The Pompous Atheist

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Pompous Atheist THE POMPOUS ATHEIST Michael Baker ____________________________________________________ Essays on Atheism and Atheists THE POMPOUS ATHEIST Michael Baker © Copyright Michael Baker 2020 All rights reserved. Apart from fair dealing for the purpose of study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act (C’th) 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Inquiries should be made to the publisher at P O Box 1282, Goulburn NSW, Australia 2580. A catalogue record of this book is available from … Published by M J Baker in Goulburn, New South Wales, Australia ISBN … Digital conversion by Mark Smith The author, Michael Baker, is a retired lawyer who spent some 35 years, first as a barrister and then as a solicitor of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. His authority to offer the commentary and criticism on the philosophical and theological issues embraced in the text lies in his having studied at the feet of Fr Austin M Woodbury S.M., Ph.D., S.T.D., foremost philosopher and theologian of the Catholic Church in Australia in the twentieth century, and his assistant teachers at Sydney’s Aquinas Academy, John Ziegler, Geoffrey Deegan B.A., Ph.D. and Donald Boland Ll.B, Ph.D., between 1964 and 1971. This work is the fruit of cooperation between the author and Dr Mark Smith who has managed the website superflumina.org for the best part of twenty years. Cover—The atheist François-Marie Aroet (Voltaire) 1694-1778 by sculptor Jean-Antoine Houdon Ad Majoriam Dei Gloriam Our Lady of Perpetual Succour Ave Regina Caelorum, Ave Domina Angelorum. Salve Radix, Salve Porta, ex qua mundo Lux est orta ; Gaude Virgo Gloriosa, super omnes speciosa : Vale, O valde decora, et pro nobis Christum exora. V. Ora pro nobis sancta Dei Genetrix. R. Ut digni efficiamur promissionibus Christi. THE POMPOUS ATHEIST Index Introduction Pity the Poor Atheist The Pompous Atheist Atheism & the Abuse of Women An Atheist approaches his End Suicide The Two Rabbits Dear Reader of The Wall Street Journal Scrutiny of Gunning for God Decoding David Attenborough Shaking the Darwinian Foundations The God Particle? The Clumsiness of Lawrence M Krauss Eternity INTRODUCTION In his celebrated television series of the 1960s, Civilisation, Sir Colin Clark described the face of Voltaire by Houdon as ‘the smile of reason’ and the Enlightenment as the age of reason. But the reason of the Enlightenment was a disordered reason, more mad than rational, a reason removed from its proper setting in reality, the whole of reality not just that part the ‘enlightened’ thinker thought important. The disorder was to show itself in the revolution in France that followed. There is a parallel in the influence the appalling Sartre exercised over Cambodia’s murderous Pol Pot. The mindset of the Enlightenment recalls Chesterton’s remark that the madman is not the one who has lost his reason but the one who has lost everything except his reason. Purists will deny Voltaire was an atheist; insist he was a deist, one who accepted God’s existence but rejected all Divine revelation: a ‘freethinker’. But Deism was a device that sought to avoid the charge of atheism by insisting the only God Deists would accept was one arrived at by reason. But their ‘reason’ was selective. They rejected the rational conclusions that follow inevitably on the acknowledgement of God’s existence, namely, o that he is possessed of a far greater intellect than the intellects he had created; o that he must be a person; o that he must be living; o that it is reasonable to conclude that he has communicated with man, the highest of his creatures; that this communication—this revelation of himself—must be susceptible of testing through miracles, consistent with St Thomas Aquinas’s comment that “a visible action that can only be divine reveals an invisibly inspired teacher of truth”. (Summa Contra Gentes Bk. I, 6 [4]) Deism was atheism by another name, a charge demonstrated by Voltaire’s rejection of all religion and particularly Catholicism. There has been no epoch in the history of mankind to compare with that of the last fifty years for abandonment of belief in God. This book addresses that phenomenon and its chief precipitating cause, the abandonment by the bishops of the Catholic Church under the influence of two popes of the Church’s claim to be the one true religion on earth founded by God for man’s salvation. It consists of a series of essays published over the years 2007 to 2019 on the website superflumina.org. It mocks those who promote the atheistic claim for abandonment of reason based in reality in favour of one grounded in popular opinion and the limitations of the philosophy of materialism. It relates the effects of the abandonment of belief in God on men’s thinking and acting. The essays are presented in an order which departs from the chronology of their original publication. There is, perforce, some dated-ness in the reference to events but the reader should have little trouble in adjusting to the temporal discrepancies. There is some repetition in expression which I trust the reader will forgive. I have made some amendments to the texts of several of them. Michael Baker February 2020 PITY THE POOR ATHEIST Fifteen centuries ago, as he awaited his execution, the Roman Consul, Boethius, remarked the ubiquity and the majesty of order in the world, the concord governing it in every element— When Spring brings in her heat to warm the cold The new year’s flowers’ sweet breath succeeds the old: Summer’s torrid days will dry and brown But Autumn brings her fruit with trees bowed down. Then Winter will produce the falling rain That brings to birth and nourishes again All things on earth that breathe the breath of life...1 His work, The Consolation of Philosophy, serves as a reminder of the fundamental rift between the modern world and its patrimony. For more than a thousand years it was not just the works of theology, but this philosophical work of the Christian Socrates that inspired western society. Scholars translated it from the Latin into numerous of the languages of Europe—King Alfred the Great into Anglo-Saxon, Chaucer into Middle English and Protestant Queen Elizabeth I into the ancestor of our own modern English. In the year 1500 the intellectual atmosphere in which the peoples of the world lived was theistic: all the world believed in God. The few who denied his existence were regarded as mad, were ostracised by society or executed as heretics. By the year 2000, in contrast, the atmosphere in which the world’s peoples lived had turned atheistic: vast numbers today deny God’s existence. We take the theism of the end of mediaeval times as much for granted as the atheism of our own. It never occurs to us to try to understand why there should have occurred such a paradigm shift. The belief in God inspired by the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages was not then—as it is not now—something only of faith: it was an intellectual thing. Today’s potted experts treat the shift as an inevitable effect of growth in natural knowledge. We know infinitely more than our forbears, the argument goes, so we have progressed beyond the superstitions that characterised their lives and times, such as belief in God. This judgement, grounded on the arrogant assumption of the superiority of one’s own age over that of every other, is historical parochialism. It reflects, in the temporal order, the gnostic pride which in the theological order, is characteristic of every heresy. It can be summed up in the short phrase: “We know better!” But the issue, theism/atheism, turns not on knowledge; it turns on reason, and reason is accessible to every age. In October 1517 the Catholic theologian, Martin Luther, forwarded his celebrated ‘Ninety five Theses’ on the power and efficacy of indulgences to the Archbishop of Mainz and Magdeburg. A scholarly disputation within the Church between Catholic 1 Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius (AD c.480-524), The Consolation of Philosophy, Book IV, vi. This transliteration of the author’s verse from the Latin text is mine. Boethius was remarkable for the breadth of his education in a civilisation, like our own, facing the collapse of social order at the end of an empire. The emperor Theodoric, an Arian heretic, arrested his Magister Officiorum, an orthodox Catholic, on a charge of treason and incarcerated him at Pavia. He had him executed the following year. Boethius’ case resembles that of Sir Thomas More under Henry VIII. More followed the example of the great Roman, writing his Dialogue of Comfort as he awaited his execution. and Catholic turned quickly to revolt when Luther declined to wait upon a ruling but appealed instead, via the newly invented printing press, to the popular will. His theses were translated into the vernacular, reproduced and speedily broadcast throughout Germany and Europe. Their publication brought Luther a following of others who shared his attitude. He appealed to ‘Christian freedom’ as he preached a doctrine of rebellion against the Church’s rule. In 1520 the Pope warned him (in the papal bull, Exsurge Domine) that he risked excommunication if he did not retract various of his assertions. His response was to burn the bull publicly and he was excommunicated on 3rd January 1521. One of those who defended the Church’s position joined the Pope in condemning Luther was Henry Tudor, King of England. Luther’s lapse into heresy flowed from personal moral problems.
Recommended publications
  • National Portrait Gallery of Australia Annual Report 13/14
    National Portrait Gallery of Australia Annual Report 13/14 National Portrait Gallery of Australia Annual Report 13/14 © National Portrait Gallery of Australia 2014 issn 2204-0811 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical (including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system), without permission from the publisher. This report is also accessible on the National Portrait Gallery’s website portrait.gov.au National Portrait Gallery King Edward Terrace Canberra, Australia Telephone (02) 6102 7000 portrait.gov.au 24 September 2014 Senator the Hon George Brandis qc Attorney-General Minister for the Arts Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Dear Minister On behalf of the National Portrait Gallery of Australia Board, I am pleased to submit the Gallery’s first independent annual report for presentation to each House of Parliament. The report covers the period 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014. This report is submitted in accordance with the National Portrait Gallery of Australia Act, 2012 and the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act, 1997. The Performance Report has been prepared according to the Commonwealth Authorities (Annual Reporting) Orders 2011. The financial statements were prepared in line with the Finance Minister’s Orders made under the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act, 1997. Yours sincerely Dr Helen Nugent ao Chairman national portrait gallery of australia annual report 2013/14 i Contents Chairman’s letter 3 Director’s report 7 Agency overview 13 Accountability and management 17 Performance summary 23 Report against corporate plan 27 Financial statements 49 Appendices 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ian's Thesis Outline
    NOTE: This online version of the thesis uses different fonts than the printed version held in Griffith University Library, and the pagination is slightly different. The content is otherwise exactly the same. ESSENCE AND DECISION. The Case of Coronation Hill. Ian Hamilton Holland B.Sc.(Hons) Syd. U., Grad.Dip.Pub.Pol. UNE. Australian School of Environmental Studies, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, January 1999. ii Abstract The rise of environmental issues has presented a challenge to decision-making in the area of natural resources policy. This challenge has met with diverse responses, ranging from neo-liberal attempts to incorporate environmental values into economic calculus, through ‘ecological rationalist’ arguments for the special nature of environmental issues, to radical theories of the state’s role in controlling the impact of environmental concerns on capitalist profitability. From this plethora of ideas about how to address environmental concern should emerge some directions that are more promising than others. But which? The Coronation Hill mine case, presented in this thesis, exemplified the complexities of natural resources decision-making in an environmental era. By analysis of the Resource Assessment Commission’s Inquiry into the Coronation Hill proposal, this thesis examines the strengths and weaknesses of the claims of different theoretical approaches. Such use of the single case to explore theory is exemplified by Allison’s work Essence of Decision. The RAC, as a neo-liberal institution, attempted to utilise both Pigouvian and Coasian strategies to address environmental issues. Both types of strategy emerge in the application of contingent valuation to preservation values.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside This Issue
    Inside this Issue Volume 49 • Number16 4 The • July Links 1997 between Economic Freedom and Social Cohesion Enemies of economic freedom argue that it damages the ARTICLES REGULAR FEATURES fabric of society, as the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. But what holds society together? And do the poor 1 Editorial really get poorer? Winton Bates The Governments policy-free zone is not only bad policy, 19 Economic Freedom as a Good in Itself but bad politics too Tony Rutherford Classical political freedom and economic freedom tend 3 From the Executive Director to go hand in hand. Not surprisingly, they have a lot in Globalization is not just a buzzword. Its a real and growing force common—not least their subversive tendencies Padraic that might just help rein in the excesses of government spending McGuinness Mike Nahan 4 Muddying the Waters... Most of us gain our information about the natural environment 21 The `R Files from the media. But what happens when they dont get it right? A close examination of the recent dealings of the WA A Perth-based geological consultant examines a recent case in Government over the proposed sale of its major gas pipeline The West Australian Peter Purcell shows just why governments shouldnt get involved in 6 The Pyrrhonist commerce Alan Moran Much as he appreciatesAunty. Brian Tucker has suffered the 23 Black and White slings and arrows of outrageous ABC misrepresentation at first Not many of us have read the Independent Member for hand. Perhaps fair reporting for fair resourcing might hold the Oxleysutterances on Aboriginal cannibalism.
    [Show full text]
  • French Nuclear Testing in the Pacific, 1995-1996, and Its Fallout For
    FRENCH NUCLEAR TESTING IN THE PACIFIC, 1995–96, AND ITS FALLOUT FOR FRENCH AUSTRALIANS1 MARGARET BARRETT Demoralised by the reverses of World War II, France in post-war years sought renewed self-respect and military independence through the development of a nuclear capability. Its atomic tests conducted in French Polynesia from 1966 aroused strong opposition in Pacific Rim countries, which applauded an indefinite moratorium declared in 1992. With the Cold War over, nuclear proliferation seemed to have been curbed. But on 13 June 1995 a newly elected French president, Jacques Chirac, announced that a further eight tests would take place before his government signed the projected Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in 1996. Australians protested vociferously, and even Paris heard the furore. This paper highlights two aspects of the controversy whose importance has been underestimated in other accounts. They are the precedent formed by Australian anti-French sentiment in the 1970s and 1980s, and the personally damaging and long-lasting effects of public acrimony on French Australians in 1995–1996. It is argued here that over-reactions in the Australian community to the renewal of French nuclear testing in the 1990s were understandable given increasing provocation by the French government over a period of thirty years or so. It is also claimed that although a supposedly democratic people might have been expected to treat fellow Australians of French descent more generously, such an outcome was unlikely in the circumstances. In the first part of the paper an inexorable deterioration in once-friendly relations between France and Australia is shown to have resulted from events in the latter part of the twentieth century—in particular the atmospheric testing of nuclear devices at Mururoa Atoll in the early 1970s and the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior in 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Compulsory Voting Laws on Government Spending" (2008)
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 7-2008 The ffecE t of Compulsory Voting Laws on Government Spending James Brookie Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the Economics Commons Recommended Citation Brookie, James, "The Effect of Compulsory Voting Laws on Government Spending" (2008). All Theses. 419. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/419 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECT OF COMPULSORY VOTING LAWS ON GOVERNMENT SPENDING A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Economics by James Harrison Brookie August 2008 Accepted by: Michael Maloney, Committee Chair Robert Tollison Laura Olson ABSTRACT The United States’ voter turnout is often cited as being disappointingly low. Compulsory voting laws are offered as a possible solution to increase voter turnout and overall political participation. Opponents of the law complain that voters affected will be more politically liberal and in turn seek to enlarge the size and scope of the government. In order to determine whether this is true, a test was run on the effect compulsory voting laws have on the government revenue of 109 nations. The data held that no significant relationship exists between the two variables observed. This paper will discuss compulsory laws and the controversy surrounding them and also offer possible explanations for why the predicted correlation was not found.
    [Show full text]
  • Of a 'Contested Ground' and an 'Indelible Stain'
    Of a ‘contested ground’ and an ‘indelible stain’: a difficult reconciliation between Australia and its Aboriginal history during the 1990s and 2000s Lorenzo Veracini This article proposes an interpretative narrative of the evolution of Aboriginal history as a scholarly enterprise during the 1990s and in more recent years.1 The 1990s were characterised by attempts to synthesise the interpretative traditions resulting from pre- vious decades of scholarly activity. In more recent years, the debate has shifted dramatically, dealing specifically with the genocidal nature of white Australia’s policy towards Aboriginal peoples. The most important passages in this process are associated with the 1992 Mabo decision by the Australian High Court and the publication of the Bringing them home report of 1997.2 During the 1990s, the relationship between particular political shifts and related historical writings in Australia was comprehensively transformed and became much more direct. The writing and interpretation of history have commonly been a site for direct political contestation, but in the 1990s political agendas became an informing fea- ture of historiographical debates more than in previous decades.3 One outstanding example of this tendency is John Howard’s successful domination of the political scene — an ascendancy based also on an explicit and unambiguous effort to ‘reconquer’ his- tory for the Liberal camp.4 In this context, an array of conservative opinions has challenged academic discourse. Nonetheless, both academic commentators and Aboriginal people successfully linked the ‘unsurrendered’ character of native title and, later, of Aboriginal sovereignty to both the resistential and the collaborative practices of 1. My review is selective.
    [Show full text]
  • Pauline, Politics and Psychoanalysis: Theorising Racism in Australia
    Pauline, Politics and Psychoanalysis THEORISING RACISM IN AUSTRALIA ANDREW WEAR Honours Thesis 1999 Department of Political Science, University of Melbourne Supervisor: Dr Graham Little 1999 Theorising Racism in Australia Andrew Wear Table of Contents Introduction 3 Chapter 1: Psychoanalytic Speculations on Racism 8 Chapter 2: Contemporary Australian Racism 24 Conclusion 41 Bibliography 43 2 1999 Theorising Racism in Australia Andrew Wear Introduction 1996 to 1998 was a dramatic and turbulent time in Australian political life. It was a time in which race - and racism - became the issue. While race has always been an unresolved issue lurking just below the surface of the Australian psyche 1, the rise to prominence of one woman enabled race-based politics to assume momentum not seen for a long time. Pauline Hanson was an unknown political novice when she was expelled from the Liberal Party during the 1996 election campaign. Prime Minister John Howard, seeking to prove his credentials on race, withdrew Liberal Party endorsement for Hanson in the safe Labor seat of Oxley for writing in the Queensland Times that assistance to aborigines had gone ‘too far’ and that: governments shower them with money, facilities and opportunities that only these people can obtain no matter how minute the indigenous blood is that flows through their brains... 2 Appearing as a Liberal on the ballot paper, Hanson secured a swing of 21 percent - the largest anti-Labor swing in the country - and comfortably won the seat. 3 The victory was hailed by many as a case of the hard-working underdog showing up an out of touch establishment.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Social Justice Report
    Social Justice Report 1998 © 1999 Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior permission from the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner, Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. Inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the Manager, Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 1042. ISSN 1321-11 Contents Foreword 1 Introduction: A Handful of Soil 2 Chapter 1: The Aftermarth for Indigenous People 13 Chapter 2: Non-Indigenous Community Response 27 Chapter 3: Church Responses 48 Chapter 4: Government Responses to the Recommendations of Bringing Them Home 53 Appendix 1: Letters to the Editor 83 Appendix 2: Selected Inventory of Apologies and National Sorry Day Events 89 Appendix 3: Text of Sorry Day Statement 92 Appendix 4: Summary of Governments’ Responses to Recommendations 94 Foreword This report presents various responses to Bringing Them Home, the Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from their Families. This is not done to re-open the substance of the Inquiry, its findings or the basis of its recommendations. The objective is to record the diverse range of responses and the perspectives they illustrate. The publication of Bringing Them Home had a marked impact on the Australian community. The ensuing public debate was sustained and intense. It stimulated the expression of views reflecting contemporary attitudes and values which directly and indirectly affect the circumstances of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal History Journal: Volume 25
    Aboriginal History Volume 25 2001 Aboriginal History Incorporated The Committee of Management and the Editorial Board Peter Read (Chair), Rob Paton (Secretary), Peter Grimshaw (Treasurer/Public Officer), Richard Baker, Gordon Briscoe, Ann Curthoys, Brian Egloff, Julie Finlayson, Geoff Gray, Niel Gunson, Luise Hercus, David Johnston, Harold Koch, Isabel McBryde, Ingereth Macfarlane, Francis Peters-Little, Deborah Bird Rose, Gary Shipp, Ian Howie-Willis, Elspeth Young. Correspondents Jeremy Beckett, Valerie Chapman, Ian Clark, Eve Fesl, Fay Gale, Ronald Lampert, Campbell Macknight, Ewan Morris, John Mulvaney, Andrew Markus, Bob Reece, Henry Reynolds, Lyndall Ryan, Bruce Shaw, Tom Stannage, Robert Tonkinson, James Urry. Aboriginal History is a refereed journal that aims to present articles and information in the field of Australian ethnohistory, particularly in the post-contact history of the Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders. Historical studies based on anthropological, archaeological, linguistic and sociological research, including comparative studies of other ethnic groups such as Pacific Islanders in Australia, will be welcomed. Issues include recorded oral traditions and biographies, narratives in local languages with translations, previously unpublished manuscript accounts, resumés of current events, archival and bibliographic articles, and book reviews. This volume of the journal is formally dated 2001, but is published in 2002. Aboriginal History is administered by an Editorial Board which is responsible for all unsigned material in the journal. Views and opinions expressed by the authors of signed articles and reviews are not necessarily shared by Board members. The editors invite authors to submit contributions to either the journal or monograph series for consideration; reviews will be commissioned by the reviews editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Australia "Had to Have" High Interest Rates
    CRA is a world leader in the productir~nof aluminium, iron ore, lead,zinc, silver, copper, gold, caul, diamonds and salt. For erample, CRA k A'gyIe Diamond Mines operations contribute over 37% of aN tbe diamonds mined in Austrulia. IPA REVIEW mABLISHED IN 1917 BY CHARLES KEMP. FOUNDING DlRECrOR OF THE INSITWE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS Vol. 44 No. 4 1991 Democracy in Trade Unions 5 Fred Nile, Offensive Books and Literary Stuart Wood Judgment Recent legislation has made SmnMoore union leaders less accountable. A heated dis Ute has broken out over calls for immoral booL to be removed from schools. One Vote, Different Value 9 Ron Brunton Allan Pidgeon Most governments in Australia are elected by minorities, but the worst gerrymander is resewed for Aborigines. Letters from Wiam Wentworth and Peter Hunt. Paying for Protection 13 Editorial John Stone The new censorship. We should level the playing tield internally even if we can't level it internationally. Indicators Australia's tax on children. Should a Consumption Tax Replace Payroll Taxes?.-. .. 22 Debate: Should voting be voluntary? John Freebairn Examined closely, the apparent benefits dissolve. Moore Economics Des Moore Republican Mischief Why Australia "had to have" high interest rates. Bruce A. Knox Press Index Why change what works? The Coalition's consumption tax. Republicanism. Edward VIII's Downfall R.J. Stove Strange Times Is a bad king a good reason to Ken Baker abolish the monarchy? Property rights recede, prostitutes' rights expand. The Flag: symbol of our national identity 32 Defending Australia Santo Sanloro Ham., Gelher - The flag is for all Australians, regardless of origins.
    [Show full text]
  • Material on John Anderson in the Sydney University Archives Compiled by Jim Packer, 2005-6 a Micro-Description of All John Ander
    Material on John Anderson in the Sydney University Archives Compiled by Jim Packer, 2005-6 A micro-description of all John Anderson material held in records in the University of Sydney Archives, drawn from an examination of the records themselves and using as a template the Guide to the Anderson Family Archives and other personal archives guides. Records examined include: SUA P42 John Anderson and Family Papers, as well as SUA P88 (A.K. Stout); P158 (Ruth Walker); P169 (Alexander Mackie and Family); P196 (W.H.C. Eddy); P198 (Tom Rose); P212 (David Stove); and SUA M (Miscellaneous) 237, 240, 242-3, 287, 307, 468. The numbering is based on the Guides produced by the University of Sydney Archives. The format follows the Series/Box/Item registration in the Guides (all in bold type). Where there are multiple components to an item and where these seem to require expansion, I have used / annotation to indicate this further expansion. These / annotations are not in the Guides and only itemize JA material. Abbreviations AET A.E. Taylor HE W.H.C.Eddy PL Peter Loveday AJA Sandy Anderson JA John Anderson rev. reverse AJB A.J. Baker JABH John Holland SA Samuel Alexander AJP Australasian Journal JAP John Passmore SEP Studies in Empirical of Philosophy; AJPP JBT J.B. Thornton Philosophy Australasian Journal of JCA Janet Anderson SH Sidney Hook (in JA) Philosophy and Psychology JCB Janet Anderson Soc Socrates (in JA) AKS A.K. Stout (unmarried) SP Subject [+] Predicate ARW Ruth Walker JLM John Mackie SSO Sidney Sparks Orr B Bosanquet (in JA) JMcA James McAuley S/T Space-Time BR Bertrand Russell (in JA) JMcI John MacIntyre ST&D Space, Time and D Descartes (in JA) K Kant (in JA) Deity DCS David Stove L Leibniz (in JA) TAR Tom Rose DJI D.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Jason Louis Pierce 2002
    Copyright by Jason Louis Pierce 2002 The Dissertation Committee for Jason Louis Pierce Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Judicial Entrepreneurism and the Politics of Institutional Change: An Analysis of the Recent Judicial Role Transformation in the High Court of Australia Committee: John C. Higley, Co-Supervisor Hersel Watson Perry, Jr., Co-Supervisor Gary P. Freeman David A. Anderson Sanford V. Levinson Judicial Entrepreneurism and the Politics of Institutional Change: An Analysis of the Recent Judicial Role Transformation in the High Court of Australia by Jason Louis Pierce, B.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctorate of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2002 Dedication To Emily Acknowledgements Preliminary fieldwork for this dissertation began in 1997, when I spent a few months as a research intern at the Australian Parliament and the Australian National University in Canberra. Over the five ensuing years, an ever-growing group of individuals assisted me along the way. Let me state from the outset that this dissertation would have been impossible without the help and encouragement of numerous people. The dissertation draws heavily upon eighty-plus in-depth interviews that I conducted with Australia’s most senior appellate judges from 1997 to 2000. These interviews were conducted under conditions of anonymity, meaning that I draw quotations from the interviews, but I nowhere disclose who made particular comments. My informants agreed, however, to have their names listed as participants, which I have done as Appendix A.
    [Show full text]