DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Syea Emma 0800 430 Ethesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 Syea Emma 0800 430 Ethesis This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Self-Regulation and Reinterpretation in the Nietzschean Self Syea, Emma Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 26. Sep. 2021 Self-Regulation and Reinterpretation in the Nietzschean Self Emma Syea A Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy February 2018 1 Abstract of the Thesis This thesis examines Nietzsche’s model of subjectivity, with a particular focus on the process of self-regulation. Self-regulation is to be understood as the maintenance of the psychological stability or ‘well-being’ of an individual, especially in the face of adverse circumstances. I suggest that self-regulation provides us with a more intelligible means of exploring the philosophical psychology Nietzsche provides than self-formation. The reason for this is twofold: (i) self-regulation is a phenomenon exhibited by all individuals, not just elite, ‘higher’ types, who are singled out by Nietzsche, as being capable of the task of self-formation, and (ii) we can identify distinct psychological mechanisms involved in this process of self-regulation, in contrast to the somewhat obscure notion of ‘becoming what you are’. The thesis explores key psychological mechanisms involved in regulating a self, namely forgetting, autobiographical memory, and self-deception. The capacities implicated in these regulatory processes can be seen to possess a different functional profile to that of a drive or an affect. The thesis thus supplements current drive-based accounts which have so far dominated discussions of Nietzsche’s model of the self, by further exploring different structures within the self, and their operations. Outlining the interactions between these regulatory capacities, and the drives and affects, enables us to have a richer understanding of how a self may develop itself through interpretation, incorporation, and extirpation. Finally, the thesis offers a taxonomy of the characteristics of self-regulation by triangulating this notion with Nietzsche’s concept of health. This will show how self-regulation can be linked with marks of Nietzschean health such as incorporation, providing a necessary condition for self-formation in strong, artistic, ‘higher’ types. However, the thesis will also show that self-regulation can come apart from health, concluding that self-regulation emerges as a necessary but not sufficient condition for the higher ideal of health. 2 Acknowledgements To paraphrase a friend’s wise advice: ‘no PhD thesis was ever written by just sitting alone at a desk, scribbling down some notes. Unless you’re Kant.’ I can confirm that, from my experience at least, this certainly rings true. Thanks first and foremost to my supervisor Sacha Golob. I could not have asked for a better supervisor and mentor. He has supervised me through an undergraduate degree (dealing with hapless essays written on Kantian metaphysics!), a masters degree, and now the PhD, going above and beyond what is required from a supervisor at each stage. Sacha has taught me so much more than how to grapple with Nietzsche’s thought: I have learnt what it means to be a philosopher and a teacher. I cannot thank you enough. I am very grateful to my second supervisor Michael Silk for countless inspiring conversations about Nietzsche, and for advice and encouragement throughout the project. Thank you to Eliot Michaelson who worked on the project with me for a year. Eliot helped me to find the puzzles in Nietzsche, and made trying to solve them less daunting. I have benefited enormously from conversations and written feedback from the following people: Manuel Dries, Fabrice Teroni, Tom Stern, Andrew Huddleston and Ken Gemes. Thank you all for providing interesting and invaluable perspectives on my work. I have been fortunate enough to be a member of a welcoming and collaborate department, something which has made all the difference during this process. Thanks to Clare Moriarty, Paul Doody, Matt Bodle, John Wright, and Mike Coxhead in particular. Thank you to Rod and Sonja Nash who have not stopped encouraging me, and showing an interest in my academic career since my very first German lesson at school, aged twelve. Introducing me to the German language opened the door to a wealth of literature and philosophy, including, of course, Nietzsche. I could not have done the PhD without good friends around me – you have encouraged, supported, and generally put up with me through the ups and downs! 3 Thanks to: The good doctor Charlie Bell, my Nietzscheans Matthew Dennis, Sander Werkhoven, and Lorenzo Serini, and my Kantian Paola Romero, my departmental partner in crime Vanessa Brassey, and my Epistemologist extraordinaire Giada Fratantonio, and to all the usual suspects: Nick Rutter, Elizabeth Gourd, Emma Obertelli, Anvita Sharma, Alison McGarvey, Christine Good, Sam Scarpa, Alex Clarke, Laura Silva, Ashleigh Ellis, Sam Shetabi, and Adam Dickson. You have all provided much needed moments of sanity and laughter. I am lucky to have you all. And thank you to Ian Jakeway for the adventures. Finally, thank you to my parents for always supporting me and never doubting me. 4 Table of Contents Abstract of the Thesis ................................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 i. The Project........................................................................................................................................... 8 ii. Methodological Preliminaries .................................................................................................... 10 iii. Thesis Outline .............................................................................................................................. 11 1. Nietzsche and The Self ...................................................................................................................... 17 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 17 Preliminaries ............................................................................................................................................. 18 1.1 The Naturalistic Account (Leiter 2002) .................................................................................. 19 The Transcendental Account (Gardner 2009) ............................................................................. 27 1.2 Conscious Willing (Katsafanas 2012) ...................................................................................... 31 Perspectival Knowing (Janaway 2009) .......................................................................................... 40 1.3 Autonomy and Agency (Gemes 2009) ..................................................................................... 48 Repository Self (Anderson 2012) ..................................................................................................... 52 1.4 Evaluation of the Debate ............................................................................................................... 59 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................. 61 2. Nietzschean Forgetting and Reinterpretation ........................................................................ 62 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 62 2.1 The ‘Paradox’ of Active Forgetting ............................................................................................ 66 2.2 How to Understand Nietzschean Forgetting ........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Year 12 SELF Cognition Memory
    Year 12 SELF Cognition Memory U3ATPSY Except where indicated, this content © Department of Education Western Australia 2020 and released under Creative Commons CC BY NC Before re-purposing any third party content in this resource refer to the owner of that content for permission. Year 12 SELF | Cognition Memory | © Department of Education WA 2020 U3ATPSY Year 12 SELF – Cognition Memory Syllabus points covered: • psychological concepts and processes associated with memory and their relationship to behaviour • multi store model of memory – Atkinson and Shiffrin, 1968 • sensory register o duration, capacity, encoding • short-term memory (working memory) o duration, capacity and encoding o working memory model – Baddeley and Hitch, 1974 • long-term memory o duration, capacity and encoding o procedural memory o declarative memory – semantic and episodic • recall, recognition, re-learning • forgetting: retrieval failure, interference, motivated forgetting, decay. Instructions: Carefully read and make notes on the following material. Complete all activities. Except where indicated, this content © Department of Education Western Australia 2020 and released under Creative Commons CC BY NC Before re-purposing any third party content in this resource refer to the owner of that content for permission. 1 U3ATPSY MEMORY Memory is the organisation, storage and retrieval of information. There are three main ways of measuring what a person has remembered: • recall – retrieving information from memory without prompts • recognition – identifying information from a number of alternatives (recognition is easier than recall – e.g. multiple choice questions easier than short answer questions) • relearning – involves relearning information previously learned. If the information is learned quickly it is assumed that some information has been retained from previous learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Internal States Shape Memory Retrieval Hannah Tarder-Stoll1†*, Manasi Jayakumar1†*, Halle R
    Dynamic internal states shape memory retrieval Hannah Tarder-Stoll1†*, Manasi Jayakumar1†*, Halle R. Dimsdale-Zucker1, Eren Günseli1, Mariam Aly1,2 1Department oF Psychology, Columbia University 2AfFiliate Member, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University Abstract Why do we sometimes easily retrieve memories, but other times appear to Forget them? We oFten look to our external environment For retrieval cues, but another way to optimize memory retrieval is to be in a mental state, or mode, that prioritizes access to our internal representation oF the world. Such a ‘retrieval mode’ was proposed by Endel Tulving (1983), who considered it a neurocognitive state in which one keeps the goal oF memory retrieval in mind. Building on Tulving’s proposal, we review converging evidence From multiple lines oF research that emphasize the importance oF internal states in the instantiation oF retrieval modes that optimize successful remembering. We identiFy three key Factors that contribute to a retrieval mode by modulating either the likelihood or the content oF retrieval: (1) an intention to remember or Forget (either in the present or the Future), (2) attentional selection oF goal-relevant memories and suppression oF distractors, and (3) Fluctuating levels oF acetylcholine in the hippocampus. We discuss empirical evidence that these internal states individually inFluence memory retrieval and propose how they may interact synergistically. Characterizing these dynamic internal Factors may be a key to unlocking our understanding oF the organization and accessibility oF our memories. Keywords: episodic memory; goal states; neuromodulation; goal-directed attention; medial temporal lobe; preFrontal cortex * These authors contributed equally to this work † Corresponding authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Motivated to “Forget”
    Article Social Psychological and Personality Science 4(6) 730-737 Motivated to ‘‘Forget’’: The Effects of ª The Author(s) 2013 Reprints and permission: In-Group Wrongdoing on Memory and sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1948550613482986 Collective Guilt spps.sagepub.com Katie N. Rotella1 and Jennifer A. Richeson1 Abstract Reminders of in-group wrongdoing can prompt defensive responses that affect intergroup relations. Across two studies, American participants were randomly assigned to have their American identity increased (or not), then read a passage describing the negative treatment of Native American Indians by perpetrators described as either early Americans (i.e., in-group members) or European settlers (i.e., out-group members). Memory for the content of the passage and feelings of collective guilt were assessed. Participants demonstrated poorer memory when the perpetrators were framed as in-group (Americans), rather than out-group (Europeans), members. Further, participants in the in-group perpetrator condition whose American identification was primed experienced less collective guilt compared with participants in the in-group perpetrator condition whose American identification was not primed. Implications for intergroup relations and the understanding of collective memory are discussed. Keywords social identity threat, memory, collective guilt How intergroup events are remembered can cause controversy to reminders of past transgressions is vital. The present work decades and even centuries after the events. The perceived
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Remembering and Forgetting : Two Sides of the Coin
    7 Remembering and Forgetting : Two sides of the coin 7.1 Introduction If I ask you to tell me the name of your favourite actor, actress or singer - it won’t take more than a second to comeout with the answer. In the same way we all remember our childhood friends, interesting incidents relating to them, our family members, relatives and so many other things. Have you ever wondered that how do we remember all these things, and do not forget them over the period. This is due to a dynamic and vast system in all of us whichis known as memory. The human memory has immense potential. You must be knowing that before the Vedas were scripted, the oral tradition existed which means that the immense wealth of Vedas were passed on from generation to generation by the oral tradition. This was totally de- pendent on our memory. In this lesson we will study more about this dynamic system which we call as memory. 7.2 Objectives After reading this lesson you will be able to: z explain memory; z differentiate between the stages of memory; z describe forgetting; z list some strategies for enhancing memory. 66 :: Psychology 7.3 Memory and Forgetting Psychologists consider memory and learning to be different processes, though, both are closely related. Whereas, learning refers to the acquisition of new behaviours through experience ,memory refers to the process of storing of information that can be retrieved when required. In this lesson you will learn about memory and forgetting. You can very easily understand the significance of memory by visualizing a situation about a person who has lost his memory.
    [Show full text]
  • The World of Psychology, Portable Edition
    THE WORLD OF PSYCHOLOGY, PORTABLE EDITION © 2007 Samuel E. Wood Ellen Green Wood Denise Boyd, Houston Community College System ISBN: 0-205-49009-3 Visit www.ablongman.com/replocator to contact your local Allyn & Bacon/Longman representative. The colors in this document are not an accurate representation of the final textbook colors. SAMPLE CHAPTER 6 The pages of this Sample Chapter may have slight variations in final published form. Allyn & Bacon 75 Arlington St., Suite 300 Boston, MA 02116 www.ablongman.com 5234_Wood_ch06_pp275-326 1/24/06 2:37 PM Page 275 5 6.1 Remembering The Atkinson-Shiffrin Model The Levels-of-Processing Model Three Kinds of Memory Tasks 5 6.2 The Nature of Remembering Memory as a Reconstruction Eyewitness Testimony Recovering Repressed Memories Unusual Memory Phenomena Memory and Culture 5 6.3 Factors Influencing Retrieval The Serial Position Effect Environmental Context and Memory The State-Dependent Memory Effect 5 6.4 Biology and Memory The Hippocampus and Hippocampal Region Neuronal Changes and Memory Hormones and Memory 5 6.5 Forgetting Ebbinghaus and the First Experimental Studies on Forgetting The Causes of Forgetting 5 6.6 Improving Memory 275 5234_Wood_ch06_pp275-326 1/24/06 2:38 PM Page 276 276 5 CHAPTER 6 How accurate is your memory? Franco Magnani was born in 1934 in Pontito, an ancient village in the hills of Tuscany, Italy. His father died when 5Franco was eight. Soon after that, Nazi troops occupied the village. The Magnani family lived through many years of hardship, at times facing starvation. With the help of the village priest, Franco fulfilled a lifelong dream when he emigrated to the United States in 1958 and settled in San Francisco.
    [Show full text]
  • Intentional Forgetting: Investigating Interpretations and Future Potentials of Cognitive Control
    Intentional Forgetting: Investigating Interpretations and Future Potentials of Cognitive Control Alysha Higgins School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Ireland [email protected] Abstract. Memory is a faculty that proves difficult to master. It is a natural hu- man process to forget, and it is often done so unintended. The concept of inten- tional forgetting focuses on the memories one does not wish to keep, namely those that are associated with trauma or may give rise to negative emotions such as anxiety, sadness, regret or anger. This paper investigates the current research on intentional forgetting, specifically the narrow interpretations of both intention and forgetting a memory, paired with the issues that arise due to the assumptions associated with these terms. In addition, mental context, mental representations and repression are discussed in order to decipher how this control over the memory process occurs. These actions are further discussed in terms of degree of intention, noting a difference between unconscious repression and intentional, control-driven alteration of memory. Intentional forgetting remains difficult to achieve. This paper aims to investigate and surface those difficulties, organising the missing pieces to promote a thorough understanding and improve future im- plementation. Keywords: Intentional forgetting, Directed forgetting, Executive control, Memory, Unwanted memory, Mental context, Repression 1 Introduction Intentional forgetting research argues for the possibility to obtain a greater control over one’s memory by purposely ridding unwanted memories that may cause negative emo- tion or thoughts. What if one could hold on to the good while leaving behind the bad? While a promising start to aiding in instances of trauma and anxiety, as well as associ- ated negative emotions such as anger, sadness and regret, the process of intentional forgetting is not as straightforward or adaptable to real life as the research may prove.
    [Show full text]
  • (PSY2B01) BASIC THEMES in PSYCHOLOGY- II Module 1Cognitive Processes 16 Hours Basic Units of Thought: Concepts; Forming Concepts
    (PSY2B01) BASIC THEMES IN PSYCHOLOGY- II Module 1Cognitive Processes 16 Hours Basic units of Thought: Concepts; forming concepts, Types of concepts, prototypes; Images; Language, the structure of Language, Role of language in thinking. Reasoning; Deductive and inductive thinking. Problem solving; Types of problems, steps and barriers to effective problem solving, approaches or strategies of problem solving-trial and error, heuristics, algorithm, forming sub goals, searching for analogies, changing the representation of the problem ;Culture, cognitive style and problem solving. Creative thinking; convergent and divergent thinking; stages of creative thought. Decisionmaking;Heuristics and judgment-availability heuristics, representativeness heuristics, anchoringheuristics. Module 2 Memory 18 Hours Key processes in memory: Encoding, Storage and Retrieval. Atkinson-Shiffrin Model; sensory memory, short term memory and long term memory; Levels of processing. STM; Iconic memory; Working memory, Alan Baddeley's components of working memory; Chunking; Rehearsal-maintenance rehearsal, rote rehearsal, elaborative rehearsal. LTM; Types of LTM-procedural memory, declarative memory-semantic memory, episodic memory; Flash-bulb memory, tip of the tongue phenomenon. Implicit and explicit memory-priming. Measuring memory; Recall, Recognition, Relearning. Retrieval cues; Encoding specificity principle; Context dependent memory, State dependent memory; Serial position effect; Reconstructive memory; Source Monitoring; Eyewitness testimony; False memory;Metamemory.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissociation, Memory and Trauma Narrative
    1 ANGELICA STANILOIU / HANS J. MARKOWITSCH 2 3 Dissociation, Memory and Trauma Narrative 4 5 6 Memory is not a unity, but is considered to be composed of several systems, which 7 differ both phylogenetically and ontogenetically. The episodic-autobiographical 8 memory is defined as the conjunction of subjective time, autonoetic consciousness 9 and the experiencing self. It is arguably uniquely human and regarded as the high- 10 est human ontogenetic achievement. The emergence of episodic-autobiographical 11 memory occurs in the context of securing a particular level of self awareness and is 12 supported and enriched by the acquirement of language abilities. On its turn, the 13 episodic-autobiographical memory facilitates further self-development and is 14 viewed – at least in highly individualized societies – as playing a key role in main- 15 taining a consistent feeling of identity and a coherent awareness of self‘s continuity 16 and sameness over time. The episodic-autobiographical memory is vulnerable to 17 both neurological and environmental insults (such as psychological trauma or 18 stress) and susceptible to re-shaping, distortions and misinformation. The distur- 19 bances of episodic-autobiographical memory that are triggered by psychic inci- 20 dents can be multifaceted with respect to both their clinical course and manifes- 21 tations, ranging from hypermnesia for traumatic events to a total memory retrieval 22 blockade (such as in dissociative or psychogenic amnesia). The degree to which 23 chronic repeated stress or severe acute psychological stress may afflict an individ- 24 ual’s homeostasis and precipitate one form or another of psychiatric or non-psy- 25 chiatric medical symptoms is modulated by a gamut of factors, such as genetic dis- 26 positions, type and duration of stress, developmental stage, age, gender, context, 27 prior experiences and personality features.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories of Forgetting 2
    Forgetting FORGETTING No single theory is able to explain all instances of forgetting Study Design Dot Point: Strengths and limitaons of psychological theories of forgeng: *Retrieval failure theory including 5p of the tongue phenomenon *Interference theory *Mo5vated forge9ng as informed by the work of Sigmund Freud including repression and suppression *Decay theory Forgetting • Definition: The loss of information or the inability to access previously encoded information within memory. Retrieval cue • Retrieval cue: “Any s2mulus that assists the process of locang and recovering informaon What are stored in memory” (Grivas some et al 2011) retrieval cues for you? Examples of retrieval cues Photos Who was the first person you Music/songs/sounds kissed? (you know, seriously) Places QUESTIONS Questions DRAWINGS Smells Objects MUSIC/SONGS PLACES Emotional and physical states People Even letters of the alphabet! PHOTO ALBUMS Retrieval cues... • Examples of retrieval cues include: • questions • emotional states such as happiness or depression • physical states such as being intoxicated or in pain A retrieval cue is like a hook that • environmental cues such as allows you to pull an sights, sounds and smells obscure memory within that specific situation from its hiding place Retrieval failure theory • According to this theory, we forget because we lack or are not able to use the correct cues to retrieve or access information stored in long-term memory. • Forgetting occurs when information is available in LTM but is not accessible. Memories stored in LTM are not actually I know you’re forgotten but are inaccessible in there because of an absent, somewhere! inappropriate or faulty cue.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 7A: Memory
    UNIT 7A: MEMORY THE PHENOMENON OF MEMORY ____PROCESSING_____. Some processing requires OBJECTIVE 1: Define memory, and explain how flashbulb effort at first but with ______PRACTICE______ and memories differ from other memories. ____EXPERIENCE_______ it becomes effortless. 1. Learning that persists over time indicates the existence of _____MEMORY___________ for that learning. Give examples of material that is typically encoded with 2. Memories for surprising, significant moments that are little or no effort. especially clear are called _____FLASHBULB______ AUTOMATIC PROCESSING INCLUDES THE ENCODING OF memories. Like other memories, these INFORMATION ABOUT SPACE, TIME, AND FREQUENCY. IT ALSO _______CAN____________ memories (can/cannot) err. INCLUDES THE ENCODING OF WORD MEANING, A TYPE OF ENCODING THAT APPEARS TO BE LEARNED. OBJECTIVE 2: Describe Atkinson-Shiffrin’s classic three- OBJECTIVE 4: Contrast effortful processing with automatic stage processing model of memory, and explain how the processing, and discuss the next-in-line effect, the spacing contemporary model of working memory differs. effect, and the serial position effect. 3. Both human memory and computer memory can be 2. Encoding that requires attention and effort is called viewed as _____INFORMATION_____- ___EFFORTFUL_____ ______PROCESSING_____. ___PROCESSING__________ systems that perform three 3. With novel information, conscious repetition, or tasks: _____ENCODING_______, ______REHEARSAL____, boosts memory. ______STORAGE________, and 4. A pioneering researcher in verbal memory was ___RETRIEVAL____________. ______EBBINGHAUS____. In one experiment, he found 4. The classic model of memory has been Atkinson and that the longer he studied a list of nonsense syllables, Shiffrin’s ________THREE________- the ____FEWER__________ (fewer/greater) the number ________STAGE_________ ______PROCESSING______ of repetitions he required to learn it later. model. According to this model, we first record 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Forgetting
    OUTLOOK THE BRAIN emories make us who we are. They shape our understanding of the world and help us to predict what’s Mcoming. For more than a century, research- SAM FALCONER ers have been working to understand how memories are formed and then fixed for recall in the days, weeks or even years that follow. But those scientists might have been looking at only half the picture. To understand how we remember, we must also understand how, and why, we forget. Until about ten years ago, most researchers thought that forgetting was a passive process in which memories, unused, decay over time like a photograph left in the sunlight. But then a handful of researchers who were investigating memory began to bump up against findings that seemed to contradict that decades-old assumption. They began to put forward the radical idea that the brain is built to forget. A growing body of work, cultivated in the past decade, suggests that the loss of memo- ries is not a passive process. Rather, forgetting seems to be an active mechanism that is con- stantly at work in the brain. In some — perhaps even all — animals, the brain’s standard state is not to remember, but to forget. And a bet- ter understanding of that state could lead to breakthroughs in treatments for conditions such as anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and even Alzheimer’s disease. “What is memory without forgetting?” asks Oliver Hardt, a cognitive psychologist studying the neurobiology of memory at McGill University in Montreal, Canada. “It’s impossible,” he says.
    [Show full text]
  • Murphynp AD As a Syndrome
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349942124 Alzheimer’s disease as a syndrome of overloaded amyloidic synaptic tagging in memory networks Preprint · March 2021 DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/7gsaz CITATIONS READS 0 294 1 author: Niall P Murphy University of Florida 89 PUBLICATIONS 2,720 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Psychobiology of pain View project Role of aggregating proteins in mnemonic physiology and pathology View project All content following this page was uploaded by Niall P Murphy on 10 March 2021. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Title: Alzheimer’s disease as a syndrome of overloaded amyloidic synaptic tagging in memory networks Author: Niall P. Murphy Affiliation: Independent researcher, U.K. Corresponding author: Niall P. Murphy Email: [email protected] Highlights: • A hypothetical model of the role of amyloid beta and tau phosphorylation in Alzheimer’s disease is presented • Aggregation of amyloid beta is proposed to write-protect plasticity underlying memory • Buildup of phospho-tau is proposed to form an image of established plasticity as insurance against plasticity-threatening insults • Alzheimer’s disease is postulated to be a syndrome caused by overloading of memory circuits resulting in aggregated amyloid beta reaching neurotoxic levels • Isodendritic neuromodulators such as norepinephrine and acetylcholine governing sleep and cognitive processing are postulated as controlling memory and delivering tau forms for imaging the potentiation state of synapses. Declarations of interest: none Important: This article is provided as a working hypothesis that has not been peer-reviewed.
    [Show full text]