Herbert of Bosham's Interpretation Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Herbert of Bosham's Interpretation Of “CLOSER TO THE HEBREW”: HERBERT OF BOSHAM’S INTERPRETATION OF LITERAL EXEGESIS Eva De Visscher 1. Introduction Herbert of Bosham, whose life spans most of the twelft h century, made a name for himself in both ecclesiastical politics and in biblical exegesis.1 He was born c. 1120 in Bosham, an estuary port on the south coast of England in (now) West Sussex and died in or aft er 1194. Th e only snippet of information we possess about his family background suggests that his father entered priesthood aft er Herbert’s birth.2 As a young man Herbert left for the schools of Paris to study theology with Peter Lombard, and, like John of Salisbury and other contemporaries of similar educational background and ambitions, aft erwards obtained a position as clerk at the Angevin court. Court records reveal that on at least one occasion, in 1157, he acted as diplomatic envoy to Henry II; they also refer to him with the title of magister which, although the term at that time was used to denote elementary school masters as well as men who had completed a curriculum of higher study at the schools, here probably means that Herbert was Master in Th eology. Since in a letter dating from the later 1170s he mentions plans to begin a school of theology, it seems likely that he also possessed the licentia docendi.3 During his career at court Herbert met and befriended Th omas Becket. He was present at Becket’s anointment as Archbishop of Canterbury in 1162 and must have entered his service at around the same time. When relations between Henry II and Becket turned sour, Herbert proved himself a staunch supporter of his new patron, and 1 For the most recent comprehensive overview of his life, see Frank Barlow’s entry in H. C. G. Matthew and Brian Harrison, eds, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography: From the Earliest Times to the Year 2000, 6 (Oxford, 2004), pp. 711–713. 2 William FitzStephen, Vita Sancti Th omae, in Materials for the History of Th omas Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury, ed. J. C. Robertson, Rerum Britannicarum medii aevi scriptores 67, 3 (London, 1877, repr. 1965), pp. 98–101. 3 Beryl Smalley, Th e Becket Confl ict and the Schools: A Study of Intellectuals in Politics (Oxford, 1973), pp. 59–60, p. 71, n. 50. 250 eva de visscher one who seems to have done nothing to diminish the rift between the two opposing parties. He followed Becket into exile to France in 1164 and remained with him until shortly before the archbishop’s murder at Canterbury Cathedral in late 1170. Th eir years in France, which were largely spent at the abbeys of Saint-Bertin, Pontigny and Saint- Columba’s, outside Sens, with a shorter visit to Saint-Victor, fostered Herbert’s interests in biblical exegesis. As he recalls later in his hagio- graphical works on Becket, he would act as ‘master of the holy page’ (in divina pagina magister) to his patron and they would read the Psalms and the Epistles together.4 Becket’s death appears to have brought Herbert’s career in eccle- siastical politics to an abrupt end. Th e scant pieces of information that emerge about him in the 1170s paint a picture of a man rallying around support for the late archbishop’s canonisation and complain- ing of being poor and forgotten by the world.5 Yet it was during this latter period of his life that he produced his major writings. Two of these, titled Tomus (“Book” but also a pun on the name Th omas) and Liber Melorum (‘Book of Songs’) are hagiographies of Th omas Becket.6 A third, composed in the early 1170s, honours both his old master at Paris and his late patron with whom he used to study the Holy Page: it is an arrangement of Peter Lombard’s edition of the Great Gloss (Magna Glosatura) on the Psalms and the Epistles of Paul. Magnifi cently executed, the four volumes of this work appear to have been meticu- lously revised under close supervision of Herbert himself. Th ey were dedicated to William, Archbishop of Sens, then probably his patron, and eventually bequeathed to the Augustinian abbey at Canterbury. Around 1190, almost twenty years aft er his arrangement of the Gloss, Herbert completed a second commentary, simply titled Psalter with Commen- tary (Psalterium cum commento), which focuses on the Psalms only. He was at that time living at the Cistercian abbey of Ourscamp, in the diocese of Arras in Flanders, and had found a new patron in William of Longchamp, bishop of Ely, and possibly in Peter, bishop of Arras, to whom the commentary is dedicated. Th e last years of Herbert’s life 4 Smalley, Becket Confl ict, pp. 61–63. 5 PL 190:1422; Smalley, Becket Confl ict, p. 65, n. 23. 6 For editions of his works, see Herberti de Boseham, S. Th omae Cantuariensis clerici a secretis, opera quae extant omnia, ed. I. A. Giles, 2 vols. (Oxford, 1845–46); Vita Sanctae Th omae and Liber Melorum, Materials, ed. Robertson, 3; Epistulae, Materials, ed. J. B. Sheppard, 67 (London, 1885)..
Recommended publications
  • Parish Emergency Plan, a Copy of Which Wil L Be Lodged with C DC , Fits with the Inter - Agency Arrangements
    PA RISH E MERGENC Y PLAN Adopted 3 December 2020 Date of revision Comments 1 INDEX Section 1 Emergency Arrangements Section 2 Emergency Coordinator Section 3 Volunteers Section 4 Council and Emergency Services Section 5 Advice for Emergency Situations Section 6 Parish Tem porary Accommoda tion Section 7 Services, Voluntary Groups, Media Section 8 Parish Councillors Section 9 District & County Councillors, Member of Parliament Section 10 Health & Safe ty Guidan ce Section 11 Local Map 2 Section 1 - EMER GENCY ARRANG EM ENTS M ajor Emergency The definition of a ‘Major Incident’ or ‘Major Emergency’ as supplied by CDC (CDC) is, “an incident endangering or likely to endanger life and property that to deal wit h would b e beyond the scope and facilities of normal da y to day operation al capabilities of those services responding”. Such incidents can occur anywhere at any time and often without warning. Response In normal circumstances the response to a major emer gency wou ld come from the inter - agency arrangements for malised between th e Emergency Services and C DC . Sussex Police would probably take the initial lead in co - ordinating the operation. In these circumstances the role of the Parish Council at a major emer gency aff ecting the Parish woul d be to assist the Emergency Services and CDC when requested by providing local knowledge and resources including organising local volunteers. Operations would come under the direction of the Police or District Council. It is theref or e important that this Parish Emergency Plan, a copy of which wil l be lodged with C DC , fits with the inter - agency arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Woolbeding Common to Midhurst
    Liphook River Rother Midhurst South New Downs South Lipchis Way Downs Total trail length 62.4 km / 39 miles. Total trail climb 645 m / 2,116 ft. LIPHOOK Midhurst RAMBLERS Town Council River Lavant Singleton Footprints of Sussex Chichester Pear Tree Cottage, Jarvis Lane, Steyning, West Sussex BN44 3GL www.newlipchisway.co.uk East Head Logo design – West Sussex County Council West Wittering Printed by – Wests Printing Works Ltd., Steyning, West Sussex Designed by – [email protected] 0 5 10 km © 2012 Footprints of Sussex 0 5 miles Welcome to the New New Lipchis Way This delightful walking trail follows existing rights of way over its 39 mile/62.4 kilometre route from Liphook, on Lipchis Way the Hampshire/West Sussex border, to East Head at the entrance to Chichester Harbour through the heart of the South Downs National Park. Being aligned north-south, it crosses all the main geologies of West Sussex from the greensand ridges, through Wealden river valleys and heathlands, to the high chalk downland and the coastal plain. In so doing it offers a great variety of scenery, flora and fauna. The trail logo reflects this by depicting the South Downs, the River Rother and Chichester Harbour. It can be walked energetically in three days, bearing in mind that the total ‘climb’ is around 650 metres/2,000 feet. The maps divide it into six sections, which although unequal in distance, break the route into stages that allow the possible use of public transport. There is a good choice of accommodation and restaurants in Liphook, Midhurst and Chichester, elsewhere there is a smattering of pubs and B&Bs – although the northern section is a little sparse in that respect.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosham Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2014– 2029
    Bosham Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2014– 2029 September 2016 Post Examination Version Bosham Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2014 - 2029 Contents: - page Foreword 3 1. Introduction and Background 4 2. The Neighbourhood Plan and its Vision for Bosham 14 3. Sustainable Growth for the Parish 15 4. Strategy 16 5. The Neighbourhood Plan Policies 17 1. The Settlement Boundary 19 2. Criteria for Housing Development 21 3. Commercial and Economic Development 22 4. Community Facilities 27 5. Conservation of the Historic Environment 30 6. Landscape and the Environment 39 7. Ecology, Wildlife and Biodiversity 46 8. Flooding and Drainage 48 9. Transport and Highways 56 6. Infrastructure 60 7. Monitoring and Review 63 2 Foreword Neighbourhood planning was introduced by the Localism Act 2011 and provides communities with the opportunity to shape the future development of their town or parish by putting in place a Neighbourhood Development Plan. In December 2012 Bosham Parish Council ("BPC") applied to Chichester District Council ("CDC") for the designation of the Bosham parish boundary as the Neighbourhood Plan Area. This designation was made on 18th March 2013 and work on the Bosham Parish Neighbourhood Plan began. The Bosham Parish Neighbourhood Plan ("BPNP") has been produced by a Project Team appointed by and reporting to BPC and as a result of the careful consideration of numerous consultation exercises and responses from the community and a wide variety of local stakeholders. Detailed consideration has also been given to numerous evidential sources including local survey information and higher level planning policies and guidance. This work has been undertaken with the assistance of the Bosham Association and community volunteers and with the advice and support of the CDC and the Chichester Harbour Conservancy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Plastic World Plastics Have Become the Big Environmental Story of the Day
    Spring 2019 Friends of Chichester Harbour Newsletter In this issue: The Friends check on the state of the harbour footpaths p3 Bosham’s fine furniture maker p9 A Plastic World Plastics have become the big environmental story of the day. Read how a project that started in Chichester Harbour with the help of The Friends is now being used around the world to help rid our coastlines of microplastics www.friendsch.org 1 Dear Friends Welcome to our spring edition of the newsletter. In the double our subscription income. newsletter you will find a precis of my report at the AGM Looking forward, and with pressures and a rather more comprehensive resumé of the fascinating growing on the AONB, the Trustees talk by David Jones. are anxious to ensure that the charity can respond positively to new and There are a couple of membership issues I need to raise ongoing projects across the harbour. with you. The first is that subscriptions will rise in April Even after the increase to £20 for an across all membership categories. The current £10 per annual single membership it will still be significantly lower annum per person hardly covers the cost of printing and than many other local and national organisations. postage for the 2 newsletters - let alone all the other costs that are incurred - auditing our accounts, IT software and Secondly we need you all to check your gift aid status on maintenance, materials, work party uniforms, AGM costs our membership record. Could you please look at your and so on. We regularly dip into the extra donations which personal details on the website, and let the membership account for nearly 60% of our income.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stone Coffins of Bosham Church
    FROM THE ARCHIVES: THE STONE COFFINS OF BOSHAM CHURCH I have kept to the old spelling of Canute throughout this article, since this was how it was spelt until quite recently, but it is now more usual to spell it ‘Cnut’. Is King Canute’s Daughter buried in Bosham Church? Unfortunately, it is not possible to give a definite answer to this question but I did think that visitors to the church via the website or in person to the church itself, might be interested in the long held tradition that King Canute’s daughter was drowned in the millstream early in the 11 th century, and buried in Bosham church and the subsequent finding of a small stone coffin in front of the chancel arch in 1865. Canute was King of England from 1016-1035 and although we have no written evidence that Canute had a Manor House in Bosham or indeed ever had time to come to Bosham, this tradition has been handed down from generation to generation and the story has gradually evolved over the years from Saxon princess to King Canute’s daughter. There is also the little stone effigy which is on the recessed tomb by the organ in the chancel of the church and which was thought to represent the little princess but carved much later, possibly, in the reign of Edward I (1272-1307), as a suitable memorial to her. The effigy and tomb do not appear to go together. In 1865 when considerable restoration work was being done in the church the Reverend Henry Mitchell, Vicar of Bosham from 1845-1912, decided to take the opportunity to test this long held tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • SIDLESHAM FOOTBALL CLUB the Memorial Ground Selsey
    SIDLESHAM FOOTBALL CLUB SIDLESHAM FC FULLY SUPPORTS THE AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE ‘LETS KICK RACISM OUT OF FOOTBALL CAMPAIGN. FOUL LANGUAGE AND The Memorial ground RACIALLY MOTIVATED ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED Selsey Road, AND OFFENDERS WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE THE GROUND Sidlesham, Chichester, SIDLESHAM FC DOES NOT ACCEPT LIABILITY FOR ANY West Sussex. INJURIES TO SPECTATORS OR CLAIMS OF ANY KIND COMMITTEE RESULTING FROM INCIDENTS EITHER IN THE GROUND OR ITS SURROUNDING AREA. ALL SPECTATORS ARE PRESIDENT CYRIL COOPER ASKED TO REMAIN BEHIND THE PERIMETER RAIL AT CHAIRMAN LES JEWISS ALL TIMES SECRETARY STEVE CARSON TREASURER PETER DANIEL FEEL FREE TO PURCHASE DRINKS AT THE BAR BUT FUNDRAISING GROUNDSMAN REMEMBER THAT GLASSES ARE NOT PERMITTED AT PROGRAMME PERRY NORTHEAST THE PITCH SIDE. PLEASE ASK OUR BAR STAFF FOR A ROSIE COLTON PLASTIC ALTERNATIVE AND THEY WILL SUPPLY YOU LESLEY ATKINSON BARRY WITH ONE KEVIN PLAYLE-HOWARD TRACEY PLAYLE-HOWARD 1st TEAM MANAGER DAVE DANIEL ASSISTANT MANAGER NEIL SHERLOCK PHYSIO 2nd TEAM MANAGER SAM BEATTIE Good afternoon everybody and a warm welcome to the players, officials and supporters of Uckfield GOALS Town, another unknown team to us at Sidlesham. A run of only one defeat (1-0 to table toppers JAMES COATES (CORTEZ) 4 Bosham) in their last 7 league outings has put them MOMs in a strong 4th position, which means we can expect another tough game at the memorial ground today. I would also like to welcome our referee MARK CARRINGTON (CAZ) 2 for today Andrew Carter. I’d also like to officially announce club Secre- APPERANCES tary Steve Carson as my assistant for the rest of the season.
    [Show full text]
  • Shopper Bus SAINSBURY's CHICHESTER
    Shopper Bus SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER C1 - Mondays only C2 - Wednesdays only Petworth Hampers Green 0940 Old Bosham Bosham Walk 1005 Petworth Square 0945 Bosham White Swan 1013 Duncton Cricketers 0955 Arundel Park Windsor Road 1019 Upwaltham Letterbox 1002 St James Road 1021 Halnaker Crossroads 1010 SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER arr 1026 SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER arr 1020 SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER dep 1205 SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER dep 1150 (return journey) (return journey) C4 - Tuesdays, Thursdays & Fridays C3 - Mondays only Tu/Th Fri Midhurst Bus Stand 1100 Bognor Regis High Street 0915 1015 Holmbush Way 1105 Bognor Regis Victoria Drive 0918 1018 Cocking Post Office 1111 Aldwick Road Post Office 0922 1022 Singleton Grooms Yard 1116 West Meads Oxford Drive 0927 1027 West Dean Selsey Arms 1120 Rose Green St Anthonys Church 0932 1032 Lavant Yarbrook Cottages 1126 Willowhale Elbridge Crescent 0936 1036 Summersdale The Avenue 1131 Pagham Shopping Centre 0944 1044 SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER arr 1140 Nyetimber Bear Inn 0948 1048 SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER dep 1300 North Mundham School 0954 1054 (return journey) SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER arr 1006 1106 C5 - Tuesdays & Thursdays SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER dep 1140 1240 (return journey) Yapton North End 1032 Yapton Sparks Corner 1034 C6 - Wednesdays & Fridays Elmer Templesheen Road 1041 Selsey Seal Road 0855 Middleton Sea Lane 1044 Selsey East Beach Car Park 0904 Flansham Park Alfriston Close 1046 Selsey Church 0908 Felpham The Southdowns 1048 Sidlesham Manhood Lane 0915 Felpham Post Office 1052 Hunston Spotted Cow 0923 Bognor
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Natives
    ‘Real Natives’ A Study of the History of Oyster Fishing in Chichester Harbour for the Sussex Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authority Dr Ian Friel MA, PhD, FSA © Ian Friel 2020 Oysters - a once-common food Poor food for friars ‘Give me then of thy gold, to make our cloister’, Quoth he, ‘for many a mussel and many an oyster ‘When other men have been full well at ease ‘Hath been our food, our cloister for to raise’ Geoffrey Chaucer, The Summoner’s Tale, c 1387-88 A Chichester bet In 1813 a man named Martin from Dell Quay Mill and another named Fogden from Donnington met at Chalkright’s fishmonger shop in South Street, Chichester, to settle a bet as to who could eat the most oysters: ‘in a short time each swallowed four hundred large ones’ until Martin called for a halt. Fogden agreed, as long as Martin paid for the oysters. They then went to the King’s Head for a glass of brandy, followed by an eel pie supper at Martin’s house. Ipswich Journal, 11 December 1813, p 1 The London Oyster Season opens: Billingsgate Fishmarket, August 1835: ‘At an early hour a scene of unusual bustle and confusion was apparent. Not less than 5,000 persons were in waiting to be served with the ‘real natives’, while the streets in the vicinity were blocked up with every species of locomotive vehicle to convey the oysters to the various quarters of the metropolis. There were no less than fifty sail of vessels in front of Billingsgate laden with oysters, chiefly from the Kentish coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Location of the AONB The Chichester Harbour Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (the AONB) is located in the counties of West Sussex and Hampshire on the southern coast of England (Fig 1). The AONB forms an irregular area, its boundary following a number of roads and other features, including the harbour mouth, to enclose some 74 sq km. The western boundary of the AONB is marked by the B2179 through West Wittering, along the A286 to Dell Quay where the boundary continues north up Appledram Lane to meet the Chichester By Pass. The A259 constitutes the long northern boundary of the AONB. The boundary turns south down Bath Road, heading west along the coast to rejoin the A259, then turning south at Langstone and crossing the Langstone Bridge. The eastern boundary follows field boundaries and minor roads down the east coast of Hayling Island. The ‘corners’ of this irregular area are marked by the NGRs 472680 105845, 474475 97505, 484020 100890, and 484230 104605. The area encompasses a number of small picturesque harbour villages, including Itchenor, Dell Quay, Bosham, Bosham Hoe, Chidham, West Thorney and parts of West Wittering, Fishbourne, Nutbourne, and Prinsted, as well as the major ‘arms’ of Chichester Harbour itself – Emsworth Channel, Thorney Channel, Chichester Channel and Bosham Channel. It includes a broad range of landscapes and seascapes providing continuity from inland areas through marginal land and intertidal ranges to underwater sites in the channels. The Harbour is a recognised archaeological and historical resource as well as a valued natural environment. Status of the AONB The status of the AONB was designated by order on 7 July 1963, and this was confirmed by order on 4 February 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman – AD 43-410
    Roman – AD 43-410 Roman material is scattered throughout the AONB, with – as might be expected – a concentration near Fishbourne Palace that lies on the border of the AONB (Fig 12). The Roman invasion of AD 43 resulted in major changes in social and economic conditions as well as changes in technology. It represents the start of one of the most dynamic and distinctive episodes in the history of South-East England. The location of the landing spot has been the subject of debate, with Richborough in Kent favoured by the ‘traditional view,’ although locations in the Chichester/Solent area have also been suggested. Arguments supporting Sussex/Hampshire landings include: • The Roman desire to restore King Verica to his Atrebatic kingdom located in parts of the modern counties of Sussex, Surrey, Hampshire and Berkshire; • The presence along this part of the south coast of safe harbours; • The advantages from the Roman point of view of starting their campaign in friendly territory where they could perhaps rely on safe disembarkment and local support; (Rudling 2003). However, there is no definite archaeological evidence from Sussex for the invasion itself. The official reason in the Roman period given by Dio Cassius for the invasion was the expulsion of the invaders of King Verica’s territory, who fled to Rome. Martin Henig (1998, 2002), who has suggested that it was more a question of ‘Roman liberation’ rather than conquest, said that Britain’s Romanised southern rulers may have welcomed the arrival of the Romans and profited from it afterwards. This point of view seems supported by the absence of contemporary forts in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Chidham & Hambrook
    The History of Chidham & Hambrook Introduction by Steve Tanner The Oxford book of place names gives the name Chidham as being derived from the Old English word CEOD, meaning a bag or pouch and HAM meaning a settlement. Chidham being therefore, the pouch-like bag settlement. It is thought the shape of the Chidham peninsula gives rise to the ‘pouch- like bag’ description. Unlike Chidham, HAM at the beginning of the name means a rock and therefore Hambrook refers to a place where the spring gushes from the rock. Chidham is not mentioned in the Domesday survey of 1086, being then included in the Bishop of Exeter’s estate of the Chapelry of Bosham. In 1121 Bishop Warlewaste of Exeter founded the College of Bosham with six prebends, which were Bosham parochial, Appledram, Chidham, Funtington, Walton and Westbrook. It is doubtful whether the prebend of Chidham worked in the parish, as there was a separate vicarage of Chidham, Andrew Prous being the first recorded vicar in 1261. The first mention of the Lord of the Manor of Chidham is in a document entitled “The Confirmatory Grant of the Chapelry”, dated 1243, naming the Bishop of Exeter as Lord of the Manor of Chidham and having small tenants, who were his servants, in the Hamlet of Westerton. By this time there were already three tithings, the other two being Middleton and Easton. After the dissolution of the College of Bosham, the Bishop conveyed the Manor of Chidham to Thomas Fisher in 1548. Thomas then transferred it to Henry Bickley, in whose family it remained passing to his son Thomas and grandson Thomas, who died in 1640.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Report for Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of Selsey Neighbourhood Plan Stage D of the SEA Process July 2019
    Environmental Report for Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of Selsey Neighbourhood Plan Stage D of the SEA Process July 2019 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 2. The Strategic Environmental Assessment Process ......................................................................... 3 3. Stage B: Scoping ............................................................................................................................. 4 4. Stage C: Main SEA of the Neighbourhood Plan – Assessing the Effects ......................................... 5 Table 1: SEA framework for Selsey Neighbourhood Plan. ........................................................................... 5 Table 2. SEA assessment of policies within Selsey Neighbourhood Plan .................................................... 2 Table 3. SEA assessment of policy 004 and allocation ................................................................................ 4 5. Summary of Effects......................................................................................................................... 6 6. Monitoring Framework .................................................................................................................. 6 7. Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 6 8. Stage E - The Consultation Exercise ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]