Black Carbon Measurement Methods and Emission Factors from Ships

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Black Carbon Measurement Methods and Emission Factors from Ships Black Carbon Measurement Methods and Emission Factors from Ships December 2016 Prepared for: International Council on Clean Transportation: Dr. Dan Rutherford, Program Director and Dr. Bryan Comer, Researcher 1225 Eye St. NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 +1 (202) 407-8345 Report Prepared by: University of California, Riverside: Dr. Kent Johnson, Dr. Wayne Miller, Dr. Tom Durbin, Yu (Jade) Jiang, Jiacheng (Joey) Yang, Dr. George Karavalakis, and Dr. David Cocker Task 1 Contributions University of California, Riverside Emmanuel Fofi, Dr. Heejung Jung, Yue Lin, Dr. Akua Asa-Awuku, and Dr. Roya Bahreini National Research Council Canada: Dr. Kevin Thomson, Dr. Stéphanie Gagné Environment and Climate Change Canada: Dr. Tak Chan Sun Set Laboratories: Dr. Bob Cary Minnesota State University, Dr. Jacob Swanson Inventory Section Contribution Easter Research Group Dr. John Koupal Acknowledgement Research team for the Task 1 Marine Black Carbon ICCT Project Equipment in-kind loans Task 1 o HTDMA AVL Filter Smoke Number (FSN) Task 1-3 o MAAP SunSet Labs SemiCont EC/OC California Air Resources Board EEPS South Coast Air Quality Management NTK-Sparkplugs Stack OBD NOX /PM/PN District (SC-AQMD) Aethalometer Sensor National Resource Canada o Two (2) LIIs Contractors o RAMAN, Dr. Gavin McMeeking, Handix Scientific, LLC o TEM analysis Environment and Climate Change Faculty, Technical Support, and Graduate Canada Students o LII Dr. Kelley Barsanti, Lindsay Hatch o Rotating disk dilutor Don Pacocha, Eddie O’Neil, Mark Villa, o CPC David Buote (E.C.), Danny Gomez, Rachael UC Riverside Hirst, and Lauren Aycock o GC by GC Paul Van Rooy, Justin Hernandez Dingle, o AMS and Eric Peng o SMPS o CPC o PAX 375 nm 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgement ................................................................................................................ 2 Table of Contents .................................................................................................................. 1 List of Figures ........................................................................................................................ 5 List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 8 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 15 2 Background ................................................................................................................... 16 2.1 Policy context ................................................................................................................................ 16 2.1.1 Defining marine BC ................................................................................................................. 16 2.1.2 Measuring marine BC ............................................................................................................. 16 2.1.3 Control Measures for Marine BC Emissions ........................................................................... 17 2.2 Black carbon measurement methods ........................................................................................... 17 2.3 Marine vessel black carbon emissions .......................................................................................... 19 2.4 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 20 2.5 Organization of the Report ............................................................................................................ 20 3 Task 1 Engine Test Stand ................................................................................................ 21 3.1 Research approach ........................................................................................................................ 21 3.1.1 Test article .............................................................................................................................. 21 3.1.1.1 Test engine ...................................................................................................................... 21 3.1.1.2 Test fuel ........................................................................................................................... 21 3.1.1.3 Test matrix ....................................................................................................................... 23 3.1.2 Sample conditioning ............................................................................................................... 24 3.1.2.1 Catalytic stripper ............................................................................................................. 24 3.1.2.2 Sulfur adsorber ................................................................................................................ 25 3.1.2.3 CS Operation.................................................................................................................... 26 3.1.2.4 BC particle line losses ...................................................................................................... 27 3.1.2.5 Dilution Ratio ................................................................................................................... 29 3.1.3 Measurements ....................................................................................................................... 29 3.1.3.1 Instruments ..................................................................................................................... 29 3.1.3.2 Layout .............................................................................................................................. 30 3.1.3.3 Instrument/method descriptions .................................................................................... 32 3.1.3.4 BC and PM calibration ..................................................................................................... 33 3.2 Results ........................................................................................................................................... 36 1 3.2.1 Regulated emissions (g/kWh) ................................................................................................. 36 3.2.1.1 Gaseous ........................................................................................................................... 36 3.2.1.2 PM2.5 ................................................................................................................................ 37 3.2.2 BC emission factors (g/kWh) .................................................................................................. 40 3.2.2.1 Raw sampling effects –no conditioning .......................................................................... 40 3.2.2.2 Raw sampling effects – with conditioning ...................................................................... 41 3.2.2.3 Dilution effects = 14 to 1 ................................................................................................. 42 3.2.2.4 Dilution effects = 1400 to 1 ............................................................................................. 44 3.2.3 BC instrument correlations .................................................................................................... 45 3.2.3.1 No calibration .................................................................................................................. 45 3.2.3.2 Post-hoc Calibration ........................................................................................................ 48 3.2.4 Particulate emissions .............................................................................................................. 51 3.2.4.1 TEM.................................................................................................................................. 51 3.2.4.2 Hygroscopicity ................................................................................................................. 53 3.2.4.3 CPC................................................................................................................................... 54 3.2.4.4 PSD .................................................................................................................................. 55 3.3 Recommendations for On-Board Testing ...................................................................................... 57 3.3.1 Recommended instruments ................................................................................................... 57 4 Task 2 At-Sea: Modern Engine and VSR .......................................................................... 61 4.1 Approach ....................................................................................................................................... 61 4.1.1 Test article .............................................................................................................................. 61 4.1.1.1 Ocean going vessel .......................................................................................................... 61 4.1.1.2 Engine .............................................................................................................................. 61 4.1.1.3 Maintenance records .....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Steady State and Transient Efficiencies of A
    STEADY STATE AND TRANSIENT EFFICIENCIES OF A FOUR CYLINDER DIRECT INJECTION DIESEL ENGINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION IN A HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Science Charles Van Horn August, 2006 STEADY STATE AND TRANSIENT EFFICIENCIES OF A FOUR CYLINDER DIRECT INJECTION DIESEL ENGINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION IN A HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE Charles Van Horn Thesis Approved: Accepted: Advisor Department Chair Dr. Scott Sawyer Dr. Celal Batur Faculty Reader Dean of the College Dr. Richard Gross Dr. George K. Haritos Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Iqbal Husain Dr. George R. Newkome Date ii ABSTRACT The efficiencies of a four cylinder direct injection diesel engine have been investigated for the implementation in a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV). The engine was cycled through various operating points depending on the power and torque requirements for the HEV. The selected engine for the HEV is a 2005 Volkswagen 1.9L diesel engine. The 2005 Volkswagen 1.9L diesel engine was tested to develop the steady-state engine efficiencies and to evaluate the transient effects on these efficiencies. The peak torque and power curves were developed using a water brake dynamometer. Once these curves were obtained steady-state testing at various engine speeds and powers was conducted to determine engine efficiencies. Transient operation of the engine was also explored using partial throttle and variable throttle testing. The transient efficiency was compared to the steady-state efficiencies and showed a decrease from the steady- state values.
    [Show full text]
  • Diesel and Fuel-Oil Engines
    HdiiUiiat uuioTAt* VI i nPicrence moK not to do AUG 2 ^ : , CuKCH JlUili lilO L, iDi slil CS102E-42 Jf' Engines, Diese! and fuei-oil (export classifications) U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE JESSE H. JONES, Secretary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS LYMAN J. BRIGGS, Director DIESEL AND FUEL-OIL ENGINES (Export Classifications) COMMERCIAL STANDARD CS102E-42 Effective Date for New Production from October 30, 1942 A RECORDED VOLUNTARY STANDARD OF THE TRADE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1942 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 10 cents . U. S. Department of Commerce National Bureau of Standard? PROMULGATION of COMMERCIAL STANDARD CS102E-42 for DIESEL AND FUEL-OIL ENGINES (Export Classifications) On January 30, 1942, at the instance of the Diesel Engine Manu- facturers’ Association, a conference of representative manufacturers adopted a recommended commercial standard for Diesel and fuel -oil engines (export classifications). Those concerned have since accepted and approved the standard as shown herein for promulgation by the U. S. Department of Commerce, through the National Bureau of Standards. The standard is effective for new production from October 30, 1942. Promulgation recommended I. J. Fairchild, Chieff Division of Trade Standards, Promulgated. Lyman J. Briggs, Director^ National Bureau of Standards, Promulgation approved. Jesse H. Jones, Secretary of Commerce. II DIESEL AND FUEL-OIL ENGINES (Export Classifications) COMMERCIAL STANDARD CS102E-42 PARTS Page 1. Nomenclature and definitions.. ' 1 2. Slow- and medium-speed stationary Diesel engines 7 3. Slow- and medium-speed marine Diesel engines 13 4. Small, medium- and high-speed stationary, marine, and portable Diesel engines 19 5.
    [Show full text]
  • ! National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics
    ! . \ i NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS TECHNICAL NOTE No. 1374 EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE KNOCK - LIlvITTED BLENDIDG CHARACTERISTICS OF AVIATION FUELS II - INVESTIGATION OF LEADED PARAFFINIC FUELS IN AN AIR-COOLED CYLrnDER By Jerrold D. Wear and Newell D. Sanders Flight Propulsion Research Laboratory Cleveland, Ohio Washington July 1947 , \ I NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS TN 1374 EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE KNOCK-LIMITED BLENDING CH.~~ACTERISTICS OF AVIATION FUELS II - INVESTIGATION OF LEADED PARAFFINIC FUELS IN ~~ AIR-COOLED CYLINDER By Jerrold D. Wear and. Newell D. Sanders SUMMARY The relation between knock limit and blend composition of selected aviation fuel components individually blended with virgin base and ''lith alkylate was determined in a full-scale air-cooled aircraft-·engine cylinder. In addition the follow­ ing correlations were examined: (a) The knock-·limited performance of a full -scale engine at lean-mixture operation plotted against the knock-limited perform­ ance of the engine at rich-mixture operation for a series of fuels (b) The knock-limited performance of a full-scale engine at rich-mixture operation plotted against the knock-limited perform­ ance at rich-mixture operation of a small-scale engine for a series of fuels In each case the following methods of specifying the knock­ limi ted perfOl'IDanCe of the engine were investigated: (l) Knock·-limited indicated mean effective pressure (2) percentage of S-4 plus 4 ml T~~ per gallon in M-4 plus 4 ml TEL per gallon to give an equal knock-limited indicated mean effective pressure (3) Ratio of indicated mean effective pressure of test fuel ~o indicated mean effective pressure of clear S-4 reference fuel, all other conditions being the same .
    [Show full text]
  • An Experimental Study on Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Hydrogen Fuelled Spark Ignition Engine
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DSpace@IZTECH Institutional Repository International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 32 (2007) 2066–2072 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhydene An experimental study on performance and emission characteristics of a hydrogen fuelled spark ignition engine Erol Kahramana, S. Cihangir Ozcanlıb, Baris Ozerdemb,∗ aProgram of Energy Engineering, Izmir Institute of Technology, Urla, Izmir 35430, Turkey bDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Izmir Institute of Technology, Urla, Izmir 35430, Turkey Received 2 August 2006; accepted 2 August 2006 Available online 2 October 2006 Abstract In the present paper, the performance and emission characteristics of a conventional four cylinder spark ignition (SI) engine operated on hydrogen and gasoline are investigated experimentally. The compressed hydrogen at 20 MPa has been introduced to the engine adopted to operate on gaseous hydrogen by external mixing. Two regulators have been used to drop the pressure first to 300 kPa, then to atmospheric pressure. The variations of torque, power, brake thermal efficiency, brake mean effective pressure, exhaust gas temperature, and emissions of NOx, CO, CO2, HC, and O2 versus engine speed are compared for a carbureted SI engine operating on gasoline and hydrogen. Energy analysis also has studied for comparison purpose. The test results have been demonstrated that power loss occurs at low speed hydrogen operation whereas high speed characteristics compete well with gasoline operation. Fast burning characteristics of hydrogen have permitted high speed engine operation. Less heat loss has occurred for hydrogen than gasoline. NOx emission of hydrogen fuelled engine is about 10 times lower than gasoline fuelled engine.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Intelligence for the Prediction of Exhaust Back Pressure Effect On
    applied sciences Article Artificial Intelligence for the Prediction of Exhaust Back Pressure Effect on the Performance of Diesel Engines Vlad Fernoaga 1 , Venetia Sandu 2,* and Titus Balan 1 1 Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Transilvania University, Brasov 500036, Romania; [email protected] (V.F.); [email protected] (T.B.) 2 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Transilvania University, Brasov 500036, Romania * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +40-268-474761 Received: 11 September 2020; Accepted: 15 October 2020; Published: 21 October 2020 Featured Application: This paper presents solutions for smart devices with embedded artificial intelligence dedicated to vehicular applications. Virtual sensors based on neural networks or regressors provide real-time predictions on diesel engine power loss caused by increased exhaust back pressure. Abstract: The actual trade-off among engine emissions and performance requires detailed investigations into exhaust system configurations. Correlations among engine data acquired by sensors are susceptible to artificial intelligence (AI)-driven performance assessment. The influence of exhaust back pressure (EBP) on engine performance, mainly on effective power, was investigated on a turbocharged diesel engine tested on an instrumented dynamometric test-bench. The EBP was externally applied at steady state operation modes defined by speed and load. A complete dataset was collected to supply the statistical analysis and machine learning phases—the training and testing of all the AI solutions developed in order to predict the effective power. By extending the cloud-/edge-computing model with the cloud AI/edge AI paradigm, comprehensive research was conducted on the algorithms and software frameworks most suited to vehicular smart devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Napier Sabre Engines Will Be Found on Page L75
    STAITDARDIZRD DATA PAGES FOR RECIPROCATIITG EITCTI\ES Standardized data pages are used to present the specifieations of the basic aircraft engines and airhorne auxiliary units described and illustrated in the followirg section of the book. The arrangeme'nt of the data on the standardi zed" data pages is as f ollows : First, there is a concise description of the engine, its construe tion and the major accessories with which it is equipped. Then, in tabular form, there are items such as bore, stroke, displacement (swept vol- ume), compression ratio, overall dimensions, frontal areae total weight and weight per maximum horsepolyer. F'uel and lubricating oiX eonsumptions at cruising output are given in units of weight. The fuel grade and the viscosity of the lubricating oil at 210o F" (100o C) also are specified. Efficiency figures such as maximum power output per unit of dis- placement, maximum polver output per unit of piston area) maximum piston speed and maximum brake mean effective pressure have been ealculated for comparative purposes. Finally, the various horsepower ratings of the engine are given, such as; Take-off rating, or the maxinrum horsepower which it is per- missibil to ,ruJ at sea level and at low altitrdes. flrlilitary (combat) rating, or the maximum horsepower which it is perrnissib]e to use for military purposes at various alti- tudes. fVorrual rating,, or the ntaximum horsepower which the engine can deliver continuously for climh without undue stress" Cruising ratirug, or the maximum horsepo\,ver recommended for continuous operation consistent with reasonable fuel econ- omy. Ern,ergerlcy rating, or the marximum horsepower which it is permissible use a _ to for short period of time in an ernergency.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Various Ignition Timings on Combustion Process and Performance of Gasoline Engine
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS AGRICULTURAE ET SILVICULTURAE MENDELIANAE BRUNENSIS Volume 65 58 Number 2, 2017 https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201765020545 EFFECT OF VARIOUS IGNITION TIMINGS ON COMBUSTION PROCESS AND PERFORMANCE OF GASOLINE ENGINE Lukas Tunka1, Adam Polcar1 Department of Technology and Automobile Transport, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic Abstract TUNKA LUKAS, POLCAR ADAM. 2017. Effect of Various Ignition Timings on Combustion Process and Performance of Gasoline Engine. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 65(2): 545–554. This article deals with the effect of the ignition timing on the output parameters of a spark-ignition engine. The main assessed parameters include the output parameters of the engine (engine power and torque), cylinder pressure variation, heat generation and burn rate. However, the article also discusses the effect of the ignition timing on the temperature of exhaust gases, the indicated mean effective pressure, the combustion duration, combustion stability, etc. All measurements were performed in an engine test room in the Department of Technology and Automobile Transport at Mendel University in Brno, on a four-cylinder AUDI engine with a maximum power of 110 kW, as indicated by the manufacturer. To control and change the ignition timing of the engine, a fully programmable Magneti Marelli control unit was used. The experimental measurements were performed on 8 different ignition timings, from 18 °CA to 32 °CA BTDC at wide throttle open and a constant engine speed (2500 rpm), with a stoichiometric mixture fraction. The measurement results showed that as the ignition timing increases, the engine power and torque also increase.
    [Show full text]
  • Engine Testing This Page Intentionally Left Blank Engine Testing Theory and Practice
    Engine Testing This page intentionally left blank Engine Testing Theory and Practice Third edition A.J. Martyr M.A. Plint AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON • NEW YORK • OXFORD PARIS • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Butterworth-Heinemann is an imprint of Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann is an imprint of Elsevier Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803 First edition 1995 Reprinted 1996 (twice), 1997 (twice) Second edition 1999 Reprinted 2001, 2002 Third edition 2007 Copyright © 2007, A.J. Martyr and M.A. Plint. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved The right of A.J. Martyr and M.A. Plint to be identified as the authors of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (+44) (0) 1865 843830; fax: (+44) (0) 1865 853333; email: [email protected]. Alternatively you can submit your request online by visiting the Elsevier web site at http://elsevier.com/locate/permissions, and selecting Obtaining permission to use Elsevier material Notice No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington, 0. C. Washington Sept Ember 1942 J •
    TECHNICAL NOTES NA~lONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS No . 861 TEE EFFECT OF VALVE COOLING UPO N MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE ENGINE OUTFUT AS LIMITED BY KNOCK ]y Mauri ce Munger, H. D. Wilsted, and B. A. Mu lcahy Langley Me morial Aeronauti cal Laboratory Langl ey Field, Va. COpy To be returned to t files of the Nati nil Advisory Commi rt for Aeronautics Washington, 0. C. Washington Sept ember 1942 J • ·' NATIONAL ADVISORY CO MMITTEE FOR AERO NAUTICS TECHNICAL NOTE NO. 861 THE EFFECT OF VALVE COOLING UPON MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE ENGINE OUTPUT AS LIMITED BY KNOCK By Maurice Mun g er. H. D. Wi1sted, and B. A. Mulcahy SUMMARY A Wri g ht GR-1820-G200 cylinder was tested over a wide r ange of fUel-air ratios at maximum permissible p ower o u t put as limited by knock with three different deg rees of valve cooling . The valves used were stock valves (solid i n let valve and hollow sodium-cooled ex­ h a u s t v a lve), hollo valves with n o coolant, and hollow valves with flo wing wat e r as a coolant. Curves s h owing t he variat i on in ma x i mu m p e r missi1 1 e v a lues of inlet­ air p r e ssu r e , i nd icated mean e f f e c t iv e p r e ssu re, cylin­ d e r c har g e, and indicat e d specific fu e l co n s umption wit h c hang e in fuel- a ir r a tio and val v e cooling are s h own .
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Piston Engine Operation Principles and Theory
    Lect-25 Aircraft Piston Engine Operation Principles and Theory 1 Prof. Bhaskar Roy, Prof. A M Pradeep, Department of Aerospace, IIT Bombay Lect-25 How an IC engine operates-1 • Each piston is inside a cylinder, into which a gas is created -- heated inside the cylinder by ignition of a fuel air mixture at high pressure (internal combustion engine). • The hot, high pressure gases expand, pushing the piston to the bottom of the cylinder (BDC) creating Power stroke. 2 Prof. Bhaskar Roy, Prof. A M Pradeep, Department of Aerospace, IIT Bombay Lect-25 How an IC engine operates-2 •The piston is returned to the cylinder top (Top Dead Centre) either by a flywheel or the power from other pistons connected to the same shaft. • In most types the "exhausted" gases are removed from the cylinder by this stroke. • This completes the four strokes of a 4-stroke engine also representing 4 legs of a cycle 3 Prof. Bhaskar Roy, Prof. A M Pradeep, Department of Aerospace, IIT Bombay Lect-25 How an IC engine operates-3 • The linear motion of the piston is converted to a rotational motion via a connecting rod and a crankshaft. • A flywheel is used to ensure continued smooth rotation (i.e. when there is no power stroke). Multiple cylinder power strokes act as a flywheel. 4 Prof. Bhaskar Roy, Prof. A M Pradeep, Department of Aerospace, IIT Bombay Lect-25 How an IC engine operates-4 •The more cylinders a reciprocating engine has, generally, the more vibration-free (smoothly) it can operate. •The aggregate power of a reciprocating engine is proportional to the volume of the combined pistons' displacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol Fuels for Spark-Ignition Engines
    Special issue article Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2018, Vol. 232(1) 36–56 Alcohol fuels for spark-ignition engines: Ó IMechE 2018 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav Performance, efficiency and emission DOI: 10.1177/0954407017752832 effects at mid to high blend rates for journals.sagepub.com/home/pid binary mixtures and pure components James WG Turner1, Andrew GJ Lewis1, Sam Akehurst1,ChrisJBrace1, Sebastian Verhelst2 , Jeroen Vancoillie2, Louis Sileghem2, Felix Leach3 and Peter P Edwards3 Abstract The paper evaluates the results of tests performed using mid- and high-level blends of the low-carbon alcohols, methanol and ethanol, in admixture with gasoline, conducted in a variety of test engines to investigate octane response, efficiency and exhaust emissions, including those for particulate matter. In addition, pure alcohols are tested in two of the engines, to show the maximum response that can be expected in terms of knock limit and efficiency as a result of the beneficial properties of the two alcohols investigated. All of the test work has been conducted with blending of the alcohols and gasoline taking place outside the combustion system, that is, the two components are mixed homogeneously before introduction to the fuel system, and so the results represent what would happen if the alcohols were introduced into the fuel pool through a conventional single-fuel-pump (dispenser) approach. While much has been written on the effect of blending the light alcohols with gasoline in this way, the results present significant new findings with regard to the effect of the enthalpy of vaporization of the alcohols in terms of particulate exhaust emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Spark Advance and Fuel on Knocking Tendency of Spark Ignited Engine
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports 2017 Effect of spark advance and fuel on knocking tendency of spark ignited engine Abhay S. Joshi Michigan Technological University, [email protected] Copyright 2017 Abhay S. Joshi Recommended Citation Joshi, Abhay S., "Effect of spark advance and fuel on knocking tendency of spark ignited engine", Open Access Master's Report, Michigan Technological University, 2017. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/511 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etdr Part of the Automotive Engineering Commons, and the Heat Transfer, Combustion Commons EFFECT OF SPARK ADVANCE AND FUEL ON KNOCKING TENDENCY OF SPARK IGNITED ENGINE By Abhay S Joshi A REPORT Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In Mechanical Engineering MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2017 © 2017 Abhay S Joshi This report has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Mechanical Engineering. Department of Mechanical Engineering – Engineering Mechanics Report Advisor: Dr. Scott A. Miers Committee Member: Mr. Jeremy J. Worm Committee Member: Dr. David D. Wanless Department Chair: Dr. William W. Predebon ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I will like to thank Dr. Scott Miers for the encouragement, support and guidance during the entire duration of this study. I will like to thank my committee member Prof. Worm and Dr. Wanless for taking the time out of their schedule to review my report. I will also like to thank Behdad Afkhami for helping and guiding me whenever needed. Also, an acknowledgment is given to the support of this study from the faculty and staff of the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Mechanics for their support.
    [Show full text]