DOCSLIB.ORG

St. Louis County Arterial Road System (Ars)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
St. Louis County Arterial Road System (Ars) ARS Establishment Date: January 1, 1972 Latest ARS Revision: November 25, 2019 ST. LOUIS COUNTY ARTERIAL ROAD SYSTEM (ARS) St. Louis County Department of Transportation 1050 North Lindbergh Boulevard Creve Coeur, Missouri 63132 www.stlouisco.com/YourGovernment/CountyDepartments/HighwaysandTraffic/HighwayPublicationsManuals ST. LOUIS COUNTY ARTERIAL ROAD SYSTEM (ARS) Page 2 of 15 Maint. Map Council Inc. Uninc. Total Last Road Limits District Page District Municipality Mileage Mileage Mileage Revision ADAMS AVENUE Ballas Road (E) to the City Limits of 4 281-B4 5 Kirkwood 2.78 0.00 2.78 9/1/1972 Glendale at Holmes Avenue ADIE ROAD Dorsett Road (SW) to Schaefer Drive 2 132-F3 2 Maryland Heights 0.06 0.00 0.06 4/29/1999 AIRPORT ROAD James S. Mc Donnell Boulevard (E) to North 1 96-B3 1, 2, 4 Berkeley, Ferguson 2.25 0.00 2.25 6/9/1972 Florissant Road (Note: Part of Airport Road is divided) AMELING ROAD Bennington Place (E) to McKelvey Road 2 118-D3 3 Maryland Heights 0.24 0.00 0.24 5/9/1985 ASHBY ROAD Warson Road (N) to 181' (N) of 2 145-E4 1, 2, 3 Olivette 0.11 1.87 1.98 1/31/2013 Clarendon Avenue ATHLETIC DRIVE Rider Trail - South (NE & NW) to 2 78-C3 2 - - - - 0.00 0.31 0.31 11/25/2019 Lakefront Drive AUBUCHON ROAD Missouri Bottom Road (NE) to 1 51-E1 2 Bridgeton, Hazelwood 2.28 0.00 2.28 6/7/1995 Charbonier Road BALLAS ROAD Adams Avenue (W & N) to Country Aire Drive 4, 2 280-F3 5, 7, 3 Kirkwood, Des Peres, 3.93 0.00 3.93 7/15/2012 (located south of Interstate 64) Town & Country BAPTIST CHURCH ROAD Tesson Ferry Road (Route 21) (N) to 4 356-F2 6 - - - - 0.00 1.54 1.54 5/31/1990 Gravois Road (Route 30) BARRETT PARKWAY DRIVE Manchester Road (Route 100) (S & E) 3 262-D4 3 - - - - 0.00 0.18 0.18 2/9/2005 to Barrett Station Road BARRETT PARKWAY DRIVE Barrett Station Road (E & S) to 2 262-E3 3 Des Peres 0.19 0.00 0.19 12/17/1992 NORTH Manchester Road (Route 100) BARRETT STATION ROAD Dougherty Ferry Road (N) to Barrett 2, 3 279-F3 3 - - - - 0.00 1.44 1.44 5/5/1995 Parkway Drive North BAUMGARTNER ROAD Lemay Ferry Road (U. S. Route 61 & 67) 5 433-C2 6 - - - - 0.00 3.29 3.29 7/26/1983 (E) to Telegraph Road (Route 231) BAUR BOULEVARD Lindbergh Boulevard (U. S. Route 67) 2 161-C2 1, 3 Creve Coeur, Olivette 0.53 0.03 0.56 6/15/1990 (E) to Ashby Road BAXTER ROAD Manchester Road (Route 100) (NW, N & NE) 3 224-F3 3, 7 Manchester, Ballwin, 6.81 0.00 6.81 7/15/1999 to Chesterfield Airport Road Chesterfield List Revised: November 25, 2019 ST. LOUIS COUNTY ARTERIAL ROAD SYSTEM (ARS) Page 3 of 15 Maint. Map Council Inc. Uninc. Total Last Road Limits District Page District Municipality Mileage Mileage Mileage Revision BAYLESS AVENUE Union Road (SE) to Lemay Ferry Road 4 340-F3 6 Bella Villa 0.20 0.72 0.92 6/9/1972 (Route 267) BEECHCRAFT AVENUE Edison Avenue (S) thru turnaround 3 168-F4 7 Chesterfield 0.11 0.00 0.11 6/1/1988 BELL AVENUE Edison Avenue (S) thru turnaround 3 169-A4 7 Chesterfield 0.09 0.00 0.09 6/1/1988 BELLEFONTAINE ROAD City Limits of St. Louis (N) to Interstate 270 1 100-B3 4 Bellefontaine Neighbors 2.93 0.00 2.93 5/5/1995 BELLEFONTAINE ROAD Interstate 270 (N) to Parker Road 1 73-C2 4 - - - - 0.00 1.68 1.68 5/5/1995 BENNINGTON PLACE Fee Fee Road (N) to Marine Avenue 2 143-A2 3 Maryland Heights 0.78 0.13 0.91 5/4/2004 BENNINGTON PLACE Mc Kelvey Road (N) to Ameling Road 2 118-C4 3 Maryland Heights 0.34 0.00 0.34 5/9/1985 BERMUDA DRIVE Florissant Road (Route N) (N) to Paul Avenue 1 124-D3 1 Ferguson, Normandy 2.30 0.00 2.30 12/1/1972 BERRY ROAD Big Bend Boulevard (N) to Manchester Road 4 283-C3 5 Glendale 1.58 0.54 2.12 6/9/1972 (Route 100) BIG BEND BOULEVARD Delmar Boulevard (S & SW) to Berry Road 2, 4 233-D3 5 University City, Clayton, 7.29 0.00 7.29 9/19/1982 Richmond Heights, Maplewood Shrewsbury, Webster Groves BIG BEND ROAD Berry Road (SW & W) to New Ballwin Road 4, 3 299-B4 5, 3, 7 Kirkwood, Valley Park, Twin 8.20 1.76 9.96 12/5/2003 Oaks, Manchester, Ballwin BLAND DRIVE Forest Park Parkway off-ramp (NE) to 2 215-B1 3 University City 0.04 0.00 0.04 4/14/1997 Forsyth Boulevard (Bland is a one-way street) BOWLES AVENUE Hawkins Road (N, E & N) to South Highway 4 371-E1 3 Fenton 1.36 1.54 2.90 4/13/2005 Drive (the south service road of Interstate 44) BRENTWOOD BOULEVARD City Limits of Webster Groves at 2, 4 232-C4 5 Brentwood, Richmond Heights 2.34 0.00 2.34 10/27/1995 Marshall Avenue (N) to Clayton Road BROWN ROAD Woodson Road (N) to Natural Bridge Road 2 147-A3 2 Berkeley, St. John, Overland 3.11 0.00 3.11 6/9/1972 (Route 115) Sycamore Hills List Revised: November 25, 2019 ST. LOUIS COUNTY ARTERIAL ROAD SYSTEM (ARS) Page 4 of 15 Maint. Map Council Inc. Uninc. Total Last Road Limits District Page District Municipality Mileage Mileage Mileage Revision BUTLER HILL ROAD Tesson Ferry Road (Route 21) (SE & E) 5 407-D3 6 - - - - 0.00 1.72 1.72 8/29/2001 to Lemay Ferry Road (U.S. Rte. 61 & 67) BUZZ WESTFALL DRIVE Wings Corporate Drive (S) to the end of 3 184-A2 7 Chesterfield 0.13 0.00 0.13 12/22/2009 Maintenance (65' south of Paul Haglin Drive) CAMPUS PARKWAY Missouri Bottom Road (NE) to James S. 1 66-F4 2 Hazelwood 0.63 0.00 0.63 6/7/1995 McDonnell Boulevard CARMAN ROAD Meramec Station Road (Route 141) 3 296-D1 7 Manchester 1.93 0.00 1.93 10/7/1999 (E & SE) to Dougherty Ferry Road CHAIN OF ROCKS DRIVE Bellefontaine Road (E) to the City Limits of 1 127-A1 4 Bellefontaine Neighbors 0.28 0.00 0.28 9/1/1972 St. Louis CHAMBERS ROAD Elizabeth Avenue (E) to Lewis and Clark 1 97-E3 1, 4 Ferguson, Dellwood, 1.95 1.41 3.36 6/9/1972 Boulevard (Route 367) Moline Acres CHAMBERS ROAD Lewis and Clark Boulevard (Route 367) (E) 1 99-E3 1, 4 Moline Acres, Bellefontaine 2.15 0.00 2.15 6/9/1972 to the City Limits of St. Louis Neighbors, Riverview CHARBONIER ROAD Lindbergh Boulevard (U. S. Route 67) 1 40-B3 2 Florissant, Hazelwood 3.89 0.00 3.89 10/1/1997 (NW & SW) to Aubuchon Road CHESTERFIELD AIRPORT ROAD 1900' (NW) of Olive Street Road (SE, E & SE) 3 170-C3 7 Chesterfield 4.23 0.00 4.23 9/1/2008 to Baxter Road at the I-64 Eastbound On-Ramp CHESTERFIELD PARKWAY EAST Olive Boulevard (State Route 340) (SE & 2, 3 188-E3 3 Chesterfield 1.12 0.00 1.12 1/7/1999 SW) to Clarkson Road (State Route 340) CHESTERFIELD PARKWAY WEST Clarkson Road (State Route 340) (NW, 2, 3 188-A3 3 Chesterfield 1.96 0.00 1.96 1/7/1999 NE & SE) to Olive Boulevard (Route 340) CLAYTON ROAD Eatherton Road (Route 109) (E & NE) to 3 257-A2 7, 3 Wildwood, Ellisville, Ballwin, 7.62 0.00 7.62 7/15/2012 South Woods Mill Road Chesterfield, Town & Country CLAYTON ROAD Lay Road (E) to the City Limits of St. Louis 2 215-A4 3, 5 Clayton, Richmond Heights 2.78 0.00 2.78 11/9/1973 (excluding the north half of Clayton Road between Lay Road and Louwen Drive, which is maintained by the City of Ladue) CONWAY ROAD Chesterfield Parkway East (E) to the east line 2 189-B4 3 Chesterfield, Town & Country 3.96 0.00 3.96 1/7/1999 of Mason Road List Revised: November 25, 2019 ST. LOUIS COUNTY ARTERIAL ROAD SYSTEM (ARS) Page 5 of 15 Maint. Map Council Inc. Uninc. Total Last Road Limits District Page District Municipality Mileage Mileage Mileage Revision CRAIG ROAD Olive Boulevard (Route 340) (N) to 2 159-E2 3 Creve Coeur, Maryland Heights 0.46 1.54 2.00 4/4/1996 Lackland Road CREVE COEUR MILL ROAD Olive Boulevard (Route 340) (NW) to 2 157-F1 2, 3 Maryland Heights 0.22 0.73 0.95 1/23/2009 Waterworks Road CREVE COEUR MILL ROAD Prichard Farm Road (NE) to McKelvey Road 2 105-D2 2 Maryland Heights 1.31 0.00 1.31 3/30/2005 CYPRESS ROAD St. Charles Rock Road (Route 180) (NE) to 2 107-F3 2 St. Ann, Bridgeton 0.75 0.00 0.75 12/1/1972 Interstate 70 DELMAR BOULEVARD Price Road (E) to Interstate 170 2 195-F1 3 Olivette, University City 0.51 0.00 0.51 6/9/1972 DELMAR BOULEVARD 205 feet (E) McKnight Road, (E) to the eastern 2 196-D1 5 University City 2.33 0.00 2.33 11/1/2013 right-of-way line of Big Bend Boulevard DIELMAN ROAD Olive Boulevard (Route 340) (N) to 2 162-C2 1, 3 Olivette, Overland 0.80 0.20 1.00 6/9/1972 Page Avenue (Route D) DORSETT ROAD Marine Avenue (NE & E) to Interstate 270 2 131-C1 2, 3 Maryland Heights 1.41 0.00 1.41 5/9/1985 DORSETT ROAD Interstate 270 (E & SE) to Lindbergh 2 132-D1 2 Maryland Heights 2.05 0.00 2.05 4/29/1999 Boulevard (U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Roundabout Planning, Design, and Operations Manual
    Roundabout Planning, Design, and Operations Manual December 2015 Alabama Department of Transportation ROUNDABOUT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND OPERATIONS MANUAL December 2015 Prepared by: The University Transportation Center for of Alabama Steven L. Jones, Ph.D. Abdulai Abdul Majeed Steering Committee Tim Barnett, P.E., ALDOT Office of Safety Operations Stuart Manson, P.E., ALDOT Office of Safety Operations Sonya Baker, ALDOT Office of Safety Operations Stacey Glass, P.E., ALDOT Maintenance Stan Biddick, ALDOT Design Bryan Fair, ALDOT Planning Steve Walker, P.E., ALDOT R.O.W. Vince Calametti, P.E., ALDOT 9th Division James Brown, P.E., ALDOT 2nd Division James Foster, P.E., Mobile County Clint Andrews, Federal Highway Administration Blair Perry, P.E., Gresham Smith & Partners Howard McCulloch, P.E., NE Roundabouts DISCLAIMER This manual provides guidelines and recommended practices for planning and designing roundabouts in the State of Alabama. This manual cannot address or anticipate all possible field conditions that will affect a roundabout design. It remains the ultimate responsibility of the design engineer to ensure that a design is appropriate for prevailing traffic and field conditions. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1.1. Purpose ...................................................................................................... 1-5 1.2. Scope and Organization ............................................................................... 1-7 1.3. Limitations ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Continuous Flow Intersection, Parallel Flow Intersection, and Upstream Signalized Crossover
    Comparison of Three Unconventional Arterial Intersection Designs: Continuous Flow Intersection, Parallel Flow Intersection, and Upstream Signalized Crossover Seonyeong Cheong, Saed Rahwanji, and Gang-Len Chang Abstract— This research is aimed to evaluate and world have adopted many conventional measures, including compare the operational performance of three signal planning and double left-turn lanes, for alleviating this unconventional intersections: Continuous Flow problem [1]. The using of these conventional measures are Intersection (CFI), Parallel Flow Intersection (PFI) and limited as the modifications of intersection design, such as Upstream Signalized Crossover (USC). For this purpose, widening interchanges and building bypasses, are expensive various experimental designs, including traffic conditions, and disruptive [1]. In contrast, the unconventional arterial geometric features and signal plans, were set and the intersection design (UAID) is one of the methods that can average delays were compared for movements of efficiently reduce the congestion with less cost as compare through-only traffic and left-turn-only traffic. From the with the conventional measures. General principles of results of analysis, all three unconventional intersections operation and management strategies of the UAID include: 1) outperformed conventional one and among the emphasis on through traffic movements along the arterial; 2) unconventional intersections, CFI outperformed the reduction in the number of signal phases (e.g. left-turn arrow others except for some traffic conditions. In the balanced phase); and 3) reduction in the number of intersection conflict traffic condition scenario, at the low traffic volume level, points [2]. These principles allow the UAID to reduce the the average delays of through traffic for PFI were smaller traffic congestion at the intersection and improve the traffic than that of CFI and very similar at the moderate traffic safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Fire Services Study
    RegionalRegional FireFire ServicesServices StudyStudy CitiesCities of:of: ClaytonClayton MaplewoodMaplewood OlivetteOlivette RichmondRichmond HeightsHeights UniversityUniversity CityCity NovemberNovember 20092009 Regional Fire Services Study Cities of: Clayton Maplewood Olivette Richmond Heights University City Prepared by Phil Kouwe Kent Greene Martin Goughnour John Best Robert McNally Emergency Services Consulting International 25200 SW Parkway Ave. Suite 3 Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 800-757-3724 www.ESCI.us November 2009 Regional Fire Services Study Clayton, Maplewood, Olivette, Richmond Heights, University City Table of Contents Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................ v Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................1 Report Conventions ......................................................................................................................9 Emergency Services Survey ......................................................................................................9 RECOMMENDATIONS...................................................................................................................................9 Section 1: Emergency Services Agency Evaluations .................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide
    BIKEWAY SELECTION GUIDE FEBRUARY 2019 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED February 2019 Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. FUNDING NUMBERS Bikeway Selection Guide NA 6. AUTHORS 5b. CONTRACT NUMBER Schultheiss, Bill; Goodman, Dan; Blackburn, Lauren; DTFH61-16-D-00005 Wood, Adam; Reed, Dan; Elbech, Mary 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION VHB, 940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500 REPORT NUMBER Raleigh, NC 27606 NA Toole Design Group, 8484 Georgia Avenue, Suite 800 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Mobycon - North America, Durham, NC 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AND ADDRESS(ES) AGENCY REPORT NUMBER Tamara Redmon FHWA-SA-18-077 Project Manager, Office of Safety Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington DC 20590 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE This document is available to the public on the FHWA website at: NA https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike 13. ABSTRACT This document is a resource to help transportation practitioners consider and make informed decisions about trade- offs relating to the selection of bikeway types. This report highlights linkages between the bikeway selection process and the transportation planning process. This guide presents these factors and considerations in a practical process- oriented way. It draws on research where available and emphasizes engineering judgment, design flexibility, documentation, and experimentation. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES Bike, bicycle, bikeway, multimodal, networks, 52 active transportation, low stress networks 16. PRICE CODE NA 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Maricopa County Department of Transportation MAJOR STREETS and ROUTES PLAN Policy Document and Street Classification Atlas
    Maricopa County Department of Transportation MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES PLAN Policy Document and Street Classification Atlas Adopted April 18, 2001 Revised September 2004 Revised June 2011 Preface to 2011 Revision This version of the Major Streets and Routes Plan (MSRP) revises the original plan and the 2004 revisions. Looking ahead to pending updates to the classification systems of towns and cities in Maricopa County, the original MSRP stipulated a periodic review and modification of the street functional classification portion of the plan. This revision incorporates the following changes: (1) as anticipated, many of the communities in the County have updated either their general or transportation plans in the time since the adoption of the first MSRP; (2) a new roadway classification, the Arizona Parkway, has been added to the Maricopa County street classification system and the expressway classification has been removed; and (3) a series of regional framework studies have been conducted by the Maricopa Association of Governments to establish comprehensive roadway networks in parts of the West Valley. Table of Contents 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................1 2. Functional Classification Categorization.............................................................................1 3. Geometric Design Standards..............................................................................................4 4. Street Classification Atlas..................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure
    Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure Cover Photo: Rajendra Ravi, Institute for Democracy & Sustainability. Acknowledgements This Planning and Design guideline has been produced as part of the Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation (SSEF) sponsored project on Non-motorised Transport by the Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Programme at the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi. The project team at TRIPP, IIT Delhi, has worked closely with researchers from Innovative Transport Solutions (iTrans) Pvt. Ltd. and SGArchitects during the course of this project. We are thankful to all our project partners for detailed discussions on planning and design issues involving non-motorised transport: The Manual for Cycling Inclusive Urban Infrastructure Design in the Indian Subcontinent’ (2009) supported by Interface for Cycling Embassy under Bicycle Partnership Program which was funded by Sustainable Urban Mobility in Asia. The second document is Public Transport Accessibility Toolkit (2012) and the third one is the Urban Road Safety Audit (URSA) Toolkit supported by Institute of Urban Transport (IUT) provided the necessary background information for this document. We are thankful to Prof. Madhav Badami, Tom Godefrooij, Prof. Talat Munshi, Rajinder Ravi, Pradeep Sachdeva, Prasanna Desai, Ranjit Gadgil, Parth Shah and Dr. Girish Agrawal for reviewing an earlier version of this document and providing valuable comments. We thank all our colleagues at the Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Programme for cooperation provided during the course of this study. Finally we would like to thank the transport team at Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation (SSEF) for providing the necessary support required for the completion of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • South County Connector Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volume I Summary Chapters 1-6 St. Louis County, Missouri April 2013 FHWA-MO-EIS-13-01-D South County Connector Draft Environmental Impact Statement Summary St. Louis County, Missouri (County), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), has completed this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposed transportation improvement project, referred to as the South County Connector. The project location map is depicted in Figure 1. This EIS describes existing problems in the project area, discusses development of alternatives, examines potential impacts of the alternatives considered, and identifies potential mitigation measures for unavoidable impacts. A preferred alternative is the alternative that best meets the project purpose and need, balances the benefits and impacts of the project, and is responsive to public and agency comments. Therefore, the final selection of an alternative will not be made until after considering comments from other federal, state and local agencies and the public as a part of the Draft EIS reviews and public hearing process. The preferred alternative will be presented in the Final EIS. PROJECT HISTORY A plan for an improved connection from south St. Louis County to central St. Louis County has existed since the late 1950s. The original concept was for a freeway “inner belt expressway” to provide better north-south access through the St. Louis suburbs. This freeway concept resulted in Interstate 170, north of Interstate 64/U.S. Route 40. Originally, Interstate 170 was proposed to continue south into the southern part of St. Louis County to provide improved access between Interstates 44, 55, and 64.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Suspended Where Possible for July 4
    State of Illinois JB Pritzker, Governor Illinois Department of Transportation Omer Osman, Acting Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: July 1, 2020 Paul Wappel 217.685.0082 Maria Castaneda 312.447.1919 Construction suspended where possible for July 4 Non-emergency closures called off, but motorists should still expect work zones SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois Department of Transportation announced today that lanes that have been closed for construction will reopen, where possible, for the Fourth of July holiday to minimize travel disruption. Non-emergency closures will be suspended from 3 p.m. July 2 to 11:59 p.m. July 5. The following lane closures will remain in place during the holiday weekend. Work zone speed limits will remain in effect where posted. Please buckle up, put your phone down and drive sober. District 1 City of Chicago: • The following ramps in the Jane Byrne Interchange work zone will remain closed: • o Inbound Kennedy (Interstate 90/94) Expressway exit to inbound Ida B. Wells Drive. o Outbound Dan Ryan Expressway exit to Taylor Street and Roosevelt Road. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive entrance from Canal Street. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive exit to outbound Dan Ryan. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive exit to outbound Kennedy. o Inbound Eisenhower Expressway (Interstate -290) to outbound Kennedy; detour with U-turn posted. o Inbound Eisenhower; lane reductions continue. o Inbound Ida B. Wells Drive; lane reductions continue. • Outbound Kennedy exit at Canfield Road; closed. • Westbound Bryn Mawr Avenue between Harlem and Oriole avenues; lane reductions continue. • Westbound Higgins Avenue between Oriole and Canfield avenues; lane reductions continue.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Reso 1..2
    *LRB09621705GRL39304r* SJ0118 LRB096 21705 GRL 39304 r 1 SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION 2 WHEREAS, The Chicago - Kansas City Expressway (C-KC) 3 corridor through Illinois and Missouri forms a unified corridor 4 of commerce between 2 of the major commercial and tourism 5 centers in the Midwest; and 6 WHEREAS, The portion of the Chicago - Kansas City 7 Expressway corridor from Chicago to the Quad Cities, Galesburg, 8 Monmouth, Macomb, and Quincy, constitutes a major artery for 9 travel, commerce, and economic opportunity for a significant 10 portion of the State of Illinois; and 11 WHEREAS, It is appropriate that this highway corridor 12 through Illinois connecting to the corridor in the State of 13 Missouri be uniquely signed as the Chicago - Kansas City 14 Expressway (C-KC) to facilitate the movement of traffic; 15 therefore, be it 16 RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE OF THE NINETY-SIXTH GENERAL 17 ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 18 CONCURRING HEREIN, that we designate Interstate 88, the 19 portions of Interstate 55 and Interstate 80 from Chicago to the 20 Quad Cities, Interstate 74 to Galesburg, U.S. Route 34 to 21 Monmouth, U.S. Route 67 to Macomb, Illinois 336 to Interstate 22 172 at Quincy, Interstate 172 to Interstate 72, and Interstate -2-SJ0118LRB096 21705 GRL 39304 r 1 72 to the crossing of the Mississippi River at Hannibal, 2 Missouri as the Illinois portion of the Chicago - Kansas City 3 Expressway and marked concurrently with the existing route 4 numbers as Illinois Route 110; and be it further 5 RESOLVED, That the Illinois Department of Transportation 6 is requested to erect at every route marker, consistent with 7 State and federal regulations, signs displaying the approved 8 C-KC logo and Illinois Route 110; and be it further 9 RESOLVED, That suitable copies of this resolution be 10 delivered to the Secretary of the Illinois Department of 11 Transportation, the Director of the Missouri Department of 12 Transportation, and the Mayors of Chicago, the Quad-Cities, 13 Galesburg, Monmouth, Macomb, and Quincy..
    [Show full text]
  • 4855 Interstate 55
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM INTERSTATE 55 4855 JACKSON, MS 39206 www.4855Interstate55.com AFFILIATED BUSINESS DISCLOSURE review all such summaries and other documents of whatever nature independently and not rely on the contents of this CBRE, Inc. operates within a global family of companies Memorandum in any manner. with many subsidiaries and/or related entities (each an “Affiliate”) engaging in a broad range of commercial real Neither the Owner or CBRE, Inc, nor any of their respective estate businesses including, but not limited to, brokerage directors, officers, Affiliates or representatives make any services, property and facilities management, valuation, representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the investment fund management and development. At times accuracy or completeness of this Memorandum or any of its 4855 INTERSTATE 55 TABLE OF CONTENTS different Affiliates may represent various clients with contents, and no legal commitment or obligation shall arise competing interests in the same transaction. For example, by reason of your receipt of this Memorandum or use of its this Memorandum may be received by our Affiliates, contents; and you are to rely solely on your investigations and including CBRE Investors, Inc. or Trammell Crow Company. inspections of the Property in evaluating a possible purchase Those, or other, Affiliates may express an interest in the of the real property. property described in this Memorandum (the “Property”) The Owner expressly reserved the right, at its sole discretion, may submit an offer to purchase the Property and may be the to reject any or all expressions of interest or offers to purchase successful bidder for the Property.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interstate Highway System Turns 60
    The Interstate Highway System turns 60: Challenges to Its Ability to Continue to Save Lives, Time and Money JUNE 27, 2016 202-466-6706 tripnet.org Founded in 1971, TRIP ® of Washington, DC, is a nonprofit organization that researches, evaluates and distributes economic and technical data on surface transportation issues. TRIP is sponsored by insurance companies, equipment manufacturers, distributors and suppliers; businesses involved in highway and transit engineering and construction; labor unions; and organizations concerned with efficient and safe surface transportation. Executive Summary Sixty years ago the nation embarked on its greatest public works project, the construction of the Interstate Highway System. President Dwight D. Eisenhower provided strong support for the building of an Interstate Highway System that would improve traffic safety, reduce travel times and improve the nation’s economic productivity. Serving as the most critical transportation link in the nation’s economy, the Interstate Highway System has significantly improved the lives of U.S. residents and visitors. Throughout the nation, the Interstate system allows for high levels of mobility by greatly reducing travel times and providing a significantly higher level of traffic safety than other routes. But 60 years after President Eisenhower articulated a vision for the nation’s transportation system, the U. S. again faces a challenge in modernizing its aging and increasingly congested Interstate highway system. If Americans are to continue to enjoy their current level of personal and commercial mobility on Interstate highways and bridges, the nation will need to make a commitment to identifying a long-term funding source to support a well-maintained Interstate Highway System able to meet the nation’s need for additional mobility.
    [Show full text]
  • 2022 Priority Freight Projects, St. Louis Regional Freightway
    2022 PRIORITY FREIGHT PROJECTS ST LOUIS REGIONAL FREIGHTWAY The St. Louis Regional Freightway’s 2022 Priority Business and industry leaders work directly Projects List represents the infrastructure needs of with local and state officials and departments of the manufacturing and logistics industries in the transportation to set infrastructure priorities by Eastern Missouri and Southwestern Illinois area. helping them to understand how infrastructure and The list includes 21 projects representing a total efficiency impacts on-time delivery and costs. investment of more than $2.75 billion, with more than $1.1 billion covering infrastructure projects The updated 2022 Priority Projects List has that are already funded and under construction, identified the I-70 improvements from Route 141 expected to start in 2021/2022, or programmed to to I-170 in Missouri near the St. Louis Lambert begin within the next few years. The list indicates International Airport as a new high priority project. tremendous progress on a range of projects Other regionally significant projects have made that will strengthen critical roads, bridges, rail significant construction progress or continue to infrastructure, and port and airport facilities across advance towards construction. This includes the the bi-state St. Louis region, supporting multimodal highest priority project, the Merchants Bridge connectivity and providing global access to shippers Replacement (MO-IL) scheduled for completion in and carriers throughout the world. late 2023. Among the projects advancing towards construction are the I-255/Davis St. Ferry Rd The Priority Projects List is a valuable tool used Interchange (IL), I-64 Improvements from Green by the St. Louis Regional Freightway to align and Mount Rd to Illinois Route 158 (Air Mobility Drive) amplify advocacy for support and funding for (IL), segments of I-70 in Missouri and of I-270 critical infrastructure improvements.
    [Show full text]