DOCSLIB.ORG

A/HRC/6/19 28 November 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A/HRC/6/19 28 November 2007 UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/6/19 28 November 2007 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Sixth session Agenda item 4 HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATIONS THAT REQUIRE THE COUNCIL’S ATTENTION Final report on the situation of human rights in Darfur prepared by the group of experts mandated by the Human Rights Council in its resolution 4/8, presided by the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Sudan and composed of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for children and armed conflict, the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the situation of human rights defenders, the Representative of the Secretary-General on the human rights of internally displaced persons and the Special Rapporteur on the question of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment* * The annexes to the present report are circulated as received in the language of submission and in Arabic and French only. GE.07-14979 (E) 301107 A/HRC/6/19 page 2 Summary The mandate of the group of experts, comprising seven mandate holders, was established on 30 March 2007 by the Human Rights Council in its resolution 4/8 to ensure effective follow-up to and foster the implementation of resolutions and recommendations on Darfur, as adopted by the Council, the Commission on Human Rights and other United Nations human rights institutions, as well as to promote the implementation of relevant recommendations of other United Nations human rights mechanisms, taking into account the needs of the Sudan, ensuring the consistency of these recommendations and contributing to the monitoring of the human rights situation on the ground. The group of experts submitted its first report to the Council at its fifth session (A/HRC/5/6). The report, in which the group developed its methodology, contained a list of recommendations in its annex I. Presented in chart form, the recommendations indicate the steps required of the Government of the Sudan to implement each recommendation, over the short and medium term. In its resolution OM/1/3, adopted on 20 June 2007, the Council requested the group of experts to continue its work for six months and to submit an update to the session of the Council in September 2007 and a final report to the following session of the Council. After having presented its interim report in September 2007 (A/HRC/6/7), the group of experts now submits its final report pursuant to that resolution. In the present report, the group of experts reviews the efforts of the Government of the Sudan in implementing the recommendations of the group, using the indicators it put forward in its first report, on the basis of information that the group received from the Government in written and oral form, as well as from other sources, including United Nations and African Union agencies, bodies and programmes with operational competence in Darfur. The group of experts concludes that the process of cooperative engagement with the Government of the Sudan has worked well in procedural terms. However, in terms of substance, it observes that few recommendations have been fully implemented or reportedly had a tangible impact on the ground. Several recommendations that were prioritized as short-term and could have been implemented within three months, given that they did not require lengthy administrative processes or additional resources, have not yet been implemented. While initial steps have been made by the Government with regard to many of the recommendations, they have not yet yielded a sufficient impact on the ground according to reports received from organizations operational in Darfur. Finally, a significant number of recommendations have not been addressed by the Government at all. The group of experts, while acknowledging the activities undertaken by the Government of the Sudan to date, is concerned that reports received clearly indicate that, with very few exceptions, those efforts have not yet led to an improvement of the situation of human rights in Darfur. The group of experts recalls the Council’s consensus on the seriousness of the ongoing violations of human rights and international humanitarian law and the urgent need to focus on the implementation of existing recommendations to enhance the human rights situation in Darfur, and urges the Government to implement fully the prioritized recommendations without further delay. A/HRC/6/19 page 3 The group recommends that the Human Rights Council continue the process of review in accordance with the time frames and indicators for assessing implementation developed by the group. While emphasizing that, as Human Rights Council resolution 4/8 clearly indicates, the group was established to ensure the effective follow-up and implementation of existing resolutions and recommendations on Darfur, and stressing the complementary nature of its mandate and that of the wider mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the Sudan, which covers all of the Sudan, the group indicates its readiness to continue the review process, unless this task is entrusted to the Special Rapporteur on the Sudan. It suggests that a renewed mandate should envisage the possibility of an assessment mission to the Sudan, including its Darfur region, and sufficient time for analysis of the implementation of medium-term recommendations, which expire on 20 June 2008. A/HRC/6/19 page 4 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 1 - 8 5 II. METHODS OF WORK ....................................................................... 9 - 11 6 III. ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................ 12 - 17 7 IV. STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS .... 18 - 53 8 A. Human rights protection ............................................................. 18 - 38 8 1. Protection of the civilian population, including internally displaced persons ................................................................. 18 - 21 8 2. Protection of women against violence ................................. 22 - 28 10 3. Children and armed conflict ................................................ 29 - 30 12 4. Protection against summary executions, arbitrary detentions, disappearances and torture ................................ 31 - 36 13 5. Protection of victims and witnesses ..................................... 37 - 38 14 B. Humanitarian access ................................................................... 39 - 44 15 C. Accountability and justice ........................................................... 45 - 50 17 D. Monitoring of implementation of recommendations .................. 51 - 53 18 V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................... 54 - 62 20 Annex I: Status of implementation of recommendations compiled by the group of experts on Darfur as per A/HRC/5/6 ...................................... 23 Annex II: List of documents received from the Government of the Sudan ..................... 105 A/HRC/6/19 page 5 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Arising out of its deep concern over the ongoing violations of human rights and international humanitarian law in Darfur, the Human Rights Council adopted without a vote at its fourth regular session, on 30 March 2007, resolution 4/8 on the follow-up to decision S-4/101 of 13 December 2006 adopted by the Council, at its fourth special session, entitled “Situation of human rights in Darfur”. 2. In its resolution 4/8, the Council decided to convene a group of seven mandate holders to work with the Government of the Sudan, the appropriate human rights mechanisms of the African Union and to closely consult with the Chairman of the Darfur-Darfur Dialogue and Consultation to ensure the effective follow-up and to foster the implementation of resolutions and recommendations on Darfur, as adopted by the Council, the Commission on Human Rights and other United Nations human rights institutions, as well as to promote the implementation of relevant recommendations of other United Nations human rights mechanisms, taking into account the needs of the Sudan in this regard, to safeguard the consistency of these recommendations and to contribute to monitoring the human rights situation on the ground. 3. The group of experts is presided over by Sima Samar, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Sudan, and is composed of Philip Alston, Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions; Radhika Coomaraswamy, Special Representative of the Secretary-General for children and armed conflict; Yakin Ertürk, Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences; Hina Jilani, Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the situation of human rights defenders; Walter Kälin, Representative of the Secretary-General on the human rights of internally displaced persons; and Manfred Nowak, Special Rapporteur on the question of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Mr. Kälin serves as rapporteur for the group of experts. The group of experts was serviced mainly by the Africa Unit of the Capacity-building Branch, the Special Procedures Branch, and a coordinator. 4. The group of experts recalls that it interprets its mandate as one aimed at ensuring effective follow-up to and fostering the implementation of relevant resolutions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Advance Edited Version Distr
    Advance edited version Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/6/19 28 November 2007 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Sixth session Agenda item 4 HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATIONS THAT REQUIRE THE COUNCIL’S ATTENTION Final report on the situation of human rights in Darfur prepared by the group of experts mandated by the Human Rights Council in its resolution 4/8, presided by the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Sudan and composed of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for children and armed conflict, the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the situation of human rights defenders, the Representative of the Secretary-General on the human rights of internally displaced persons and the Special Rapporteur on the question of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment* * The annexes to the present report are circulated as received in the language of submission and in Arabic and French only. A/HRC/6/19 page 2 Summary The mandate of the group of experts, comprising seven mandate holders, was established on 30 March 2007 by the Human Rights Council in its resolution 4/8 to ensure effective follow-up to and foster the implementation of resolutions and recommendations on Darfur, as adopted by the Council, the Commission on Human Rights and other United Nations human rights institutions, as well as to promote the implementation of relevant recommendations of other United Nations human rights mechanisms, taking into account the needs of the Sudan, ensuring the consistency of these recommendations and contributing to the monitoring of the human rights situation on the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • A Year of Campaigning a Year of Campaigning
    A YEAR OF CAMPAIGNING A YEAR OF CAMPAIGNING “They carried guns all the time. I was afraid of and petitions but by mobilizing public pressure the guns. Actually, I was in constant fear.” through street protests, vigils and direct These are the words of Fereh Musu Conteh, lobbying. Thousands of AI members respond who was abducted by an armed group during to Urgent Action appeals on behalf of the conflict in Sierra Leone when she was just individuals at immediate risk. Publicity 13 years old. through the news media and online takes AI’s “When there are guns, there are more message swiftly and in a range of languages to victims,” said Malya, a woman from Port-au- millions more. Prince, Haiti, describing the level of violence AI members invent creative and innovative in her neighbourhood. forms of activism, both online and on the Gun violence afflicts countries around the streets. In 2006, for example, AI Paraguay world – armed conflict and violent crime claim organized “toy gun swaps” in the run-up to the lives of men, women and children every Christmas, offering new toys to children in day. AI is part of a worldwide coalition exchange for toy weapons, and street theatre campaigning for a global Arms Trade Treaty in to persuade parents not to buy them. AI order to prevent the proliferation and misuse Morocco carried out a survey on poverty and of arms and so reduce the number of victims. government responsibility, and AI Australia In 2006, activists achieved a major victory sought the public’s view on the country’s new when the UN voted overwhelmingly to start anti-terror laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report (June 2006 – May 2007)
    Sven Torfinn/ Panos Pictures Panos Torfinn/ Sven Annual Report (June 2006 – May 2007) with Accounts Year overview When I started this role a year ago I knew think tanks and faith groups joining us. that to be effective Crisis Action had to work This growth in reach and partners means that internationally. Gone were the days when civil Crisis Action is now well placed to have even society could be constrained by the silos of state more impact during the next twelve months. boundaries. I’m confident that together we can make the Twelve months later we have established Crisis voice of civil society a new super power when it Actions in Germany and France, a hub office in comes to decisions of war and peace. Brussels and a temporary office in Portugal for the EU presidency (July-Dec 07). This growth has been achieved thanks to the support of partners and funders who have continued to back us because the Crisis Action model has been shown to work. Our role, as a professional facilitator of impact orientated campaigns around armed conflict, not only adds value but also impact to our partners' work. On both of our major campaigns during the last year - Iran and Darfur - we have helped our partners influence the debate and change policy. Our partner base – the foundation for all our work - has also increased three fold during the last Brendan Cox year with new aid agencies, human rights groups, Executive Director Our current partners include: Aegis Trust Church of England (International Office) Amnesty International UK Foreign Policy Centre British
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Ngos and the Sponsoring of Public Activism
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2007 Professional Publics/Private Citizens: Human Rights NGOs and the Sponsoring of Public Activism Christopher Todd Minnix University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Minnix, Christopher Todd, "Professional Publics/Private Citizens: Human Rights NGOs and the Sponsoring of Public Activism. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2007. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/407 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Christopher Todd Minnix entitled "Professional Publics/Private Citizens: Human Rights NGOs and the Sponsoring of Public Activism." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in English. Mary Jo Reiff, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Janet Atwill, Michael Keene, Rosalind Hackett Accepted
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Advocacy in Darfur: the Challenge of Neutrality
    hpg HPG Policy Brief 28 Humanitarian Policy Group October 2007 Humanitarian advocacy in Darfur: the challenge of neutrality id agencies are grappling with familiar problems around advocacy in Darfur. Key messages Long-recognised as a crisis of protection, and not solely of humani- • Humanitarian agencies have A compromised strict neutrality in order to tarian relief, difficult issues have emerged as to the roles aid actors should play in advocating for advocate on issues related to civilian measures to address civilian insecurity and insecurity in Darfur. A more ‘pragmatic’ conflict resolution. Where does the boundary lie form of neutrality is emerging: sufficiently between humanitarian questions and political non-partisan to facilitate access to or military ones? Should agencies call attention affected communities, while also to these issues, or should they also advocate for sufficiently flexible to allow advocacy. specific political or military measures? As • Aid actors concerned to retain access to Barbara Stocking, Oxfam’s chief executive, put it affected communities should do more to in a recent interview: ‘we think we’ve got to save define and safeguard this new form of lives today while trying to get the international neutrality. This may involve distancing community to sort out the bigger problem. Now themselves from other non-neutral we will do our absolute utmost to go to the edge campaigners. of that. We will try to give as much information • There is a lack of clarity around out, but not in ways that are challenging to the humanitarian actors’ role in advocacy. Khartoum government’ (Cohen, 2007). This can lead to aid actors overstepping humanitarian boundaries and being The difficulty lies in determining where drawn into discussions in which they have Stocking’s ‘edge’ lies.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Democracy
    Conference Report 1 | P a g e Contents page List of Acronyms 3 Acknowledgements 5 Foreword 6 Executive Summary 9 Chapter 1: Introduction and background to the conference 14 Chapter 2: Lessons and threads from existing research initiatives 20 Chapter 3: Experience sharing by CSOs 29 Chapter 4: Engagement with Pan African Institutions 36 Chapter 5: Survival strategies for CSOs under threat 44 Chapter 6: Promoting Constructive engagement between civil society and Governments 51 Chapter 7: Role of regional and continental institutions and instruments 56 Chapter 8: Building Effective Coalitions for Regional and International Solidarity 61 Chapter 9: Accountability through self regulation of CSOs 67 Chapter 10: Role of Donors in restrictive environments 70 Chapter 11: Recommendations and way forward 73 Appendix 1: List of participants 78 2 | P a g e List of acronyms ACHPR African Commission on Human and People‘s Rights ACPPP African Civil Society Platform on Principled Partnership APRM African Peer Review Mechanism AU African Union CCP-AU Centre for Citizens Participation on the African Union CSO Civil Society Organization EAC East African Community EACSOF East Africa Civil Society Forum ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States FES Friedrich Ebert Stiftung IDASA Institute of Democracy in Africa HRCC Human Rights Consultative Committee LGBTI Lesbians, Gays, Bisexual, Trans-Gender and Inter-Gender MACOSS Mauritius Council of Social Services OSI Open Society Institute OSISA Open Society Institute of Southern Africa OSIWA Open Society Initiative
    [Show full text]
  • ICC Prosecutor's First Darfur Case
    The MONITOR Journal of the Coalition for the International Criminal Court ISSUE NO. 34 / MAY-OCTOBER 2007 ICC Prosecutor’s First Darfur Case: Some Tough Challenges Ahead By Géraldine Mattioli** n 27 February 2007, the prosecutor of the Interna- tional Criminal Court (ICC) applied to Pre-Trial OChamber I for summonses against State Minister Ahmed Harun and Janjaweed militia leader Ali Kushayb, who are alleged to have committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Darfur, Sudan. Arriving almost two years after the UN Security Council’s unprecedented refer- ral of the Darfur situation to the ICC, the nearly 100-page filing marks the start of the first Darfur case before the ICC. The prosecutor’s much-anticipated announcement was an important first step toward justice for the victims in Darfur. Thousands have endured land and air attacks and watched their villages burn. Many have been killed, tortured, raped or forced to leave their homes. It is estimated that 200,000 Darfurians have died and more than 2 million have been displaced since the beginning of the conflict in early 2003. The ICC prosecutor’s case is the first serious attempt to hold individuals criminally liable for their role in the events Victims from Darfur await food rations at a camp for the displaced. Credit: Darfur Consortium in Darfur. It sends a strong signal that such atrocities will no longer go unpunished. It also tests a different strategy Disappointment at a modest start for the ICC prosecutor, who in other cases (against DRC’s Thomas Lubanga and the leadership of Uganda’s Lord’s Re- Some have expressed skepticism and disappointment at the sistance Army) had sought sealed arrest warrants.
    [Show full text]
  • CRIS15 ACTION 2019 ANNUAL REPORT | 15Th ANNIVERSARY 1 Smart Collective Action Can Save Lives
    2019 CRIS15 ACTION 2019 ANNUAL REPORT | 15th ANNIVERSARY 1 Smart collective action can save lives. It can also protect democracies. CONTENTS 2 Digital Action 4 Summary of Impact 5 Statement of Board Chair & Executive Director 6 15 Years of Impact omplex problems cannot be resolved by any single With support from the Ford Foundation, MacArthur 8 Yemen Corganisation acting alone. That’s why Crisis Action Foundation, Luminate and Open Society Foundation, 12 South Sudan builds powerful coalitions from a global network of Digital Action will replicate the Crisis Action way of 16 Syria inspirational organisations and individuals. We seek no working to unlock ambitious collective action and drive public profile so we can be the honest broker for our change that strengthens democratic rights in a digital 20 Sudan partners, focused only on what makes civilians safer. The age. Digital Action will work to push back against digital 22 Working with Crisis Action threats to democracy, such as the weaponisation of power of this behind-the-scenes, strategic convening 23 Emergency Responses model could apply not only to saving civilians in conflicts, digital platforms to destabilise and radicalise society, and but to other global issues like climate change, education irresponsible data gathering and inscrutable algorithms. 24 Board and digital threats to democracy. 25 Donors & Philanthropic Partners In 2019, people’s struggle for human rights, equality and 26 Financials representation around the world was partially enabled Find out more at digitalaction.co and read about 28 Core Partners the Crisis Action model at creativecoalitions.org. by, and played out on, digital platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • RC-6-2006-0512 EN.Pdf
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Session document 27.9.2006 B6-0512/2006 } B6-0513/2006 } B6-0514/2006 } B6-0515/2006 } B6-0517/2006 } B6-0519/2006 } RC1 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 103(4) of the Rules of Procedure, by – Michael Gahler, Simon Coveney, Patrick Gaubert, Jana Hybášková, Filip Kaczmarek, Maria Martens, Mario Mauro, Jürgen Schröder and Anders Wijkman, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group – Pasqualina Napoletano, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Glenys Kinnock, Ana Maria Gomes and Elena Valenciano Martínez-Orozco, on behalf of the PSE Group – Marielle De Sarnez, Fiona Hall, Johan Van Hecke and Thierry Cornillet, on behalf of the ALDE Group – Marie-Hélène Aubert, Frithjof Schmidt, Angelika Beer and Margrete Auken, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group – Luisa Morgantini, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group – Eoin Ryan, on behalf of the UEN Group replacing the motions by the following groups: – Verts/ALE (B6-0512/2006) – PPE-DE (B6-0513/2006) – PSE (B6-0514/2006) – ALDE (B6-0515/2006) – GUE/NGL (B6-0517/2006) – UEN (B6-0519/2006) on the situation in Darfur RC\632531EN.doc PE 378.405v01-00} PE 378.406v01-00} PE 378.407v01-00} PE 378.408v01-00} PE 378.410v01-00} PE 378.412v01-00} RC1 EN EN European Parliament resolution on the situation in Darfur The European Parliament, – having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in Sudan and Darfur in particular, – having regard to relevant UN Security Council Resolutions, and in particular UN Security Council Resolution 1706 of 31 August 2006, – having regard to the AU decision of April 2004 to establish the Africa Mission in Sudan (AMIS), – having regard to the World Day for Darfur, 17 September 2006, – having regard to the Darfur Peace Agreement signed in Abuja, Nigeria, on 5 May 2006, – having regard to Rule 103(4) of its Rules of Procedure, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Discursive Dynamics and Darfur: Analyzing Narrative Complexity Behind
    Inter-Discursive Dynamics and Darfur: Analyzing Narrative Complexity Behind Responses of the United Nations and African Union, 2003-2006 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University by Kathryn E. Crewe Master of Public Policy Harvard University 2002 Director: Sara Cobb, Professor School of Conflict Analysis and Resolution Spring Semester 2015 George Mason University Fairfax, VA ! This!work!is!licensed!under!a!creative!commons!! attribution5noderivs!3.0!unported!license.! ii DEDICATION) This is dedicated to all of the people of Darfur, who deserve to write their own story, as well as my father, the original Dr. Crewe. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS) I would like to thank the many friends, relatives, and supporters who have helped me complete this dissertation. All of those I interviewed, who shall remain anonymous, generously contributed their time and honest input. My friend, Nicole, assisted me in transcribing hours and hours of interviews. My husband, Brian, patiently listened to me frame and reframe my research questions. My mother attended my conference presentations in Europe to show her support. Finally, thanks to Sara Cobb, Susan Hirsch, and Tojo Thatchenkerry for helping me translate ideas into words on paper. iv TABLE)OF)CONTENTS) Page List of Tables ................................................................................................................... viii! List of Figures ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report (June 2007 – May 2008) with Accounts
    Annual Report (June 2007 – May 2008) with Accounts Day for Darfur – Protestors in London mark five years of conflict Crisis Action may be small but it adds big value to our work on armed conflict, particularly “ by bringing together a wide range of organisations to inform the public and put concerted pressure on decision-makers. - Barbara Stocking, Director, ”Oxfam Chair’s Report In fact, one of the big Over the last twelve months Crisis Action has firmly challenges for Crisis Action established itself as the global hub for campaigning on armed in the year ahead will be to conflict. manage and consolidate its rapid growth, and continue It has experienced spectacular growth during that time, to respond to important and their highly dedicated team has done a wonderful job conflict issues with the speed, of catalyzing and driving forward campaigns on issues as flexibility and nous that are diverse as the humanitarian situation in Gaza, the International already its hallmarks. I’m Criminal Court’s arrest warrants against a Sudanese minister sure it will do so with all the and a Janjaweed commander, and government repression in professionalism and aplomb Burma - to name but a few. it has displayed to date, and as a result will go on to play Nick Grono, Deputy President, We are now seeing a clear demonstration effect as a result of an ever more effective role in International Crisis Group Crisis Action’s proven performance - the more that NGOs responding to armed conflicts in the future. witness its successes, the more they wish to engage the organisation on issues of importance to them, or join if they are not already partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Darfur: Reflections on the Crisis and the Responses
    Darfur: Reflections on the Crisis and the Responses Martello#35Book.indb 1 22/09/09 12:14 PM Martello#35Book.indb 2 22/09/09 12:14 PM Darfur: Reflections on the Crisis and the Responses J. Andrew Grant (ed.) Centre for International Relations, Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada 2009 Martello#35Book.indb 3 22/09/09 12:14 PM Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Darfur : reflections on the crisis and the responses / J. Andrew Grant (ed.). (Martello papers ; 35) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-1-55339-242-2 1. Sudan—History—Darfur Conflict, 2003-. 2. Humanitarian assistance, Canadian—Sudan—Darfur. 3. Humanitarian assistance—Sudan—Darfur. I. Grant, J. Andrew (John Andrew), 1974- II. Queen’s University (Kingston, Ont.). Centre for International Relations III. Series: Martello papers ; 35 DT159.6.D27D375 2009 962.404’3 C2009-905175-3 © Copyright 2009 Martello#35Book.indb 4 22/09/09 12:14 PM Martello Paper Series Queen’s University’s Centre for International Relations (QCIR) is pleased to present the latest in its series of monographs, the Martello Papers. Taking their name from the distinctive towers built during the nineteenth century to defend Kingston, Ontario, these papers cover a wide range of topics and issues in foreign and defence policy, and in the study of international peace and security. This Martello Paper brings together seven original papers based on presentations at a workshop on Darfur held at Queen’s University on March 17, 2007 and sponsored by the Centre for International Relations and the Ethnicity and Democratic Governance project. For more than five years, international concern with the humanitarian crisis in western Sudan has paralleled that with the armed interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq.
    [Show full text]