UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY VISION 2030

APPENDIX November 2020 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix NOTES ON DATA

• Data: This appendix contains slides that depict every trend analyzed as part of the Vision 2030 process. Table of contents on page 3 organizes where a given data point can be accessed • Prioritizing Local Sources: Wherever possible U3 Advisors tried to utilize “on-the-ground data” collected by local entities (i.e PGPD, PGC, TDC, etc.) over national datasets (Census, etc.). These localized datasets provide a more accurate picture of College Park, whereas most national datasets are temporally staggered or provide sample-level data. • Benchmark Years: The benchmark years are 2011 and 2019; however, some data is only reported up to 2018, or does not extent back to 2011. We will make notes when this is the case

2 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix TABLE OF CONTENTS

Housing & Development……………………..……………… 4

Transportation……………………………. …………………… 14

Public Safety …………………………………………………… 23

Education………………………………………………………… 37

Sustainability…………………………………………………… 59

3 HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT

4 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source (2011 to 2018): Census On The Map, LEHD datasets. Source (Discovery District): Company data tracked by TDC Source (UMD): Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment EXPANDING WORKFORCE Source: City of College Park; Dun & Bradstreet for additional information

Estimated Job Growth 2018 Growth Since Small Business Growth (latest estimate) 20111 % of Businesses that are local and independently owned* Total** 26,800 +3,260 (14%) 2011 2019 University of MD 14,505 +822 (6%) Excluding Graduate Assistants 10,314 +676 (7%) 63% 67% Discovery District College Park is becoming a better environment for small, independently owned businesses ~1,000 new jobs since 2017

15 New Private Companies 8 UMD Affiliated Ventures Hall CP Adobe Applied Research for Intelligence Growth in Retail/Dining and Security WeWork Immuta National Foreign Language Between 2011 and 2019, College Park added at Capital One Tech Center Cybrary least 52 new retail and dining businesses for a net Incubator National Consortium for Study of gain of 25 businesses AST Airgility Terrorism Dingman Center Aerothreads BlueVoyant Do Good Accelerator Independent > Chain Newton Inky Terrapin Development Co 75-90%* College Park of these new retail and dining businesses Loccioni USA Inc Academy Division of Information Tech were independently owned IIC Technologies UM Ventures *Local and independently owned includes businesses headquartered in College Park, or small regional *UMD growth data from 2012; total jobs data from 2011 chains with operations in a few cities in the immediate region **Largely inclusive of numerous federal agencies at Discovery District **90% is the actual calculation when using the City’s business list; however, we recognize this dataset more carefully tracks small/independent businesses and may undercount new chains/national operations 5 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source (2011 to 2019): Prince George’s County Property datasets; accessed through Prince George’s County Open Data Portal; UMD GROWTH IN HOUSING dormitory taken from IPEDS

New multi- New multi- Multi-Family Built Since 2011 +2,000 family units +5,000 family beds 2011 2019 MF Property

8,000 9,950 Mazza Total Units by Type (2019)

Single Family, Apartments Monument Village Attached, and Student Focused* Townhomes ~2,304 (~23%) ~4,356 (~44%) Enclave at 8,700

~3,029 The Alloy (~30%) Apartments Multi-Family/Mixed The Varsity Apartments Subsidized ~260 (3%) Domain Growth in Apartments Since 2011 (includes Mazza Grandmarc and Varsity in 2019 but not 2011) Landmark Apartments Apartments (Student Focused Buildings*) (Other Multi Family and Mixed Use) Te r r a p i n Ro w ~1,450 new units ~500 new units (+130% since 2011) (+18% since 2011)

+585 additional units in Greenbelt and Hyattsville * Defined as building built for the purpose of students alone. Including University Club; Graduate 6 +UMD’s dormitory capacity increased by ~1,200 Gardens; Mazza Grandmarc; Enclave at 8700; University View II; The Varsity; Landmark; Terrapin Row Source (2011 to 2019): Prince George’s County Property datasets; University Community Vision 2030: Appendix accessed through Prince George’s County Open Data Portal SINGLE FAMILY CONVERSIONS Camden

% of Single Family properties that are owner occupied Sunnyside 2011 2019 Owner Occupied Homes that shifted to rental (2011-2019) Hollywood Cherry HIlls ~71% ~68% Properties Methodology: • Property records from Prince George’s County and MD Real Property Databases • Flag all single family properties • Flag homes identified as “owner occupied” through participation in homestead CP Woods tax program for 2019 and 2011 Daniel’s Park Who is Buying: While overall decline between 2011-2019 was modest, recent Crystal Oak Springs investor activity suggests an increase in influence of non local entities Springs 15% of rental properties owned by out of state entities (up from 11% in 2011)

68% of rental properties owned by non College Park entities (up from 60% in 2011) Berwyn

% of Single Family properties that are owner occupied by neighborhood % 2011 % 2019 Lakeland Hollywood 78% 77% Daniels Park 70% 69% CP Estates CP Woods 81% 75% Berwyn 61% 59% Old Town Calvert Hills 71% 70% Calvert CP Estates 88% 85% Manor

Crystal Springs 43% 41% Calvert Hills Sunnyside 87% 90% Old Town 21% 19% Lakeland* 36% 35% * Includes Alden Berkley Properties 7 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: Apartments.Com; website for individual properties that qualify; Zillow sample for SF rentals Source: CoStar Multi-family student/market housing COST OF RENTAL HOUSING report for College Park, Mont. Co. Prince George’s Co.

Multi-Family Housing

BUILT 2010 OR LATER BUILT PRE 2010 Avg 1 Bedroom $1,820 $1,260 Avg 2 Bedroom $2,260 $1,510

Newly constructed market housing is 47% more expensive than older apartment units Student Housing

BUILT 2010 OR LATER BUILT PRE 2010 Avg 1 Br $1,700 $1,150 Avg 2 Bedroom $2,500 $1,900

Newly constructed student housing is 40% more expensive than older apartment units Single Family Rentals College Park Student Housing AVERAGE Occupancy: 99% Avg 1 Bedroom $750 Avg 2 Bedroom $1,350 College Park Market Housing Newly constructed student/market housing can be as much 70% Occupancy: 93% more expensive than renting a room in a converted single family 8 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix COST OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IN COLLEGE PARK

The median sale price for homes in Sunnyside College Park… Camden Median Sale Properties Price Sampled Hollywood

Hollywood $299,250 36 Cherry HIlls Daniels Park $318,450 24

Berwyn $330,000 16 Adelphi CP Woods CP Estates $369,900 13 Daniel’s Park Greenbelt Old Town $695,000* 13 CP Woods $355,000 11 Oak Springs Crystal Calvert Hills $479,250 10 Springs Lakeland $296,000 10 Sunnyside $303,000 7 Berwyn Yarrow $421,000 6 Berwyn Heights UMD Crystal Springs $300,000 5 Lakeland Oak Springs $300,000 4

CP Estates Calvert Old Town Manor Calvert Hills

U Park Sale Price

Chillium<$300K Riverdale Park $300K - $400K Hyattsville $400K - $500K *Likely conflated by sale of homes used as rental properties Data Source: Sample of home sales manually downloaded from Zillow and >$500K East Riverdale mapped in GIS (January 2020) 9 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix UMD FACULTY & STAFF

KEY NOTES ON UMD DATA

• Data provided by UMD was “de-identified” (no actual addresses shared) for security purposes • Analysts can see the general location of a student/employee but not the actual address • Employee locations are likely 100% accurate, as employees tend to report their current homes • Graduates and undergraduates living in College Park will likely be somewhat under-reported, as students may report their parent’s address. There is no way of telling if an off campus address is: A) Where their parents live; B) Where they live during the semester

Total College Park College Park (2018) (2018) (2011) 4,556 5.9% 4.1% faculty (270) In 2011 In College Park

5,676 4.8% 4.7% staff (272) In 2011 In College Park

10,232 5.3% 4.5% Total (542) In 2011 employees In College Park

Source: UMD, April 2018 ; Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment (IRPA) 10 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix UMD GRADUATE STUDENTS OFF CAMPUS

Total College Park College Park (2018) (2018) (2011) 10,438 23% 18% Live off campus In College Park In 2011

Note: Number of graduates living within College Park is likely underreported as some students provided addresses for mapping that are clearly outside of a commutable distance

Source: UMD, April 2018 ; Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment (IRPA) 11 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix UMD UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS OFF CAMPUS

Total College Park College Park (2018) (2018) (2011) 16,600 13% 11% Live off campus In College Park In 2011 (clearly underreported)

Note: Number of undergraduates living within College Park is likely underreported as some students provided addresses for mapping that are clearly outside of a commutable distance.

Source: UMD, April 2018 ; Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment (IRPA) 12 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix UMD UNDERGADUATE STUDENTS OFF CAMPUS

Goal: Understand the % of off-campus undergraduates living west of Route 1 and south of Metzerott

2011 2019 ~45% ~61%

Methodology: • Using sample data provided in 2018 and 2011: • Assume students are 100% of rentals in student housing • Assume students occupy ~60% of multi- family units; 70% of single-family rental units • Identify the proportion of these unit types that exist within the target geography

Source: UMD, April 2018 ; Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment (IRPA) 13 TRANSPORTATION

14 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix COMMUTING BY COLLEGE PARK RESIDENTS Source: ACS 5 Year Summary2018; 2011 Commute means to work

How do College Park Residents Commute to Work

Working residents over 25 increased car usage, with slight increases in transit

Working residents under 25 decreased their car usage and increased walking

Residents 25 and Older Residents 24 and Younger (60% of working residents) (40% of working residents)

2018 66% 15% 4% 31% 12% 5% 42% 4%

4% 2011 13% 11% 4% 38% 60% 8% 38%

Drove Alone Taxi, Bike, Motorcycle Public Transit Walk 15 Source: WMATA, MTA, Prince George County “The Bus” University Community Vision 2030: Appendix DECLINING TRANSIT RIDERSHIP

• Ridership has declined for all lines that Key Note: High probability that Covid-19 outbreak will augment these declines service College Park, excepting the MARC & UMD shuttle. % Change in Ridership Since 2011 Ridership increased • This decline is reflective of broader since 2011 MARC - Camden regional declines, though somewhat more pronounced for College Park MARC - Total Ridership Change (2011 to 2019) Entire College Park Serving System WMATA Busses -21.5% -19% WMATA Rail -22% -14%

Prince George WMATA – All Rail -36% -35% “The Bus” WMATA – All Bus MTA MARC +15% +15%

UM Shuttle Rides Increasing Ridership decreased WMATA – since 2011 – CP Busses 3.3M +11% Green Line Annual ridership of UM Change since 2011 shuttle 2019 The Bus – All

Though the number of passes for non UMD affiliated people has The Bus – 14,17 declined by over 60%

16 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix KEY NOTES ON RIDERSHIP Source: WMATA, MTA, Prince George County “The Bus”

Drivers of TheBus & WMATA TheBus WMATA Ridership Decline • Service • • Transit Vision 2030 seeks to assess • Rail: Strategic investments, service reliability, Consistent delays community issues with infrequency of stops customer responsiveness, and affordable fares • Single-tracking and issues of timing have stabilized declining ridership; evidence • Crowded or full train cars • Route 14: points that ridership may steadily climb back • Shutdowns with no alternative • Short Term: up after 2020 • Limited weekend schedule • Improved frequency (40 to 30 • Long-term repairs (SafeTrack): • Bus: Bus continues to decline at a system level; minutes) • Reduced service hours • customers indicate frustrations with with traffic, Long Term: • • slow travel times, and infrequency of stops: Reduced train frequency Extend service to Saturday • • Extend weekday hours to 9 PM • However, College Park-serving buses Safety • Route 17 have seen a slight uptick in ridership in • Frequent fires • Short Term the last year, contrary to the system as a • Safety violations • Improve frequency (30 to 20 whole • Overdue maintenance minutes) • Fares • Extend weekday hours to 9 PM • Increases in rush-hour fees & • Extend service to Saturday UMD Shuttle per-mile trip fees • Extend line to Greenbelt Metro • Telecommuting • Long Term: • • Extend weekday hours to 10 PM Expansion of teleworking options • UMD Shuttle: UMD shuttle riderership • Alternate Transit increased 11% between 2011 and 2019. • Biking & bike share However, the number of passes for non-UMD • Uber & Lyft affiliated people has declined by over 60% 17 Source: Census On The Map University Community Vision 2030: Appendix COMMUTING TO / FROM Commuter Clusters COLLEGE PARK In and Out of College Park

~25,400 ~1,600 ~13,350 workers residents residents Beltsville commute in work in CP commute out* Silver Spring

Bethesda College Park 10.9% Increase from Residents live and 9.6% in 2011 work in College Park Washington, People who LIVE in People who WORK in DC College Park College Park Commute Hyattsville Commute TO… FROM… Washington DC 17.1% 7.1% Baltimore 3.4% 2.1% Beltsville 3.2% <1% Rockville 2.8% <1% Bethesda 2.6% <1% Columbia 1.9% 2.6% Silver Spring 1.6% 3.5% Fewer More Greenbelt <1% 2% Commuters Commuters Bowie <1% 1.9% 18 *Derived by multiplying the % in/out figures from the Census LEHD dataset against the workforce data from ACS 18 Source: Census On The Map University Community Vision 2030: Appendix COMMUTING TO / FROM Commuter Clusters COLLEGE PARK • Purple LINE creates key connectivity for Silver Spring/Bethesda • Communities along the Purple Line connect ~10% of College Park commuters directly Beltsville Silver Spring • Given that Ridership on the WMATA is down regionally, will the key to a successful Purple Bethesda College Park Line be intensive branding and TOD?

Washington, People who LIVE in People who WORK in DC College Park College Park Commute Hyattsville Commute TO… FROM… Washington DC 17.1% 7.1% Baltimore 3.4% 2.1% Beltsville 3.2% <1% Rockville 2.8% <1% Bethesda 2.6% <1% Columbia 1.9% 2.6% Silver Spring 1.6% 3.5% Greenbelt <1% 2%

Bowie <1% 1.9% Fewer More Commuters Commuters 19 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix COMMUTING IN OTHER REGIONAL HUBS

College Park Bethesda Rockville

~25,400 ~1,600 ~13,350 ~54,000 ~4,600 ~28,200 ~75,800 ~6,130 ~30,000 workers residents residents workers residents residents workers residents residents commute in work in CP commute out* commute in work in CP commute out* commute in work in CP commute out*

10.9% 14.0% 17.0% Residents live and Residents live and Residents live and work in College Park work in Bethesda work in Rockville Silver Spring Columbia Bowie

~26,600 ~2,900 ~43,200 ~57,400 ~11,200 ~46,200 ~14,900 ~1,700 ~30,110 workers residents residents workers residents residents workers residents residents commute in work in CP commute out* commute in work in CP commute out* commute in work in CP commute out*

6.3% 19.6% 5.3% Residents live and Residents live and Residents live and work in Silver Spring work in Columbia work in Bowie 20

*Derived by multiplying the % in/out figures from the Census LEHD dataset against the workforce data from ACS Source: Census On The Map University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Sources: LEHD On the Map Home and Work Area Profile Analysis 2017; Prince PURPLE LINE – WALKSHED ANALYSIS George’s County Open Data

PEOPLE & WORKERS WITHIN A 10-20 MINUTE WALK (CP Stations) Greenbelt 10-Minute Walkshed 20-Minute Walkshed PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY Station # People # Workers # People # Workers Adelphi 573 3,812 3,519 18,374 Baltimore Ave 945 14,294 2,848 15,780 Campus Drive 693 12,911 2,505 18,681 College Park 335 558 1,524 15,671 Greenbelt 946 189 2,136 976 All Green Line 1,281 750 3,660 16,650 Adelphi Baltimore Ave Stations Combined Campus All Purple Line 1,985 18,657 5,235 21,246 Drive Stations Combined All College Park 2,931 18,846 7,371 22,222 Stations Combined College Park

Walkshed: The land area within a defined walking range of a specified location

Purple Line UMD Campus Green Line 20-Minute Walkshed College Park 10-Minute Walkshed 21 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix PEDESTRIAN SAFETY

The Map shows off-campus accidents in which a pedestrian was struck, as tracked by UMD Rossborough and Baltimore 10 4 incidents in 2011/2012 9 8 7 6 5 4 Knox and 3 Baltimore 2 3 incidents in 2018 1 0 2019 2018 2012 2011

Pedestrian struck – 2011 and 2012

Pedestrian struck – 2018 and 2019 Pedestrian accidents reported by PGPD not shown/tracked. PGPD was not able to provide comparable crash data between 2011 and 2019, or provide data that differentiated by the type of accident occurring 22 PUBLIC SAFETY

23 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix PUBLIC SAFETY & HEALTH

Public Health • Alcohol and Nuisance Violations: Synthesizing data from the Office of Student Conduct, Liquor Board, Department of Public Services, UMPD, PGPD, and the Metro Police Department to understand how alcohol and nuisance violations have decreased/increased over time. Data reported only for College Park

Public Safety • Overall Crime and Public Safety: Synthesizing current data from PGPD to understand overall crime levels in College Park and how this relates to perceptions of crime. Data reported only for College Park

24 Source: UMPD Daily Incident Logs 2011 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix and 2019 PUBLIC HEALTH: NUISANCE OFFENSES

Nuisance Offenses Alcohol, disorderly conduct, and vandalism violations decreased between 66% and 72% from 2011 to 2019; while UMPD-reported DUIs are still relatively high, we suspect the vast majority of these are non-student related. Includes on and off-campus reports. PGPD alcohol, disorderly conduct, and vandalism violations decreased by ~58% between 2011 and 2019 (off-campus College Park only). Metro Police alcohol, disorderly conduct, and vandalism violations decreased by ~90% between 2011 and 2019 (off-campus College Park station only).

UMPD PGPD Metro Police

283 300 265 300 90 81 249 250 250 80 210208 70 200 174 200 166 60 50 150 124 150 50 40 100 100 30 61 60 50 37 49 20 12 50 17 50 29 26 4 1 4 1 10 0 1 1 0 0 0 Alcohol & Destruction of Disorderly DUI DUI Drug Property Conduct

Drugs/Narcotics Drugs/Narcotics Alcohol Violations Alcohol Violations Disorderly Conduct Disorderly Conduct Destruction/Vandalism Destruction/Vandalism

2011 2019 2011 2019 2011 2018

Data: UMPD 25 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: UMPD and PGPD data mapped in GIS NUISANCES BY GEOGRAPHY

2011 2019 These maps show all nuisance violations* reported by UMPD Camden Camden and PGPD in 2011 vs 2019 Sunnyside Sunnyside

2011 2019 Cherry Hills Cherry Hills Old Town 153 45 Hollywood Hollywood Calvert Manor 45 13 CP Woods CP Woods Hollywood 27 18 Daniel’s Park Daniel’s Park

Lakeland 27 7 Oak Springs Oak Springs Crystal Crystal Berwyn 21 11 Springs Springs Daniels Park 15 23 Berwyn Berwyn Calvert Hills 15 5 Cherry Hill 11 15 Oak Springs 10 4 Lakeland Lakeland

CP Woods 9 2 CP Estates CP Estates

Camden 7 10 Calvert Calvert Old Town Old Town Manor Manor Sunnyside 6 3 CP Estates 4 1 Calvert Hills Calvert Hills

Fewer More Incidents Incidents *Defined as alcohol/drunkenness, disorderly conduct, and vandalism/destruction of property 26 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: Department of Public Services CITY (PUBLIC SERVICES) NOISE COMPLAINTS

Overall calls and warnings have decreased by 45% and 17%, respectively, since 2012. Infractions have ticked up since 2012, but dropped significant from peaks in 2015/2016

FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 675 Calls 444 Calls 627 Calls 596 Calls 528 Calls 510 Calls 466 Calls 370 Calls 140 337 Warnings 279 Warnings 352 Warnings 346 Warnings 272 Warnings 291 Warnings 234 Warnings 208 Warnings 24 Infractions 36 Infractions 38 Infractions 39 Infractions 61 Infractions 25 Infractions 33 Infractions 33 Infractions 120

100

80

60

40

20

0 Jul-11 Jul-12 Jul-13 Jul-14 Jul-15 Jul-16 Jul-17 Jul-18 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-16 Jan-17 Jan-18 Jan-19 Sep-11 Sep-12 Sep-13 Sep-14 Sep-15 Sep-16 Sep-17 Sep-18 Mar-12 Mar-13 Mar-14 Mar-15 Mar-16 Mar-17 Mar-18 Mar-19 Nov-11 Nov-12 Nov-13 Nov-14 Nov-15 Nov-16 Nov-17 Nov-18 May-12 May-13 May-14 May-15 May-16 May-17 May-18 May-19

Calls Warnings Infractions 27 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: Liquor Control Board BUSINESSES SELLING TO MINORS

Sale to or Possession by Underage Persons

2016-2019: The 20+ violations that occurred during this time came from 19 unique, one- • No definitive pattern over time, with 2012-2014: 60% violations time offenders came from in four repeat violations fluctuating year over year. 10 operators: Big Play Sports, #1 Liquors, College Park Liquors, 9 9 • Between 2012 and 2014, four 9 and Cornerstone businesses that were repeat 8 7 offenders accounted for 60% of the 7 violations; recently the violations 6 5 have been spread across multiple 5

one-time offenders 4 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 28 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: Office of Student Conduct OFFICE OF STUDENT CONDUCT (UMD) OFF CAMPUS INCIDENTS

Off-Campus Non Academic Referrals

• Since the Office of Student 400 354 Conduct began reporting in 2013 350 the number of off-campus 300 incidents has jumped from 141 to 258 237, an increase of 68% 250 237 207 197 • PGPD has been the largest 200

contributor to enhanced 150 141 reporting; jumping from 33 in 2011 to 106 in 2019 100 50

0 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 29 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: Office of Student Conduct OFFICE OF STUDENT CONDUCT (UMD) RESPONSIBLE ACTION POLICY

Responsible Action Policy Calls • The Responsible Action Policy encourages students and community members to call for help 60 if someone is ill due to alcohol or 51 drugs 50 47

• 39 Despite dipping down in 2019, calls 40 through RAP more than doubled 34 32 29 between 2011 and 2018. 30 • This likely indicates a reduction in barriers to these sorts of calls more 20 16 15 than it indicates an increase of serious alcohol illnesses 10

0 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 30 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: Office of Student Conduct OFFICE OF STUDENT CONDUCT (UMD) RECENT REFERRAL SNAPSHOT

Off-campus student conduct referrals sharply increased in Fall 2017, rising from 190 to 355 in just one year. Generally, referrals are more frequent in fall months.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2019 Disciplinary Actions 100 197 off campus referrals 354off campus referrals 237 off campus referrals During this time OSC calculates the recidivism rate 90 to be < 8% 80 70 2017 2018 2019 60 Disciplinary Reprimand 33% 49% 48% 50 Disciplinary Probation 44% 38% 36% 40 Suspension Withheld 11% 6% 9% 30 Suspension 6% 3% 3% 20 Expulsion 10 1% 1% 1%

0 Other Sanctions 5% 3% 3%

Jun-16 Aug-16 Oct-16 Dec-16 Feb-17 Apr-17 Jun-17 Aug-17 Oct-17 Dec-17 Feb-18 Apr-18 Jun-18 Aug-18 Oct-18 Dec-18 Feb-19 Apr-19 Off Campus 31 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: UMD Office of Civil Rights & Sexual Misconduct, PGPD Joint Analysis Intelligence PROPERTY & PERSON CRIMES Center, Metro Police Data

Sexual Misconduct on Campus Prince George’s Police Department 800 673 Sexual misconduct reports and 600 249 reports complaints have risen in the 400 309 past 4 years, while 230 complaints 200 123 125 91 investigations have decreased. 54 78 29 13 14 29 19 3 9 In FY 2018, only 9 0 16 investigations investigations were completed Theft (FY 2018) . Assault Burglary Weapons Sex Offense Bicycle Theft REPORTS, COMPLAINTS, & INVESTIGATIONS FY 15-18 COMPLAINT OUTCOMES (FY 18) Motor Vehicle Theft 300 249 Complainant did not Complaintant did 250 208 want to move forward, Metro Police Department 184 not respond to 29 200 outreach, 3 50 47 150 112 80 91 100 66 No authority 40 48 Formal 27 over 50 26 16 investigation in 18 perpetrator, 30 0 progress, 7 16 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 20 Reports Complaints Investigations 12 Informal Not enough 9 9 resolution 10 4 Report: a potential complaint of sexual information 3 3 1 1 3 , 8 0 0 misconduct received by the Office of Civil provided, 14 0 Rights and Sexual Misconduct. Assaults Burglary & Sexual Theft Auto Theft Theft Complaint: when a student engages the Robbery Assault Bicycle Other University to address sexual misconduct 2011 2018 Investigation: open/pending and closed investigations 32 Source: Prince George’s County Police Department Crime University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Incidence, accessed through the Prince George’s County Open Data Portal; Montgomery County crime data COLLEGE PARK/UMD CRIME RATES accessed through MC Open Data Portal VS OTHER CITIES • Overall College Park is much safer than neighboring destination cities in the DC metro region; in some instances College Park is safer than Prince George’s and Montgomery Counties overall • Includes PGPD reported crimes and off-campus crimes reported by UMPD

Thefts Per 1,000 Residents (2019) Stolen Cars Per 1,000 Residents (2019) B&E Per 1,000 Residents (2019)

Rockvillle Prince George's Gaithersburg

Gaithersburg College Park Rockvillle

Takoma Park Gaithersburg Takoma Park

Bethesda Takoma Park Bethesda

Montgomery County Rockvillle Prince George's

College Park Bethesda College Park

Prince George's Montgomery County Montgomery County

-2 2 6 10 14 18 22 26 0 1 2 3 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Assaults Per 1,000 Residents (2019) Robberies Per 1,000 Residents (2019) Vandalism Per 1,000 Residents (2019)

Gaithersburg Takoma Park Rockvillle

Rockvillle Gaithersburg Takoma Park

Takoma Park Prince George's Gaithersburg

Montgomery County Rockvillle Bethesda

Bethesda College Park Montgomery County

Prince George's Montgomery County Prince George's

College Park Bethesda College Park 33 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Source: City of College Park; PGPD Crime University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Data PUBLIC SAFETY & HEALTH: PERCEPTIONS AND REALITIES Perceptions Reality

Evidence suggests most crime incidents are In the most recent Community Survey for decreasing faster than perceptions College Park (2019)… Decrease/Increase in Robberies (2017 to 2019)

Prince George’s

College Park

Chillium

of residents characterized their Beltsville 37% feeling of safety in College Park as Adelphi fair or poor -50% -25% 0% 25% 50%

Decrease/Increase in Assaults (2017 to 2019)

Prince George’s 41% felt the same in 2017 College Park Chillium

Beltsville Adelphi

-50.0% -25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 34 Source: City of College Park; PGPD Crime University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Data mapped in ArcGIS PUBLIC SAFETY & HEALTH: PERCEPTIONS AND REALITIES In the most recent Community Survey for College Park (2019) when asked where they felt safe, residents ranked parks and trails as the least safe. However, perceptions improved amongst most categories between 2017 and 2019.

Crimes within 200 Feet of a Trail While there was a higher number near trails in 2017, the number has continued to decrease alongside crime overall

2017 2018 2019 Violent Crimes within 200 Feet of a Trail* 8 2 2 % Overall in College Park 13.1% 5.1% 4.9% Theft within 200 Feet of a Trail 15 6 5 % Overall in College Park 9.5% 3.7% 3.4%

*Assaults, Robberies, Sex Crimes, and Homicides 35 Source: City of College Park University Community Vision 2030: Appendix UMD STUDENT PERCEPTIONS

In the most recent Community Survey for College Park (2019)…

University Non- Students Students % who feel safe overall in College Park (rating • of excellent or good) 43% 74% Students feel far less safe in College % who feel that crime is an extreme or moderate Park than non-student residents problem in their neighborhood 31% 13% • % who feel very safe or somewhat safe in… The geographies in which students feel Downtown College Park 61% 81% the least safe, as compared to non- In shopping centers 70% 79% students, are their neighborhoods, On College Park paths/trails 48% 66% downtown, on College Park trails, and Near College Park/UMD Metro 50% 68% at the UMD Metro Station Near Greenbelt Metro Station 55% 61%

*Assaults, Robberies, Sex Crimes, and Homicides 36 EDUCATION

37 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: American Community Survey: 2011 and 2018 CP CHILDREN BY ENROLLMENT

Estimated # of College Park Residents Enrolled by Grade This slide depicts an estimate of the number Public Private of children who LIVE in College Park, enrolled by school type, as of 2018 Pre-K (2018) 52% 48% +2.6% Enrollment change Pre-K (2011) 34% 66% (2011-2018) • Enrollment in elementary schools has increased by almost ~30% since 2011 Elementary School (2018) 76% 24% +29% • Enrollment in middle schools and Elementary School (2011) Enrollment change 74% 26% (2011-2018) high schools has declined by ~10% since 2011; the overall share of students attending public school Middle School (2018) 79% 21% -10.6% also shrank. Enrollment change Middle School (2011) 65% • Important to note that, due to the 35% (2011-2018) “time delayed nature” of Census data, these figures may not include High School (2018) 61% 39% the full impact of College Park -11.4% Enrollment change residents enrolled at College Park High School (2011) 73% 27% (2011-2018) Academy. 0 100 200 30038 400 500 600 700 800

38 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: American Community Survey, 2011 and 2018; UMD Employee Data DAY CARE AND PRE- K DEMAND

• The primary market for childcare services in College Park has increased by 16%, or Estimated Demand 2011 2018 ~740 ~860 approximately 160 people since 2011. Primary Market • Secondary Market has increased by ~7%, or Children <=5 in College Park ~740 ~860 ~6,560 ~7,020 approximately 460 children since 2011. Secondary Market Important to note that many of these children Children <=5 in Neighboring Areas* ~6,220 ~6,650 may also be served in neighboring child-care Children of “Proximate” UMD employees** ~340 ~370 facilities outside of College Park * Neighboring Areas: Berwyn, Beltsville, Adelphi, University Park, Hyattsville, Riverdale, Greenbelt

** Children of Proximate UMD Employees: Take the % of employees living within 10 miles, but outside of College Park and neighboring communities; multiply by the % of households that have children under the age of 6, according to Census Data

39 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: Maryland Child Care Resource Network Demographics Report 2020, 2014; supplemented by DAY CARE AND PRE- K SUPPLY surveys/interviews conducted by The Partnership

2014 2020 • By the end of 2020, capacity at College Park- Estimated Capacity (earliest available) based childcare services will have increased Capacity Facilities Capacity Facilities by almost 7%; capacity at child care centers Child Care in College Park 778 26 836 18 will increase by 20%, offsetting decline in in- Child Care Centers* 650 10 540 9 home care Opening in 2020 240 2 • Child care in College Park remains more In-Home Services 128 16 56 7 expensive than proximate communities; *Full Day Care Center in College Park: Service for children under 6, include day care centers and however, prices in neighboring preschools. In 2020:: Al Huda; Center for Young Children; NARA Easter Seals; Childway; Berwyn Christian; Apple Tree; College Park Nursery School; University Church Nursery; M&M Learning communities are quickly rising to “market Center. Opening later in 2020: Monarch Pre-School (120); Calvert Road School (120) prices,” and College Park remains far more affordable Montgomery County Costs: Comparing Mean Weekly Costs of Infant Care at CC Centers Maryland Family Network College Prince Park Hyattsville Greenbelt Riverdale George’s Montgomery Cost in 2019 $330 $306 $337 $320 $290 $416 Cost in 2014 $297 $216 $273 $225 $225 $233 % Change +11% +42% +23% 42% +29% +78% 40 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: MSDE report card data 2011;2019 PUBLIC SCHOOLS SERVING COLLEGE PARK

This slide depicts the current enrollment of SCHOOL 2011 2019 public schools that fully or partially enroll Enrollment Enrollment children living in College Park Berwyn Heights Elementary 461 473 Cherokee Lane Elementary 453 551 Hollywood Elementary 451 398 • Enrollment in local elementary schools Paint Branch Elementary 365 349 shrank at a time when enrollment for University Park Elementary 643 546 residents increased, indicating College Park Elementary School To t a l 2,373 2,317 children have proportionally higher representation at these schools than in 2011 Buck Lodge Middle 775 1,148 Greenbelt Middle 732 1,360 • Enrollment in local middle/high schools increased at a time when enrollment for Hyattsville Middle 663 927 residents decreased, indicating College College Park Academy N/A 659 Park children have proportionally lower Middle Schools Total 2,170 4,094 representation at these schools than in 2011 Eleanor Roosevelt High 2,669 2,649 High Point High 2,218 2,481 Northwestern High 2,097 2,315 Parkdale High 2,205 2,367 High Schools Total 9,189 9,812 41 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: Digitized from PDF maps of catchment areas CATCHMENT AREAS

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS HIGH SCHOOLS

High Point

Hollywood Buck Lodge Cherokee Lane Eleanor Roosevelt MARYLAND MARYLAND MARYLAND Greenbelt Paint Branch Berwyn Heights

Northwestern University Park Parkdale Hyattsville

COLLEGE PARK BOUNDARY COLLEGE PARK BOUNDARY COLLEGE PARK BOUNDARY

42 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix COLLEGE PARK ACADEMY

History Impacts • Founded in 2013 by City of College Park, the • In its first five years, CPA has earned some of the University of Maryland, CPCUP, and Prince George’s highest test scores in Maryland County Public Schools. • Over 72% of juniors participate in AP courses • Rigorous college preparatory curriculum; 7 foreign • In 2019, CPA had a graduation rate of >95%, languages; 13 AP courses; 25 UMD credit courses exceeding that of Montgomery County (86%) • Driven by partnerships with UMD (Departments of and Maryland overall (87%). Education, Public Health, Journalism, Music, etc.) • Innovative “Bricks and Clicks” model: CPA’s curriculum is fully online and 1/3 of courses are taught by online teachers

Enrollment and Matriculation • Student from across Prince George’s County may apply, but 35% set aside for College Park residents (for 6th graders, during lottery). As of 2018, College Park Academy enrolled ~186 students from the six local elementary school catchment areas (University Park, Riverdale, Paint Branch, Hollywood, Berwyn Heights, Cherokee Lane)

43 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: MSDE Free and Reduced-Price Meal Statistics FREE AND REDUCED LUNCHES AT COLLEGE PARK SERVING PUBLIC SCHOOLS

• Proportionally greater numbers of students qualify for free and reduced lunches at Free and Reduced Lunches College Park-serving schools than overall in Prince George’s County, Montgomery 2011 2019

County, and Maryland All CP-Serving Public Schools 61% (8,467) 66% (10,311) • College Park-serving public schools enrolled Select Elementary Schools 68% (1,652) 67% (1,566) more students who qualify for free and Select Middle Schools 74% (1,647) 74% (2,530) reduced lunches in 2019 than in 2011 Select High Schools 56% (5,168) 61% (5,989) • Proportionally this has increased at the same Prince George’s County (All Schools) 55% 60% level as Prince George’s County and Montgomery County (All Schools) 28% 34% Montgomery County overall; the Maryland (All Schools) 40% 43% proportional increase is slightly greater than Maryland overall

44 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: MSDE Free and Reduced-Price Meal Statistics FREE AND REDUCED LUNCHES

FREE AND REDUCED LUNCHES – 2011 VS. 2018 SCHOOL F&R LUNCHES: 2011 F&R LUNCHES: 2018 % CHANGE 2011-2018 Berwyn Heights Elementary 317 303 -4% Cherokee Lane Elementary 345 441 28% Hollywood Elementary 333 322 -3% Paint Branch Elementary 297 241 -19% University Park Elementary 360 259 -28% Buck Lodge Middle 735 985 34% College Park Academy (Not open yet) 226 -- Greenbelt Middle 427 872 104% Hyattsville Middle 485 673 39% Eleanor Roosevelt High 873 1,041 19% High Point High 1,382 1,912 38% Northwestern High 1,489 1,458 -2% Parkdale High 1,424 1,578 11% All College Park Schools 8,467 10,311 22% College Park Elementary Schools 1,652 1,566 -5% College Park Middle Schools 1,647 2,530 54% College Park High Schools 5,168 5,989 16% Prince George’s County (All Schools) 71,506 81,055 13% Montgomery County (All Schools) 47,415 55,202 16% Howard County (All Schools) 9,081 12,553 38% Maryland 358,373 387,535 8% 45 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: MSDE Free and Reduced-Price Meal Statistics FREE AND REDUCED LUNCHES

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL F&R LUNCHES

SCHOOL NAME 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Berwyn Heights Elementary 317 67% 338 70% 313 67% 346 70% 325 68% 341 70% 344 71% 303 65%

Cherokee Lane Elementary 345 81% 349 80% 393 83% 401 82% 392 76% 425 80% 452 81% 441 79%

Hollywood Elementary 333 72% 263 50% 284 69% 302 73% 275 69% 296 70% 307 72% 322 80%

Paint Branch Elementary 297 72% 301 81% 299 77% 304 81% 286 79% 264 73% 274 74% 241 62%

University Park Elementary 360 54% 353 56% 335 54% 320 56% 284 50% 285 51% 274 48% 259 47%

All Select Elementary Schools 1,652 68% 1,604 65% 1,624 69% 1,673 71% 1,562 67% 1,611 68% 1,651 68% 1,566 67%

% = students at each school receiving free and reduced lunch

46 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: MSDE Free and Reduced-Price Meal Statistics FREE AND REDUCED LUNCHES

MIDDLE SCHOOL F&R LUNCHES

SCHOOL NAME 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Buck Lodge Middle School 735 84% 739 87% 771 88% 986 90% 1,026 86% 1,055 85% 990 85% 985 86%

College Park Academy (Not open yet) 85 28% 127 34% 153 35% 197 36% 226 37%

Greenbelt Middle School 427 64% 601 61% 729 63% 779 66% 841 65% 850 66% 870 66% 872 64%

Hyattsville Middle School 485 71% 542 71% 614 78% 687 84% 655 78% 626 76% 650 75% 673 73%

All Select Middle Schools 1,647 74% 1,882 72% 2,114 75% 2,452 79% 2,522 76% 2,531 75% 2,510 75% 2,530 74%

% = students at each school receiving free and reduced lunch

47 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: MSDE Free and Reduced-Price Meal Statistics FREE AND REDUCED LUNCHES

HIGH SCHOOL F&R LUNCHES

SCHOOL NAME 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Eleanor Roosevelt High School 873 34% 913 37% 895 37% 1,042 42% 1,000 40% 981 39% 1,045 40% 1,041 40%

High Point High School 1,382 64% 1,551 72% 1,606 71% 1,834 76% 1,901 77% 2,064 79% 2,044 78% 1,912 76%

Northwestern High School 1,489 65% 1,435 65% 1,496 68% 1,582 70% 1,505 67% 1,543 66% 1,587 65% 1,458 63%

Parkdale High School 1,424 65% 1,401 67% 1,355 66% 1,509 70% 1,510 69% 1,550 67% 1,623 67% 1,578 67%

All Select High Schools 5,168 56% 5,300 59% 5,352 60% 5,967 64% 5,916 63% 6,138 63% 6,299 62% 5,989 61%

% = students at each school receiving free and reduced lunch

48 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Source: MSDE Testing Results 2009-2019 MSA and PARCC CHANGES IN TESTING

EXAMPLE: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ENGLISH AND LANGUAGE ARTS PROFICIENCY All schools saw scores drop with 100% 90% change from MSA to PARCC 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Prince George's County Howard County Montgomery County The State of Maryland updated the assessment mechanism from Maryland School Assessment (MSA) to the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) in 2015. This has since been replaced by Maryland Comprehensive Assessment Program (MCAP), which mirrors PARCC

• MSA was sensitive to foundational skills, which could be easily drilled; PARCC assessments focus more on vocabulary and strong cognitive processes • “Proficient” on the MSA is not necessarily equivalent of “Proficient” on PARCC assessments; a major drop is evident across every school in Maryland between 2014 and 2015 • Though instructive at testing cognition, PARCC may be more inaccessible to students with disabilities, students who lack fluency of English language, and students with socio-economic risk factors 49 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix ELEMENTARY: RELATIVE PROFICIENCY

RELATIVE PROFICIENCY INDIVIDUAL SCHOOLS

Math In 2011 In 2019 College Park Serving Public Schools were Math ELA more or less proficient than other geographies by… 2011 2019 2011 2019 Prince George’s +4% +5% Berwyn Heights Elementary 79.8% 28.4% 85.6% 41.9% Cherokee Lane Elementary 81.9% 13.0% 91.9% 25.2% Montgomery -6% -25% Hollywood Elementary 88.0% 25.5% 85.0% 26.6% Maryland -4% -13% Paint Branch Elementary 83.2% 33.0% 82.5% 35.2% University Park Elementary 80.4% 32.2% 92.2% 41.7% ELA CP-Serving Public ES 82.2% 26.7% 88.2% 34.4% In 2011 In 2019 Prince George’s County 78.2% 21.8% 81.9% 29.5% College Park Serving Public Schools were more or less proficient than other Montgomery County 88.7% 51.5% 91.8% 52.6% geographies by… Prince George’s +6% +5% Maryland 86.3% 39.5% 88.0% 42.9% Montgomery Source: MSDE MSA and PARCC Testing Scores 2011 and -4% -18% 2019; accessed through MSDE Report Card Maryland 0% -9%

50 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix ELEMENTARY: ELA TESTING 2015- 2019

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROFICIENCY: ELA Source: MSDE MSA and PARCC Testing Scores 2015 and 2019; accessed through MSDE Report Card

Berwyn Heights Cherokee Hollywood Paint Branch University Park Prince George’s Montgomery Maryland Increase in +23.9% +3.8% +2.9% +19.1% +4% +8.6% +7.2% +3.5% Proficiency

Montgomery 50%

Montgomery 45% Maryland

40% Maryland

35%

30% Prince George’s

25% Prince George’s 20%

15%

10%

5%

0% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Berwyn Heights Cherokee Lane Hollywood Paint Branch University Park 51 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix ELEMENTARY: MATH TESTING 2015- 2019

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROFICIENCY: MATH Source: MSDE MSA and PARCC Testing Scores 2015 and 2019; accessed through MSDE Report Card

Berwyn Heights Cherokee Hollywood Paint Branch University Park Prince George’s Montgomery Maryland Increase in +13.1% -2.4% +7.7% +19.5% +7.9% +6.3% +12.2% +7.2% Proficiency

Montgomery 50%

45%

40% Montgomery Maryland

35%

Maryland 30%

25% Prince George’s 20% Prince George’s 15%

10%

5%

0% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Berwyn Heights Cherokee Lane Hollywood Paint Branch University Park 52 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix MIDDLE SCHOOL: RELATIVE PROFICIENCY

RELATIVE PROFICIENCY INDIVIDUAL SCHOOLS

Math In 2011 In 2019 College Park Serving Public Schools were Math ELA more or less proficient than other geographies by… 2011 2019 2011 2019 Prince George’s -2% +2% Buck Lodge Middle School 56.6% 5.7% 71.8% 24.7% Greenbelt Middle School 58.4% 16.9% 72.6% 36.5% Montgomery -24% -17% Hyattsville Middle School 50.9% 14.3% 71.5% 34.7% Maryland -18% -10% College Park Academy 26.1% 55.6% CP Serving Public MS 55.3% 14.7% 71.9% 34.5%

ELA Prince George’s County 58.5% 12.1% 74.6% 32.9% In 2011 In 2019 Montgomery County 79.7% 32.0% 89.8% 54.2% College Park Serving Public Schools were more or less proficient than other Maryland geographies by… 73.7% 24.9% 83.5% 44.4% Prince George’s -3% +2% Source: MSDE MSA and PARCC Testing Scores 2011 and 2019; accessed through MSDE Report Card Montgomery -18% -20% Maryland -12% -10%

53 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix MS: ELA TESTING 2015- 2019

MIDDLE SCHOOL PROFICIENCY: ELA Source: MSDE MSA and PARCC Testing Scores 2015 and 2019; accessed through MSDE Report Card

College Park Bucks Lodge Greenbelt Hyattsville Prince George’s Montgomery Maryland Academy Increase in +3.3% +10.2% +.9% +9.1% +7.6% +8.7% +6% Proficiency

60%

Montgomery 50% Montgomery Maryland

40% Maryland

Prince George’s 30%

Prince George’s

20%

10%

0% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Bucks Lodge College Park Academy Greenbeltt Hyattsville 54 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix MS: MATH TESTING 2015- 2019

MIDDLE SCHOOL PROFICIENCY: MATH Source: MSDE MSA and PARCC Testing Scores 2015 and 2019; accessed through MSDE Report Card

College Park Bucks Lodge Greenbelt Hyattsville Prince George’s Montgomery Maryland Academy Increase in -3.2% -1.3% -2.1% +1.4% +0% +1.8% -.1% Proficiency

40%

35%

Montgomery 30% Montgomery

25% Maryland Maryland

20%

15%

Prince George’s Prince George’s 10%

5%

0% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Bucks Lodge College Park Academy Greenbeltt Hyattsville 55 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix HIGH SCHOOL: RELATIVE PROFICIENCY

RELATIVE PROFICIENCY INDIVIDUAL SCHOOLS

Algebra In 2011 In 2019 College Park Serving Public Schools were Algebra English more or less proficient than other geographies by… 2011 2019* 2011 2019* Prince George’s +4% -3% College Park Academy 26.8% 48.3% Eleanor Roosevelt High 87.1% 11.2% 90.7% 54.1% Montgomery -16% -27% High Point High 68.9% 4.0% 72.1% 25.6% Maryland -11% -21% Northwestern High 69.8% 3.3% 64.0% 11.7% Parkdale High 70.3% 4.9% 71.4% 24.5% English CP-Serving Public HS 72.2% 6.1% 74.5% 27.8% In 2011 In 2019 Prince George’s County 67.9% 9.7% 70.5% 25.2% College Park Serving Public Schools were more or less proficient than other Montgomery County 88.9% 33.5% 86.8% 52.7% geographies by… Prince George’s +4% +2% Maryland 83.6% 27.2% 81.7% 42.1% Montgomery Source: MSDE MSA and PARCC Testing Scores 2011 and -12% -24% 2019; accessed through MSDE Report Card Maryland -7% -13%

*see slide XX for explanation of change in assessment 56 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix HS: ELA TESTING 2015- 2019

HIGH SCHOOL PROFICIENCY: ELA Source: MSDE HSA and PARCC Testing Scores 2015 - 2019; accessed through MSDE Report Card

Eleanor College Park High Point Northwestern Park Dale Prince George’s Montgomery Maryland Roosevelt Academy Increase in -6.6% +5.3% +9% -5.2% -2.7% -3.6% +8.9% +2.4% Proficiency

70%

60%

Montgomery 50% Montgomery

Maryland 40% Maryland

30% Prince George’s Prince George’s

20%

10%

0% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Eleanor Roosevelt College Park Academy High Point Northwestern Parkdale 57 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix K- 12 SURVEY TAKEAWAYS

In the fall of 2017, on behalf of The College Park City-University Partnership, Social Studies Group (SSG) conducted a study involving parents of children age kindergarten- grade 12, living within and outside Prince George’s County. Parents who are UMD employees as well as College Park area parents who are not UMD employees were surveyed. These data represent findings from that survey

There is a significant drop expressed by Prince George’s County parents who send their children to middle school, suggesting a weakness in the transition from elementary to middle in the county. Non-Prince George’s County parents experience minimal drops during the transition and in some cases improvements in their top 10 Prince George’s County parents ranked important attributes. middle schools consistently low in all important factors, including all safety & well-being attributes ASSESSMENT: IMPORTANT ATTRIBUTES VS. WHAT PARENTS SEE AT THEIR LOCAL SCHOOLS

Rank of Top 10 Important Factors Elementary Middle High (For both Prince George’s County and non-Prince George’s County parents) PGCPS Non-PGCPS PGCPS Non-PGCPS PGCPS Non-PGCPS 1 Children feel safe 78% 87% 27% 77% 40% 78% 2 Safe school environment (safe from violence) 78% 87% 17% 71% 31% 68% 3 Safe school environment (safe from bullying) 62% 79% 15% 61% 34% 61% 4 Students have strong executive function and critical thinking skills 43% 72% 28% 67% 51% 75% 5 There is a culture of support, respect, and community for students 68% 85% 25% 75% 53% 75% 6 There is a culture of support, and respect for teachers 66% 83% 25% 78% 47% 78% Teachers work closely with families to meet student needs/make me 7 63% 76% 30% 65% 45% 65% aware of any issues affecting my child's academic performance 8 My student's teachers communicate well with me 65% 79% 41% 69% 58% 55% Students are prepared through hands-on learning and first-hand 9 45% 68% 27% 65% 67% 72% experiences 10 There are good student-to-teacher ratios 35% 64% 15% 63% 36% 62% 58 SUSTAINABILITY

59 Source: Sustainable Maryland; College Park’s 2019 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix Application COMMITTED GOVERNMENT

College Park recertified as a Sustainable Maryland City in October 2019 with a score of 385 points

12.68 Tons food At least 200 new How does College Park compare to neighboring waste diverted since towns composters sold April 2019 since 2017 Score Year College Park 385 2019 Takoma Park 685 2017 Greenbelt 600 2017 At least 204 new 70 kg CO2 Hyattsville 535 2019 reductions through Riverdale Park 310 2017 rain barrels* solar conversions Berwyn Heights 280 2017 University Park 235 2017 New Carrolton 185 2019 60 * Includes City-reported numbers and those tracked by The Partnership (CPCUP) University Community Vision 2030: Appendix COMMITTED UNIVERSITY

Emissions reduced 49% over last 10 years

~100% imported electricity is renewable

At least 81% waste diverted from landfills

~53% of generated and imported electricity is renewable

Increased sustainable sourcing by ~10%

Source: UMD Office of Sustainability Annual Progress Report 2018/2019 61 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix COMMITTED PLANNING/DEVELOPMENT

At least 25 buildings (newly College Park LEED Certified Buildings • Physical Sciences Complex • Terrapin Row constructed and rehabbed) • Knight Hall • Monument Village • South Campus Commons 7 • National Archives have been built to LEED • Oakland Hall • Domain • A. James Clark Hall • UMD Phase IX Sorority Bldg silver status or higher since • HJ Patterson Hall (Wing 1) 171 • Prince Frederick Hall • UMD Phase IX Sorority Bldg 2011 • Edward St. John Learning 176 and Teaching Center • Lot 4i UM Shuttle Facility • University House • Denton Dining Hall • Pocomoke Building Renovation • Chincoteague Hall • Royal Farms 057 10 15 • Wye Oak Building • Mazza Grandmarc Gold Silver • College Park Place Retail • U. of Maryland College of • Cambria Suites Hotel Journalism • Hotel at UMD

Source: US Green Business Council, UMD, Green Buildings Information Gateway 62 University Community Vision 2030: Appendix SUSTAINABILITY: THE TRANSPORTATION “THORN”

Automotive transportation continues to pose a major challenge to College Park becoming a fully sustainable city. More data available on slides 22 to 30

Some Positive Signs Growing Challenges

Working Local: More residents live and Convenience: More working adults work in College Park (11% vs. 9.6%) (25+) drove alone to work than in 2011 (68% vs. 60%); fewer walked/biked to Smart Growth: Greater % of housing work built in areas proximate to campus; Dispersion: 96% of College Park’s correlation with traffic count reductions workforce commutes from outside of College Park; ~50% from greater than Student Driven: Working adults under 10 miles away 25 were far more likely to walk/bike than drive to work; students Mode Shift: Transit ridership is down demonstrate appetite for non- regionally automotive modes 63