DOCSLIB.ORG

Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Project Report Revised Edition – October 2003 Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U. S. Department of the Interior, U. S. Geological Survey. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Sara Lubinski and Kevin Hop U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center and Susan Gawler Maine Natural Areas Program This report produced by U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center 2630 Fanta Reed Road La Crosse, Wisconsin 54603 and Maine Natural Areas Program Department of Conservation 159 Hospital Street 93 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333-0093 In conjunction with Mike Story (NPS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) NPS, Natural Resources Information Division, Inventory and Monitoring Program Karl Brown (USGS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) USGS, Center for Biological Informatics and Revised Edition - October 2003 USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park Contacts U.S. Department of Interior United States Geological Survey - Biological Resources Division Website: http://www.usgs.gov U.S. Geological Survey Center for Biological Informatics P.O. Box 25046 Building 810, Room 8000, MS-302 Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225-0046 Website: http://biology.usgs.gov/cbi Karl Brown USGS Program Coordinator - USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4240 E-mail: [email protected] Susan Stitt USGS Remote Sensing and Geospatial Technologies Specialist USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4234 E-mail: [email protected] Kevin Hop Principal Investigator U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center 2630 Fanta Reed Road La Crosse, Wisconsin 54603 Phone: (608) 783-6451 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.umesc.er.usgs.gov iii USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park U. S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Website: http://www.nps.gov Mike Story NPS Program Coordinator - USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program National Park Service Natural Resources Information Division 12795 West Alameda Parkway Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Phone: (303) 969-2746 E-mail: [email protected] Acadia National Park PO Box 177 Route 233, McFarland Hill Bar Harbor, Maine 04609 Phone: (207) 288-5463 Website: http://www.nps.gov/acad Karen Anderson GIS Specialist Phone: (207) 288-8724 E-mail: [email protected] Linda Gregory Botanist Phone: (207) 288-8725 E-mail: [email protected] iv USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park NatureServe Website: http://www.natureserve.org Jim Drake Project Manager Minneapolis Office 1101 West River Parkway, Suite 200 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 Phone: (612) 331-0729 E-mail: [email protected] Lesley Sneddon Senior Regional Ecologist Boston Office 11 Avenue de Lafayette, 5th Floor Boston, Massachusetts 02111 Phone: (617) 542-1908 E-mail: [email protected] Susan Gawler Plant Ecologist Gawler Conservation Services 256 Guptill Road Belgrade, Maine 04917 Phone: (207) 495-3513 E-mail: [email protected] v USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park Acknowledgements This project required the cooperation and assistance of many people in various locations within the United States. Many people played essential roles in this project. It has been a long process and the authors hope they have forgotten no one. Acadia National Park: Field assistants Chelsea O’Connell-Barlow, Geneva Chase, Norman Forder, Dafna Reiner, and Maria Trinh maintained good outlooks and high data standards in the field despite demanding schedules and bulky global positioning system (GPS) equipment. Glen Mittelhauser gladly made his data from island forest sampling available to round out forest type descriptions. Karen Anderson converted maps and other data to geographical information system (GIS) layers for analysis. Linda Gregory provided botanical expertise, logistical support, and mighty fine Isle au Haut burritos. U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center: Mel Bower and Tom Owens devoted several intense days to help with gradsect (gradient directed transect sampling) analysis (see online glossary of terms <http://biology.usgs.gov/npsveg/glossary.html>). Christine Calogero and Janis Boyd automated our interpreted polygons to produce the digital map coverage, and provided their skills in developing other geographic information system (GIS) data layers that support the mapping project. Maine Natural Areas Program: Brian Carlson tirelessly worked to convert field data into computer files accessible for analysis, and ensured attention to details. He also scanned slides and assisted with many tasks through the analysis phase of this project. Sarah Evans converted the data into the proper format to match The Nature Conservancy (TNC) database and, along with Emily Pinkham, will be responsible for recording the presence of rare communities or selected examples of common communities into our Biological and Conservation Database. Emily also tracked the finances. Ecologists Andy Cutko and Don Cameron contributed data from their independent field surveys in the region. Curry Caputo and Keith Pearson assisted in final production of this report. Molly Docherty, program director, administered the contract. Dan Coker redesigned our plots database to agree with TNC plots database and helped with many database design and data handling questions. The Nature Conservancy and the NatureServe: Denny Grossman (Home Office) provided insight into the Mapping Program process and acted as a sounding board for questions. Meredith Hammon (Eastern Regional Office) helped compile the Kuchler data into a useful format for our early vegetation types list. Mark Anderson and Lesley Sneddon (Eastern Regional Office) supervised the standard vegetation classification. Jim Drake (Midwest Regional Office) had the task of overseeing the large contract between TNC/NatureServe and the USGS. Without his help and oversight, as well as that of Tony Curtis from whom Jim inherited this responsibility, this project would not have been possible. A large thank you to all involved, both those listed and those unacknowledged. vi USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park Contents Contacts ....................................................................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................................... vi Figures..........................................................................................................................................................................ix Tables ...........................................................................................................................................................................ix Summary........................................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................3 Objective of the U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program ............................3 The National Vegetation Classification System.......................................................................................................3 Ecological Setting of Acadia National Park.............................................................................................................5 Previous Vegetation Studies ....................................................................................................................................8 Participants, Responsibilities, and Meeting Summary.............................................................................................8 Methods .......................................................................................................................................................................11 Aerial Photography Acquisition.............................................................................................................................11 Fieldwork for Vegetation Classification Development..........................................................................................12 Draft List of Vegetation Community Types.....................................................................................................12 Gradient Directed Transect (Gradsect) Sampling Analysis .............................................................................13 Field Reconnaissance.......................................................................................................................................14 Field Sampling .................................................................................................................................................14 Vegetation Data Analysis for Vegetation Classification Development .................................................................17 Mapping the Vegetation of Acadia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Willows of Interior Alaska
    1 Willows of Interior Alaska Dominique M. Collet US Fish and Wildlife Service 2004 2 Willows of Interior Alaska Acknowledgements The development of this willow guide has been made possible thanks to funding from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service- Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge - order 70181-12-M692. Funding for printing was made available through a collaborative partnership of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Alaska, Department of Defense; Pacific North- west Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture; National Park Service, and Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior; and Bonanza Creek Long Term Ecological Research Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks. The data for the distribution maps were provided by George Argus, Al Batten, Garry Davies, Rob deVelice, and Carolyn Parker. Carol Griswold, George Argus, Les Viereck and Delia Person provided much improvement to the manuscript by their careful editing and suggestions. I want to thank Delia Person, of the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, for initiating and following through with the development and printing of this guide. Most of all, I am especially grateful to Pamela Houston whose support made the writing of this guide possible. Any errors or omissions are solely the responsibility of the author. Disclaimer This publication is designed to provide accurate information on willows from interior Alaska. If expert knowledge is required, services of an experienced botanist should be sought. Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Taraxacum Microspecies Along Soil Property Gradients in Salt and Brackish Meadows on the Polish Baltic Coast
    Acta Bot. Croat. 78 (1), 35–45, 2019 CODEN: ABCRA 25 DOI: 10.2478/botcro-2019-0001 ISSN 0365-0588 eISSN 1847-8476 Distribution of Taraxacum microspecies along soil property gradients in salt and brackish meadows on the Polish Baltic coast Beata Bosiacka1*, Helena Więcław1, Paweł Marciniuk2, Marek Podlasiński3 1 Department of Plant Taxonomy and Phytogeography, Faculty of Biology, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland 2 Department of Botany, University of Podlasie, Prusa 12, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland 3 Department of Land Recultivation and Environmental Chemistry, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Słowackiego 14, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland Abstract – The vegetation of protected salt meadows along the Baltic coast is fairly well known; however, dandeli- ons have been so far treated as a collective species. The aim of our study was to examine the microspecies diversity of the genus Taraxacum in Polish salt and brackish coastal meadows and to analyse soil property preferences of the dandelion microspecies identified. In addition, we analysed the relations between soil properties and vegetation patterns in dandelion-supporting coastal meadows (by canonical correspondence analysis). The salt and brackish meadows along the Polish Baltic coast we visited were found to support a total of 27 dandelion microspecies repre- senting 5 sections. Analysis of vegetation patterns showed all the soil parameters (C:N ratio, organic matter con- tent, pH, concentration of Mg, P, K, electrolytic conductivity of the saturated soil extract ECe) to explain 32.07% of the total variance in the species data. The maximum abundance of most dandelion microspecies was associated with the highest soil fertility, moderate pH values and organic matter content, and with the lowest magnesium con- tent and soil salinity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Walk in the Park and Silver Maple, with the Best Features of Each
    11. Autumn Blaze Maple (Acer x Freemanii) 16. Northern Red Oak (Quercus rubra ) Memorial Tree. This tree is a hybrid cross of red Similar in size to the white oak but has leaves A Walk in the Park and silver maple, with the best features of each. that have 5-11 lobes with pointed tips Freeman maple cultivars typically grow fast and tapered from a broad base. Acorn is 1 inch Nature’s Canopy at have deeply lobed leaves with good structural long, with shallow cup and bitter taste. A Maple Street Park stability, and great fall color (like the red maple). It tree can produce 1,500 acorns annually. Bark grows well in challenging urban conditions. is smooth on young trees, has unbroken Essex Junction, Vermont vertical ridges on older ones. It needs lots of 12. White Pine (Pinus strobus ) A stately tree that is sunlight and is competitive on sandy soils. the only pine in the East with 5 needles in each Not a common city tree because it is difficult bundle. It reaches heights of 140 ft. and lives up to to grow successfully from a seedling. Wildlife 20 years. In pre-revolutionary times they were the love it because of the nutrients its acorns used for ship masts. It is often split into multiple provide. Red oak is a key host of gypsy stems high up due to the feeding of the terminal moths. bud by the white pine weevil ( Pissodes strobe ). Trees with this form are called cabbage pines. 17. Paper Birch (Betula papyrifera ) A pioneer 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Common Native Plants the Diversity of Acadia National Park Is Refl Ected in Its Plant Life; More Than 1,100 Plant Species Are Found Here
    National Park Service Acadia U.S. Department of the Interior Acadia National Park Checklist of Common Native Plants The diversity of Acadia National Park is refl ected in its plant life; more than 1,100 plant species are found here. This checklist groups the park’s most common plants into the communities where they are typically found. The plant’s growth form is indicated by “t” for trees and “s” for shrubs. To identify unfamiliar plants, consult a fi eld guide or visit the Wild Gardens of Acadia at Sieur de Monts Spring, where more than 400 plants are labeled and displayed in their habitats. All plants within Acadia National Park are protected. Please help protect the park’s fragile beauty by leaving plants in the condition that you fi nd them. Deciduous Woods ash, white t Fraxinus americana maple, mountain t Acer spicatum aspen, big-toothed t Populus grandidentata maple, red t Acer rubrum aspen, trembling t Populus tremuloides maple, striped t Acer pensylvanicum aster, large-leaved Aster macrophyllus maple, sugar t Acer saccharum beech, American t Fagus grandifolia mayfl ower, Canada Maianthemum canadense birch, paper t Betula papyrifera oak, red t Quercus rubra birch, yellow t Betula alleghaniesis pine, white t Pinus strobus blueberry, low sweet s Vaccinium angustifolium pyrola, round-leaved Pyrola americana bunchberry Cornus canadensis sarsaparilla, wild Aralia nudicaulis bush-honeysuckle s Diervilla lonicera saxifrage, early Saxifraga virginiensis cherry, pin t Prunus pensylvanica shadbush or serviceberry s,t Amelanchier spp. cherry, choke t Prunus virginiana Solomon’s seal, false Maianthemum racemosum elder, red-berried or s Sambucus racemosa ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Radial Growth and Ring Formation Process in Clonal Plant Eriophorum Angustifolium on Post-Mined Peatland in the Šumava Mts., Czech Republic
    Ann. Bot. Fennici 45: 44–54 ISSN 0003-3847 (print) ISSN 1797-2442 (online) Helsinki 29 February 2008 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2008 Radial growth and ring formation process in clonal plant Eriophorum angustifolium on post-mined peatland in the Šumava Mts., Czech Republic Vojtěch Lanta1,2,*, Štěpán Janeček1 & Jiří Doležal1,2 1) Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Section of Plant Ecology, Dukelská 135, CZ-379 82 Třeboň, Czech Republic (*e-mail: [email protected]) 2) Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic Received 9 Feb. 2007, revised version received 14 Aug. 2007, accepted 24 Sep. 2007 Lanta, V., Janeček, Š & Doležal, J. 2008: Radial growth and ring formation process in clonal plant Eriophorum angustifolium on post-mined peatland in the Šumava Mts., Czech Republic. — Ann. Bot. Fennici 45: 44–54. Eriophorum angustifolium (Cyperaceae) is a pioneer clonal sedge colonizing bare peat surface of harvested peatlands in central Europe. It forms circular patches of densely aggregated ramets, followed by central die-back and ring formation as circles develop. This study experimentally tested the importance of inter-ramet competition, interfer- ence with litter, soil nutrient depletion, and architectural constraints for radial clonal spread and ring formation process. Effects of fertilization, litter addition and competi- tion of neighbor ramets on growth and survival of tillers transplanted into four distinct zones within individual circle were detected only in the first zone (green band) with high ramet density. This suggested that both above-ground competition for light and below-ground competition for soil nutrients can play an important role in population dynamics of E.
    [Show full text]
  • ON the WOODY PLANTS of Llasca PARK a MAJOR REPORT
    .. \ PATTERNS AND INTEI~ SITY OF WHI'l'E•TAILED DEER BROWSING ON THE WOODY PLANTS OF llASCA PARK ~ -·• .-:~~ -"7,"l!'~C .-'";"'l.;'3. • ..., 1; ;-:_ . .. ..... .. ;_., ( •• ~ -· ., : A MAJOR REPORT ~ i ..,; ·:-.:.. _, j i... ...... .. .' J £70 q ... c a:s·:, >rse·- _....,. •e '~· SUBMITTED TO THE.. SCHOOL OF FORESTRY By DONALD N. ORKE •' IN: PARTIAL FULFILU1ENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS. FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE OCTOBER, 1966 - .. ,,..\ ., ..- ./ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to thank the School of Forestry . :-~~ ..·,. for providing the, financial assistance needed to conduct the study. Also, special thf.llks ·are due to Dr. Henry L. Hansen who provided help:f'ul advice in th• preparation of. this report • .. - ' TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 HISTORY OF THE ITASCA DEER HERD AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE VEGETATION ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••• 2 LITERATURE REVIEW •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 5 STUDY AREA ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • 11 METH<D.DS:i •••• . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .•• 13 RESULTS BROWSE PREFERENCES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 17 BROWSING ON KONIFER SEEDLINGS •••••••••••••••• 40 DISCUSSION BROWSE PREFERENCES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 51 BROWSING ON CONIFER SEEDLINGS •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • .54 SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE STUDIES ••••••••••••••• 56 SUMMA.RY • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 5 7 LITERATURE CITED ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• a.• .. 59 APPENDIX •••••••••••••••••••••• e ••••••••••••••••••••• 61 ,-·. INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Rubus Arcticus Ssp. Acaulis Is Also Appreciated
    Rubus arcticus L. ssp. acaulis (Michaux) Focke (dwarf raspberry): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project October 18, 2006 Juanita A. R. Ladyman, Ph.D. JnJ Associates LLC 6760 S. Kit Carson Cir E. Centennial, CO 80122 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Ladyman, J.A.R. (2006, October 18). Rubus arcticus L. ssp. acaulis (Michaux) Focke (dwarf raspberry): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http:// www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/rubusarcticussspacaulis.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The time spent and help given by all the people and institutions mentioned in the reference section are gratefully acknowledged. I would also like to thank the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, in particular Bonnie Heidel, and the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, in particular David Anderson, for their generosity in making their records available. The data provided by Lynn Black of the DAO Herbarium and National Vascular Plant Identification Service in Ontario, Marta Donovan and Jenifer Penny of the British Columbia Conservation Data Center, Jane Bowles of University of Western Ontario Herbarium, Dr. Kadri Karp of the Aianduse Instituut in Tartu, Greg Karow of the Bighorn National Forest, Cathy Seibert of the University of Montana Herbarium, Dr. Anita Cholewa of the University of Minnesota Herbarium, Dr. Debra Trock of the Michigan State University Herbarium, John Rintoul of the Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, and Prof. Ron Hartman and Joy Handley of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium at Laramie, were all very valuable in producing this assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruit Production in Cranberry (Ericaceae: Vaccinium Macrocarpon): a Bet-Hedging Strategy to Optimize Reproductive Effort1
    American Journal of Botany 93(6): 910–916. 2006. FRUIT PRODUCTION IN CRANBERRY (ERICACEAE: VACCINIUM MACROCARPON): A BET-HEDGING STRATEGY TO OPTIMIZE REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT1 ADAM O. BROWN2 AND JEREMY N. MCNEIL3 Department of Biology, Laval University, Quebec City, G1K 7P4 Canada In the cultivated cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon), reproductive stems produce 1–3 fruit even though they usually have 5–7 flowers in the spring. We undertook experiments to test the hypothesis that this was an adaptive life history strategy associated with reproductive effort rather than simply the result of insufficient pollination. We compared fruit production on naturally pollinated plants with those that were either manually pollinated or that were caged to exclude insects. Clearly, insects are necessary for the effective pollination of cranberry plants, but hand pollination of all flowers did not result in an increase in fruit number. Most of the upper flowers, which had significantly fewer ovules than did the lower flowers, aborted naturally soon after pollination. However, when the lower flower buds were removed, the upper flowers produced fruit. This suggests that the upper flowers may serve as a backup if the earlier blooming lower ones are lost early in the season. Furthermore, the late-blooming flowers may still contribute to the plant’s reproductive success as visiting pollinators remove the pollen, which could serve to sire fruit on other plants. These results are discussed in the context of their possible evolutionary and proximate causes. Key words:
    [Show full text]
  • Rosa Canina Linnaeus Common Names: Dog Rose, Dog Brier, Wild Rose (5,6,13)
    Rosa canina Linnaeus Common Names: Dog rose, dog brier, wild rose (5,6,13). Etymology: ‘Rosa’ is the Latin word for ‘rose’, and ‘canina’ in Latin means ‘of a dog’ or ‘mean’ (1,3). Botanical synonyms: Rosa corymbifera Borkh., R. dumetorum Thuill., and R. ciliatosepala Blocki (2,6). FAMILY: Rosaceae, the rose family (1) Quick Notable Features: ¬ Alternate, odd-pinnately compound, serrate leaves ¬ Conspicuous stipules, fused to petiole ¬ Showy white/pink flowers with many stamens and pistils in a hypanthium ¬ Bright red hips with no sepals Plant Height: R. canina grows up to 3m tall (10). Subspecies/varieties recognized (6,7): Rosa canina var. dumetorum (Thuill.) Poir., Rosa canina var. canina L., Rosa canina var. corymbifera Rouy, Rosa canina var. andegavensis Arechav., Rosa canina var. evanida (Christ) P.V.Heath, Rosa canina var. frutetorum (Besser) P.V.Heath, Rosa canina var. libertiae (Dumort.) P.V.Heath, Rosa canina var. Montana (Vill.) P.V.Heath, Rosa canina var. sepium Arechav., Rosa canina var. subcanina (Christ) P.V.Heath, Rosa canina subsp. andegavensis (Bastard) Vigo, Rosa canina subsp. virens (Wahlenb.) Šmite. Most Likely Confused with: Rosa eglanteria, R. micrantha, R. setigera, R multiflora, and Rubus ssp. (1,9). Habitat Preference: The species is found in open, disturbed habitats such as roadsides, old pastures, fields, dry banks, and thickets. R. canina requires at least partial sun, and high levels of soil moisture (1,5,9,10). Geographic Distribution in Michigan: The species grows in six counties of the lower peninsula: Benzie, Hillsdale, Kent, Leelanau, Lenawee, and Wayne (2,19). Known Elevational Distribution: In Turkey, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska
    The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Taxonomy of Dipsacales, with Special Reference to Sinadoxa and Tetradoxa (Adoxaceae)
    PHYLOGENY AND PHYLOGENETIC TAXONOMY OF DIPSACALES, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SINADOXA AND TETRADOXA (ADOXACEAE) MICHAEL J. DONOGHUE,1 TORSTEN ERIKSSON,2 PATRICK A. REEVES,3 AND RICHARD G. OLMSTEAD 3 Abstract. To further clarify phylogenetic relationships within Dipsacales,we analyzed new and previously pub- lished rbcL sequences, alone and in combination with morphological data. We also examined relationships within Adoxaceae using rbcL and nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. We conclude from these analyses that Dipsacales comprise two major lineages:Adoxaceae and Caprifoliaceae (sensu Judd et al.,1994), which both contain elements of traditional Caprifoliaceae.Within Adoxaceae, the following relation- ships are strongly supported: (Viburnum (Sambucus (Sinadoxa (Tetradoxa, Adoxa)))). Combined analyses of C ap ri foliaceae yield the fo l l ow i n g : ( C ap ri folieae (Diervilleae (Linnaeeae (Morinaceae (Dipsacaceae (Triplostegia,Valerianaceae)))))). On the basis of these results we provide phylogenetic definitions for the names of several major clades. Within Adoxaceae, Adoxina refers to the clade including Sinadoxa, Tetradoxa, and Adoxa.This lineage is marked by herbaceous habit, reduction in the number of perianth parts,nectaries of mul- ticellular hairs on the perianth,and bifid stamens. The clade including Morinaceae,Valerianaceae, Triplostegia, and Dipsacaceae is here named Valerina. Probable synapomorphies include herbaceousness,presence of an epi- calyx (lost or modified in Valerianaceae), reduced endosperm,and distinctive chemistry, including production of monoterpenoids. The clade containing Valerina plus Linnaeeae we name Linnina. This lineage is distinguished by reduction to four (or fewer) stamens, by abortion of two of the three carpels,and possibly by supernumerary inflorescences bracts. Keywords: Adoxaceae, Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacales, ITS, morphological characters, phylogeny, phylogenetic taxonomy, phylogenetic nomenclature, rbcL, Sinadoxa, Tetradoxa.
    [Show full text]