Acquisition Opportunity: Profitable English Football League Two ("EFL Two") Club with Loyal Fan Base

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Acquisition Opportunity: Profitable English Football League Two ( Acquisition Opportunity: Profitable English Football League Two ("EFL Two") Club with Loyal Fan Base "The Company” is an English Football League Two club with loyal fan base near London in the United Kingdom. The EFL has a proud history and was formed over 115 years ago. The purchase includes all tangible and intangible assets associated with the club. The club currently leases its home stadium and operates several food services outlets including walk-up counters, bars and restaurants. The club’s home stadium boasts a seating capacity of over 6,000. Additionally, the purchase includes a variety maintenance equipment and all player contracts.. Key Acquisition Considerations Highlights Business Description $11.770M English Football League (EFL) was formed in 1888 by its twelve founder members and is the 2020 Revenue world's original league football competition. The EFL is the template used by leagues the world over. The EFL is the largest single body of professional Clubs in European football $.706M and is responsible for administering and regulating the EFL, the Carabao Cup and the Papa John’s Trophy, as well as reserve and youth football. The EFL's 72 member clubs are 2020 Cashflow grouped into three divisions: the EFL Championship, EFL League One, and EFL League Two 6.0% League Two Cashflow Margin There are 24 clubs in the EFL League Two. Each season, clubs play each of the other teams twice (once at home, once away). Clubs are awarded three points for a win, one for a draw 115yrs and no points for a loss. Over the season, these points are tallied, and a league table is Time since Inception constructed. At the end of each season the top three teams, together with the winner of the play-offs between the teams which finished in the fourth to seventh positions, are Included with promoted to EFL League One and are replaced by the four teams that finished at the Purchase bottom of that division. Similarly, the two teams that finished at the bottom of League Two are relegated to the National League and are replaced by the team that finished first and • Food Service the team that won the second through seventh place play-off in that division. Final league • Equipment position is determined, in order, by points obtained, goal difference, goals scored, a mini- • Stadium Lease league of the results between two or more teams ranked using the previous three criteria, Player Contracts and finally a series of one or more play-off matches. There is a mandatory wage cap in this • division that limits spending on players' wages. • Dining Locations Team & Financial Data Investment Considerations: In order to maintain the highest level of confidentiality, the seller • Reliable Revenue Growth has requested that LINK secures a • Associated with the $34B European signed Non-disclosure Agreement Football Market and Proof-of-Funds from all • Consistently Top Performing Team prospective buyers prior to furnishing more specific • Turn-Key Business information regarding the Club and its financial data. Link Business has been engaged as the exclusive US advisor in a sale of the Company. Questions relating to the information contained in this Information Summary and requests for additional information should be directed to: Geoffrey Warrell - President & CEO LINK Business – Fort Worth Direct: 610-716-1426 [email protected] STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.
Recommended publications
  • Theory of the Beautiful Game: the Unification of European Football
    Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 54, No. 3, July 2007 r 2007 The Author Journal compilation r 2007 Scottish Economic Society. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main St, Malden, MA, 02148, USA THEORY OF THE BEAUTIFUL GAME: THE UNIFICATION OF EUROPEAN FOOTBALL John Vroomann Abstract European football is in a spiral of intra-league and inter-league polarization of talent and wealth. The invariance proposition is revisited with adaptations for win- maximizing sportsman owners facing an uncertain Champions League prize. Sportsman and champion effects have driven European football clubs to the edge of insolvency and polarized competition throughout Europe. Revenue revolutions and financial crises of the Big Five leagues are examined and estimates of competitive balance are compared. The European Super League completes the open-market solution after Bosman. A 30-team Super League is proposed based on the National Football League. In football everything is complicated by the presence of the opposite team. FSartre I Introduction The beauty of the world’s game of football lies in the dynamic balance of symbiotic competition. Since the English Premier League (EPL) broke away from the Football League in 1992, the EPL has effectively lost its competitive balance. The rebellion of the EPL coincided with a deeper media revolution as digital and pay-per-view technologies were delivered by satellite platform into the commercial television vacuum created by public television monopolies throughout Europe. EPL broadcast revenues have exploded 40-fold from h22 million in 1992 to h862 million in 2005 (33% CAGR).
    [Show full text]
  • Football Tables 2019-20 Prt.Xlsx
    English Premier League PosTeam PldWDL GF GA GD Pts Qualification or relegation [ 1 Liverpool (C) 38 32 3 3 85 33 52 99 2 Manchester City[a] 38 26 3 9 102 35 67 81 Qualification for the Champions 3 Manchester United 38 18 12 8 66 36 30 66 League group stage 4 Chelsea 38 20 6 12 69 54 15 66 Qualification for the Europa 5 Leicester City 38 18 8 12 67 41 26 62 League group stage Qualification for the Europa 6 Tottenham Hotspur 38 16 11 11 61 47 14 59 League second qualifying round[b] 7 Wolverhampton Wanderers 38 15 14 9 51 40 11 59 Qualification for the Europa 8 Arsenal 38 14 14 10 56 48 8 56 League group stage[c] 9 Sheffield United 38 14 12 12 39 39 0 54 10 Burnley 38 15 9 14 43 50 −7 54 11 Southampton 38 15 7 16 51 60 −9 52 12 Everton 38 13 10 15 44 56 −12 49 13 Newcastle United 38 11 11 16 38 58 −20 44 14 Crystal Palace 38 11 10 17 31 50 −19 43 15 Brighton & Hove Albion 38 9 14 15 39 54 −15 41 16 West Ham United 38 10 9 19 49 62 −13 39 17 Aston Villa 38 9 8 21 41 67 −26 35 18 Bournemouth (R) 38 9 7 22 40 65 −25 34 Relegation to the EFL 19 Watford (R) 38 8 10 20 36 64 −28 34 Championship 20 Norwich City (R) 38 5 6 27 26 75 −49 21 English Championship Promotion, qualification or PosTeam PldWDL GF GA GD Pts relegation 1 Leeds United (C, P) 46 28 9 9 77 35 42 93 Promotion to the Premier League 2 West Bromwich Albion (P) 46 22 17 7 77 45 32 83 3 Brentford 46 24 9 13 80 38 42 81 4 Fulham (O, P) 46 23 12 11 64 48 16 81 Qualification for Championship 5 Cardiff City 46 19 16 11 68 58 10 73 play-offs[a] 6 Swansea City 46 18 16 12 62 53 9 70 7 Nottingham
    [Show full text]
  • Too Big to Fail? Accounting for Predictions of Financial Distress In
    Too big to fail? Accounting for Predictions of Financial Distress in English Professional Football Clubs PLUMLEY, Daniel <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7875-0969>, SERBERA, Jean- Philippe and WILSON, rob Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/27518/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version PLUMLEY, Daniel, SERBERA, Jean-Philippe and WILSON, rob (2020). Too big to fail? Accounting for Predictions of Financial Distress in English Professional Football Clubs. Journal of Applied Accounting Research. Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk Too big to fail? Accounting for Predictions of Financial Distress in English Professional Football Clubs Abstract Purpose This paper analyses English Premier League (EPL) and English Football League (EFL) Championship clubs during the period 2002-2019 to anticipate financial distress with specific reference to footballs’ Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations. Design/Methodology/Approach Data was collected for 43 professional football clubs competing in the EPL and Championship for the financial year ends 2002-2019. Analysis was conducted using the Z-score methodology and additional statistical tests were conducted to measure differences between groups. Data was split into two distinct periods to analyse club finances pre and post-FFP. Findings The results show significant cases of financial distress amongst clubs in both divisions and that Championship clubs are in significantly poorer financial health than EPL clubs. In some cases, financially sustainability has worsened post-FFP.
    [Show full text]
  • A Model of Promotion and Relegation in League Sports
    A Model of Promotion and Relegation in League Sports John Jasina Claflin University School of Business Kurt Rotthoff Seton Hall University Stillman School of Business Last working version, final version published in: Journal of Economics and Finance Volume 36, Issue 2, April, Pages 303-318 The final publication is available at www.springerlink.com: http://www.springerlink.com/content/f6862826t6w54663/?p=7684fbc045744b4ba122f29165ab4 eff&pi=26 Abstract Sports leagues in different parts of the world are set up in different ways, some as open leagues and some as closed leagues. It has been shown that spending on players is higher in open leagues (Szymanski and Ross 2000 and Szymanski and Valletti 2005). This paper extends these studies, finding that sports leagues that practice promotion and relegation will have unambiguously higher aggregate spending on player talent than closed leagues. This will lower profits in the open league, but increase fan welfare. John Jasina is can be contacted at: [email protected], Claflin University, 400 Magnolia St., Orangeburg, SC 29115 and Kurt Rotthoff at: [email protected], Seton Hall University, JH 621, 400 South Orange Ave, South Orange, NJ 07079. We would like to thank Skip Sauer, Mike Maloney, Curtis Simon, and Hillary Morgan for helpful comments. Any mistakes are ours. 1 1. Introduction Most North American sports leagues are closed leagues that operate with a fixed set of teams every season. This differs from other leagues throughout the world that have open leagues that practice promotion, or a team from a lower division being promoted to a higher league, and relegation, where the lowest teams of a given division are demoted to a lower division.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Mind Footy Quiz Questions
    The Big Mind Footy Quiz As part of Mind’s partnership with The English Football League Questions 1 How many clubs make up the three EFL Divisions (The EFL Championship; EFL League One and EFL League Two)? 2 Can you name the two EFL knockout cup competitions? 3 What season was the EFL Cup (The Football League Cup as it was previously known) introduced? 4 And which club won the first EFL Cup? 5 There are five EFL clubs with ‘Rovers’ in their name, can you name them? (A point for each correct Team) 6 Can you name the team who finished the 2005-06 season as The EFL Championship winners with a record points total? (Bonus point for the points total) 7 Who were the first team to win the Football League Title (1888/89 Season) 8 Can you name the three Welsh clubs who play in the EFL? 9 Can you name the two EFL clubs who are based in Cumbria? 10 Who used to play their home games at Highfield Road? 11 Which EFL club are known as The Tractor Boys? The Big Mind Footy Quiz As part of Mind’s partnership with The English Football League Answers 1 72 2 The EFL Cup (currently known as The Carabao Cup) and The EFL Trophy (currently known as The Papa Johns Trophy) 3 1960/61 4 Aston Villa 5 Blackburn Rovers; Bristol Rovers; Doncaster Rovers; Forest Green Rovers; Tranmere Rovers 6 Reading. (Bonus point: 106 points) 7 Preston North End 8 Cardiff, Swansea and Newport County 9 Barrow AFC and Carlisle United 10 Coventry City 11 Ipswich Town .
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster City Fc
    LANCASTER CITY FC Giant Axe, West Road, Lancaster Lancashire LA1 5PE Telephone & Fax: 01524 382238 Email: [email protected] Website: www.lancastercityfc.com Welcome . WWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWELCOME Good afternoon and welcome to our Northern Premier League game against league leaders Warrington Town. We would like to extend a warm welcome to their players, officials and supporters along with the match officials and hope they enjoy their visit. It is the best part of a month since we shared the points with Morpeth in our last home game and a lot has happened since then. The disappointing FA Cup exit at Skelmersdale was followed by the frustration of our home game against Gainsborough having to be postponed the day before as a precaution following Covid concerns around the visitors. The pandemic continues to have a big impact on our league at the moment with three clubs currently not being able to play for a short period of time. I am sure all other clubs send them their best wishes whilst hoping it is a situation they can avoid themselves. However, the season has taken a turn for the better in the last week with our first win of the season coming in con- vincing fashion at Grantham last Saturday which was then followed up by a hard earned point at FC United in mid- week. Warrington have made another excellent start to the season and arrive at Giant Axe with a three point lead at the top of the table having won five and lost one of their seven games to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedural Rules
    SR/Adhocsport/253/2019 IN THE MATTER OF AN EFL DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION Before: Charles Flint QC BETWEEN: - THE ENGLISH FOOTBALL LEAGUE (the EFL) Claimant -and- BIRMINGHAM CITY FOOTBALL CLUB (the Club) Respondent DECISION James Segan, instructed by Solesbury Gay and Nick Craig (Governance and Legal Director) for the EFL Kendrah Potts and William Harman instructed by Ciara Gallagher (Club Secretary) for the Club 1. By a decision dated 22 March 2019 a Disciplinary Commission, which I chaired, imposed a deduction of 9 points on the Club for its admitted breaches of Rule 2.9 of the Profitability and Sustainability Rules (the P&S Rules) by incurring adjusted losses totalling £48.79 million over a monitoring period comprising the seasons 2015/16, 2016/17 and 2017/18. Those losses exceeded the permitted upper loss threshold by £9.79 million. - 1 - 2. By a letter dated 14 May 2019 the EFL gave notice to the Club of the reference to a Disciplinary Commission of proceedings arising out of the Club’s failure to comply with a direction made when the EFL imposed a business plan on the Club by letter dated 1 August 2018, as amended. 3. The proceedings are brought under the EFL Regulations (the Regulations) and the P&S Rules. Regulation 1.1 provides that misconduct includes a breach of a requirement or direction of the EFL. P&S Rule 2.9 provides that if a club’s earnings result in a loss that exceeds a stipulated threshold, the executive of the EFL may exercise the powers set out in Regulation 16.20.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emirates Fa Cup Season 2021-22 List of Exemptions
    THE EMIRATES FA CUP SEASON 2021-22 LIST OF EXEMPTIONS 44 CLUBS EXEMPT TO THIRD ROUND PROPER (PL & EFL Championship) AFC Bournemouth Derby County FC Nottingham Forest FC Arsenal FC Everton FC Peterborough United FC Aston Villa FC Fulham FC Preston North End FC Barnsley FC Huddersfield Town FC Queens Park Rangers FC Birmingham City FC Hull City Reading FC Blackburn Rovers FC Leeds United AFC Sheffield United FC Blackpool FC Leicester City FC Southampton FC Brentford FC Liverpool FC Stoke City FC Brighton & Hove Albion FC Luton Town FC Swansea City FC Bristol City FC Manchester City FC Tottenham Hotspur FC Burnley FC Manchester United FC Watford FC Cardiff City FC Middlesbrough FC West Bromwich Albion FC Chelsea FC Millwall FC West Ham United FC Coventry City FC Newcastle United FC Wolverhampton Wanderers FC Crystal Palace FC Norwich City FC 48 CLUBS EXEMPT TO FIRST ROUND PROPER (EFL League One & League Two) Accrington Stanley FC Fleetwood Town FC Port Vale FC AFC Wimbledon Forest Green Rovers FC Portsmouth FC Barrow AFC Gillingham FC Rochdale AFC Bolton Wanderers FC Harrogate Town FC Rotherham United FC Bradford City FC Hartlepool United FC Salford City FC Bristol Rovers FC Ipswich Town FC Scunthorpe United FC Burton Albion FC Leyton Orient FC Sheffield Wednesday FC Cambridge United FC Lincoln City FC Shrewsbury Town FC Carlisle United AFC Mansfield Town FC Stevenage FC Charlton Athletic FC Milton Keynes Dons FC Sunderland AFC Cheltenham Town FC Morecambe FC Sutton United FC Colchester United FC Newport County AFC Swindon Town FC Crawley
    [Show full text]
  • Gate-Sharing and Talent Distribution in the English Football League
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Robinson, Terry; Simmons, Robert Working Paper Gate-sharing and talent distribution in the English football league Manchester Business School Working Paper, No. 570 Provided in Cooperation with: Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester Suggested Citation: Robinson, Terry; Simmons, Robert (2009) : Gate-sharing and talent distribution in the English football league, Manchester Business School Working Paper, No. 570, The University of Manchester, Manchester Business School, Manchester This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50692 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Working Paper Series Gate Sharing and Talent Distribution in the English Football League Robert Simmons Terry Robinson Manchester Business School Working Paper No 570 Manchester Business School Copyright © 2009, Robinson.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Season Game Notes
    2021 SEASON GAME NOTES HOME PLAYER2021 SCHEDULE INFO DATE OPPONENT TIME RESULT 05/01 vs. New Mexico United 7:30PM CST W, 1-0 05/06 vs. San Diego Loyal 7:00PM CST W, 1-0 05/16 vs. San Antonio FC 7:30PM CST W, 2-1 05/22 @ El Paso Locomotive FC 8:30PM CST L, 1-0 05/29 @ San Antonio FC 7:30PM CST D, 1-1 06/06 @ Miami FC 5:30PM CST W, 4-2 06/12 vs. Real Monarchs SLC 7:00PM CST - 06/16 vs. Austin Bold FC 7:00PM CST - 4-1-1 06/19 @ San Antonio FC 7:30PM CST - 06/25 vs. Tulsa FC 7:30PM CST - AWAY 06/30 vs. El Paso Locomotive FC 7:00PM CST - 07/10 @ Austin Bold FC 8:00PM CST - 07/17 @ Orange County SC 7:00PM CST - 07/24 vs. Austin Bold FC 8:00PM CST - 07/31 @ Phoenix Rising FC 9:30PM CST - 08/04 @ Real Monarchs SLC 9:00PM CST - 08/08 vs. San Antonio FC 7:30PM CST - 08/14 vs. Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC 7:00PM CST - 08/17 @ Austin Bold FC 8:00PM CST - 08/21 @ El Paso Locomotive FC 8:30PM CST - 08/29 @ OKC Energy FC 5:00PM CST - 1-3-2 09/04 vs. Loudoun United 7:00PM CST - 09/11 @ Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC 8:00PM CST - MATCH INFO 09/18 vs. Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC 7:00PM CST - Saturday, June 12 09/22 @ New Mexico United 8:00PM CST - H-E-B Park 09/25 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Football Association Challenge the Cup Final
    The Football Association Challenge The Cup Final Cup Final Facts • The match is widely known as just the Cup Final. • It is the last match in the Football Association (FA) Challenge Cup. • It has about 86 000 spectators and millions of TV viewers. • The trophy (winner’s cup) is only on loan to the winning side. • It is the oldest cup competition in the world, first played in the 1871 - 72 season. Who Can Enter? The Challenge Cup competition is open to any club in the top ten levels of the English Football League. Once clubs have registered to play, the tournament is organised into 12 randomly drawn rounds, followed by the semi-finals and finals. The higher ranked teams join the competition in later rounds when some of the lower ranked teams have been knocked out. What Do the Winners Receive? The winners of the final match receive the Football Association Cup, the FA Cup. It comes in three parts; the base, the cup and a lid. Over the years, there have been two designs of trophy and five cups have been made. The first cup, known as the ‘little tin idol’, was stolen in 1895 and never returned. An exact replica was made and used until 1910. From 1911, a new design was made. In 1992, another copy was made as the cup was wearing out from being handled, and another replacement was made in 2014. The cup is presented at the end of the match, giving the engraver just five minutes to engrave the winning team on the silver band on the base.
    [Show full text]
  • The FA Disciplinary Regulations 2019/2020
    TTHHEE FFAA DDIISSCCIIPPLLIINNAARRYY RREEGGUULLAATTIIOONNSS 2019/2020 Version: 1.0 CONTENTS PREFACE REGULATION CHANGES – NOTE TO PARTICIPANTS PARTS GENERAL PROVISIONS NON-FAST TRACK REGULATIONS APPEALS - NON-FAST TRACK ON-FIELD REGULATIONS FAST TRACK REGULATIONS INTERIM SUSPENSION ORDER REGULATIONS APPENDICES REGULATION CHANGES – NOTE TO PARTICIPANTS Participants should be aware that any of The Association’s Regulations may be amended during the season following publication of The FA Handbook. Reference should be made to The FA’s website, located at www.TheFA.com, for updated versions of the Regulations. GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION ONE: ALL PANELS SECTION TWO: REGULATORY COMMISSIONS GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 These General Provisions are split into two parts: 1.1 The provisions in Section One shall apply to Inquiries, Commissions of Inquiry, Regulatory Commissions, Disciplinary Commissions, Appeal Boards and Safeguarding Review Panels. 1.2 The provisions in Section Two shall apply to Regulatory Commissions and, where stated in paragraph 27, Disciplinary Commissions. SECTION ONE: ALL PANELS SCOPE 2 This Section One shall apply to Inquiries, Commissions of Inquiry, Regulatory Commissions, Disciplinary Commissions, Appeal Boards and Safeguarding Review Panels. 3 In relation to proceedings before a Disciplinary Commission, references in this Section One to The Association shall be taken to mean the relevant Affiliated Association. GENERAL 4 The bodies subject to these General Provisions are not courts of law and are disciplinary, rather than arbitral, bodies. In the interests of achieving a just and fair result, procedural and technical considerations must take second place to the paramount object of being just and fair to all parties. 5 All parties involved in proceedings subject to these General Provisions shall act in a spirit of co-operation to ensure such proceedings are conducted expeditiously, fairly and appropriately, having regard to their sporting context.
    [Show full text]