DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Romania-Bulgaria Cross Border Cooperation Programme 2014-2020 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Romania-Bulgaria Cross Border Cooperation Programme 2014-2020 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Romania-Bulgaria Cross Border Cooperation Programme 2014-2020 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT Version 0 Environmental Report SEA 09.07.2014 2014-2020 RO-BG CBC Programme Project Identification Project title: ”Ex-ante Evaluation and SEA of Romania-Bulgaria Cross Border Cooperation Programme 2014-2020” Contract number: 11716/19.09.2013 Contracting Cross Border Cooperation Regional Office Călărași for Romania-Bulgaria Border Authority: Chiciu area, part of the main building representing the Passengers and Goods Transport Public Service headquarter at CBCP Călărasi (Romania) – Silistra (Bulgaria), Călărasi County Tel. + 40 242 313 091, Fax: + 40 242 231 3092 www.calarasicbc.ro/www.cbcromaniabulgaria.eu Contact person: Nicoleta MINCU – Executive Director Bogdan MUȘAT – Head of Joint Technical Secretariat for Romania-Bulgaria Cross-Border Cooperation Programme 2007- 2013 Implementing Ministry of Regional Development and Public Authority: Administration (MDRAP) – Managing Authority for the Romania-Bulgaria Cross-Border Cooperation Programme 2007-2013 Apolodor street, Bucuresti Tel: 004 0737 244 509; 0372 111 339; Fax: 004 0372 111 456 www.cbcromaniabulgaria.eu Contact person: Ioana GLĂVAN – Head of Unit Contractor: International Consulting Expertise srl (ICE) (Technical capacity third sustaining partner ÖAR Regionalberatung GmbH) Vasile Lascăr nr. 42-44, floor 7, apt.17-18, Sector 2, Bucuresti Tel: 021 201 65 14 / 021 201 65 15, Fax: 021 211 01 81 Email: [email protected], www.iceconsult.ro Contact person: Maria TIMOFTE – Head of Contract Management Department Tel: 0731 019412, E-mail: [email protected] This Report has been prepared by the Technical Assistance team composed of Svetla TRAYCHEVA and Marilena PĂTRASCU – SEA Experts. The findings, conclusions and interpretations expressed in this document are those of the authors alone and should in no way be taken to reflect the policies or opinion of the European Commission or other parties. 2 Environmental Report SEA 09.07.2014 2014-2020 RO-BG CBC Programme Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................... 14 1.1 Presentation of the Programme’s Title-Holder ............................................. 14 1.2 Background of Programme’s Development .................................................. 15 1.3 Methodology and Legal Framework ..................................................... 16 1.1.1 Environmental Policy and Objectives ....................................................16 1.1.2 Legislative Framework for SEA ............................................................16 1.1.3 Methodological approach ..................................................................18 1.1.4 Method of environmental assessment ....................................................19 2 Description of Romania - Bulgaria CBC Programme 2014-2020 ..................... 20 2.1 Contents of the Programme ............................................................. 20 2.1.1 Introduction .................................................................................20 2.1.2 Eligible geographic area ...................................................................20 2.1.3 Relevant period of time ....................................................................20 2.2 Main objectives of the Programme ..................................................... 20 2.3 Indicative actions/ measures under the Priority Axes ............................... 24 2.3.1 Actions under Priority Axis 1: A well connected region ...............................24 2.3.2 Actions under Priority Axis 2: A green region ...........................................26 2.3.3 Actions under Priority Axis 3: A safe region .............................................28 2.3.4 Actions under Priority Axis 4: A skilled and inclusive region .........................30 2.3.5 Actions under Priority Axis 5: An efficient region ......................................31 2.4 Relationship with other relevant plans and programmes ............................ 33 2.4.1 Main EU Strategic Documents .............................................................33 2.4.2 National Strategies, Programmes and Plans in Romania ..............................34 2.4.3 National and Regional Programmes, Plans and Strategies for Bulgaria .............54 3 Environmental Aspects ..................................................................... 70 3.1 General Baseline .......................................................................... 70 3.1.1 Geographical area likely to be affected .................................................70 3.1.2 Size of the population likely to be affected ............................................71 3.2 Current state of the environment ...................................................... 71 3.2.1 Geological setting and relief ..............................................................71 3.2.2 Climate and Air Quality ....................................................................73 3.2.3 Water .........................................................................................79 3.2.3.1 Surface Water ...................................................................... 79 3.2.3.2 Ground Water ....................................................................... 85 3.2.4 Soil and land use ............................................................................90 3.2.5 Landscape ....................................................................................94 3 Environmental Report SEA 09.07.2014 2014-2020 RO-BG CBC Programme 3.2.6 Biodiversity ..................................................................................97 3.2.6.1 Flora and fauna ..................................................................... 97 3.2.6.2 Designated Areas .................................................................. 105 3.2.7 Cultural Heritage ......................................................................... 108 3.2.8 Material Assets ............................................................................ 112 3.2.9 Waste ....................................................................................... 120 3.2.10 Population and Human Health .......................................................... 125 3.3 Likely evolution without implementation of the programme ...................... 137 3.3.1 Climate and Air Quality .................................................................. 137 3.3.2 Water ....................................................................................... 137 3.3.2.1 Surface Water ..................................................................... 137 3.3.2.2 Ground Water ...................................................................... 137 3.3.3 Soil .......................................................................................... 138 3.3.4 Landscape .................................................................................. 138 3.3.5 Biodiversity ................................................................................ 138 3.3.6 Cultural Heritage ......................................................................... 138 3.3.7 Waste ....................................................................................... 139 3.3.8 Material Assets ............................................................................ 139 3.3.9 Population and Human Health .......................................................... 139 4 Environmental characteristics of the areas to be significantly affected ........ 140 4.1 Landscapes and areas having a recognised international protection status ..... 140 4.2 Landscapes and areas of Community interest ........................................ 141 4.3 Landscapes and areas having a national nature protection status ................ 142 4.4 Areas designated for extraction of water intended for human consumption .... 143 4.5 Water bodies designated for recreation, including areas designated as bathing waters ...................................................................................... 147 4.6 Areas designated for the protection of economically significant aquatic species148 4.7 Areas of nutrient-sensitive waters, including vulnerable areas ................... 149 4.7.1 Sensitive areas ............................................................................ 149 4.7.2 Vulnerable areas .......................................................................... 150 5 Existing environmental problems ....................................................... 151 5.1 Climate and Air Quality ................................................................. 151 5.2 Water ...................................................................................... 152 5.2.1 Surface Water ............................................................................. 152 5.2.2 Ground Water ............................................................................. 153 5.3 Soil ......................................................................................... 154 5.4 Landscape ................................................................................. 155 5.5 Biodiversity ................................................................................ 156 5.5.1 Flora and Fauna ........................................................................... 156 4 Environmental Report SEA 09.07.2014 2014-2020 RO-BG CBC Programme 5.5.2 Designated Areas .........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perspectives of the Business Area Development in the Romanian Rural Area
    НАУЧНИ ТРУДОВЕ НА РУСЕНСКИЯ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ - 2013, том 52, серия 5.1 Perspectives of the business area development in the Romanian rural area. Case study Calarasi county Daniela Cretu1 Elena Lascăr2 Abstract: The rural area in Călăraşi county has a particular importance for the development of the county, so its analysis wants to identify the vital positive and negative elements for its sustainable development. With a decreasing population and its density of about 61 inhabitants/km should be considered mainly a predominant rural county, with over half of the population in rural area in 2012, which represents a much higher value than the average of the recently integrated EU countries. Thus, the rural and agricultural development will form a solid pillar. The success and prosperity of the county depend on their economic performances. The county is dependent on agriculture and on rural economy. The spread of globalization threatens the traditional agriculture. Key words: agriculture, active population, employed population, investments, rural area resources. INTRODUCTION Călăraşi county is part of South-Muntenia development Region, it was declared as territorial-administrative unit in January 1981, it is situated in the South-East part of Romania, on the left shore of the Danube and Borcea Branch and it borders in the North with Ialomiţa county, in the East with Constanţa county, in the West with Giurgiu county and Ilfov Agricultural Sector and in the South with Bulgaria [2]. The county has a surface of 508,785 ha, representing 2.1% of Romania, Călăraşi county occupies 28th place among the country counties [4]. From administrative point of view, the county contains 2 municipalities, 3 towns, 50 communes and 161 villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Domitian's Dacian War Domitian'in Daçya Savaşi
    2020, Yıl 4, Sayı 13, 75 - 102 DOMITIAN’S DACIAN WAR DOMITIAN’IN DAÇYA SAVAŞI DOI: 10.33404/anasay.714329 Çalışma Türü: Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article1 Gökhan TEKİR* ABSTRACT Domitian, who was one of the most vilified Roman emperors, had suf- fered damnatio memoriae by the senate after his assassination in 96. Senator historians Tacitus and Cassius Dio ignored and criticized many of Domitian’s accomplishments, including the Dacian campaign. Despite initial setbacks in 86 and 87, Domitian managed to push the invading Dacians into the Dacian terri- tory and even approached to the Dacian capital in 88. However, the Saturninus revolt and instability in the Chatti and Pannonia in 89 prevented Domitian from concluding the campaign. The peace treaty stopped the Dacian incursions and made Dacia a dependent state. It is consistent with Domitian’s non-expansionist imperial policy. This peace treaty stabilized a hostile area and turned Dacia a client kingdom. After dealing with various threats, he strengthened the auxiliary forces in Dacia, stabilizing the Dacian frontier. Domitian’s these new endeavors opened the way of the area’s total subjugation by Trajan in 106. Keywords: Domitian, Roman Empire, Dacia, Decebalus, security 1- Makale Geliş Tarihi: 03. 04. 2020 Makale Kabül Tarihi: 15. 08. 2020 * Doktor, Email: [email protected] ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-7442 75 DomItIan’s DacIan War ÖZ Domitian 96 yılında düzenlenen suikast sonucunda hakkında senato tarafından ‘hatırası lanetlenen’ ve hakkında en çok karalama yapılan Roma imparatorlarından birisidir. Senatör tarihçilerden olan Tacitus ve Cassius Dio, Domitian’ın bir çok başarısını görmezden gelmiş ve eleştirmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Redescription of Eudontomyzon Stankokaramani (Petromyzontes, Petromyzontidae) – a Little Known Lamprey from the Drin River Drainage, Adriatic Sea Basin
    Folia Zool. – 53(4): 399–410 (2004) Redescription of Eudontomyzon stankokaramani (Petromyzontes, Petromyzontidae) – a little known lamprey from the Drin River drainage, Adriatic Sea basin Juraj HOLČÍK1 and Vitko ŠORIĆ2 1 Department of Ecosozology, Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 06 Bratislava, Slovak Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Faculty of Science, University of Kragujevac, R.Domanovića 12, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia and Montenegro; e-mail: [email protected] Received 28 May 2004; Accepted 24 November 2004 A b s t r a c t . Nonparasitic lamprey found in the Beli Drim River basin (Drin River drainage, Adriatic Sea watershed) represents a valid species Eudontomyzon stankokaramani Karaman, 1974. From other species of the genus Eudontomyzon it differs in its dentition, and the number and form of velar tentacles. This is the first Eudontomyzon species found in the Adriatic Sea watershed. Key words: Eudontomyzon stankokaramani, Beli Drim River basin, Drin River drainage, Adriatic Sea watershed, West Balkan, Serbia Introduction Eudontomyzon is one of five genera that belong to the family Petromyzontidae occurring in the Palaearctic faunal region. Within this region the genus is composed of one parasitic and two non-parasitic species. According to recent knowledge, Europe is inhabited by E. danfordi Regan, 1911, E. mariae (Berg, 1931), E. hellenicus Vladykov, Renaud, Kott et Economidis, 1982, and also by a still unnamed but now probably extinct species of anadromous parasitic lamprey related to E. mariae known from the Prut, Dnieper and Dniester Rivers (H o l č í k & R e n a u d 1986, R e n a u d 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria
    I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo
    [Show full text]
  • Bullard Eva 2013 MA.Pdf
    Marcomannia in the making. by Eva Bullard BA, University of Victoria, 2008 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Greek and Roman Studies Eva Bullard 2013 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Marcomannia in the making by Eva Bullard BA, University of Victoria, 2008 Supervisory Committee Dr. John P. Oleson, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Supervisor Dr. Gregory D. Rowe, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Departmental Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee John P. Oleson, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Supervisor Dr. Gregory D. Rowe, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Departmental Member During the last stages of the Marcommani Wars in the late second century A.D., Roman literary sources recorded that the Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius was planning to annex the Germanic territory of the Marcomannic and Quadic tribes. This work will propose that Marcus Aurelius was going to create a province called Marcomannia. The thesis will be supported by archaeological data originating from excavations in the Roman installation at Mušov, Moravia, Czech Republic. The investigation will examine the history of the non-Roman region beyond the northern Danubian frontier, the character of Roman occupation and creation of other Roman provinces on the Danube, and consult primary sources and modern research on the topic of Roman expansion and empire building during the principate. iv Table of Contents Supervisory Committee .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Nikola Wind Farm Public Disclosure and Consultation Plan [EBRD
    Saint Nikola Wind Farm, Bulgaria Public Disclosure and Consultation Plan AGE May 2008 Kavarna Wind Farm Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan RSK GENERAL NOTES Project No: P80154 Title: Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan Client: AGE Issue Date: May 2008 Issuing Office: Glasgow Project Manager Date: 22/05/08 Authorised by: Project QA Rep Date: 22/05/08 Authorised by: RSK Environment Ltd (RSK) has prepared this report for the sole use of the client, showing reasonable skill and care, for the intended purposes as stated in the agreement under which this work was completed. The report may not be relied upon by any other party without the express agreement of the client and RSK. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report. Where any data supplied by the client or from other sources have been used, it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by RSK for inaccuracies in the data supplied by any other party. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on the assumption that all relevant information has been supplied by those bodies from whom it was requested. No part of this report may be copied or duplicated without the express permission of RSK and the party for whom it was prepared. Where field investigations have been carried out, these have been restricted to a level of detail required to achieve the stated objectives of the work. This work has been undertaken in accordance with the Quality Management System of RSK.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3. Potential Impact on Soil
    The National Institute of Research and Development for Environmental Protection - ICIM Bucharest 4.3. Potential Impact on Soil 4.3.1. Dominant Soil Types The Cernavoda NPP site was prepared for 5 reactors and for the necessary installations and activities for their construction and operation during a long period. This site is in a former lime quarry area (called Ilie Barza), on the left side of Danube- Black Sea Canal. The site preparation works resulted in an almost flat area with an upper layer consisting of limestone. After specific engineering works, most of the prepared land area was used for various constructions and inner roads (Ref. 4.3-1). Some green areas have also been arranged. The land surface for the Cernavoda NPP Unit 3 is now a built area. At a larger scale, taking into consideration the zones defined around the NPP (section 4.2.7.4), the Cernavoda site area belongs to the plateau between the Danube branch Dunarea Veche and the Black Sea, known as South Dobrogea Platform. The Cernavoda NPP site is not far from the Danube, but it is not near its floodplain. On the right bank of the Danube, in the floodplain, there are alluvial soils. They are undeveloped soils, non-homogenous, having sand to clay structure. Towards east, there are gray soils (Ref. 4.3-1, 4.3-2), characteristic for dry climate areas. Due to the low humidity, alteration and levigation are less intense. These gray soils are poor in humus (2-3%) and nutritive substances. Although the gray soils present good physical characteristics, they do not accumulate water enough because of the low rain quantities and their distribution during the whole year, so that a humidity deficiency in soil is found during most part of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania - Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review Th 15 Session of the UPR - Human Rights Council
    Romania - Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review th 15 session of the UPR - Human Rights Council Contributed by: El Tera Association Roma Center for Social Intervention and Studies- Romani CRISS Sanse Egale Association Sange Egale pentru Copii si Femei 1 INTRODUCTION Under the universal periodic review, the submitting organizations have used primarily information collected by Romani CRISS, during 2008 until present, since Romania was most recently evaluated under the UPR. Romani CRISS, as well as human rights local monitors’ organizations, are documenting cases in the field cases of violation of human rights of the Roma communities’ members. The current submission will focus on the following areas: right to human dignity; right to life; right not to be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, right not to be discriminated against; freedom of movement and right to leave any country; right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being – with a particular focus on housing and medical care; right to education. The submission will also look at developments since the previous review, particularly normative and institutional framework, for the promotion and protection of human rights. 1. DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE MAY 2008 SESSION Content of recommendation no 6 To continue to respect and promote the human rights of vulnerable groups, including the Roma communities and to continue to take further action to ensure equal enjoyment of human rights by Roma people, as well as to take further appropriate and effective measures to eliminate discrimination against Roma and ensures in particular their access to education, housing, healthcare and employment without discrimination, and gives a follow up to the recommendations of the United Nations human rights bodies in this regard.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenţia Judeţeană Pentru Plăţi Şi Inspecţie Socială CONSTANTA RAPORT PRIVIND ALOCAŢIA DE STAT PENTRU COPII Luna De
    Agenţia Judeţeană pentru Plăţi şi Inspecţie Socială CONSTANTA RAPORT PRIVIND ALOCAŢIA DE STAT PENTRU COPII Luna de raportare: 11/2020 Suma totală platită pentru drepturile Localitate Beneficiari plătiţi curente (lei) 23 AUGUST 884 182860 ADAMCLISI 483 97635 AGIGEA 1386 285114 ALBESTI 749 154573 ALIMAN 594 119642 AMZACEA 551 112055 BANEASA 1367 276815 BARAGANU 453 91717 CASTELU 1280 264400 CERCHEZU 281 56401 CERNAVODA 3146 647330 CHIRNOGENI 618 123898 CIOBANU 670 134070 CIOCARLIA 578 116498 COBADIN 1970 397754 COGEALAC 1048 213016 COMANA 452 91716 CONSTANTA 47307 9654867 CORBU 1140 229300 COSTINESTI 544 113520 CRUCEA 540 107812 CUMPANA 2867 587619 CUZA VODA 1325 269413 DELENI 490 97090 DOBROMIR 1242 249458 DUMBRAVENI 101 21077 EFORIE 1493 299573 FANTANELE 292 58804 GARLICIU 298 61386 GHINDARESTI 354 72666 GRADINA 210 42530 HARSOVA 2217 450257 1 Suma totală platită pentru drepturile Localitate Beneficiari plătiţi curente (lei) HORIA 174 36054 INDEPENDENTA 607 122415 ION CORVIN 461 93381 ISTRIA 524 106140 LIMANU 1053 210445 LIPNITA 523 103563 LUMINA 2011 408099 MANGALIA 5957 1202877 MEDGIDIA 7223 1472047 MERENI 531 106331 MIHAI VITEAZU 966 192878 MIHAIL KOGALNICEANU 1626 326938 MIRCEA VODA 1280 261456 MURFATLAR 1956 399028 NAVODARI 6712 1373464 NEGRU VODA 1108 224300 NICOLAE BALCESCU 1112 224304 OLTINA 467 95227 OSTROV 870 174198 OVIDIU 2819 574507 PANTELIMON 453 92269 PECINEAGA 675 136467 PESTERA 688 138872 POARTA ALBA 1384 280144 RASOVA 782 159206 SACELE 471 93943 SALIGNY 382 78582 SARAIU 229 45493 SEIMENI 401 79705 SILISTEA 316 63428 TARGUSOR
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed W Ind Farm S, Pestera and Cernavoda, Dobrogea Region, Rom Ania Supplem Entary Inform Ation
    Proposed W ind Farm s, Pestera and Cernavoda, Dobrogea Region, Rom ania Supplem entary Inform ation EDP Renewables, Romania April 2010 QM Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks DRAFT REVISED DRAFT REVISED DRAFT Final Date 29 March 2010 1 April 2010 3 April 2010 6 April 2010 Prepared by Delia Gorgos Delia Gorgos Delia Gorgos Delia Gorgos Gary Oliver Gary Oliver Gary Oliver Gary Oliver Tobias Karmstig Tobias Karmstig Tobias Karmstig Tobias Karmstig Jessamy Funnell Jessamy Funnell Jessamy Funnell Jessamy Funnell Signature Checked by Ian Williams Ian Williams Ian Williams Ian Williams Signature Authorised by Isabel Boira- Isabel Boira-Segarra Isabel Boira-Segarra Isabel Boira-Segarra Segarra Signature Project number 12269413-001 12269413-001 12269413-001 12269413-001 File reference EDP Wind farms EDP Wind farms EDP Wind farms EDP Wind farms Supplementary Supplementary Supplementary Supplementary Information Information Report Information Report Information Report Report draft draft 1_4 2010.doc draft 3_4 2010.doc draft 6_4 2010.doc 29_3_2010.doc WSP Environmental UK Mountbatten House Basing View Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 4HJ Tel: +44 (0)1256 318800 Fax: +44 (0)1256 318700 http://www.wspgroup.com Reg. No: 1152332 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Description of the Projects 2 3 Additional Environm ental Assessm ent 16 4 Conclusions 43 5 Lim itations 44 6 References 45 Appendices 47 Appendix A Figures 48 Appendix B List of Abbreviations and Acronym s 55 12269413 -001 Supplementary Information EDP Renewables, Romania WSP Environmental 1 Introduction 1.1 BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT 1.1.1 EDP Renewables (EDPR), Romania propose to develop two wind farms at Pestera and Cernavoda, including associated transport infrastructure, to be located in the Dobrogea Region of Romania (hereafter known as “the Projects”).
    [Show full text]
  • 03.04.2021, Ora 08.00
    RAPORT PRIVIND SITUAŢIA HIDROMETEOROLOGICĂ ŞI A CALITĂŢII MEDIULUI în intervalul 02.04.2021, ora 08.00 – 03.04.2021, ora 08.00 I. SITUAŢIA HIDROMETEOROLOGICĂ 1. Situația și prognoza hidro pe râurile interioare şi Dunăre din 03.04.2021, ora 07.00 RÂURI Debitele au fost, în general, în creștere, ca urmare a precipitațiilor prognozate, cedării apei din stratul de zăpadă și propagării, cu excepția râurilor din bazinele: Bârzava, Moravița, Caraș, Nera, Cerna, Vedea, Jijia, Bârlad, bazinele mijlocii și inferioare ale râurilor Jiu, Olt, Argeș, Ialomița și Prut și pe râurile din Dobrogea, unde debitele au fost relativ staționare. Debitele se situează la valori sub mediile multianuale lunare, cu coeficienți moduli cuprinși între 30-90%, mai mari (în jurul și peste normalele lunare) pe râurile din bazinele hidrografice: Vișeu, Iza, Tur, Crasna, Barcău, Bega, Bârzava, Caraș, Prahova, Suceava, Moldova, Trotuș, bazinul superior al Jiului, bazinul superior și mijlociu al Oltului, cursurile superioare ale Siretului, Putnei, Buzăului și Prutului și pe râurile din Dobrogea şi mai mici (sub 30%) pe râurile din bazinele hidrografice: Bega Veche, Cerna, Bârlad, Jijia şi pe unii afluenți din bazinul mijlociu al Oltului. Este în vigoare ATENȚIONAREA HIDROLOGICĂ nr. 31 din 02.04.2021. În interval a fost emisă o ATENȚIONARE HIDROLOGICĂ pentru fenomene imediate. Nivelurile pe râuri la stațiile hidrometrice se situează în general sub COTELE DE ATENȚIE, exceptând râul Crasna la stația Domănești – jud SM (400+27). Debitele vor fi în creștere, ca urmare a precipitațiilor în curs, a celor prognozate, a cedării apei din stratul de zăpadă și propagării pe râurile din centrul, estul și sudul țării și relativ staționare în rest.
    [Show full text]