Cenozoic Tectonic History of the South Georgia Microcontinent and Potential As a Barrier to Pacifi C-Atlantic Through fl Ow

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cenozoic Tectonic History of the South Georgia Microcontinent and Potential As a Barrier to Pacifi C-Atlantic Through fl Ow Cenozoic tectonic history of the South Georgia microcontinent and potential as a barrier to Pacifi c-Atlantic through fl ow Andrew Carter1, Mike Curtis2, and James Schwanethal3 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, UK 2British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK, and CASP, West Building 181A, Huntingdon, Cambridge CB3 ODH, UK 3Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK ABSTRACT seafl oor spreading location was at the eastern Cenozoic opening of the central Scotia Sea involved the tectonic translation of crustal blocks end of the North Scotia Ridge and that South to form the North Scotia Ridge, which today is a major topographic constriction to the fl ow of Georgia once belonged to part of an extended the deep Antarctic Circumpolar Current that keeps Antarctica thermally isolated from warmer continental margin along the Falkland Plateau ocean waters. How this ridge developed and whether it was a topographic barrier in the past are that formed as Gondwana broke up in Jurassic unknown. To address this we investigated the Cenozoic history of the South Georgia microcon- time (Eagles, 2010a). The motivation for this tinental block, the exposed part of the ridge. Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology data confi rm model was driven by the need to explain an ap- that the Cretaceous succession of turbidites exposed on South Georgia was stratigraphically parent defi cit in the translation of South Geor- connected to the Rocas Verdes backarc basin, part of the South America plate. Apatite thermo- gia accounted for by seafl oor spreading based chronometry results show that South Georgia had remained connected to South America until on a South American origin. Restoration using ca. 45–40 Ma; both record a distinct rapid cooling event at that time. Subsequent separation plate kinematic evidence can only account for from South America was accompanied by kilometer-scale reburial until inversion ca. 10 Ma, approximately half of the ~1600 km displace- coeval with the cessation of spreading at the West Scotia Ridge and collision between the South ment (Eagles et al., 2005). A position for South Georgia block and the Northeast Georgia Rise. Our results show that the South Georgia micro- Georgia on the Pacifi c margin of Gondwana continental block could not have been an emergent feature from ca. 40 Ma until 10 Ma. would require less transport to the east during opening of the Scotia Sea; it would mean that INTRODUCTION deformation structures in the Andean Cordil- the South Georgia block could not have served Considerable effort has been directed at un- lera, that drove inversion of the marginal ba- as an early proximal barrier to deep Pacifi c- derstanding the geological evolution of the Sco- sins, and the obduction of the Rocas Verdes Atlantic fl ow. To resolve these issues we exam- tia Sea region as seafl oor spreading in the West ophiolitic basement onto the continental mar- ined the provenance of Cretaceous turbidites Scotia Sea caused the opening of the deep Drake gin can be followed along strike from Tierra exposed on South Georgia using detrital zircon Passage oceanic gateway that paved the way for del Fuego into South Georgia (Dalziel et al., U-Pb geochronology and studied the island’s the thermal isolation of Antarctica by the deep 2013a). This phase of deformation is believed bedrock exhumation history using apatite ther- Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) (Dalziel to have caused uplift of the North Scotia Ridge mochronometry. et al., 2013a, 2013b). Because models of the and may have also initiated eastward transla- evolution of the ACC are tied to the tectonic tion of the South Georgia microcontinent by GEOLOGY reconstructions that restore microcontinental left-lateral ductile shearing. The geology of South Georgia (Fig. 2) is blocks and volcanic arcs to pre–seafl oor spread- However, plate kinematic data have, con- central to the debate about the original loca- ing locations, it is essential that pre-drift loca- troversially, been used to suggest that the pre– tion of this microcontinental block and its role tions are well defi ned. Furthermore, because the three main fronts to the modern ACC are steered by regional bathymetry (Fig. 1), models of the 75°W 65°W 55°W 45°W 35°W 25°W ancient ACC need to incorporate constraints as to where and when crustal blocks were barriers South Maurice 50°S- to ocean currents. Today the Subantarctic Front American Falkland Plateau and the Polar Front follow gaps in the North Ewing NE Plate Bank Georgia Scotia Ridge while the Southern Antarctic Cir- Magallanes Rise N. Scotia Ridge cumpolar Current Front takes an eastward path Fuegian AndesBasin Study 54°S- before heading north, turning around the eastern Area end of South Georgia; however, how much of a W. Scotia Shack Scotia Plate E barrier these ridges were in the past is unknown South leton Fracture zoneSea Scotia Sandwich 58°S- due in part to uncertainty about their pre-break- Sub-Antarctic Front Drake Sea Plate up location and subsequent drift history. Passage The conventional view (Dalziel et al., 1975, Polar Front 2013a; Livermore et al., 2007), based on inter- S. Scotia Ridge Southern Antarctic pretations that match the geology of the South 62°S- Circumpolar Antarctic Plate Georgia microcontinent with South America, Current Front Weddell Sea is that originally South Georgia occupied a position to the immediate southeast of Tierra Figure 1. Scotia Arc region; study area (Fig. 2), principal topographic features, and main fronts of Antarctic Circumpolar Current are indicated (generated by GeoMapApp; del Fuego from the Jurassic until the Ceno- www.geomapapp.org). Red lines show positions of Sub-Antarctic Front and South- zoic, when seafl oor spreading created the west ern Antarctic Circumpolar Current Front (Orsi et al., 1995) and Polar Front (Moore Scotia Sea. Late Cretaceous compressional et al., 1997). GEOLOGY, April 2014; v. 42; no. 4; p. 299–302; Data Repository item 2014112 | doi:10.1130/G35091.1 | Published online 10 February 2014 GEOLOGY© 2014 Geological | April Society 2014 | ofwww.gsapubs.org America. Gold Open Access: This paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY license. 299 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-pdf/42/4/299/3545229/299.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 38° W 37°30' 37° 36°30' 36° W 54° S SG5.14 36 ± 8 Ma N STROMNESS BAY AY SG467 SG369 12 ± 3 Ma 15 ± 3 Ma BARF PENINSULA CUMBERLAND B SG534 F 16 ± 2 Ma Late SG241 *SG389 10± 2 Ma 20 ± 3 Ma SG14 SG246 Annenkov SG1 *SG394 44 ± 5 Ma 17 ± 3 Ma Cumber- Sande- Island 80 ± 4 Ma Early 3.2 ± 0.2 Ma land Bay bugten Cooper Formation 27 ± 10 Ma Formation Formation Bay SG530 Formation 11 ± 1 Ma ANNENKOV Late SG9 Granitoid ISLAND Drygalski Larsen intrusions 79 ± 8 Ma PICKERSGILL Fjord Harbour Complex Complex ISLANDS SG11 Early 88 ± 4 Ma SG7 Salomon Novosilski Cooper 6.5 ± 0.5 Ma 10 ± 1 Ma Glacier Glacier Island Formation Formation Formation COOPER km ISLAND Sample No.: SG1 0102030 Pre-Jurassic Jurassic Cretaceous AFT Age: 80 ± 4 Ma SG22 AHe Age: 33 ± 19 Ma SG24 12 ± 2 Ma * SGxx used for detrital zircon U-Pb SG19 12 ± 2 Ma 21 ± 3 Ma Figure 2. Geological map of South Georgia Island; locations and apatite fi ssion track (AFT) central ages and ejection-corrected (U-Th)/He ages (AHe) of sampled rocks are indicated; map based on Curtis and Riley (2011). Age uncertainties are 1σ. during the opening of the Drake Passage. The south. The Rocas Verdes basin and continental edge of the Falkland Plateau, represented by a majority of the rock exposure is formed by two margin arc rocks terminate along the strike of Permian sample from the Falkland Islands (see laterally equivalent turbidite sequences depos- the mid-Cretaceous structures at the continental the GSA Data Repository1 for analytical details). ited by deep-sea fans in an Early Cretaceous margin immediately to the east of Isla Navarino, The results (Fig. 3) show a remarkable match to backarc basin. The 8-km-thick Cumberland leaving oceanic lithosphere to the south of Isla sources from the South Patagonian batholith, Bay Formation, which crops out over half of de los Estados and Burdwood Bank. The turbi- Jurassic volcanics, and the south Andean meta- the island, is a classic turbidite succession com- dite sequences that crop out on South Georgia morphic basement. The data do not fi t with an posed of andesitic volcaniclastic graywackes are therefore viewed as the missing part of the East Gondwana provenance (Eagles, 2010a) be- derived from a volcanic island arc (Tanner Fuegian Andes. By contrast, the alternative mod- cause Proterozoic to Cambrian age zircons are and MacDonald, 1982). The Sandebugten For- el for South Georgia, based on a passive margin largely absent. Our detrital zircon data thus sup- mation is also composed of turbiditic facies setting on the southern edge of the Falkland Pla- port a connection to the Rocas Verdes backarc rocks that are distinguished by their siliciclas- teau, suggests that other volcanic centers, such basin during the Early Cretaceous, as originally tic composition and the presence of trachytic as the Polarstern Bank near the southeast margin suggested by Dalziel et al. (1975). and dacitic fragments and felsitic and granitic of the Weddell Sea, could account for the silicic Apatite and zircon fi ssion track and apatite clasts sourced from the continental margin of a volcanic detritus (Eagles, 2010a). (U-Th)/He thermochronometry (AHe) results backarc basin (MacDonald et al., 1987). from bedrock samples (for analytical details, see The conventional view considers that the ge- RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION the Data Repository; see Fig.
Recommended publications
  • South Georgia and Antarctic Odyssey
    South Georgia and Antarctic Odyssey 30 November – 18 December 2019 | Greg Mortimer About Us Aurora Expeditions embodies the spirit of adventure, travelling to some of the most wild opportunity for adventure and discovery. Our highly experienced expedition team of and remote places on our planet. With over 28 years’ experience, our small group voyages naturalists, historians and destination specialists are passionate and knowledgeable – they allow for a truly intimate experience with nature. are the secret to a fulfilling and successful voyage. Our expeditions push the boundaries with flexible and innovative itineraries, exciting Whilst we are dedicated to providing a ‘trip of a lifetime’, we are also deeply committed to wildlife experiences and fascinating lectures. You’ll share your adventure with a group education and preservation of the environment. Our aim is to travel respectfully, creating of like-minded souls in a relaxed, casual atmosphere while making the most of every lifelong ambassadors for the protection of our destinations. DAY 1 | Saturday 30 November 2019 Ushuaia, Beagle Channel Position: 20:00 hours Course: 83° Wind Speed: 20 knots Barometer: 991 hPa & steady Latitude: 54°49’ S Wind Direction: W Air Temp: 6° C Longitude: 68°18’ W Sea Temp: 5° C Explore. Dream. Discover. —Mark Twain in the soft afternoon light. The wildlife bonanza was off to a good start with a plethora of seabirds circling the ship as we departed. Finally we are here on the Beagle Channel aboard our sparkling new ice-strengthened vessel. This afternoon in the wharf in Ushuaia we were treated to a true polar welcome, with On our port side stretched the beech forested slopes of Argentina, while Chile, its mountain an invigorating breeze sweeping the cobwebs of travel away.
    [Show full text]
  • Así Nació Ushuaia. Orígenes De La Ciudad Más Austral Del Mundo1
    Dossier. Reflexiones en torno a los estudios sobre Territorios Nacionales Así nació Ushuaia. Orígenes de la ciudad más austral del mundo1 Aroldo Canclini** LA VIDA EN EL FIN DEL MUNDO (1869-1884) Aunque en Ushuaia la vida tenía mucho de rutinario, la forma en que transcurrían las cosas en la población más austral del mundo merece ser consignada brevemente. Los recuerdos de los hijos de los misioneros -Lucas Bridges en su hermoso libro y su hermano Guillermo oralmente- son coincidentes y demuestran cómo quedaron marcados por aquella experiencia. El horario cotidiano cambió varias veces durante los años, pero podemos dar como ejemplo el que regía para el verano de 1876. Todos se levantaban a las cinco menos veinte y, antes de desayunarse a las seis, los misioneros dedicaban un rato a la lectura de la Biblia y a la oración en conjunto. A la hora citada, tocaba una campana para llamar a los indígenas quienes, luego de comer, se dedicaban a sus trabajos. Algunos cuidaban las cabras y vacas que se utilizaban para el consumo y otros cultivaban las huertas que todos tenían detrás de su casita. En algunas ocasiones, se construían cercos o caminos, por ejemplo desde la iglesia hasta la playa. De nueve a diez, se celebraba un culto para implorar la bendición divina durante el día y luego se daba alguna enseñanza a los hombres y mujeres, que después volvían a su trabajo. A la una de la tarde otra campana llamaba a almorzar y de dos a cinco y media se trabajaba nuevamente. Los sábados a la tarde y los domingos eran días de descanso.
    [Show full text]
  • Crean Traverse 2016 Report
    SOUTH GEORGIA – CREAN SHACKLETON TRAVERSE 2016 TRAVERSE TEAM PELAGIC CREW Cian d’Arcy (Ireland) Alec Hazell (UK) - Skipper Morgan d’Arcy (Ireland) Giselle Hazell (South Africa) Aileen Crean O’Brien (Ireland) Bill Sheppard (UK) Crag Jones (UK) – Joint Leader Stephen Venables (UK) – Joint Leader The Crean Glacier and Antarctic Bay from Trident Ridge This expedition was the culmination of many years dreaming and planning by Aileen Crean O’Brien, to follow in the steps of her grandfather Tom Crean on the centenary of his famous traverse with Shackleton and Worsley. Aileen was accompanied by her two sons, Cian and Morgan, and her partner Bill Sheppard, with Crag Jones and Stephen Venables as mountain leaders. Although five of the team were successful, an unlucky accident stopped Aileen herself from completing the traverse. !1 SOUTH GEORGIA – CREAN SHACKLETON TRAVERSE 2016 Salvesen and Crean teams at Grytviken The Crean team boarded Pelagic in Stanley on TRAVERSE – DAY 1 – October 8 September 17, reaching South Georgia the We left King Haakon Bay at 05.30, travelling following week. While waiting to rendezvous on skis, towing pulks. Some bare ice with Jones and Venables, they spent several necessitated wearing crampons for the initial days doing short day walks from anchorages climb onto the glacier. Thereafter, snow on the Barff Peninsula, guided by Alec and conditions were good. The weather was calm, Giselle Hazell, enjoying the same excellent but with persistent cloud at around 500 metres. weather which had benefited the Salvesen At 14.30 we stopped to camp just below the Range Expedition. Trident Ridge, just by the second col from the left.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Tectonic Reconstructions of the Southernmost Andes and the Scotia Sea During the Opening of the Drake Passage
    123 Chapter 4 Tectonic reconstructions of the Southernmost Andes and the Scotia Sea during the opening of the Drake Passage Graeme Eagles Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Marine and Polar Research, Bre- merhaven, Germany e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Study of the tectonic development of the Scotia Sea region started with basic lithological and structural studies of outcrop geology in Tierra del Fuego and the Antarctic Peninsula. To 19th and early 20th cen- tury geologists, the results of these studies suggested the presence of a submerged orocline running around the margins of the Scotia Sea. Subse- quent increases in detailed knowledge about the fragmentary outcrop ge- ology from islands distributed around the margins of the Scotia Sea, and later their interpretation in light of the plate tectonic paradigm, led to large modifications in the hypothesis such that by the present day the concept of oroclinal bending in the region persists only in vestigial form. Of the early comparative lithostratigraphic work in the region, only the likenesses be- tween Jurassic—Cretaceous basin floor and fill sequences in South Geor- gia and Tierra del Fuego are regarded as strong enough to be useful in plate kinematic reconstruction by permitting the interpretation of those re- gions’ contiguity in mid-Mesozoic times. Marine and satellite geophysical data sets reveal features of the remaining, submerged, 98% of the Scotia 124 Sea region between the outcrops. These data enable a more detailed and quantitative approach to the region’s plate kinematics. In contrast to long- used interpretations of the outcrop geology, these data do not prescribe the proximity of South Georgia to Tierra del Fuego in any past period.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing UAV Monitoring of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands’ Iconic Land-Based Marine Predators
    fmars-08-654215 May 26, 2021 Time: 18:32 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 01 June 2021 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.654215 Developing UAV Monitoring of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands’ Iconic Land-Based Marine Predators John Dickens1*, Philip R. Hollyman1, Tom Hart2, Gemma V. Clucas3, Eugene J. Murphy1, Sally Poncet4, Philip N. Trathan1 and Martin A. Collins1 1 British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 3 Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States, 4 South Georgia Survey, Stanley, Falkland Islands Many remote islands present barriers to effective wildlife monitoring in terms of Edited by: challenging terrain and frequency of visits. The sub-Antarctic islands of South Georgia Wen-Cheng Wang, National Taiwan Normal University, and the South Sandwich Islands are home to globally significant populations of seabirds Taiwan and marine mammals. South Georgia hosts the largest breeding populations of Antarctic Reviewed by: fur seals, southern elephant seals and king penguins as well as significant populations of Gisele Dantas, wandering, black-browed and grey-headed albatross. The island also holds important Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Brazil populations of macaroni and gentoo penguins. The South Sandwich Islands host the Sofie Pollin, world’s largest colony of chinstrap penguins in addition to major populations of Adélie KU Leuven Research & Development, Belgium and macaroni penguins. A marine protected area was created around these islands in *Correspondence: 2012 but monitoring populations of marine predators remains a challenge, particularly John Dickens as these species breed over large areas in remote and often inaccessible locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Malvinas Y El Mundo: Registros Portuarios Históricos De Las Islas (1826-1832 Y 1842-1914)
    Malvinas y el mundo: registros portuarios históricos de las islas (1826-1832 y 1842-1914) [Sofía Clara Haller] prohistoria año XXIII, núm. 34 - dic. 2020 Prohistoria, Año XXIII, núm. 34, dic. 2020, ISSN 1851-9504 Malvinas y el mundo: registros portuarios históricos de las islas (1826-1832 y 1842-1914)* Malvinas and the World: Historical Shipping Registers of the Islands (1826- 1832 and 1842-1914) SOFÍA CLARA HALLER Resumen Abstract Los registros históricos de entradas y salidas de The historical shipping records of the Malvinas navíos de la costa malvinense permiten explorar Islands coasts allow us to explore the maritime las conexiones navieras del archipiélago entre connections that the archipelago had between 1826 y 1914. La reconstrucción de dichas 1826 and 1914. The reconstruction of such conexiones integrada con información connections, integrated with heterogeneous heterogénea proveniente de distintos information from different archives and repositorios documentales y de bases de datos databases of historical voyages, makes it de viajes históricos, hace posible visibilizar las possible to identify the activities and needs that actividades y necesidades que convocaban a los barcos a las islas Malvinas, los distintos actores brought ships to the Malvinas Islands, the que formaron parte de su historia, el cambio de different actors that were part of their history, las relaciones marítimas de las islas antes y the change in the maritime relation before and después de la ocupación británica de 1833 y las after the British occupation of 1833, and the conexiones internacionales del archipiélago con international connections of the archipelago puntos de la Patagonia continental y el estrecho with different points in continental Patagonia de Magallanes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecography E7330 Trathan, P
    Ecography E7330 Trathan, P. N., Ratcliffe, N. and Masden, E. A. 2012. Ecological drivers of change at South Georgia: the krill surplus, or climate variability. – Ecography 35: xxx– xxx. Supplementary material APPENDIX 1 AERIAL SURVEY METHODS The Royal Navy Lynx helicopter we used carried an external camera pod housing a Zeiss RMK aerial survey camera fitted with a 152-mm lens. Consecutive photographic images (240-mm frame size) overlapping by 60% were captured with either Kodak Aerochrome 2448 colour reversal film or Agfa Aviphot Pan 200 negative film. Our nominal survey height was 500 m, resulting in a photo-scale of approximately 1:3,300; a small number of flights were flown at 600 m, giving a photo-scale of approximately 1:4,010. All flights were undertaken during daylight hours when shadows were relatively short (10:30 am to 15:30 pm local time; GMT–3 hours). The survey flights were carried out during the females’ long incubation shift while male birds were away from the colony foraging at sea. At this time there was minimum penguin traffic into and out of the colony as males were away for 10–20 days (Trathan 2004). In addition, penguin traffic associated with failed breeders was much reduced as many unpaired birds had returned to sea (Williams and Croxall 1991). Thus, on the dates flown, we assumed that each bird in the colony represented a single nesting site, and each nest site represented a breeding attempt. We assumed that a count of these breeding attempts represented the breeding population size. To minimize potential disturbance to penguins during helicopter over-flights, we positioned ground observers to monitor penguin activity within selected colonies (n=6).
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Visitors to South Georgia 2016/17
    INFORMATION FOR VISITORS TO SOUTH GEORGIA 2016/17 (To be read in conjunction with the GSGSSI Biosecurity Handbook 2016) © Government of South Georgia & the South Sandwich Islands 2016 1 GSGSSI June 2016 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Applications and preparations for visits 3. Arrival arrangements 4. Shore and Harbour Facilities 5. Management and Safety of visitors 6. Code of Conduct ashore 7. Wildlife Protection Guidelines 8. Departing South Georgia Annexes 1. Tourism Management Policy (2016) 2. List of approved visitor sites 3. Visitor Biosecurity Declaration 4. Visit permit holder landing declaration 5. Private vessel observer coverage 6. Fees and Charges 7. Prohibited Areas Maps 8. Charts and Maps 2 GSGSSI June 2016 SOUTH GEORGIA INFORMATION FOR VISITORS 2016 1. Introduction & background information South Georgia & the South Sandwich Islands (SGSSI) is a United Kingdom Overseas Territory. It is administered by the Government of South Georgia & the South Sandwich Islands (GSGSSI) based in Government House in Stanley in the Falkland Islands. The Commissioner for the Territory, who is also the Governor of the Falkland Islands, is appointed by Her Majesty The Queen and has ultimate responsibility for any activities in the Territory. GSGSSI staff include 6 staff in Government House, plus three Government Officers based at King Edward Point (KEP) on South Georgia, who are responsible for the local administration on the island. This document is intended to provide a general overview of the South Georgia visit application procedures and provide information on relevant Government visitor policies. This document must be read in conjunction with the separate GSGSSI Biosecurity Handbook (2016). Following the recent habitat restoration projects targeting rats, mice and reindeer, as well as ongoing work to control invasive plants and recent outbreaks of avian disease, it is essential that all visitors rigorously implement all biosecurity measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Visitors to South Georgia 2017-18
    INFORMATION FOR VISITORS TO SOUTH GEORGIA 2017/18 (To be read in conjunction with the GSGSSI Biosecurity Handbook 2017/18) © Government of South Georgia & the South Sandwich Islands 2017 1 GSGSSI June 2017 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Applications and preparations for visits 3. Arrival arrangements 4. Shore and harBour facilities 5. Management and safety of visitors 6. Code of conduct ashore 7. Wildlife protection guidelines 8. Departing South Georgia Annexes 1. Tourism Management Policy (2017) 2. List of approved visitor sites 3. Visitor Biosecurity declaration 4. Visit permit holder landing declaration 5. Private vessel oBserver coverage 6. Fees and Charges 7. ProhiBited Areas Maps 8. Charts and Maps 9. IAATO guidelines on understanding fur seal Behaviour and advice for interactions 2 GSGSSI June 2017 INFORMATION FOR VISITORS TO SOUTH GEORGIA 2017/18 1. Introduction & background information South Georgia & the South Sandwich Islands (SGSSI) is a United Kingdom Overseas Territory. It is administered By the Government of South Georgia & the South Sandwich Islands (GSGSSI) Based in Government House in Stanley in the Falkland Islands. The Commissioner for the Territory, who is also the Governor of the Falkland Islands, is appointed By Her Majesty The Queen and has ultimate responsiBility for any activities in the Territory. GSGSSI staff include 5 staff in Government House, plus three Government Officers Based at King Edward Point (KEP) on South Georgia, who are responsiBle for the local administration on the island. This document is intended to provide a general overview of the South Georgia visit application procedures and provide information on relevant Government visitor policies. This document must Be read in conjunction with the separate GSGSSI Biosecurity HandBook 2017/18.
    [Show full text]
  • Oblique Collision in the Northeastern Caribbean from GPS Measurements and Geological Observations
    TECTONICS, VOL. 21, NO. 6, 1057, doi:10.1029/2001TC001304, 2002 Oblique collision in the northeastern Caribbean from GPS measurements and geological observations Paul Mann,1 Eric Calais,2 Jean-Claude Ruegg,3 Charles DeMets,4 Pamela E. Jansma,5 and Glen S. Mattioli6 Received 31 May 2001; revised 16 April 2002; accepted 10 June 2002; published 11 December 2002. [1] Previous Caribbean GPS studies have shown that Tectonophysics: Continental neotectonics; 8105 Tectonophysics: the rigid interior of the Caribbean plate is moving east- Continental margins and sedimentary basins; 3025 Marine Geology northeastward (070°) at a rate of 18–20 ± 3 mm/yr and Geophysics: Marine seismics (0935); 3040 Marine Geology relative to North America. This direction implies and Geophysics: Plate tectonics (8150, 8155, 8157, 8158); 7230 maximum oblique convergence between the island of Seismology: Seismicity and seismotectonics; KEYWORDS: GPS, neotectonics, Hispaniola, Puerto Rico, Bahama Platform, Hispaniola on the Caribbean plate and the 22–27-km- earthquakes. Citation: Mann, P., E. Calais, J.-C. Ruegg, C. thick crust of the Bahama carbonate platform on the DeMets, P. E. Jansma, and G. S. Mattioli, Oblique collision in the adjacent North America plate. We present a tectonic northeastern Caribbean from GPS measurements and geological interpretation of a 15-site GPS network which spans observations, Tectonics, 21(6), 1057, doi:10.1029/2001TC001304, the Hispaniola-Bahama oblique collision zone and 2002. includes stable plate interior sites on both the North America and Caribbean plates. Measurements span the time period of 1994–1999. In a North America 1. Introduction reference frame, GPS velocities in Puerto Rico, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Isla De Los Estados Su Patrimonio Natural Y Cultural
    R e s e r v a P r o v i n c i a l Isla De Los Estados Su Patrimonio Natural y Cultural Sistema Provincial de Áreas Naturales Protegidas Provincia de Tierra del Fuego Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur Provincia de Tierra del Fuego Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur Hlopec, Ricardo Reserva provincial Isla de los Estados : su patrimonio natural y cultural / Ricardo Hlopec y Nora Loekemeyer ; con colaboración de Silvia Gigli ... [et.al.]. - 1a ed. - : Secretaria de Desarrollo Sustentable y Ambiente. Dirección de Areas Protegidas y Biodiversidad. Ushuaia, 2009. 40 p. ; 30x21 cm. - (Sistema Provincial de áreas protegidas; 2) ISBN 978-950-9427-22-8 1. Recursos Naturales. 2. Reservas. 3. Conservación. I. Loekemeyer, Nora II. Gigli, Silvia, colab. III. Título CDD 333.951 6 Fecha de catalogación: 13/07/2009 © 2009 Dirección de Áreas Protegidas y Biodiversidad. Secretaría de Desarrollo Sustentable y Ambiente. Autores: Ricardo Hlopec y Nora Loekemeyer Colaboradores | Silvia Gigli (Dirección de Áreas Protegidas y Biodiversidad), Martín Vázquez (MFM), Roberto Agüero (Dirección de Catastro. Departamento Sistema Información Geográfico), Andrea Raya Rey (CADIC) y Germán Palé (FVSA). Agradecimientos | Agradecemos la colaboración prestada por los siguientes organismos y personas, sin la cual no hubiese sido posible realizar esta publicación: Dirección de Catastro y Dirección de Planeamiento Estratégico del Ministerio de Economía Museo Provincial del Fin del Mundo (MFM), Instituto Fueguino de Turismo (Infuetur), Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC), Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina (FVSA), Miguel Isla, Graciela Ortíz, Ilde Lizarralde, Marcelo Sakayan, Patricia Mosti, Adrián Schiavini, Flavio Quintana, Augusto Máspero, Fabricio Iriarte, Gustavo Valdéz, Teresa Rosas de la Fuente, Juan Carlos Rokich, Luis Bala, Mark Royo Celano, Andrés Johnson, Osvaldo Peralta, Carlos Vairo, Gustavo Aparicio y Gustavo Piaggio.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Reindeer
    Government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Reindeer Eradication Project End of Phase 2 report 1. Introduction 1.1. Background In the early twentieth century, Norwegian whalers introduced reindeer to South Georgia to act as a food source and as a reminder of home (Leader-Williams 1988). Since then, the lack of natural predators and disease has allowed the number of reindeer to increase enormously (Moen and MacAlister 1994). Scientific evidence has shown that the reindeer were having a detrimental impact on South Georgia’s native flora through trampling and overgrazing of indigenous plants, particularly coastal tussac, leading to soil erosion and increased distribution of more resistant, invasive plants (Leader-Williams et al. 1987). This has changed the structure of the vegetation and soils to the extent that many native seabirds can no longer nest there. As part of its commitment to safeguarding and restoring the native species, habitats and landscape features of South Georgia, the Government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands (GSGSSI) consulted widely on a number of reindeer management options. All but complete removal of the reindeer would result in continued ecological damage to the island and put at risk the success of the project being run by the South Georgia Heritage Trust to eradicate non-native brown rats and mice from the entire island. 1.2. Summary of Phase I The first phase of the reindeer eradication project was undertaken in the Busen area in January and February 2013. Following the recommendations of an advisory group on reindeer management methodology, and a reconnaissance trip in 2012 (Eira and Kilander 2012), the decision was taken to trial a combination of herding and ground shooting to 1 eradicate reindeer from this area.
    [Show full text]