IN the COURT of the JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, COIMBATORE Presence :A.PRABU ,M.L., PGD IPL., JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-I JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V(FAC) COIMBATORE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, COIMBATORE Presence :A.PRABU ,M.L., PGD IPL., JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-I JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V(FAC) COIMBATORE. Wednesday, 2nd day of December 2020 C.M.P. No. 4170 Of 2020 CR.NO.1089 OF 2020 M. Prabu S/o.C.Manisamy .. Petitioner/ Accused / Vs/ Inspector of Police, B3 V.H.Road PS, Coimbatore Cr. No.1089 of 2020 ... Respondent/ Complainant CONDITION RELAXATION ORDER Condition Relaxation Application Filed on behalf of the petitioner by Advocate Thiru.S.Kumaresan, B.A.,B.L., and this application has been received through E-mail. Police submitted reply on 02-12-2020. After considering bail application, FIR and submission of counsel through email this court passed the following order. 2. From the materials available submitted through email it is seen that Accused is charged for the offences under Sections 5 r/w 7(3) TNLR ACT and he was arrested by the respondent/police and he was remanded to judicial custody on 24.10.2020. 3. Notice was sent through email to police. In the reply submitted by police on 2nd December, police stated that the petitioner was signed before the respondent police station on 06.11.2020 to 02.12.20 (Total 26 days). 4. In this petition the petitioner submits that the Petitioner/Accused is complying the condition from 06.11.20 regularly without fail. He is the sole breadwinner of this family. He could not able to attend his regular work therefore the petitioner's family is struggling for their day to day expenses and needs. He will not abscond or tamper with any of the witnesses. 5. On perusal of case records it is seen that the order has been passed directing to the petitioner sign before the respondent police at 10.00 a.m until further orders. On perusal of case records it is seen that accused has comply the condition from 06.11.2020 to 02.12.20 (26 days). Hence, on considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also considering the police reply, this court is inclined to grant modify the condition and the petitioner/accused should appear before respondent police and sign weekly once on every Monday at 10 a.m. for 4 weeks after sign the condition fully relaxed. In the result petition is ALLOWED. Dictated to the Steno-typist and typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me in open court on this the 2nd day of December 2020. /sd/A.Prabu JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, COIMBATORE (FAC) IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE No.VI, COIMBATORE. PRESENT : Thiru.K.R.Kannan, B.A.,B.L., Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Coimbatore. C.M.P.No. 4428/2020 in Cr. No. 1956/2020 Wednesday the 02nd day of December 2020 Saravanan, S/o.Bala .. Petitioner/Accused / VERSUS / Inspector of Police, D-1 Ramanathapuram (Crime) Ps., Cr.No: 1956/2020 U/s : 379 IPC .. Respondent/Complainant. ORDER The bail application in CMP.No.4428/2020 received by this court through e- mail. The respondent/police submitted their reply through e-mail on 02.12.2020. After carefully consideration of the bail application and the reply submitted by the respondent/police this court passed the following order, The petitioner is the accused in the above crime number. The Petitioner/accused was arrested and remanded to Judicial custody U/s. 379 IPC on 08.11.2020. For the past 25 days the petitioner is in Judicial custody. The case of the prosecution is when the defacto complainant traveled in a private bus on 08.01.2020 one person snatched a cash of Rs.7850/- in his packet. After investigation the respondent police has arrested this accused based upon his confession made in Cr.No.1957/2020. In the bail application in it was stated the accused was arrested and remanded to Judicial custody on 08.11.2020. In the bail application it was stated the petitioner was asked to present in the police station for preventing arrest at the time of Deepavali. Then the petitioner went to the police station and he was falsely arrested in two cases. In the bail application it was further stated the petitioner is an innocent person and he is no way connected in this case. The petitioner is in under Judicial custody for the past 23 days. In the bail application it was further stated the accused is a law abiding citizen and he will not abscond. In the petition it was further stated if the bail is granted the petitioner is ready to produce substantial sureties as per orders of this court. The petitioner counsel also submitted the written argument along with the bail application. In the reply the respondent/police has stated the Investigation is still pending. The petitioner also involved in E-3 Saravanampatti Police station in Cr.No.631/2013 and the case was disposed off. The petitioner is also involved in Cr.No.618/2018. If the bail is granted the petitioner will abscond and he will commit the same kind of offence. On this grounds the respondent police strongly opposed the bail application. On perusal of the records and as per the reply submitted by the respondent police the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.11.2020 for the alleged offence U/s.379 IPC. For the past 25 days the petitioner is in judicial custody. The petitioner was arrested in this case as per the confession statement in Cr.No.1957/2020. As per the reply the respondent police has stated the petitioner was involved in Cr.No.1957/2020 also. Further more the petitioner also involved in 2 other cases. Hence, in this circumstances considering the previous antecedents this court is not inclined to grant bail and the same is hereby dismissed. The order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on 02nd DECEMBER of 2020. Sd/-K.R.Kannan, Judicial Magistrate No. VI, Coimbatore. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE METTUPALAYAM Present: Thiru. M.Ramadhas, M.L., District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate(FAC), Mettupalayam Wednesday 02nd day of December 2020 C.M.P.No.1289/2020 in Cr.No 514/2020 (On the file of Inspector of Police, Sirumugai) 1) Mohamed Rafiq, S/o. Abdul Razzak. 2) Vasim Akram S/o. Mubarak Ali …..Petitioner/Accused No.A1 and A2. State through the -vs- Inspector of Police, Sirumugai Police station, Coimbatore District. …..Respondent/Complainant This bail application has been received through email. ORDER This petition is filed for bail for the alleged offence u/s.5 r/w 7(3) Lotteries Regulation Act. Since it is non bailable offence, notice was sent to police and reply was also received. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners/accused were alleged to have committed the offence u/s.5 r/w 7(3) Lotteries Regulation Act. In the reply, the police has stated that if the petitioners/accused are enlarged on bail they will not appear before this court at the time of trial and as such the prosecution has strongly opposed to release the accused on bail. The learned counsel for the petitioners/accused have stated in the petition that the petitioners / accused are no way connected with the offence, hence they may be enlarged on bail. It is seen from the records that the petitioners/accused were alleged to have committed the offence u/s.5 r/w 7(3) Lotteries Regulation Act. They were remanded to Judicial Custody on 27.11.2020. The accused have been inside the Jail for the past 6 days. Considering the period of incarceration, Considering the fact and circumstances of this case, Considering the COVID-19 pandemic situation, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly this petitioners are hereby ordered to be released on bail on the executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with 2 sureties to the like sum each and further condition that they shall appear and sign before the Respondent P.S daily once at 10.00 A.M. until further orders. /sd/M. Ramadhas.M.L.,(02.12.2020) District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate(FAC), Mettupalayam. IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, COIMBATORE Presence :A.PRABU ,M.L., PGD IPL., JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-I Wednesday, 2nd day of December 2020 C.M.P. No. (urgent ) 4438 Of 2020 CR.NO.1268 OF 2020 Rahim(Abdul rahim)(19) S/o.Mohammed kani Vs .. Petitioner/ Accused Inspector of Police, R.S.Puram p.s, coimbatore Cr. No.1268 of 2020 ... Respondent/ Complainant ORDER Bail Application Filed U/s. 437 OF Cr.P.C on behalf of the petitioner by Advocate Thiru Zackriya and this application has been received through E-mail. Police submitted reply on 02.12.2020. After considering bail application, FIR and submission of counsel through email this court passed the following order. 2. From the materials available submitted through email it is seen that Accused is charged for the offences under Sections 379 IPC and he was arrested by the respondent/police and he was remanded to judicial custody on 30.10.2020. 3. The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the Petitioner Submits that the truth of the fact is that he is a road side merchant and the other accused namely soorya is known to him as a neighbour. On 29.10.2020 the said soorya came to the petitioners house in a two wheeler R.No.TN 39 AC 4360 and left the vehicle stating that iw was his friends vehicle and later took the vehicle and went away.