Paper 1 Weber SP2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Paper 1 Weber SP2016 Nicole Weber Paper 1: Critical Theory February 25, 2016 THE “FORMATIVE” MODERN ENVIRONMENTAL BOOMERANG -new applications through the lens of Pollock and Warhol- "The problem of American painting, had been the problem of subject matter. Painting kept getting entangled in the contradictions of America itself. We made portraits of ourselves when we had no idea who we were. We tried to find God in landscapes we were destroying as fast as we could paint them. We painted Indians as fast as we could kill them. And during the greatest technological jump in history, we painted ourselves…. By the time we became Social Realists…when we finally abandon the hopeless constraint to create a national art, that we succeed for the first time, in doing just that; by resolving the problem…” - Painters Painting (1973) Considering for a moment that the ideas considered within the Modern and Post Modern Art eras are referred to as two moments measured in time, a pre and post measure, that captures the summative historical pivots that I have studied to date. Here I orient toward a more middle ground or formative position, where we return to components of both perspectives, a formative ideology derived during this learning process, to modify ideas that improve experience, one where I position myself and future work. The formative modern includes an “avant-garde culture of consciousness of history …to find a path along which it would be possible to keep culture moving in the midst of ideological confusion and violence” while strengthening our underdeveloped “universal literacy” as discussed by Greenburg (1936) within the Modern Art era. In addition, excepting that there are multiple ways of knowing and no universal truths while moving away from the dehumanized factory held outside ones influence as discussed within the Post Modern era. A formative modern focuses on the environmental crisis at hand, with brings us back to our community, to promote a sense of place and wonder that crosses the ‘great divide’ between popular culture and [their local natural] art (Staniszewski 1995). As a trained environmental biologist, focused on environmental issues and education, I have returned to art in order to expand dissemination and create a different type of language around environmental issues. So after over twenty years since my last art class, I lean into the art discourse, beginning to learn of work and methods that will guide my journey. So far, I have been part of two critical theory discussion groups, both within the graduate and undergraduate populations and taught by two culturally distinct faculty. Through this experience, I have a new understanding on how the instructor lens can influence the historical perspective shared, a valuable experience that provides an alternative lens and more critical thought given to historical narratives. Within both of these experiences, the discussion has focused on the power of the critical discourse within the art world, and how this influenced the work of Pollock and Warhol within the shift from Modern to Post Modern art. As art is a language that changes over time2 and from cultural perspective, within the shift of modern to post-modern art there was both a sense of loss and freedom. Modern artists shared a difficult historical context where materiality and textural richness appeared as characters on the surface challenging historical codes within the discourse (Sunanda 2016), and some go on to say that they communicated the absolute truths and acted as the martyrs of the restless unconscious for society (Steck 2016). Then within post-modernism the artist was more superficial, and was seen as an empty vessel within a dehumanized factory, but at the same time releasing the ideological point of view of nature as a spiritual place to nature as only a construct (Steck 2016). As one of the last Modern Abstract Expressionist considered, Pollock’s work celebrated the materiality of the work, where each layer of paint and oil performed as a distinct character within the performance of his massive ‘drip’3 or ‘semenal’2 paintings (Image 1), where his gestures veiled the personal within his work through his primal actions and impulses. Pollock challenged the boundaries of painting, where he Nicole Weber Paper 1: Critical Theory February 25, 2016 worked with sticks rather than brushes, household paints, challenged the vantage point of his work by placing the canvas on the floor of his studio, and preconceived an area for display by cutting the section out of the larger canvas. Pollock rhythmically gesturing to spatter the industrial paints onto canvas, working within his work physically, and felt part of the production and process. “My painting does not come from the easel. I prefer to tack the unstretched canvas to… the floor… On the floor I am more at ease. I feel nearer, more part of the painting, since this way I can walk around it, work from the four sides and literally be in the painting. When I am in my painting, I'm not aware of what I'm doing… the painting has a life of its own…there is pure harmony, an easy give and take, and the painting comes out well. —Jackson Pollock in Time 1956 (Wikipedia1 2016) 1. Jackson Pollock LOST POLITICS: ABSTRACT EXPRESSIONISM 9 Full Fathom Five, 1947 Nicole Weber Paper 1: Critical Theory February 25, 2016 As one of the early post-modern artists, Warhol famously asserted that to 'know' him, you simply needed to look at the ‘surface,’ and not read into himself or his work, as there was nothing more (Hopkins 2000). Here in this work, Marilyn Diptych, after her death he focused on the commercialization of an individual. Through twenty silkscreens of her, his layers resembled the shift in her image as she transitioned from Norma Jeane Mortenson (Image 2) to Marilyn Monroe (Image 3; Wikipedia2 2016; Steck 2016). In Marilyn Diptych he repeats the image, and reminds to viewer of her image within the media, and the contrast of color can suggest her mortality (Tate Museum 2016). 2. Norma Jeane Mortenson 3. Marilyn Monroe 4. Andy Warhol Marilyn Diptych, 1962 Nicole Weber Paper 1: Critical Theory February 25, 2016 The contrast of ideas and imagies has generated applications for my studio, around the role Pollock and Warholl played within society at the time and the work they produces. As we consider affects of climate change and societal roles, there is now a shift to move society closer to the more Modern awareness that an individual is rational and can act independently, however taking into consideration that there are barriers of access to information as seen in Post-Modernism. In addition, considering the Modern thought that scientific knowledge can connect us to the local effects, however remembering the local/indigenous viewpoint is also crucial in understanding these environmental shifts. As in post-modern thought, counter to religious teaching, there is no master plan and we have to except the a level of chaos within the system. Even for a moment, considering mortality for the human race. Generated from the classroom experiences, or ‘happenings’, I have created with an egg exploration with teachers, I work to bring the experience to a viewer with no facilitation or preformance [teaching] present [Image 5]. So in moving into bringing in the awareness and wonder to my viewer, here I would like to work with eggs to reimagine Andy Warhol's Marilyn Diptych, to capture the societal move from farm to factory. Here I have chosen watercolor as the medium, layering on or watering the images to reconsider the importance of water within the system. I would also like to include the viewer to have the option to see the white eggs from a confessional through a layer of red paint representing blood, to depict the sacrifice and contradiction of actions within the regions that produce chicken factories. Then from the farm egg side, show the movement of the Catholic Church to acknowledge the environmental concern. Then for Pollock’s primal method, I would like to remove the artist all together and use the natural movements of chickens on a canvas to capture a similar expression, reemphasizing the need to reconnect with earth’s messages. 5. Studio Implications Nicole Weber Paper 1: Critical Theory February 25, 2016 References: de Antonio, E. Painters Painting 1973. Documentary. Movie Hopkins, D. After Modern Art: 1945-2000. New York : Oxford University Press, 2000. Print Sanyal, S. Personal Communication. 2016 Staniszewski, M. A. Believing is Seeing: Creating a Culture of Art, New York, New York: Penguin Group, 1995. Print Steck, S. Personal Communication. 2016 Tate Museum. Marilyn Diptych. Web. February 2016 <http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/warhol- marilyn-diptych-t03093> Wikipedia1. Jackson Pollock. Web. February 2016 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_Pollock> Wikipedia2. Marilyn Monroe. Web. February 2016 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marilyn_Monroe> .
Recommended publications
  • Cast a Cold Eye: the Late Works of Andy Warhol
    G A G O S I A N G A L L E R Y October 11, 2006 PRESS RELEASE GAGOSIAN GALLERY GAGOSIAN GALLERY 555 WEST 24TH STREET 522 WEST 21ST STREET NEW YORK NY 10011 NEW YORK NY 10011 T. 212.741.1111 T. 212.741.1717 F. 212.741.9611 F. 212.741.0006 GALLERY HOURS: Tue – Sat 10:00am–6:00pm ANDY WARHOL: Cast a Cold Eye: The Late Works of Andy Warhol Wednesday, October 25 – Friday, December 22, 2006 Opening reception: Wednesday, October 25th, from 6 – 8pm “If you want to know about Andy Warhol, just look at the surface of my paintings and films and me, and there I am. There’s nothing behind it.” --Andy Warhol Gagosian Gallery is pleased to announce the exhibition "Cast a Cold Eye: The Late Work of Andy Warhol.” The extensive exhibition, which occupies all galleries at 555 West 24th Street as well as a new gallery at 522 West 21st Street, draws together many of Warhol’s most iconic paintings from the following series executed during the 70s and 80s: Mao, Ladies & Gentlemen, Hammer & Sickle, Skulls, Guns, Knives, Crosses, Reversals, Retrospectives, Shadows, Rorschach, Camouflage, Oxidation, The Last Supper, Self Portraits and more. Comprised of works from the last eighteen years of Warhol’s life, “Cast a Cold Eye…” includes masterpieces that have been rarely or never before seen in New York, as well as important loans from The Metropolitan Museum of Art, The Museum of Modern Art, New York, The Andy Warhol Museum, and private collections. In his later career, Warhol was often vilified by art critics for being little more than a society portraitist and social impresario.
    [Show full text]
  • Wavelength (November 1984)
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO Wavelength Midlo Center for New Orleans Studies 11-1984 Wavelength (November 1984) Connie Atkinson University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/wavelength Recommended Citation Wavelength (November 1984) 49 https://scholarworks.uno.edu/wavelength/49 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Midlo Center for New Orleans Studies at ScholarWorks@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wavelength by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I I ~N0 . 49 n N<MMBER · 1984 ...) ;.~ ·........ , 'I ~- . '· .... ,, . ----' . ~ ~'.J ··~... ..... 1be First Song • t "•·..· ofRock W, Roll • The Singer .: ~~-4 • The Songwriter The Band ,. · ... r tucp c .once,.ts PROUDLY PR·ESENTS ••••••••• • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••• • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••• • •• • • • • • • • ••• •• • • • • • •• •• • •• • • • •• ••• •• • • •• •••• ••• •• ••••••••••• •••••••••••• • • • •••• • ••••••••••••••• • • • • • ••• • •••••••••••••••• •••••• •••••••• •••••• •• ••••••••••••••• •••••••• •••• .• .••••••••••••••••••:·.···············•·····•••·• ·!'··············:·••• •••••••••••• • • • • • • • ...........• • ••••••••••••• .....•••••••••••••••·.········:· • ·.·········· .....·.·········· ..............••••••••••••••••·.·········· ............ '!.·······•.:..• ... :-=~=···· ····:·:·• • •• • •• • • • •• • • • • • •••••• • • • •• •
    [Show full text]
  • NO RAMBLING ON: the LISTLESS COWBOYS of HORSE Jon Davies
    WARHOL pages_BFI 25/06/2013 10:57 Page 108 If Andy Warhol’s queer cinema of the 1960s allowed for a flourishing of newly articulated sexual and gender possibilities, it also fostered a performative dichotomy: those who command the voice and those who do not. Many of his sound films stage a dynamic of stoicism and loquaciousness that produces a complex and compelling web of power and desire. The artist has summed the binary up succinctly: ‘Talk ers are doing something. Beaut ies are being something’ 1 and, as Viva explained about this tendency in reference to Warhol’s 1968 Lonesome Cowboys : ‘Men seem to have trouble doing these nonscript things. It’s a natural 5_ 10 2 for women and fags – they ramble on. But straight men can’t.’ The brilliant writer and progenitor of the Theatre of the Ridiculous Ronald Tavel’s first two films as scenarist for Warhol are paradigmatic in this regard: Screen Test #1 and Screen Test #2 (both 1965). In Screen Test #1 , the performer, Warhol’s then lover Philip Fagan, is completely closed off to Tavel’s attempts at spurring him to act out and to reveal himself. 3 According to Tavel, he was so up-tight. He just crawled into himself, and the more I asked him, the more up-tight he became and less was recorded on film, and, so, I got more personal about touchy things, which became the principle for me for the next six months. 4 When Tavel turned his self-described ‘sadism’ on a true cinematic superstar, however, in Screen Test #2 , the results were extraordinary.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Copper Icons Crosses Kunz Collection: Castings Faith
    Russian Copper Icons 1 Crosses r ^ .1 _ Kunz Collection: Castings Faith Richard Eighme Ahlborn and Vera Beaver-Bricken Espinola Editors SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Stnithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsoniar) Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Folklife Studies Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the worid of science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the worid. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where tfie manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2, Issue 2: Winter 2017
    Volume 2, Issue 2: Winter 2017 I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ICSC Press JOURNAL OF GENIUS AND EMINENCE Editor Mark A. Runco Distinguished Research Fellow, American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology Editorial Board Selcuk Acar James C. Kaufman International Center for Studies in Creativity, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut Buffalo State, State University of New York Arthur I. Miller Andrei Aleinikov University College, London, England International Academy of Genius, Monterey, California Robert Root-Bernstein Giovanni E. Corazza Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan University of Bologna, Marconi Institute for Creativity, Bologna, Italy Dean Keith Simonton University of California, Davis David Galenson Professor, University of Chicago Harriet Zuckerman Fellow, John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Senior Vice President, Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Academic Director of the Center for Creativity Economics, Professor Emerita, Columbia University. Universidad del CEMA I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ICSC Press Journal of Genius and Eminence (ISSN: 2334-1130 print, Permissions and submissions: Email [email protected] 2334-1149 electronic) is published semi-annually by ICSC Press, International Center for Studies in Creativity, Buffalo Copyright © 2017 by the International Center for Studies State, State University of New York, 1300 Elmwood Avenue, in Creativity. All rights reserved. No part of this publication Chase 248, Buffalo, NY 14222. ICSC Press Managing Editor: may be reproduced, stored, transmitted, or disseminated in Paul Reali, [email protected]. any form or by any means without prior written permission. ICSC Press grants authorization for individuals to photocopy Production, Advertising, and Subscription Office: ICSC copyright material for private research use on the sole basis Press, SUNY Buffalo State, 1300 Elmwood Avenue, Chase that requests for such use are referred directly to the requester’s 248, Buffalo, NY 14222.
    [Show full text]
  • ANDY WARHOL's LIFE and DEATH Miková, a Slowly Dying-Out Rusyn
    ENG ANDY WARHOL’S LIFE AND DEATH Miková, a slowly dying-out Rusyn village in Eastern Slovakia, is a birthplace of Andrej Warchola and Julia Zavacka. The man and the woman who gave life to the most characteristic personage of the world of art of the second half of the 20th century – Andy Warhol. Why do we mention Miková? As a matter of fact, we’re talking about a place which doesn’t stand out among other Rusyn or Slovak villages of the Prešov region of Slovakia, slowly dying out due to lack of workplaces. The original old Greek Catholic church there is a silent witness to the events and the history of Miková. Julia Warchola went to America with her husband after their wedding in the Greek Catholic church in Miková in 1909. Her trip to America led through Poland, towards the Baltic sea; she covered most of the trip with her best friend on foot, and then, from Gdansk, by ship, to New York. They settled down in Pittsburgh, in the city of miners and industry. They were driven away by poverty, only to find the same, poverty, in the foreign land. Hard work of the father weakened his health so much that he died (1942). Sickly little Andy spent whole days in the company of his mother. His older brothers, John and Paul had to go to work to fill their father’s role so that the family could survive. John recalled: ‘We were very poor. Mum made extra money cleaning, at home, at night she sewed and made various souvenirs that she sold afterwards.
    [Show full text]
  • [PDF] Andy Warhol
    ^$ ;::,-:>^^5 Andy .J35 1942 1949 1956 1963 1970 |S77 1111 ^ Artists in Their Time Andy Warhol Linda Bolton Franklin Watts A Division of Sclnolastic Inc. New York Toronto London Aucl<lancl Sydney IVIexico City New Delini Hong Kong Donbury, Connecticut First published in 2002 by Franklin Watts 96 Leonard Street London EC2A 4XD First American edition published in 2002 by Franklin Watts A Division of Scholastic Inc. 90 Sherman Turnpike Danbury.CT 06816 Series Editor: Adrian Cole Series Designer: Mo Choy Art Director: Jonathan Hair Picture Researcher: Julie McMahon A CIP catalog record for this title is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN 0-531-12225-5 (Lib. Bdg.) ISBN0-531-16618-X(Pbk.) Printed in Hong Kong, China © Franklin Watts 2002 Acknowledgements AKG London: 15 © The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc./ARS, NY and DAGS, London 2002 & © 2002 Ronald Feldman Fine Arts, NY; 19 © The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc./ARS, NY and DACS, London 2002; 29 © The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc./ARS, NY and DAGS, London 2002; 42. Archives of The Andy Warhol Museum, Pittsburgh: 6; 7t; 9t; 22b; 32, 39 © The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc./ARS, NY and DAGS, London 2002; 4Ib Paul Rocheleau. Artothek: 14 © The Estate of Roy Lichtenstein/DAGS 2002. BFl GoUections: 35 © The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc./ARS, NY and DAGS, London 2002. Gourtesy of Gollection Stephanie Seymour Brant, The Brant Foundation, Greenwich, GT: 11 © The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc./ARS, NY and DAGS, London 2002; 31 © The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc./ARS, NY and DAGS, London 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAIN BRIDGE a HISTORY of the BRIDGE and ITS SURROUNDING TERRITORY 1608 -1991 by Jim Pearson
    CHAIN BRIDGE A HISTORY OF THE BRIDGE AND ITS SURROUNDING TERRITORY 1608 -1991 By Jim Pearson Most modern day Arlington commuters who use Chain Bridge in their daily trek to and from the District would be astonished to learn how prominent the area at Pimmit Run at the Virginia end of the bridge was in the early days of our fledgling country. At the mouth of the Pimmit was an early river crossing; two Indian trails from the interior country met at this spot and it is believed there was an Indian settlement and fishing ground here. 1 This spot, the first break in the palisades below Little Falls supported among other endeavors: Indian gatherings, taverns, ferries, a tobacco warehouse, the first industrial park in Northern Virginia, an extensive stone quarry operation, a Civil War outpost in the defense of the City, a sleepy crossroads settlement that came alive each spring during the herring and shad runs, and finally a high volume traffic artery to the City. It is also the site of a proposed town that failed to materialize. The area on the Virginia side of the river at Chain Bridge is rich in history, its past now noted only by a small roadside historical marker. The area was explored as early as 1608 "as high as the Falls" by Captain John Smith. An Indian settlement was believed to be at Pimmit Run with two trails that correspond approximately to the Fairfax Road (Route 123) and the other following Pimmit Run turning south and joining what is the present day Glebe Road at Walker Chapel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moon Gateway to the Solar System
    THE MOON GATEWAY TO THE SOLAR SYSTEM G. Jeffrey Taylor, PhD WHEN ASTRONAUTS dug into the Moon’s surface during the Apollo program, they were doing more than digging up dry, dark sediment. They were time travelers. The rocks and sediment returned by Apollo contain vital clues to how Earth and the Moon formed, the nature and timing of early melting, the intensity of impact bombardment and its variation with time, and even the history of the Sun. Most of this information, crucial parts of the story of planet Earth, cannot be learned by studying rocks on Earth because our planet is so geologi-cally active that it has erased much of the record. The clues have been lost in billions of years of mountain building, volcanism, weath-ering, and erosion. Colliding tectonic plates The Moon, front and back The top right photograph is a telescopic image of the Earth-facing half of the Moon obtained at Lick Observatory in California. The one below right was taken during the Apollo 16 mission and shows mostly the farside, except for the dark areas on the left, which can be seen, though barely, from Earth. The two major types of terrain are clearly visible. The highlands, which are especially well displayed in the photograph of the farside, are light-colored and heavily cratered. The maria are darker and smoother; they formed when lava flows filled depressions. One of the mysteries about the Moon is why fewer maria occur on the farside than nearside. Note how many craters stand shoulder to shoulder on the farside.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercialised History: Popular History Magazines in Europe
    Hannig Hannig (eds.) / Susanne Popp / Jutta Schumann / Miriam Hannig Susanne Popp / Jutta Schumann / Miriam Hannig (eds.) (eds.) Commercialised History: Popular History Magazines in Europe Schumann / This volume of essays is the result of the in which results based on qualitative Commercialised History: EU project ‘EHISTO’, which dealt with the and quantitative methods are presented, mediation of history in popular history related to the content focus areas profiled Popp magazines and explored how history in in the national magazines. Popular History Magazines the commercialised mass media can be used in history teaching in order to de- velop the media literacy and the transcul- in Europe tural competences of young people. The The Editors volume offers articles which for the first Susanne Popp is professor of History time address the phenomenon of popular Didactics at the University of Augsburg history magazines in Europe and their (Germany) and chairwoman of the mediating strategies in a foundational International Society for History way. The articles are intended as intro- Didactics. Together with Jutta Schumann, ductory material for teachers and student who works as a research associate at teachers. The topic also offers an innova- the University of Augsburg, and Miriam tive approach in terms of making possible Hannig, she managed the EU project a European cross-country comparison, EHISTO (2012-2014). History Magazines in Europe History Magazines Commercialised History: Popular Popular History: Commercialised ISBN 978-3-631-65779-9
    [Show full text]
  • Andy Warhol's Exploding Plastic Inevitable
    Jean Wainwright Mediated Pain: Andy Warhol’s Exploding Plastic Inevitable ‘Warhol has indeed put together a total environment. But it is an assemblage that actually vibrates with menace, cynicism and perversion. To experience it is to be brutalized, helpless…The Flowers of Evil are in full bloom with the Exploding, Plastic, Inevitable’.1 The ‘Exploding Plastic Inevitable’ (EPI) was Andy Warhol’s only foray into a total inter-media experience.2 From 1966 to 1967 the EPI, at its most developed, included up to three film projectors3, sometimes with colour reels projected over black and white, variable speed strobes, movable spots with coloured gels, hand-held pistol lights, mirror balls, slide projectors with patterned images and, at its heart, a deafening live performance by The Velvet Underground.4 Gerard Malanga’s dancing – with whips, luminous coloured tape and accompanied by Mary Woronov or Ingrid Superstar – completed the assault on the senses. [Fig.9.1] This essay argues that these multisensory stimuli were an arena for Warhol to mediate an otherwise internalised interest in pain, using his associates and the public as baffles to insulate himself from it. His management of the EPI allowed Warhol to witness both real and simulated pain, in a variety of forms. These ranged from the often extreme reactions of the viewing audience to the repetition on his background reels, projected over the foreground action.5 Warhol had adopted passivity as a self-fashioning device.6 This was a coping mechanism against being hurt, and a buffer to shield his emotional self from the public gaze.7 At the same time it became an effective manipulative device, deployed upon his Factory staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning to Look – Week 4 Media and Techniques – Works on Paper
    Learning to Look – Week 4 Media and Techniques – Works on Paper An ORIGINAL PRINT is a work of art which an artist creates by processing a surface of wood, metal, paper, stone or screen so that more than one identical image can be printed from it. Ink is transferred from this prepared surface [often called “the plate”] onto paper (or another material) and becomes the original print, distinct and individual in its form as a work of art. An original print should never be confused with a reproduction, which is a copy of an original artwork, mass­produced by means of an automatic copier, photochemical, or digital process. In contrast, an original print is hand­inked or hand­pulled on a press by the artists themselves or by a skilled printer working under the supervision of the artist. The originally conceived design and composition become inseparable from the process itself. Edition – An edition is the total number of original prints (impressions) made from a plate; In the 20 th century, it became customary for artists to number all the impressions in the edition. Edition numbers often look like fractions: the number on top is the specific impression number; the number on the bottom is the total number of impressions in the edition. The quality of the print bears no relation to the edition number. In addition to the number, each print usually has the artist’s signature and the title of the print, usually in pencil. There are four major types of fine art prints. Each uses a different method for fixing the image to the plate prior to transferring the image to the support.
    [Show full text]