATTACHMENT NO. 98-6 AUGUST, 1998 A LOCAL LARGE HAIL PROBABILITY EQUATION FOR COLUMBIA, SC Mark DeLisi NOAA/National Weather Service Forecast Office West Columbia, SC Editor’s Note: The author’s current affiliation is NWSFO Mt. Holly, NJ. 1. INTRODUCTION Skew-T/Hodograph Analysis and Research Program, or SHARP (Hart and Korotky Billet et al. (1997) derived a successful 1991). The dependent variable, hail diameter probability of large hail (diameter greater than or the absence of hail, was derived from or equal to 0.75 inch) equation as an aid in spotter reports for the CAE warning area from National Weather Service (NWS) severe May, 1995 through September, 1996. There thunderstorm warning operations. Hail of that were 136 cases used to develop the regression diameter or larger requires a severe equation. thunderstorm warning be issued by NWS offices. Shortly thereafter, a Weather The LPLH was verified using 69 spotter Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR- reports from the period September, 1996 88D) radar probability of severe hail (POSH) through September, 1997. The POSH was became available for warning operations (Witt verified as well. Verification statistics et al. 1998). This study recreates the steps included the Brier score and the chi-square taken in Billet et al. (1997) to derive a local (32) statistic. probability of large hail equation (LPLH) for the Columbia, SC National Weather Service The goal of this study was to develop an Forecast Office (CAE) warning area, and it objective method to estimate the probability assesses the utility of the LPLH relative to the of large hail for use in forecast operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 7. More on BL Wind Profiles and Turbulent Eddy Structures in This
    Atm S 547 Boundary Layer Meteorology Bretherton Lecture 7. More on BL wind profiles and turbulent eddy structures In this lecture… • Stability and baroclinicity effects on PBL wind and temperature profiles • Large-eddy structures and entrainment in shear-driven and convective BLs. Stability effects on overall boundary layer structure Above the surface layer, the wind profile is also affected by stability. As we mentioned previously, unstable BLs tend to have much more well-mixed wind profiles than stable BLs. Fig. 1 shows observations from the Wangara experiment on how the velocity defects and temperature profile are altered by BL stability (as measured by H/L). Within stability classes, the velocity profiles collapse when scaled with a velocity scale u* and the observed BL depth H, but there is a large difference between the stability classes. Baroclinicity We would expect baroclinicity (vertical shear of geostrophic wind) to also affect the observed wind profile. This is most easily seen for a laminar steady-state Ekman layer in a geostrophic wind with constant vertical shear ug(z) = (G + Mz, Nz), where M = -(g/fT0)∂T/∂y, N = (g/fT0)∂T/∂x. The momentum equations and BCs are: -f(v - Nz) = ν d2u/dz2 f(u - G - Mz) = ν d2v/dz2 u(0) = 0, u(z) ~ G + Mz as z → ∞. v(0) = 0, v(z) ~ Nz as z → ∞. The resultant BL velocity profile is the classical Ekman layer with the thermal wind added onto it. u(z) = G(1 - e-ζ cos ζ) + Mz, (7.1) 1/2 v(z) = G e- ζ sin ζ + Nz.
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Convective Self-Aggregation Affect Precipitation Extremes?
    EGU21-5216 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-5216 EGU General Assembly 2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. How does convective self-aggregation affect precipitation extremes? Nicolas Da Silva1, Sara Shamekh2, Caroline Muller2, and Benjamin Fildier2 1Centre for Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom 2Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (LMD)/Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL), École Normale Supérieure, Paris Sciences & Lettres (PSL) Research University, Sorbonne Université, École Polytechnique, CNRS, Paris, France Convective organisation has been associated with extreme precipitation in the tropics. Here we investigate the impact of convective self-aggregation on extreme rainfall rates. We find that convective self-aggregation significantly increases precipitation extremes, for 3-hourly accumulations but also for instantaneous rates (+ 30 %). We show that this latter enhanced instantaneous precipitation is mainly due to the local increase in relative humidity which drives larger accretion efficiency and lower re-evaporation and thus a higher precipitation efficiency. An in-depth analysis based on an adapted scaling of precipitation extremes, reveals that the dynamic contribution decreases (- 25 %) while the thermodynamic is slightly enhanced (+ 5 %) with convective aggregation, leading to lower condensation rates (- 20 %). When the atmosphere is more organized into a moist convecting region, and a dry convection-free region, deep convective updrafts are surrounded by a warmer environment which reduces convective instability and thus the dynamic contribution. The moister boundary-layer explains the positive thermodynamic contribution. The microphysic contribution is increased by + 50 % with aggregation. The latter is partly due to reduced evaporation of rain falling through a moister near-cloud environment (+ 30 %), but also to the associated larger accretion efficiency (+ 20 %).
    [Show full text]
  • Soaring Weather
    Chapter 16 SOARING WEATHER While horse racing may be the "Sport of Kings," of the craft depends on the weather and the skill soaring may be considered the "King of Sports." of the pilot. Forward thrust comes from gliding Soaring bears the relationship to flying that sailing downward relative to the air the same as thrust bears to power boating. Soaring has made notable is developed in a power-off glide by a conven­ contributions to meteorology. For example, soar­ tional aircraft. Therefore, to gain or maintain ing pilots have probed thunderstorms and moun­ altitude, the soaring pilot must rely on upward tain waves with findings that have made flying motion of the air. safer for all pilots. However, soaring is primarily To a sailplane pilot, "lift" means the rate of recreational. climb he can achieve in an up-current, while "sink" A sailplane must have auxiliary power to be­ denotes his rate of descent in a downdraft or in come airborne such as a winch, a ground tow, or neutral air. "Zero sink" means that upward cur­ a tow by a powered aircraft. Once the sailcraft is rents are just strong enough to enable him to hold airborne and the tow cable released, performance altitude but not to climb. Sailplanes are highly 171 r efficient machines; a sink rate of a mere 2 feet per second. There is no point in trying to soar until second provides an airspeed of about 40 knots, and weather conditions favor vertical speeds greater a sink rate of 6 feet per second gives an airspeed than the minimum sink rate of the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • American Meteorological Society Revised Manuscript Click Here to Download Manuscript (Non-Latex): JAMC-D-14-0252 Revision3.Docx
    AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology EARLY ONLINE RELEASE This is a preliminary PDF of the author-produced manuscript that has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. Since it is being posted so soon after acceptance, it has not yet been copyedited, formatted, or processed by AMS Publications. This preliminary version of the manuscript may be downloaded, distributed, and cited, but please be aware that there will be visual differences and possibly some content differences between this version and the final published version. The DOI for this manuscript is doi: 10.1175/JAMC-D-14-0252.1 The final published version of this manuscript will replace the preliminary version at the above DOI once it is available. If you would like to cite this EOR in a separate work, please use the following full citation: Wang, Y., and B. Geerts, 2015: Vertical-plane dual-Doppler radar observations of cumulus toroidal circulations. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol. doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-14- 0252.1, in press. © 2015 American Meteorological Society Revised manuscript Click here to download Manuscript (non-LaTeX): JAMC-D-14-0252_revision3.docx Vertical-plane dual-Doppler radar observations of cumulus toroidal circulations Yonggang Wang1, and Bart Geerts University of Wyoming Submitted to J. Appl. Meteor. Climat. October 2014 Revised version submitted in May 2015 1 Corresponding author address: Yonggang Wang, Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie WY 82071, USA; email: [email protected] 1 Profiling dual-Doppler radar observations of cumulus toroidal circulations 2 3 Abstract 4 5 6 High-resolution vertical-plane dual-Doppler velocity data, collected by an airborne profiling 7 cloud radar in transects across non-precipitating orographic cumulus clouds, are used to examine 8 vortical circulations near cloud top.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art and Science of Forecasting Morning Temperature Inversions by Anthony J
    Air Quality Forecasting Excl usive Con tent The Art and Science of Forecasting Morning Temperature Inversions by Anthony J. Sadar Anthony J. Sadar is a Certified Consulting Meteorologist and Air Pollution Administrator with the Allegheny County Health Department, Air Quality Program in Pittsburgh, PA. E-mail: [email protected]. The author provides an overview of the key resources and variables used to produce morning surface air inversion forecasts in Pittsburgh, PA. Although the focus is southwestern Pennsylvania, the forecasting approach can be applied to similar locations across the globe. Air quality in southwestern Pennsylvania, as in most other areas of the Accurate forecasting of the onset of an inversion would benefit areas world, is very much influenced by surface-based temperature inver - prone to strong and/or persistent inversions. Advanced notice of im - sions. An atmospheric temperature inversion occurs when air temper - pending stagnant air conditions would give government regulators, ature increases with increasing height. In the layer of air nearest the industry operators, and the public time to mitigate emissions, and earth’s surface—the troposphere—this situation is the inverse of the hence, pollutant concentrations, as well as reduce exposure to “normal” condition where a warm ground keeps low-lying air warmer elevated pollution levels. than air higher up. Normally then, the warm surface air can rise and the cool air aloft can descend, causing the atmosphere to mix. Detecting Inversions To collect temperature, wind, and other data with height, the National A surface-based (or ground-level) temperature inversion forms Weather Service (NWS) releases a balloon-borne measurement trans - when air close to the ground cools faster than air at a higher altitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Studies of Turbulent Mixing J.A
    Laboratory Studies of Turbulent Mixing J.A. Whitehead Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA Laboratory measurements are required to determine the rates of turbulent mixing and dissipation within flows of stratified fluid. Rates based on other methods (theory, numerical approaches, and direct ocean measurements) require models based on assumptions that are suggested, but not thoroughly verified in the laboratory. An exception to all this is recently provided by direct numerical simulations (DNS) mentioned near the end of this article. Experiments have been conducted with many different devices. Results span a wide range of gradient or bulk Richardson number and more limited ranges of Reynolds number and Schmidt number, which are the three most relevant dimensionless numbers. Both layered and continuously stratified flows have been investigated, and velocity profiles include smooth ones, jets, and clusters of eddies from stirrers or grids. The dependence of dissipation through almost all ranges of Richardson number is extensively documented. The buoyancy flux ratio is the turbulent kinetic energy loss from raising the potential energy of the strata to loss of kinetic energy by viscous dissipation. It rises from zero at small Richardson number to values of about 0.1 at Richardson number equal to 1, and then falls off for greater values. At Richardson number greater than 1, a wide range of power laws spanning the range from −0.5 to −1.5 are found to fit data for different experiments. Considerable layering is found at larger values, which causes flux clustering and may explain both the relatively large scatter in the data as well as the wide range of proposed power laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Use Style: Paper Title
    Environmental Conditions Producing Thunderstorms with Anomalous Vertical Polarity of Charge Structure Donald R. MacGorman Alexander J. Eddy NOAA/Nat’l Severe Storms Laboratory & Cooperative Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies Studies Affiliation/ Univ. of Oklahoma and NOAA/OAR Norman, Oklahoma, USA Norman, Oklahoma, USA [email protected] Earle Williams Cameron R. Homeyer Massachusetts Insitute of Technology School of Meteorology, Univ. of Oklhaoma Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA Norman, Oklahoma, USA Abstract—+CG flashes typically comprise an unusually large Tessendorf et al. 2007, Weiss et al. 2008, Fleenor et al. 2009, fraction of CG activity in thunderstorms with anomalous vertical Emersic et al. 2011; DiGangi et al. 2016). Furthermore, charge structure. We analyzed more than a decade of NLDN previous studies have suggested that CG activity tends to be data on a 15 km x 15 km x 15 min grid spanning the contiguous delayed tens of minutes longer in these anomalous storms than United States, to identify storm cells in which +CG flashes in most storms elsewhere (MacGorman et al. 2011). constituted a large fraction of CG activity, as a proxy for thunderstorms with anomalous vertical charge structure, and For this study, we analyzed more than a decade of CG data storm cells with very low percentages of +CG lightning, as a from the National Lightning Detection Network throughout the proxy for thunderstorms with normal-polarity distributions. In contiguous United States to identify storm cells in which +CG each of seven regions, we used North American Regional flashes constituted a large fraction of CG activity, as a proxy Reanalysis data to compare the environments of anomalous for storms with anomalous vertical charge structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Between Observed Convective Cloud-Base Heights and Lifting Condensation Level for Two Different Lifted Parcels
    AUGUST 2002 NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE 885 Comparison between Observed Convective Cloud-Base Heights and Lifting Condensation Level for Two Different Lifted Parcels JEFFREY P. C RAVEN AND RYAN E. JEWELL NOAA/NWS/Storm Prediction Center, Norman, Oklahoma HAROLD E. BROOKS NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma 6 January 2002 and 16 April 2002 ABSTRACT Approximately 400 Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS) observations of convective cloud-base heights at 2300 UTC were collected from April through August of 2001. These observations were compared with lifting condensation level (LCL) heights above ground level determined by 0000 UTC rawinsonde soundings from collocated upper-air sites. The LCL heights were calculated using both surface-based parcels (SBLCL) and mean-layer parcels (MLLCLÐusing mean temperature and dewpoint in lowest 100 hPa). The results show that the mean error for the MLLCL heights was substantially less than for SBLCL heights, with SBLCL heights consistently lower than observed cloud bases. These ®ndings suggest that the mean-layer parcel is likely more representative of the actual parcel associated with convective cloud development, which has implications for calculations of thermodynamic parameters such as convective available potential energy (CAPE) and convective inhibition. In addition, the median value of surface-based CAPE (SBCAPE) was more than 2 times that of the mean-layer CAPE (MLCAPE). Thus, caution is advised when considering surface-based thermodynamic indices, despite the assumed presence of a well-mixed afternoon boundary layer. 1. Introduction dry-adiabatic temperature pro®le (constant potential The lifting condensation level (LCL) has long been temperature in the mixed layer) and a moisture pro®le used to estimate boundary layer cloud heights (e.g., described by a constant mixing ratio.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Layer Verification
    Boundary Layer Verification ECMWF training course April 2015 Maike Ahlgrimm Aim of this lecture • To give an overview over strategies for boundary layer evaluation • By the end of this session you should be able to: – Identify data sources and products suitable for BL verification – Recognize the strengths and limitations of the verification strategies discussed – Choose a suitable verification method to investigate model errors in boundary layer height, transport and cloudiness. smog over NYC Overview • General strategy for process-oriented model evaluation • What does the BL parameterization do? • Broad categories of BL parameterizations • Which aspects of the BL can we evaluate? – What does each aspect tell us about the BL? • What observations are available – What are the observations’ advantages and limitations? • Examples – Clear convective BL – Cloud topped convective BL – Stable BL Basic strategy for model evaluation and improvement: Observations Identify discrepancy Model Output Figure out source of model error Improve parameterization When and where does error occur? Which parameterization(s) is/are involved? What does the BL parameterization do? Attempts to integrate Turbulence transports effects of small scale temperature, moisture and turbulent motion on momentum (+tracers). prognostic variables at grid resolution. Stull 1988 Ultimate goal: good model forecast and realistic BL Broad categories of BL parameterizations Unified BL schemes Specialized BL scheme •Attempt to integrate BL (and •One parameterization for each shallow cloud) effects in one discrete BL type scheme to allow seamless transition •Simplifies parameterization for •Often statistical schemes (i.e. each type, parameterization for making explicit assumptions about each type ideally suited PDFs of modelled variables) using •Limitation: must identify BL type moist-conserved variables reliably, is noisy (lots of if •Limitation: May not work well for statements) mixed-phase or ice •Example: Met-Office (Lock et al.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Computation of Planetary Boundary-Layer Height Using the Bulk Richardson Number Method
    Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2599–2611, 2014 www.geosci-model-dev.net/7/2599/2014/ doi:10.5194/gmd-7-2599-2014 © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. On the computation of planetary boundary-layer height using the bulk Richardson number method Y. Zhang1, Z. Gao2, D. Li3, Y. Li1, N. Zhang4, X. Zhao1, and J. Chen1,5 1International Center for Ecology, Meteorology & Environment, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Agricultural Meteorology, College of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China 2State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China 3Program of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA 4School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China 5Department of Geography, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA Correspondence to: Z. Gao ([email protected]) Received: 15 March 2014 – Published in Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss.: 24 June 2014 Revised: 12 September 2014 – Accepted: 22 September 2014 – Published: 10 November 2014 Abstract. Experimental data from four field campaigns are 1 Introduction used to explore the variability of the bulk Richardson num- ber of the entire planetary boundary layer (PBL), Ribc, which The planetary boundary layer (PBL), or the atmospheric is a key parameter for calculating the PBL height (PBLH) boundary layer, is the lowest part of the atmosphere that is in numerical weather and climate models with the bulk directly influenced by earth’s surface and has significant im- Richardson number method. First, the PBLHs of three differ- pacts on weather, climate, and the hydrologic cycle (Stull, ent thermally stratified boundary layers (i.e., strongly stable 1988; Garratt, 1992; Seidel et al., 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 09/29/21 11:17 PM UTC 4144 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 128 Ferentiate Among Our Concerns About the Application of TABLE 1
    DECEMBER 2000 NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE 4143 The Intricacies of Instabilities DAVID M. SCHULTZ NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma PHILIP N. SCHUMACHER NOAA/National Weather Service, Sioux Falls, South Dakota CHARLES A. DOSWELL III NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma 19 April 2000 and 30 May 2000 ABSTRACT In response to Sherwood's comments and in an attempt to restore proper usage of terminology associated with moist instability, the early history of moist instability is reviewed. This review shows that many of Sherwood's concerns about the terminology were understood at the time of their origination. De®nitions of conditional instability include both the lapse-rate de®nition (i.e., the environmental lapse rate lies between the dry- and the moist-adiabatic lapse rates) and the available-energy de®nition (i.e., a parcel possesses positive buoyant energy; also called latent instability), neither of which can be considered an instability in the classic sense. Furthermore, the lapse-rate de®nition is really a statement of uncertainty about instability. The uncertainty can be resolved by including the effects of moisture through a consideration of the available-energy de®nition (i.e., convective available potential energy) or potential instability. It is shown that such misunderstandings about conditional instability were likely due to the simpli®cations resulting from the substitution of lapse rates for buoyancy in the vertical acceleration equation. Despite these valid concerns about the value of the lapse-rate de®nition of conditional instability, consideration of the lapse rate and moisture separately can be useful in some contexts (e.g., the ingredients-based methodology for forecasting deep, moist convection).
    [Show full text]