Consolidated Plan for HOUSING and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FY2019 -2023 (HUD FY2018 - 2022) Cityof Bowie, Maryland

Cityof Bowie, Maryland

DRAFT Consolidated Plan FOR HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FY2019 -2023 (HUD FY2018 - 2022) Cityof Bowie, Maryland

Consolidated Plan FOR HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FY2019 -2023 (HUD FY2018 - 2022) The Community Development Block Grant Program July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2023

City of Bowie, Maryland

Consolidated Plan FOR HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development The Community Development Block Grant Program Julyl, 2018-June 30, 2023

Mayor: G. Fredrick Robinson Mayor Pro Tern: Henri Gardner Council: Michael Esteve, Courtney Glass, James Marcos, Isaac Trauth, Dufour Woolfley City Manager: Alfred D. Lott Office of Grant Development & Administration

City Hall: (301) 262-6200 FAX: (301) 809-2302 TDD: (301) 262-5013 WEB: www.cityofbowie.org R-XX-18 RESOLUTION

OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOWIE, MARYLAND ADOPTING A CONSOLIDATED PLAN FOR HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution R-40-02 on May 20, 2002 authorizing the City to become an Entitlement Community under the rules and regulations of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; and

WHEREAS, as an Entitlement Community the City must adopt a Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development; and

WHEREAS, as part of this Consolidated Plan, the City must conduct a Housing Needs Assessment, a Homeless Needs Assessment and a Non-Housing Community and Economic Needs Assessment; and

WHEREAS, from these assessments, the City must determine priority community needs which meet one of three national objectives, and define CDBG eligible activities which it will implement over the next five years to address the priority needs; and

WHEREAS, the City has conducted this analysis and determined that Senior Housing Rehabilitation is the community's priority need that will achieve a benefit to low and moderate income residents and presumptive low and moderate income residents of the City in the senior citizen population for FY2019 - 2023 (HUD FY2018 - 2022); and

WHEREAS, this proposed expenditure of CDBG funds is consistent with the rules and regulations proffered by HUD for the CDBG Program; and

WHEREAS, the requirements of the Citizen Participation Plan have been adhered to regarding the development of this Consolidated Plan and that a Public Comment Period of at least 30 days prior to adoption has been provided for citizen review. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Bowie does hereby approve the Consolidated Plan attached as Attachment 1 to this resolution; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to submit this plan to the Department of Housing and Community Development for their review and approval.

INTRODUCED AND PASSED by the Council of the City of Bowie. Maryland at a Regular Meeting on May 7, 2018.

Attest: THE CITY OF BOWIE, MARYLAND

Awilda Hernandez G. Frederick Robinson City Clerk Mayor

11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Community Profile

The City of Bowie receives Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the 1 US Department of Housing and Urban Development through an entitlement • The City of Bowie's Consolidated Action Plan for Housing and Community Development, Fiscal Year 2009-2013 consists of an analysis of housing, human services, and non-housing community development needs throughout the City, identify and prioritize community needs, and includes a strategy to address those needs. The Five-Year Consolidated Plan is required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for all Entitlement Communities receiving HUD funding.

The Plan is also the means to meet federal funding requirements for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The City of Bowie is a HUD Entitlement Community and as such must develop funding priorities that address at least one of three National Objectives. CDBG projects must benefit low-moderate income persons, eliminate slums and blight, or fulfill an urgent need. This program allows communities to carry out a wide range of community development activities directed toward revitalizing neighborhoods, economic development, and providing improved community facilities and services.

The City of Bowie has participated in the CDBG Program for several years. Prior to 2003, the City participated as a "sub-recipient" by requesting funds from the Prince George's County Department of Housing and Community Development for various projects. Almost all of these requests were for street improvement projects in the Huntington (Old Town Bowie) section of the City. The City spent over $2.1 million of CDBG money in Huntington on these projects during this period. According to the 2000 census, the City's population became large enough to qualify as an Entitlement Community and it was able to receive CDBG funding directly from HUD without going through the County. In its FY2003-2008 Consolidated Plan filing with HUD, the City once again established "Street Improvement Projects" in Old Town Bowie as its priority and created programs for paving streets, gutters, curbs, and sidewalks for the community. This designation directed approximately $800,000 to this project for the period FY2003 - 2008.

These projects were as follows:

• 7th Street (Maple Ave. to 330 feet west) • 3th Street (Maple Ave. to 257 feet west) • 13th Street (Chestnut Ave. to 280 feet east) • Elm Ave. (101h Street to 9th Street)

1 CDBG funds are appropri ated annually by the U.S. Congress and distributed on a fo rmula basis to local jurisdi ctions. Mun icipali ties are entitled to receive HUD funds directl y when th e City 's population exceeds 50,000 residents.

lll • Maple Ave. (9th Street to 200 feet north) • Park Ave. • Elm Ave. (1 oth Street to 11th Street) • 1oth Street • Myrtle Ave. • Brady Ave. (9th Street to AMTRAK Station) • 5th Street (FY09)

For the FY2009 - 2013 and FY2014 -2018 Consolidated Plan periods, the City implemented the "Senior Citizen "Green" Housing Rehab Program". Through an investment of approximately $2 million CDBG dollars and over $300,000 in state and other funds (plus City-funded program administrative costs), the City assisted over 200 homeowners in the rehab of their homes. These upgrades/improvements have led to significantly reduced energy bills and enhanced livability and comfort in their existing environments, while providing additional disposal income for much needed medical and food costs.

lV C I TY OF BOWIE OFFICE OF GRANT DEVELOPMEN T AN D ADM INISTRATIO N

Allllmila 0. De: fail 4. 2014

Grlllt ...... lllllletlbJtllt U.S. .,...... , ...... IMliln D9t 1lap 111 (II.ID).

JIit ...... HUD's ...... &llltlr .. Q ...... _

....., ..... • 62 years of a~ or older • Roofing ...... n11 tD tllllrllames 2) ...... coats • Legj:11 owner at 'property' wthin City limits • Siding

3) ...... • Ha-ve a hoU5ehokl income mit at or below • Insulation ') llnlJlll'l lndoar • ....., thefollmmg; 5) ...... ,. • Wmtaws;'Doors FamlY Size bJgxnrUmil • HVAC Systems 1w t111 llf1J>liultitn, ,,, .,,,, 1 Person $57,960 • Energy Star Appliances ~ llllllllCt: 2 Persons $66,240 CITY OP BOWIE • Mobility lnstal tions OPPICE or GllANT Jflersons $74,520 DEVELOPUEMT AND • Electric81 UP{l1ades ADMJNJST&ATION The maumm grant fi.nl~ per household is $10,000_ Prior jfflnt recipienls are ineligil]le • Plumbing repairs ...... to apply_ ...... -aot ...... Jf\ a : ..

V CDBG Consolidated Planning Process

All CDBG programs must be meet at least one of the following HUD National Objectives:

• Benefit Low/Mod Income persons, • Prevent or Eliminate Slums and Blight, or • Meet an urgent need

Any projects and/or activities designed to meet these National Objectives must also conform to the requisite regulations and statutes governing "eligibility". The City of Bowie, as well as the majority of all "Entitlement Communities" adopt the "Low/Mod" National Objective because all housing programs fall under this category and it is the least restrictive on qualifying recipients and project administration, oversight, and cost. The Low/Mod designation carries the overarching HUD/CDBG requirement that programs must use 70% of its funds for this population and 51 % of any designated area/community must be Low/Mod. The options provided under Low/Mod include

• Area Benefit • Limited Clientele • Housing • Jobs

In order to determine the types of projects an Entitlement Community will submit to HUD for funding under the CDBG Program, HUD requires that the Entitlement Community must, at a minimum, do the following:

Develop a Citizen Participation Plan Conduct a Community Needs Assessment Assess current demographic conditions Analyze changes in demographic conditions Develop municipal priorities

The City developed a planning process to achieve these objectives (See Appendix A). On February 20, 2018, the City Council approved the FY19-23 Citizen Participation Plan (See Appendix B). This document detailed the approach to solicit citizen input. In January 2018, the City distributed over 6,200 "Community Needs" survey forms (See Appendix C) to 30% of the households in the City and to the business community through the Bowie Spotlight, the Bowie Chamber of Commerce, and to Homeowner Associations, faith-based institutions, and local schools. The survey instrument was also available for completion online on the City's website. The survey requested that respondents rank their responses by "High Need", "Moderate Need", "Low Need", or "No Need". The response level was very good and the survey results (See Appendix D) produced the following "High Need/Moderate Need" issues:

Vl Housing Needs

Energy Conservation/Efficiency Education 71 % Major Home Improvement Assistance 64% Emergency Assistance ( emergency repairs, prevention of utility costs) 64%

Communities Facilities Improvements

Youth Centers 76% Parks & Recreation Facilities 75% Senior Center 73%

Community Services

Crime Awareness/Prevention 88% Medical Services 82% Senior Services 81% Youth Services 81%

Infrastructure and Public improvements

Street Improvements 83% Streetlights 79% Sidewalks 77%

Economic Development

Job Training and Job Placement Services 71% Rehab of Older Commercial Buildings 70% Loans to Business 62%

Vll Homeless Facilities and Services

Emergency Food & Clothing 71 % Employment Training for the Homeless 70% Substance Abuse Treatment 68%

The City also retained a consultant, Mullin & Lonergan, a nationally recognized firm in the areas of housing market analysis and HUD Consolidated Planning development & consulting, to update census data for the City and to provide an analysis of the City's demographics, housing conditions & needs, and housing market analysis. This included comparisons with the County and the State consistent with HUD'S requirements for the Consolidated Plan. A significant finding and assessment of the report is the following:

NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment Summary of Housing Needs

High housing costs reduce economic opportunities and access to prosperity, especially among lower-income households in the City of Bowie. Real incomes in the area have declined while housing costs have risen, resulting in an increase in the need for affordable housing options. Between 2000 and 2013, the median income for City residents has increased by 2.2% after adjusting for inflation, while median contract rent increased by 20.7% and median home values increased by 41.8%. This means that housing costs take up a relatively larger share of income for households compared to 2000. Rising median home values translate to diminished buying power for households that want to reside in the City. Given a lack of decent, affordable housing options, the City's lower income households often face a choice between deficient housing and cost burden.

The growth of the elderly population in Bowie means the need for elderly services will continue to increase. Conversely, the shrinking of the middle-age population may be a result of the lack of affordable housing options for younger families. The fastest decrease in population occurred in the age group 25-44, a prime household formation and home purchase cohort, indicating that many young families may be unable to find adequate, affordable housing within the City .

. . .. the most significant housing issue identified is cost burden, defined as spending over 30% of gross household income on housing costs, such as mortgage or rent payments, utilities, insurance and taxes.

In Bowie, 44% of households are cost burdened, while 18.7% of households are severely cost burdened. The higher cost burden for residents shows a more challenging environment

Vlll to find and maintain affordable housing, especially among elderly households on fixed mcomes.

In general, households comprised of small related households (a household of 2 to 4 persons which includes at least one person related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption) have more difficulty in affording housing costs than other types of households. Elderly renter households are the most cost-burdened, while small related households are the most cost-burdened among homeowners.

What are the most common housing problems?

As shown in analysis, the most common housing problem in Bowie is housing cost burden as evidenced by the City's high contract rents and high home values. A greater number of owner-occupied homes are cost burdened than renter-occupied homes.

In addition to cost burden, a high number of households (2,010) were experiencing at least one type of housing problem, including overcrowding, lack of kitchen facilities and/or lack of bathroom facilities. These information most likely results from larger families or several people sharing a housing unit in order to afford rent in Bowie.

The following illustrates some of the current conditions and trends in the housing stock in the City:

lX Otyoflla

Introduction

The City has initiated 1he plaming process for its 2019-2023 Ccxtsolidated Plan, a doaiment required by HUD every fi!te ye.ss. Thefollow--cis a .sunwnary ofsevenl key trends noted in thepreliminarydatil collection and analysis. (Note: 2009-2013 OiA'> Data is the most IDTI!lltly available from 1-«J 0.)

Trends in Households with Housing Problems

The number of .liJwel" ~ hausebolds in Bowie ltas inCll'CIHld. Spedially, the numbs Df households wilh inoomes between ll).8(J'lli of HUO's Ale.I Mediian famiy Income (HAMA) have inaeased by almost 800.

Households by Income Band

XDl

1500

1111D

5DO 0 I I I ,,Z.10III' ~ >30-50V II "~ • 2III09 • 2013

Housing pmlJlems among renter baus6JOlds andr Ma:JID5 l.f' ID Bmr ofHAMFI bow decuased IWIPJVII. The g,reatl!St dedine OCIUTl!d allllXIC extremely low-inalme houslE!holds followed by modeRte-inrome households. However, housing pn1blems among rent«s between 80-1009' HAMfl increased. (Housing protilems inckllle cost burden, overuowlfing. and incomplete titmen/plurm~ fadlilil!s..)

Renter Households with One or More Housing Problems

:J.50 3CIO 250

~ l!iO 100 50 0 I II 11 . • • 2009 a 2oa

X Cit'/ u1Bc·... "'

BY CJJmparisan, /tctus.lng ~ among owner ~11~holds, nas lnt:~a2d among fowr:r In~~ groupJ. O.,eral~ hOMeOWfleri rem1ln f;,r n,,o,e likely to e:Kpe,lence one or more hOU$ln11 prob'ems ilm ply be~ U$e owr,er~ °"" i\um ber renteri (1,24.S ta 515) In Bowle. Specifically, housing problems were highest amon11 households between 0-SO" liAMFI, equnralent ton l!arty ~00 more households in 2013.

Owner Households with One or More Housing Problems 600 ~o.,

400 ]00

200

100 0 11 IOY.1~ I~10.~ >5.1-Bll'lt ~1~ a .!009 • io:u

Cast bunlen, b-f Jar~ mast prtr,a/4lnt lrouJing prol>lfflt MIMIJ rr" houulwld, ond Income ,rqr.ip.s. d«~ed OfflQ"I rent~r IKN5e~ltl.s ..~ ini:ontt$ i,p to SQ" H,U/111, ~t lm:reased amo~ nm~ ltous.ellolm betwttn 5°"°". Cart bu~n ~ defined as p.,yl!II more t h.-n 30% of Income on housinf! costs.

Cost-burdened Renter Households

450 400 35() 300 1~0 700 150 100 50 0 I o.:l~"I >3t>-~ -..50-10'.tl a 2009 • 2013

Xl Most IKJCt:ibfr of 01 #lown'rr, co I flffl IKrff H 2013, then wtre 2,16~ cost-bvrdened lo r lll(Qme ho~ comp red to803 tost r 1n<0,rw rente~. The ll<)t~ JMte.1sl!!'w.u hts~t .:ima~ elder'r hoU!.ehold!.1•174} :snd ~u r(!bted hou~l!llold!. t+320}.

Cost-burd , e-0 Owner ouseholds 1000

l!J(J()

600

400

200

Q I.ll.W I;,]0-50llo I,60,90" a i009 0'13

Xll Homelessness and Support Services

The levels of homelessness in the City remains relatively low, however, current mortgage foreclosures and other issues are exerting exceptional strains on household budgets. The City continues to meet and work with churches, community groups, and other care providers to assess the extent of this problem and to create solutions. Prince George's County does assess County homelessness needs regularly, and concentrates its services in more urbanized communities where the need for such services proves to be consistently higher. The City does not have a Housing Authority or Social Service division that tracts homelessness in Bowie, and census data does not include such data specific to Bowie. Presently, the local service providers do not have the capacity to efficiently or uniformly tract client information, but the City's Office of Grant Development & Administration works closely with County agencies to address homelessness issues within the City.

The Homeless Services Partnership (HSP) implements the objectives of the Prince George's County Continuum of Care Strategy. The Partnership, a coalition of human service providers, meets monthly to educate the public, evaluate client needs, plan and review strategies, define specific roles and responsibilities of partners and collaboratively establish timelines for implementation of strategies. The City, through the Office of Grant Development & Administration, participates in this partnership.

The Prince George's County Department of Human Services implemented the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) in fiscal year 2003. The system allows service providers to capture unduplicated case management information that will in tum provide a count of homeless individuals. The Bowman Internet System Service Point was selected to allow participating service providers to input information using a web browser, generate customized reports, ensure privacy to protect customer confidentiality, and track services, referral history and gaps in service. The software coordinates data collected by service providers working with homeless persons. It is designed to prevent the duplicate input of client information. Software and training sessions are available for members of the Partnership.

Xlll The Bowie Interfaith Pantry and Emergency Aid Fund provides food and financial assistance to clients. The Client Intact Information indicates the following activity for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017.

Total Client Visits 4,410 Total Clients (families) served 707 (includes 2,940 children)

Race (of head of household)

African American 2,118

Caucasian 657

Mixed race 65

Hispanic 454

Asian 183

Unknown 20

Residence Status

Homeless 33

Male 753

Female 2787

Assistance Provided:

Food Assistance $336,990 Financial Assistance $26,558

XIV Municipal public services address the health and safety concerns of citizens, particularly those with low income and vulnerable populations. Resources are focused on special needs populations that include the elderly and frail elderly, persons with disabilities, and youth and families. Services reflect community needs that include literacy training, health, transportation, crime awareness, employment training, and youth services. Emergency housing services within the City include St. Matthews Housing Corporation, which provides 18 transitional beds. The Volunteers of America has 24 Alternative Living Facilities (ALF) in Bowie that provide housing and services for chronically mentally ill persons. These are the only facilities located in the City that assists persons who are not homeless but who require supportive housing. Staff from the City's Youth Services Bureau also provide family, group, and individual counseling; information and referrals; informal counseling, crisis intervention and suicide intervention services. The Youth Services Bureau sponsors 14 alcohol and drug free programs during the year.

Several Bowie faith-based congregations provide overnight shelter, case management and meals for approximately 50 homeless persons each night during the winter months. The Bowie Emergency Aid Fund (it receives funding assistance from, but is not operated by, the City of Bowie) receives inquiries and referrals, interviews clients, and provides cash assistance. The County operates the Emergency Food Assistance Program to distribute Federal surplus foods to emergency food pantries and needy households. Bowie's Ascension Catholic Church coordinates food distribution in the City. Through the District of Columbia Emergency Food Program, emergency food providers purchase food for needy individuals and families. Attempts are underway to shift the program to the Maryland Emergency Food Program; Prince George's and Montgomery Counties are the only counties in the State that are not allowed to use this program.

The City continues its relationship with the Bowie Emergency Aid Fund and Community Food Pantry to better coordinate with County services available to City residents and to acquire client intake software that will provide the City, as well as the County, with realistic figures on homelessness in Bowie. The City of Bowie, through this partnership, will participate in the implementation of Prince George's County Continuum of Care strategy.

The City's Bureau of Youth and Family Services also provides limited assistance and counseling to residents. A full report on the nature and volume of these services is available for review at City Hall, Bureau of Youth and Family Services; "Annual Report FY 2007, Youth Services Bureau, Bowie Youth and Family Services".

xv City Council Approved Programs for the FY19-23 Consolidated Plan

On April 2, 2018, City Council adopted the findings of the surveys, public hearings, community outreach meetings, and the preliminary results of the demographic data and analysis, and approved Resolution R-17-18. This resolution directed staff to design programs to accommodate the CDBG Entitlement funds the City receives from HUD for the new Consolidated Plan for the period July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2023 to provide certain housing rehabilitation services for the homeowners and to design and implement employment training and orientation programs (funds permitting) consistent with HUD'S regulations and statutes.

Strategic Plan for Community Development

The goal of all Bowie community development activities is to enhance the living environment and expand economic opportunities for residents. The City of Bowie has embarked on a comprehensive plan for economic development, community stabilization, and an enhanced quality of life for residents throughout the City. The goals for populations are consistent with HUD 'S policies and as well as its goals for the Energy Star Program as follows:

1. Removing constraints on mobility 2. Reducing total household expenses 3. Improving indoor air quality 4. Reducing health hazards 5. Increasing comfort 6. Increasing property value 7. Improving outlook on life

In implementing this plan, in the City has accepted grant funds in the past from OpenDoor Housing Fund (ODHF) of Silver Spring, Maryland, and the MD Department of Housing and Community Development (Community Legacy Fund) to add "Energy Efficiency" and "Green" technologies to the housing rehabilitation program for senior citizens. ODHF is a private investment fund (a merger of a fund created by the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments and a fund created by the Universalist Church). We propose to incorporate, to the extent practical, energy efficient, renewable resources in each housing rehab project as we proceed to

1. Replace old and poorly maintained HV AC systems 2. Repair structural damage, leaks, and decay 3. Eliminate insufficient and poorly installed insulation 4. Correct leaky and poorly installed ducts 5. Replace inefficient and/or leaky windows and doors 6. Provide new roofs

XVl 7. Renovate bathrooms to provide access for indigent and handicapped semors 8. Accommodate other eligible rehab activities

Given the nature of the changing demographics and growth in Bowie, especially the senior population, the City intends to prioritize the senior citizen population, the disabled, and other groups, in the allocation of CDBG Entitlement funding on housing rehabilitation services throughout the City over the next five years. The current citywide approach to providing a much-needed service for our most vulnerable populations reflects City management's decision to petition the City Council to implement a housing rehab program for all residents (income restrictions apply) and to create a workforce training and orientation program for the youth and young adult population throughout the City.

The Five Year Action Strategy consists of approximately $1 ,000,000 worth of housing rehabilitation services and workforce training programs. CDBG project activities will consist of

1. A formal application and intake process 2. Detailed program specifications 3. Program qualifications 4. Selection standards and guidelines 5. List oflicensed contractors 6. Program "Contracts" for participants 7. Program rules and regulations 8. Project monitoring 9. Contract closeout procedures

The City's plan for Employment Training & Orientation will follow the guidelines under CDBG Public Service activities. The applicable regulatory/statutory citations are Section 105 (a) (8), 570.201 (e), 570.207. The City has experience with this type of program based on its creation and implementation of a program in 2017. The City trained youth and young adults over a six-week period. The classes were separated by age group and convened two nights per week in a local County-run community recreation center. Each graduate was given a job opportunity through the County's summer youth job employment program, or with local businesses (depending on age). This program was the result of several community emergencies and collaborations coming out a murder, retaliatory shootings, and resultant family homelessness in a community in the City.

XVll xvm I. FIVE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN

Summary

Based upon data and analysis provided by Mullin & Lonergan, survey results from City residents, businesses, HOA(s), and other constituents, plus comments from community outreach meetings and public hearings, the City has decided to implement two new programs for FY2019 - 2023 (HUD FY2018 - 2022):

Given the level of funding, the types of eligible activities under the CDBG program, and the need to maximize the number of individuals/families assisted in the program, staff proposes the following for program and income eligible City of Bowie applicants:

Year 1 (FY 2019)

Design and Implement a Residential, Owner-Occupied, Single Family Housing Rehab Program. Prioritize Senior Citizens, Disabled, Veterans, Public Safety & Law Enforcement, and Teachers.

Design and Implement a "Workforce Training Program" for at-risk Youth andYoung Adults. Ages 18-30 ( contingent upon funding availability).

Year 2 (FY 2020)

Continue the programs from FY 2019.

Year 3 (FY 2021)

Staff prepares recommendations for City management and Council on additional needs and program implementation strategies, if needed. If not, continue programs from FY2020.

Year 4 (FY 2022)

Continue Year 3 programs, unless additional needs arise where eligible activities can assist eligible participants.

Year 5 (FY 2023)

Continue Year 4 programs, unless additional needs arise where eligible activities can assist eligible participants.

1 Time Period

The City of Bowie intends to implement activities outlined in this Consolidated Plan between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2023.

2 A. HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT

The City of Bowie commissioned a study of the housing characteristics and demographic data for the City. Mullin & Lonergan, LLC, a well-known national housing and Consolidated Planning consultant, conducted this study and analysis. The results are as follows:

3 MARCH 22, 2018 DRAFli

Consolidated Plan For Housing and Community Development 2019-2023

Prepared for City of Bowie Prepared by

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 1 II 0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Table of Contents

Needs Assessment ...... 3 NA-OS Overview ...... 3 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment ...... 5 NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems ...... 14 NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems ...... 17 NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens ...... 20 NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion ...... 21 NA-35 Public Housing ...... 27 NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment ...... 31 NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment ...... 34 NA-SO Non-Housing Community Development Needs ...... 37

Housing Market Analysis ...... 38 MA-OS Overview ...... 38 MA-10 Number of Housing Units ...... 39 MA-15 Cost of Housing ...... 41 MA-20 Condition of Housing ...... 45 MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing ...... 48 MA-30 Homeless Facilities ...... 50 MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services ...... 52 MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing ...... 54 MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets ...... 55 MA-SO Needs and Market Analysis Discussion ...... 60

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 2

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp . 06/30/2018) Needs Assessment

NA-OS Overview Needs Assessment Overview

The housing needs assessment is based on an analysis of housing problems by income level, tenure, and households with special needs.

Data in this section was drawn primarily from HU D's Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data set, which is a special tabulation of 2009-2013 American Community Survey (ACS) data from the Census Bureau. The 2009-2013 ACS CHAS data is the latest available data from HUD. The CHAS data describes housing problems, such as overcrowding or incomplete kitchen and/or plumbing facilities, as well as cost burden, which occurs when a household pays more than 30% of gross income on housing costs. Extreme cost burden occurs when a household pays more than 50% of gross income on housing costs.

Supplemental data was drawn from the 2009-2013 ACS 5-Year Estimates and other sources to provide additional context when needed. Disability statistics were unavailable at the 5-year estimate level and were instead drawn from the 2011-2013 ACS 3-Year Estimates. In addition, where possible, 2012-2016 ACS 5-Year Estimates were used to provide greater data clarity.

Based on the data and analysis included within this section, the following conclusions relative to housing needs in the City of Bowie for all household types, income groups and racial/ethnic groups can be made:

• Among renter households, elderly households had the highest level of cost burden (i.e., housing costs between 30% and 50% of household income)

• Among owner households, small related households had the highest level of cost burden (i.e., housing costs between 30% and 50% of household income).

Racial/ethnic groups with disproportionately greater housing problems include the following:

Housing Problems

• All Black households with incomes up to 100% of AMI

• Asian households with incomes at 0-30% and 81-100% of AMI

• American Indian/Alaska Native households with incomes at 81-100% of AMI (small sample size)

• Pacific Islander households with incomes at 0-30% of AMI, and

• Hispanic households at 51-80% and 81-100% of AMI

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 3

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Severe housing problems were noted among the following:

• Black households with incomes at 0-30% of AMI

• Asian households with incomes at 81-100% of AMI

• American Indian/Alaska Native households with incomes at 31--50% of AMI (small sample size}, and

• Hispanic households at 0-30% and 31-50% of AMI

Racial/ethnic groups with a disproportionately greater housing cost burden include the following:

• American Indian/Alaska Native households with housing cost burdens between 30-50%, and

• Hispanic households with household cost burdens above 50%

Within the context of these needs, data shows that Bowie will continue to grow in population, while the age of residents will increase. Senior housing and affordable housing will continue to be a problem, and services for seniors will need to grow to meet future need.

The following analysis will highlight these and other points relevant to Bowie. When reviewing this document, it is noteworthy that much of the analysis is based on 2000 data provided by HUD, specifically the HUD provided 2009-2013 CHAS data. Although the dataset is labeled 2009-2013, it is based on data collected in 2000. HUD requires the use and incorporation ofthe 2009-2013 CHAS dataset.

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 4

0MB Control No: 2506-011 7 (exp. 06/30/2018) NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment

Summary of Housing Needs

High housing costs reduce economic opportunities and access to prosperity, especially among lower income households in the City of Bowie. Real incomes in the area have declined while housing costs have risen, resulting in an increase in the need for affordable housing options. Between 2000 and 2013, the median income for City residents has increased by 2.2% after adjusting for inflation, while median contract rent increased by 20.7% and median home values increased by 41.8%. This means that housing costs take up a relatively larger share of income for households compared to 2000. Rising median home values translate to diminished buying power for households that want to reside in the City. Given a lack of decent, affordable housing options, the City's lower-income households often face a choice between deficient housing and cost burden.

Table 1 Housing Needs Assessment Demographics Demographics Base Yea r: 2000 Most Recent Year: 2013 % Cha nge Population 50,269 55,585 11% Households 18,718 19,466 4% Median $76,778.00 $107,012.00 39% Income {$104, 742 in 2013 dollars) (2.2% adjusted for inflation)

Data Source : 2000 Census (Base Yea r), 2009-2013 ACS (Most Recent Yea r;); BLS CPI Inflation Calculator

Table 2 Housing Costs Table {SUPPLEMENTAL) Base Year: 2000 Most Recent Year: 2013 % Change

Median Home Value $157,800 $305,300 +93% ($21 5,274 in 201 3 dollars) (41.8% adjusted) Median Contract Rent $946 $1 ,558 +65% (1,291-in 2013 dollars) (20.7% adjusted) Data Source : 2000 Census (Base Year), 2009-2013 ACS (M ost Rece nt Yea r)

Demographic indicators are essential to understanding a community's housing needs. In Bowie, the continued growth of elderly households has necessitated increased elderly services in the City; however, other populations, while not growing as quickly, comprise larger portions of the City' s population.

The growth of the elderly population in Bowie means the need for elderly services will continue to increase. Conversely, the shrinking of the middle-age population may be a result of the lack of affordable housing options for younger families. The fastest decrease in population occurred in the age group 25 -44, a prime household formation and home purchase cohort, indicating that many young families may be unable to find adequate, affordable housing within the City.

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 5

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Table 3 Population Change by Age Age Group 2000 2016 '00-'16 % Population Population Change Age 0-4 3,782 3,529 -6.7% Age 5-14 7,787 7,007 -10.0% Age 15-24 4,850 7,368 51.9% Age 25-34 7,283 6,259 -14.1% Age 35-44 10,282 8,323 -19 .1% Age 45-54 6,952 10,287 48.0% Age 55 - 64 4,627 7,203 55 .7% Age 65-74 2,842 4,283 50.7% Age 75-84 1,435 2,318 61.5% Age 85 and over 429 1,056 146.2% Total 50,269 57,633 14.6%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census {P-12} and 2012-2016 ACS {801001}

As the data below show, the most significant housing issue identified is cost burden, defined as spending over 30% of gross household income on housing costs, such as mortgage or rent payments, utilities, insurance and taxes.

In Bowie, 44% of households are cost burdened, while 18.7% of households are severely cost burdened. The higher cost burden for residents shows a more challenging environment to find and maintain affordable housing, especially among elderly households on fixed incomes.

Households by Household Type: Housing Problems (all)

Renter households:

• Between 0-30% of AMI and severely overcrowded with >1.5 people per room

• Between 30-50% of AMI paying more than 50% of gross income on housing costs

Owner households:

• Between 30-50% of AMI with housing problems paying more than 50% of gross income on housing costs

• Between 30-50% of AMI with one or more of four housing problems

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 6

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (e xp. 06/30/2018) Households by Household Type: Cost Burden

Paying more than 30% of gross income on housing costs:

Renter households:

• Large related households between 50-80% of AMI

• Elderly households between 30-50% of AMI

• Other households between 30-50% of AMI

Owner households:

• Small related households between 30-50% of AMI

• Elderly households between 0-30% of AMI

• Other households between 0-30% of AMI

Paying more than 50% of gross income on housing costs:

Renter households:

• Large related households between 0-30% of AMI

• Other households between 30-50% of AMI

• Elderly households between 0-30% anq 30-50% of AMI

Owner households:

• Small related households between 30-50% of AMI

• Elderly households between 0-30% of AMI

• Other households between 0-30% of AMI

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 7

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) The following are HUD-generated tables using 2009-2013 CHAS data. HAMFI refers to "HUD Adjusted Median Family Income," which is the median family income calculated by HUD for each jurisdiction, in order to determine Fair Market Rents and income limits for HUD programs. HAMFI will not necessarily be the same as other calculations of median incomes such as a simple Census number due to a series of adjustments that are made.

Table 4 Number of Households 0-30% >30-50% >50-80% >80-100% >100% HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI Total Households 1,085 1,565 1,235 1,440 14,140 Small Family Households 185 570 450 575 7,920 Large Family Households 110 180 235 195 1,405 Household contains at least one person 62-74 years of age 240 394 205 420 2,385 Household contains at least one person age 75 or older 265 310 164 180 945 Households with one or more children 6 years old or younger 155 215 235 245 1,310 Source: 2009-2013 CHAS * this data is >80% HAMFI. Information provided from HUD and presented as-is. Totals do not necessarily match.

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 8

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (e xp. 06/30/2018) Table 5 Housing Problems

0-30% >30-50% >50-80% >80- Total 0-30% >30-50% >50-80% >80- Total AMI AMI AMI 100% AMI AMI AMI 100% AMI AMI Substandard Housing - lacking complete plumbing or kitchen facilities 10 15 10 45 80 0 0 0 0 0 Severely Overcrowded - With >1.51 people per room (and complete kitchen and plumbing) 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 4 0 4 Overcrowded - With 1.01-1.5 people per room (and none of the above problems) 0 0 10 0 10 0 20 14 30 64 Housing cost burden greater than 50% of income (and none of the above problems) 210 215 35 0 460 530 535 140 175 1,380 Housing cost burden greater than 30% of income (and none of the above problems) 10 115 190 115 430 140 365 435 490 1,430 Zero/negative Income (and none of the above problems) so 0 0 0 so 15 0 0 0 15 Source: 2009-2013 CHAS Information provided from HUD and presented as-is. Totals do not necessarily match.

Table 6 Housing Problems

0- >30- >50- >80- Total 0- >30- >50- >80- Total 30% 50% 80% 100% 30% 50% 80% 100% AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI 230 230 55 45 560 530 555 160 205 1,450 Having none of four housing problems so 170 280 230 730 210 610 740 960 2,520 Household has negative income, but none of the other housing problems so 0 0 0 50 15 0 0 0 15 Source: 2009-2013 CHAS Information provided from HUD and presented as-is. Toto/s do not necessorily motch.

Consolidated Pl an BOWIE 9

0MB Control No : 2506-0117 (exp. 06/ 30/2018) Table 7 Cost Burden > 30%

0-30% >30-50% >50-80% Total 0-30% >30-50% >50-80% Total 0-30% >30-50% AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI Small Related 30 44 65 139 150 475 265 890 30 44 Large Related 55 65 85 205 55 110 125 290 55 65 Elderly 90 154 10 254 295 235 107 637 90 154 Other 60 80 65 205 159 110 79 348 60 80 Total need by income 235 343 225 803 659 930 576 2,165 235 343 Source: 2009-2013 CHAS Data

Tables Cost Burden > 50%

0-30% >30-50% >50-80% Total 0-30% >30-50% >50-80% Total 0-30% >30-50% AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI 30 34 20 84 150 335 70 555 30 34 Large Related 55 so 0 105 55 60 0 115 55 so Elderly 90 90 0 180 195 90 4 289 90 90 Other so 55 15 120 130 55 65 250 so 55 Total need by income 225 229 35 489 530 540 139 1,209 225 229 Source: 2009-2013 CHAS Data

Table9 Crowding Information

0-30% >30-50% >50-80% >80- Total 0-30% >30-50% >50-80% >80- Total AMI AMI AMI 100% AMI AMI AMI 100% AMI AMI 10 0 10 0 20 0 20 14 25 59 Multiple, unrelated family households 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 8 Other, non-family households 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total need by income 40 0 0 0 40 0 so 0 0 so Source: 2009-2013 CHAS Data

Consolidated Pl an BOWIE 10

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/ 30/ 2018) Describe the number and type of single person households in need of housing assistance.

According to ACS data, over 25% of all householders in the City of Bowie are living alone, of which almost a third (29.2%) have incomes below the poverty level. This group would be the most in need of housing assistance.

Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking.

Disabled Residents

In 2016, 5,343 residents, or 9.3% of the population, reported a disability. Across the City, 10.7% of persons with a disability also live in poverty compared to 2.5% without a disability who live in poverty. These figures underscore the struggle that many City households have that include a person with a disability experience in finding and maintaining suitable affordable housing.

Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking

There is no City data available on the number of persons who are victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking.

What are the most common housing problems?

As shown in Table 5, the most common housing problem in Bowie is housing cost burden as evidenced by the City's high contract rents and high home values. A greater number of owner-occupied homes are cost burdened than renter-occupied homes.

In addition to cost burden, a high number of households (2,010) were experiencing at least one type of housing problem, including overcrowding, lack of kitchen facilities and/or lack of bathroom facilities. This information is shown in Table 6. Most likely, this results from larger families or several people sharing a housing unit in order to afford rent in Bowie.

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 11

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) As shown on the following map, cost burden is generally more prevalent in the central and southern areas of the City of Bowie.

Map Legend X

Housing Cost Burden HAMFI

<20% Paying>30%

20-40% Paying>30%

40-60% Paying>30o/o

60-80% Pay1ng>30o/o

>80% Paying>30o/o

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 12

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (ex p. 06/ 30/2018) Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems?

On a percentage basis, elderly renters were the most likely to experience cost burden >30%.

In addition, small owner households and elderly owner households had cost burden rates of 30% or higher. Similar trends were noted among households with cost burden >50% with small owners (45 .9%) experiencing rates of 30% or higher. This information is shown in Tables 7 and 8.

Describe the characteristics and needs of Low-income individuals and families with children (especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)). Also discuss the needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re-housing assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance

TBD

If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at-risk population(s), it should also include a description of the operational definition of the at-risk group and the methodology used to generate the estimates:

Bowie does not provide estimates of its at-risk populations.

Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness

TBD

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 13

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 {exp. 06/ 30/ 2018) NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems

HUD defines a disproportionately greater housing need when a racial or ethnic group experiences housing problems at a rate greater than 10% more than for the income level as a whole. The 2009-2013 CHAS data table below summarizes the percentage of each racial/ethnic group experiencing housing problems by HUD Adjusted Median Family Income (AMI) levels. Housing problems include:

• Housing units lacking complete kitchen facilities and/or complete plumbing facilities

• Overcrowding (more than one person per room)

• Cost burden greater than 30%

Income classifications are as follows: 0%-30% AMI is considered extremely low-income, 31%-50% AMI is low-income, 51%-80% AMI is moderate-income, and 81%-100% is middle-income.

Based on this definition, the following household types experienced disproportionately greater housing need in Bowie:

• All Black households with incomes up to 100% of AMI

• Asian households with incomes at 0-30% and 81-100% of AMI

• American Indian/Alaska Native households with incomes at 81-100% of AMI (small sample size)

• Pacific Islander households with incomes at 0-30% of AMI, and

• Hispanic households at 51-80% and 81-100% of AMI

This information is summarized in the following table based on the HUD-generated tables in the subsequent pages.

Table 10 Summary Table: Population with One or More Housing Problems

White 85.2% 66.7% 65.5% 47.6% Black/ African Arrerican 100.0% 90.7% II 86.3% 70.8% Asian 100.0% 0.0% 77.8% 100.0% Arrerican Indian , Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Pacific Islander 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hspanic 86.7% 75.0% 100.0% II 100.0% Jurisdiction as a Whole 90.6% 76.1% 76.4% 60.5%

Source: CHAS 2009-2013

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 14

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (e xp. 06/30/2018) The following tables break down each income segment by racial/e thnic category and the number of housing problems and are HUD-generated tables using 2009-2013 CHAS data.

Table 11 0%-30% of Area Median Income, by Housing Problem s and Race/Ethnicity Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the four Household has no/negative four housing housing pro blems income, but none of the problems other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 905 110 65 White 335 75 15 Black/ African American 465 29 40 Asian 0 0 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 95 4 0

Source: 2009-2013 CHAS

Table 12 31%-50% of Area Median Income, by Housing Proble ms and Race/Ethnicity Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the four Household has no/negative four housing housing pro blems income, but none of the problems other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 1,265 300 0 White 565 170 0 Black/ African American 465 90 0 Asian 55 0 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 10 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 134 34 0

Source: 2009-2013 CHAS

Table 13 51%-80% of Area Median Income, by Housing Proble ms and Race/Ethnicity Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the four Household has no/negative four housing housing pro blems income, but none of the problems other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 840 395 0 White 240 235 0 Black/ African American 495 120 0 Asian 10 19 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 105 15 0 Source: 2009-2013 CHAS

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 15

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Table 14 81%-100% of Area Median Income, by Housing Proble ms and Race/Ethnicity Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none oft he four Household has no/negative four housing housing prob lems income, but none of the problems other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 855 590 0 White 275 385 0 Black/ African American 450 165 0 Asian 20 0 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 30 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 20 35 0

Source: 2009-2013 CHAS

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 16

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems

HUD defines a disproportionately severe housing need when a racial/ethnic group experiences severe housing problems at a rate greater than 10% more than for the income level as a whole. The distinction between housing problems and severe housing problems is the degree of cost burden and overcrowding. Severe housing problems include:

• Housing units lacking complete kitchen facilities and/or complete plumbing facilities

• Overcrowding (more than 1.5 person per room)

• Cost burden greater than 50%

Income classifications are as follows: 0-30% AMFI is considered extremely low-income, 31-50% AMFI is low-income, 51-80% AMFI is moderate-income, and 81-100% AMFI is middle-income.

Based on this definition, the following household types experienced disproportionately greater housing need in Bowie:

• Black households with incomes at 0-30% of AMI

• Asian households with incomes at 81-100% of AMI

• American Indian/Alaska Native households with incomes at 31--50% of AMI (small sample size), and

• Hispanic households at 0-30% and 31-50% of AMI

This information is summarized in the table based on the HUD-generated tables in the subsequent pages.

Table 15 Summary Table: Severe Housing Problems by Race

- more severe housing problems White 51 .2% 46.9% 10.6% 13.6% Black/ African American 89.8% 50.9% 22.8% 19.2%

Asia n 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% American Indian, Alaska Native 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Pa cific Is lander 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 96.0% 70 .8% 8.3% 0.0%

Source: CHAS 2009-2013

Consol idated Plan BOWIE 17

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (ex p. 06/30/2018) The following tables break down each income segment by racial/ethnic category and the number of severe housing problems. The tables are HUD-generated tables using 2009-2013 CHAS data.

Table 16 0%-30% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the four Household has no/negative four housing housing problems income, but none of the problems other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 760 260 65 White 210 200 15 Black/ African American 440 so 40 Asian 0 0 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 95 4 0

Source: 2009-2013 CHAS

Table 17 31%-50% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the four Household has no/negative four housing housing problems income, but none of the problems other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 785 780 0 White 345 390 0 Black/ African American 280 270 0 Asian 30 25 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 10 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 119 49 0

Source: 2009-2013 CHAS

Table 18 51%-80% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the four Household has no/negative four housing housing problems income, but none of the problems other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 215 1,020 0 White so 420 0 Black/ African American 140 475 0 Asian 10 19 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 10 110 0

Source: 2009-2013 CHAS

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 18

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Table 19 81%-100% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the four Household has no/negative four housing housing problems income, but none of the problems other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 250 1,190 0 White 90 570 0 Black/ African American 120 505 0 Asian 10 10 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 30 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 0 55 0

Source: 2009-2013 CHAS

The following HUD CPD map shows areas of Bowie with low-income households with severe housing problems. The map shows concentrations in the central and northern areas of the City.

% of LI Households With Any of 4 Severe Housing Problems

<17.14%

17 14-41 05%

41 .05-60.74%

60.74-83 64%

>83.64%

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 19

0MB Control No : 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens

HUD defines a disproportionately greater number of housing cost burdens when a racial/ethnic group experiences housing cost burdens at a rate greater than 10% more than for the income level as a whole. The table below summarizes the percentage of each racial/ethnic group experiencing housing cost burden. Racial/ethnic groups are sub-divided into the percentage of each racial/ethnic group paying less than 30%, between 30%-50%, and above 50% of their gross income on housing costs. The column labeled no/negative income is the population paying 100% of their gross income on housing costs. This, however, is assuming that these households have housing costs.

Based on this definition, the following household types experienced disproportionately greater housing cost burdens in Bowie:

• American Indian/Alaska Native households with housing cost burdens between 30-50% of AMI, and

• Hispanic households with household cost burdens above 50% of AMI

This information is shown in the table below.

Table 20 Summary Table: Housing Cost Burden by Race Less than 30% No/ negative income (No Cost More than 50% (not computed) Burden) %

White 75 .6% 16.2% 8.2% 0.3% Black/ African Arrerican 59.5% 28.9% 11 .6% 0.4% Asian 78.7% 13.1 % 8.2% 0.0% Arrerican Indian, Alaska l\lative 50.0% 37.5% 12.5% 0.0% Pacific Is lander 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 46.1% 31 .9% 22.0% 0.0%

Source: CHAS 2009-2013

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 20

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (e xp. 06/30/201 8) NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion

Income categories in which a racial or ethnic group has disproportionately greater need

Across all income categories, Black/African-American households experienced housing problems disproportionately, and among low- and very low-income income categories, Black/African-American households experienced severe housing problems disproportionately.

Needs not previously identified

TBD

Are any racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or neighborhoods in your community?

To best determine the location of racial/ethnic groups with disproportionately greater need, maps were created matching areas of low-moderate income (LMI) concentration with areas of racial/ethnic concentration. Areas of LMI concentration are block groups with greater than 23 .72% of low-to moderate income residents. Areas of racial/ethnic concentration are census tracts in which a racial/ethnic group's share of the population is at least 10% greater than that group's share of the City population as a whole. Areas where LMI and racial/ethnic concentration intersect indicate impacted areas in which there is disproportionately greater need. The thresholds for areas of concentration are shown in the chart below:

Table 21 Housing Needs Assessment Demographics Racial/Ethnic Group Percent of Total Area of Population Concentration White 38.4% 48.4% Black 51.3% 61.3% American Indian/Alaska Native 0.1% 10.1% Asian 4.7% 14.7% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 10.0% Some Other Race 1.4% 11.4% Two or More Races 4.0% 14.0% Hispanic 6.4% 16.4% Total 100.0% 100.0%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 ACS {802001, 803003)

Ten census tracts in Bowie have concentrations of Black residents. No census tracts had a concentration of Hispanic residents. Four LMI block groups intersect with racially/ethnically concentrated areas. These areas are largely in the central areas ofthe City, with one in the southernmost area . The four areas are :

• Census Tract 8005.16, Block Group 1

• Census Tract 8005.16, Block Group 2

• Census Tract 8005.11, Block Group 2

• Census Tract 8004.10, Block Group 3

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 21

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) The maps on the following pages display this information. Map 1 shows the areas of black concentration in Bowie, Map 2 shows the areas of LMI concentration, and Map 3 show where LMI and minority concentration intersects.

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 22

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Map 1: City of Bowie Areas of Black Concentration

Legend

- Area of Black Concentration >61 .3"A D Census Tracts Bowie Block Groups D City of Bowie -- MaJor Roads

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 23

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Map 2: City of Bowie LMI Areas

Legend

~ LMIAreas c:::::::J Census Tracts C=:J Bowie Block Groups c:::::::J City of Bowie -- Major Roads

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 24

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Map 3 City of Bowie Areas of LMI and Black Concentration

LMI Areas

Census Tracts

Areas of Black Concentration >61 .3% I Bowie Block Groups City of Bowie

Major Roads

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 25

0MB Control No : 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) The following HUD CPD map shows areas of concentrations of Black households. The map shows concentrations in the southern and northern areas ofthe City.

t::

Map Legend X

Black or African American alone (not Hispanic)

<6.85%

6.85-22 6%

22_6-45.37%

45 37-74_1%

>74_1%

Discussion of Racially Impacted Areas from 2012 Al

(To Be Added)

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 26

0MB Control No : 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) NA-35 Public Housing

Public housing is provided by the Prince George's County Housing Authority. T here is no public housing located in the City of Bowie.

The following information is based on Prince George's County Housing Autho rity data for the entirety of Prince George's County. Only Section 8 vouchers are included due to the absense of public housing in Bowie. There a re 133 voucher holders residing in the City; however, specific data on these were not available.

Table 22 Totals in Use Program Typ e Certificate Mod Public Vouchers Rehab Housing Total Project - Tenant - Special Purpose Voucher based based Veterans Family Disabled Affairs Unification • Supportive Program Housing # of units/vouchers in use 0 190 362 4,624 96 3,991 82 389 0

Source: PIC /PIH Inf ormation Center)

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 27

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/ 30/ 2018) Table 23 Characteristics of Residents Program Type Certificate Mod- Public Vouchers Rehab Housing Total Project - Tenant - Special Purpose Voucher based based Veterans Family Affairs Unification Supportive Program Housing Average Annual Income 0 14,237 14,155 17,079 10,882 17,028 13,517 15,943 Average length of stay 0 6 7 8 7 9 0 7 Average Household size 0 2 1 3 2 2 1 3 # Homeless at admission 0 0 0 9 0 8 0 1 # of Elderly Program Participants (>62) 0 19 134 547 11 506 9 19 # of Disabled Families 0 51 141 835 28 685 36 79 # of Families requesting accessibility 0 190 362 4,624 96 3,991 82 389 features # of HIV/AIDS program participants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # of DV victims 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Source: P/C {PIH Inf ormation Center)

Table 24 Race of Residents Program Type Race Certificate Mod Public Vouchers Rehab Housing Total Project - Tenant Special Purpose Voucher based based Veterans Family Disabled Affairs Unification • Supportive Program Housing White 0 0 18 147 3 117 3 23 0 Black/African American 0 190 342 4,464 93 3,865 77 365 0 Asian 0 0 2 6 0 6 0 0 0

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 28

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/ 30/2018) American Indian/Alaska 0 0 0 7 0 3 2 1 0 Native Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Source: PIC /PIH Information Center)

Table 25 Ethnicity of Residents Program Type Ethnicity Certificate Mod- Public Vouchers Rehab Housing Total Project - Tenant - Special Purpose Voucher based based Veterans Family Disabled Affairs Unification • Supportive Program Housing Hispanic 0 1 7 51 2 37 1 11 0 Not Hispanic 0 189 355 4,573 94 3,954 81 378 0

Source: PIC /PIH Information Center)

Section 504 Needs Assessment

There are no public housing units in the City of Bowie.

Needs of public housing tenants and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units

There are no public housing units in the City of Bowie.

Most immediate needs of residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice voucher holders

TBD

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 29

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/ 30/ 2018) How do these needs compare to the housing needs of the population at large

There is no data available on the number of persons and type of populations in Bowie that are seeking public or affordable housing. However, the needs noted above are largely concurrent with identified needs in the City. There is a lack of affordable housing units for small non-elderly households, and there is a large population of elderly persons in need of more affordable housing options.

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 30

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment TBD

Table 26 Homeless Needs Assessment Population Estimate the # of persons Estimate the # Estimate the# Estimate the # Estimate the# of experiencing homelessness on a experiencing becoming ex1t1ng days persons given night homelessness each homeless each homelessness each experience year year year homelessness

Persons in Households with Adult(s) and Child(ren) Persons in Households with Only Children Persons in Households with Only Adults Chronically Homeless Individuals Chronically Homeless Families Veterans Unaccompanied Child Persons with HIV Severely Mentally Ill Chronic Substance Abuse Victims of Domestic Violence

1 Source: Prince George s County Continuum of Care1 2017 Point-In -Time Homeless Count

Jurisdiction's Rural Homeless Population

Not applicable.

For persons in rural areas who are homeless or at risk of homelessness, describe the nature and extent of unsheltered and

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 31

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/ 30/2018) sheltered homelessness with the jurisdiction

Not applicable.

If data is not available for the categories "number of persons becoming and exiting homelessness each year," and "number of days that persons experience homelessness," describe these categories for each homeless population type (including chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth}:

According to Prince George's County's 10- Year Plan, a quarter of all respondents said they had experienced homelessness for two years. Another quarter said they had experienced homelessness for four months to one year. Just under a quarter of respondents said that had been experiencing homelessness for less than three months. The remaining quarter had been experiencing homelessness for three or more years.

No additional information is available on the length of stay by subpopulation.

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 32

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group

TBD

Table 27 Sheltered Homeless by Race Race Individuals in Emergency Individuals in Permanent Shelters Supportive Housing White, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic Black or African-American Asian American Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Several Races Unknown Source: Prince George's County Sheltered Homeless Persons Report, 201 7.

Nature and Extent of Unsheltered and Sheltered Homelessness, including Rural Homelessness

There are no homeless shelters in Bowie; however, the City is in the service area of shelters and service providers located in the County.

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 33

0 MB Control No: 2506-0117 {exp. 06/30/2018) NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment Characteristics of Special Needs Populations

Persons with special needs include the elderly and frail elderly, persons with severe mental illness, developmentally disabled, physically disabled, persons with alcohol/other drug addictions, and public housing residents. The segments ofthese populations requiring special housing options has not been quantified. Many persons with such special needs also have very low incomes. Therefore, their needs may have already been taken into account in estimating the housing needs of persons with very low incomes. However, for some people, supportive housing - housing with supportive services - is needed as they are unable to undertake the activities of daily living (ADL) without assistance.

Supportive housing is defined as living units that provide a range of services needed for the resident to achieve personal goals. Various subpopulations with special needs require supportive housing. The needs of these subpopulations are described below.

Elderly and Frail Elderly

Elderly persons may need housing assistance for two reasons - financial and supportive. When a person has one or more limitations on activities of daily living (ADL), he or she may need assistance to perform routine activities of daily living and, therefore, can be considered frail. Supportive housing is needed when an elderly person is both frail and very low income since housing assistance offers services to compensate for the frailty in addition to the financial assistance. By this definition of need, there are no elderly that require supportive housing, only frail elderly.

The number of persons age 65 and older in Bowie in 2016 was 7,657 persons, or 13.3% of the population, compared to 5,547 persons, or 10.2% ofthe population in 2010. There is no data on the number of frail elderly living in Bowie.

Persons with Mental, Physical, and/or Other Developmental Disabilities

Severe mental illness includes the diagnoses of psychoses and the major affective disorders such as bipolar and major depression. The condition must be chronic, meaning it has existed for at least one year, to meet the HUD definition for a disability.

Not all persons with disabilities require supportive housing; however, those that cannot live with supportive family or are in need of help in basic life activities do require supportive housing and/or services. Physically disabled individuals usually require modifications to their living space including the removal of physical barriers. Generally, accommodations are made to adapt the unit for use by wheelchair bound persons. There is no data on accessibility features of private rental units in Bowie.

According to 2016 American Community Survey data :

• Among the civilian non-institutionalized population, 9.3% reported a disability

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 34

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) • The likelihood of having a disability varied by age - from 5.0% of people under 18 years old, to 13.2% of people 18 to 64 years old, and to 65 .6% ofthose 65 and over.

The data shows a higher level of disability for persons 65 and over than for all other age groups.

Persons with Alcohol or other Drug Addictions

There is no data available on the number of persons in Bowie with alcohol or other drug addictions.

Persons with HIV/AIDS and their families

Through the federal Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA), the County provides housing for 125 individuals or families with HIV/AIDS. There is no data on the number of individuals or fam ilies in Bowie living with HIV/AIDS.

Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking

There is no data available on the number of City residents who are victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking.

Housing and Supportive Service Needs and Determination

Generally, needs are determined by the social service and housing agencies most directly in contact with special needs populations in the City of Bowie and Prince George's County.

The largest special needs population is the elderly population. This group is presently served by a variety of supportive services including assisted housing at the Bowie Commons project, housing rehabilitation programs by the City of Bowie, and extensive recreational and educational services at the Bowie Senior Center. Despite these existing services, the growth in the elderly population may necessitate additional investments in senior services to meet the growing need.

The following describes the needs of disabled persons in Bowie:

• The unemployment rate of persons with a disability is 9.7% while the unemployment rate among persons without a disability is 6.8%. lower, fixed incomes severely restrict housing choice for persons with disabilities, particularly as it relates to rental deposits, downpayment and closing costs for home purchases, or home maintenance for homeowners.

• limited income and the high cost of housing accessibility modifications make homeownership extremely difficult. A program designed to assist with downpayment and closing costs would help with homeownership opportunities for persons with disabilities.

• While the poverty rate of those with a disability is lower overall than those without a disability, the poverty rate ofthose with a disability age 65 and above is slightly higher than the same age group without a disability (5 .0% vs 3.5%). Affordable, accessible housing for the elderly is an identified need.

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 35

0MB Control No: 2506-011 7 (exp. 06/30/2018) Public Size and Characteristics of Population with HIV/AIDS

Bowie is within the District of Columbia's HOPWA program which provides funding to Prince George's County. Within this service area, there are 1,202 unduplicated households being served with housing assistance. Of the individuals served, 1% are veterans and 3% are chronically homeless individuals. There is no additional data specific to the City of Bowie on the population with HIV/AIDS.

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 36

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs Non-housing community development needs were identified through stakeholder interviews conducted for the Consolidated Plan .

Public Facilities

TBD

Public Improvements

TBD

Public Services

TBD

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 37

0MB Control No : 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Housing Market Analysis

MA-OS Overview

Housing Market Analysis Overview:

The housing stock in the City of Bowie consists primarily of single-family owner-occupied units with three or more bedrooms. Bowie has 20,314 occupied housing units comprised of 82.8% owner units and 17.2% rental units. Most of the homes (89.9%) are single-family units, with a substantial number of attached townhouse-style owner-occupied units. A majority of both the owner-occupied units (92.9%) and renter-occupied units (51.6%) have three or more bedrooms. Of the 20,314 occupied units, only 935 units (or fewer than 5%) are studio or one-bedroom units. In addition, a need exists for more affordable rental and sales options for younger households in the 25-44 age cohort.

As the population grows in Bowie, demand will continue for large, owner-occupied units for established families; however, additional demand is growing for smaller units. Bowie's population is aging, and smaller and more affordable units will be needed for those elderly residents desiring to age in place.

Cost of Housing:

Between 2000 and 2013, the median income for City residents has increased by 2.2%, after adjusting for inflation, while median contract rent increased by 20.7% and median home values increased by 41.8%. This means that housing costs take up a relatively larger share of income for households in the City compared to 2000. As a result, buying or renting a house in Bowie became less affordable between 2000 and 2013 .

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 38

0MB Control No : 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) MA-10 Number of Housing Units

All residential properties by number of units

Bowie is largely a bedroom community in suburban Washington, DC. According to 2016 American Community Survey (ACS) estimates, Bowie had 21,104 housing units, of which 20,314 (96.3%) were occupied and 790 (3 .7%} were vacant. The number of housing units increased 12.7% or 2,386 between 2000 and 2016. Coupled with the increase in housing units, however, was a slight increase in the number of vacant units from 2.8% to 3.7% of the housing stock in the same period. In addition, the rental vacancy rate dropped from 12.4% in 2010 to 7.6% in 2016, indicating a tightening rental market.

Table 28 Total Housing Units, 2000 and 2016 Property Type 2000 Percent 2016 Percent Total Housing Units 18,718 100% 21,104 100% Occupied Units 18,188 97.2% 20,314 96.3% Vacant Units 530 2.8% 790 3.7% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census (QT-Hl) and 2012-2016 ACS (DP-04).

The majority of units (89.9%) in Bowie are single-family homes, either detached or attached units. Single family detached homes have increased by 12.3% between 2000 and 2016. Meanwhile, the number of housing units in buildings of more than 20 units increased from 719 units in 2000 to 1,016 units in 2016, the largest percent increase of any property type.

Table 29 Unit Types, 2000 and 2016 Property Type 2000 Percent 2016 Percent Percent Change 1-Unit Detached 13,386 71.9% 15,039 71.3% 12.3% 1-Unit Attached 3,556 19.1% 3,935 18.6% 10.7% 2-4 Units 148 0.8% 174 0.8% 17.6% 5-20 Units 775 4.2% 920 4.4% 18.7% More than 20 Units 719 3.9% 1,016 4.8% 41.3% Mobile Home, Boat, RV, Van, etc. 38 0.2% 20 0.1% -47.4% Total 18,622 100.0% 21,104 100.0% 13.3% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census (DP-4) and 2012-2016 ACS (DP-04). Nate: Total 2000 housing units differ from previous table due to use of estimate data.

Unit Size by Tenure

The majority (93%) of owner-occupied units have three or more bedrooms. A slim majority of renter occupied units (52%) also have three or more bedrooms, but close to a quarter of rental units are two bedroom units, and almost a quarter (24%) are one-bedroom units. Only 7% of owner-occupied units are one- or two-bedroom units. Studio units in Bowie represent only 1% of the housing stock and are all rental units. This reflects the nature of the Bowie housing market: it is predominantly a single-family, owner-occupied housing stock with three or more bedrooms.

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 39

0MB Control No : 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Table 30 Unit Types by Tenure, 2013 Property Type Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied

No Bedroom 7 0% 28 1% 1 Bedroom 125 1% 637 23% 2 Bedrooms 1,074 6% 677 24% 3 or More Bedrooms 15,472 93% 1,446 52% Total 16,678 100% 2,788 100% Data Source: 2009-2013 ACS

Number and Targeting of Units

There are no public housing units within the City of Bowie. There are a number of privately assisted housing complexes according to HU D's Picture of Subsidized Housing. These include Bowie Commons, an affordable elderly project with a 96% occupancy rate. There are no privately assisted multi-family developments located in Bowie.

Units Expected to be lost from Inventory

According to PolicyMap data, the Pin Oak Village I and II developments, completed in 1996 and 1998 respectively, contain a total of 220 units. Both phases were constructed using low income housing tax credits (LIHTCs) and remain affordable to low-income seniors. No additional information was available on other units expected to be lost from inventory.

Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population?

The current inventory does not include an adequate supply of more affordable rental units and smaller sales units. This limits housing options for moderate-income smaller families, singles, and senior citizens looking for smaller housing options.

Need for Specific Types of Housing

With the increasing population, there will be continued demand for additional housing. The changing demographics and stakeholder input reveal a continued need for affordable elderly housing and programs that allow seniors to age in place. As home values continue to rise, it is becoming more difficult for seniors on fixed incomes to remain in their homes. There is not an adequate supply of affordable units available for senior citizens.

Rising home prices have also made Bowie an unaffordable place for young families with children to live.

The relative lack of small rental units also makes it difficult for singles and young people to access housing in Bowie.

Finally, the limited number of small housing units at affordable prices makes it difficult to find housing for members of the workforce. With a high number of jobs in the retail and service sectors in Bowie, a

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 40

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) large workforce is needed; however, workers earning service sector wages are not able to afford housing in Bowie.

MA-15 Cost of Housing

According to a variety of sources, Bowie's housing market is extremely strong. This is reflected in the cost of housing. While many communities were adversely affected by the 2007-2009 housing crisis, Bowie's housing values have increased significantly, even when adjusting for inflation.

Cost of Housing

The cost of housing in Bowie has increased rapidly since 2000. The median home value in 2013, as reported in the American Community Survey (ACS), was $305,300. This was an increase of 41.8% since 2000 after adjusting for inflation. Similarly, median contract rents increased more than $600 dollars or 20.7% since 2000. This means that housing has been getting increasingly more expensive in Bowie.

Table 31 Cost of Housing, 2000 and 2013 Base Year: 2000 Most Recent Year: 2013 % Change

Median Home Value $157,800 $305,300 +93% ($215,274 in 2013 {41.8% adjusted} dollars) Median Contract Rent $946 $1,558 +65% {1,291-in 2013 dollars) {20.7% adjusted} Data Source: 2000 Census (Base Year), 2009-2013 ACS (Most Recent Year); Bu reau of Labor Statistics, "CPI Inflation Calculator" .

Rental rates have also increased. More than 82% of all rentals in Bowie leased for $1,000 or more in 2013 . This high rent would require an annual income of at least $40,000 if a household were to pay no more than 30% of income for housing costs.

Table 32 Rent Paid, 2000 and 2013 Rent Paid Number % Less than $500 202 7.3% $500-999 293 10.5% $1,000-1,499 848 30.4% $1,500-1,999 1,091 39.1% $2,000 or more 354 12.7% Total 2,788 100.0% Data Source: 2009-2013 ACS

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 41

0 MB Control No: 2506-011 7 (ex p. 06/ 30/2018) As shown on the following map, median contract rents over $1,000 are prominent thoughout the City, with the exception of pockets in the southern and northern areas of Bowie.

Median Contract Rent

<$500

$500-$1 ,000

$1 ,000-$1 ,250

$1 ,250-$1 ,500

>$1,500

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 42

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) The National Low Income Housing Coalition provides annual information on the Fair Market Rent (FMR) and affordability of rental housing in counties and select cities in the U.S. In Prince George's County, the FMR for a two-bedroom apartment was $1,746 in 2017. In order to afford this level of rent and utilities without paying more than 30% of income on housing, a household must earn $5,820 monthly or $69,840 annually. Assuming a 40-hour work week, 52 weeks per year, this level of income translates into a Housing Wage of $33.58.

In Prince George's County, a minimum-wage worker earns an hourly wage of $9.25. In order to afford the FMR for a two-bedroom apartment, a minimum-wage earner must work 145 hours per week, 52 weeks per year. The NLIHC also estimates that the average renter hourly wage in 2017 was $16.18. Even at this wage, a renter would only be able to afford a unit at $841. Less than 6% of units in Bowie are available at that price.

Below is the number of affordable units available to households with various income levels.

Table 33 Housing Affordability % Units Affordable to Households Earning: Renter Owner 30% HAMFI 105 No Data 50% HAMFI 340 335 80% HAMFI 645 1,243 100% HAMFI No Data 2,963 Total 1,090 4,541

Source: 2009-2013 CHAS Table 34 Monthly Rent, 2018

Source: 2018 HUD FMR and HOME Rents

Availability of Sufficient Housing

The availability of sufficient housing for low-income households in Bowie is limited as reflected by U.S. Census data and discussions with affordable housing advocates. The CHAS data comparing median contract rent from 2000 to 2013 shows a 20.7% increase, adjusted for inflation. As a result, the inventory of affordable rental units significantly decreased at the same time that rental rates increased. While units renting for under $1,000 in 2000 accounted for more than 60% of all rental units, by 2013 these more affordable units accounted for less than 6% of rentals.

There is not a sufficient supply of housing units available to persons of low-to-moderate income, both in the rental market and the sales market. In addition to the decrease in units renting for less than $500.

Expected Change of Housing Affordability

With population growth expected to continue and a strong economy in the metropolitan region, demand for units will continue. The falling vacancy rates and rising prices of-sales and rental housing

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 43

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) units in the City reveals an extremely strong housing market. Coupled with high demand for housing as described by stakeholders and with limited land for future development, the demand for housing will continue to outpace the supply. This will send home prices and rents higher, thus making housing even more unaffordable for those of low-to-moderate income seeking to live in Bowie.

Rent Comparison

Bowie's median rent of $1,558 (2013 median contract rent) is comparable to the HOME Rents/FMR for most of the zero to one-bedroom units, and higher than the two-bedroom HOME Rent/FMR. This reflects the need for more affordable housing units.

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 44

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) MA-20 Condition of Housing

Definitions

TBD

Condition of Units

The table below shows the number of housing units, by tenure, based on the number of conditions or characteristics the unit has. Selected conditions are similar to housing problems in the Needs Assessment and include (1) the lack of complete plumbing facilities, (2) the lack of complete kitchen facilities, (3) more than one person per room, and (4) cost burden greater than 30%. The table also includes the calculations for the percentage of total units that category represents.

Renter-occupied un its have a higher percent of units with a substandard condition; however, most units only have one substandard condition. Few owner or renter-occupied units have more than one substandard condition.

Table 35 Condition of Units, 2013 Condition of Units Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied

With one selected Condition 5,530 33% 1,095 39% With two selected Conditions ---53 0% 58 - 2% With three selected Conditions 10 0% 0 0% With four selected Conditions 0 0% 0 0% No selected Conditions 11,085 66% 1,635 59% Total 16,678 99% 2,788 100% Data Source: 2009-2013 ACS

Year Unit Built

Most of the units built in Bowie, both owner-occupied and renter-occupied, were constructed after 1950. While 10% of the units built since 2000 are owner-occupied, 13% of renter-occupied units have been built since 2000 according to the 2009-2013 CHAS data. While a greater percentage of rental units have been bu ilt since 2000, the number of new rental units is still less than new owner-occupied units. While 364 rental units were built in the last decade, 1,686 owner-occupied units were built during that same period.

Table 36 Year Unit Built Year Unit Built Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied

2000 or Later 1,686 10% 364 13% 1980-1999 6,773 41% 1,472 53% 1950-1979 8,047 48% 861 31% Before 1950 172 1% 91 3%

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 45

0MB Cont rol No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/ 30/2018) j Total 16,678 100% 2,788 100% I Data Source: 2009-2013 ACS

Since many of the units built in Bowie, both owner-occupied and renter-occupied, were constructed between 1950 and 1979, there is a likelihood that some of the units contain lead-based paint. Due to the fact that a higher percentage and significantly higher number of owner-occupied housing units than renter-occupied units were built before 1980, a lead-based paint program in the City should target owner-occupied units.

Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard

HUD has made the elimination of housing units containing lead-based paint a priority. The poisoning of children from contact with lead-based paint has been recognized as a major public health problem by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) . According to the CDC, lead is the number one environmental health hazard to American children. It is estimated that 10-15% of all preschoolers in the United States are affected. Lead poisoning causes IQ reductions, reading and learning disabilities, decreased attention span, hyperactivity, and aggressive behavior. Lead-based paint was banned from residential paint in 1978. All homes built prior to that time may contain lead-based paint.

As the following table highlights, it's estimated that 50% of renter-occupied units built before 1980 with children present are at risk of lead-paint hazards, while only 10% of the owner-occupied units have a comparable risk level.

Table 37 Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied

Total Number of Units Built Before 1980 8,219 49% 952 34% Housing Units build before 1980 with children ------1,590 10% 1,395 50% present

Source: 2009-2013 CHAS

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 46

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Vacant Units

TBD

Table 38 Vacant Units Suitable for Not Suitable for Total Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Vacant Units TBD 0 250 Abandoned Vacant Units N/A N/A N/A REO Properties N/A N/A N/A Abandoned REO Properties N/A N/A N/A Source: City of Bowie

Need for Owner and Rental Rehabilitation

TBD

Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low or Moderate Income Families with LBP Hazards

According to 2009-2013 CHAS data, it's estimated that 1,395 units (50%) of renter-occupied units built before 1980 with children present are at risk of lead-paint hazards, while only 10% of the owner occupied units have a comparable risk level.

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 47

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing

The City of Bowie is served by Prince Geo rge's County Housing Authority. The Hou si ng Authority operates 377 units, none of which are located within the City of Bowie.

Table 39 Totals Number of Units Program Type Certificate Mod- Public Vouchers Rehab Housing Total Project - Tenant - Special Purpose Voucher based based Veterans Family Disabled Affairs Unification • Supportive Program Housing # of units vouchers available 0 194 377 5,176 0 5,176 499 3,491 0 # of accessible units I •includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition I Data Source: PIC (PJH Information Center)

Supply of Public Housing Development

There are no public housi ng units in the City of Bowie.

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 48

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/ 30/2018) Table 40 Public Housing Condition ~ihi=i·l'hi"4•iM@M•ieMii •¥@ii441eM44•i•i"11·1·, _ N/A N/A ~

Restoration and Revitalization Needs

There are no public housing un its in the City of Bowie.

Strategy of Improving the Living Environment of low- and moderate Income Families

There are no public housing units in the City of Bowie.

Con solidated Plan BOWIE 49

0MB Control No : 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) MA-30 Homeless Facilities

Facilities Targeted to Homeless Persons

Bowie is part ofthe Prince George's County Continuum of Care (Co(). There are no shelters within the City, but there are a number of housing units provided to homeless persons by churches. These are generally scattered in apartment complexes owned by the City or within the church complexes. The community is served by a number of shelters throughout Prince George's County. The following data on facilities and housing targeted to homeless is from the CoC and includes all of Prince George's County. No specific data is available for the City.

Households with Adult(s) and Child(ren) Households with Only Adults Chronically Homeless Households Veterans Unaccompanied Child(ren)

Source: Prince George's County Continuum of Care

Consolidated Plan BOWIE so

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the extent those services are used to complement services targeted to homeless persons.

Upon entry to homeless facilities, participants will receive intense case management to address significant barriers to self-sufficiency such as lack of employment, savings, credit repair issues and life skills. The Continuum assists in job searches, increasing skills when needed, and ultimately obtaining and/or maintaining a job. It has been a CoC practice for a number of years to evaluate every shelter entry for the need for mainstream resources for customers with the first 72 hours of arrival. In addition, public welfare (TCA, SNAP & M/ A programs) fall under the administering oversight of the CoC lead agency and challenges experienced by the providers in getting applications processed can often be resolved in-house. Presently, the CoC is engaged in a series of discussions with Prince George's County hospitals to develop strategies to address the health and housing needs of chronically homeless individuals. Many homeless patients suffer from serious mental illness, substance abuse disorders and physical disabling conditions. They are typically uninsured. To assist with health problems that are exacerbated by living on the streets, the CoC established a satellite office at Prince George's County Hospital to help poor and low-income patients apply for and access mainstream programs and medical assistance for which they are eligible. For many of these individuals, this is the first time they come into contact with such mainstream services.

Case managers routinely assist residents with applying for mainstream services and work collaboratively with representatives of mainstream programs to track progress. The CoC also invites guest speakers to give presentations and overviews on program eligibility and requirements to help remove systemic barriers and increase access to mainstream programs. In addition, case managers frequently accompany vulnerable residents to complete and access benefits and/or complete the applications on-line where possible. Several mainstream providers such as DSS's public welfare offices have specially designated processes at the branch offices to ensure streamlined service helping to further expedite access to benefits.

List and describe services and facilities that meet the needs of homeless persons, particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth. If the services and facilities are listed on screen SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure or screen MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services, describe how these facilities and services specifically address the needs of these populations.

TBD

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 51

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (e xp. 06/30/2018) MA-35 Sp-ecial Needs Facilities and Services

Including the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental), persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, public housing residents and any other categories the jurisdiction may specify, and describe their supportive housing needs

As described in NA-45, needs are generally determined by the social service and housing agencies most directly in contact with special needs populations in the City of Bowie and Prince George's County.

The following describes the needs of disabled persons in Bowie:

• The unemployment rate of persons with a disability is 9.7% while the unemployment rate among persons without a disability is 6.8%. Lower, fixed incomes severely restrict housing choice for persons with disabilities, particularly as it relates to rental deposits or downpayment and closing costs for home purchases.

• Limited income and the high cost of housing accessibility modifications make homeownership nearly impossible. A program designed to assist with downpayment and closing costs would help with homeownership opportunities for persons with disabilities.

• While the poverty rate of those with a disability is lower overall than those without a disa.bility, the poverty rate of those with a disability age 65 and above is slightly higher than the same age group without a disability (5 .0% vs 3.5%). Affordable, accessible housing for the elderly is an identified need.

Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health institutions receive appropriate supportive housing

The CoC continues to work collaboratively with the hospital social workers and DSS staff to gather relevant data and develop feasible strategies for identifying housing and treatment options for chronically homeless persons with disabling conditions. These meaningful discussions will continue to lead to identification of appropriate housing alternatives that prevent vulnerable homeless individuals from being released to the streets as well as reduce the public cost associated with non-reimbursed emergency room care.

Maryland has a formal protocol that has been designated for publicly-funded mental health institutions to which the CoC adheres. The discharge policy is listed under the Health General Article of Annotated Code 10-809 which prohibits discharges from state facilities to homelessness. All collaborating mental health agencies/facilities prepare a written After Care Plan that includes life skills, vocational and social

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 52

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) rehabilitation, job skills, case management, supportive services and housing. The agencies are responsible for ensuring that participants approaching discharge are not discharged into homelessness. The Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene is a participating member of the Coe and is responsible for ensuring compliance amongst provider agencies.

Many of the individuals at risk of being discharged into homelessness are suffering from serious mental illness and/or a co-occurring disorder. Most of them do not trust shelters or living with strangers, therefore a significant number - even when housing is offered - return by choice to their prior living situation which includes encampments in the woods. The PIT team and the DSS street outreach teams are intimately familiar with many of these individuals and have been able to develop a level of trust over time that has enabled the CoC to begin to achieve some significant success. The HSP sub-committee for chronically homeless, mentally ill, substance abusing, dually diagnosed and/or disabled persons has identified several gaps in service delivery and are working to develop a series of recommendations to the CoC for implementation including strategies to formalize the discharge plan and ways to help this population secure the mainstream benefits and written diagnoses needed to qualify them for PH .

Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.21S(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. 91.315(e)

TBD

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 53

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (ex p. 06/30/2018) MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing

Negative Effects of Public Policies on Affordable Housing and Residential Investment

TBD

Barriers to Fair Housing

The City of Bowie and Prince George's County completed a joint Al in 2012. While the majority of identified impediments and proposed actions referred specifically to the County, one impediment was identified for the City of Bowie :

• The City does not allocate any of its CDBG entitlement funds to fair housing activities.

As a proposed action, it was recommended that the City allocate at least 1% of its annual CDBG entitlement grant to carry out fair housing activities.

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 54

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets

Economic Development Market Analysis

The following HUD-generated tables contain data pertinent to economic development in the City of Bowie. Discussion and analysis of the data follow Table 48.

Table 42 Business Activity in City of Bowie, 2013 Business by Sector Number of Number of Share of Share of Jobs Jobs less Workers Jobs Workers % workers % % Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas Extraction 36 0 0 0 0 Arts, Entertainment, Accommodations 2,766 3,380 13 24 11 Construction 1,303 1,165 6 8 2 Education and Health Care Services 4,282 1,751 20 13 -7 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 1,326 656 6 5 -1 Information 690 955 3 7 4 Manufacturing 484 25 2 0 -2 Other Services 1,263 335 6 2 -3 Professional, Scientific, Management Services 3,649 1,420 17 10 -7 *Public Administration 0 0 0 0 0 Retail Trade 2,541 3,306 12 24 12 Transportation and Warehousing 579 145 3 1 -2 Wholesale Trade 710 290 3 2 -1 Total 19,629 13,428 ------Data Source: 2009-2013 ACS (Workers), 2013 Long1tud1nal Employer-Household Dynamics (Jobs)

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 55

0MB Control No: 2S06-0117 lexp. 06/30/2018) Table 43 Labor Force in City of Bowie, 2013 Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 33,086 Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over 30,849 Unemployment Rate 6.76 Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 23.55 Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 4.57

Source: 2009-2013 ACSOccupations by Sector in City of Bowie, 2013 Sector Number of People Management, business and financial 11,021 Farming, fisheries and forestry occupations 1,312 Service 1,950 Sales and office 7,040 Construction, extraction, maintenance and repair 1,772 Production, transportation and material moving 1,052

Source: 2009-2013 ACS

Table 45 Travel Time for City Residents, 2013 Travel Time Number Percent < 30 Minutes 11,173 38% 30-59 Minutes 12, 399 42% 60 or More Minutes 5,633 19% Total 29,205 100%

Source: 2009-2013 ACS

Less than high school graduate 62 3 64 341 High school graduate (includes equivalency) 4,419 444 751 Some college or Associate's degree 7,847 376 1,105 Bachelor's degree or higher 13,107 540 1,277

Source: 2009-2013 ACS

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 56

0MB Control No : 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Table 47 Educational Attainment by Age, 2013 .,

Less than 9th grade 39 152 12 230 187 9th to 12th grade, no diploma 213 97 2 45 - 292 392 High school graduate, GED, or 1,326 1,196 1,6 76 2,780 1,798 alternative Some college, no degree 2,137 1,319 1,7 52 4,527 1,358 Associate's degree 324 370 4 74 1,033 252 Bachelor's degree 670 1,908 2,2 81 4,277 1,250 Graduate or professional degree 27 1,280 1,852 3,417 964

Source: 2009-2013 ACSEducational Attainment and Median Earnings in the Pa st 12 Months Educational Attainment Median Earnings in the Pa st 12 Months Less than high school graduate $29,21 9 High school graduate (includes equivalency) $41,25 0 Some college or Associate's degree $51,53 9 Bachelor's degree $69,62 5 Graduate or professional degree $92,79 3

Source: 2009-2013 ACS

Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major emp loyment sectors within your jurisdiction?

The major employment sectors include Retail Trade and Arts and Entertain ment, which each account for 24% of all jobs within the City, or almost half of all jobs combined, as displa yed in Table 42. The education and health care services sector accounts for another 13% of the total share of jobs. These sectors are represented by Bowie Town Center as well as the large health-c are related businesses within the City limits, which represent major employment centers. Bowie State Un iversity is immediately adjacent to the City of Bowie.

While these sectors are major employers within the City, the data clearly su pports Bowie as a bedroom community. While the City has 19,629 workers, it provides only 13,428 jobs . This means 32% of employed City residents commute from Bowie to jobs elsewhere. Note: The Business Activity table is likely incomplete. For example, the Public Administration field is blank. Th is is highly unlikely, given Bowie's proximity to the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. It is more lik ely that a high number of public administration workers commute into Washington, D.C. to work in th _e federal government offices. This table is HUD -generated and cannot be duplicated or modified.

Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business co mmunity:

TBD

Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, sue h as planned local or

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 57

0 M B Control No: 2506-011 7 {exp. 06/30/2018) regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create

TBD

How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction?

As displayed in Table 47-48, the majority of residents within the City of Bowie have at least some college education. There is a clear mismatch between the types of jobs within the City and the educational attainment of residents. Many of the City's jobs are in sectors typically available to those with a lower level of educational attainment, yet many of the City's residents are at the highest educational attainment level. Pos itions within Bowie will either go unfilled or workers will need to commute into Bowie, increasing congestion on the City's roads and within the City's transit routes.

Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan

The Prince George's Workforce Services Corporation (WSC), through the Workforce Services Division, is the primary service provider with offices located in Largo. Services include:

• Vocational training

• GED Training

• Job readiness training and counseling

• Access to information about job openings

• Training programs for specific retailers including CVS, Giant Food and Safeway

• Employment Referral

The City works with the WSC to provide business referrals for job placements of Welfare-to-Work clients. Through the leveraging of resources and collaborations in the public and private sectors, WSC also offers affordable housing, dental care, clothing and mental health counseling in addition to jobs and training.

Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)?

N/A

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 58

0 MB Control No: 2506-011 7 (ex p. 06/ 30/2018) If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth.

TBD

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 59

0MB Control No : 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) MA-SO Needs and Market Analysis Discussion

Are there any populations or households in areas or neighborhoods that are more affected by multiple housing problems?

Accord ing to CHAS data presented, minority populations at various income levels are experiencing a disproportionate number of housing problems, including overcrowding and a lack of adequate kitchen and bathroom facilities. The following populations are disproportionately affected by housing problems:

• All Black households with incomes up to 100% of AMI

• Asian households with incomes at 0-30% and 81-100% of AMI

• American Indian/A laska Native households with incomes at 81-100% of AMI (small sample size)

• Pacific Islander households with incomes at 0-30% of AMI, and

• Hispanic households at 51-80% and 81-100% of AMI

In add ition, the following populations are disproportionately affected by severe housing problems which include greater degrees of overcrowding and cost burden:

• Black households with incomes at 0-30% of AMI

• Asian households with incomes at 81-100% of AMI

• American Indian/Alaska Native households with incomes at 31--50% of AMI (small sample size), and

• Hispanic households at 0-30% and 31-50% of AMI

Are there areas in the Jurisdiction where these populations are concentrated?

Ten census tracts in Bowie have concentrations of Black residents. No census tracts had a concentration of Hispanic residents. Four LMI block groups intersect with racially/ethnically concentrated areas. These areas are largely in the central areas of the City, with one in the southernmost area . The four areas are :

• Census Tract 8005.16, Block Group 1

• Census Tract 8005.16, Block Group 2

• Census Tract 8005.11, Block Group 2

• Census Tract 8004.10, Block Group 3

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 60

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods?

Several of Bowie's LMI areas consist of contiguous blocks of lower income households residing in lower cost homes, all of which are surrounded by higher-income households in higher-cost housing.

Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods?

All of the areas identified are relatively strong, intact communities that contain the City's affordable housing stock. While most identified areas do not include job centers, one exception is Bowie Town Center. This commercial shopping destination is a major employment and shopping center.

Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas?

TBD

Consolidated Plan BOWIE 61

0MB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Housing Support Initiatives

Fair Housing

The City of Bowie, in conjunction with the Prince George's County Human Relations Commission and the Prince George's County Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing (AI) in June 2012. The analysis, and consultant's recommendation for the City of Bowie was as follows :

NOTE:

The City incorporates these findings, as approved by HUD for its previous Consolidated Plan FY2014 - 2018, into the Consolidated Plan for FY2019 - 20134 (HUD FY2018 - 2022). It is the City's intention to update the Consolidated Plan with new and/or additional information from its joint Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing with the Prince George's County Human Relations Commission and the Prince George's County Department of Housing and Community Development when it is completed in December 2018.

4 City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, Maryland 20716

August 13, 2012

Vanessa Barnard Washington, D.C. Field Office, Region III U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 820 First Street, N.E. , Suite 450 Washington, D.C. 20002-4205

Dear Ms. Barnard:

The City's consultant, Mullin & Lonergan (M&L) has completed the City's Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI). The AI was conducted at the direction of your office due to the age of the last AI from Prince George's County, which the City is dependent upon due to statutory relationships regarding zoning and housing permits and development authority. The City and the County used the same consultant; however, the consultant has not completed the AI for the County.

Due to matters of timeliness and the filing of the City's latest Annual Action Plan and upcoming CAPER, we requested and received the consultant's Executive Summary of the City's part of the combined PGC/Bowie AI (See enclosed document). Based on the consultant's analysis and recommendations for the City of Bowie, the City Council has accepted the recommendations and approved an AI Action Plan for the City (See enclosed AI Action Plan).

If you have any questions or additional requests, please contact me on (301) 809-3094.

Sincerely, 4;ll1- i::tor Office of Grant Development & Administration

Cc: David Deutsch, City Manager

Enclosures

MAYOR G. Frederick Robinson MAYOR PRO TEM Diane M. Polangin COUNCIL Dennis Brady + Henri Gardner + James L. Marcos + Isaac C. Trauth + Todd M. Turner CITY MANAGER David J. Deutsch City Hall (301) 262-6200 FAX (301) 809-2302 TDD (301) 262-5013 WEB www.cityotbowie.org R-65-12 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOWIE, MARYLAND ADOPTING THE ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING (Al) ACTION PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2013

WHEREAS, the City of Bowie (City), Maryland is entitled to receive annual Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program funds directly; and

WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution R-51-08 on August 4,

2008 adopting the City of Bowie Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community

Development; and

WHEREAS, as an Entitlement Community the City must adopt a Analysis of

Impediments to Fair Housing (Al) Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2013; and ·

WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development mandates an AI for all Entitlement Communities; and

WHEREAS, the AI Action Plan has been developed based on a detailed analysis by a nationally reputable AI consulting firm (Mullin & Lonergan); and

WHEREAS, the AI Action Plan will guide the City's actions to pursue activities to curtail and remedy elements of discrimination in housing, and

WHEREAS, the proposed AI Action Plan requires an expenditure of 1% of the annual CDBG fund allocation; and

WHEREAS, the requirements of the Citizen Participation process have been adhered to and that public participation in the development of this Housing and

Urban Development Al Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2013 has been solicited; and

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of

Bowie does hereby approve the Housing and Urban Development Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2013 attached as

Attachment l to this Resolution; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to

submit this plan to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for their

review and approval.

INTRODUCED AND PASSED by the Council of the City of Bowie,

Maryland at a Regular Meeting on August 6, 2012.

G. Frederick Robinson, M

ATTEST:

JLF/jb/a City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, Maryland 20716

MEMORANDUM

To: City Council

From: David Deutsch (/i ~ City Manager/JO fJ

Subject: City of Bowie Adoption of Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing (AI) Action Plan

Date: August 6, 2012

In 2003 the City of Bowie became an Entitlement Community under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. Since that time, the City has relied on the County's AI to meet HUD's requirements for actions in support of Fair Housing Choice and Enforcement. In 20 I 0, HUD rejected the City's continued use of the County's AI and cited it as being over 14 years old and, therefore, no longer in compliance with HUD rules and current housing market conditions. To satisfy HUD's fair housing requirements, the Prince George's County Human Relations Commission and the City of Bowie hired Mullin & Lonergan Associates (M&L) to conduct a detailed Analysis oflmpediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI). M&L completed the City's AI several months ago and in June 2012 sent an Executive Summary of the complete document to the City; we felt that we could not wait for the final document which needed significant input from the County. The Prince George's County AI is still under development. Since the City does not have zoning authority, the majority of the burden for fair housing enforcement rests with the County.

According to HUD, an analysis of impediments to fair housing choice should accomplish the following:

Evaluate population, household income, and housing characteristics by protected classes in each of the jurisdictions; ·

Evaluate public and private sector policies that impact fair housing choice;

Identify blatant or de facto impediments to fair housing choice, where any may exist;

MAYOR G. Frederick Robirnmn MAYOR PRO TEM Diane M. Polangin COUNCIL Dt'nni~ Brady + Henri Gardner + James L. Marcos + Isaac C. Trouth • Todd M. Tumer CITY MANAGER David J. Deutsch City Hall c.,01) 262-62(){) FAX (301 l 809-2302 TDD 001 l 262-5013 WEB www.cityolbowie.org Recommend specific strategies to overcome the effects of any identified impediments

Additionally, an Entitlement Community should:

Examine and attempt to alleviate housing discrimination within their jurisdiction

Promote fair housing choice for all persons

Provide opportunities for all persons to reside in any given housing development, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin

Promote housing that is accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities, and

Comply with the non-discrimination requirements of the Fair Housing Act

The analysis found that the City of Bowie is moderately segregated, has only one of 55 impacted areas (area that has high concentration of low to moderate income residents, and high minority concentration) within Prince George's County, the median family income in the City of Bowie for 2011 was 99,883, versus $70,753 for Prince George's County, and that female-headed households with children accounted for more than half of all families living below the poverty level. The report noted that as of January 2012, there were no pending fair housing suits, unlawful segregation suits, or court orders filed in the City.

The study also found that the City primarily dedicated its 2008 CDBG allocation to infrastructure and engineering design for street and sidewalk improvements; determined that housing rehab for seniors is the highest priority for the City's CDBG program for FY 2009-2013; and does not currently allocate CDBG funds specifically for fair housing activities. The firm recommended that the City should allocate 1% of its CDBG funds each year to fair housing activities such as education and outreach.

In response to the analysis and the recommendations, staff proposes the following:

• To set aside 1% of its FY 2013 CDBG allocation ($1,650) to further fair housing efforts. • Offer Fair Housing education sessions (2-4) - free and open to the public - during the current fiscal year. • Provide fair housing literature and training to the business community and homeowner associations • Require all City Department Directors, Assistant Directors, and Department of Community Services Property Inspectors to attend fair housing education sessions. • Forward any fair housing complaints to the HUD Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FEHO) for evaluation/investigation. • Confirm the number of available housing units with Prince George's County Department of Housing and Prince George's County Housing Authority 2-4 times per year. . • Monitor County and the State fair housing training and enforcement activities. • Coordinate the City's fair housing activities through the City Manager's Office, Office of Grant Development & Administration

DISCUSSION: Staff has read the analysis and prepared an AI Action Plan to address the findings of the analysis as required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The AI Action Plan is attached.

RECOMMENDATIONS: We recommend that Council adopt the proposed AI Action Plan for Impediments to Fair Housing Choice and authorize the plan to be sent to HUD.

Attachment:

The City of Bowie's Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing (AI) Action Plan for FY- 2013 1. Executive Summary

A. Introduction to the Analysis of Impediments The Urban County of Prince George's County and the City of Bowie have prepared an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (Al) to satisfy requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. This act requires that any community receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds affirmatively further fair housing. As a result, the Urban County and City are charged with the responsibility of conducting their CDBG programs in compliance with the federal Fair Housing Act. The responsibility of compliance with the federal Fair Housing Act extends to nonprofit organizations and other entities, including units of local government, which receive federal funds through the Urban County and the City. Entitlement communities receive CDBG to: • Examine and attempt to alleviate housing discrimination within their jurisdiction • Promote fair housing choice for all persons • Provide opportunities for all persons to reside in any given housing development, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin • Promote housing that is accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities, and • Comply with the non-discrimination requirements of the Fair Housing Act. (1) These requirements can be achieved through the preparation of an Al. The Al is a review of a u jurisdiction's laws, regulations, and administrative policies, procedures, and practices affecting the 0 ..s::: location, availability, and accessibility of housing, as well as an assessment of conditions, both public and (.) private, affecting fair housing choice. O') C: Equal and free access to residential housing (housing choice) is a fundamental right that enables Cl) :::s members of the protected classes to pursue personal, educational, employment or other goals. Because 0 housing choice is so critical to personal development, fair housing is a goal that government, :r: public officials and private citizens must embrace if equality of opportunity is to become a reality. .... c,:s LI.. B. Information Relevant to the City of Bowie .....0 As stated previously, this report was begun as a joint Al for both the Urban County and the City of Bowie...... Cl) C: Due to circumstances beyond its control, the City has determined it is in its best interest to move forward (1) with presentation of this Al Executive Summary to City Council for its consideration and action. The City E is preparing its 2013 Annual Action Plan for submission to HUD and desires to include the recommended "C OJ action in the Al in its submission. C. E Once the Urban County finalizes its portion of the Al document, a complete and final joint Al will be .... provided to the City of Bowie and the Urban County. 0 Cl)

Cl) C. General Observations >, c,:s The following observations were noted throughout the Al. These issues are based on the primary C: research collected and analyzed and the numerous interviews and focus group sessions conducted for ct this report. They help to establish ~ontext for the impediments. While none of these observations individually rose to the level of an impediment to fair housing choice in the Urban County or the City of Bowie, the issues remain noteworthy in that they establish context for the recommended actions included in the Al. 1. The City of Bowie and to a lesser extent the Urban County have experienced significant demographic shifts since 1990, from predominantly White to predominantly Black communities. In 1990, Whites accounted for 40.5% and 91 .3%, of the population in the Urban County and City of Bowie, respectively. By 2010, Blacks were the majority group in each jurisdiction, and the White population had decreased to 17.7% and 41 .4%, respectively. Diversity among minorities also increased during this period in the Urban County, as both Asian and Hispanic populations increased significantly. 2. There are 128 areas of minority concentration in the Urban County and six areas of . concentration in the City of Bowie. The large majority of these are concentrations of Black residents (85 census tracts in the Urban County and all six in Bowie). There are also six tracts of Asian concentration and 37 tracts of Hispanic concentration in the Urban County. 3. Prince George's County and the City of Bowie are moderately segregated, with respective dissimilarity indices of 48.8 and 49.2 for Whites/Blacks. However, the dissimilarity index for most other racial and ethnic groups is significantly lower in the City of Bowie than in Prince George's County overall. The dissimilarity index for Whites/Asians in the City is significantly lower at 35.0 and for Whites/Hispanics at 20.3. 4. Despite being a relatively affluent community, median household incomes in Prince George's County (including the City of Bowie) remained significantly lower than those Q,) in the surrounding five counties. (.) 0 Prince George's County also had the highest poverty rate among the surrounding counties. .c 5. Members of the protected classes were more likely to live in poverty. u C") There are 55 impacted areas in the Urban County and one in the City of Bowie, which include C: (I) concentrations of both LMI persons and minorities. In the Urban County, 92% of census tracts ::::s 0 identified as concentrations of LMI persons were also areas of minority concentration. :c Consequently, in the Urban County, areas of minority concentration are significantly more ,_ likely also to be areas of concentration of LMI persons. ('Q LI.. Black households and Hispanic households were less likely to have lower incomes (less than ....0 $25,000) in the City of Bowie than elsewhere in Prince George's County. This reflects median (I) household income trends, which show that median incomes for minorities in Bowie are higher C: -Q,) than those in the County. E Persons with disabilities were more like to live in poverty than persons without disabilities. In "C -, 2000, female-headed households with children accounted for 52.3% of families living below ('Q the level of poverty and in Bowie, female-headed households with children accounted for C: 57.4% of families living in poverty. Consequently, securing affordable housing will be < especially difficult for this segment of the population. 6. The sales housing market in Prince George's County (including the City of Bowie) is an inherently affordable one for households earning the median household income.

2 In 2010, 52% of the units sold were affordable to households earning $70,753. By comparison, only 3.7% of units sold in 2006 (at the height of the housing market) were affordable to households earning median household income. The median sales price in Prince George's County decreased more significantly than in neighboring counties. Over the past decade the median sales price in Prince George's County · has been the lowest among the five counties which it borders. However, by 2010 the disparity among the counties had grown, and the median sales price in Prince George's County was more than $90,000 less than in any of the surrounding counties. The average sales price in Bowie decreased from $288,771 in April 2010 to $265,739 in March 2011 . During this period, the average days on the market also increased from 87 to 97 days.

D. Impediments to Fair Housing Choice and Recommended Actions The following observations collected during the development of the Al constitute the impediments, or barriers, to fair housing choice listed in this section. These impediments are linked to remedial strategies in the Fair Housing Action Plan. 1. The City does not allocate any of its CDBG entitlement funds to fair housing activities. In FY2010, the City's CDBG entitlement was $174,744; however, none of this grant was allocated for fair housing activities. Although Bowie's CDBG entitlement is small, the City has (l.) an obligation to affirmatively further fair housing. Allocating 1% of its annual fair housing (.) activities, equivalent to approximately $1 ,700, would enable the City to implement worthwhile 0 .c activities such as fair housing education and outreach. (.) Proposed Action: The City should allocate 1% of its annual CDBG entitlement grant to O') C: carry out fair housing activities. V) ::::, 0 :::c:... co I.I...... 0 .....V) C: (l.) E "O (l.) Q. E -0 V) V) >-. co C:

3 2. Signature Page for the City of Bowie By my signature I certify that the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice for the City of Bowie is in compliance with the intent and directives of the regulations of the Community Development Block Grant Program.

G. Frederick Robinson, Mayor

Date

Cl,) (.) 0 .c u C, C (/) ::I 0 :I:... ell u...... 0 (/) C -Cl,) E "C Q.l 0.. E -0 (/)

V) >, «I C: <

City of Bowie and the AI

To satisfy the requirements of the Federal Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, HUD requires all communities that receive Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to affirmatively further fair housing.

As a result, the City of Bowie is required to conduct an AI Study and prepare an AI Action Plan to be in compliance with the federal Fair Housing Act. HUD and the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing An analysis of impediments to fair housing choice should accomplish the following: Evaluate population, household income, and housing characteristics by protected classes in each of the jurisdictions; Evaluate public and private sector policies that impact fair housing choice; Identify blatant or de facto impediments to fair housing choice, where any may exist; Recommend specific strategies to overcome the effects of any identified impediments Entitlement Communities

Examine and attempt to alleviate housing discrimination within their jurisdiction Promote fair housing choice for all persons Provide opportunities for all persons to reside in any given housing development, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin Promote housing that is accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities, and Comply with the non-discrimination requirements of the Fair Housing Act Prince George's County (PGC) and the City of Bowie PGC and the City of Bowie were required by HUD to conduct an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing (AI). PGC maintains zoning authority and housing development authority in the City of Bowie. The majority of all AI functions within the City of Bowie are under the control and supervision of PGC through zoning and development enforcement activities.

The New AI

PGC retained Mullin & Lonergan Associates (M&L) to conduct an "Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice". City of Bowie also retained M&L to complete an independent analysis for the City. M&LA has completed the City's AI. PGC AI still in progress. M&L General Observations for the City of Bowie

The City of Bowie: Has experienced a significant demographic shift since 1990. Is home to 6 of the 128 areas of minority concentration in the county. Is moderately segregated. Has only one of 55 impacted areas in PGC. Female headed households w/ children accounted for more than half of all families living below the poverty level in the City. M&L Findings for City of Bowie Bowie median housing value outpaced actual household income, indicating a greater likelihood that homebuyers will have difficulty purchasing housing units.

The supply of decent, affordable housing remains inadequate.

Of 2351 rental units in the City of Bowie, 17 rent for $500- $699/month, translating into few affordable housing options for Bowie Citizenry.

85.2°/o and 85°/o of Black renters and Black homeowners, respectively, experienced a problem identifying decent, affordable housing.

The City does not currently utilize any of its CDBG allocation to promote fair housing. M&L Recommendations for the City of Bowie

The City should allocate 1°/o of its annual CDBG entitlement grant to carry out fair housing activities. These activities should include fair housing education and outreach. Bowie City Council Actions

On May 21, 2012, Council approved the City's Annual Action Plan FY13. On May 22, 2012 the Mayor signed the AI Executive Summary completed by M&L and approved the implementation of the recommendations made by M&L. The City will set aside 1°/o of its 2013 CDBG allocation ( rv$1,650) to further fair housing efforts. On May 22, 2012 the City forwarded the Annual Action Plan and AI documents signed by the Mayor to HUD. City of Bowie AI Action Plan Initiatives

Offer Fair Housing education sessions - Free and open to the public - during the fiscal year. Conduct community outreach and training sessions for citizens, housing organizations, and commercial entities. Utilize the City's programs and facilities to disseminate information regarding Fair Housing. Consult PGC and State agencies on Fair Housing activities. Forward Fair Housing complaints to FEHO for evaluation/investigation. Provide updates to HUD as required.

Please forward all comments to:

Jesse Buggs, Director Office of Grant Development and Administration City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, MD 20716 e-mail: Several County nonprofit organizations have housing components that address housing counseling, fair housing counseling, housing legal assistance, affordability and accessibility: CASA of Maryland, Inc., Housing Initiative Partnership, Inc., Independence Now, Inc. , Korean Community Center, Inc., Mission of Love, Inc., Spanish Catholic Center, Inc., Spanish Speaking Community of Maryland, Inc., United Communities Against Poverty, Inc. and Boys and Girls Homes, Inc.

Prince George's Department of Housing and Community Development's (DHCD), Housing Development Division has an active affirmative marketing program. The County requires property owners and developers to comply with fair housing laws including posting of signs and symbols notifying clients of fair housing practices; providing verbal and written instructions to employees and informing applicants on DHCD waiting lists of available properties and vacancies. The County's Rental Assistance Division carries out a number of fair housing activities. These include:

Landlord Initiatives

Through this 1mtlatlve, landlords are encouraged to make rental units handicapped accessible, to join the Regional Opportunity Counseling (ROC) and to maintain tight Housing Quality Standards (HQS).

Regional Opportunity Counseling

The Regional Opportunity Counseling (ROC) Program provides housing opportunity counseling to families participating in the Section 8 Program in order to move out of neighborhoods of concentrated poverty.

Section 8 Home Ownership Program

The Section 8 Home Ownership Program (SHOP) is an educational counseling incentive to encourage clients to graduate from Section 8 assistance, to resolve credit

5 problems, and to pre-qualify individuals for vanous homeownership programs.

Family Self Sufficiency

Family Self Sufficiency (FSS) helps Section 8 families remove reliance on all forms of public assistance, and become economically self-sufficient by developing a five year "contract" that maps out a strategy to secure stable employment.

Welfare to Work Initiatives

The Family Self-Sufficiency Resource Initiatives for Self Empowerment (FSS-RISE) Program, which is the first formal link between welfare and housing assistance.

Criminal Background Checks

In 1997, the Housing Authority of Prince George's County adopted a Policy Resolution on Criminal Background Checks (CBCs). In Prince George's County, CBCs are obtained for all persons 18 years of age and older prior to acceptance into housing assistance programs to determine eligibility for program participation and/or program continuation.

6 Housing Strategy

The City has a commitment to decent and affordable housing. However, several factors in the housing market are presenting challenges for homeowners and renters throughout the City. While foreclosures in the City are few, other economic conditions are causing extreme pressures to be exerted on other household expenditures. With some visual improvement to the core area of the oldest section of the City, Old Town Bowie community, and the addition of retail services in other areas, some economic vitality has been restored to the retail and housing market over the past four years. Commercial and residential units are being encouraged through financial incentive programs to revitalize properties in some areas of the City. Reviving the general visual character and oferings of retail centers has helped to create much needed incentives for homeowners and businesses owners to shop where they live.

The City believes that improving the current housing stock occupied by senior citizens and other groups will help stabilize communities throughout the City. The addition of "Energy Efficiency" and "Green" technologies to the housing rehabilitation program will also produce much-needed cost savings for this large and rapidly expanding population.

The City has also become a certified Sustainable Community under the MD Sustainable Communities Act of 2010. The MD Smart Growth Subcabinet approved the City's application on May 28, 2013. The following provides information on the significance of the Sustainable Community Designation:

MD Department of Housing and Community Development

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Erlene Wilson, 410-514-7704 JUNE 28, 2013 Andy DeVilbiss, 410-514-7710

Five New Sustainable Communities Designations Announced by Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development and Maryland Department of Planning

CROWNSVILLE, MD (June 28, 2013) - The Maryland Smart Growth Sub Cabinet announced the designation of five new "Sustainable Community Areas" under the state's Sustainable Communities Act of 2010. Under this Act, the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development Secretary Raymond A. Skinner is charged with making recommendations for the designation to the Sub-Cabinet, which is chaired by Maryland Department of Planning Secretary Richard E. Hall. The newly designated sustainable communities are the Town of Chesapeake City (Cecil County), the City of Bowie (Prince George's County), and three areas of Baltimore County - Catonsville/Patapsco, Greater Dundalk, and Hillendale/Parkville/Overlea.

7 "The Sustainable Communities Act has proved to be valuable resource for supporting local revitalization efforts, strengthening partnerships between state and local governments, and providing a framework to streamline access to a variety of state programs," said Secretary Skinner. "With their comprehensive efforts to improve downtown business districts, promote transit-oriented development, and expand commercial and housing opportunities, these communities deserve this designation and are welcome additions to our growing roster of Sustainable Communities."

"Sustainable Communities are an important part of our sustainable growth plan, PlanMaryland. They are areas where local communities and the state have undertaken to reinvest in opportunities for economic growth, housing and sustainable development," said Maryland Secretary of Planning Richard E. Hall. "These areas represent a partnership between local communities and the state to revitalize our existing communities for housing, economic growth, and other improvements. Maryland is a compact state and we do not have any communities to waste."

The fi ve newest designees join a distinguished group of cities and towns that demonstrate a strong commitment to the environment, local character and innovative development. Maryland's Sustainable Community strategy aims to increase transportation and housing choices and spur job creation and innovation.

A Sustainable Community Area is identified by a municipality or County as an area in need of revitalization and for which the local government has created a comprehensive strategy to encourage and guide local investment in accordance with the principles of sustainability. The comprehensive Sustainable Community strategy aims to increase economic, transportation and housing choices as well as the quality of the local life and the environment.

8 City of Bowie, Maryland Sustainable Community Target Areas

N A 1 inch = 5,000 feet

Legend

-- Major Roads Bowie Mixed Use Centers

Rt 214/Central Avenue

- Old Town Bowie - Data Sources: MNCPPC & The City of Bov.iie - Prepared by The City of Bov.ie Planning Dept. April 2012 Pointer Ridge -AN data is offered as is and without any actual or implied warranty as to accuracy . - S:\GIS\ArcMap_Projects\Sustainable Communities Targ et Areas.mxd West Bowie Village

9 Affordable Housing Strategy (HUD 215 Goals)

The City of Bowie has no zoning authority, and neither owns nor funds the construction or rehabilitation of housing. The City is not a participating jurisdiction in the federal Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME), and does not plan to use its federal CDBG funds for affordable housing projects. Therefore, its affordable housing goals for low and moderate-income households rely upon the County's goals.

The 2006 Census Bureau data states that 5,266 (11.90 % increase since 2000 Census) of Bowie's population is 65 and over. The City has encouraged developers to provide senior housing that meets various income brackets and needs. These housing units include independent living, congregate care, and assisted living housing. City staff intends to continue working with developers to ensure that senior housing will be available for low and moderate-income households to meet the needs of seniors projected to be living in Bowie over the next 10 years.

The 1996 "A Preliminary Report on Senior Housing for the City of Bowie", prepared by the City of Bowie Planning Department, states that, "if the trend of aging in place holds true, and the trend toward migrating to warmer climates does not increase, the number of senior and elderly remaining in the City will warrant the development of all of the types of senior housing identified in this report." These include independent living, congregate care, assisted living and skilled nursing facilities. In addition, continuing care or life care facilities will be needed to provide an array of services from independent living to full medical care. Based on this data, the following recommendations represent the core of the City's senior housing goals:

1. Work with developers who will provide a range of senior projects to ensure that senior housing will be available for various income levels.

2. Assess every two years the success of the work of private developers in providing housing to semors.

3. Work with the staff of the M-NCPPC to review and bring about County zoning changes that would permit more flexibility in developing senior housing.

4. Identify and recommend a balanced mix of housing to meet the needs of seniors projected to be living in the next 10 years.

The percentage of people living under the poverty level 1s mcreasing. It is expected that the characteristics of the low and moderate-income population assisted with federal and state funds through County and State-sponsored programs will continue to reflect an increasingly diverse City population. While 10 Table 2A indicates a high priority for very low and low-income cost burdened homeowners, the City finds these figures to be overstated. Therefore, the City will continue to encourage the development of a wide range of housing choices and ensure compliance with the housing objectives as stated in the City's Development Review Guidelines document.

The number of homeless individuals and families in the City will continue to be reflected in the County's totals for permanent and transitional housing. The number of housing units produced for extremely low, low and moderate income renters and home owners using federal funds will also be reflected by Prince George's County in its report, the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER).

Public Housing Strategy

The City of Bowie does not provide publicly assisted housing. Bowie Commons, however, provides 32 federally subsidized assisted senior housing units. There are 396 units of public housing administered by Prince George's County Government, none of which are within City limits. Of these, 296 are reserved for elderly and 80 are available for families. The County's Housing Authority also owns 16 family townhouse units in Capitol Heights and 11 single family homes in Upper Marlboro. Very low income Bowie residents are able to apply for these units. No displacement of public housing tenants in Bowie due to CDBG activities is anticipated.

The County administers 4,590 Housing Choice Vouchers, and there are another 4,300 units of assisted housing in the private market. In addition, the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments 2001 Housing Data Survey reports that there are 2,682 project-based multi-family housing units in the private market. These units are in the HUD-insured inventory of properties or have been assisted with low income housing credits. Another 7,800 units have been assisted with tax-exempt bond financing and are set-aside for lower income households.

The County lost 350 units of assisted housing in 2001. It is expected that several hundred additional units of assisted housing will be lost over the next five years as individual property owners pay off their mortgages and convert to all private market housing. This is especially true if rents in the Washington Metropolitan Area continue to rise and the overall vacancy rate continues to fall. These losses are expected to occur in inner Beltway communities, and residents of Bowie will not be affected. In addition, approximately 350 units of rental housing will be lost in the Suitland Manor complex.

11 B. HOMELESSNESS NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Nature and Extent of Homelessness

The Maryland Department of Human Resources Annual Report on Homelessness in Maryland, fiscal year 2007 states that there were 1,943 people from Prince George's County sheltered in FY 2007, representing 7 .1% of the state's total number of homeless. The majority were families with children. No data is currently available on how many of these households are or were residents of Bowie.

Prince George's County has implemented a Continuum of Care strategy. The City of Bowie's Grants & CDBG Administrator is the current Co-Chair of the County's Homeless Services Partnership. Working through the Homeless Services Partnership, a coalition of over 30 public and private agencies, the county is implementing and expanding services and programs that assist homeless individuals and families. The City of Bowie supports the efforts of the Homeless Services Partnership and refers city residents to County services and facilities. Countywide agencies provide outreach, intake and assessment, prevention, emergency shelter, transitional housing, permanent housing and supportive services.

The Christian Community Presbyterian Church contributed funds and the City of Bowie provided a grant of $25,000 to the Bowie Pantry in FY07. In a crisis situation, when no County or nonprofit agency is able to house a family or individual who becomes homeless, these funds may be used to provide hotel rooms. The number of clients serviced by the Bowie Pantry for FY14, FY15, and FY16 was 3,647, 4,762, and 4,410, respectively. The data in the chart below was collected based on the client's responses and caseworker's perceptions of the clients.

B ow1e. E mer~ency p antry Client I n i ormatlon FY14 FY15 FY16 African American 1,795 2,356 2,118 Asian 88 175 183 Hispanic 472 503 454 Native American 25 17 17 Caucasian 537 654 657 Mixed Race 74 82 65 Other 8 33 20 Veteran Unknown Unknown Unknown Handicapped Unknown Unknown - Unknown

12 The following is a list of homeless facilities in the county, which are available to residents of Bowie. Only St. Matthews Housing Corporation is located within the City and provides 18 transitional beds for individuals and families.

There are three County facilities that provide emergency shelter for families:

• The Family Emergency Shelter for 16 families with children in apartment-based shelters at University Garden Apartments, Langley Park.

• Shepherd's Cove, Capitol Heights, serving 700 persons annually, primarily families with children.

• Family Crisis Center, Inc., offering 26 beds for abused and/or homeless women with children. Services include resource referral for housing, physical and mental health care, education, trammg, employment services, and case management.

County emergency and transitional services and shelters for individuals:

• Prince George's House, Capitol Heights, a transitional shelter for 16 men.

• Thirty-three church-based shelters, including five in Bowie, in the Warm Nights program during the winter months.

• Job training, job search assistance and placement services contracted by the county with Jobs for Homeless People, Inc. , serving 150 formerly homeless people annually.

• Health Department, a transitional shelter with 40 residential treatment beds for persons with substance abuse.

• Department of Family Services, a transitional shelter with 20 beds for long term housing of ex-offenders with mental illness.

• Department of Family Services, providing 10 beds for transitional housing for youth leaving residential rehabilitation.

As there is no available data on homelessness specific to Bowie, the Homeless and Special Needs Population Table 1 A indicates mostly the existing County facilities and services to which City staff refers people. Given the lack of pertinent information, it is impossible to determine the unmet need. However, it can be assumed, due to the demographics of the City of Bowie and the prevalence of County and private programs and services that the unmet needs for additional facilities and services for homeless and special needs population in Bowie is low. The City's Grants Office also handles housing and homeless issues in the City and serves as the coordinator with County agencies. 13 HOMELESSNESS IN METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON

Results and Analysis from the Annual Point-in-Time (PIT) Count of Persons Experiencing Homelessness

May 2017

Prince George's County, MD Description of Homeless Services

The Prince George's County Continuum of Care (CoC) for homeless persons is coordinated through the County's Homeless Services Partnership (HSP); the local Homeless Advisory Board for the County Executive. The mission of the HSP is to ensure that episodes of homelessness are rare, brief and non-reoccurring and to that end, the HSP is responsible for needs assessments, gap analysis, service coordination, resource development, drafting and adoption of policy, and system performance evaluation of all homeless services. Membership includes over 100 public and private agencies, faith based organizations, service providers, mainstream programs, consumers and concerned citizens which meet monthly and work collaboratively to establish strategic priorities, assess progress, and oversee full implementation of the County's efforts to end homelessness. The Prince George's County Department of Social Services is the lead administering agency for the County's CoC and serves as the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) administrator; the Collaborative Applicant (CA) for the annual HUD Homeless Assistance grant application process; Co-Chair of the HSP; and the Maryland State Department of Human Resources' (DHR) local administrating agency for homeless assistance programs in Prince George's County.

14 The County has a comprehensive network of programs designed to provide a coordinated and systemic response to persons identified as at risk of, and / or, literally homeless as well as a coordinated entry system that ensures prioritization of those who are most vulnerable. All CoC services are coordinated through a central call center allowing persons in need to gain services and shelter without having to navigate multiple systems. The system currently includes: • Street Outreach , Mobile Crisis and SOAR; • 24/7/365 intake through the "Homeless Hotline" and Coordinated Entry; • Integrated Diversion and Homeless Prevention Services; • One (1) 30 bed emergency and two (2) 25-bed hypothermia overnight shelters in partnership with 40 faith-based organizations; • Seven (7) 24-hour emergency shelters including 1 specifically for veterans, 1 for DV / trafficking survivors, and 2 for unaccompanied youth; • Three (3) Rapid Re-Housing Program with two (2) more under development including 2 specifically for veterans; • Six (6) transitional housing programs including 2 specifically for unaccompanied youth and 2 for veterans; and • Fourteen (14) permanent supportive housing programs with one (1) more under development.

The County's strategic plan was derived from best practices evolving locally as well as nationwide and focuses on six (6) key strategies that have proven to be effective in reducing homelessness: 1. coordinated entry, 2. prevention assistance, 3. shelter diversion, 4. rapid re-housing, 5. permanent housing, and 6. improved data collection and performance measures. In addition, accommodations were made for six (6) subpopulations that have distinct needs requiring separate exploration: 1. Homeless or at risk unaccompanied youth, 2. Veterans, 3. Chronic homeless and other homeless with severe behavioral health challenges (SMI, SUD and COD), 4. Survivors of domestic violence and/or human trafficking, and 5. Returning citizens. The strategies are carefully designed to achieve purposeful and intentional reduction in the incidents of homelessness and collectively they form a plan that aligns County efforts with federal strategic goals, shifts system focus from "shelter" to "housing", prioritizes programming for special populations, enhances system accountability, builds on current success, and provides new flexibility and opportunity. Success is measured by positive movement in several key indicator areas including: Change in income, Recidivism, Length of Stay in Homelessness, Exits to Permanent Housing, and Reduction in new entry of first time homeless.

HOMELESS POINT-IN-TIME RESULTS

The Prince George's County homeless point- in-time count was conducted on Wednesday, January 25, 2017. The survey counted and interviewed unsheltered homeless persons living on the streets and sheltered individuals and families in overnight hypothermia shelters, 24- hour emergency shelters and transitional housing programs. A diverse group of volunteers and providers met weekly through conference calls and face to face sessions to plan and develop strategies for conducting the count. Training webinars were conducted that allowed volunteers and staff be universally trained regardless of location and availability and ensured consistency of survey application on the day of the actual PIT count.

15 The County's homeless management information system (HMIS) was used to conduct the sheltered count and the unsheltered count was conducted by volunteers. The volunteers were divided into seven teams each targeting specific zip codes and locations within in the County including known encampments, shopping malls, metro stations, libraries, soup kitchens and other areas where homeless gather. In addition, three (3) church based PIT day centers were opened offering food, showers and other services; providing an opportunity to capture homeless individuals who might otherwise be missed by the sweeps. The unsheltered count included an interview component to gather pertinent demographic, subpopulation, employment and other relevant data used to generate comparable data for this report.

On January 25, 2017, a total of 532 homeless adults and children were counted in Prince George's County, Maryland; (193 single adults, 124 adults in families, 214 children in families and 1 unaccompanied child) reflecting a 2% decrease from 2016. Of this number, 444 (84%) were sheltered and 88 (16%) were unsheltered. The following charts provides a comparison of the 2015, 2016, and 2017 counts and It is clear that the County has remained diligent and focused on the reducing episodes of homelessness. In spite of having the highest number of cost burdened households amongst neighboring jurisdictions and the largest foreclosure rate in the metropolitan area, the overall number of homeless continues to show a slight decline over prior year counts.

16 Special Needs Populations

The 2000 Census indicates that the city has 3,251 households with a family member that is 65 years or older. This represents nearly 6.5% of all Bowie households. The majority of Bowie's senior citizens reside in privately owned housing. Four senior citizen apartment residences are located in Bowie:

1. Bowie Commons has 32 units of federally subsidized housing. The operator of the facility leases the property from the city.

2. Pin Oak Village has 220 housing units reserved for senior citizens.

3. Somerset Park has 59 market rate mixed rental apartments and owner townhouse units. ·

4. Evergreen Senior Apartments has 110 market rental apartments units located in the Bowie Town Center.

A new 79-unit, market rate senior apartment residence building has been approved on Enfield Chase Court in the Bowie Town Center adjacent to the Evergreen Senior Apartments, to open in 2003. Additionally, there are 295 frail elderly housed in nursing homes in the City, and 32 non-elderly with special needs in nursing homes.

In addition to the senior citizen complexes in the City of Bowie, there are more than 30 private market rate senior residences in the County with over 3,000 housing units. There are 622 units of elderly housing in the County that were constructed with federal Section 202 funds that are set-aside for very low and low-income seniors. The County provides nearly 1,000 units of federally assisted housing (Housing Choice Vouchers) for elderly residents and 296 units of public housing. The Priority Needs Summary Table indicates that elderly renters have a very low unmet need for housing in the City because both the private and public markets offer sufficient housing opportunities to meet their needs.

The Volunteers of America has 24 Alternative Living Facilities (ALF) in Bowie that provide housing and services for chronically mentally ill persons. These are the only facilities located in the City that assists persons who are not homeless but who require supportive housing. It ensures that persons returning from mental institutions receive appropriate supportive housing. It is a countywide program, not limited to Bowie residents.

Many nonprofit agencies in the County provide an array of supportive housing services for the elderly and frail elderly, persons with disabilities, persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, and persons with HIV/AIDS. Through the federal Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS, the County provides housing for 125 individuals or families with HIV/AIDS. There are also 103 units of housing in scattered site group homes in the Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities program. The exact number and demographics on the special needs populations residing in Bowie are not currently available.

17 Homelessness Priorities

The city's faith-based community and the Bowie pantry (funded in-part by a grant from the City) provide the bulk of the assistance and services for the homeless. The City supports the Prince George's County Homeless Services Partnership and currently serves as its Co-Chair. The Partnership engages in the following activities:

Expansion of housing (Permanent and transitional) Educational support for youth Job counseling for adults Supplying food and medical services Job placement services Counseling in financial literacy Life skills training

Special Needs Populations Priorities

The City of Bowie offers supportive services to its senior population through an array of programs coordinated through the Bowie Senior Center. These programs include classes, educational programs, trips, and information and referral services for seniors, families and caregivers of senior citizens. In addition, there is transportation for adults 55 and older and individuals with disabilities within the city limits of Bowie. The Bowie Senior Center offers both congregate and home delivered meals Monday through Friday. The Nutrition Program is sponsored by the County's Department of Family Services. The Senior Citizens Program also provides a liaison service for the Bowie Senior Center Advisory Board, the Bowie Senior Citizen Clubs, and the seniors and Law Enforcement Together (SALT) council.

Homelessness Strategy

In the lack of specific demographic data on the city's homeless population, the age, household composition, gender and ethnicity of Bowie's homeless families are presumed to reflect those of Prince George's County. The State of Maryland's 2007 survey data indicates that 72% of the County's homeless population is comprised of families with children. The largest age category of people served is children between 0-17 years old; 56% of the homeless are male and 44% are female. There were 2,176 African Americans, 203 whites, 115 Hispanics, and 86 others who were in homeless shelters in the County during 2007.

The City of Bowie refers people in need to Prince George's County, as the County has 282 emergency shelters beds and 397 transitional shelter beds. These facilities are available to Bowie residents who become homeless. The County's Department of Social Services organizes 33 faith-based congregations to provide overnight shelter, case management and meals for approximately 50 homeless persons each night during the winter months. Several Bowie churches participate in this Warm Night program including Sacred Heart Catholic Church, St. Pius X Catholic Church, the Christian Community Presbyterian Church and St. Matthew's United Methodist Church. In addition, St. Matthew's Housing Corporation in Bowie provides 18 transitional housing beds for homeless families. Staff from the City's Youth Services Bureau also provide 18 family, group, and individual counseling; information and referrals; informal counseling, crisis intervention and suicide intervention services. The Youth Services Bureau sponsors 14 alcohol and drug free programs during the year.

The County's Emergency Shelter Grant program provides apartments for families while Shepherd's Cove and Prince George's House provide emergency shelters for women with children, and single men. The County also leases apartments in Greenbelt for transitional housing for families.

There are approximately 10 countywide nonprofit agencies and faith-based organizations that offer emergency and transitional housing throughout the year for homeless families with children and individuals. The Community Crisis Center Services, Inc., operates the Homeless Hotline and handles approximately 1,300 calls per month representing 400 households Countywide. About 100 households are referred to emergency shelters monthly, according to the Community Crisis Center data.

The County's Department of Social Services implements welfare initiatives through the Maryland Family Investment Program. Bowie residents in need may qualify for food stamps, public assistance, Temporary Cash Assistance for Needy Families, child care vouchers, job development programs, transportation assistance, homeless services, energy assistance, evictions prevention assistance, summer meals for children and after hour phone service for abuse complaints.

The County operates the Emergency Food Assistance Program to distribute Federal surplus foods to emergency food pantries and needy households. Bowie's Ascension Catholic Church coordinates food distribution in the City. Through the Maryland Emergency Food Program, emergency food providers purchase food for needy individuals and families. The Statewide Nutrition Assistance Program funds the purchase of capital equipment for emergency food pantries and food banks. Home delivered food and nutrition counseling also are available for persons with HIV/ AIDS.

19 C. NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEEDS ASSESSMENT

The city currently focuses on two areas for non-housing community and economic development: Old Town Bowie and the area on Rte. 450 that the City refers to as Main Street. Old Town Bowie has been a commercial district since the City's founding; as times changed and the City grew, the district slumbered and almost died. In the early 1990s the first effort to revitalize began with a major state bridge construction and road realignment project. Subsequently the City commissioned a redevelopment study, which resulted in a Master Plan that the city is now implementing. The City dubbed the Route 450 area Main Street again in the early 1990's as it came to grips with changing retail customs and new land use patterns. Once the shopping and city center of "Levitt" Bowie, the retail centers along Route 450 have faltered in the face of competition from newer centers on other highways, and from the changing nature of and consolidation in retail.

Public Infrastructure

In 1998, the County Council created a Biennial Growth Policy Plan to provide the framework for future growth management and planning. The Smart Growth Initiative is linked to the development of a sound infrastructure. Planners and elected officials recognize that as the County enters the 21st century, the health and safety of communities and neighborhoods are essential to the efficient use of the existing infrastructure.

Street improvements, accessibility improvements, rehabilitation, acquisition and demolition have been among the chief capital projects the County has financed with CDBG funds over two decades. The City of Bowie has participated in the County's CDBG program for the last 17 years conducting improvements to Old Town Bowie's aging infrastructure.

The 8,040 Levitt built homes in the 1960's were tied into the public water and sewer system. Most of the City streets were constructed after 1960. The City's Public Works Department has an annual street maintenance program, which keeps roads operable. Prior to 1958, the City consisted of Old Town Bowie. Over the years, storm drains and public water and sewer lines were installed in Old Town Bowie.

Public Facilities

The City of Bowie owns and maintains 15 buildings, which includes five public museums, a gymnasium, a public playhouse, and eight parks, one of which is the 65-acre Allen Pond Park surrounding the 10-acre pond and boathouse. The City maintains 22 miles of hiker/biker trails. There are 9 County operated schools in Bowie, and three community centers, some of which even have computer labs, operated by Maryland National Park and Planning Commission. The Bowie Public Library is centrally located on Rte. 450 Main Street next to Bowie High School. The Metro runs 10 lines and services 193 bus stops in Bowie. The MARC station, formally located at the Bowie Train Depot in Old Town Bowie, is now located at Bowie State University, just north of Bowie.

20 Bowie Health Center is an emergency care and surgical outpatient facility serving the Bowie/Crofton area and surrounding communities. It is a member of Dimensions Healthcare System, the largest not-for-profit provider of healthcare services in Prince George's County. Larkin Chase Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is a long-term care facility located on the campus of Bowie Health Center in Bowie, Maryland.

Senior Center

The new, state-of-the-art 29,000 sq. ft Bowie Senior Center offers opportunities for social, educational, and physical activities, as well as local and out-of-town trips for adults 55 years of age and older. The Senior Center includes seven classrooms, computer lab, fitness room, exercise room, billiards room, large multipurpose room, library, lounge, and a health and counseling suite.

Parks and Recreational Facilities

The Parks and Grounds Division maintains 75 recreational fields, 64 acres of parkland and flowerbeds, 22 miles of bike trails, throughout the City. There are an additional 22 M-NCPPC parks in Bowie. The City also constructed a 27,400 sq. ft. Municipal Gymnasium two years ago, which provides recreational programs and facilities for Bowie residents in addition to the three Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, (M-NCPPC), Community Centers, which also provide recreational provisions for residents.

A one million dollar addition/renovation has been under construction at the Ice Arena, which will contain locker rooms, showers, meeting space, and expanded areas for a food concessionaire and a pro shop. The Ice Arena provides a recreational program of indoor ice-skating for community residents. The majority of the available ice time is devoted to public skating sessions, group lessons, ice rentals (hockey and figure skating). The arena will open for its sixth summer in 2003. Summer activities include: learn to skate day camps, clinics for hockey and figure skating as well as public sessions, group lessons and other ice rentals. There will be dry floor activities in the facility in May and June, including the Bowiefest Home show and the Battle of the Bands.

Public Services

Public services address the health and safety concerns of Bowie citizens, particularly those low income and vulnerable populations. Resources are focused on special needs populations that include the elderly and frail elderly, persons with disabilities, and youth and families. Services reflect needs that include literacy training, health, transportation, crime awareness, employment training, and youth services.

The Department of Community Services provides programming for recreation, youth and families, and senior citizens. Neighborhood preservation services include Animal Control, Code Compliance, Building Permit and Rental Licensing. The Solid Waste Division is responsible for the collection and disposal of the City's solid waste. This includes special metal pickup, recycling, yard waste and twice weekly household refuse pickup.

21 The Public Works Department is responsible for the collection and treatment of raw sewage. The Bowie Waste Water Treatment Plant, (WWTP), was the first in the United States to utilize Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR). This is a natural treatment process that reduces the need for chemicals while improving effluent quality. Bowie's WWTP has won major environmental awards from the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and the Maryland Municipal League. Scores of plants along the Atlantic Coast have now adopted this BNR process.

The plant processes approximately 2.2 million gallons of sewage on a daily basis and serves the same areas of the City as does the Water Plant: Bowie Forest, Buckingham, Chapel Forge, Derbyshire, Foxhill, Glenridge, Gradys Walk, Heather Hills, Idlewild, Kenilworth, Long Ridge, Meadowbrook, Overbrook, Rockledge, Somerset, Tulip Grove, Victoria Heights, Whitehall, and Yorktown. All other areas of the City utilize the services of Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (WSSC) for wastewater treatment.

The City's Water Plant serves approximately half of the residents of Bowie. With a few limited exceptions, this system does not expand into newly developing areas. The Levitt Corporation constructed the system in the early 1960's. This division is responsible for the production and purification of the water supply for its customers.

The City draws its water from six wells from aquifers of the Magothy, Patapsco, and Patuxent Rivers at depths of up to 1,000 feet. The Water Plant is staffed seven days per week. The plant, which serves approximately 25,000 residents, processes and distributes an average of 2.3 million gallons of water per day. All other areas of the City obtain their water from the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (WSSC).

Senior Services

The Bowie Senior Citizen Program is a comprehensive, multifaceted service providing referrals to senior citizens, families, and caregivers of senior citizens. This program operates from the new state of the art Bowie Senior Center. The Senior Center, Gymnasium, Health Center, multiple senior apartment complexes and assisted living centers, and the Bowie Town Center, are all within walking distance to one another, and linked by paved hiker/biker trails and sidewalks.

The Bowie Senior Center has 120 active volunteers who donate their time in a variety of jobs. Meals are served at the Center, Monday through Friday at 11 :45 a.m. The meals are provided through the Prince George's County Department of Family Services, Aging Division for seniors 60 and over. Participants are asked for a donation. Participants age 55 - 59 pay full price for the meal. In addition, the Nutrition Program provides homebound meals. City Senior Transportation system delivers the meals to Bowie residents. In addition, the Food and Friendship Program provides both congregate and home delivered lunches to the senior citizen population.

The Senior Center also serves as a referral center for programs and activities provided by other county, state, and private agencies and groups.

22 Programs offered at the Senior Center are: • Classes through the Prince George's Community College Senior Program, with City funded instructors, or volunteer instructors. • Day Trips: local and out of town • Seminars and Lectures on issues of interest to seniors, i.e., health, financial etc.

Services offered at the Senior Center are: • Monthly Health Check provided by Prince George's County Health Department • Weekly Blood Pressure Check through Bowie Health Center, Prince George's County Health Department and volunteer nurses. • Prince George's County Department of Family Services, Aging Division Services include:

1. Information & Assistance worker to assist semors with locating appropriate services.

2. Mental Health Services (monthly). Individual counseling and group sessions.

3. Hearing Screening provided by Hearing Professionals, Inc. or Bowie Hearing Center.

Support Groups:

Hearing Impaired Aging Issues Support NAMI Parent Support (National Alliance for the Mentally Ill) Diabetes Support Parkinson's Support Weight Management

Other senior services available to residents include:

Tax Counseling--Trained volunteers through the Tax Counseling for the Elderly (TCE) program will help low to middle income seniors in Prince George's County in preparing their tax returns. Volunteers are available to help senior residents at the Bowie Senior Center through the tax season.

Bowie Senior Computer Classes-Computer classes are taught at the technology lab at the Bowie Senior Center. Courses taught range from Beginners, to Adobe Photo Shop, to Genealogy.

23 Bowie Senior Transportation Services-This program offers curb-to curb transportation for Bowie senior citizens age 55 and older to the Senior Center, medical appointments, scheduled shopping days, Senior Clubs, and other trips on a priority basis. Transportation within the City limits is offered to seniors. Curb-to-curb transportation is also provided for non-senior Bowie residents with disabilities for medical appointments and other trips within the City limits. A lift-equipped van is available for those in need.

There are approximately 100 health services provided Countywide by the public and private sector including Home Health (nursing, physical therapy, nutrition, etc.), hospitals, clinics, dental, vision, mental health, respite, hospice service, discount pharmacy and medical equipment.

Recreational Services

The City of Bowie sponsors several special events and concerts throughout the year. Of special interest is Bowiefest, held on the first Saturday in June at Allen Pond Park. This is a "community day" at which the various organizations, service groups, churches, interest groups, scouts and non profit groups assemble with crafters for a daylong celebration of the community that includes a variety of food and entertainment.

On July 4 annually, the City sponsors a Fireworks Display that includes a variety of foods and entertainment during a daylong celebration at Allen Pond Park.

In autumn, the Arts and Expo fair held at Allen Pond Park features upscale artists selling a variety of artwork. This is complemented by all day entertainment and music with wine tasting from Maryland wineries.

Services for the Disabled Persons

Please refer to Senior Transportation section above.

Substance Abuse Prevention Services

Of the 32,948 adults estimated in need of substance abuse treatment in the County, only about 2,000 are in treatment each year. The County provides extensive outpatient drug treatment for adolescents, women and children.

The City of Bowie's Youth and Family Services (BYFS) provides substance abuse prevention programming for youth. BYFS meets annually with guidance staff, principals and Parent Teacher/Student Associations to conduct comprehensive planning with area elementary, middle and high schools. Substance abuse prevention awareness education for students and for parents and teachers is conducted in each school. Seven public elementary schools are assisted with Red Ribbon Month (October) drug & alcohol abuse programs. They are offered the Project Save program, a reading reinforcement and substance

24 abuse risk factor reduction program, for early elementary grades 1 through 3. Sixth graders are offered a Decision Making course in a group setting at three of the seven schools each year. Two local private schools have participated in the Red Ribbon Campaign and the Project Save Program.

Benjamin Tasker Middle School is provided assistance and facilitators for their Red Ribbon Substance Abuse Prevention Program each year. Four prevention oriented events are conducted for middle school children each year. In addition, the Maryland Assistance Program is now in its third year at Tasker, which consists of a multidisciplinary intervention team providing drug and alcohol risk screening and referral services to students and their parents.

Bowie High School is in their fifth year participating in the Maryland Assistance Program. Substance abuse prevention activities are most active at the high school level, with the sponsoring of at least twelve drug and alcohol-free events. These events are designed by youth for youth and are conducted in part by youth.

In addition, the Community Prevention Network assists with events at community-based venues throughout the year. To conduct and promote these events this year, they partnered with M-NCPPC, the Bowie Town Center, the Prince George's County Police Department, Outback Steakhouse, Target, Borders Books, the Bowie Baysox, Bowie Elks, and the Greater Bowie Chamber of Commerce.

Employment Training

The County has several programs to assist those people who have been out of the work force for an extended period and have complex problems like chronic illness, substance abuse, and severely limited education and work experience. The Prince George's County Department of Social Services (DSS) administers national welfare reform or Welfare to Work, known in Maryland as the Family Investment Program. In 1999, DSS developed a Family Investment Program Plan for the years 2000 to 2002 to emphasize the expectation of employment while preserving the self-esteem of participants. Please refer to the Economic Development needs section below for further details on City and County employment training services.

Child Care Services

The City of Bowie does not provide childcare services for residents. Inquiries regarding childcare provisions in Bowie are referred to the County's Child Care System called LOCATE. The County provides residents with a list of licensed day care providers in their area.

Educational Outreach

Between 1997 and 2002, the City of Bowie offered a free drop-in tutoring program for students of all ages. The program was offered for two hours on Thursdays while public schools were m sess10n. During the fall of 2002

25 Huntington Community Center in Old Town Bowie received funding to offer free tutoring services four days per week. City resources (volunteers and materials) were redirected to support their tutoring program. The City does offer other outreach services to the community, however. These services include:

Help Increase the Peace Program, HIPP, is a program that empowers youth to reduce violence and strengthen cross-racial and cross-cultural understanding. In cooperation with Bowie High School, BYFS conducts basic and advanced workshops. Students are trained to become group facilitators.

Decision-making and Diversity for Sixth Graders began as a pilot program in 2000 and is now being offered in two elementary schools. BYFS staff works in the schools with the school counselors and conducts six-week groups for small groups of sixth graders. By the end of the academic year, all sixth graders in these schools will have participated in this program.

Maryland Student Assistance Program is a Prince George's County School Board program. BYFS staff was instrumental in establishing this worthy endeavor in Bowie High School and Benjamin Tasker Middle School. Students who may be at risk for drug or alcohol abuse are reported to a committee within the school. After ascertaining that a problem may exist and getting parental approval, BYFS staff assesses the student for substance use. Referrals and treatment recommendations are then made to the parents.

Youth and Family Services

The Bowie Youth Services Bureau, (BYFS), is jointly sponsored by the State of Maryland, Prince George's County, and the City of Bowie. The primary goals are to promote youth development, prevent juvenile delinquency, and reduce family tension and conflict. The staff provides direct services in formal counseling (family, group and individual), information and referral, informal counseling, crisis intervention, suicide intervention, substance abuse prevention, community consultation, drug and alcohol-free events, school intervention programs, and court and school liaison. Services and programs offered are:

26 Counseling

• Family Counseling • Parenting Education Groups • Groups for Parents & Children Groups for Teens • Educational/Support Group

Outreach Programs

• Drug/Alcohol-free Community Events • Teen Mentoring Program • School Collaboration

Information & Referral

• Teen Job Bank • Community Resources and Referrals

Crisis Intervention

• Suicide Intervention • Child Abuse

The total BYFS operating budget is $818,800. A matching state grant of $113,365 and approximately $20,000 come from other grant sources. All counseling services are confidential and provided on a cost-free basis. However, the City has adopted a fee schedule, which would be implemented only if state matching funds fall below $100,000.

FY0 7 N umber of a dults receiv ing co unseling 199 N umber of youth r eceivi ng counseling 23 5 T o ta l numb e r of fo rma l counseling cases 43 4 Pe rso ns recei v ing info rm a l coun seling 253 Pe rso ns recei vi ng referra ls 373 Pe rson s receivi ng s u ic ide/ c ri sis inte r venti o n 69 Pe rson s receiv ing s ubs ta nce a buse assess . / referra l 13 7 N umb er of groups/ wo rks h o p s conduc t ed in office 0 Pe rson s served in groups/ works ho p s in office 0 N umb er of groups/ wo rks h o p s in sc hoo ls 144 3 Youth ser ved in group/ wo r ks h o ps in sc hoo ls 308 N umbe r of a lcoh o l/ drug-free events fo r youth 0 Yo uth ser ved in a lcoh o l/ drug-free events 0

To enhance the City' s mission to children and their families, BYFS staff is involved in numerous outreach programs. These programs include:

27 The Community Prevention Network

Involving many facets of the greater Bowie community, this group was developed to meet and shape projects, plus share ideas on how our community can best meet the needs of our youth. This is an evolving group and all community members, including parents, businesses, civic organizations, schools and religious leaders, are encouraged to participate.

BYFS also facilitates group sessions as the need arises and there is sufficient interest from the community.

Active Parenting Educational groups for parents with children of different ages -- toddlers, 6- to 12-year-olds, and teenagers. The focus is on learning practical skills to develop self-esteem, cooperation and responsibility in their children. Parents learn to improve communication with their children and practice new approaches to discipline.

"My Family and Me" Separation/Divorce Two simultaneous groups to help parents and their children, ages 6Yi - 11 , through the separation and/or divorce process. The adult group explores solutions to common problems and is given an opportunity to learn active listening and problem-solving techniques. Children learn to identify feelings and thoughts using games, crafts, discussion, and other activities, helping them develop ways to handle the transition.

ADHD Education Two simultaneous groups focus on the "art of survival" when a child has a diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder, with or without hyperactivity - one for parents and a separate group for the child. Adults learn about ADHD, new ways to help their child, and how the disorder in a child affects the whole family. The children' s group focuses on the improvement of social skills.

Girls Count An exploration for teen girls to learn how to nurture their true selves, share ideas about everyday issues, and learn about making important choices and decisions. Each eight-week session focuses on a theme such as self image, assertiveness, decision-making, peer pressures, etc.

Parenting Through Play This group helps children ages 2 - 10, cooperate more and have more confidence. This parent/child group focuses on strengthening their bond through play. Parents learn to help their children increase self-esteem, express themselves effectively, and cooperate in new ways in a safe and nurturing environment.

28 Existing Essential Human Services and0------Other Amenities in Bowie2..11~ ,

Legen

Nursing Homes • Senior Ho using l'3 • Bowe Health a Shopping Centers Center * Fire Stations d Churches Bowe Serior Center • .t Schools l'3 L) Recreation Centers Trails -- Primary Roads ~ Metro Bus Stops d • Metro Bus Routes City Parks

Old Town Bowie

City of Bowie

-Data Smrces: MNCPPC & The C~y of Bowe. - Prepsred by The City of Bowe lnfcrmation Technology Department. - Al I data is offered as is and Vlilhout any actual or implied wmanty as to acruracy. - Date: March, 2003 - c: ~i sstufflaran ap _JJ'Ojects\essnserv m xd

29 30 Accessibility

The City of Bowie was asked to participate in the Civic Access Review in 2000, by the United States Department of Justice, on the 10th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). City-owned facilities where public programming was offered were inspected for compliance with ADA. Recommendations were made and the City has implemented those modifications to the municipal facilities cited. A subsequent follow up review was conducted in 2002 to assure ADA compliance. No additional recommendations were offered to the City by the Justice Department on that occasion, as inspected sites met all basic requirements for program accessibility.

Although it was not required by the Justice Department, the City of Bowie installed approximately 600 ADA ramps throughout the City to further assure handicap accessibility to City streets and sidewalks.

William Levitt, as mentioned previously, was a developer who very efficiently constructed post World War II tract housing in the 1960's. Many of the Levitt homes built north of Route 50 were one-story structures making them easily accessible to people with orthopedic disabilities. South of Route 50 also includes some Levitt built homes. However, most new development in this area happened within the last twenty years, the majority of which has occurred specifically in the last five years, assuring ADA compliance. The older, and in some cases historic, homes in Old Town Bowie, many of which are two story Victorian houses, do not generally meet ADA standards.

Historic Preservation

The City of Bowie has invested in preserving its cultural resources and now operates five historic museums, one of which is the Bowie Railroad Museum. The circa 1910 Pennsylvania Railroad depot, control tower and passenger shelter are joined by a 1922 Norfolk & Western Railroad caboose to portray Bowie's rail history. Together, they comprise the Bowie Railroad Station Museum. The Bowie Railroad Station Museum has new exhibit panels planned. They will detail the homes, schools, businesses, and churches of Old Town Bowie, as well as panels relating to the Bowie Race Track, Bowie State University, the railroad, and the Washington, Baltimore, & Annapolis trolley.

Four City-owned properties have Maryland Historic Trust Preservation Easements. The Bowie Railroad Museum is one of these protected historic properties. Belair Mansion, the restored plantation home of the colonial Governor Samuel Ogle, is another. The City of Bowie acquired the Belair Stables in 1968, and has invested $700,000, ($40,000 of which is State funding), restoring the historic building to be used as the Maryland Thoroughbred Racing Museum. In 1985, the City purchased the Harmel House in an effort to prevent development. Originally, the house served as the storekeeper's residence. Today, the facility operates as a Radio and T.V. History Museum through a cooperative agreement with the Radio History Society, Inc.

The City has also created a Historic Town of Bowie Self Guided Tour map, which included locations and descriptions of 42 historic properties in Old Town Bowie. There are nine historic sites within Bowie on the State's registry for historic sites. As 31 development seems to be the main threat to historic sites in the area, acquiring such national and state designation is vital to historic preservation.

There are several citizen advisory groups, which participate in guiding the City's Museums Division. Huntington Heritage Society, Friends of Belair Estate, and Historic Old Bowie Merchants Association (HOBMA) and the Revitalization Committee have been invaluable to the preservation of these historic properties.

Economic Development

Commercial Rehabilitation

The City's need for commercial rehabilitation is mainly in Old Town Bowie. Old Town Bowie has suffered economic decline since its boom at the tum of the twentieth century. It is an older urban neighborhood that has fallen into disrepair, as well as economic stagnation. Although it has potential to be a vibrant place to live and work, there are serious obstacles to the redevelopment of Old Town Bowie.

The mass of the City's population is located three miles southeast of Old Town Bowie. The residents of Old Town Bowie are connected to the City only by a geographic "umbilical cord". Although, Old Town Bowie was once the center of commerce and social activity, it is now virtually a satellite community, separated from the City, connected to the rest of the City by only a roadway. Furthermore, the MARC station was relocated to Bowie State University a few miles away. This has contributed significantly to the drastic decline in the community's vitality.

However, since the city became an Entitlement Community in September 2003, CDBG and other resources have helped to revitalize the community and bring new businesses, new investments, and improved vehicular and pedestrian mobility. Property values in Old Town Bowie have improved. Properties that had shown signs of neglect have been restored through a City-run grant program for fa<;ade improvements. Real estate transactions have increased and several commercial properties have been sold.

The City has invested over $900,000 in grant funds in the Old Town Bowie community in the past four years. These funds are in addition to the CDBG funds provided by HUD which were spent on infrastructure improvements (street paving, curb & gutter construction, and sidewalk construction). These infrastructure improvements have significantly reduced the stormwater drainage problems in the community. Most of these grant funds were provided by the Maryland Department of Housing Department of Housing and Community Development, Community Legacy Program. The projects covered activities such as

New decorative/ornate street signs Trail construction New commercial area parking lot

32 Studies on trail linkages between the community and the local State college (Bowie State University) New decorative curb cuts

The City has introduced several financial incentive programs intended to address the visual appearances of properties in Old Town Bowie. Please refer to the Grants and Loans section below for more detail on these programs.

There are approximately thirty property owners in the commercial district. The City, State, County and other public entities own much of the study area including the City park, the County owned community center and fire station, including significant State Highway Administration, (SHA) holdings around the bridge. Much of the land is in the form of unimproved rights of way for roads laid out in the original plat. It is important to note that Old Town Bowie has rather confused records on lot boundaries due to conflicting plats used during the initial improvements and sales. Ownership and property lines will need to be carefully investigated during revitalization.

A high percentage of the original lots and roads remain undeveloped, some due to water drainage issues. Many landholders own several land parcels that have been clustered together to make a larger unit, providing easier assembly of parcels for larger developments as well as opportunities for infill development in lower density areas. Parcels along the south side of Ninth Street were not divided into long, narrow lots. Instead, they vary greatly in size. Many have small buildings sited near the street edge with empty land behind. Vacant land within block interiors provides opportunities for parking and pedestrian-oriented alley shopping.

Capital Improvements for Commercial Property

The City has recently initiated two new funding opportumtles intended to facilitate the much needed capital improvements for commercial properties in Old Town Bowie: the Old Town Bowie Fac;ade Program and the Old Town Bowie Loan Program. Please refer to Grants and Loan section below for more details.

Small Business Development

A workforce Partnership Network has been formed to coordinate all of the employment and training opportunities offered through community colleges, government agencies and nonprofit organizations in the County.

The Workforce Services Corporation (previously the Private Industry Council) is the primary service provider with offices located in Landover. Services include:

• Vocational training • GED Training • Job readiness training and counseling • Access to information about job openings

33 • Training programs for specific retailers including CVS, Giant Food and Safeway • Employment Referral

The City works with the Workforce Services Corporation (WSC) to provide business referrals for job placements of Welfare-to-Work clients. Through the leveraging of resources and collaborations in the public and private sectors, WSC also offers affordable housing, dental care, clothing and metal health counseling in addition to jobs and training.

34 Grants and Loans

The City provides multiple financial incentives and technical assistance for small business development and increased economic vitality in Old Town Bowie, as well as through the City. These programs include:

Small Business Growth Fund:

The Financial Services Corporation administers the Small Businesses Growth Fund. The fund provides financial assistance to for-profit companies with 25 or fewer employees. It was designed primarily to assist existing businesses in their expansion efforts. Start-up businesses are considered on a case-by-case basis. Loan amounts range from $25,000 to $250,000 and are guaranteed by the United States Small Business Administration under its 7 (a) program.

Small Business Association 504 Loan Program:

The Small Business Association, (SBA), Washington Metropolitan Area District Office, has implemented a new marketing initiative under SBA's Community Express and SBAExpress loan guaranty programs. This initiative combines financial and technical assistance to enable small and home-based business owners to access business loans instead of consumer loans. Participants in this program receive training on completing a loan application during these sessions. This program provides existing, viable small businesses with long-term below market rate financing for the acquisition of land and buildings, machinery and equipment, construction and renovation which result in job creation.

The Prince George's County Financial Services Corporation administers this program and determines the ability of small business to secure and repay loan proceeds. Only creditworthy firms are eligible for assistance under the 504-loan program.

Old Town Bowie Facade Grant Program:

Recognizing that visual and aesthetic improvements are the basis for enhancing Old Town Bowie's marketability and viability as a commercial center, the City of Bowie developed and now implements the Old Town Bowie Fa9ade Grant Program. This matching grant program is for business owners or property owners in the Revitalization Plan Area, as designated in the September 1999 Master Plan for Redevelopment of Old Town Bowie, to do facade improvement work. The City has prepared a list of owners eligible for the program. Owners who are subject to an Order of Abatement issued by the District Court in connection with the

35 issuance of municipal infractions issued by a City of Bowie or Prince George's County Code Compliance Officer are NOT eligible for a matching grant.

The desired visual qualities this program hopes to achieve in the revitalized Old Town Bowie will accentuate the current architectural style of the existing building, and recreate the positive visual qualities of Huntington, the railroad town of the 1880's through the 1920's in the design and construction of new buildings.

For the purposes of this Old Town Bowie program, fa<;ade is defined as any part of the exterior of a building or its grounds that is visible to someone looking from outside the building or grounds. Fa9ade components include the visible exterior elements that affect perception by the viewer, such as fundamental architectural details (e.g. siding, trim, moldings, windows and doors, etc.), secondary details (such as shutters, awnings, signage, etc.), finish treatments (such as paint, stucco or brick veneer, etc.), landscaping elements of an enduring nature (such as ornamental fencing, planter boxes, etc.), and any other design or functional element as approved by the consultant.

The City will provide limited architectural consultant services to each building owner or business owner to ensure the owners' ideas and plans fit with the overall design theme for Old Town Bowie.

Old Town Bowie Grants and Loan Program:

This grants and loan program is for business owners or property owners in the Revitalization Plan Area, as designated in the September 1999 Master Plan for Redevelopment of Old Town Bowie. The City will prepare a list of owners eligible for the program.

The City will provide limited architectural consultant services to each building owner or business owner to ensure the owners' ideas and plans fit with the overall design theme for Old Town Bowie.

Loan applications will be accepted from owners to fund exterior improvements to commercial buildings consistent with an approved design theme when the cost exceeds $10,000 or when the owner does not have the money needed for a matching grant; to fund interior improvements to commercial buildings; to fund reconstruction or remodeling of existing commercial buildings consistent with an approved visual design theme; or, to fund construction of new commercial buildings consistent with an approved design theme.

36 For both grant programs, the property owner is responsible for having the work done. A business owner must have the written permission of the property owner to do the work.

Entrepreneurs hip Pro gram:

The Entrepreneurship Program is a partnership between the Capitol Region Small Business Development Center and the City of Bowie to provide training for citizens who operate small businesses or who want to start their own business. Two components currently exist: a monthly SBDC Day and a twice a month Small Office/Home Office (SOHO) Loan Initiative information and training sessions.

"Smart Start - Entrepreneur 101 " is an informative class that has been developed to help the budding entrepreneur in Bowie understand all the "in's and out's" of starting a new business venture. An attorney, accountant, SBDC counselor and SBA representative provide a wealth of information to help participants understand such topics as: the legal forms of business structure, how to register a business in the State of Maryland, accounting considerations and what lenders look for when applying for a loan. Valuable business resources are also introduced to help the entrepreneur get started. The SBDC conducts a business plan workshop at no charge to the business owner. The workshop provides professional guidance on developing a plan that gets results.

Technical Assistance:

The Workforce Services Corporation provides job readiness training and counseling. The Financing and Business Assistance Division of the Prince George's County Economic Development Corporation help entrepreneurs use Angel Capital Electronic Network online service. The Angel Capital Electronic Network is an Internet-based securities listing service that makes it possible for small business owners to identify investors of equity financing in the $250,000 to $3 million range. Entrepreneurs can reach accredited investors ( called "angels") with a net worth exceeding $1 million or annual income greater than $200,000. The Financing and Business Assistance Division of the Prince George's County Economic Development Corporation help entrepreneurs use the online service and register for the program.

37 Institutional Structure

City Manager's Office will be responsible for overall program compliance to federal CDBG regulations. The City of Bowie's Department of Community Services will provide linkages to the senior citizen community since it operates the City's state-of-the-art Senior Center. The City's Finance Department will conduct the financial management of the CDBG funds. The Grants & CDBG Administrator, under direct supervision of the City Manager's Office, will complete required evaluation reporting, and ensure overall project compliance with the Approved Citizen Participation Plan, the Approved Consolidated Plan, and federal regulations.

All capital projects conducted by the City of Bowie are also in compliance with local codes, ordinances, master plans, and community development guidelines as indicated below.

Energy Efficiency

The City of Bowie complies with the Maryland Building Rehabilitation Code, called "Smart Codes" which encourages investment in existing neighborhoods through the rehabilitation and reuse of existing buildings. The Smart Codes Program is a component of Maryland's Smart Growth initiative that focuses on the new Maryland Building Rehabilitation Code, which establishes the constructions code requirements for work on buildings over one year old, renovations, and historic preservation. Existing historic preservation standards already incorporate considerations for authenticity as well as environmental concerns, especially in regards to the removal of lead paint. A more environmentally conscious approach to design and construction is encouraged through these established Smart Codes.

The City of Bowie is committed to identifying, conducting, and promoting energy conservation, and the utilization of renewable energy where and whenever feasible as is evident through the recent partnership with Maryland Energy Administration in the Rebuild America Program. In order to further emphasize the City's commitment to resource conservation, the City Council adopted an innovative policy (Resolution 15-03) which requires all municipal construction, renovation, and deconstruction projects to incorporate sustainable development principles and practices whenever feasible. The federal and state governments have adopted similar legislation. City staff will continue to promote energy efficiency through public demonstration projects and workshops, as well as through the development of a Sustainable Development page on the City's web site.

Through the adoption of Resolution 15-03, the first few capital improvement projects which the City conducts will invariably serve as highly visible demonstration projects modeling renewable energy usage, Sustainable Design and "Green" Construction, Low Impact Development (LID) as an alternative to storm water management ponds, and Conservation Landscaping. The City will work in collaboration with zoning officials to revise the existing building codes to allow

38 for feasibility of similar projects that may encourage small residential projects as well as large-scale projects implemented by developers.

The City received a special grant from OpenDoor Housing Fund to encourage the use of "Energy Efficient" resources and "Green" technologies in the senior housing rehabilitation program.

Lead-Based Paint Hazards

The City of Bowie performs all historic preservation and renovation in accordance to Maryland Building Rehabilitation Code and preservation standards. As the City owns and operates five historic museums, one of which is located in Old Town Bowie, such capital improvements happen regularly.

The City contains 397 housing units constructed prior to 1960. Prior to 1958, when the Belair Estate was annexed, the City consisted only of Old Town Bowie. Between 1960 and 1970, 8,040 new homes were constructed, the majority of which were Levitt homes. Therefore, the majority of lead paint hazards would be found in the 397 older homes of Old Town Bowie. According to census data, there is a concentration of low-moderate and very low-income families living in Old Town Bowie. It is furthered estimated that the majority of residents living in these older homes are long time residents who are now elderly, rather than children.

The County has established a broad-based community effort to ameliorate health risks associated with lead-based paint hazards. Some very low-income families with children are living in 30 to 40-year-old housing and are the most vulnerable to lead hazards. The County has identified three target areas for a concentrated lead-based paint reduction program over the next several years. Bowie is not one of these target areas. There are other programs addressing lead paint hazards to which City staff may refer residents. These agencies include: the Maryland Department of Environmental Resources, Maryland Department of Environment, Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development, and the National Center for Lead Safe Housing.

Code Enforcement

As a governmental agency, the City of Bowie encourages the implementation of building codes that promote Smart Growth initiatives by incorporating environmentally sensitive, "green" design, methods, or materials into the re/development review process. This commitment is evident in the Bowie Development Review Guidelines, and the City's Environmental Wildlife Habitat Management Guidelines. These City documents are in line with Prince George's County's Preliminary General Plan, the Department of Environmental Resources' Total Water Management Technical Report, and the Chesapeake Bay 2000 Agreement.

39 Although much of Bowie, due to its demographics, does not qualify for many of the Smart Growth initiatives, it has participated in programs for which it qualified. Rte 450 Main Street is a phased project that was initiated under Main Street Maryland. Through the Neighborhood Business Development Program, Old Town Bowie was one location within City limits designated to qualify. The City of Bowie has applied previously through the TEA-21 program, as well as Maryland Department of Transportation's Recreation Trails Program, for sidewalk retrofit projects for Old Town Bowie.

Bowie's Office of Code Compliance, which inspects rental property annually, has not identify any rental housing units in Bowie as structurally unsound or unfit for human habitation. The historic Old Town Bowie, however, is the area most likely in need of property rehabilitation, as many properties show obvious signs of neglect, and many may not meet current building, or health and safety codes.

Planning

The City of Bowie does not control major land use, zoning, subdivision, or site plan decisions within its municipal boundaries, as this authority is given to Prince George's County under the State of Maryland's Regional District Act. A Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (MNCPPC), the agency that administers planning and zoning regulations in Prince George's County, gives the City the right to review and comment on all major development applications within the City limits, as well as the areas within one mile of the City limits. The City does, however, have authority to review and act on departures and variances from the Prince George's County Zoning Ordinance for projects within the City limits. The Prince George's County Council granted this authority to the City in October 1998.

The following plans identify needs and provide guidance for the Bowie area's growth and development: The 1991 Bowie-Collington-Mitchellville and Vicinity Area Master Plan; the County General Plan; the County Biennial Growth Plan; the County Public Safety Master Plan; the County Master Plan of Transportation; the County Historic Sites and Districts Plan. In addition, the City's own principal planning documents include: City Development Review Guidelines and Policies; Forest Mitigation Sites Inventory and Policies; Environmental Wildlife Habitat Guidelines; Citywide Trails Plan; Senior Housing Study; Master Plan for the Redevelopment of Old Town Bowie; and, Recreation Master Plan. The City also conducts an annual assessment of transportation needs and priorities, which are documented in the Transportation Priority List.

The City of Bowie has, for years, exhibited exemplary efforts in promoting Smart Growth Initiatives by implementing and/or supporting preservation, conservation, mitigation and restoration initiatives. In 1989, as a neighboring municipality, the City endorsed the federal level land transfer and acquisition by the United States Department of the Interior for 9,000 surplus acres from the Department of Defense. As a result of the federal land transfer, the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center included the land in their holdings, primarily for purposes of wildlife

40 habitat preservation and research. The Patuxent Wildlife Research Center recently worked in partnership with the City of Bowie in order to map wildlife species and habitats in and around the City. Scientists provided the City's Information Technology Department wildlife data that in conjunction with City's data was used to create GIS maps. This information will be used to depict trends and species density. The lab does not have the resources or expertise to map this information. This project is still in process.

In 1992, the City received the Maryland Municipal League (MML) Award for Excellence for its Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) Program participation. The City's Waste Water Treatment Plant was the first in the nation to serve as the testing ground for scientists from Virginia Polytechnic Institute, eager to use the BNR technology. In the mid-1990's, the City participated in the Patuxent Estuary Demonstration (PED) grant, administered by the Patuxent River Commission, and staff from the Maryland Departments of the Environment (MDE) and Planning (MDOP). A Citywide public awareness campaign was conducted to make residents aware of non-point pollution sources and their impact on the Patuxent River's water quality. The City's participation in the PED grant resulted in the conversion of a passive park site into Quiet Meadow Park, an "Environmental Demonstration Area."

Also in the mid-1990's, the City entered into a three public agency partnership with the State of Maryland Department of Natural Resources (MNDR) and the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC) to acquire the 500+ acre Seton Belt Woods property, immediately adjacent to the City of Bowie. Public acquisition of the pristine Seton Belt Woods property is a prime example of the City's commitment to the preservation of wildlife habitat for endangered species and ecosystems. The City invested $500,000 in the public acquisition process. Since the site was publicly acquired, it has been designated by the State of Maryland as a 'Wild/ands' site, and recently identified as a 'hub' in the State's "Greenprint" Program.

In the mid-to late 1990's the City was involved in reviewing the M-NCPPC's Patuxent Rural Legacy Program. The City commented on the M-NCPPC program proposal to the State of Maryland, from a two-pronged approach: first, as a neighboring municipality in close proximity to the Patuxent Rural Legacy Program area; and second, as a property owner within the then proposed rural legacy program area. The City provided a position in support of the M-NCPPC program proposal.

In 1997, the inaugural year of the Chesapeake Bay Partner Community Program, the City was one of four local jurisdictions across the State of Maryland to receive the Chesapeake Bay Partner Community Gold Award for its outstanding conservation programs. Award-winning communities had to demonstrate environmental initiatives, and program participation was based on population size. Since the City received this distinction, the City Council has adopted a Forest Mitigation Policies and City-owned Sites Inventory, intended to complement both the Maryland Forest Conservation Act (FCA) and the Prince George's County Woodland Conservation/Tree Preservation Ordinance.

41 In 1998, the City was awarded a grant from the Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay in their Small Watershed Restoration Program. The City established a public partnership with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Chesapeake Bay Field Office) BayScapes Program staff. The City conducted an awareness campaign about the importance of using native plants in the landscape. The campaign focused on the environmental benefits of conservation landscaping techniques to Bowie residents, local businesses and the development community. BayScapes demonstration gardens were planted behind City Hall to serve as a model for others. As a result of the City's participation with BayScapes, the City later participated in the Celebration 2000 Program. Shortly after the construction and opening of the City's Senior Center, a MaryLandscapes garden was planted at the site, to further promote the use of native plants across the state.

The City was a full participant in and strong supporter of the Commission 2000 Task Force and its recommendations that developed a framework for limiting and directing growth in Prince George's County. This will direct growth to designated "centers, corridors and redevelopment areas" and severely restrict growth from existing rural areas and environmentally sensitive areas.

Non-Housing Community and Economic Development Priorities

The goal of all Bowie community development activities is to enhance the living environment and expand economic opportunities for residents. The non-housing and economic development priorities of the City's population, as expressed in the City's recent survey of all households and businesses are as follows:

Communities Facilities Improvements

Youth Centers 76% Parks & Recreation Facilities 75% Senior Center 73%

Community Services

Crime Awareness/Prevention 88% Medical Services 82% Senior Services 81% Youth Services 81%

Infrastructure and Public improvements

Street Improvements 83% Streetlights 79% Sidewalks 77%

42 Economic Development

Job Training and Job Placement Services 71% Rehab of Older Commercial Buildings 70% Loans to Business 62%

Homeless Facilities and Services

Emergency Food & Clothing 71% Employment Training for the Homeless 70% Substance Abuse Treatment 68%

The City addresses these needs through its budget process on an annual basis and prioritizes the implementation of specific projects based on need and available funds. This year the City has approved the largest budget in its history to accommodate the requirements of a new Police Department (Crime Awareness/Prevention was No.l on the citizen's "High Need" list resulting from the survey), a new City Hall, increases in energy prices, and the cost of other government services.

43 Non-Housing Community and Economic Development Strategy

In 1999, the City of Bowie adopted the Master Plan for Redevelopment of Old Town Bowie that addresses the community economic stagnation, and present actions which the City can contribute to the revitalization of Old Town Bowie. Subsequently, the City initiated sidewalk, curb, and gutter installation. A new traffic plan was developed and sent to Maryland State Highway Administration (SHA) for their review. The "Amtrak" lot was paved and landscaped, and ornamental lighting was installed. The local park has undergone improvements as well. Recently, the City of Bowie installed decorative streetlights, provided local businesses with promotional flags, and erected banners along the main traffic corridor in Old Town Bowie. Ongoing funding is made available for festivals and holiday events promoting the area. The Bowie Railroad Museum is being expanded.

Strategic Vision for Change

Bowie adopted the updated Development Review Guidelines and Policies: Standards for Creating a Quality Living Environment in 2002. This document has been reviewed and amended several times in the last decade. Several factors contributed to the need for the City to have such guidelines. Rapid growth, an outdated Bowie-Collington-Mitchellville and Vicinity Area Master Plan (1970), (referred to as the Master Plan), and the City Council's limited ability to regulate development due to the lack of planning and zoning authority within its jurisdiction gave rise to the need for development policies that guide growth within and around the City. The original Bowie Development Policies document (1989) was formulated after many hours of deliberation and Council consideration of direct input from area residents, and was used as the framework for the City's position in the updating of the Bowie-Collington-Mitchellville and Vicinity Area Master Plan in 1991. Since that time, the guidelines have been updated several times, with the last formal update occurring in 1999. City staff is currently participating in the revision of the Bowie-Collington-Mitchellville and Vicinity Area Master Plan.

The major goal of the Development Review Guidelines and Policies is to encourage and promote a carefully planned community and sensitively designed development sites. The guidelines and policies seek to discourage unwelcome development that might ruin the open space and quality of life enjoyed by residents. Bowie's Development Review Guidelines and Policies are intended to:

• Encourage an equitable distribution of well-designed and efficient development which reflects appropriate relationships between land uses, continuity between neighborhoods, availability of public facilities, and a sensitivity to the natural environment;

44 • Enhance the environment and provide guidance for site development within, and immediately adjacent to, the City; and

• Promote orderly, quality development and a higher quality of life for the citizens of Bowie and its surrounding areas.

These guidelines and policies work in conjunction with County laws governing development, the 1991 Master Plan, the Bowie Advisory Planning Board, as well as valued citizen input, to promote the best possible development for Bowie's future. All proposals are subject to a Public Stakeholders Meeting, which not only provides the developer an opportunity to discuss the proposal in general, but also provides for very early input from Bowie residents.

An effort to integrate economic, physical, environmental, community, and human development, the City's Guidelines provide information on Residential, Commercial, Environmental, and Transportation development issues. Site Design is the process by which the principles and standards of good planning are put into practice. The bulk of the City's development review policies deal with design considerations. In many cases, the guidelines used by the City in the past have become County standards or regulations (e.g. townhouse standards). It is important to have a balanced, reasonable set of standards to describe what the community wants itself to look like and to guide prospective builders and developers, including builders of public and civic buildings, in site layout and design. Residential development makes up the largest single land use category in the City. In fact, the City is well known for its reputation as a bedroom suburb of Washington D.C. As the City becomes more diverse, its housing needs are also changing. It is important to provide a wide range of housing opportunities in the community and to guarantee that new subdivisions are designed with an identity and can be integrated into the City's existing neighborhoods. Residential land use policies not only address the provision of housing, but also give guidance on how residential projects should develop.

The environment is one of our most precious resources. Without proper guidance and management, development sprawl can overcome and destroy the community's irreplaceable natural assets. Monitoring natural ecosystems, such as 100-year floodplain, steep slopes, wetlands, and critical habitat areas on a watershed wide basis, establishment of performance standards, and preservation of significant open space and forested lands through conservation efforts demonstrate a commitment to the protection and enhancement of the natural environment. As development is inherently detrimental to environmental protection, the Bowie Guidelines address specific environmental concerns and objectives. For instance, new, planned residential neighborhoods should have landscape plans associated with their monumental entrances and overall sites that include the provision of a minimum of 80% native plants in their plant schedules. When practical and applicable, these thresholds should be exceeded for the preservation/conservation of high priority forest areas, including specimen trees

45 and areas of critical habitat, rather than the minimum threshold being met. Trees of national or historical significance, including Champion trees, should be considered a high priority for retention. In this process, preservation/conservation thresholds should preferably be met on-site. To further ensure environmental protection within City limits, the City developed and adopted the Wildlife Habitat Management Guidelines in November of 2001.

The area's transportation system is one of the most critical elements of infrastructure needed to sustain the quality of life as well as accommodate growth and development both within the City and in the region. The transportation needs of the planning area are multi-modal. Regional access must be facilitated, but not to the detriment of existing or planned neighborhoods. Overall transportation systems planning and adherence to sound engineering principles should guide review of development proposals to ensure safe and efficient access and circulation. Disruptive impacts of future improvements to the existing transportation network and quality of life should be minimized. The integrity of non-highway transportation facilities must be protected and enhanced. The City's transportation guidelines pertain mainly to crosswalks, street lighting, median landscaping, and sidewalks with primary focus on noise and light pollution reduction, public safety, and community beatification. These measures provide residential, recreational, and commercial areas that are attractive, inviting, and functioning communities within the City.

The City provides and maintains recreation facilities and parks for its residents. These facilities are in addition to, and not a substitute for, those facilities needed by the community, which are provided by Maryland National-Capital Park and Planning Commission, (M-NCPPC). Having a wide variety of recreational opportunities for all age groups and providing parkland for passive recreation or open space preservation adds significantly to the quality of life and attractiveness of the City.

Furthermore, the City's Adequate Public Facilities Policies supports adequate public facilities (APF) laws in Prince George's County. The timely provision of necessary facilities programmed in the County's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or State's Consolidated Transportation Program (CTP), or those funded by developers in accordance with the County's adequate public facilities ordinance, is essential to keeping pace with growth in the community. According to City policies, 100% of the construction funding for such facilities should be committed for a facility to be considered in any APF test, and projects should be staged to coincide with the actual availability of the services those facilities provide.

Public water and sewer facilities are essential to support new growth, as well as the needs of existing development. The City operates its own wastewater treatment plant and water system within the Levitt sections of Bowie. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, (WSSC), provides such services elsewhere. The Prince George 's County Ten-Year Water and Sewer Plan is a development management tool, which establishes a timing mechanism for

46 providing such service within the County to assure that water, and sewer facilities are not overburdened. Amendments to the Plan must be approved to initiate project development dependent upon public water and sewer facilities. The City makes recommendations on proposed amendments, based upon the City's development review policies, the Master Plan, and County criteria. The provision of public water and sewer greatly influences the development character of an area.

Anti-Poverty Strategy

The key to the City's anti-poverty strategy is job creation through the promotion of economic development activities. By working with the growing number of commercial developers in the City, Bowie is enhancing job opportunities and housing for all economic levels. The growing number of businesses in the city makes it a more attractive and livable place to raise a family. With completion of the Bowie Town Center, the City has become a major employer within the County and State with the addition of 1,100 retail jobs alone. The Federal Commercial Building Loan Fund, administered through the County's Redevelopment Authority, created 57 jobs with the development of a nearby Honda dealership. The City also sponsors seasonal job fairs, offering employment opportunities for persons interested in parks and recreation.

The City encourages coordination with programs and services with a number of County, State and local organizations:

• The County's Financial Services Corporation (FSC), a private non profit corporation affiliated with the Economic Development Corporation that provides financial assistance to businesses, and administers the Small Business Growth Fund and the Small Business Administration 504 Loan Program.

• The County's Workforce Development Partnership, addressing the workforce development needs of existing and potential employers. It represents collaboration among the University of Maryland at College Park, Prince George's Community College and the Prince George's County Public Schools.

• Bowie State University, a leader in seeking HUD funds for Historically Black Colleges and University to enhance its entrepreneurship programs, developing capacity among small business owners, non-profit and housing advocates. Bowie State University also works with communities around the County, including the City, to establish small business information centers at local libraries in collaboration with the Economic Development Corporation and the County library system.

47 • Organizations that sponsor community forums on issues related to revitalization and community needs.

Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy

The entire City is a Priority Funding Area, and Old Town Bowie and the commercial district along Main Street/Rte 450 are Designated Neighborhoods as determined by the State of Maryland's economic development programs.

The City of Bowie has embarked on a comprehensive plan for economic development and revitalization in the Old Town Bowie area. Revitalization goals for Old Town Bowie are: to expand employment opportunities for residents, retain and expand established businesses, attract new businesses, and achieve higher rates of entrepreneurship. The plan represents a collaborative effort between the public and private sectors, including residents, government representatives, business owners, and nonprofit community-based organization. The strategy will create greater private sector employment, retain and strengthen existing commercial businesses, and make better use of excess commercial space.

The Bowie Hiker/Biker Trails Master Plan recommends several trail linkages in Old Town Bowie. It has long been staffs desire to see a City trail linkage to the Washington, Baltimore, and Annapolis Trail, (WB&A). This would further assist implementation of the County, and State's trail plan.

Also proposed is the establishment of a Development District Overlay Zone, (DDOZ). This legislation would provide flexible parking requirements for new business that are unable to accommodate on-site parking required by the County Zoning Ordinance. In addition, the DDOZ would also define architectural guidelines for infill development.

While it will never again be the center of city life it once was for Bowie, Old Town Bowie's unique history, scale, and character provide it with many opportunities to reestablish itself as a distinctive, attractive village center positioned in the middle of a dynamic and growing region. It has remained a small intact village surrounded by sprawling suburbia. At a time when neo traditional neighborhood design is gaining popularity, Old Town Bowie's quaint small-town design provides the opportunity for the City of Bowie to restore its economic viability as an attractive destination. The Victorian architecture and village layout is conducive to creating a charming, pedestrian friendly main street style-shopping district. Old Town Bowie represents a prime opportunity for urban neighborhood redevelopment.

Several initiatives and programs in the City promote economic development and revitalization. The strategy is to direct services and incentives to stabilize the community and attract new investment. Economic development projects are aimed at the already existing focus areas of Old Town Bowie, the Rte 450 "Main Street" corridor, and the Maryland Science and Technology Center (MSTC). The

48 incentive programs that have been developed by the City to encourage redevelopment in Old Town Bowie consist of: the Old Town Bowie Fa9ade Grant Program, the Commercial Building Loan Fund, the Small Business Growth Fund, the Small Business Association-504 Loan Program, ( described in the Grants and Loan section above). The Prince George's County High Technology Growth and Development Incentive Package, Job Training and Placement Services, and the Angel Capital Electronic Network Program were also resources mentioned previously.

Prince George's County High Technology Growth and Development Incentive Package

Prince George's County has about 900 high technology companies that employ more than 33,500 highly trained workers. Most of these companies are located in the Prince George's County High Technology Triangle, in the northern half of the County. The County designed an incentive package to encourage the private sector to relocate within the Triangle.

The incentive package consists of:

o Real Property Tax Credit: The tax credit may be granted on real property constructed or substantially improved by, or for expanding or relocation, high technology companies. The credit decreases over five years.

o Personal Property Tax Exemption: Companies are offered a 100 percent tax exemption from personal property tax for certain property used in research and development.

o Fast-Track Commitment: The County offers a "Fast-Track Site Development Plan Process" which expedites approval of site development plans for qualified high technology projects.

Non-Housing Community Development Objectives

Proactive economic development assumes a strategy that provides a suitable living environment for residents of all income levels and ethnic backgrounds. The City has established that street infrastructure improvements in Old Town Bowie remain the highest Non-Housing Community Development priority and will achieve this overall strategic goal. CDBG funds have been used for improvements to the aging infrastructure of Old Town Bowie streets for the last 17 years. The

49 City of Bowie has spent approximately $2,900,000 of CDBG funds in the Old Town Bowie area from 1986 to 2008. Street improvements, accessibility improvements, rehabilitation, acquisition and demolition have been among the chief capital projects the City has financed with CDBG funds. CDBG funds have been, and will continue to be leveraged with State and other funds in a comprehensive manner to address the issues of growth management. Local, state and federal resources over the next five years will concentrate on efforts to plan and implement revitalization strategies and to encourage development compatible with existing development.

Given the nature of the demographics and growth in Bowie, and the existence of successful operable public services addressing county wide public services needs, the City will continue to invest funds over the next five years on revitalization initiatives in the community. Stormwater drainage issues have been significantly curtailed with the use of CDBG funds over the past four years.

50 Monitoring

The City Manager's Office will ensure compliance with HUD regulations that deal with the effective use of federal Community Development Block Grant funds. The City of Bowie administers a number of federal and state grant programs and has demonstrated its capacity to administer and manage the CDBG program. Project files will be maintained on the CDBG-funded activity; reports will be collected and submitted to HUD on a timely basis. Record keeping will be in accordance with City and federal policies.

On site monitoring will be carried out on a regular basis by trained City staff. The City will enforce the Davis Bacon Labor Standards through on site interviews, and by collecting certified payrolls of project crew. When available and necessary, staff will attend HUD-sponsored training and will provide ongoing technical assistance to other staff members responsible for the administration of this federally funded program. The City has no plans in the near future to grant CDBG funds to sub-recipients.

The City will conduct all CDBG funded activities in accordance to federal and local laws and policies, particularly in regards to Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity. The City currently directly mails Requests for Proposals (RFP) to a list of local minority contractors and provides them an opportunity to bid on municipal capital projects. All RFPs are advertised in the Prince George's Journal and local papers. The RFPs encouraging women/handicapped and minority owned businesses to submit proposals.

Benchmarks: Housing Rehab Program

Goals FY-2019 FY-2020 FY-2021 FY-2022 FY-2023 Applications Received 30 30 30 30 30 Applications Approved 10 10 10 10 10 Projects Completed 10 10 10 10 10 Energy Efficient Appliances Used 10 10 10 10 10 Energy Efficient Doors Installed 10 10 10 10 10

Energy Efficient Windows Installed 10 10 10 10 10 Insulation Replaced 5 5 5 5 5 Bathrooms Remodeled 5 5 5 5 5 "Green" Technologies Installed 10 10 10 10 10 Outreach Activities 8 8 8 8 8

51 Benchmarks: Workforce Employment Training

Goals FY-2019 FY-2020 FY-2021 FY-2022 FY-2023 Applications Received 30 30 30 30 30 Applications Approved 20 20 20 20 20 Trainings Completed 20 20 20 20 20

52 City of Bowie Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development Annual Action Plan Fiscal Year 2019 July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2019 HUDFY18 II. CONSOLIDATED ACTION PLAN FISCAL YEAR '19

Applicant's Name

City of Bowie

Priority Need

The City of Bowie has determined that Housing Rehabilitation for Senior Citizens is the City's highest priority need. Therefore, the CDBG eligible activity for the City of Bowie's Consolidated Plan is housing rehabilitation for single-family units, which complies with the national objective (LMH) to provide benefits to low and moderately low-income residents. Senior citizens are determined by HUD regulations to be a "Presumptive" Low/Mod population.

Project Title

Housing Rehabilitation and "Green" Technologies Demonstration

Primary Purpose: DHomeless D Persons with HIV/AIDS •Persons with Disabilities

DPublic Housing Need •Low & Moderate Income Persons

Geographic Distribution

The entire corporate limits of the City of Bowie, Maryland

Project Description

The goal of all Bowie community development achv1hes is to enhance the living environment and expand economic opportunities for residents. The City of Bowie has embarked on a comprehensive plan for economic development, community stabilization, and an enhanced quality of life for senior citizens throughout the City. The goals for the senior population are consistent with HUD'S policies and as well as its goals for the Energy Star Program as follows:

In implementing this plan, the City has received funds from the MD Department of Housing and Community Development for rehab services and "Energy Efficiency" and "Green" technologies in the housing rehabilitation program for its citizens. We propose to incorporate, to the extent practical, energy efficient, renewable resources in each project as we proceed to

Locations

The corporate limits of the City of Bowie, Maryland shall constitute the boundaries for eligibility m the project

Annual Action Plan 1. Replace old Help the Homeless? and poorly maintained HV AC No Activity Summary systems Start Date: 1. Repair 07/01/18 structural Help those with HIV or Project ID Project AIDS? No damage, Title Completion Date: HUD Matrix Code leaks, and 06/30/19 Funding Sources decay Eligibility: 2. Eliminate Low/Mod insufficient Housing Housing and poorly Sub-recipient: Rehabilitation & installed None 14A-LMH insulation Location(s): CDBG $163,367 3. Correct leaky and The corporate "Green" technology poorly limits of the City of Demonstration Bowie, Maryland installed ducts 4. Replace Local ID Priority inefficient Objective and/or leaky Title Citation windows and doors 5. Provide new Housing roofs Rehabilitation 6. Renovate 570.202 bathrooms to provide Description access for Accomplishments indigent and handicapped Housing semors rehab will consist of: Timeframe

The Housing Rehabilitation project FY-19 will begin July 1, 2018 and will be completed by June 30, 2019.

Objectives

• Replace old and poorly maintained HV AC systems • Replace inefficient and/or leaky windows and doors • Repair structural damage, leaks, and decay • Provide new roofs • Eliminate insufficient and poorly installed insulation • Renovate bathrooms to provide access for indigent and • Correct leaky and poorly installed ducts handicapped seniors

Benchmarks

Energy Efficient Windows Installed 10 10 10 10 10 Insulation Replaced 5 5 5 5 5 Bathrooms Remodeled 5 5 5 5 5 "Green" Technologies Installed 10 10 10 10 10 Outreach Activities 8 8 8 8 8 Applicant's Name

City of Bowie

Priority Need

The City of Bowie has determined that Workforce Training Gob training) for low/mod Citizens is the City's a high priority need. Therefore, the CDBG eligible activity for the City of Bowie's Consolidated Plan is employment training Gob training) under the "Public Service" activities, which complies with the national objective (LMA) to provide benefits to low and moderately low-income residents. City's eligible citizens are determined by HUD regulations to be a "Presumptive" and "Income Approved" Low/Mod population.

Project Title

Workforce Training & Orientation Demonstration

Primary Purpose: oHomeless o Persons with HIV/ AIDS •Persons with Disabilities oPublic Housing Need •Low & Moderate Income Persons

Geographic Distribution

The entire corporate limits of the City of Bowie, Maryland

Project Description

The goal of all Bowie community development activities is to enhance the living environment and expand economic opportunities for residents. The City of Bowie has embarked on a comprehensive plan for economic development, community stabilization, and an enhanced quality of life for its citizens throughout the City. The goals for the segment of the population seeking training are consistent with HUD'S policies and as well as its goals for the US Labor Department (US DOL) and USDOJ agencies as follows:

Prepare our residents to take advantage of State programs as filed with US DOL State plans as follows:

State Plans should reflect strategies that advance these key Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) principles:

• Increase access to and opportunities for the employment, education, training, and support services that individuals, particularly those with barriers to employment, need to succeed in the labor market;

• Align workforce investment, education, and economic development systems in support of a comprehensive, accessible, accountable, and high-quality workforce development system; • Improve the quality and labor market relevance of workforce investment, education, and economic development efforts;

• Promote improvement in the structure and delivery of services;

• Increase the prosperity of workers and employers, the economic growth of communities, regions and States, and the global competitiveness of the United States;

• Provide innovative workforce investment activities, through integrated workforce development systems, that increase employment, retention, and earnings of participants and that increase postsecondary credential attainment and, as a result, improve the quality of the workforce, reduce welfare dependency, mcrease economic self-sufficiency, meet skill requirements of employers, and enhance productivity and competitiveness of the nation; and

• Measure effectiveness, improve transparency, and support informed consumer choice through performance reporting, evaluation, and data systems that support these activities.

Locations

The corporate limits of the City of Bowie, Maryland shall constitute the boundaries for eligibility in the project. Annual Action Plan Activity Summary

Project ID Project Title Workforce Training Program HUD Matrix Code Funding Sources CDBG

Local ID Priority Objective Citation 570.202

Description Accomplishmnets Housing rehab will consist of: 1. Replace old and poorly maintained HVAC systems 1. Repair structural damage, leaks, and decay 2. Eliminate insufficient and poorly installed insulation 3. Correct leaky and poorly installed ducts 4. Replace inefficient and/or leaky windows and doors 5. Provide new roofs 6. Renovate bathrooms to provide access for indigent and handicapped seniors

Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01 /18 Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/19 Eligibility: Low/Mod Housing Sub-recipient: None Location(s): The corporate limits of Bowie Timeframe

The Housing Rehabilitation project FY-19 will begin July 1, 2018 and will be completed by June 30, 2019.

Objectives

Provide job readiness training for residents Prepare residents with job interviewing skills Prepare residents with resume writing skills Prepare residents with job presentation and performance skills Help residents prepare for immediate and future job opportunities Prepare residents to get additional skills through other training programs To provide a better workforce for the City's employers

Goals FY-2019 FY-2020 FY-2021 FY-2022 FY-2023 Applications Received 30 30 30 30 30 Applications Approved 20 20 20 20 20 Trainings Completed 20 20 20 20 20 Contingency

The cost to achieve first year training goals for approximately 20 residents, using the aforementioned quantities and items, is estimated at $50,000. Total first year costs will be $50,000. In the remaining four years, the Entitlement amount will be sequentially reduced by an inflationary 3% to provide projected rehabilitation amounts available for FY-2020 through FY-2023 projects.

Monitoring

City of Bowie Grants Administration, Department of Community Services, and other Departments as required, have the capacity to manage such projects, and has been providing site management and monitoring on CDBG projects for the past 20 years. On site monitoring will be carried out on a regular basis by trained City staff. The City will enforce all HUD rules and regulations through on site interviews, and by collecting relevant data and documentation.

The City of Bowie administers a number of federal and state grant programs and has demonstrated its capacity to administer and manage the CDBG program. Project files will be maintained on the CDBG-funded activity; reports will be collected and submitted to HUD on a timely basis. Record keeping will be in accordance with City and federal policies. The City Manager's Office will ensure compliance with HUD regulations that deal with the effective use of federal Community Development Block Grant funds.

The City will conduct all CDBG funded activities in accordance to federal and local laws and policies, particularly in regards to Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity. The City currently directly mails Requests for Proposals (RFP) to a list of local minority contractors and provides them an opportunity to bid on municipal capital projects. All RFPs are advertised in the Prince George's Journal and local papers. The RFPs encouragmg women/handicapped and minority owned businesses to submit proposals.

Homeless and Other Special Populations

Although the City will not be using CDBG funds on homeless and special needs populations, the City of Bowie will continue to provide emergency services and make referrals to County programs and agencies to residents in need of emergency shelter and transitional housing, particularly families with children as such services contribute to the prevention of homeless. Referrals to existing County programs will also be made for persons with disabilities and persons living with HIV/ AIDS and their families.

Needs of Public Housing

Bowie does not have a public housing agency, nor is there public housing in the City. Public housing has not been established as a high priority need in Bowie. Therefore, the City will continue to refer all inquiries regarding public housing to the County. The City of Bowie will however continue to provide affordable housing that serves the demographics of the community. Anti-Poverty Strategy

By working with the growing number of commercial developers in the City, Bowie is enhancing job opportunities and housing for all economic levels. The growing number of businesses in the city makes it a more attractive and livable place to raise a family. The City encourages coordination with programs and services with a number of County, State and local organizations:

Lead-Based Paint Hazards

The City of Bowie refers residents to regional programs addressing lead paint hazards. These agencies include: the Maryland Department of Environmental Resources, Maryland Department of Environment, Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development, and the National Center for Lead Safe Housing.

Urgent needs

There are no Urgent Needs identified in Bowie.

Impediments to Fair Housing Choice and Other Actions

Although the City of Bowie has not conducted its own analysis on the impediments to fair housing, Bowie housing data was included in the Analysis of Impediments (AI) contracted by Prince George's County in 1996. The Fair Housing Council of Greater Washington and the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (WASH COG) researched and prepared the draft Analysis of Impediments (AI) for the local jurisdictions and the region. Prince George's County adopted a local Fair Housing Analysis ofImpediments, and agreed to assess the progress which local jurisdictions have made in removing barriers to fair housing choice within their boundaries and across the region. It is filed in the DHCD, Community Planning and Development Division, and is available for review by the public.

Several County nonprofit organizations have housing components that address housing counseling, fair housing counseling, housing legal assistance, affordability and accessibility: CASA of Maryland, Inc., Housing Initiative Partnership, Inc., Independence Now, Inc., Korean Community Center, Inc., Mission of Love, Inc., Spanish Catholic Center, Inc., Spanish Speaking Community of Maryland, Inc., United Communities Against Poverty, Inc. and Boys and Girls Homes, Inc. The Department of Housing and Community Development's Housing Development Division has an active affirmative marketing program that encompasses fair housing.

The County requires property owners and developers to comply with fair housing laws including posting of signs and symbols notifying clients of fair housing practices; providing verbal and written instructions to employees and informing applicants on DHCD waiting lists of available properties and vacancies. The County's Rental Assistance Division carries out a number of fair housing activities, including Landlord Initiatives, Regional Opportunity Counseling, Counseling Resource Program, Section 8 Home . Ownership Program, Family Self Sufficiency, Welfare to Work Initiatives, Criminal Background Checks, Fair housing needs are discussed in the Analysis of Impediments. The single greatest fair housing concern is the need for housing affordable to low and very low-income households. The Fair Housing Council of Suburban Maryland reports that the rate of discrimination on the basis of race and national origin in Prince George's County is similar to that of the metropolitan area surrounding Washington, D.C. Discrimination exists in both rental and ownership housing. Accessibility of rental housing is a particular concern for disabled home seekers. Minorities D are facing discrimination securing mortgages and msurance.

Sources of Funds

The City will contribute the administrative costs to conduct the CDBG activities. These costs include all City staff and City resources required to conduct the housing rehabilitation program. Approximately $100,000 is proposed for the Housing Rehab program for the first year, which consists of marketing, development, and capital improvements. No ESG, HOME, or HOPWA funds will be used to fund this project. Approximately $50,000 is proposed for the Workforce Training program for the first year, which consists of marketing, development, and training costs. No ESG, HOME, or HOPW A funds will be used to fund this project. Sources of Funds

Cost per foot =

Cost per project = Inflation (%)=

FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 item GOALS avg unit cost unit % quantitv cost auantitv cost auantitv cost auantitv cost auantitv cost 100 Houses Rehabilitated $10,000 unit 10 $10,000 10 $10,000 10 $10,000 10 $10,000 10 $10,000 200 300 Residents Trained 20 20 20 20 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Allowable CDBG Grant $163,367 $------$------$------$------present worth future worth future worth future worth future worth APPENDIX A

CONSOLIDATED PLANNING PROCESS

67 City of Bowie 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, Maryland 20716

Memorandum

To: Alfred Lott, City Manager

Departments (Joe Meinert, John Henry King, George Stephanos, Sally Hein, Nick S9 geon, Todd Peterson, Denise Haworth, Steven Haley, H. Byron Matthews, Lola remi)

: Jesse Buggs, Director, Office of Grant Development & Administration

RANTS OFFICE DETAIL DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE for the New Consolidated Plan (Five Year Strategic Plan for HUD) FY 2019 - 2023

Date: January 29, 2018

The following is the detailed development schedule for the City's Five-Year Strategic Plan and Consolidated Plan FYI 9-23 (HUD FYI8-22) with the requisite Annual Action Plan FYI9 for submission to HUD:

July- Sept. '17: Develop Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) Oct. - Dec. '17: Finalize Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) Dec. '17: Draft CPP on City website Dec. ' 17: LOI to Con Plan Consultants Jan ' 18: Start Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) Public Hearings Jan 7: Citizen Participation Plan Public Hearing: City Council Jan 29: City Departmental Planning Meeting Jan 31: Mail Citizen Surveys Feb 9: Information from Departments (Level 1) Feb. 13: Consultant Proposals Due Feb. 15: Consultant Selection Feb 20: Consultant Recommendation to Council Feb 20: Information from Departments (Level 2) Feb 25: Develop Draft No. I/Summary of Community Outreach Sessions Feb 28: Citizen Surveys Returned (Due Date) Mar 8: Information from Departments (Level 3) Mar 19: Complete Analysis of Survey Data Mar 19: Initial data from Consultant Mar 20: Draft No. 1 (General Information) Mar 20: Information from Departments (Final) Mar 22: Final Data from Consultant

MAYOR G. Frederick Robinson MAYOR PRO TEM Henri Gardner COUNCIL Michael P. Esteve t Courtney D. Glass t James L. Marcos • Diane M. Polangin t I aac C. Trouth CITY MANAGER Alfred D. Lott City Hall (301) 262-6200 FAX (301) 809-2302 TDD (301) 262-5013 WEB www.cityolbowie.org Mar 25: Draft No. 2 (Focused on Initial Consultant Input and Survey Data) Mar 25: Develop Draft No. 2/Summary of Community Outreach Sessions Apr 2: Public Hearing on Survey Results, Census Data Analysis, all Public Hearings/Public Outreach meetings, and Proposed Projects: Approval of Selected Projects & Activities by City Council Apr 7: Draft of Con Plan and Annual Action Plan with Projects/Activities; On City website for Public Review and Comment Apr 18: Public Hearing for Draft Con Plan FYl 9-23 and Annual Action Plan FYI 9 Apr 25: Public Hearing for Draft Con Plan FYI 9-23 and Annual Action Plan FYl 9 May 7: Public Hearing to Approve Con Plan FY 2019- 2023 & AAP FYl 9: City Council May 10: Incorporate Public Hearing Input and Finalize Plan Document May 13: File CON PLAN FY19-23 & ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FY19 online through eCon Planning Suite in !DIS (HUD System)

Grants Office staff assignments for City Departmental information/data/maps/photos/etc. are:

CMG/Grants Office (Project Lead) J Buggs (General Management/Coordination & IT) G Jones (Planning, Economic Development, DPW) .. C Holland (DCS, BPD, CMO)

Community Outreach Schedule

Citizen Participation Plan (Public Hearings)

January 8, 2018 (Canceled due to inclement weather) Jamwy 22, 2018 (South Bowje Ljbrary; Held) February 5, 2018 (City Council meeting/CPP Approval)

Community Outreach Meetings

Jan 31: COA No. 1 Feb 8: COA No. 2 Mar 1: COA No. 3 Mar 6: COA No. 4 Mar 15: COA No. 5 Apr 10: COA No. 6 May 7: Public Hearing/Council Approval of Con Plan FY19-23 (HUD FY18-22) and Annual Action Plan FY19

Cc: George Jones, Grants Manager/Housing & Demographic Analysis Coordinator Chamette Holland, Grant Writer/CPP Coordinator Una Cooper, Communications Director Mati Bazurto, Business Operations Manager City of Bowie Consolidated Plan for Community Development FY19-23 {HUD FY18-22) Community Outreach/Citizen Participation

~~~ENT O,t:, ~?- ··1f 'Yo ..,1 ,..

\,~ 111111~~$ S,4N DE\11c.\..O CITY OF BOWIE

CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE

OFFICE OF GRANT DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION

MARCH 6, 2018 Consolidated Planning Process

Overview

Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)

Community Planning Division{CPD)-HUD

Program to provide communities with resources to address a wide range of community development needs Consolidated Planning Process

Overview

Community Development Block Grant Program Goals

Develop viable urban communities

Provide decent housing

Expand economic opportunities Address at least one of the National Objectives:

1. Benefit Low-Moderate Income Persons 2. Eliminate Slums and Blight 3. Fulfill an Urgent Need Consolidated Planning Process

Overview

City of Bowie and CDBG

Entitlement Community - FY03

Must develop projects that follow CDBG's goals and objectives

At least 70% of funding must address needs of low and moderate income persons

4 Consolidated Planning Process

Overview

City of Bowie and CDBG The City has used CDBG funds in the past to conduct infrastructure reconstruction and improvements major objective of the Master Plan for the redevelopment of Old Town Bowie The City has used CDBG funds for energy efficiency-related rehab and energy audits of homes for senior citizens. Over one hundred and eighty single-family owner-occupied homes owned by seniors were improved between 2010 and 2018.

The City has used CDBG funds to create and implement a "Workforce Training & Employment Skills Development Program" for youth and young adults.

5 Consolidated Planning Process

Data l Mark et -,1 Analysis l ~ ' " C CAPER I Needs \ I Assessments "" Con su lta tio n and Citizen Priority Annu~ Participation Action~ Needs

Funding and '"'--\.. I st r a t e g Y I Resources ·- I ..../ ------Quantifiable .M"/ ' --- 0 bjectives Citizen Participation Plan

Primary Goals o To solicit view.points and concerns from the general public, as well as from specific groups and constituencies interested in or affected by the Consolidated Plan;

o To invite participation by anyone who is interested in helping identify needs and developing strategies to address those needs;

o To gather data that accurately describes and quantifies housing and community development needs and to suggest workable solutions. Citizen Participation Plan Requirements

The Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) should highlight efforts to encourage participation from:

o Low and moderate income persons o Residents of slum and blighted areas o Minorities o Non-English Speaking persons o Persons with disabilities o Public housing residents, and residents of targeted revitalization areas o Businesses, developers, non-profit organizations and community-based and faith-based orgs, Continuum of Care, and local and regional institutions

* And in areas where CDBG funds are proposed to be used Citizen Participation Plan

The CPP must describe the process the City will use to allow citizens to review the plan and submit their comments.

This includes: o How the plan (or summary of the plan) was published for review o When and how citizens were notified of hearings o Dates of the 30 day citizen comment period o Summary of technical assistance provided to groups seeking funding assistance · Community Outreach Plan oThe City of Bowie will hold up to 7 Public Hearings to gain input from Citizens as it prepares the Consolidated Plan (Con Plan). Hearings have been scheduled in each of the City's 4 Districts to encourage and enhance the likeliness of participation. oNeeds Assessment Surveys will be mailed, and accessible online, to 30% of Bowie Households to help identify priorities, needs, and suggestions from Bowie residents. Surveys will also be provided to businesses, non profits, HOAs, and property management companies.

oThe Con Plan, CAPER, and Annual Action Plan information will also be shared via the City of Bowie's Website www.cityofbowie.org , and Bowie Spotlight Newsletter. Community Outreach Plan

The City has three Public Hearings planned for the Community Participation Plan:

January 8, 2017 Cancelled Due to Inclement Weather

January 22, 2018 South Bowie Library, 15301 Hall Road 12:45 pm - 2:15 pm

February 5, 2018 (Final Public Hearing) Bowie City Hall, 15901 Excalibur Rd, 8pm

11 Community Outreach Plan

The City's Needs Assessment Survey

Goals

o To assess community needs in the areas of housing, homelessness, and community development.

o To facilitate A "Collaborative process" for local government, area residents, homeowners' associations, business community, community groups, service providers, etc.

oTo create more effective and coordinated community development strategies. Community Needs Assessment Survey (Example)

General Information:

Are you a resident of Bowie? No Yes

Which zip code best identifies where you live? 20715 20716 20720 20721 I live outside of Bowie

Which of the following best describes your age range? 18 to 21 22 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65+ Decline

Do you work in Bowie? No Yes Community Needs Assessment Survey can't.

Which of the following best describe your sector of business? Automotive Banking Education Government Healthcare/Medical Non-profit Sales Retail Other

Which of the following best describe your current employment status? Full-time Full-time Student Part-time Part-time Student Unemployed

Which of the following best describes the size of your household? 1 to 3 members 4 to 6 members 7 or more members

Which of the following best describe your housing type? Apartment Condo Single Family Home Townhome Other

14 Community Needs Assessment Survey can't.

How did you initially find out about the Citizen Participation Plan survey? Bowie Alert Bowie Blade Bowie TV Community Outreach Facebook Flyer lnstagram Public Hearing - Twitter Other

How do you prefer to receive information about City news or events? Bowie Alert Bowie Blade Bowie TV Community Outreach Facebook Flyer lnstagram Public Hearing Twitter Other

How do you engage in decisions that affect the City? As a member of a City or Independent Committee/Advisory Group or Panel By providing direct feedback via e-mail or Social Media By speaking directly to my Councilmember(s) By attending public hearings or community meetings By completing and submitting surveys I do not engage in decisions that affect the City Community Needs Assessment Survey

All multiple choice questions are based on the following:

H=High Need

M=Moderate Need

L=Low need

N=No Need Community Needs Assessment Survey can't.

Housing Needs:

0 Affordable Ownership Housing

0 Affordable Rental Housing

0 Emergency Assistance

0 Homeownership Retention

0 Major Home improvement Assistance

0 Minor Home improvement Assistance

0 Rental Housing Repair

0 Energy Conservation/Efficiency Education

17 Community Needs Assessment Survey can't.

Community Facilities Improvements: o Community Centers o Libraries o Parks and Recreation Facilities o Senior Center o Youth Centers Community Needs Assessment Survey can't.

Community Services: o Child Care o Credit Counseling o Housing Counsel./Case Mgmt. for Low Income Renters o Fair Housing Asst./Tenant/Landlord Dispute Resolution o Crime Awareness/Prevention o Legal Services o Medical/Mental Health/Dental/Substance Abuse o Services for Disabled/Senior/Homebound Persons o Substance Abuse Treatment o Transportation o Services for Victims of Domestic Violence o Youth Services

19 Community Needs Assessment Survey can't.

Infrastructure and Public Improvements: o Handicap Access o Sidewalks o Street Improvements o Streetlights o Street Beautification o Traffic Signals o Crosswalks/Markings o Pedestrian Safety/Education Community Needs Assessment Survey can't.

Economic Development: o Improved Appearance of Business Districts o Job Training & Job Placement Services o Rehab. of Older Commercial/Industrial Bldgs. o Loans to Businesses (start-up, expansion, acq.) o Business Incubator o Business Start-up Training

21 Community Needs Assessment Survey can't.

Homeless Facilities and Services: o Counseling and Referrals o Emergency Food and Clothing o Emergency Shelters o Employment Training for Homeless o Substance Abuse Treatment for the Homeless o Transitional Housing o Permanent Supportive Housing

22 Community Needs Assessment Survey can't.

Additional Comments:

Services and Programs not listed above: __

Comments or Suggestions: ______

Submit survey by February 28, 2018

Online version of the survey will be posted on the City website Community Outreach/Public Hearing Schedule

1/31/13 - Bowie Senior Ctr. 2/06/13 - Bowie City Hall 2/21/13- South Bowie Community Ctr. {M-NCPPC Facility in Pointer Ridge}

3/12/13 - Huntington Community Ctr. {M-NCPPC Facility in Old Town Bowie}

3/27 /13 - Kenhill Ctr. 4/11/13 - Cornerstone Assembly of God Church

24 Community Outreach Public Hearing Schedule

Additional Elements of the Consolidated Plan O Fair Housing 0 Homelessness

25 Fair Housing

The City of Bowie has the responsibility under the Fair Housing Act to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing. The City must conduct an Assessment of Fair Housing {AFH} for each Consolidated Plan period (every five years). The results of the AFH must be published for public review and comments. The recommendations and findings must be incorporated into the Consolidated Plan with strategies to overcome problems and impediments for approval by HUD. Fair Housing

The City will carry out its responsibilities through:

1. Education of City Staff 2. Information dissemination 3. Institution of formal complaint process 4. Regional Fair Housing Fairs 5. City Public Access/Cable Television 6. External training Homeless Services Partnership (PGC HSP)

The City's Grants Office is the City's representative to the PGC Homeless Services Partnership {HSP} and attends and participates in the HSP's homeless outreach services and programs throughout the year.

The Grants Office participates in the annual HUD-mandated Point in Time {PIT} count of unsheltered homeless in the county:

o Identifies where the homeless are living in Bowie and surrounding areas o Engages homeless persons and gives opportunities to create solutions o Heightens awareness to a very real problem Bowie Homeless Population

The City provides services to the homeless through several outlets including: oThe Bowie Pantry o PGCC Warm Nights Program o Contacts at PGC Social Services

o Faith Based Community Services

o lntake and Referrals Consolidated Planning Process

Next Steps

Future Consolidated Plan Outreach Meetings

Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018

Meeting Time: 7:00 pm - 9:00 pm

Location: Bowie City Hall {CH 243 - Training Room)

Address: 15901 Excalibur Rd., Bowie, MD 20716 Consolidated Planning Process

Next Steps

Date: Thursday, February 8, 2018

Meeting Time: 10:00 am

Location: Bowie Senior Center

Address: 14900 Health Center Drive, Bowie, MD 20716

Rooms: Classroom 2 & 4 Consolidated Planning Process

Next Steps

Date: Tuesday, March 6, 2018

Meeting Time: 6:30 pm - 8:30 pm

Total Time: 6:00 pm - 9:00 pm

Location: M-NCPPC in Old Town Bowie/Huntington Community Center

Address: 13022 8th Street, Bowie, MD 20715 Consolidated Planning Process

Next Steps

Date: Thursday, March 15, 2018

Meeting Time: 7:00 pm - 9pm

Location: Kenhill Center

Address: 2614 Kenhill Drive, Bowie, MD 20715 Consolidated Planning Process

Next Steps

Date: Tuesday, April 10, 2018

Meeting Time: 6:30 pm - 8:30 pm

Location: M-NCPPC in Pointer Ridge/South Bowie Community Center

Address: 1717 Pittsfield Lane, Bowie, MD 20716

34 Consolidated Planning Process

Next Steps

Public Hearing (Council Approval of Con Plan Projects/Activities)

Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2018

Meeting Time: 8:00 pm

Location: Bowie City Hall, City Council Chambers

Address: 15901 Excalibur Road, Bowie, MD 20716 Consolidated Planning Process

Next Steps

Draft Con Plan FY19-23 Available for Public Review and Comment

Date: Friday, April 13, 2018

Meeting Time: 4:00 pm

Location: City website, City Hall Front Desk & City Manager's Office, City Libraries, M-NCPPC Recreation Centers in the City, and the City Senior Center

36 Consolidated Planning Process

Next Steps

Public Hearing (Council Approval of Con Plan and AAP FY19)

Date: Tuesday, May 7, 2018

Meeting Time: 8:00 p.m.

Location: Bowie City Hall, City Council Chambers

Address: 15901 Excalibur Road, Bowie, MD 20716

37 Consolidated Planning Process

Contacts

City Manager's Office

Office of Grant Development & Administration 15901 Excalibur Road City of Bowie, MD 20716

Jesse Buggs, Director

Charnette Holland, Grant Writer, Citizen Participation Process Coordinator

George Jones, Grants Manager, Housing & Demographic Analysis Coordinator

Email: [email protected] APPENDIXB

CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN

69 City of Bowie Citizen Participation Plan Consolidated Plan Fiscal Year2019-2023

The City of Bowie

Citizen Participation Plan Consolidated Plan for Community Development

Fiscal Year 2019-2023

Community Development Block Grant Program U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development City of Bowie Citizen Participation Plan Consolidated Plan Fiscal Year2019-2023

Mayor: G. Frederick Robinson Mayor Pro Tern: Henri Gardner

Council: Michael Esteve, Courtney Glass, James Marcos, Diane Polangin, Issac Trouth

City Manager: Alfred Lott

City Manager's Office Office of Grant Development & Administration 15901 Excalibur Road Bowie, MD 20716 (301) 262-6200 FAX: (301) 809-2302 TYY/TDD: (301) 262-5013 WEB: www.cityofbowie.org City of Bowie Citizen Pa11icipation Plan Consolidated Plan Fiscal Year2019-2023

Table of Contents

Introduction

Components: Participation Public Access to Information Public Hearings Public Comment Substantial Amendments Public Notice Technical Assistance Adoption of Citizen Participation Plan

Appendices: A-Community Needs Assessment Survey B-Legal Notices C -Public Hearing Documents D -Council Resolution City of Bowie Citizen Participation Plan Consolidated Plan Fiscal Year2019-2023

Introduction

As an Entitlement Community, The City of Bowie is eligible to participate in the Federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). To receive CDBG grant funds, the Consolidated Plan for Community Development (a five-year planning document) must be developed. This document details the City's Community Needs Assessments, Five-Year Strategic Plan, and an Annual Action Plan. The Consolidated Plan must be developed in accordance with an adopted Citizen Participation Plan.

The City of Bowie's Citizen Participation Plan provides guidance for public input and participation in the development and implementation process of the Consolidated Plan, the Annual Action Plan, the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER), and any necessary amendments to the Plan. The City of Bowie embraces the premise that residents affected by programs and activities funded through the CDBG program have opinions and expertise that enhance the planning process. To this end, the City encourages and solicits input in defining housing, community development, and public service needs for the benefit of low and moderate-income families who reside in Bowie. Agencies and individuals representing the needs of the elderly, homeless persons, and persons with special needs will be consulted in planning housing and community development goals. All City residents, community organizations, local businesses, and service providers are encouraged to participate in the development of the Consolidated Plan.

The primary goals of the Citizen Participation Plan are:

• To solicit viewpoints and concerns from the general public, as well as from specific groups and constituencies interested in or affected by the Consolidated Plan;

• To invite participation by anyone who is interested in helping identify needs and developing strategies to address those needs;

• To gather data that accurately describes and quantifies housing and community development needs and to suggest workable solutions. City of Bowie Citizen Participation Plan Consolidated Plan Fiscal Year 2019-2023

The City of Bowie's Citizen Participation Plan includes the following components:

Participation

The City will continue to provide for, and encourage, citizen participation from all sectors of the community. Emphasis will be placed on participation by persons living below the federal poverty guideline(s), residents with low-and moderate-incomes who live in blighted areas, as well as other areas where Federal funds may be used. The participation of minority and non-English speaking residents, and persons with mobility, visual, speech, or hearing impairments, will also be encouraged.

Community input will be gathered through a variety of methods, including: • Community Needs Assessment Survey • Community meetings, focus groups, information sessions and public hearings • Social media, email and incoming postal mail

Community participation opportunities will be disseminated through the following channels: • Bowie Blade • Bowie Gazette • Bowie Spotlight (Official Newsletter of the City of Bowie) • City of Bowie Alert System • City of Bowie Cable Television • City of Bowie Website • Distribution of letters/flyers • Email • Postal Mail • Social Media (Facebook & Twitter)

Public Access to Information

The City will provide information and records relating to the City ofBowie's Community Development Block Grant Entitlement to citizens, agencies, and all other interested parties in a reasonable and timely manner. Relevant / applicable information may include: the amount of available funds, proposed and approved uses of funds, program requirements, anti-displacement pol icy, and benefit ofproposed CDBG activities for very-low and low-income persons.

CDBG regulations, along with a reasonable number of copies of the Draft and Approved Consolidated Plans, substantial amendments, Annual Action Plans, and CAPERS will be available via the City's website (www.cityofbowie.org ), at the Bowie Public Libraries, the Bowie Senior Center, and at Bowie City Hall. Public Hearin2s The City will conduct public hearings throughout the development and implementation

process of the Consolidated Plan, to obtain citizen input for proposed activities and program performance. Several public heatings will be held ( with two weeks prior notice), at times and locations that will be convenient to potential and actual beneficiaries, as determined by federal regulations. Also, accommodation will be made, if necessary, for persons with disabilities and non-English speaking residents. City of Bowie Citizen Participation Plan Consolidated Plan Fiscal Year 2019-2023

The first public hearing will be held on January 8, 20 I 8, to solicit initial input and public comment. This forum will give citizens and organization representatives an opportunity to identify needs in their community. Other hearings will be held from February - May 2018, to solicit public comment on the draft Consolidated Plan.

Public Comment The City will allow a thirty-day public comment period on the Consolidated Plan, the Annual Action Plan, substantial amendments to either, and the CAPER, prior to the final submission to HUD. In addition, the City will receive public comments throughout the development of these documents. Written and oral comments received from citizens will be summarized and attached to the relevant document. The City will respond to written comments and complaints within fifteen working days and the response will be attached. Complaints will be referred to the City Manager for response. The City Manager will determine the necessary actions to address the complaint. Comments, written or oral, will be considered in the preparation of any substantial amendments of the Consolidated Plan. A summary of these comments will be attached to the amendment. Upon adoption, the City of Bowie will make the amendment public and notify HUD that the amendment has been made.

Comments on the Consolidated Plan will be solicited for a minimum of thirty days after each public hearing, and prior to submission to HUD. Written comments may be submitted to: Chamette Holland Office of Grant Development & Administration 15901 Excalibur Rd. Bowie, MD 20716

Comments may also be emailed to: [email protected]

Substantial Amendments

HUD has established the criteria to determine what constitutes a substantial change in the approved Consolidated Plan. Citizens will be provided reasonable notice of such amendments and provided the opportunity to comment on the proposed amendment.

The City shall amend the approved Consolidated Plan whenever a substantial change in planned or actual activities is determined. An amendment will be required for: 1. A change in allocation priorities: a. Based on a new, urgent, or crucial identified need which requires funds to be reallocated from one program area to another b. The reallocation of funds from any program covered by the Consolidated Plan (including program income) to an activity not previously described in the Action Plan. c. An activity is canceled and funds previously allocated to this activity are reassigned to another identified activity or program area.

City of Bowie Citizen Participation Plan Consolidated Plan Fiscal Year 2019-2023

2. A change in the purpose, location, or activity. 3. More than a 50 percent increase in funding from the original grant amount.

Public Notice The City of Bowie will publish notices of public hearings and comment periods, summaries of the Consolidated Plan, amendments to the Consolidated Plan, the Annual Action Plan, and the CAPER to alltiw for public access and participation. Notices will be published in the Bowie Blade, weekly publication, for a minimum of two weeks prior to hearings. All notices will list the locations where copies of the entire document may be obtained, and where public comments and complaints may be submitted. Public notice will also be given on the City of Bowie's website at www.cityofbowie.org.

Technical Assistance

Upon request, the City's Director Office of Grant Development & Administration will provide contact information on local and State government agencies that offer technical assistance in project development.

Adoption of the Citizen Participation Plan

The Bowie City Council will adopt the Citizen Participation Plan at the Public Hearing on January 8, 2018. The City of Bowie will make the Citizen Participation Plan available for public comment for a period of thirty days prior to this hearing, and will comply with its requirements throughout the implementation of the Consolidated Plan. City of Bowie Citizen Pa1ticipation Plan Consolidated Plan Fiscal Year 2019-2023

AppendixA- Community Needs Assessment Survey · Survey Flyer · Survey Press release · Survey Instrument

City of Bowie Citizen Participation Plan Consolidated Plan Fiscal Year 2019-2023

Community Needs Assessment Survey

The City of Bowie is surveying City residents, neighborhood groups, businesses, developers, and public and private sector entities to assess community needs in the areas of housing, homelessness, and community development. Results will be used in an assessment of community development needs applied to the FY 2019 - 2023 Consolidated Plan for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Entitlement Communities.

The link to the survey will be posted on various sites in January 2018. Completing and submitting this survey is vital to the planning process. Results from the survey, along with an assessment of demographic data, will be used to identify and select community development projects for the next five years.

Community input will ensure that funds are used in the most productive ways. Past projects have· included infrastructure reconstruction improvements in Old Town Bowie and rehab projects for homes of senior citizens. City of Bowie Citizen Participation Plan Consolidated Plan Fiscal Year 2019-2023

For Immediate Release: January 7, 2018

Contact: Chamette Holland, 301-809-3009

City of Bowie Administers Community Needs Survey

The City of Bowie is administering a survey to City residents, neighborhood groups, businesses, developers, and public and private sector service providers to assess community needs in the areas of housing, homelessness, and community development. Survey results will be used in an assessment of community development needs applied to the FY 2019-23 Consolidated Plan.

* The Consolidated Plan is a requirement to receive Community Development Block Grant funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

The link to the survey will be posted in January 2018 ensuring that all Bowie residents, including those living in apartments or senior facilities, businesses, service providers, neighborhood and community groups have access to the survey.

Completing and submitting the survey in a timely manner is vital to the planning process. Results from this survey, along with an assessment of demographic data, will be used to identify and select community development projects for the next five years. Community input will ensure that funds are used in the most productive ways. Past projects have included energy efficient home repairs for Senior Citizens living in Bowie, and infrastructure reconstruction and improvements in Old Town Bowie.

The City requests that recipients complete the survey and mail it back to City Hall by February 15, 2018. For more information, contact Jesse Buggs, Director, Office of Grant Development & Administration, at City Hall, 301-809-3094 or 301-809-5013 (TTY). City of Bowie Citizen Participation Plan Consolidated Plan Fiscal Year 2019-2023

City of Bowie "Community Needs" Survey

Good Afternoon:

The City of Bowie is a designated Entitlement Community by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and is eligible for direct Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding. The City must develop a five-year plan through input and recommendations from residents, neighborhood groups, businesses, developers, and public and private sector service providers.

Please complete the "Community Needs" survey, which identifies housing, community, and economic development needs within the City of Bowie. It is your input that will guide our planning process and produce the programs and projects that benefit our community in the most productive ways.

Please completed and submit the survey by February 15, 2018.

Thank you for your contribution. City of Bowie Citizen Pa11icipation Plan Consolidated Plan Fiscal Year 2019-2023

Appendix B-

Public Hearing Documents City of Bowie Citizen Participation Plan Consolidated Plan Fiscal Year 2019-2023

Dear Citizens:

You are invited to a Public Hearing regarding the FY 2019-2023 Consolidated Plan for the City of Bowie, Maryland. This hearing will focus on the Citizen Participation Plan and will be held on January 8, 2018 at 8:00pm in Council Chambers at City Hall. The Five-Year Consolidated Plan is required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for all Entitlement Communities receiving HUD funding.

The 2019-2023 Consolidated Plan for Community Development is a process through which a community, with citizen participation, assesses its needs in the areas of housing, homelessness and community development. The Plan also establishes a Five year Action Strategy and an Action Plan for addressing those needs on an annual basis.

The Plan is also the means to meet federal funding requirements for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The City of Bowie is a HUD Entitlement Community and as such must develop funding priorities that address at least one ofthreeNational Objectives: CDBG projects must, benefit low-moderate income persons,eliminate slums and blight, or fulfill an urgent need. This program allows communities to carry out a wide range of community development activities directed toward revitalizing neighborhoods, economic development, and providing improved community facilities and services.

At the Public Hearing, you will have an opportunity to receive information and comment on the Citizen Participation Plan.

Date: January 8,2018 Time: 8: 00 pm Location: City of Bowie City Hall, Council Chambers 15901 Excalibur Road, Bowie, Maryland, 20716

The Citizen Participation Plan will be available for review at the City of Bowie Public Libraries, the Bowie Senior Center, the front desk at Bowie City Hall, and on the City'swebsite. Persons who need more information or who wish to submit written comments may direct both to Chamette Holland, City Grants Office, at City Hall, 15901 Excalibur Road, Bowie, Maryland, 20716, or by email at [email protected]. Commentsmay be submitted through January 7, 2013. APPENDIXC

COMMUNITY NEEDS SURVEY

71 City of Bowie Citizen Input and Proposed Projects Consolidated Plan Fiscal Year 2019-2023 (HUD FY2018-2022) (

For Immediate Release: Date

City of Bowie Administers Community Needs Survey

The Consolidated Plan is a requirement to receive Community Development Block Grant funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Completing and returning this survey to City Hall in a timely manner is vital to the planning process. Results from this survey, along with an assessment of demographic data, will be used to identify and select community development projects for the next five years. Community input will ensure that funds are used in the most productive ways. Past projects have included infrastructure reconstruction and improvements in Old Town Bowie and single-family housing rehab for senior citizens.

The City requests that recipients complete the survey, fold it in half, tape it closed, and mail it back to City Hall by January 20, 2013. No postage is required. For more information, contact the Office of Grant Development & Administration, Grants Office, at City Hall, 301-262-6200 or 301-809-5013 (TTY), or by email at bowiecplanl [email protected].

(

22 January 2018

To Whom It May Concern :

The City of Bowie, as a designated Entitlement Community by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), is eligible for direct Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding. To receive federal funding the City must prepare a Five Year Strategic and Consolidated Plan. The development ofthe City's Consloidated Plan for FY2019 - 2023 must be developed with input and recommendations from residents, neighborhood groups, businesses, developers, public and private sector service providers, and other stakeholders.

CDBG funds can support a wide variety of activities as long as the City meets the federally mandated national objectives of the CDBG program: to benefit persons of low to moderate income and to prevent and eliminate slums and blight. In the past, the City of Bowie issued CDBG funds for stormwater management and street improvements in Old Town Bowie/Huntington as well as housing renovations and improvements for senior citizens.

We are conducting a Community Needs Survey to help us assess a range of activities over the next three to five years. We are requesting that you complete this survey, ranking the overall level of need for housing, community, and economic development within the City of Bowie. Indicate your responses by selected H (high need), M (medium need), L (low need), or N (no need) in the community. It is your input that will guide the planning process and produce the programs and projects that benefit our communities.

Please complete the survey by Wednesday, February 28, 2018, on line at www.cityofbowie.org/survey.

You may also paticipate in a survey for the Bowie Police Department at the same link: www.cityofbowie.org/survey.

City of Bowie Office of Grant Development & Administration [email protected]

Thank you for your contribution! City of Bowie Community Needs Survey

The City of Bowie designated an Entitlement Community by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is eligible for direct Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding. The City must develop a five-year plan through input and recommendations from residents, neighborhood groups, businesses, developers, and public and private sector service providers.

Please complete the "Community Needs" survey, which identifies housing, community, and economic development needs within the City of Bowie. Your input will guide our planning process and produce the programs and projects that benefit our communities in the most productive ways.

Complete the Survey online by logging onto https://k\viksurveys.com/s/g0i5ABYA.

General Information

Are you a resident of the Bowie? (Select one option) No Yes

Which choose the selection that best identifies where you live? (Select one option) 20715 20716 20720 20721 I live outside of Bowie

Which of the following best describes your age range? (Select one option) 18 to 21 22 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 and over Decline

Do you work in Bowie? (Select one option) No Yes

Which of the following best describe your sector of business? (Select all that apply) Automotive Banking Education Government Healthcare/Medical Non-profit Sales Retail Other

Which of the following best describe your current employment status? (Select all that apply)

Full-time Full-time Student Part-time Part-time Student Unemployed

Complete and mail the Community Needs Survey by February 28, 2018 or complete online at https://kwjksurveys.com/s/g0i5ABYA. City of Bowie Community Needs Survey

( Which of the following best describes the size of your household? (Select one option) 1 to 3 household members 4 to 6 household members 7 or more household members

Which of the following best describe your housing type? (Select one option) Apartment Condo Single Family Home Townhome Other

How did you initially find out about the Citizen Participation Plan Survey? (Select one option) Bowie Alert Bowie Blade Bowie TV Community Outreach Facebook Flyer Instagram Public Hearing Twitter Other

How do you prefer to receive information about City news or events? (Select all that apply) Bowie Alert Bowie Blade Bowie TV Community Outreach Facebook Flyer Instagram Public Hearing Twitter Other

How do you engage in decisions that affect the City? (Select all that apply) As a member of a City or Independent Committee/ Advisory Group or Panel ( By providing direct feedback via e-mail or Social Media By speaking directly to my Councilmember(s) By attending public hearings or community meetings By completing and submitting surveys I do not engage in decisions that affect the City

Please rank circle each of the followin needs as follows:

H = High Need M = Moderate Need L = Low Need N = No Need

Housing Needs: Affordable Ownership Housing (condos, townhouses, single family) H M L N Affordable Rental Housing H M L N Emergency Assistance ( emergency repairs, prevention of utility cutoff) H M L N Homeownership Assistance (down payment, low-interest loans) H M L N Homeownership Retention (foreclosure prevention) H M L N Major Home Improvement Assistance (structural, electrical, plumbing) H M L N Minor Home Improvement Assistance H M L N Rental Housing Repair H M L N Energy Conservation/Efficiency Education H M L N

(

Complete and mail the Community Needs Survey by February 28, 2018 or complete online at https://kwiksurveys.com/s/g0i5ABYA. City of Bowie Community Needs Survey

Community Facilities Improvements: \ Community Centers HMLN Libraries HMLN Parks and Recreation Facilities HM L N Senior Center HM .L N Youth Centers HM L N

Community Services: Child Care H M L N Credit Counseling H M L N Fair Housing Assistance H M L N Crime Awareness/Prevention H M L N Medical Services H M L N Mental Health Services H M L N Dental Services H M L N Legal Assistance (immigration, eviction, discrimination) H M L N Senior Services H M L N Services for Disabled H M L N Substance Abuse Treatment H M L N Tenant/Landlord Dispute Resolution H M L N Transportation H M L N Services for Victims of Domestic Violence/Child Abuse H M L N Youth Services (recreation, counseling, mentoring) H M L N Services for Homebound Persons H M L N Housing Counseling and Case Management for Low-Income Renters H M L N

Infrastructure and Public Improvements: Handicap Access H M L N Sidewalks H M L N Street Improvements (repaving, curbs and gutters) H M L N Streetlights H M L N Street Beautification H M L N Traffic Signals H M L N Crosswalks/Markings H M L N Pedestrian Safety/Education H M L N

Economic Development: Improved Appearance of Business Districts HM L N Job Training and Job Placement Services HM L N Rehabilitation of Older Commercial/Industrial Buildings HM L N Loans to Businesses (Startup, expansion, acquisition) HM L N Business Incubator HMLN Business Startup Training HM L N

Complete and mail the Community Needs Survey by February 28, 2018 or complete online at https ://kwiksurveys.com/s/g0 i5 ABYA City of Bowie Community Needs Survey

( Homeless Facilities and Services: Counseling and Referrals HMLN Emergency Food and Clothing HM L N Emergency Shelters HM L N Employment Training for Homeless HM L N Substance Abuse Treatment for the Homeless HMLN Transitional Housing HM L N Permanent Supportive Housing HM L N

Services and Programs Not Listed Above:

Comments or Suggestions:

(

After you have completed the survey, please fold it in half, tape it sealed and mail it back to City Hall by February 28, 2018. For your convenience, no postage is required.

To participate in the Bowie Police Department Citizen Survey login online at https ://kwiksurveys. com/ s/JVDaHhl9

Thank you for your contribution.

Complete and mail the Community Needs Survey by February 28, 2018 or complete online at https://kwiksurveys.com/s/g0i5ABYA. APPENDIXD

RESULTS OF COMMUNITY NEEDS SURVEY

72 Quick Report

Are you a resident of the City of Bowie? (select one option)

e No v.. Standard Deviation Responses 44 854 All Data 405 898 (5 .. ) (95 .. )

• No • Yes

IC: r V"-0--" qv7/Jf Which zip code best describes where you live? (select one option)

e 20715 20716 20720 20721 • I Nve outside of Bowt• Standard o.vtetion I Responses 476 258 91 55 20 All D•t• 169.02 900 (53'-) (29'-) (10'-) (6'-) (2'-)

• 20715 • 20716 20720 20721 • I live outside of Bowie Which of the following best describes your age range? (select one option)

• 11 - 21 I • 22 . 3• 35 - 44 45 - 54 I e 55 - 64 I e 65+ I e Decline I Standard Devi•tlon I Responses 0 45 109 183 236 309 13 All Data 109.75 895 (Ol<,) (Sl<,) (12l<,) (20'11) (26ll) (35" ) (ll<,)

• 18 - 21 • 22-34 35 - 44 45 - 54 • 55 - 64 • 65+ • Decline Do you work in Bowie? (select one option)

e No e Yes Standard Devtation Responses 728 159 All Data 284.5 887 (82" ) (18%)

• No • Yes

Which of the following best describes your current employment status? (select all that apply)

Full-Time Full-Time Student Part.time Part-Tim• Student Unemployed Responses

525 7 77 4 204 All Data 801 (66%) (1 %) (10%) (O" ) (25" )

600 575 sso 525 500 475 450 425 400 375 350 325 JOO 275 250 225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 Full-Time Full-Time Stude .. Part-time Part-Time Stude .. Unemployed Are you retired?

Retired Responses 65 /UI Data 65 I (100" )

60 56 52 48 ... 40

24 20

Rebred Which of the following best describes your sector of business? (select all that apply)

Stonda,d Non• - Food• RHpOnHS Automotive• Banking EducatMM'I Govemment Hutthcare/Medical• Sales• Retail• • O.vlatlon profit Service °"'"' 6 12 94 274 67 44 28 12 5 253 All Data 96.06 795 (1") (2" ) (12") (34") (B") (6" ) (4" ) (2" ) (1" ) (32" )

• Automotive • Banking Education Government • Healthcare/ Medical • Non-profit • Sales

• Retail • Food Service • Other Which of the following best describes the size of your household? (select one option)

• 1-3 houHhold • 4-6 household 7 or more household Standard Deviation Responses members members memb«s

676 193 18 All Data 278.26 887 (76" ) (22") (2%)

• 1-3 household members • 4-6 household members 7 or more household members Which of the following best describes your housing type? (select one option)

• Apartment I • Condo Single Famlty Home Townhom• I • Othet' I Standard Deviation I Responses 3 13 755 121 5 All Data 291 .19 897 (0%) (1%) (84%) (13%) (1%)

• Apartment • Condo Single Family Home Townhome • Other Housing Needs:

• Hl9hNNd • Moderata Need .. Low NNd .. NoNNd .. S1andard Devletlon • Responses • Weighted Average e Affordable Home OWnership 228 232 173 220 23.64 853 2.45 / 4 (condos, townhouses, single famity) (27'11) (27'11) (20'11) (26'11)

136 194 200 322 • Affordable Rental Housing 67.71 852 2.83 / 4 (16'11) (23'11) (23'11) (38'11)

Emerg....cy Assistance (eme,gency 262 216 184 122 64.91 854 2.19 / 4 repairs, prevention of utlltty cutoff) (31'11) (33%) (22 .. ) (14'11)

Homeown..-.htp Assistance (down 194 232 212 212 13.44 850 2.52 / 4 payment. low-intlll'Ht to.1 1) (23 .. ) (27'11) (25") (25") e Homeownership Retention 238 244 181 190 28.01 853 2.38/ 4 (for.closure prevention) (28" ) (29%) (21 '<,) (22'<,)

e Maijor Home lmprovemet1t 230 317 172 144 Assistance (structural, electrical, 66.18 863 2.27 / 4 (27") (37%) (20") (17") plumbing)

e Mino, Home lmprovem9flt 167 301 232 146 63.23 853 2.42 / 4 Assistance (20%) (36%) (27" ) (17%)

96 215 243 296 • Rental Housing Repair 73.28 850 2.87 / 4 (11 %) (25") (29%) (35%)

e Energy Conservation/ Efficiency 300 307 150 100 91 .02 857 2.06 / 4 Educatton (35%) (36%) (18") (12%) 2.44 / 4

H.gh Need

NoN...t Moclent• N....t

l..owNNG

• Affordable Home Ownership (condos, townhouses, single family) • Affordable Rental Housing

Emergency Assistance (emergency repairs, prevention of utility cutoff)

Homeownership Assistance (down payment, low-interest loans) • Homeownership Retention (foreclosure prevention)

• Major Home Improvement Assistance (structural, electrical, plumbing) • Minor Home Improvement Assistance

• Rental Housing Repair • Energy Conservation/ Efficiency Education Community Facilities Improvements:

• HlghNNd • Moderate Need • low Need • NoNNd • Standard Devilltlon • Responses ... Weighted Av••v• 257 358 177 69 e Convnunlty C9nters 106.03 861 2.07 / 4 (30") (42") (21") (8") 219 275 204 96 Libraries 76.41 864 2.12 / 4 (33") (32") (24") (11%)

336 312 153 68 Parks and Aecreatkm Facilities 111 .22 869 1.95/ 4 (39") (36") (18") (8") 321 316 159 75 Senior Center 105.05 871 1.99 / 4 (37") (36") (18" ) (9" ) 351 298 120 92 • Youth Centers 111.29 861 1.95 / 4 (41 ") (35%) (14") (11 %)

2.01 / 4

H,qhN.-t

1..owNeMt

• Community Centers • Libraries Parks and Recreation Facilities Senior Center • Youth Centers

Community Services: .. HighNeed _. Moderate NNd .. Low Need • No Need • standard Deviation • Responses • Weighted Average

243 299 147 169 e Child Care 60.37 858 2.28 / 4 (28" ) (35") (17" ) (20" ) 161 290 225 180 Credit CounseUng 49.65 856 2.5/ 4 (19" ) (34" ) (26" ) (21" ) 164 257 231 196 FaN"Housl"9 Assistance 35.16 848 2.54 / 4 (19" ) (30") (27" ) (23" ) 475 295 77 31 Crime Awareness/Prevention 178.06 878 1.62 / 4 (54.. ) (34" ) (9" ) (4") 397 310 94 63 e Medical Services 141 .32 864 1.8/ 4 (46" ) (36" ) (11 " ) (7" ) 392 285 107 82 e Mental Health Servtces 128.04 866 1.86 / 4 (45" ) (33" ) (12.. ) (9"4) 251 310 200 97 e Dental Services 78.21 858 2.17 / 4 (29" ) (36") (23" ) (11" ) e Legal Assistance (immigration, 174 213 241 162 49.47 860 2.45 / 4 eviction, discrimination) (20" ) (33 .. ) (28" ) (19" ) 393 312 98 70 e Senior Services 137.63 873 1.82 / 4 (45") (36") (11 " ) (8" ) 387 293 105 80 e Services for Disabled 128.44 865 1.86 / 4 (45" ) (34" ) (12" ) (9" )

298 301 145 117 e Substance Abuse Treatment 84.84 861 2.09 / 4 (35" ) (35") (17" ) (14" )

124 261 211 188 e Tenant/lanclord Dispute Resolution 62.2 854 2.62 / 4 (15" ) (31 " ) (33" ) (22" )

319 312 148 91 e Transportation 100.08 870 2.01 / 4 (37" ) (36" ) (17" ) (10") e Services for Victims of Domestic: 339 301 128 94 106.04 862 1.97 / 4 Vlolence/Chtld Abuse (39") (35" ) (15" ) (11" ) e Youth Services (recreation, 396 299 87 82 135.91 864 1.83 / 4 counseling, mentoring) (46") (35") (10 .. ) (9") 340 322 111 95 e Services for Homebound Persons 114.32 868 1.96 / 4 (39") (37" ) (13 .. ) (11" ) e Housing Counseling and Cas. 133 262 263 201 53.46 859 2.62/ 4 Management for low·lncome Renters (15" ) (31") (31") (23" ) 2.12 / 4 ltlflh N...cl

N-ON-, Mod1tnt1tN~

• Child Care • Credit Counseling Fair Housing Assistance Crime Awareness/ Prevention

• Medical Services • Mental Health Services • Dental Services

• Legal Assistance (immigration, eviction, discrimination) • Senior Services • Services for Disabled

• Substance Abuse Treatment • Tenant/Landlord Dispute Resolution • Transportation

• Services for Victims of Domestic Violence/ Child Abuse • Youth Services (recreation, counseling, mentoring)

• Services for Homebound Persons • Housing Counseling and Case Management for Low-Income Renters Infrastructure and Public Improvement:

• HlghNNd • Mod.,a te Need ... Low Need • NoNNd • Standard Deviation • Responses • Weighted Average

336 283 176 72 e Hanclcap Access 101 .52 867 1.8/3 (39") (33" ) (20" ) (8" ) 397 280 145 51 Stdewa•s 131 44 873 1.69 / 3 (45" ) (32" ) cm,) (6" )

Strut Improvements (repaving, 453 272 120 34 159.36 879 1.61 / 3 curbs and gutters) (52" ) (31" ) (14" ) (4" ) 412 280 143 38 StrutUghts 140.98 873 1.68 / 3 (47") (32") (16") (4") 281 307 223 59 • Street Beautlfk:atlon 96.43 870 1.93 / 3 (32" ) (35" ) (26%) (7" ) 294 295 210 73 e Traffic Signals 90.55 872 1.89 1 3 (34%) (34" ) (24%) (8" ) 3n 262 176 57 • Crosswalk/Markings 117.16 872 1.75 1 3 (43") (30" ) (20" ) (7" ) 351 279 171 73 e Pedestrian Saf.ty/Eduutl on 105.64 874 1.78 / 3 (40" ) (32%) (20%) (8" ) 1.n 1 3

Hi9hNMd

ModPn,taN-.t

LowN_,

• Handicap Access • Sidewalks Street Improvements (repaving, curbs and gutters) Streetlights

• Street Beautification • Traffic Signals • Crosswalk/Markings • Pedestrian Safety/ Education Economic Development

• High Need • Moderate Need • Low N..cl • NoN Hd • Standard Deviation ... Responses ... Weighted Average

• Improved Appearance of Business 251 331 207 79 91.24 868 1.94 / 3 Districts (29%) (38 .. ) (24'1!.) (9" )

• Job Tralnlnv and Job Placement 292 320 166 88 94.17 866 1.84 / 3 Services (34%) (37 .. ) (19" ) (10") Rehabilitation of Older 264 346 192 68 102.07 870 1.91 / 3 Commltrical/lndustnal Buildings (30.. ) (40 .. ) (22%) (8" )

Loans to Businesses (Startup, 211 314 218 115 70.4 858 2.01 / 3 expansion, acquisition) (25'1!.) (37 .. ) (25") (13") 164 310 234 136 e Business Incubator 67.39 844 2.1 / 3 (19" ) (37" ) (28 " ) (16" )

209 303 231 119 • Business startup T raining 65.67 862 2.03 / 3 (24") (35.. ) (27" ) (14%)

1.97 / 3

H111hNood

u,wN-,

• Improved Appearance of Busines s Districts • Job Training and Job Placement Services

Rehabilitation of Older Commerical/ lndustrial Buildings Loans to Businesses (Startup, expansion, acquisition)

• Business Incubator • Business Startup Training Homeless Facilities and Services

.. HlghNNd • Moderate NNd • Low Need • NoNNd • Standard Deviation • Responses ... Weighted Average 248 291 212 115 e Counsel6ng and Referrals 64.93 866 2.22/ 4 (29 .. ) (34 .. ) (24.. ) (13") 329 289 166 86 Emergency Food and Clothing 96.81 870 2.01 / 4 (38 .. ) (33") (19") (10 .. ) 325 259 179 100 Emergency Shelters 84.49 863 2.06/ 4 (38.. ) (30") cm,) (12") 298 298 165 102 Employm«1t Training for Homeless 85.21 863 2.08/ 4 (35.. ) (35") (19") (12 .. )

• Subt1anc• AbuH TrH tment for th• 326 261 166 112 82.83 865 2.07 / 4 Homeless (38") (30") (19%) (13") 224 291 209 144 e Transitional Housing 52.24 868 2.31 / 4 (26 .. ) (34 .. ) (24%) (17") 199 284 203 178 e Permanent SUpporttv. Housing 40.39 864 2.42 / 4 (23 .. ) (33 .. ) (23 .. ) (21")

2.17 / 4

H19hNNd

wwN-

• Counseling and Referrals • Emergency Food and Clothing Emergency Shelters

Employment Training for Homeless • Substance Abuse Treatment for the Homeless • Transitional Housing

• Permanent Supportive Housing How did you initially find out about the Community Needs Survey? (select one option)

City • City of Community• Standard Bowie• Bowle• Bowie Council Public• Responses Bowle OutrHch Facebook• Flyer• lnstagram• Mailing• Twitter• Olher• Deviation Alert Blade TV Meeting Hearing Website Meeting

98 46 6 29 8 7 33 125 1 146 1 4 367 All Data 98.87 871 (11 %) (5'1<) (1%) (3%) (1 " ) (1" ) (4%) (14%) (0%) (17%) (0%) (O" ) (42'1<)

• Bowie Alert • Bowie Blade Bowie TV City of Bowie Web site • Community Outreach Meeting

• City Council Meeting • Facebook • Flyer • lnstagram • Mailing • Public Hearing • Twitter

• Other How do you prefer to receive information about City news or events? (select all that apply)

City of Community City Bowie Bowie Bowie Public Bowie Outreach Council Facebook FlyM lnstagram Mailing Twitter OthM Responses Alert Blade TV Hurtng WNslte Mfftlng Meeting

409 389 74 154 61 58 130 216 14 155 66 23 126 All Data 879 (47 .. ) (44.. ) (8 .. ) (18 .. ) (7 .. ) (7.. ) (15%) (25%) (2%) (18'4) (8'4) (3 .. ) (14%)

500

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

$ ~ ,} ~ ,I' ,;,,~ ·,t .f ~ l' .I ¢' ~ I' rJ -~l ~ :I I I' I' ~· ./' .,o ~ ,,? ,3 •••• .f " 1' I' / i' i' oc,

By As • member of • City or By providir19 By attending I do not By~ com~eting .. .. lndopondont dtr.ct fudb.ck public hNrtngs _ directly to my and Responsa CommittN/Advisory via E-mail or or community decisions that Councilmember(s) submitting Group or Panel Social Media meetings affect the City surveys

48 203 142 243 606 152 All Data 882 (5'1.) (23'1.) (16%) (28'1.) (69'1.) (17'1.)

700

650

600

550

500

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

SO D "- As a member of By proVldmg dJ By~ak.mgdtr By attending pu By completing a 1 do not engage

Comments or Suggestions

Text Responses

comments comments

comments

comments comments

many programs are desirable, but most should not be funded with city money. comments comments comments

comments reduce trash pickup to 1X/week . consider increasing recycle pickup. comments

comments comments none come to mind comments [Null and void. This was entered as a blank ballot to keep the numbers between paper and electronic in sync, as there seems to be a bug that fluctuates the reported and displayed number of ballots in the system between summary view and individual view.] [Null and void. This was entered as a blank ballot to keep the numbers between paper and electronic in sync, as there seems to be a bug that fluctuates the reported and displayed number of ballots in the system between summary view and individual view.]

comments

I suggest adding a current employment status of 'retired' as opposed to 'unemployed.' comments

There should be an "unsure· or "not applicable" option on this survey.

Limit growth

comments comments

comments WE NEED A NEW MAYOR' comments comments

Tell Bowie City Police to actually respond to calls and do their job. They are horrible. As soon as I can move out of the city I am. Thank God we have amazing county police officers! comments comments traffic · getting out of town comments

comments

stop expanding bowie · focus on making what we already have great

comments

""mmt:t.ntc: connecting military/veteran families to the community

comments see comments 764

the bowie food pantry is an outstanding blessing to the community code enforcement - it seems to have changed over the years. not as much of a priority?

no more congestion on roads please. we feel we have all we need in bowie. improve conditions of sidewalk - better drainage to reduce large puddles on sidewalk after rain/snow see comments 748

see comments 744

I do not feel qualified to rank all of the needs you have listed

see comments 735 see comments 733 see comments 732

better and affordable activities for seniors see comments 727 see comments 726

thank you! see comments 721 see comments 720

see comments 717 this is the 50th magic year for living in the city of bowie. happy happy' see comments 701

see comments 695 thank you Taxes too high!!! Too much development, especially now at ' science center' !!! Bowie police not needed and they are abusive!' Replace the domestic water piping so that our water isn't brown.

see comments 688 The city is well maintained. see more comments 687 support for law enforcement - support for fire dept. see comments 685 [most of ballot torn and missing]

see comments 6 72

we need a new high school built - bowie is old and undersized - our kids should be our priority

survey should have answer N/ A or no response see comments 656 see comments 655 see comments 653

See comment 651 see comments 647 see comments 645

programs to teach trades

see comments 630 John Nesky for President'

more police at night early AM

need for a second high school in bowie, hence population has grown and keeps growing

see comments 609 see comments 608 see comments 607 I would rather have lower taxes and less regulation.\

Bowie is a wonderful city to live in. The city services are top of the line, and the employees are professional and caring. see comments 603 see comments 602

widening of 197 between tasker middle school and old 450 (5 lanes with center lane for turning) see comments 594

need more high end retail stores at bowie town center see comments 590 Annex Bowie from PG county to Anne Arundel

see comments 586 see comments 585

see comments 582

See comments #575 Help for sexual assault victims I received this survey March 1, 2018. Mailing was very late! Note: The recipient of this notice is dead. (Dorothy M. Byrd) See comments #567 See comments #565 Help seniors with assistance or paying for having your driveway paved. Power washing house for low income seniors. The smartest thing to do about the homeless is to give them a bus ticket out of town. See comments #556 Help (counseling as well as home repair and financial) for widows/widowers See comments #549 See comments #548 Please slow development and concentrate on improvement of services for current residents. See comments #540 See comments #539 thank you and god bless See comments #532 I would like to have lower taxes and no new apartments' Bowie is growing too fast and growth needs to be slowed. See comments for #523. Newer type speeding cameras in more locations.

Who printed/prepared this questionnaire? Lots of typos; no selection for "Retired" under current employment status. Need running water at the dog park. Fix streetlights on Quisenbury Way & Fletchertown Rd. Mirror on 564 bidge in Old Bowie. I engage (by calling] city hall. See comments for #498 See comments for #496 See comments by feshetel [email protected] on paper ballot #495. Create a You Tube channel and/ or post videos on Facebook explaining the results of this survey, and what steps will be taken because of it. This will encourage Bowie residents to participate more in our community happenings, it will let us know our voice matters, and will also encourage more participation in the next survey. Thank you! NO MORE APT'S. STILL NO MORE APTS. I'm worried about the water infrastructure. Bowie wasn't designed for all this additional housing. Fix up the abandoned houses in Bowie and leave it at that. See comments for #480. See comments for #477. Rte 197 traffic flow and timed traffic lights. Care of sidewalks and bike lanes. Coordination to connect bike paths. Fix rain runoff onto streets. More free services for young children reading and sports workshops. 1 u11r1l'I. uur t.:u111111u11uy ,~ t.:t:!rtc11r11y u1y t:!11uuy11 tu 11c1vt:! ct 1,.;u111111u111ty µvu1 1u1 uur 1,.;1111urt:!11111Ult:! ~u111111t:!1. vvt:! l.;t:!llct1111y nctvt:! 111c111y recreational areas in our city but need access to a community pool! See comments for #466. More police patrols of all neighborhoods. Install speed humps on residential streets Jim Swartz 301-262-2261 See comments for #460. See comments for #458. Police patrol at night... or neighborhood lookout. No Marketplace Apartments Need street re-paving where driveways were installed. See comments for #449. No mention of 'tax credit' apartments, etc. Retired I would appreciate (and use) an ' I don't know' choice. See comments by John Fisher for #437. Curtail development (Bowie is too congested). Repeal marketplace apartment construction approval. Listen to your constituents!!! Efforts to bring better restaurants and retail to Bowie. Bowie Town Center needs to [be] revamped.

Bowie needs a concerted litter pick-up campaign. There is too much trash on our major thoroughfares such as Route 301, Route 197, [and] Central Avenue. Before development of lands are planned, let the people of Bowie vote on these developments (? or !) Services and programs not listed above: 1. community activities to build togetherness 2. parades 3. family sports

I'm very happy in Bowie. none See comments for #416. Too much emphasis on rentals. I assumed that most properties in Bowie are owner-occupied. I don't want apartment buildings in Bowie. See comments for #407. High need= pothole I vote. We do not need anymore multi-family housing: condos, apartments, townhouses. There is a critical need to restrict use of limited parking space in local shopping centers. See comments for #390 Services and programs not listed above: music/art centers outreach. Comments or suggestions: cross cultural communication and understanding See comments for #382 See comments for #380 Great survey! See comments for 375 More [unintelligible] and [camp or comp?) for teens Find some way to notify those that don't have computers or smart phone of upcoming meetings. Bowie is a nice community, however it's really not a 'community.' Fireworks displays, nice-open-available gyms, high school stadium, etc. would help build more of a community effort.

Try to get a high school stadium that reflects more positivity.

Invest in school gymnasiums when PGPCS does not.

Invest in community running tracks.

Choose neighborhoods to beautify. Cut down overgrowth, purchase and dismantle homes, etc. n ...... ,.a,.1; ...... ,. ,.f ...... ;1 f ...... ;.; ...... , uith ,.a; .. .,.hilit; ..... LIVVI uie11vie1y VI 111011 IVI \.,I\ILCII;:) Hl\11 u1;:,au11,~1,e;:, services and programs not listed above: senior community housing? I would like all City elections to be free of donations from developers and businesses or else a limit on all campaign donations of $200.00 per candidate per donator.

I would like the city to address the adequacy of road and schools and the effects on current neighborhoods before approving commercial, retail or residential developments This town has given so much to the community that no family has ever had since the 1960's. Everything new that went up has shut down or not been kept up and never lasts here in Bowie. Such a shame that certain people always want to claim difference. Maybe we the people should be stronger. When I listen to meetings maybe the people that speak should listen to them selves. You want change and more but it does't make sense. Traffic is horrible. Plans that you make like a new Dunkin Doughnuts next door to a restaurant Really, Money should have been placed somewhere better in Bowie. What a mess this is going to be. Also what about 7 eleven that has been here forever. No consideration. Continue to make a difference. More choices like question 17. My choice would be 'I vote. ' We do not need any services described above, nor a hud loan that has the sole purpose of luring low income or crime to the city. We do not want to become east DC. In my opinion, the dust-up over the Marketplace Apartments is unreasonable. No matter what fake excuses the opponents come up with, 'traffic' is not really a concern. What IS likely a concern is that less wealthy people live in apartments, and these opponents don't want to live next to such people. But what is MY concern is that we lose our ability to continue to grow, and to have good relationships with developers, if we back out on our pledge this time.

Another serious concern I have is the lack of Bowie-owned small businesses, especially restaurants. Chain stores serve a purpose, and are efficient. but there is no character. I would suggest more effort on the City's part to provide information and financing to encou·rage potential small business owners to open in Bowie. We should look to Frederick as a model of how to be our own city, not a suburb.

Relatedly, I would also like to see Bowie become more walkable, and more bikeable. It looks like many of the bike trails were started, but never completed. There are also plenty of parts of Bowie that could use sidewalks. This is also where I see the benefit of mixed-use development like in Marketplace or Melford - mixed-use development encourages street-level businesses like sidewalk cafes'

Finally, I would like to express a prediction, and a concern. Between the national political environment (unstable), the fiscal environment (lowering taxes when times are good overheats the economy), and the international political/economic environment (especially Brexit, due March 2019), I think it's unlikely that there will not be a serious recession in the next 12-18 months, perhaps even sooner. I think it would be prudent for Bowie to be careful about its debts and to take steps to protect itself should such a recession occur. Survey does not provide an option to select N/ A which may skew results. For example, at the age of 40 I have no insigh't into the Senior Services or Homeless questions. My only option was to select ' No Need'. Public safety and increased police patrol in communities is needed. There have been numerous home invasions and car vandalism in Oak Pond. There is no option for ' I don't know' or 'no opinion.' 1 .Survey not user friendly- seemed to be designed for survey designers 2. Need a retired option, that status is different from unemployed as it has different underlying factors 3. I selected category 2 needs, not because of my general observations.but on the reasoning of a big growing city with diverse needs and surmising info/ data from the senior center, Bowie Pantry, and news articles I would like to see the churches of the City of Bowie take a much more prominent role in addressing the social services related needs of the city. I own a home in Bowie, but rent it out. I do work in Bowie. Emails and online surveys are great ways to communicate. I am happy as a homeowner and worker in Bowie with the revitalization of the shopping areas. Different people have different preferences in the way they stay connected. I would not put a limit on the optional ways of communicating to communities. The community that I live at Northridge uses a highly effective app that I find very convenient. It keeps me in the loop to all neighborhood related issues. It's called Northridge Nextdoor. This app has been a life saver to me. I am actively interacting not only with my neighbors, but also other local communities to keep informed about everything relating to yard sales, crime reports, recommended services for housing improvements, lost pets, etc. this app can be downloaded onto your cell phone and has been VERY effective at keeping me in touch with not just my neighborhood, but all connecting neighborhoods. I absolutely LOVE this app and would recommend that neighborhoods stay connected using this app. Finally do something about all of the foreclosures! There are abandoned houses popping up everywhere, and many are falling into disrepair. An unlived in house is a dead house. Make the owners (banks, investment companies, whatever) maintain the homes or get families in them. Bowie and PG County shouldn1 have allowed it to get this bad.

Th ;mk vn1, for thP nnnnrt1 mitv tn rln ::1s11rvP.v PIP.::1sP r.nntint IP tn r.nnrl11r.t s11rvP.vs ::1nrl sim il::1r instn 1mPnts tn Pnn::1nP. thP. community and to assess our needs. Safety is important to keep Bowie family friendly. I rated many areas as high need. I would prioritize them by the human safety and caring first. So helping homeless find temporary and transitional housing and job training would be at the top. Also, treatment and transitional programs for people with addictions are needed. Counseling, evaluation and treatment are important for everyone who is struggling with mental health issues. There are several week waits for people to receive evaluation and then to find an appropriate setting for them. The next important issue is having the low income housing for people in Bowie. They now have to go to other towns for that. With the low income housing must come the supports so that they don't end up in evictions. I would love to see Bowie have more sidewalks and support walking with more street lights and car safety or more sports areas for the young people, but I have to say that all the issues that deal with saving lives especially families with children, must come first. Looking to lessen HallStation HOA .... MD state/ local officials need to stop approving Ryan homes to built. If officials would do a post surgery ... they would see How bad Ryan homes had setup the community. i.e., water should be individual billed currenly, my community it barely making the water payments. may end up in news like the community in Oxon hill. just reach out to those who bought from Ryan homes and we will educate you about their business pra Would like to see a world class indioraquatic center similar to Fairland or Sport and Learning complex in Bowie I think the city needs to take into account the over population before it continues to grow and expand. Bowie use to be a wonderful place to live, but with all the new construction and possible over development people are leaving. I am actually looking to leave in the next two years because the city no longer cares about the people but only cares about dollar signs. Budget for more police and training. Put officers in our schools. Provide more support for our officers. Create a program through our police and family and youth services office that brings informationa md awareness to bullying, drugs and alcohol use among tweens and teens and suicide prevention. Make it a partnership with our local schools.

The survey isn't clear as to whether my answers relate to what I, as an individual, need or what I feel is needed as a community. answered as to what I need as an individual. My answers for what is needed/ important as a community would be different. City Staff and Council members do not respond to citizens, especially in cases where they have a predetermined (i.e., closed minded) disagreement, so engagement with the City is near impossible. The West Bowie business district is an eye sore. While I am very much looking forward to the Lidl's going up the rest of the old 450 corridor is an eyesore. My name is Ingrid Harris and I plan to retire within the next 6 months. I would be interested in doing volunteer work in some capacity for the city of Bowie. Your survey is unclear to me if the rankings are personal need or what I feel is important to a community. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this survey and be able to provide my interpretation of our community needs. I definitely think we need to work on the city of Bowie's property taxes . This is drive away good res idents to cities with lower property tax. For what we are paying I think we should have better school, roads.better programs for our children's and better representation as a whole. The police presence around Northview elementary school needs to be improved. The school zone speed limit is routinely exceeded by drivers, even during drop off and pickup times of children. The crossing guard does an excellent job of helping students and directing traffic. When the police officers replace the crossing guard they show up late, do not direct traffic and simply press the cross walk button. This is unacceptable and does not protect the children who walk or bike to school. Bowie Towne center needs to be fixed it is NOW an Eye sore. I've lived in Bowie for nearly 13 years and this is the first time I've participated or even knew that it was possible. I did see one item missing - cell phone coverage in Bowie has declined especially on Rte 450 between Hillmeade and Highbridge - I've contacted both the county and the my provider, AT&T- is there some method of reporting this? Cell phone service has decreased and it may impact emergency services as well as the regular pubic - thanks' I wasn1 aware we had a homeless situation in Bowie. My opinion is if you take care of the families in the community they will take good care of the community. When you have good schools, community centers, churches and safe streets where kids can play, families will want to stay and reinvest in their community. I also agree with assisting the elderly here who need support. I believe the city of Bowie can work together with churches, non-profits, schools, and businesses to create a referral network so that all of our citizens can have better access to caring services. I'd call it We Care Bowie. Please stop any additional housing projects, the city already has too much traffic, there are so many vacant properties that can be used to house individuals, use what is already available, don't let these developers continue to build taking away trees for oxygen and vital green space, this will cause a huge disruption to established communities. The space behind Harris Teeter's should only be used for helping the elderly or disabled members of our community. I'm not entirely sure where Bowie is with a lot of these things, but I have opinions on what is generally important or not. For instance, I know our library just had a renovation and it looks great, so I would say there is a low need to do anything about it now ... but I don't want to give the impression that it is unimportant in general. It might be more beneficial to ask us what we think is important in general. then have the option to write specifics.

Generally, Bowie is great. It's pretty, the people are nice, and we have the best tap water in the world. I don't think we need to change too much except for helping our more disadvantaged citizens. Bowie Blade creates garbage pile up. The electronic message center at Allen pond entrance (northview and nottinghill) is a great idea. Is there another location/ traffic stop that one can be placed' Mitchelleville & collington? My feedback was based on where I feel the need is compared to how well I feel those needs are already being met. The city of Bowie needs to consider that the townhouses and said developments are also a part of Bowie. We are taxpayers too. When we need snow removal. .. we need our snow plowed. When we have pole lights go out ... we shouldn't ha e to wait at least a week ( in the dark), to have SAFE LIGHTING. When we have increased crime ie theft and vandalism ... , we'd like to see a police car in our neighborhood every now and then. No more multifamily housing. Traffic congestion terrible. No more business development. Enforce requirements for students attending Bowie High School that they must live in Bowie. Bowie is a nice place to live. My family has been living in the area for 15 years. Of course we have had some rocky times, but the police - city and state - have always responded on time and taken care of the matter. Bowie is a safe and beautiful place for children and adults to live. The 2nd ice rink seems superfluous. The original is not being used why would a 2nd be better? Please do whatever it takes to widen 197 north of 50. Bowie is a great place to live• A diamond in the rough EXCEPT the schools fall short of acceptable, especially the high school. know this is a PG county issue, but we have no private high school or charter school options. Why? I would love to become more actively engaged in the overall development and opportunities associated with the city of Bowie and the general PG County/DC area. I would like to play an active part in the development of resources and overall quality of living as it relates to where I live. The abundance of trees and parks is what brought us to Bowie. Concerned over too aggressive tree trimming. If it continues we will move out of Bowie. A commuter bus to Washington DC would be nice. We have lived in Bowie for 50 years. We chose Bowie because it was AFFORDABLE to us - it was within our means. We did not go the Crofton, because it is $20K-$40K more expensive for the same house. We did not consider Potomac or the Hamptons because we cannot afford it.

Any references to ASSISTANCE need to consider: 1) is the family a member of the Bowie Community, meaning 5-10-15 years of residency, and 2) is there reasonable expectation there will be an end to the assistance, specifically that it is TEMPORARY. If a family cannot afford the house to begin with, assistance in most cases just sets them up for failure, and sets the community up for another eyesore of a property.

Home ownership comes with a responsibility to maintain the property - homeowner or rental property owner. Code enforcement in Bowie USED to be excellent. Over the past 20-years it has become a farce - with little to no ENFORCEMENT, meaning visual change in the violation status.

Child care is the Parents responsibility, not the City to watch children so two parents can work to maintain a false sense of property capability.

Bowie is a unique, bedroom community ("Obvious"•). We have no environment in which to support long-term homeless individuals/families. We have a minimal environment for panhandling, we have little to no day-work opportunities, and we do not need to make our community inviting to or a 'destination' for homeless support. We live here because it is not Southeast, or Northeast, or Eastwest Highway at New Hampshire Ave.

We need more parks and playgrounds usable throughout the summer. Allen Pond play equipment is not usable half the day during the summer because the sun heats the equipment to levels they are not usable. Watkins Park is somewhat nesstled in the trees and has this problem to a lesser degree, but is a 25 minute drive. This City should address simpler issues such as this, vs. this survey which suggests solving "Word Hunger". I am impressed with this survey. So many questions concerning vital issues. Bowie is so nice but can be very much better!

Look into providing city council meeting minutes by e-mail or through website link If I have concerns, I don't hesitate to reach out to the appropriate offices; have had success. City is very responsive From my perspective Bowie is well run city. I also serve on homeowners association board.

Please keep Bowie safe at the park and ride and young people from hanging out at the bus stop We need more enforcement of speed limits and traffic laws in residential neighborhoods. People drive too fast and our children, runners, and walkers are in danger. Enforce speed limits on Kenhill Dr, Belair Dr, Foxhill Ln. Enforce yielding in crosswalks to pedestrians, using turn signals, and full stops at stop signs. There needs to be a stop light at the intersection of Millstream Drive and 197. We need an indoor swimming pool for seniors. Can we please get a tavern in marketplace? We miss glory days. Keep the revenue in Bowie instead of it going to other cities. As a resident of Bowie for the past 21 plus years, we need more Police Officers presents in the communities. I mainly see Bowie Police Officers riding in their police cars, verse interacting with the community. Bowie Police Officers need to be more hands on, instead of patrolling Bowie in their cars. Whenever I see a Bowie Police Officer out of his vehicle, he is normally pulling someone over, verse walking the beat at Bowie Town Center, or at Free State Plaza, or the new Plaza on route 450. Get the officer out of their patrol cars and walking the beat in the communities.

Respectfully, Mike Hennigan South Bowie would benefit from sidewalks along Mitchelville Rd between Mt Oak Road and 301 . Many pedestrians use that road without a safe place to walk. Also, wouldn~ it be great to replace the fences along Mitchelville like the city did on 197 between Tasker and Rt 450. Visitors to the city for events at Allen Pond and adjacent fields or Bowie Town Ctr use Mitchelville as a main route into the city and the fences are an eye sore. The survey could use a "don't know/no opinion" option. After we improve the sidewalks and bike trails, can we enforce their use? Why do we have to put up with people walking down the street and/or in the gutter when there is a sidewalk a few feet to the side? This includes joggers; USE THE SIDEWALK.

There is a sign along Northview Drive that bikers can use the whole lane? They can use the bike trail along Northview too, can't they? If the city would maintain it that is. None I am a big fan of trees. Trees keep us warm and cool. I fully support Bowie's tree program. Please keep planting new trees on our residential streets. Please publicize the fact that Bowie will plant trees near the streets on our property. Ql 6 {Other) - Nextdoor app/ website In question #5, why were retirees not listed? It seems that they make up a significant segment of the population of Bowie? I have lived in Bowie since 1999 and the city has grown quite a bit in that relative short period of time. The city does a nice job of tending to its citizens' needs. This is not an easy job and I would like to commend the elected officials for doing a job well done. I believe the City of Bowie is in excellent condition especially in comparison to other cities in PG County. Of course, communities are always in need of some for of upgrade/improvement. We should strive to improve on where we are and make what the residents have available to those in need. New skateboard park the current park is one of the oldest and worst in the county new parks are much better but we can do better for the Bowie youth. Also remove the stupid helmet requirement nobody else in PG County has. This would increase participation. I don't see that this survey inquired about crime or traffic, nor safety in the area which may be linked more with the Police Department survey that follows. However, I'd sincerely hope no one moves on plans without having an honest discussion with citizens about those issues before building any further housing developments. These developers that come in do not live here, nor anywhere near us and it's insulting to hear them discuss these true concerns during council meetings then brush us off as though we're simple-minded. Add street lights on dark streets to deter unwanted guests sitting in their cars at night

Lower rental income for apartments

STOP building apartments - area is getting too crowded

Patrol the streets more and enforce the property codes - such as stop cars from parking on the lawn {like noblewood and peach walker). Work with and notify residence to inform them of the policies on keeping their yards presentable and clean The survey format is a little confusing as I am not aware of the needs of businesses, lower income residents, seniors, and youth in my community. Nonetheless, I hope my response is helpful. I engage in decisions by voting people in and OUT of office! Bowie is a great place to raise kids. Bowie will only grow and attract when schools are #1 . Over the years, friends have left Bowie for Ann Arundel when their kids are old enough to attend school. Invest in activities for kids {an organized BBGC} and make Bowie High School a high priority in making it a 21st century building with high standards in academics and highly qualified teachers. city should sponsor full citizen engagement planning activity taking into consideration our changing demographics, aging housing and population, interconnections to region and crossroads between DC, Annapolis, and Baltimore . why were environmental issues overlooked? Thank you for sending the survey. I am glad to have had the opportunity to have participated. Listen, the only reason that I am submitting this ,s because there are no sidewalks on either side ot Yorktown Elementary School and there really needs to be. Racetrack Road is incredibly busy and while one side has a very rough patch, the other side has nothing at all. Between the guardrail and the property boundaries, these is a very worn dirt track. Please consider this as a future project. Need to conduct a traffic survey of Church Road from Old 450 to Route 301 . Road improvements and or traffic light needs should be assessed for current and projected traffic volume for this road. pointless There is a SERIOUS problem with sediment and rust in the water in the Kenilworth section, which needs to be addressed immediately. I am against the heavy growth that is happening to our City. Our infrastructure can not support all of the proposed projects - The Market Place apartments, the Melford property and the Jesuit property. I feel our current City Council is not working in the best interest of the City. Questions 9-13 were oddly worded. There was no real question/ framework for those questions, which was confusing for the survey participant. Better senior citizen housing. Stop future hosing development until the infrastructure is in place. At present, the city does not listen to or accept citizen input on much of anything. Dissatisfaction in the city runs high. The elected council members unilaterally make the decisions and to hell with their constituents. As a result we had to recall our council person although the recall was the first in MD history it won't be the last. The need for youth services are critical. The community center near Bowie High is not large enough to accommodate that population. They need a large, clean, safe alternative to hanging out in the park or at Chik-fil-a.

Also each neighborhood should be in walking distance of a multi-age playground. Halt the out of control development and ' mixed use' disasters that are ruining the basic culture and character of Bowie. If I wanted to live in a city with high rises and lots of development I have plenty of other choices. I chose BOWIE because it WAS a Nationally honored Green City and focused on dependable basic public services and overall quality of life, not putting in new brick and morter shopping centers we DO NOT NEED, which have to be supported by high densitiy housing that WE DO NOT WANT. Lets get traffic and our infrastructure under control again rather than raise taxes to support sweetheart deals for developers. More support for small business in bowie. Does Bowie hold public meeting so residents can attend and here the issues' The City of Bowie needs to spend more of our tax dollars on upgrading our water system and infrastructure. Spending millions of dollars on a new sports complex is unnecessary and a waste of money. There needs to be more sit down upscale restaurants in Bowie. Please stop all the new home and apartment building in this city no one wants it except those who are getting a kick back from it. And leave the undeveloped land alone. If new housing is wanted try redeveloping failing shopping centers and vacant office buildings we have way to many of those' N/A Add a 'retired' choice for employment status. I suggest the need for a year-round community swimming pool. Lower taxes.

The City of Bowie needs a new gymnasium to provide more basketball courts for its youth and all citizens. The Bowie Gym is dangerously overcrowded. The decision to build 2 new ice rinks is the worst decision in the history of this city. The citizens should be appalled. I have lived in Bowie since 1967. I have seen it grow into a drug dealing, violent place. These are the things that need to be controlled. The high school drop out rate is terrible. Teens are out of school, no work, and most do not have a car. They are bored and looking for things to do. So they get into trouble. APPENDIXE

LEGAL NOTICES

73 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF BOWIE, MARYLAND

City of Bowie Consolidated Plan FY2019·2023 (HUD FY2018·2022) Community Development Block Grant Notice of Public Hearing

In accordance with guidelines established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), notice is hereby given that the City of Bowie, as an Entitlement Community participating in the federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, solicits public comment on proposed projects for the Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development FY2019-2023 at a Public Hearing to be held on Monday, April 2, 2018 at 8:00 pm at Bowie City Hall, 15901 Excalibur Road, Bowie, Maryland, 20716. The Five Year Strategy Plan identifies community needs and proposed solutions in the areas of Housing, Special Needs, Economic Development, and Non Housing Community Development. The City's CDBG activities will benefit low and moderate- income persons by making improvements through a program to be designed to support these populations. These activities will be prioritized by residents, businesses, nonprofits, and City management and are consistent with the results of recent studies of demographic and housing conditions in the City. All City CDBG documents are posted on the City's website: www.cityofbowie/cdbg, under Consolidated Plan FY 2019-2023 (HUD FY2018-2022). Accommodation for persons with disabilities and non-English speaking residents will be provided upon request. For additional information, please call 301-809-3072.

Alfred D. Lott City Manager

For Publication: Bowie-Blade News-3/22/18 APPENDIXF

COMMUNITY MEETINGS

75 COMMUNITY OUTREACH MEETINGS

Please mark your calendars to attend ... The City of Bowie, as a designated Entitlement Community by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), is eligible for direct Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding. To receive federal funding the City must prepare a Five Year Strategic and Consolidated Plan with input and recommendation from residents, neighborhood groups, businesses, developers, public and private sector service providers, and other stakeholders.

The City will hold several Community Outreach Meetings to discuss the

City's Five Year Strategic Plan and Consolidated Plan for FY 2019 - 2023. Feel free to send questions or comments to [email protected]. APPENDIXYG

CERTIFICATIONS

78 CERTIFICATIONS

In accordance with the applicable statutes and the regulations governing the consolidated plan regulations, the City ofBowie certifies that:

Affirmatively Further Fair Housing -- It will affirmatively further fair housing, which means it will conduct an analysis of impediments to fair housing choice within the jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through that analysis, and maintain records reflecting that analysis and actions in this regard.

Anti-displacement and Relocation Plan -- It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, and implementing regulations at 49 CFR 24; and it has in effect and is following a residential anti-displacement and relocation assistance plan required under section 104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, in connection with any activity assisted with funding under the CDBG or HOME programs.

Drug Free Workplace -- It will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by:

1. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition;

2. Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about

(a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (b) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; (c) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and ( d) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace;

3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by Paragraph 1;

4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by Paragraph 1 that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will -

(a) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (b) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction;

5. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant;

6. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days ofreceiving notice under subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted -

79 (a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (b) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;

7. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

Anti-Lobbying -- To the best of the City of Bowie's knowledge and belief:

1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement;

2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and

3. It will require that the language of paragraph 1 and 2 of this anti-lobbying certification be included in the award documents for all sub awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, sub grants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all sub recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

80 Authority of Jurisdiction -- The consolidated plan is authorized under State and local law ( as applicable) and the City ofBowie possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs for which it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations.

Consistency with plan -- The housing activities to be undertaken with CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPW A funds are consistent with the strategic plan.

Section 3 -- It will comply with Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 135.

/Vla.l 1, Z.cl~ City Manager Augm,t 4, 2QQ8 • Signature Title Date

81 Specific CDBG Certifications

The City of Bowie , as an Entitlement Community, certifies that:

Citizen Participation -- It is in full compliance and following a detailed citizen participation plan that satisfies the requirements of 24 CFR 91.105.

Community Development Plan -- Its Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short-term and long-term community development objectives that provide decent housing, expand economic opportunities primarily for persons of low and moderate income. (See CFR 24 570.2 and CFR 24 part 570)

Following a Plan -- It is following a current consolidated plan ( or Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) that has been approved by HUD.

Use of Funds -- It has complied with the following criteria:

1. Maximum Feasible Priority. With respect to activities expected to be assisted with CDBG funds, it certifies that it has developed its Action Plan so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. The Action Plan may also include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not available);

2. Overall Benefit. The aggregate use of CDBG funds including section 108 guaranteed loans during program year(s), (a period specified by the grantee consisting of one, two, or three specific consecutive program years), shall principally benefit persons oflow and moderate income in a manner that ensures that at least 70 percent of the amount is expended for activities that benefit such persons during the designated period;

3. Special Assessments. It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements. However, if CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of public improvements ( assisted in part with CDBG funds) financed from other revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds.

The City of Bowie will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds, including Section 108, unless CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of fee or assessment attributable to the capital costs of public improvements financed from other revenue sources. In this case, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. Also, in the case of properties owned and occupied by moderate-income (not low-income) families, an assessment or charge may be made against the property for public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks CDBG funds to cover the assessment.

Excessive Force - The City of Bowie has adopted and is enforcing:

1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and

82 2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction;

Compliance With Anti-discrimination laws -- The grant will be conducted and administered in conformity with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d), the Fair Housing Act (42 USC 3601-3619), and implementing regulations.

Lead-Based Paint -- Its activities concerning lead-based paint will comply with the requirements of 24 CFR Part 35, subparts A, B, J, Kand R.

Compliance with Laws -- It will comply with applicable laws.

rv\t\ i 1, 1...0 IY City Manager Aagnst 4, 200~ Signature Title Date