Environment and Engineering Department Block 1, Floor 6, Civic Offices Christchurch, Dublin 8

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environment and Engineering Department Block 1, Floor 6, Civic Offices Christchurch, Dublin 8 Environment and Engineering Department Block 1, Floor 6, Civic Offices Christchurch, Dublin 8 An Roinn Comhshaoil agus Innealtóireachta Bloc 1,Urlár 6 Oifigí na Cathrach Teampall Chríost, Baile Átha Cliath 8 To Each Member of the Environment & Engineering Strategic Policy Committee Progress Report on Extreme Event Pluvial Flooding 24th October 2011 Report No. 338/2011 to the November Dublin City Council meeting gave an interim report on the extreme pluvial flooding event which affected the East Coast of Ireland and Dublin City on 24th October 2011. This report and accompanying presentation was considered by the Council at the Monthly Meeting held on 7th November 2011 (Report 338/2011 is appended as Appendix 1 of this report). It was agreed that Emergency Motions 1, 2, 3 (Amended), 8 and Motion 64 from the North Central Area Committee be referred to the Environment and Engineering Strategic Policy Committee for further consideration at a meeting of the SPC scheduled for 15th December 2011. This report is intended to : Brief the SPC on progress since Meeting of City Council on 7th November 2011. Brief SPC on meetings with OPW in relation to Capital Funding for Flood Relief Schemes Address motions referred by Council to SPC. Introduction. This report is to be read as a follow up report to the report No. 338/2011 made to the City Council Meeting on 7th November 2011 covering Dublin Flood Risk and interim report on extreme pluvial flooding event affecting the East Coast and Dublin City on 24th October 2011. The cause of the flooding on 23rd and 24th November was extreme pluvial rainfall which exceeded the capacity of the Drainage system and in turn gave rise to fluvial flooding, which was particularly evident in the River Dodder and in the smaller Dublin Rivers especially in the Camac, Poddle, Wad, Bradog, Zoo Stream. River Catchments do not align with political boundaries and most Dublin Rivers originate in other Local Authority Areas. For this reason flood risk reduction schemes require generally full catchment studies before significant capital works can be constructed. Any significant Capital works must have full regard to EU procurement (Consultants and Contractors), Statutory and Legal Requirements, National Regulations and Environmental compliance as well as meeting National funding requirements. Existing Local Authority staff resources are also significant (see reference in report 338/2011) and additional staff will retire before end February 2012 which will impact on Capital works programmes. All schemes must comply with Environmental Legislation and a full EIA is required for many requiring submission to An Bord Pleanala. For this reason the following timescales are referred to in the report: Short Term works – Works likely to be constructed in 0- 3 years (Subject to funding) Medium Term works – Works likely to be constructed in 3-7 years (Subject to Funding). Long Term works – Works likely to be constructed in 5-11 years (Subject to funding). Progress and activity since 24th October 2011. Strategic issues. 1. Dublin Flood Initiative – Flood Resilient City Project As outlined to Dublin City Council an EU funded Project Flood Resilient Cities is addressing how to adapt to extreme events. Dublin City Council as part of this project is examining the best strategy to protect against the threat of Pluvial flooding. This is the risk of flooding due to extreme event rainfall of an intensity which exceeds the capacity of the drainage system and in many cases results in overland flows of rainwater with consequent risk of flooding. The Dublin City study is due for completion in mid 2012 and will report on : Areas at particular risk of Pluvial Flooding Code of practice for new development to mitigate this risk Code of practice for making existing development more flood resilient. In advance of completion of this study an interim report was commissioned and this interim report and accompanying presentation will brief the SPC in advance of completion of the study in 2012. It is expected that this interim Report will issue in January 2012. In this regard a model has been developed in Scotland by the Scottish Flood Forum that has enabled over 200 Community Flood Groups to plan and prepare for flood events. Recently the Flood Resilient City Office (FRCO) in conjunction with the Central Area Office invited the Scottish Flood Forum to meet with residents in the East Wall area with a view to establishing a Community Resilience Group to deal with floods. This type of model provides individuals and communities with an effective and efficient means of protecting properties from floods by: Establishing local area flood watch systems Establishing awareness of factors contributing to flood risks. Developing local community flood action Minimizing the danger of flooding within the local area. Assisting at times of flooding and supporting people who have experienced flooding to ensure effective support is available to assist recovery. Meeting regularly to ensure that flood preventive methods are being maintained and monitored. Monitoring and reporting to the City Council those areas which are at risk of flooding through lack of maintenance or repair. Raising the awareness of personal and collective actions to limit the occurrences of flooding. Engaging with the City Council and other organisations to reduce the risk of flooding. Developing a local community flood awareness training programme Promoting flood protection equipment and materials to prevent further flooding to property Arranging free surveys of properties and giving specific advice on the most appropriate means of flood protection. Providing advice on the type of protection and suitability of products that will minimize the risk of flooding to properties. Making recommendations on minor repairs to properties that may prevent entry of water. Facilitating substantial reductions in the cost of flood defence products such as flood gates through bulk buying. The City Council will explore the possibility of establishing Flood Resilience Groups in the recently flooded areas as the most appropriate means of facilitating the protection of homes and businesses from flood events. 2. Catchment Flood Risk Assessment and Management Studies (CFRAMS) The SPC has received briefings on works currently underway as part of the Catchment Flood Risk Assessment and Management Studies (CFRAMS). These studies are a key component of Ireland’s response to the EU Floods Directive. The studies will: Identify areas at risk of flooding Propose strategies and works (where possible) to mitigate this risk. Identify flood capital projects Progress these to construction ( Including meeting all relevant Statutory, legal and procurement requirements). To date the flood protection scheme on the River Tolka has been completed and there were no flooding issues associated with the River Tolka on 24th October despite it having the fifth highest recorded flow on record. The River Dodder CFRAM Study is at an advanced stage and will report in 2012 on flood risk and proposed schemes to address risks where possible. Following a meeting held with OPW to consider the flooding on 24th October the OPW are prepared as part of the River Liffey CFRAMS, which is at an early stage and due to report in December 2015 (earliest), to bring forward a study of the Camac River and the Poddle River in order to identify potential improvement schemes. Both these rivers experienced significant flooding and both involve works in more than one Local Authority. Officials are working to see what needs to be examined as part of studies on both rivers and a further report will issue in the new year. The OPW have responsibility for co-ordinating flood works by central Government Agencies and have agreed to discuss with Department of Environment, Community and Local Government (DECLG) how to address schemes which may not fall under OPW remit but which might be eligible for funding under DECLG Water Services Investment Programme (WSIP). This particularly refers to flooding associated with underground “rivers” many of which are fully culverted. In particular flooding associated with River Swan, River Bradog, River Naniken and the Clontarf drainage area have been referred to OPW to determine eligibility for capital funding from the appropriate Government Department. 3. Support from Department of Social Protection A high level Inter Departmental and Inter Agency Working Group has been set up to review the October flood event. Dublin City Council has provided that Committee with full details of all known flooding locations. This information was provided to the Department of Social Protection (DSP) Community Welfare Officers (CWO’s) in order that those affected might have direct access to support and funding provided by the State. Dublin City Area offices have also ensured that the Community welfare Officers are made aware of requests for assistance. Please note that eligibility criteria are attached to this scheme for assistance. 4. Major Emergency Plan The flooding on 23/24 October affected the East Region and included Wicklow, South Dublin County, Dublin City and Monaghan in particular. Dun Laoghaire, Kildare and Fingal were less severely impacted. In accordance with National Framework for Emergency Management HSE, Garda Síochana and Local Authorities worked together in accordance with the Plan and in the case of South Dublin and Dublin City the formal declaration of a major Emergency was made. However, the three Principal Response Agencies were working together before, during and after this declaration. The Major Emergency Plan is published on the City Council website and addresses the strategic response of the three Principal Response Agencies only. Operational responses are in accordance with the operational plans of Principal Emergency services. Meetings have taken place with Garda and HSE to review at Strategic level the Major Emergency Plan response. In addition an intra Departmental workshop is taking place on 13th December to review operational level responses to pluvial flood risk. Both of these are intended to identify actions for the City and Local Communities and will be reported to future meeting of SPC.
Recommended publications
  • Agenda Document for North Central Area Committee, 21/01/2019 11:00
    NOTIFICATION TO ATTEND MEETING OF THE NORTH CENTRAL AREA COMMITTEE TO BE HELD IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM - NORTHSIDE CIVIC CENTRE ON MONDAY 21 JANUARY 2019 AT 11.00 AM AGENDA MONDAY 21 JANUARY 2019 PAGE 1 Minutes of the North Central Area Committee Meeting held on 10th December, 5 - 8 2018 (Attached herewith) 2 Questions to the Area Manager 9 - 18 (Report herewith) 3 Area Matters a GoAhead Bus, Ireland - Discussion on the 17A Bus Route (Verbal Report) – Patrick Ellis (Operations Manager), Derry O'Leary (Transport Consultant), Nicola Gordon (Head of Stakeholder Relations) b The future of Darndale Football Club 19 - 28 (Report herewith) (Thomas “High Tower” Daly) c Belmayne Main Street and Belmayne Avenue Part 8 29 - 30 (Report herewith) Karen Kennedy / Robert Kelly will be available to take any Councillors questions. d Planning application for Griffith Avenue 31 - 40 (Presentation) (ABP reference #: ABP-303296-18). Description: Residential Development - Construction of 385 no. residential units - Carol Smyth e "Social Housing PPP Project - Introduction to Comhar Housing Representatives" - Brian Clarke (Sisk -Contracts Manager) Garry Keegan (IPC - Tenant Liaison) (Verbal Report) Mary Davis / James Nolan - Ayrfield Site f Update for St. Monica's Development & Boxing Club 41 - 44 (Reports herewith) Paul Clegg & Elaine Mulvenny g Sports & Wellbeing Partnership Area Committee Report 45 - 52 (Report herewith) h Housing Supply Report 53 - 78 (Report herewith) i Naming and numbering proposal for a new residential development on the 79 - 82 site of 778-784 Howth Road, Dublin 5- 1-68 Strand View, Howth Road, Dublin 5. (Report herewith) – Elaine Mulvenny 4 Roads & Traffic Matters a Minutes of the TAG meeting held on 18th December, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT RSES- NWRA NATURA IMPACT REPORT (NIR) Northern and Western Region RSES ‐ NIR
    DRAFT RSES- NWRA NATURA IMPACT REPORT (NIR) Northern and Western Region RSES ‐ NIR TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 SCOPE OF THE NIR .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 APPROACH TO NATURA IMPACT REPORT PREPARATION ........................................................................ 2 1.3 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT FOR APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT ......................................................................... 2 2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 4 2.1 GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS ON AA ........................................................................................................ 4 2.2 GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND CASE LAW ................................................................................................. 5 2.3 PURPOSE OF THE AA PROCESS ......................................................................................................... 5 2.4 STAGES OF APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 6 2.5 INFORMATION SOURCES CONSULTED ................................................................................................. 7 2.6 IMPACT PREDICTION ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Board Order ABP-307444-20
    Board Order ABP-307444-20 Planning and Development Acts 2000 to 2019 Planning Authority: Dublin City Council Application for permission under section 4 of the Planning and Development (Housing) and Residential Tenancies Act 2016, in accordance with plans and particulars, lodged with An Bord Pleanála on the 16th day of October 2019 by Crekav Trading GP Limited care of Brady Shipman Martin, Canal House, Canal Road, Dublin. Proposed Development: A 10-year planning permission for a strategic housing development located at circa 6.7-hectare site located on lands east of St. Paul’s College, Sybil Hill Road, Raheny, Dublin 5. The site is bound to the north, east and south by St Anne’s Park and to the west by residential development at The Meadows, Sybil Hill House (a protected structure) and St. Paul’s College. Vehicular access to the site is from Sybil Hill Road. The proposed development will consist of: 1. The construction of a residential development with a gross floor area of circa 65,125 square metres (excluding basement parking areas) set out in nine number blocks, ranging in height from five to nine storeys to accommodate 657 number apartments, residential tenant amenity spaces and a crèche. The site will accommodate 499 number car parking spaces, 1,646 number bicycle parking spaces, storage, services and plant areas. Landscaping will include extensive communal amenity areas, and a significant public open space provision. ABP-307444-20 Board Order Page 1 of 22 2. The nine number residential buildings range in height from five storeys to nine storeys accommodating 657 number apartments comprising: • 224 number one-bed units, • 378 number two-bed units and • 55 number three-bed units.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Guide to Three Dublin City Woodlands
    A SHORT GUIDE TO THREE DUBLIN CITY WOODLANDS St. Anne’s Park Tolka Valley Park Bushy Park Contents Introduction 2 A Brief History of Forests in Ireland 3 Woodland Habitats 7 Woodlands in Dublin City Parks 9 References 22 Above: A field layer in Bushy Park. Photo by Ludovic Beaumont Team Leslie Moore, City Parks Superintendent Maryann Harris, Senior Executive Parks and Landscape Officer Lorraine Bull, Biodiversity Officer Ludovic Beaumont, Tree Officer This Booklet was funded by the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage through the National Parks and Wildlife Service’s National Biodiversity Action Plan Fund. It is also an action of the Dublin City Biodiversity Action Plan (2016-2020), and the Dublin City Tree Strategy Front cover: St. Anne’s Park. Photograph by Anthony Woods (2016-2021). Above: Beech trees, Bushy park. Photograph by Ludovic Beaumont 1 Introduction A Brief History of Forests in Ireland The lands surrounding Dublin Bay were originally heavily wooded After the last Ice Age (10,000 BP), Ireland before the city was developed. One of Dublin’s Irish names was was initially covered in tundra-like Droom-Choll-Coil that is, “the brow of a hazel-wood”, from an vegetation. As the climate started to abundance of those trees growing about it. warm up 10,000 years ago, the seeds of trees that originated from southern and Woodlands are places visually dominated by trees and urban central Europe were brought to Ireland woodland can be defined as all of the woodlands within the boundary by birds and through wind dispersal of a town or city.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study Final Strategy Report ______
    Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study Final Strategy Report __________________________________________________________________________________________ Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study Final Strategy Report Document Title Final Strategy Report Volume 1 – Main Report Volume 2 – Appendices Document Ref (s): GDSDS/NE02057/035C Date Edition/Rev Status Originator Checked Approved 28/05/04 A Draft N Fleming J Grant M Hand M Edger C O’Keeffe 06/08/2004 B Draft N Fleming J Grant M Hand M Edger C O’Keeffe 27/04/2005 C Final N Fleming J Grant M Hand M Edger C O’Keeffe Contracting Authority (CA) Personnel Council Area Council Name Operations Manager Office Location Project Engineer Name Telephone No. Operations Manager Name Telephone No. This report has been prepared for the Contracting Authority in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment for the Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study dated 23rd May 2001. The McCarthy Hyder MCOS Joint Venture cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ GDSDS/NEO2057/035C April 2005 Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study Final Strategy Report __________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................6 1.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Tolka Valley Park Mammals
    THE MAMMAL FAUNA OF THE TOLKA VALLEY PARK AN INITIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE RESIDENT FAUNA For Fingal County Council, Parks Department Daubenton’s bat in bridge over the River Tolka. (c) Brian Keeley 2003 Brian Keeley B.Sc. Hons. in Zool. Mammalogist November 2003 INTRODUCTION It is acknowledged by all environmentalists and ecologists that in order to ensure that native fauna may flourish, it is essential that there is a mechanism for continuity provided for interchange between naturally accessible parts of the species’ range. For many mammals, this means of continuity is provided in two main ways: vegetation corridors (hedgerow, trees, scrub) and waterways. Tolka Valley Park provides a link between suburban and rural areas of Fingal. The river itself creates a natural channel for the movement of aquatic or semi-aquatic mammals. The riverside vegetation and the remnant greenery that has survived on the flood plain of the river serves as the vegetation corridor, dwelling and resting place for mammals necessary to sustain and allow the movement of these survivors of increasing urbanisation. To appreciate what the resident fauna of this relatively new park is, it is necessary to examine the site in a number of ways. Different mammals are located by the use of different techniques. This current assessment looked at the bat fauna and the non-volant fauna by different means. Bats were sought during the summer period by means of a bat detector survey. Non-volant mammals were investigated by a walk-through of the Park to identify their tracks etc. rather than any visual determinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fingal Development Plan 2017-2023
    April_Adopted_Flood_Cover_crop.pdf 1 29/03/2017 14:35:07 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for the Fingal Development Plan 2017-2023 March 2017 SFRA - Fingal County Development Plan 2017-2023 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 REPORT OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 DISCLAIMER & BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION ..................................................................................... 1 1.3.1 Disclaimer .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3.2 Best Available Information ................................................................................................ 2 1.4 REPORT STRUCTURE ......................................................................................................................... 3 2 STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 WATERCOURSES.............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B. List of Special Areas of Conservation and Special Protection Areas
    Appendix B. List of Special Areas of Conservation and Special Protection Areas Irish Water | Draft Framework Plan. Natura Impact Statement Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) in the Republic of Ireland Site code Site name 000006 Killyconny Bog (Cloghbally) SAC 000007 Lough Oughter and Associated Loughs SAC 000014 Ballyallia Lake SAC 000016 Ballycullinan Lake SAC 000019 Ballyogan Lough SAC 000020 Black Head-Poulsallagh Complex SAC 000030 Danes Hole, Poulnalecka SAC 000032 Dromore Woods and Loughs SAC 000036 Inagh River Estuary SAC 000037 Pouladatig Cave SAC 000051 Lough Gash Turlough SAC 000054 Moneen Mountain SAC 000057 Moyree River System SAC 000064 Poulnagordon Cave (Quin) SAC 000077 Ballymacoda (Clonpriest and Pillmore) SAC 000090 Glengarriff Harbour and Woodland SAC 000091 Clonakilty Bay SAC 000093 Caha Mountains SAC 000097 Lough Hyne Nature Reserve and Environs SAC 000101 Roaringwater Bay and Islands SAC 000102 Sheep's Head SAC 000106 St. Gobnet's Wood SAC 000108 The Gearagh SAC 000109 Three Castle Head to Mizen Head SAC 000111 Aran Island (Donegal) Cliffs SAC 000115 Ballintra SAC 000116 Ballyarr Wood SAC 000129 Croaghonagh Bog SAC 000133 Donegal Bay (Murvagh) SAC 000138 Durnesh Lough SAC 000140 Fawnboy Bog/Lough Nacung SAC 000142 Gannivegil Bog SAC 000147 Horn Head and Rinclevan SAC 000154 Inishtrahull SAC 000163 Lough Eske and Ardnamona Wood SAC 000164 Lough Nagreany Dunes SAC 000165 Lough Nillan Bog (Carrickatlieve) SAC 000168 Magheradrumman Bog SAC 000172 Meenaguse/Ardbane Bog SAC 000173 Meentygrannagh Bog SAC 000174 Curraghchase Woods SAC 000181 Rathlin O'Birne Island SAC 000185 Sessiagh Lough SAC 000189 Slieve League SAC 000190 Slieve Tooey/Tormore Island/Loughros Beg Bay SAC 000191 St.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Anne's Park – Location
    ST. ANNE’S PARK – LOCATION St. Anne’s Park is situated between the suburbs of Raheny and Clontarf. The park is surrounded on three sides by mature residential housing, most of which is made up of detached and semi-detached private single family dwellings dating from the mid part of the twentieth century, with some more recent apartment buildings from the late twentieth/early twenty-first centuries. The fourth side of the park extends along the coast at James Larkin Road, overlooking North Bull Island and Dublin Bay. It is bisected by the course of the Naniken River, which flows eastwards into the sea near the artificial pond at the Herculanean Temple, one of the park’s well-known follies. St. Anne’s Park has numerous pedestrian entrances around its perimeter, and parking facilities at the Red Stables entrance on Mount Prospect Avenue, Clontarf Road and All Saint’s Road. Aspects of the wider area include: North Bull Island Nature Reserve (part of the UNESCO Dublin Bay Biosphere) Dollymount Strand S2S coastal greenway (walking & cycle route, section from Sutton to Fairview) Raheny and Clontarf village centres local businesses, shops, pubs, cafés and restaurants various communities and community groups schools (numerous primary and second-level) religious communities and places of worship sports clubs and organisations other parks and recreational spaces ST. ANNE’S PARK – TODAY St. Anne’s Park is a 107 hectare (265 acre) public park located approx. 6.5km (4 miles) north-east of Dublin city centre. It is the second-largest municipal park in Dublin and the largest owned and operated by Dublin City Council.
    [Show full text]
  • National Broadband Plan Ireland’S Broadband Intervention Natura Impact Statement 2018 National Broadband Plan - Intervention Strategy
    National Broadband Plan Ireland’s Broadband Intervention Natura Impact Statement 2018 National Broadband Plan - Intervention Strategy Appropriate Assessment Natura Impact Statement October 2018 rpsgroup.com/ireland Natura Impact Statement (NIS) for the National Broadband Plan Intervention Strategy TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 APPROACH TO NIS PREPARATION ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 LAYOUT OF NIS .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT FOR APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT ......................................................................... 2 1.4 PURPOSE OF THE AA PROCESS ......................................................................................................... 3 1.5 OVERLAP WITH THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE NBP ............................................ 3 1.6 CONSULTATION .............................................................................................................................. 4 2 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW OF THE NBP INTERVENTION STRATEGY ............................. 9 2.1 NATIONAL BROADBAND PLAN (NBP) ................................................................................................. 9 2.2 NBP INTERVENTION STRATEGY ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Title Giving Rights to the River Tolka Thesis
    IRELAND’S RIVER NETWORKS TOLKA RIVER AND CATCHMENT THESIS TITLE SOURCE: Dunshaughlin, Co Meath GIVING RIGHTS TO THE RIVER TOLKA 57km TOTAL LENGTH DUBLIN MEATH CATCHMENT AREA 14,150ha 140m DROP OVER THE COURSE MOUTH: THESIS STATEMENT Dublin Bay, Co Dublin Landscape architects must address the impaired and threatened Irish water channels and bridge the link for a much needed urban-ecological framework LAND TOPOGRAPHY LAND USES Starting upstream towards the source of the River Tolka, the river is stream like Both urban and rural stages of the rivers course contributes to the degraded state of the making it more vulnerable to the harmful impacts occurring in the surrounding river Tolka. It is important to look at the harmful impacts as a whole and not blame one over environments. the other. Agricultural activity primarily takes place upstream where the river is extremely vulnerable. URBAN GREEN A B C MOTIVATION D The River Tolka over the past two centuries has not SETTLEMENTS changed drastically in its course but its health has E deteriorated significantly. Once a river polluted with fish is now polluted with waste due to urban activity, from F fertilizers of agricultural land leaching in, to direct waste pumping into the watercourse. The conditions of the river Small streams are highly vulnerable to pollution and other human induced are not meeting the EU standards, despite being brought disturbances because of their high connectivity with adjacent land. to court over the matter where the Irish Water pleaded Threats: guilty to offences under the Water Waste Discharge. The Low dilution capacity river had a major fish kill in 2018, European Commission Vulnerability to channel modification TILLAGE gave Ireland repeated warnings and little resolution has Vulnerability to environmental change been made for these ongoing issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding of No Significant Effects Report
    Finding of no significant effects report: Name of project or plan: The installation of aviation fuel pipeline across the River Tolka at Alfie Byrne Road, East Wall, Dublin (FS005704) Name and location of Natura 2000 site: The location of the proposed works is not within a designated Natura 2000 site but is located approximately 300m from the nearest boundary of the South Dublin Bay and River Tolka SPA (Site Code 004024) and approximately 3.3Km from the nearest boundary of the North Dublin Bay SAC (Site Code 000206) South Dublin Bay and River Tolka SPA The South Dublin Bay and River Tolka Estuary SPA comprises a substantial part of Dublin Bay. It includes the intertidal area between the River Liffey and Dun Laoghaire, and the estuary of the River Tolka to the north of the River Liffey, as well as Booterstown Marsh. A portion of the shallow marine waters of the bay is also included. The site is a Special Protection Area (SPA) under the E.U. Birds Directive, of special conservation interest for the following species: Light-bellied Brent Goose, Oystercatcher, Ringed Plover, Grey Plover, Knot, Sanderling, Dunlin, Bar-tailed Godwit, Redshank, Black- headed Gull, Roseate Tern, Common Tern and Arctic Tern. The E.U. Birds Directive pays particular attention to wetlands, and as these form part of the SPA, the site and its associated waterbirds are of special conservation interest for Wetland & Waterbirds. The Conservation Objectives of the South Dublin Bay and River Tolka SPA are1 To maintain the favourable conservation condition of Light-bellied
    [Show full text]