Artificial Intelligence for the Prediction of Exhaust Back Pressure Effect On
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Diesel and Fuel-Oil Engines
HdiiUiiat uuioTAt* VI i nPicrence moK not to do AUG 2 ^ : , CuKCH JlUili lilO L, iDi slil CS102E-42 Jf' Engines, Diese! and fuei-oil (export classifications) U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE JESSE H. JONES, Secretary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS LYMAN J. BRIGGS, Director DIESEL AND FUEL-OIL ENGINES (Export Classifications) COMMERCIAL STANDARD CS102E-42 Effective Date for New Production from October 30, 1942 A RECORDED VOLUNTARY STANDARD OF THE TRADE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1942 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 10 cents . U. S. Department of Commerce National Bureau of Standard? PROMULGATION of COMMERCIAL STANDARD CS102E-42 for DIESEL AND FUEL-OIL ENGINES (Export Classifications) On January 30, 1942, at the instance of the Diesel Engine Manu- facturers’ Association, a conference of representative manufacturers adopted a recommended commercial standard for Diesel and fuel -oil engines (export classifications). Those concerned have since accepted and approved the standard as shown herein for promulgation by the U. S. Department of Commerce, through the National Bureau of Standards. The standard is effective for new production from October 30, 1942. Promulgation recommended I. J. Fairchild, Chieff Division of Trade Standards, Promulgated. Lyman J. Briggs, Director^ National Bureau of Standards, Promulgation approved. Jesse H. Jones, Secretary of Commerce. II DIESEL AND FUEL-OIL ENGINES (Export Classifications) COMMERCIAL STANDARD CS102E-42 PARTS Page 1. Nomenclature and definitions.. ' 1 2. Slow- and medium-speed stationary Diesel engines 7 3. Slow- and medium-speed marine Diesel engines 13 4. Small, medium- and high-speed stationary, marine, and portable Diesel engines 19 5. -
! National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics
! . \ i NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS TECHNICAL NOTE No. 1374 EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE KNOCK - LIlvITTED BLENDIDG CHARACTERISTICS OF AVIATION FUELS II - INVESTIGATION OF LEADED PARAFFINIC FUELS IN AN AIR-COOLED CYLrnDER By Jerrold D. Wear and Newell D. Sanders Flight Propulsion Research Laboratory Cleveland, Ohio Washington July 1947 , \ I NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS TN 1374 EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE KNOCK-LIMITED BLENDING CH.~~ACTERISTICS OF AVIATION FUELS II - INVESTIGATION OF LEADED PARAFFINIC FUELS IN ~~ AIR-COOLED CYLINDER By Jerrold D. Wear and. Newell D. Sanders SUMMARY The relation between knock limit and blend composition of selected aviation fuel components individually blended with virgin base and ''lith alkylate was determined in a full-scale air-cooled aircraft-·engine cylinder. In addition the follow ing correlations were examined: (a) The knock-·limited performance of a full -scale engine at lean-mixture operation plotted against the knock-limited perform ance of the engine at rich-mixture operation for a series of fuels (b) The knock-limited performance of a full-scale engine at rich-mixture operation plotted against the knock-limited perform ance at rich-mixture operation of a small-scale engine for a series of fuels In each case the following methods of specifying the knock limi ted perfOl'IDanCe of the engine were investigated: (l) Knock·-limited indicated mean effective pressure (2) percentage of S-4 plus 4 ml T~~ per gallon in M-4 plus 4 ml TEL per gallon to give an equal knock-limited indicated mean effective pressure (3) Ratio of indicated mean effective pressure of test fuel ~o indicated mean effective pressure of clear S-4 reference fuel, all other conditions being the same . -
An Experimental Study on Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Hydrogen Fuelled Spark Ignition Engine
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DSpace@IZTECH Institutional Repository International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 32 (2007) 2066–2072 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhydene An experimental study on performance and emission characteristics of a hydrogen fuelled spark ignition engine Erol Kahramana, S. Cihangir Ozcanlıb, Baris Ozerdemb,∗ aProgram of Energy Engineering, Izmir Institute of Technology, Urla, Izmir 35430, Turkey bDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Izmir Institute of Technology, Urla, Izmir 35430, Turkey Received 2 August 2006; accepted 2 August 2006 Available online 2 October 2006 Abstract In the present paper, the performance and emission characteristics of a conventional four cylinder spark ignition (SI) engine operated on hydrogen and gasoline are investigated experimentally. The compressed hydrogen at 20 MPa has been introduced to the engine adopted to operate on gaseous hydrogen by external mixing. Two regulators have been used to drop the pressure first to 300 kPa, then to atmospheric pressure. The variations of torque, power, brake thermal efficiency, brake mean effective pressure, exhaust gas temperature, and emissions of NOx, CO, CO2, HC, and O2 versus engine speed are compared for a carbureted SI engine operating on gasoline and hydrogen. Energy analysis also has studied for comparison purpose. The test results have been demonstrated that power loss occurs at low speed hydrogen operation whereas high speed characteristics compete well with gasoline operation. Fast burning characteristics of hydrogen have permitted high speed engine operation. Less heat loss has occurred for hydrogen than gasoline. NOx emission of hydrogen fuelled engine is about 10 times lower than gasoline fuelled engine. -
Towards a Fully Automated Extraction and Interpretation of Tabular Data Using Machine Learning
UPTEC F 19050 Examensarbete 30 hp August 2019 Towards a fully automated extraction and interpretation of tabular data using machine learning Per Hedbrant Per Hedbrant Master Thesis in Engineering Physics Department of Engineering Sciences Uppsala University Sweden Abstract Towards a fully automated extraction and interpretation of tabular data using machine learning Per Hedbrant Teknisk- naturvetenskaplig fakultet UTH-enheten Motivation A challenge for researchers at CBCS is the ability to efficiently manage the Besöksadress: different data formats that frequently are changed. Significant amount of time is Ångströmlaboratoriet Lägerhyddsvägen 1 spent on manual pre-processing, converting from one format to another. There are Hus 4, Plan 0 currently no solutions that uses pattern recognition to locate and automatically recognise data structures in a spreadsheet. Postadress: Box 536 751 21 Uppsala Problem Definition The desired solution is to build a self-learning Software as-a-Service (SaaS) for Telefon: automated recognition and loading of data stored in arbitrary formats. The aim of 018 – 471 30 03 this study is three-folded: A) Investigate if unsupervised machine learning Telefax: methods can be used to label different types of cells in spreadsheets. B) 018 – 471 30 00 Investigate if a hypothesis-generating algorithm can be used to label different types of cells in spreadsheets. C) Advise on choices of architecture and Hemsida: technologies for the SaaS solution. http://www.teknat.uu.se/student Method A pre-processing framework is built that can read and pre-process any type of spreadsheet into a feature matrix. Different datasets are read and clustered. An investigation on the usefulness of reducing the dimensionality is also done. -
Advanced Data Mining with Weka (Class 5)
Advanced Data Mining with Weka Class 5 – Lesson 1 Invoking Python from Weka Peter Reutemann Department of Computer Science University of Waikato New Zealand weka.waikato.ac.nz Lesson 5.1: Invoking Python from Weka Class 1 Time series forecasting Lesson 5.1 Invoking Python from Weka Class 2 Data stream mining Lesson 5.2 Building models in Weka and MOA Lesson 5.3 Visualization Class 3 Interfacing to R and other data mining packages Lesson 5.4 Invoking Weka from Python Class 4 Distributed processing with Apache Spark Lesson 5.5 A challenge, and some Groovy Class 5 Scripting Weka in Python Lesson 5.6 Course summary Lesson 5.1: Invoking Python from Weka Scripting Pros script captures preprocessing, modeling, evaluation, etc. write script once, run multiple times easy to create variants to test theories no compilation involved like with Java Cons programming involved need to familiarize yourself with APIs of libraries writing code is slower than clicking in the GUI Invoking Python from Weka Scripting languages Jython - https://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/ - pure-Java implementation of Python 2.7 - runs in JVM - access to all Java libraries on CLASSPATH - only pure-Python libraries can be used Python - invoking Weka from Python 2.7 - access to full Python library ecosystem Groovy (briefly) - http://www.groovy-lang.org/documentation.html - Java-like syntax - runs in JVM - access to all Java libraries on CLASSPATH Invoking Python from Weka Java vs Python Java Output public class Blah { 1: Hello WekaMOOC! public static void main(String[] -
Introduction to Weka
Introduction to Weka Overview What is Weka? Where to find Weka? Command Line Vs GUI Datasets in Weka ARFF Files Classifiers in Weka Filters What is Weka? Weka is a collection of machine learning algorithms for data mining tasks. The algorithms can either be applied directly to a dataset or called from your own Java code. Weka contains tools for data pre-processing, classification, regression, clustering, association rules, and visualization. It is also well-suited for developing new machine learning schemes. Where to find Weka Weka website (Latest version 3.6): – http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/ Weka Manual: − http://transact.dl.sourceforge.net/sourcefor ge/weka/WekaManual-3.6.0.pdf CLI Vs GUI Recommended for in-depth usage Explorer Offers some functionality not Experimenter available via the GUI Knowledge Flow Datasets in Weka Each entry in a dataset is an instance of the java class: − weka.core.Instance Each instance consists of a number of attributes Attributes Nominal: one of a predefined list of values − e.g. red, green, blue Numeric: A real or integer number String: Enclosed in “double quotes” Date Relational ARFF Files The external representation of an Instances class Consists of: − A header: Describes the attribute types − Data section: Comma separated list of data ARFF File Example Dataset name Comment Attributes Target / Class variable Data Values Assignment ARFF Files Credit-g Heart-c Hepatitis Vowel Zoo http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pat/weka/ ARFF Files Basic statistics and validation by running: − java weka.core.Instances data/soybean.arff Classifiers in Weka Learning algorithms in Weka are derived from the abstract class: − weka.classifiers.Classifier Simple classifier: ZeroR − Just determines the most common class − Or the median (in the case of numeric values) − Tests how well the class can be predicted without considering other attributes − Can be used as a Lower Bound on Performance. -
Mathematica Document
Mathematica Project: Exploratory Data Analysis on ‘Data Scientists’ A big picture view of the state of data scientists and machine learning engineers. ����� ���� ��������� ��� ������ ���� ������ ������ ���� ������/ ������ � ���������� ���� ��� ������ ��� ���������������� �������� ������/ ����� ��������� ��� ���� ���������������� ����� ��������������� ��������� � ������(�������� ���������� ���������) ������ ��������� ����� ������� �������� ����� ������� ��� ������ ����������(���� �������) ��������� ����� ���� ������ ����� (���������� �������) ����������(���������� ������� ���������� ��� ���� ���� �����/ ��� �������������� � ����� ���� �� �������� � ��� ����/���������� ��������������� ������� ������������� ��� ���������� ����� �����(���� �������) ����������� ����� / ����� ��� ������ ��������������� ���������� ����������/�++ ������/������������/����/������ ���� ������� ����� ������� ������� ����������������� ������� ������� ����/����/�������/��/��� ����������(�����/����-�������� ��������) ������������ In this Mathematica project, we will explore the capabilities of Mathematica to better understand the state of data science enthusiasts. The dataset consisting of more than 10,000 rows is obtained from Kaggle, which is a result of ‘Kaggle Survey 2017’. We will explore various capabilities of Mathematica in Data Analysis and Data Visualizations. Further, we will utilize Machine Learning techniques to train models and Classify features with several algorithms, such as Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest. Dataset : https : // www.kaggle.com/kaggle/kaggle -
WEKA: the Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis
WEKA: The Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis Stephen R. Garner Department of Computer Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton. ABSTRACT WEKA is a workbench designed to aid in the application of machine learning technology to real world data sets, in particular, data sets from New Zealand’s agricultural sector. In order to do this a range of machine learning techniques are presented to the user in such a way as to hide the idiosyncrasies of input and output formats, as well as allow an exploratory approach in applying the technology. The system presented is a component based one that also has application in machine learning research and education. 1. Introduction The WEKA machine learning workbench has grown out of the need to be able to apply machine learning to real world data sets in a way that promotes a “what if?…” or exploratory approach. Each machine learning algorithm implementation requires the data to be present in its own format, and has its own way of specifying parameters and output. The WEKA system was designed to bring a range of machine learning techniques or schemes under a common interface so that they may be easily applied to this data in a consistent method. This interface should be flexible enough to encourage the addition of new schemes, and simple enough that users need only concern themselves with the selection of features in the data for analysis and what the output means, rather than how to use a machine learning scheme. The WEKA system has been used over the past year to work with a variety of agricultural data sets in order to try to answer a range of questions. -
Statistical Software
Statistical Software A. Grant Schissler1;2;∗ Hung Nguyen1;3 Tin Nguyen1;3 Juli Petereit1;4 Vincent Gardeux5 Keywords: statistical software, open source, Big Data, visualization, parallel computing, machine learning, Bayesian modeling Abstract Abstract: This article discusses selected statistical software, aiming to help readers find the right tool for their needs. We categorize software into three classes: Statisti- cal Packages, Analysis Packages with Statistical Libraries, and General Programming Languages with Statistical Libraries. Statistical and analysis packages often provide interactive, easy-to-use workflows while general programming languages are built for speed and optimization. We emphasize each software's defining characteristics and discuss trends in popularity. The concluding sections muse on the future of statistical software including the impact of Big Data and the advantages of open-source languages. This article discusses selected statistical software, aiming to help readers find the right tool for their needs (not provide an exhaustive list). Also, we acknowledge our experiences bias the discussion towards software employed in scholarly work. Throughout, we emphasize the software's capacity to analyze large, complex data sets (\Big Data"). The concluding sections muse on the future of statistical software. To aid in the discussion, we classify software into three groups: (1) Statistical Packages, (2) Analysis Packages with Statistical Libraries, and (3) General Programming Languages with Statistical Libraries. This structure -
MLJ: a Julia Package for Composable Machine Learning
MLJ: A Julia package for composable machine learning Anthony D. Blaom1, 2, 3, Franz Kiraly3, 4, Thibaut Lienart3, Yiannis Simillides7, Diego Arenas6, and Sebastian J. Vollmer3, 5 1 University of Auckland, New Zealand 2 New Zealand eScience Infrastructure, New Zealand 3 Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom 4 University College London, United Kingdom 5 University of Warwick, United Kingdom 6 University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom 7 Imperial College London, United Kingdom DOI: 10.21105/joss.02704 Software • Review Introduction • Repository • Archive Statistical modeling, and the building of complex modeling pipelines, is a cornerstone of modern data science. Most experienced data scientists rely on high-level open source modeling Editor: Yuan Tang toolboxes - such as sckit-learn (Buitinck et al., 2013; Pedregosa et al., 2011) (Python); Weka (Holmes et al., 1994) (Java); mlr (Bischl et al., 2016) and caret (Kuhn, 2008) (R) - for quick Reviewers: blueprinting, testing, and creation of deployment-ready models. They do this by providing a • @degleris1 common interface to atomic components, from an ever-growing model zoo, and by providing • @henrykironde the means to incorporate these into complex work-flows. Practitioners are wanting to build increasingly sophisticated composite models, as exemplified in the strategies of top contestants Submitted: 21 July 2020 in machine learning competitions such as Kaggle. Published: 07 November 2020 MLJ (Machine Learning in Julia) (A. Blaom, 2020b) is a toolbox written in Julia that pro- License Authors of papers retain vides a common interface and meta-algorithms for selecting, tuning, evaluating, composing copyright and release the work and comparing machine model implementations written in Julia and other languages. -
Napier Sabre Engines Will Be Found on Page L75
STAITDARDIZRD DATA PAGES FOR RECIPROCATIITG EITCTI\ES Standardized data pages are used to present the specifieations of the basic aircraft engines and airhorne auxiliary units described and illustrated in the followirg section of the book. The arrangeme'nt of the data on the standardi zed" data pages is as f ollows : First, there is a concise description of the engine, its construe tion and the major accessories with which it is equipped. Then, in tabular form, there are items such as bore, stroke, displacement (swept vol- ume), compression ratio, overall dimensions, frontal areae total weight and weight per maximum horsepolyer. F'uel and lubricating oiX eonsumptions at cruising output are given in units of weight. The fuel grade and the viscosity of the lubricating oil at 210o F" (100o C) also are specified. Efficiency figures such as maximum power output per unit of dis- placement, maximum polver output per unit of piston area) maximum piston speed and maximum brake mean effective pressure have been ealculated for comparative purposes. Finally, the various horsepower ratings of the engine are given, such as; Take-off rating, or the maxinrum horsepower which it is per- missibil to ,ruJ at sea level and at low altitrdes. flrlilitary (combat) rating, or the maximum horsepower which it is perrnissib]e to use for military purposes at various alti- tudes. fVorrual rating,, or the ntaximum horsepower which the engine can deliver continuously for climh without undue stress" Cruising ratirug, or the maximum horsepo\,ver recommended for continuous operation consistent with reasonable fuel econ- omy. Ern,ergerlcy rating, or the marximum horsepower which it is permissible use a _ to for short period of time in an ernergency. -
A Formal Methodology for the Comparison of Results from Different Software Packages
A formal methodology for the comparison of results from different software packages Alexander Zlotnik Department of Electronic Engineering. Technical University of Madrid. & Ramón y Cajal University Hospital Structure of Presentation Why? Is the output really different? Is the algorithm documented? Closed source vs open source An example Summary Multi-core performance Why? Multidisciplinary and multi-location research is becoming the norm for high-impact scientific publications. Sometimes one part of your team uses one software package (R, Python, MATLAB, Mathematica, etc) and the other part uses a different one (Stata, SAS, SPSS, etc). After a lot of frustrating testing, you realize that you are getting different results with the same operations and the same datasets. Why? In other situations, you simply want to develop your own functionality for an existing software package or a full independent software package with some statistical functionality. Since you know Stata well, you decide to compare the output of your program with the one from Stata and guess what …? Source: elance.com This seems doable, but there are likely to be many hidden surprises when comparing results for both implementationsc Structure of Presentation Why? Is the output really different? Is the algorithm documented? Are the same numerical methods used? Closed source vs open source An example Summary Multi-core performance Is the output really different? Are you using the same dataset? Is the data converted in the same way? Are there any issues with numerical precision? Is the output really different? Are you using the same dataset? Sometimes someone changes the dataset but doesn’t rename it.