DOCSLIB.ORG

Species Composition: Methodological Comparison and Advancement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Species Composition: Methodological Comparison and Advancement National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Acadia Acadia National Park Revisiting MacArthur’s Classic Study of Niche Partitioning of Spruce Wood Warblers Bik D. R. Wheeler, Acadia National Park, Bar Harbor, ME and College of the Atlantic, Bar Harbor, ME Fig. 5. Depicted is one of Introduction: Distribution: 17 forest structure plots. Each of the four species were The outer circle represents In 1956 and 1957, Robert H. the 20m diameter observed in all quadrats of the boundary. Each tree over MacArthur studied the ecology of five 3m tall was identified, species of the genus Setophaga plot at some time during the measured and mapped. field seasons. Additionally, Each tree is represented as (wood warbler), resulting in a circle where size is each species was seen with proportional to the diameter contributions to the theory of niche at breast height. Fill color partitioning. MacArthur asserted that each other species in the represents species: white is red spruce, green is balsam the five Setophaga are sympatric same tree, at least once during fir, yellow is American larch, the observation period. pink is paper birch, and species that evolved to occupy blue is mountain ash. Large However, there were spatial diameter trees are evenly separate behavioral niches. His spread while small observations were conducted in differences in density of diameter trees have patchy territorial males during the distribution and red spruce Acadia National Park, Maine, USA. are evenly distributed, while In the breeding seasons of 2014 and mapping surveys (Fig.2). other species are patchy. Fig. 2. The study boundaries are shown along with the 50 2015, I repeated MacArthur’s study meter square quadrats labeled with ID numbers. The Forest Structure Assessment: darker blue represents quadrats where singing males in the same location, to reassess were encountered more frequently during surveys and MacArthur (1957) described the plot at Bass warbler niche partitioning and white quadrats represent quadrats where there were zero encounters with the species. Harbor Head as a mature stand of white observe possible changes over time. spruce (Picea glauca) approximately 60-70 Fig. 4. Foraging heights and feet in height. The area today is predominantly substrate measurements. Species Composition: shorter red spruce (Picea rubens). To evaluate The yellow circles represent heights and substrate type availability of size and species of trees in the (in this case branch tips) where a female black- plot, I established 20m diameter plots in which 1956: Cape May warbler throated green warbler trees over 3m were measured and mapped to 2014‐15: Northern parula foraged on June 29, 2014. 2014‐15: Magnolia warbler 1956: Bay‐breasted warbler establish total heights, canopy heights, stem 1956: Blackburnian warbler density, and size class spacing. 1956 and 2014‐15: Myrtle warbler Acknowledgments: Height from lowest portion I would like to thank my advisors and mentors: Dr. John Anderson, Bruce of canopy to top Connery, Ken Cline, Esq., Drs. Abe Miller-Rushing, Nishanta Rajakaruna, Sarah Hall and also the tireless efforts of Anne Hurley, Meaghan Lyon, Bekka Paine, Kristin Dillon, Abby Seymour, Anne Wheeler, Jesse Wheeler, Chris Heilakka, 1956 and 2014‐15: Black‐ and Natasha Krell and Acadia National Park Resource Management Program for throated green warbler Fig 3. This template was used in the original study to illustrate zones of logistical support. This project has been made possible through generous Fig. 1. The newly accepted phylogenic reconstruction for the family foraging. MacArthur (1958) asserted that financial support from the National Park Service, College of the Atlantic, the Parulidae (original figure from Lovette et al., 2010). The relative each warbler preferred a different zone. Height from ground to Garden Club of America, and the Maine Space Grant Consortium. relationships of the study species of both the 1950s study and the The simplification of foraging substrate lowest portion of canopy. current study. Two species of the genus are still present breeders, and stratum habitats are rudimentary but Literature cited: three are no longer present and two additional species are present. are necessary for new methodology to Lovette, I. J., J. L. Pérez-Emán, J. P. Sullivan, R. C. Banks, I. Fiorentino, S. be comparative. Córdoba Córdoba, M. Echeverry-Galvis, F. K. Barker, K. J. Burns, J. Klicka, S. M. Lanyon, E. Bermingham. 2010. A Comprehensive Multilocus Phylogeny For F THE O AT Methodological Comparison and Advancement: The Wood-Warblers And A Revised Classification Of The Parulidae (Aves). E L G A E N Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 57: 753–770. L T The methodology was designed to allow a direct comparison with L I O C C the original study, while utilizing current technology and allowing MacArthur, R.H (1957). Population ecology of some warblers of Northeastern coniferous forests. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. flexibility in the analysis. My analysis will involve a direct MacArthur, R.H. (1958). Population ecology of some warblers of Northeastern M C I X M L X application of my data to MacArthur’s tree template (Fig. 3) and coniferous forests. Ecology 39:599–619. will also allow me to apply alternative templates (Fig. 4). .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Edna Assay Development
    Environmental DNA assays available for species detection via qPCR analysis at the U.S.D.A Forest Service National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation (NGC). Asterisks indicate the assay was designed at the NGC. This list was last updated in June 2021 and is subject to change. Please contact [email protected] with questions. Family Species Common name Ready for use? Mustelidae Martes americana, Martes caurina American and Pacific marten* Y Castoridae Castor canadensis American beaver Y Ranidae Lithobates catesbeianus American bullfrog Y Cinclidae Cinclus mexicanus American dipper* N Anguillidae Anguilla rostrata American eel Y Soricidae Sorex palustris American water shrew* N Salmonidae Oncorhynchus clarkii ssp Any cutthroat trout* N Petromyzontidae Lampetra spp. Any Lampetra* Y Salmonidae Salmonidae Any salmonid* Y Cottidae Cottidae Any sculpin* Y Salmonidae Thymallus arcticus Arctic grayling* Y Cyrenidae Corbicula fluminea Asian clam* N Salmonidae Salmo salar Atlantic Salmon Y Lymnaeidae Radix auricularia Big-eared radix* N Cyprinidae Mylopharyngodon piceus Black carp N Ictaluridae Ameiurus melas Black Bullhead* N Catostomidae Cycleptus elongatus Blue Sucker* N Cichlidae Oreochromis aureus Blue tilapia* N Catostomidae Catostomus discobolus Bluehead sucker* N Catostomidae Catostomus virescens Bluehead sucker* Y Felidae Lynx rufus Bobcat* Y Hylidae Pseudocris maculata Boreal chorus frog N Hydrocharitaceae Egeria densa Brazilian elodea N Salmonidae Salvelinus fontinalis Brook trout* Y Colubridae Boiga irregularis Brown tree snake*
    [Show full text]
  • EASTERN SPRUCE an American Wood
    pÍ4 .4 . 1j%4 Mk ,m q ' ' 5 -w +*' 1iiL' r4i41. a')' q I Figure 1.-Range of white spruce (Picea glauca). 506612 2 EASTERN SPRUCE an American wood M.D. Ostrander' DISTRIBUTION monly found in cold, poorly-drained bogs throughout its range, and under such conditions forms dense slow- (Moench) Three spruces-white (Picea glauca growing pure stands. Through most of its range black Voss) , black (Picea , mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.) and red spruce occurs at elevations between 500 and 2,500 Picea rubens collectively known east- ( Sarg.)-are as feet, although substantial stands occur at lower eleva- em spruce. The natural range of white spruce ex- tions in eastern Canada. In the Canadian Rockies and tends from Newfoundland and Labrador west across Alaska it grows up the slopes to the limits of tree Canada to northwestern Alaska and southward growth. It usually is found in pure stands and in mix- through northern New England, New York, Mich- tures with other lowland softwoods, aspen, and birch. igan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota (fig. In western i ) . The natural range of red spruce extends from the mountains in Canada it is found east of coastal Nova Scotia and New Brunswick in Canada, southward British Columbia. Outlying stands also occur in the through New England and eastern New York. It con- Black Hills of South Dakota and in Montana and tinues southward at high elevations in the Appala. Wyoming. White spruce grows under a variety of chian Mountains to western North Carolina and east- climatic conditions, ranging from the wet insular cli- em Tennessee (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Pattern of Picea Rubens Prior to Canopy Recruitment
    pr7 7 AL Plant Ecology 140: 245-253, 1999. 245 rim © 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Growth pattern of Picea rubens prior to canopy recruitment Xinyuan Wu l , J. Frank McCormick2 Richard T. Busing3 1 Department of Rangeland Ecology and Management Texas AM University, College Station, TX 77843, USA; 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN 37996, USA; 3Forestry Sciences Laboratory 3200 SW Jefferson Way Corvallis, OR 97331, USA Received 22 July 1997; accepted in revised form 6 October 1998 Key words: Canopy disturbance regime, Great Smoky Mountains, Radial growth, Red spruce, Suppression and release Abstract A majority (72%) of Picea rubens Sarg. (red spruce) trees in an old-growth spruce-fir forest in the Great Smoky Mountains underwent episodes of radial growth suppression and release before they reached the forest canopy. Prior to canopy recruitment, trees experienced an average of 1.43 and a maximum of 7 suppression periods with an average ring width of 0.257 mm. Duration of suppression periods ranged from 4 to 79 years with an average of 19.05 years, which was significantly shorter than the average duration of release periods (29.00 years). Mean ring width in a suppression period was negatively correlated with duration of the suppression period. The opposite was true for release periods. The severity of suppression had no significant effect on mean ring width in subsequent release periods. Greater suppression was observed in the recent growth pattern of current non-canopy trees than in the historical growth pattern reconstructed from current canopy trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Picea Rubens Sarg. Family: Pinaceae Red Spruce
    Picea rubens Sarg. Family: Pinaceae Red Spruce The genus Picea is composed of about 30 species native to North America [12] and Eurasia [20]. The word picea comes from the ancient Latin name (pix, picis = pitch) of a pitchy pine, probably Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). The word rubens means reddish, referring to the reddish brown cones. Other Common Names: Abetina rossa, Adirondack spruce, black spruce, blue spruce, Canadese rode spar, Canadian red spruce, Canadian spruce, double spruce, eastern spruce, epicea rouge du Canada, he balsam, he- balsam, Hudson-fichte, kanadensisk rod-gran, North American red spruce, picea roja de Canada, picea rossa del Canada, red spruce, rot-fichte, sapinette rouge du Canada, spruce pine, spruces d'america, West Virginia spruce, yellow spruce. Distribution: Red spruce is native to Cape Breton Islands, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, west to Maine, southern Quebec and southeastern Ontario and south to central New York, northeastern Pennsylvania, northern New Jersey and Massachusetts. It also grows in the Appalachian Mountains of extreme western Maryland, eastern West Virginia, northern and western Virginia, western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee. The Tree: Red spruce can reach heights of 110 feet, with diameters of 4.5 feet. At the northern limit of its range, red spruce reaches heights of only 80 feet and diameters of 2 feet. General Wood Characteristics: The wood dries easily and is stable after drying, is moderately light in weight and easily worked, has moderate shrinkage, and is moderately strong, stiff, tough, and hard. It is not very resistant to bending or end-wise compression.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Restoration Success CASRI Partnership VIRTUAL Conference 2020
    Measuring Restoration Success CASRI Partnership VIRTUAL Conference 2020 November 4 – 5, 2020 CASRI's 2020 "Measuring Restoration Success" conference will focus on quantitative and qualitative measures of success for restoration of the red spruce-northern hardwood ecosystem in Central Appalachia. Decades of boots-on-the-ground restoration actions and associated research and monitoring has resulted in quantifiable success stories and lessons learned, all of which provide important knowledge to inform future actions and approaches. This conference gathers managers, practitioners, scientists, and leaders in the field to discuss the latest research findings, problem-solve common management challenges, and network to advance new and emerging partnerships. Strong partnerships will enable the network to continue to advance landscape resilience and connectivity of red spruce forests across the region. SCHEDULE Wednesday November 4, 2020 --- ZOOM link Day 1 Time Topic Speaker 9:00 – 9:10 Welcome and housekeeping Katy Barlow 9:10 – 9:50 Keynote Presentation: Are We Hitting the Mark Jamie Schuler for Red Spruce Restoration? Session 1: History of CASRI 10:00 – 10:15 The Blister Swamp Conservation and Alton Byers Restoration Project Twenty Years Later 10:15 – 10:30 Red spruce in West Virginia: Early Reports James Rentch from A. D. Hopkins and the W.Va. Agricultural Experiment Station 10:30 – 10:45 Session 1 Discussion Panel Session 2: Soils and Vegetation 11:00 – 11:10 Informed Red Spruce Restoration and James Leonard Conservation Planning using Soil
    [Show full text]
  • Germination and Early Survival of Picea Rubens Sargent in Experimental Laboratory and Field Plantings
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 3-1965 Germination and Early Survival of Picea rubens Sargent in Experimental Laboratory and Field Plantings Nancy C. Wilson University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Wilson, Nancy C., "Germination and Early Survival of Picea rubens Sargent in Experimental Laboratory and Field Plantings. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1965. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3256 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Nancy C. Wilson entitled "Germination and Early Survival of Picea rubens Sargent in Experimental Laboratory and Field Plantings." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Education. W. W. Wyatt, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: H. R. DeSelem, Fred Norris Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) March 1, 1965 To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Nancy c.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report
    U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Project Report Revised Edition – October 2003 Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U. S. Department of the Interior, U. S. Geological Survey. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Sara Lubinski and Kevin Hop U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center and Susan Gawler Maine Natural Areas Program This report produced by U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center 2630 Fanta Reed Road La Crosse, Wisconsin 54603 and Maine Natural Areas Program Department of Conservation 159 Hospital Street 93 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333-0093 In conjunction with Mike Story (NPS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) NPS, Natural Resources Information Division, Inventory and Monitoring Program Karl Brown (USGS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) USGS, Center for Biological Informatics and Revised Edition - October 2003 USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park Contacts U.S. Department of Interior United States Geological Survey - Biological Resources Division Website: http://www.usgs.gov U.S. Geological Survey Center for Biological Informatics P.O. Box 25046 Building 810, Room 8000, MS-302 Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225-0046 Website: http://biology.usgs.gov/cbi Karl Brown USGS Program Coordinator - USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4240 E-mail: [email protected] Susan Stitt USGS Remote Sensing and Geospatial Technologies Specialist USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4234 E-mail: [email protected] Kevin Hop Principal Investigator U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Vegetation Monitoring in Acadia National Park
    Forest Vegetation Monitoring in Acadia National Park J.D. Eckhoff Post-Doctoral Research Associate G.B. Wiersma Professor of Forest Resources 200~ Department of Forest Ecosystem Science University of Maine Orono, Maine 04469 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was supported by a grant from the US Environmental Protection Agency with additional funding provided by the University of Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station. A special thanks to the staff at Acadia National Park for their help and support of this research project. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION............... ........................... .................................... 1 METHODS ....................................................................................... 2 Research Site ........................................................................... 2 Plot Layout. .. 3 Plot Design .............................................................................. 3 Measurements Recorded..... .. .. .. .. 3 Foliar Analysis .......................................................................... 4 Statistical Analysis ...................................................................... 5 RESULTS ......................................................................................... 6 Cadillac Brook Watershed ............................................................ 6 Hadlock Brook Watershed...... .. .. .. 7 Foliar Chemical Analyses ............................................................ 9 DISSCUSSION .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Age and Stand Structure of Old-Growth Oak in Florida High Pine
    AGE AND STAND STRUCTURE OF OLD-GROWTH OAK IN FLORIDA HIGH PINE Cathryn H. Greenberg u.s. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Bent Creek Research and Demonstration Forest, 1577 Brevard Road, Asheville, NC 28806 Robert W. Simons 1122 SW 11th Avenue, Gainesville, FL 32601 ABSTRACT We sampled stand and age structure of 4 high pine sites composed of old-growth sand post oak (Quercus margaretta) and turkey oak (Quercus laevis), and young longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), in north and central peninsular Florida. The oldest turkey oak sampled was 123 years old, and the oldest sand post oak was 230 years old. Turkey oak exhibited the greatest variation in diameter at breast height relative to age. The median age of rotten and/or hollow trees was 63 years for turkey oak and 105 years for sand post oak. Age reconstruction indicates that in 1900 minimum oak tree density ranged from 10-60 trees per hectare among sites. This study demonstrates that sandhill oak trees were historically an integral component of at least some phases of the high pine ecosystem. These data support the hypothesis that spatial patchiness and variability in fire frequency, season, and intensity historically permitted oaks to reach and maintain tree size in varying densities over time and across the high pine landscape. Citation: Greenberg, C.H., and R.W. Simons. 2000. Age and stand structure of old-growth oak in Florida high pine. Page 30 in W. Keith Moser and Cynthia R Moser (eds.). Fire and forest ecology: innovative silviculture and vegetation management. Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference Proceedings, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Vegetation of West Virginia Upland Red Spruce
    Wild Vegetation of West Virginia Revised 1 December 2015 Comments and Questions? Contact [email protected] Upland Red Spruce Forests and Woodlands Early explorers and lumbermen found vast acreages of virgin red spruce forests in the Allegheny Mountains that are now part of West Virginia. During the late 1800s and early 1900s these forests were decimated by logging and fire, but today they are expanding again into parts of their previous niche. Upland red spruce forests are emblematic of West Virginia’s high Allegheny Mountains and are home to a unique assemblage of wild, native plants and animals. Ecological Description: These are upland, mixed evergreen-deciduous forests and woodlands dominated or codominated by red spruce (Picea rubens). Soils are usually cold, rocky, highly acidic, and often have deep organic horizons at the surface. Associated trees include eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis), red maple (Acer rubrum), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), mountain ash (Sorbus americana), and black cherry (Prunus serotina). Common shrubs include mountain holly (Ilex montana), great laurel (Rhododendron maximum), striped maple (Acer pensylvanicum), highbush cranberry (Vaccinium erythrocarpum), and mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia). The herb layer is characterized by species adapted to short, cool growing seasons, including intermediate woodfern (Dryopteris intermedia), mountain woodfern (Dryopteris campyloptera), mountain wood sorrel (Oxalis montana), Canada mayflower (Maianthemum canadense), and painted wakerobin (Trillium undulatum). Mosses and liverworts often have heavy cover over the rocky ground. Subterranean fungi called truffles grow in the deep organic soils. Animals that need these habitats: Spruce Knob Threetooth (snail), Atlantis Fritillary (butterfly), Green Comma (butterfly), Bicolored Moth, Cheat Mountain Salamander, Northern Goshawk, Pine Siskin, Swainson’s Thrush, Olive-sided Flycatcher, Red Crossbill, Snowshoe Hare, West Virginia Northern Flying Squirrel.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Spruce (Picea Rubens Sarg.) Cold Hardiness and Freezing Injury Susceptibility "
    Chapter 18 .... Red Spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) Cold Hardiness and Freezing Injury Susceptibility " : 1 2 1 Donald H. DeHayes >Paul G. Schaberg , and G. Richard Strirnbeck 1School ofNatural Resources, Universtty of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA; 1USDA Forest Service, Nort/leastem Research Station, P.O. Box 968, Burlington, VT 05402, USA Key words: red spruce, freezing injury, cold hardiness, sugars, water relations, dehardening, acid deposition, membrane-associated calcium 1. INTRODUCTION To survive subfreezing winter temperatmes, perennial plant species have evolved tissue-specific mechanisms to undergo changes in freezing tolerance that parallel seasonal variations in climate. As such,. most northern temperate tree species, including conifers, are adapted to the habitat and climatic conditions within their natural ranges and suffer little or no freezing injill·y under normally occurring environmental conditions. In fact, the maximum depth of cold hardiness in most well-adapted tree species is substantially greater than minimum temperatures encountered naturally, and cold hardening and oebardening are typically coordinated" with environmental conditions so that pl.ants are not injured by early or late season frosts or subfreezing temperatures that follow temporary winter thaws. Indeed, most examples of freezing or 'winter injury' in northern temperate woody plants involve species or provenances that are planted off-site. Furthermore, most cases of freezing injury are associated with improper timing or an :insufficient rate of cold acclimation during autumn, resulting in injury at temperatures that a species could probably withstand at a more advanced stage of cold hardiness (Srnithberg and Weiser 1968; Cannell 1985). 495 FJ. Bigras and S.J. Colombo (eds.), Conifer Cold Hardiness, 495-529.
    [Show full text]
  • Plethodon Nettingi) After 32 Years Whitney A
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 1-1-2012 Revisiting the Ecological Status of the Cheat Mountain Salamander (Plethodon nettingi) After 32 Years Whitney A. Kroschel [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, and the Forest Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Kroschel, Whitney A., "Revisiting the Ecological Status of the Cheat Mountain Salamander (Plethodon nettingi) After 32 Years" (2012). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 335. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REVISITING THE ECOLOGICAL STATUS OF THE CHEAT MOUNTAIN SALAMANDER (PLETHODON NETTINGI) AFTER 32 YEARS A thesis submitted to the Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Biological Sciences By Whitney A. Kroschel Approved by Dr. Thomas K. Pauley Dr. William B. Sutton Dr. Frank S. Gilliam Dr. Dan Evans Marshall University Huntington, West Virginia August, 2012 i Copyright by Whitney A. Kroschel 2012 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to first thank my advisor, Dr. Pauley, for giving me a chance and an opportunity to develop myself further as a student, a researcher, and a person. I grew by leaps and bounds during my two years at Marshall University, and am very grateful for the experiences I had and the friendships I gained within that time. I would like to thank the other members of my committee, Dr.
    [Show full text]