Georgetown University Law School, Washington, D. C., May, No
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
GEORGETOWN LAW STUDENTS His Several Publications
o ecu VCut VOL. 4, No. 2 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL. WASHINGTON. I). ('. JANUARY 1952 STUDENTS ELECTED TO KRONSTEIN HONORED BY HOUSE OF DELEGATES UNIV. OF FRANKFURT Georgetown Reaches Final Round SBA Organization Doctor Heinrich Kronstein has been Now Completed honored with the distinction of an In National M oot Court Competion Swinging into action shortly after Honorarprofessor appointment to the the election of class representatives Faculty of Law of the University of and the nomination of delegates from Frankfurt. The fields included under D. C. Cup Retained By School the law clubs, the House of Delegates his appointment are Trade Regula of the Student Bar Association con tion and Comparative Law. By virtue As Result of District Victory vened and set into motion several com of his position as an honorary pro mittees which will function through fessor, he may teach these subjects, if bj/ Richard J. Zanurd% A. \ . 52 out the year to provide activities of he so chooses, at the famous German an intellectual, social, and recreational university. He also enjoys all the rights of a full professor of the uni On Friday night, December 14, Georgetown's Moot Court team entered nature for students here at George the final round of the Second Annual National Competition. The adversaries town Law School. versity, such as participation in faculty meetings and decisions. represented the University of Arizona. 1 he bench consisted oi the following: As provided for by the SBA Con Doctor Curt Staff, President of the Mr. Justice Harold H. Burton, Supreme Court of the United States; Judge stitution, ratified early in the school John J. -
The Department of Justice and the Limits of the New Deal State, 1933-1945
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND THE LIMITS OF THE NEW DEAL STATE, 1933-1945 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Maria Ponomarenko December 2010 © 2011 by Maria Ponomarenko. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/ms252by4094 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. David Kennedy, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Richard White, Co-Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Mariano-Florentino Cuellar Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii Acknowledgements My principal thanks go to my adviser, David M. -
The Impact of the Nazi Racial Decrees on the University of Heidelberg Arye Carmon
The Impact of the Nazi Racial Decrees on the University of Heidelberg Arye Carmon One of the first objectives realized by the Nazis during the years 1933-1935 was the "cleansing" (Saeuberung) of the German universities of their Jewish students and lecturers. This purge was connected with the attempt to "co- ordinate" (Gleichschaltung) German academic life with the tenets of National Socialism. Yet, while "co-ordination" and "cleansing" seem to us in retrospect to be interrelated processes, the Nazis considered them as two separate issues. The former was a long-range objective, which was never fully realized, while the ousting of Jewish academics was in fact one aspect of the Nazi "solution of the Jewish question." The following is an attempt to describe the "cleansing" process and to analyze its implications1. Although the research presented here is a case study of a single university - Heidelberg* - it also constitutes all attempt to 1 For a description of the expulsion of Jewish academics from the Berlin- Charlottenburg T.H. see Hans Ebert, “The Expulsion of the Jews from the Berlin-Charlottenburg Technische Hochschule,” Leo Baeck Institute Year Book , Vol. XIX, 1974, pp. 155–171. *The University of Heidelberg, established in 1386 by the Elector Palatine of the Rhine, Ruprecht I, for several centuries played a significant role in the spiritual life of Central Europe. In May 1803, during the Napoleonic wars, Karl Friedrich, Markgraf of Baden, issued an edict for the re-organisation of the university. This edict effected a departure from the medieval tradition of studium generale , according to which education had been regarded primarily as a tool of the state. -
National Security and Judicial Ethics: the Exception to the Rule of Keeping Judicial Conduct Judicial and the Politicization of the Judiciary
KASTENBERGRTP.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 5/10/20 8:28 AM NATIONAL SECURITY AND JUDICIAL ETHICS: THE EXCEPTION TO THE RULE OF KEEPING JUDICIAL CONDUCT JUDICIAL AND THE POLITICIZATION OF THE JUDICIARY JOSHUA KASTENBERG I. DISQUALIFICATION AND THE MISTRETTA RULE ....................................................... 288 A. JUDICIAL RECUSAL RULES IN THE MODERN ERA ....................................................................... 291 B. JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS ............................................................................................................................................ 293 II. JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES, ADVICE, AND ENCOURAGEMENT: TAFT, STONE, AND BURGER ..................................................................................................................................................... 298 A. TAFT AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY EXCEPTION .................................................................... 302 B. STONE: OPPOSITION TO EXTRA-JUDICIAL CONDUCT BUT RESISTANCE TO HIS EXAMPLE ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 305 C. WARREN BURGER AND THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF NIXON .............................................. 309 D. THE CANADIAN AND AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE AND ANSWER ................................... 312 III. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................................................ -
October Term, 1953
: : I JU«^k> £j£ OCTOBER TERM, 1953 STATISTICS Miscella- Original Appellate Total neous Number of cases on dockets 11 815 637 1, 463 Cases disposed of__ 0 694 609 1,303 Remaining on dockets __ 11 121 28 160 Cases disposed of—Appellate Docket By written opinions 84 By per curiam opinions 86 By motion to dismiss or per stipulation (merit cases) 2 By denial or dismissal of petitions for certiorari 522 Cases disposed of—Miscellaneous Docket By written opinion 0 By per curiam opinion 0 By denial or dismissal of petitions for certiorari 507 By denial or withdrawal of other applications 92 By transfer to Appellate Docket 10 Number of written opinions 65 Number of printed per curiam opinions 11 Number of petitions for certiorari granted 88 Number of appeals in which jurisdiction was noted or post- poned 31 Number of admissions to bar (133 admitted April 26) 1, 557 REFERENCE INDEX Page Court convened October 5. (President Eisenhower attended.) Vinson, C. J., death of (Sept. 8, 1953) announced- 1 Warren, C. J., commission (recess appointment) read and oath taken (Oct. permanent 5, 1953) ; commission recorded and oath taken March 20, 1954, filed 1, 181 Statement by Chief Justice as to his nonparticipation in mat- ters considered at first conference 6 Reed, J., temporarily assigned to Second Circuit 204 Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General, presented 2 269533—54 71 : n Pag* Simon E. Sobeloff, Solicitor General, presented 150 Allotment of Justices 28 Attorney Change of name 147 Withdrawal of membership (Roscoe B. Stephenson) 235 Counsel appointed (121) 4 Special Master—pleadings referred to. -
Some Axioms for Probation Officers J 0 (J, B I-' W (News of the Future: the Intensive F( (February 1940)
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. • Special Anniversary Issue CELEBRATING 50 YEARS IN PRINT 1937·1987 The Establishment and Early Years of the Federal . :. • I :. \ Probation System ................................... ~ .................... Sanford Bates Latter-Day Procedures in the Sentencing and Treatment of Offenders in the Federal Courts . Henry P. Chandler oms for Probation Officers .................................... Joseph P. Murphy Lal Workers: Counseling Con Men? ................................ JO}ln Stratton I the Life of a Federal Probation Officer ........................... , William C. Nau -." a and Probation. .. ............................. R. Margaret Cork l Objectives in Probatio 106685-106692 U.S. Department of Justice h to Staff Accountabili1 National Institute of Justice ThiS document has been reproduced exactly as received from the 1 Call It Control-And person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in thiS document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the offiCial position or flolicies of the National Institute of and Felony Offenders. Justice PermissIOn to reproduce this cOPYrighted material has been Le Future: The Intensi granted by I .. F~~"=-~~E()~at~c?I1_--,ql.:l~!~~ly ____ _ to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) Further reproductJon outside of the NCJRS system requires permis sion of the copyright owner JUNE 1987 • lo(P~85 • A J 0 URN A L OF COR R E C T ION ALP H I LOS 0 P H Y AND P R P 'J TIC E Published by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts • VOLUME LI JUNE 1987 NUMBER 2 This Issue in Brief HIS SPECIAL ISSUE contains 10 out authored. -
Christian Kirchner Als Gesellschaftsrechtler Christine Windbichler, 21.3.2014, Gedächtnisveranstaltung Und Symposion Zur Feschriftübergabe
Christian Kirchner als Gesellschaftsrechtler Christine Windbichler, 21.3.2014, Gedächtnisveranstaltung und Symposion zur Feschriftübergabe Was machen eigentlich Gesellschaftsrechtler? Sie streiten z.B. über dreißig Jahre lang heftig und höchstpersönlich über eine – rechtsvergleichend betrachtet – Quisquilie wie die rechtliche Verselbständigung der Gesellschaft bürgerlichen Rechts. Die Sieger jubelten, als endlich der zweite BGH‐Senat den Gesetzestext in die Tonne trat. Solch ein Gesellschaftsrechtler ist Christian Kirchner nicht. Ich spreche im Präsens, denn sein Œuvre prägt gegenwärtig und damit zukunftsweisend. Christian Kirchner hat sich selbstverständlich mit aktuellen dogmatischen Fragen befasst, eben auch 1 mit den Bedingungen für die rechtliche Verselbständigung eines Personenverbandes, nur eben nicht unter Bemühung der Transsubstantation der Gesamthand von der Vermögenszuordnung zum Subjekt. Wer über Christian Kirchner als Gesellschaftsrechtler sprechen will, muss mit Heinrich Kronstein anfangen. Kronstein hat ein bahnbrechendes Buch geschrieben: „Die abhängige juristische Person“, erschienen 1931, das nicht den Kron‐, sondern den Grundstein für die Entwicklung eines Konzernrechts legte. Die Arbeit war als Habilitationsschrift gedacht, ein Habilitationsverfahren hat aber nie stattgefunden, weil Kronstein in die USA emigrieren musste, zum Glück ist das rechtzeitig gelungen. Dort wirkte er als Hochschullehrer u.a. an der Georgetown University und der Columbia University. Mit dieser reichen Erfahrung kehrte er nach dem Krieg nach -
Chancellor Adenauer Receives Honorary Doctor of Laws Degree
VOL. 5, No. 3 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL. WASHINGTON, 1). C. JUNE, 1953 WHELAN SELECTED AS BEST ADVOCATE IN FINAL ARGUMENT Chancellor Adenauer Receives Mr. Charles Marion Whelan S.J., I). C. '54, was adjudged the “best advocate of the school year” in the final Law Club Argument held on April 28. Honorary Doctor of Laws Degree The question under discussion involved the applicability of the double jeopardy provision in the Fifth Amendment to a case in which the defendant German Leader Accompanied by Secretary of State Hallstein was convicted of a federal offense on the third trial. At the first trial, the judge discharged the jury before verdict over the objection of the defendant, because the defense counsel exceeded the limits of cross-examination set by the Court. During the second t r i a l , ------------------------------------------------------ for which two alternate jurors had been sworn, the Court again dis LAW SCHOOL MEN CHAIR charged the jury before verdict over MEN OF DEMOCRATIC AND the objection of the defendant, be cause the Court discovered that a war REPUBLICAN NATIONAL rant had been issued for juror num ber six. COMMITTEES The well attended debate was heard The Chairmen of the Democratic before a Court consisting of Chief and Republican National Committees Judge Bolitha J. Laws T3, Judge are Georgetown Law School men. Walter M. Bastian T3 and Judge Ed They are Stephen A. Mitchell ’28 of ward M. Curran of the U. S. District the Democratic Committee and Leon Court for the District of Columbia. ard Wood Hall ’20 of the Republican The winning team representing the Committee. -
PRIVATE LAW DEVELOPMENT in CONTEXT Th Is Book Has Been Made Possible with the Support of the Fritz Th Yssen Foundation, Cologne PRIVATE LAW DEVELOPMENT in CONTEXT
PRIVATE LAW DEVELOPMENT IN CONTEXT Th is book has been made possible with the support of the Fritz Th yssen Foundation, Cologne PRIVATE LAW DEVELOPMENT IN CONTEXT German Private Law and Scholarship in the 20th Century Edited by Stefan Grundmann Karl Riesenhuber Cambridge – Antwerp – Portland Intersentia Ltd Sheraton House | Castle Park Cambridge | CB3 0AX | United Kingdom Tel.: +44 1223 370 170 | Fax: +44 1223 370 169 Email: [email protected] www.intersentia.com | www.intersentia.co.uk Distribution for the UK and Ireland: NBN International Airport Business Centre, 10 Th ornbury Road Plymouth, PL6 7PP United Kingdom Tel.: +44 1752 202 301 | Fax: +44 1752 202 331 Email: [email protected] Distribution for Europe and all other countries: Intersentia Publishing nv Groenstraat 31 2640 Mortsel Belgium Tel.: +32 3 680 15 50 | Fax: +32 3 658 71 21 Email: [email protected] Distribution for the USA and Canada: International Specialized Book Services 920 NE 58th Ave. Suite 300 Portland, OR 97213 USA Tel.: +1 800 944 6190 (toll free) | Fax: +1 503 280 8832 Email: [email protected] Private Law Development in Context. German Private Law and Scholarship in the 20th Century © Th e editors and contributors severally 2018 Th e editors and contributors have asserted the right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, to be identifi ed as authors of this work. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from Intersentia, or as expressly permitted by law or under the terms agreed with the appropriate reprographic rights organisation. -
German Foreign Affairs Secretary Discusses Schuman Plan on Visit to Georgetown
VOL. 4, NO. 3 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL. WASHINGTON, D. C. MAY 1952 German Foreign Affairs Secretary Discusses Schuman Plan On Visit to Georgetown The recent visit to Washington of Father Lucey and Dr. Kronstein Dr. Walter Hallstein, Secretary of participated in these discussions, sit State for Foreign Affairs in the Office ting on the rostrum with Dr. Hallstein. of the Chancellery of the Republic ot Representatives of the French Em Germany, was not only an event of bassy, Department of State, Inter significance in international affairs national Monetary Fund, German Mis but one of historic importance, as Dr. sion to the Mutual Security Adminis- Hallstein is the first outstanding Ger tration, Brookings Institute, American man leader to address an American Federation of Labor, Georgetown Uni- audience since the advent ot World versity, and other Universities were War II. The purpose of Dr. Hall- interested and active participants in a stein’s visit was to explain the Schu lively discussion which only ended man Plan for European Integration when Dr. Hallstein was compelled to on the economic level. He and Mon leave for a conference at the State sieur Jean Monnet of France have Department. been the outstanding authorities and Dr. Hallstein was no stranger to collaborators on this subject. By their Georgetown Law School, being the mutual efforts the plan has gained first exchange Professor with the Uni wide approval on the Continent. versity of Frankfurt. In the opening Due to the efforts of Dr. Heinrich remarks of his address at McDonough Kronstein, Professor of Law, and Gymnasium he paid a glowing tribute Reverend Francis E. -
The Refugee Jurist and American Law Schools, 1933-1941 Kyle Graham Santa Clara University School of Law, [email protected]
Santa Clara Law Santa Clara Law Digital Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2002 The Refugee Jurist and American Law Schools, 1933-1941 Kyle Graham Santa Clara University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs Recommended Citation 50 Am. J. Comp. L. 777 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KYLE GRAHAM The Refugee Jurist and American Law Schools, 1933-1941 The position of younger men, just about to enter upon their careeras academic men is almost more distressing than that of the fully arrived professor. The latter can find a home else- where. The former have the roots cut out from under them.1 - Yale Law School Professor Edwin Borchard, 1933 With patience younger men can fit into the American scheme 2 of things. Older men will find difficulty. - Borchard, 1938 In 1933, Adolf Hitler and his National Socialist party assumed control of the German government. Over the next decade, Nazi- orchestrated persecution would force hundreds of academics, includ- ing several dozen law teachers, from their positions at European uni- versities. 3 Many displaced jurists sought to continue their careers in the United States. They thought a spirit of scientific brotherhood and respect for Continental scholarship would impel U.S. law schools to grant them refuge and succor. -
National Security and Judicial Ethics: the Exception to the Rule of Keeping Judicial Conduct Judicial and the Politicization of the Judiciary
2020 National Security And Judicial Ethics: The Exception To The Rule Of Keeping Judicial Conduct Judicial And The Politicization Of The Judiciary Joshua E. Kastenberg Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/law_facultyscholarship Part of the Judges Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal History Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, and the National Security Law Commons KASTENBERGRTP.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 5/10/20 8:28 AM NATIONAL SECURITY AND JUDICIAL ETHICS: THE EXCEPTION TO THE RULE OF KEEPING JUDICIAL CONDUCT JUDICIAL AND THE POLITICIZATION OF THE JUDICIARY JOSHUA KASTENBERG I. DISQUALIFICATION AND THE MISTRETTA RULE ....................................................... 288 A. JUDICIAL RECUSAL RULES IN THE MODERN ERA ....................................................................... 291 B. JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS ............................................................................................................................................ 293 II. JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES, ADVICE, AND ENCOURAGEMENT: TAFT, STONE, AND BURGER ..................................................................................................................................................... 298 A. TAFT AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY EXCEPTION .................................................................... 302 B. STONE: OPPOSITION TO EXTRA-JUDICIAL CONDUCT BUT RESISTANCE TO HIS EXAMPLE ..........................................................................................................................................................................................