DOCSLIB.ORG

Civil Aviation Authority (Uganda) Aeronautical Charges Schedule Effective January 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Civil Aviation Authority (Uganda) Aeronautical Charges Schedule Effective January 2012 CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY (UGANDA) AERONAUTICAL CHARGES SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 2012 Summary of Charges (according to the AIP Uganda): 1. Landing Charge:– up to 54 ton = US$ 5 per ton; over 54 ton - 154 ton = US$ 6 per ton; over 154 ton = US$ 5 per ton (for aircraft paying annually or monthly, a series of landings made within one hour in the course of training shall be charged as one landing at the standard rate); 2. Parking Charge:- The first 6 hours are free; After six hours and within a period of 24 hours, or part thereof, up to 9 ton = US$ 5 per day; over 9ton – 27 ton = US$ 8 per day; over 27ton-70ton = US$ 12 per day; over 70ton - 115ton = US$20 per day; over 115ton-165ton=US$ 30 per day; over 165ton-270ton=US$ 40 per day; Over 270ton =US$ 100 per day; 3. ASC(International)=Passenger Service charge + Security Charge:-US$40 + US$10 = US$ 50 ASC (Domestic) =Passenger Service Charge + Security Charge:-UGShs 3000 + UGShs 2000 = UGShs 5000 4. Lighting charge:- 50% of the single day landing charge for landings and takeoffs between 1600 UTC and 0400 UTC 5. Aerobridge Charge: The first 3 hours is US$ 60; thereafter, US$ 60 per hour or part thereof 6. Navigation Charge:- Up to 2 ton = US$ 10 per flight; over 2ton-4ton = US$ 20 per flight; over 4ton - 10ton = US$ 25 per flight; over 10ton - 20ton = US$ 40 per flight; over 20ton -95ton = US$ 125 per flight; over 95ton - 150ton = US$ 200 per flight; over 150ton - 273ton = USD 280 per flight; over273ton = US$ 330 per flight 7. AIP Charge: US$ 100; AIP Amendment Service Charge: US$30 per copy 8. Departure Passenger Handling System Usage: US$ 60 per boarding pass References: 1. Jane’s All the World’s Aircraft 2006/7 2. Aeronautical Charge Sheet 2000 3. Aircraft Type Designators, ICAO Doc 8643/39 4. Eurocontrol Aircraft performance Database, available at: http://contentzone.eurocontrol.int/aircraftperformance/details.aspx?ICAO=A10&GroupFilter=12&NameFilter=&ICAO Filter= Issued by …………………………………………… Director Air Navigation Services Date: ……………………………………………. Approved By ………………………………………………………. Director Safety, Security and Economic Regulation Date: ………………………………………………………. AIRCRAFT NAME ICAO CODE WEIGHT (TONNES) LANDING NAVIGATION PARKING LIGHTING A-10 Thunderbolt 2 A10 22.70 114 125 8 57 Agusta A109 2.8 14 20 5 7 An-124 Ruslan A124 405.00 2,025 330 100 1,013 An-124 (Weight B) A124 395 1,975 330 100 988 A-300-600 A306 170.00 850 280 40 425 A-300 A30B 165.00 825 280 30 413 A-310 A310 150.00 900 200 30 450 A-318 A318 59.00 354 125 12 177 A-319 A319 64.00 384 125 12 192 A-320 A320 73.90 443 125 20 222 A-321 A321 89.00 534 125 20 267 A-330-200 A332 230.00 1,150 280 40 575 A-330-300 A333 230.00 1,150 280 40 575 A-330-300 (BRUSSELS) A333 215 1,075 280 40 538 A-340-200 A342 275.00 1,375 330 100 688 A-340-300 A343 275.00 1,375 330 100 688 A-340-500 A345 372.00 1,860 330 100 930 A-340-600 A346 368.00 1,840 330 100 920 Airbus A350XWB A359 268.00 1,340 280 40 670 A-380-800 A388 560.00 2,800 330 100 1,400 A-300ST Beluga A3ST 155.00 775 280 30 388 Skyhawk A4 11.14 56 40 8 28 A-6,EA-6,KA-6 Intruder,Prowler A6 28.00 140 125 12 70 748 A748 21.09 105 125 8 53 112 Commander AC11 1.48 7 10 5 4 500 Commander AC50 3.06 15 20 5 8 560 Commander AC56 3.06 15 20 5 8 680F Commander AC68 3.86 19 20 5 10 680FL Grand Commander AC6L 4.65 23 25 5 12 695 Jetprop Commander 980/1000 AC95 5.08 25 25 5 13 600,601 (AEROSTAR) AEST 2.86 14 20 5 7 Alpha Jet AJET 7.00 35 25 5 18 ALENIA AMX AMXM 13.00 65 40 8 33 An-12 AN12 63.00 378 125 12 189 AICSA An-2 AN2 5.50 28 25 5 14 An-22 Antheus AN22 250.00 1,250 280 40 625 An-225 AN225 640 3,200 330 100 1,600 An-24 AN24 21.00 105 125 8 53 An-26 AN26 24.00 120 125 8 60 An-28 AN28 6.50 33 25 5 16 AIRCRAFT NAME ICAO CODE WEIGHT (TONNES) LANDING NAVIGATION PARKING LIGHTING An-30 AN30 21.80 109 125 8 55 An-32,Firekiller (Sutlej) AN32 27.00 135 125 8 68 An-38 AN38 8.80 44 25 5 22 An-70 AN70 130.00 780 200 30 390 An-72/74 AN72 34.50 173 125 12 86 An-8 AN-8 24 120 125 8 60 AS-355 Twinstar AS55 2.25 11 20 5 6 1125 Astra (C-38) ASTR 11.18 56 40 8 28 ALENIA ATR-42-300/320 AT43 16.70 84 40 8 42 ALENIA ATR-72 AT72 24.00 120 125 8 60 1150 Atlantic ATLA 43.50 218 125 12 109 ATP ATP 22.93 115 125 8 57 B-1 Lancer B1 216.37 1,082 280 40 541 Bolkow, Casa, Eurocopter, mbb B105 2 10 10 5 5 1900 (C-12J) B190 7.69 38 25 5 19 B-2 Spirit B2 170.55 853 280 40 426 B300 Super King Air 350 B350 6.80 34 25 5 17 BAe-146-100 B461 23.29 116 125 8 58 BAe-146-200 B462 42.20 211 125 12 106 BAe-146-300 B463 46.00 230 125 12 115 B-52 Stratofortress B52 221.35 1,107 280 40 553 707-100 B701 86.18 517 125 20 259 707-300 B703 150.80 905 280 30 452 717-200 B712 54.89 329 125 12 165 Boeing 720 B720 93 558 125 20 279 727-200 B722 95.30 572 200 20 286 B727 B727 86 516 125 20 258 737-100 B731 49.95 250 125 12 125 737-200 B732 52.39 262 125 12 131 737-300 B733 56.47 339 125 12 169 737-400 B734 65.00 390 125 12 195 737-500 B735 65.00 390 125 12 195 737-600 B736 56.24 337 125 12 169 737-700 B737 70.00 420 125 12 210 737-800 B738 70.53 423 125 20 212 737-900 B739 79.02 474 125 20 237 747-100 B741 333.40 1,667 330 100 834 747-200 B742 374.85 1,874 330 100 937 747-300 B743 374.85 1,874 330 100 937 747-400 (EMIRATES) B744 396.89 1,984 330 100 992 AIRCRAFT NAME ICAO CODE WEIGHT (TONNES) LANDING NAVIGATION PARKING LIGHTING 747-400 B744 395 1,975 330 100 988 Boeing 747-8 B748 442.25 2,211 330 100 1,106 747SR B74R 340.19 1,701 330 100 850 747SP B74S 317.52 1,588 330 100 794 757-200 B752 115.68 694 200 30 347 757-300 B753 123.60 742 200 30 371 767-200ER B762 179.17 896 280 40 448 767-300ER B763 186.88 934 280 40 467 767-400 B764 204.12 1,021 280 40 510 777-200 B772 229.00 1,145 280 40 573 777-200 (EMIRATES) B772 247 1,235 280 40 618 777-300 B773 299.37 1,497 330 100 748 787-8 B788 228.00 1,140 280 40 570 BAC 1-11 BA11 45.20 226 125 12 113 Bulldog BDOG 1.07 5 10 5 3 100 King Air BE10 5.35 27 25 5 13 Navigator BE18 3 15 20 5 8 1300 Commuter BE20 5.67 28 25 5 14 23 Musketeer,Sundowner BE23 1.09 5 10 5 3 33 Debonair,Bonanza (E-24) BE33 1.39 7 10 5 3 36 Bonanza (piston) BE36 1.65 8 10 5 4 400 Beechjet BE40 7.30 37 25 5 18 50 Twin Bonanza BE50 2.86 14 20 5 7 55 Baron BE55 2.30 12 20 5 6 58 Baron BE58 2.50 13 20 5 6 60 Duke BE60 3.07 15 20 5 8 65 Queen Air BE65 3.70 19 20 5 9 70 Queen Air BE70 3.70 19 20 5 9 76 Duchess BE76 1.77 9 10 5 4 80 Queen Air BE80 3.99 20 20 5 10 99 Airliner BE99 7.60 38 25 5 19 90 King Air BE9L 4.58 23 25 5 11 A-4 Albatross BER4 86.00 516 125 20 258 Islander BN2B 3 15 20 5 8 BN-2T Turbine Islander, Turbine Defender BN2T 3.18 16 20 5 8 206 (turbine) C06T 1.63 8 10 5 4 C12 C12 3 15 5 20 7.5 C100 C100 71 426 125 20 213 AC-130 Spectre C130 70.31 422 125 20 211 AIRCRAFT NAME ICAO CODE WEIGHT (TONNES) LANDING NAVIGATION PARKING LIGHTING C-135 Stratolifter C135 146.29 878 200 30 439 C-141 Starlifter C141 155.58 778 280 30 389 150,A150,Commuter,Aerobat C150 0.68 3 10 5 2 152,A152,Aerobat C152 0.76 4 10 5 2 C-160 C160 51.00 255 125 12 128 C-17 Globemaster 3 C17 265.35 1,327 280 40 663 C170 CESSNA C170 2 10 10 5 5 172 Skyhawk C172 1.05 5 10 5 3 177,Cardinal C177 1.07 5 10 5 3 C17A C17A 279 1,395 330 100 698 182,Skylane C182 1.27 6 10 5 3 Skywagon C185 2 10 10 5 5 C-2 Greyhound C2 24.69 123 125 8 62 206 (CESSNA) C206 1.65 8 10 5 4 207 (Turbo)Skywagon 207 C207 1.72 9 10 5 4 208 Caravan 1,(Super) Cargomaster C208 3.63 18 20 5 9 C21 C21 13 65 40 8 33 210 Centurion C210 1.82 9 10 5 5 Aviocar C212 7.70 39 25 5 19 525A Citation CJ2 C25A 5.61 28 25 5 14 AVIONES COLOMBIA T303 C303 2.34 12 20 5 6 C-130J Hercules C30J 70.30 422 125 20 211 310,T310 (U-3,L-27) C310 2.49 12 20 5 6 337,M337,MC337,T337B/C/D/E/F/H C337 2.10 11 20 5 5 340 (CESSNA) C340 2.71 14 20 5 7 401,402,Utililiner,Businessliner C402 2.86 14 20 5 7 404 Titan C404 3.83 19 20 5 10 414,Chancellor C414 3.06 15 20 5 8 421,Executive Commuter C421 3.10 16 20 5 8 425 Corsair,Conquest 1 C425 3.90 20 20 5 10 441 Conquest,Conquest 2 C441 4.47 22 25 5 11 C-5 Galaxy (L-500) C5 348.82 1,744 330 100 872 500 Citation,Citation 1 C500 4.92 25 25 5 12 501 Citation 1SP C501 4.92 25 25 5 12 525 CitationJet, Citation CJ1 C525 4.72 24 25 5 12 550 Citation 2 C550 6.85 34 25 5 17 560 Citation 5 Ultra Encore C560 7.21 36 25 5 18 560XL Citation Excel C56X 8.71 44 25 5 22 650 Citation 3/6/7 C650 14.06 70 40 8 35 Citation Sovereign C680 13.74 69 40 8 34 AIRCRAFT NAME ICAO CODE WEIGHT (TONNES) LANDING NAVIGATION PARKING LIGHTING 750 Citation 10 C750 16.19 81 40 8 40 AVIONES COLOMBIA R182 C82R 1.34 7 10 5 3 CANADAIR CL-415 SuperScooper CL2T 19.89 99 40 8 50 Challenger 300 CL30 17.4 87 40 8 44 CL-44 Forty Four CL44D 96 576 200 20 288 Canadair Challenger CL60 19.55 98 40 8 49 CL-600 Challenger 604 CL604 21 105 125 8 53 Challenger 605 CL65 20 100 40 8 50 AIRTECH CN-235 MP Persuader CN35 15.10 76 40 8 38 Concorde CONC 185.10 926 280 40 463 CAP-230/231/232 CP23 0.76 4 10 5 2 CANADAIR RJ-100 Regional Jet CRJ1 21.50 108 125 8 54 CANADAIR RJ-200 Regional Jet CRJ2 21.52 108 125 8 54 CANADAIR RJ-700 Regional Jet CRJ7 33.00 165 125 12 83 CANADAIR RJ-900 Regional Jet CRJ9 36.51 183 125 12 91 228 (DORNIER) D228 6.40 32 25 5 16 328 (DORNIER) D328 13.99 70 40 8 35 SuperStar/Magnum DA50 1.20 6 10 5 3 DC-10 DC10 263.00 1,315 280 40 658 C-47 Skytrain DC3 13 65 40 8 33 DC-54 Skymaster DC4 30 150 125 12 75 DC-6 DC6 44 220 125 12 110 DC-7 Seven Seas DC7 57 342 125 12 171 DC-8-50 DC85 147.40 884 200 30 442 DC-8-60 DC86 160.00 800 280 30 400 DC-8-70 DC87 162.03 810 280 30 405 DC-9-30 DC93 49.94 250 125 12 125 DC-9-50 DC95 (DC9) 54.93 330 125 12 165 CC-142 DH8A 15.65 78 40 8 39 Dash 8 Q300 DH8C 18.64 93 40 8 47 Dash 8 Q400 DH8D 29.00
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coproduce Or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Brazilian Political Science Review, Vol
    Brazilian Political Science Review ISSN: 1981-3821 Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política Svartman, Eduardo Munhoz; Teixeira, Anderson Matos Coproduce or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 12, no. 1, e0005, 2018 Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201800010005 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=394357143004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Coproduce or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Eduardo Munhoz Svartman Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Anderson Matos Teixeira Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil The creation of the Union of South American Nations (USAN) aroused expectations about joint development and production of military aircraft in South America. However, political divergences, technological asymmetries and budgetary problems made projects canceled. Faced with the impasse, this article approaches features of two military aircraft development experiences and their links with the regionalization processes to extract elements that help to account for the problems faced by USAN. The processes of adoption of the F-104 and the Tornado in the 1950s and 1970s by countries that later joined the European Union are analyzed in a comparative perspective. The two projects are compared about the political and diplomatic implications (mutual trust, military capabilities and regionalization) and the economic implications (scale of production, value chains and industrial parks).
    [Show full text]
  • Fly-By-Wire - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 11-8-20 下午5:33 Fly-By-Wire from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Fly-by-wire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 11-8-20 下午5:33 Fly-by-wire From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Fly-by-wire (FBW) is a system that replaces the Fly-by-wire conventional manual flight controls of an aircraft with an electronic interface. The movements of flight controls are converted to electronic signals transmitted by wires (hence the fly-by-wire term), and flight control computers determine how to move the actuators at each control surface to provide the ordered response. The fly-by-wire system also allows automatic signals sent by the aircraft's computers to perform functions without the pilot's input, as in systems that automatically help stabilize the aircraft.[1] Contents Green colored flight control wiring of a test aircraft 1 Development 1.1 Basic operation 1.1.1 Command 1.1.2 Automatic Stability Systems 1.2 Safety and redundancy 1.3 Weight saving 1.4 History 2 Analog systems 3 Digital systems 3.1 Applications 3.2 Legislation 3.3 Redundancy 3.4 Airbus/Boeing 4 Engine digital control 5 Further developments 5.1 Fly-by-optics 5.2 Power-by-wire 5.3 Fly-by-wireless 5.4 Intelligent Flight Control System 6 See also 7 References 8 External links Development http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly-by-wire Page 1 of 9 Fly-by-wire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 11-8-20 下午5:33 Mechanical and hydro-mechanical flight control systems are relatively heavy and require careful routing of flight control cables through the aircraft by systems of pulleys, cranks, tension cables and hydraulic pipes.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study BAE Systems Eurofighter Typhoon
    Executive Summary Eurofighter Typhoon is the world’s most advanced swing-role combat aircraft. A highly agile aircraft, it is capable of ground-attack as well as air defence. With 620 aircraft on order, it is also the largest and most complex European military aviation project currently running. A collaboration between Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK, it is designed to meet air force requirements well into the 21st Century. Advanced electronics and state of the art onboard computers are critical to the Typhoon’s high performance and agility. These systems need to be safe, reliable and easily maintained over the estimated 25 year lifecycle of the aircraft. The Ada programming language was therefore the natural choice for Typhoon’s onboard computers. It provides a high-integrity, high-quality development environment with a well defined structure that is designed to produce highly reliable and maintainable real-time software. Typhoon is currently the largest European Ada project with over 500 developers working in the language. Tranche 1 of the project saw 1.5 million lines of code being created. BAE Systems is a key member of the Eurofighter consortium, responsible for a number of areas including the aircraft’s cockpit. As part of latest phase of the project (named “Tranche 2”) it needed a solution for host Ada compilation in the development of software for the Typhoon’s mission computers, as well as for desktop testing. BAE Systems selected GNAT Pro from AdaCore in 2002 for this mission-critical and safety-critical area of the project. AdaCore has been closely involved with the Ada language since its inception and was able to provide a combination of multi-language technology and world-leading support to BAE Systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Hippag™ Compressor Systems
    Precision Control Systems HiPPAG™ compressor systems 300 Series - infrared detector cooling Features Ultra Electronics Precision Control Systems Benefits Operating pressure up equips the world’s military with a range of Reduces aircrew workload with a to 414 bar (6,000 psi) integrated High Pressure Pure Air continuous supply of cooling gas Flow rates up to 20 Generators (HiPPAG™) for the supply of throughout the entire mission, regardless SL/min (Sea Level/STP) high-pressure pure air to cool infrared of duration detectors used in missile seekers and Minimises logistics footprint by eliminating Gas purity <2ppm CO2 thermal imagers. rechargeable gas bottle and their and <1ppm H2O HiPPAG™ has been installed on-board associated support equipment military air, sea and land borne platforms for Ensures maximum seeker performance over 25 years as a direct replacement for through consistent delivery of very high rechargeable gas bottles. purity air With over 6,500 systems supplied worldwide, Combat proven technology with over three million flying hours of reliable operation HiPPAG™ has demonstrated outstanding performance and reliability in-service on key Modular construction can be re-configured US Navy and NATO platforms. to suit particular installation requirements Precision Control Systems HiPPAG™ - high performance compressor and filtration systems Ultra offers HiPPAG™ systems as either ‘military -off-the-shelf’ or custom designed solutions to meet platform specific requirements. Ultra has over 25 years of experience in working with customers to offer the best value fully compliant and low risk solution to the most demanding of applications. The HiPPAG™ 345 is able to support multiple IR seekers from a single unit, reducing overall system cost and complexity.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Right Choices
    Summer/Fall 2008 Making the right choices MTU Aero Engines Holding AG Dachauer Straße 665 80995 Munich • Germany Technology + Science Products + Services Interview + Report Tel. +49 89 1489-0 Fax +49 89 1489-5500 www.mtu.de Optimized bestseller Thrust for Saudi “Eurofighter – the German Air Arabia Force’s system of the future” Contents Editorial Cover Story Dear Readers: Making the right choices 4 - 7 The German International Aerospace Exhibi- the A320 family has for MTU, you can imag- tion, today’s Berlin ILA, was first staged 99 ine the significance the new engine will have, Technology + Science years ago. That puts it on the threshold of a being supposed to find takers in both Airbus new century. Aviation, too, is standing on the and Boeing. Optimized bestseller 8 - 11 Making the right choices threshold of a new era: In view of impending Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) has selected it as the sole engine choice for the climate change, aircraft need to be quieter, The geared turbofan concept carries great The fine art of patching 12 - 13 Mitsubishi Regional Jet (MRJ), and also Bombardier will equip its CSeries with it: fuel-thriftier and cleaner, and their engines significance also technologically: our Claire Pratt & Whitney’s geared turbofan (GTF™) is gaining momentum and is obviously along with them. For years we engine makers (Clean Air Engine) technology program re- MTU Global here to stay. have been working on novel green technolo- volves around it. In three steps, we hope by Page 4 gies and now have found a suitable solution 2035 to reduce CO emissions by 30 percent A new brand is born 14 - 15 2 in the geared turbofan™ engine.
    [Show full text]
  • Striker Ii: Bring on the Night Special Rusi Report
    PROGRAMME NEWS & FEATURES EUROFIGHTER JULY 2015 STRIKER II: BRING ON THE NIGHT SPECIAL RUSI REPORT: THE FUTURE IS TYPHOON THE ULTIMATE TEST DRIVE BALTIC GUARDIANS SPANISH AIR FORCE ON PATROL 2015 • EUROFIGHTER WORLD EDITORIAL 2015 • EUROFIGHTER WORLD 3 WELCOME 03 Editorial 04 Striker II: Bring on the Night arlier this year I was privileged to travel An incredibly sophisticated digital innovation, Striker II is BAE Systems’ to Ämari Air Base in Estonia where I latest Helmet Mounted Display system (HMD). Ewitnessed at first hand the work of the Spanish Air Force as they provided 24/7 10 Typhoon shines amid Thunder and Lightning NATO Baltic Air Policing. Twentyfive aeronautical engineering undergraduates clung to every word The Spanish were following the German and that came from the mouth of Group Captain Laurie Hilditch in the Italian Air Forces and they have since been impromptu classroom. replaced by the British - all deploying Eurofighter Typhoons. 12 Advantage Eurofighter The crews had been operating in severe con - Title: Baltic Air Policing with the Luigi Trotta: The Life Cycle Advantage. ditions with temperatures down to -20°C. Spanish Air Force Despite that, the alert response time required 16 THE FUTURE IS TYPHOON: RUSI Report by NATO is now just 15 minutes – whatever the weather Photo: Cristian Schrik The Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) recently released its report: L throws at them. “Maximising European Combat Air Power”. Joining me on the trip were a number of Spanish aviation journalists who were incredibly impressed, not just with 20 Baltic Guardians the warm reception we were given, but with the dedication Spanish Eurofighters take a Tour of Duty in Estonia.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Full-Year Results Data Appendix
    2014 Full-Year Results Data Appendix © 2015 Rolls-Royce plc The information in this document is the property of Rolls-Royce plc and may not be copied or communicated to a third party, or used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied without the express written consent of Rolls-Royce plc. This information is given in good faith based upon the latest information available to Rolls-Royce plc, no warranty or representation is given concerning such information, which must not be taken as establishing any contractual or other commitment binding upon Rolls-Royce plc or any of its subsidiary or associated companies. All figures on an underlying basis unless otherwise stated. Please see note 2 of the Financial Review for definition. Trusted to deliver excellence Table of contents 2 Section Page The Group 3 Financials 13 Civil aerospace 21 Defence aerospace 28 Power Systems 33 Marine 36 Nuclear & Energy 41 Nuclear 43 3 The Group Roadmap: Our transformation 4 2011-2013 2014-2017 2018-2020 Began focus on 4Cs Transforming our Delivering the benefits business; growing our installed base Customer Rising Civil Large Engine Growing installed base, deliveries cash & margins Concentration Restructuring/ 20% footprint reduction Cost underutilisation Technology investment Cash Land & Sea cost & integration focus Land & Sea growth Trusted to deliver excellence Group results 2014 full-year (including divested Energy) 5 Group revenue £14.6 billion Order book £73.7 billion Civil 10% 11% Defence 48% OE 47% Power Systems 71.6 73.7 52%
    [Show full text]
  • Military Aircraft Markings Update Number 126, November 2015
    Military Aircraft Markings Update Number 126, November 2015 Serial Type (other identity) [code] Owner/operator, location or fate A4850 RAF SE5a <R> (BAPC 176) Bygone Times Antique Warehouse, Eccleston, Lancs N3200 VS300 Spitfire IA (G-CFGJ) [QV] Privately owned, Duxford R4118 Hawker Hurricane I (G-HUPW) [UP-W] Privately owned, Old Warden W9385 DH87B Hornet Moth (G-ADND) [YG-L,3] Privately owned, Oaksey Park AW101 AgustaWestland AW101 Mk.510 (G-17-510) AgustaWestland, Yeovil EM726 DH82A Tiger Moth II (G-ANDE) [FY] Privately owned, White Waltham GZ100 AgustaWestland AW109SP Grand New (G-ZIOO) AgustaWestland, for RAF LZ844 VS349 Spitfire F VC [UP-X] Currently not known TX310 DH89A Dragon Rapide 6 (G-AIDL) Privately owned, Duxford TZ164 Isaacs Spitfire (G-ISAC) [01-A] Privately owned, Hampstead Norreys, Berks VN799 EE Canberra T4 (WJ874/G-CDSX) Cornwall Aviation Heritage Centre, Newquay WJ721 EE Canberra TT18 [21] <ff> Morayvia, Kinloss WJ945 Vickers Varsity T1 (G-BEDV) [21] Cornwall Aviation Heritage Centre, Newquay WP964 DHC1 Chipmunk T20 (G-HDAE) Privately owned, Wellesbourne Mountford WR971 Avro 696 Shackleton MR3 (8119M) [Q] (fuselage) Fenland & W Norfolk Aviation Museum, Wisbech WT722 Hawker Hunter T8C (G-BWGN) [878/VL] Cornwall Aviation Heritage Centre, Newquay WV798 Hawker Sea Hawk FGA6 [026/CU] Privately owned, Newquay XK895 DH104 Sea Devon C20 (G-SDEV) [19/CU] Cornwall Aviation Heritage Centre, Newquay XN341 Saro Skeeter AOP12 (8022M) Sold to The Netherlands, 2015 XN458 Hunting Jet Provost T3 (8234M/XN594) [19] Privately owned,
    [Show full text]
  • R&S®M3AR MR6000A Software Defined Radio
    R&S®M3AR MR6000A Software Defined Radio VHF/UHF transceiver for ATC and secure airborne communications – safety meets security. The software defined, multiband-capable airborne transceiver R&S®MR6000A is a member of the R&S®M3AR product family. Its excellent characteristics make it suitable for applications in military and civil environments including all types of airborne platforms such as helicopters, transport aircraft, jets and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). Product Flyer | 01.01 Secure Communications MR6000A_Fly_en_3607-0900-32_v0101.indd 1 08.02.2016 18:59:26 Accommodated in a housing that complies with the R&S®M3AR ARINC 600 standard (3MCU), the R&S®MR6000A provides interfaces for connecting external devices such as an automatic direction finder (ADF), a LINK 11 data terminal MR6000A set (DTS), an improved data modem (IDM) or an external encryption device, e.g. the R&S®MMC3000. The transceiv- er can be operated continuously with full transmit power At a glance even at ambient temperatures of up to +71 °C. The transceiver supports various standards such as ED-23B, ICAO Annex 10, STANAG 4204 and STANAG 4205 The R&S®MR6000A covers the frequency range from for fixed frequency/ATC operation, STANAG 4246 for 30 MHz to 400 MHz and supports the NATO frequency HAVE QUICK and STANAG 4372 for SATURN EPM/ hopping methods (TRANSEC) HAVE QUICK and SATURN. ECCM communications as well as STANAG 5511 and Integrated NATO encryption (COMSEC) is available as an MIL-STD-188-203-1A for LINK 11 operation. option to protect voice and data transmissions against eavesdropping. The transceiver is interoperable with the To ensure that safety requirements for the complete air- NATO KY-58 and KY-100 encryption devices as well as the craft are met, the transceiver has been developed in accor- ELCRODAT 4-2 from Rohde & Schwarz.
    [Show full text]
  • Composite Chronicles: a Study of the Lessons Learned in the Development, Production, and Service of Composite Structures
    NASA Contractor Report 4620 Composite Chronicles: A Study of the Lessons Learned in the Development, Production, and Service of Composite Structures Louis F. Vosteen Analytical Services & Materials, Inc. • Hampton, Virginia Richard N. Hadcock RNH Associates • Huntington, New York National Aeronautics and Space Administration Prepared for Langley Research Center Langley Research Center • Hampton, Virginia 23681-0001 under Contract NAS1-19317 November 1994 This publication is available from the following sources: NASA Center for AeroSpace Information National Technical Information Service (NTIS) 800 Elkridge Landing Road 5285 Port Royal Road Linthicum Heights, MD 21090-2934 Springfield, VA 22161-2171 (301) 621-0390 (703) 487-4650 TABLE OF CONTEN_I'S Section Title Page Section Title Page Introduction Quality Control 23 General 23 Organizational Issues 2 Nondestructive Inspection 23 Organizational Barriers 2 Effects of Defects 23 Organizational Needs 2 Lessons Learned 23 Technology Transfer 3 Lessons Learned 4 Supportability 24 General 24 Structural Design, Analysis, and Test 5 In-Service Damage & Repair 24 Design and Certification Requirements 5 Lessons Learned 25 Structural Design 7 Structural Analysis 11 Conclusions and Recommendations 25 Structural Test 11 Cost Considerations in Design 12 Appendix 27 Design R&D Needs 13 Lessons Learned 14 Military Aircraft 27 Commercial Transport Aircraft 35 Materials & Processes 15 General Aviation 40 Materials 15 Remotely Piloted Research Vehicles and Processes 16 Drones 43 Joints and Attachments 17 Helicopter Applications 44 Lessons Learned 17 Observations and Conclusions 48 Manufacturing and Tooling 18 References 51 Manufacturing 18 Tooling 20 Acknowledgments 54 Lessons Learned 22 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Number Title Page 1. Organization of structures Design Build Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Accident Prevention September 2000
    FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION Accident Prevention Vol. 57 No. 9 For Everyone Concerned With the Safety of Flight September 2000 See-and-avoid Deficiencies Cited in Collision of Fighter and Light Airplane The report said that the pilot of a Cessna 152 probably was taking aerial photographs and the pilot in the front seat of a Panavia Tornado was head-down, conducting operational checks, when the aircraft collided in good weather over relatively flat terrain. FSF Editorial Staff At 1132 local time Jan. 21, 1999, a Cessna 152 and degraded the potential of other traffic to locate and a U.K. Royal Air Force (RAF) Panavia Tornado avoid him; collided 655 feet above ground level (AGL) near Mattersey, Nottinghamshire, England. The Cessna • “When conducting operational checks, head- pilot and passenger, and the Tornado student pilot down, while at low level, the front-seat pilot [the and instructor pilot were killed. The collision student pilot] of the Tornado did not detect the occurred in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) Cessna. The rear-seat pilot [the instructor pilot] in uncontrolled airspace. had a limited field of view ahead of his aircraft and would have been unable to detect other The U.K. Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) aircraft in the forward sector; said, in its final report, that the following causal factors were identified during the accident • “The principle of ‘see and avoid’ was suspended investigation: during a period in which none of the pilots was able to conduct an effective lookout; [and,] • “None of the pilots
    [Show full text]
  • Aeronautical Engineering
    Aeronautical NASA SP-7037(123) Engineering June 1980 A Continuing N/\SA Bibliography with Indexes National Aeronautics and Space Administration CASE FILE (;OPY Aeronautical Engineering Ae ering Aeronautical E igineering Aeronautical Engir mi Engineering Aeronautical I nautical Engineering AeruFai Aeronautical Engineering Aeu ?ring Aeronautical Engineerin gineering Aerorautical Engin aronautil Engineering,. cal E i Engineering Aeronai mtautical Engineering Aen ring Aeronautical Engineerim ACCESSION NUMBER RANGES Accession numbers cited in this Supplement fall within the following ranges. STAR (N-10000 Series) N80-17981 - N80-20022 !AA (A-I0000 Series) A80-24721 A80-28952 This bibliography was prepared by the NASA Scientific and Technical Information Facility operated for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration by PRC Data Services Corn pa ny NASA SP-7031(123) AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING A Continuing Bibliography Supplement 123 A selection of annotated references to unclas- sified reports and journal articles that were introduced into the NASA scientific and tech- nical information system and announced in May 1980 in • Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports (STAR) • International Aerospace Abstracts (/AA). Scientific and Technical Information Branch 1980 NfGA National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC INTRODUCTION Under the terms of an interagency agreement with the Federal Aviation Administration this publication has been prepared by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for the joint use of both
    [Show full text]