Screening the Sixties

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Screening the Sixties Screening the Sixties Oliver Gruner Screening the Sixties Hollywood Cinema and the Politics of Memory Oliver Gruner University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom ISBN 978-1-137-49632-4 ISBN 978-1-137-49633-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-49633-1 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016941775. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 The author(s) has/have asserted their right(s) to be identifi ed as the author(s) of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. Cover illustration: © Maksym Yemelyanov / Alamy Stock Photo Printed on acid-free paper This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by Springer Nature The registered company is Macmillan publishers Ltd. London ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, my thanks to everyone at Palgrave Macmillan, and especially Chris Penfold and Harry Fanshawe, for their faith in the project, assistance and advice throughout the writing of this book. Many thanks also to the anonymous reviewer and clearance reader who provided helpful comments and suggestions on the proposal and fi nal draft. My interest in fi lm representations of the Sixties originated during my undergraduate years, developed as I undertook an MA and PhD and has continued to preoccupy me ever since. For more than ten years, I, like the proverbial ex-hippie, have not shut up about the Sixties. In the process I have accumulated many debts to those who have offered advice, constructive criticisms, helpful comments and inspiration (or simply tolerated my retro outbursts). At the University of Liverpool, Julia Hallam sparked my interest in fi lm studies and supervised my undergraduate dissertation on American cinema of the 1960s and 1970s, planting the seeds of my long obsession. When I embarked on postgraduate studies at the University of East Anglia, I was lucky enough to have Peter Krämer as a teacher and, subsequently, as a PhD supervisor. Then and ever since, Peter has been a source of advice, support and encouragement as well as a great mentor and friend. I would particularly like to thank him for his close reading of, and commentary on, this manuscript. Thanks are also due to Mark Jancovich, Yvonne Tasker, Sharon Monteith, Keith Johnston, Rayna Denison and Melanie Williams, who all provided insightful comments, ideas and suggestions on various drafts of my PhD v vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS thesis. And to the postgraduate community at UEA’s School of Film and Television Studies circa 2010—another big thank you. In particular, Richard Nowell read and advised on fi lm analysis after fi lm analysis; his helpful criticisms and knowledge of 1980s cinema were much appreciated. This stage of my research could not have been completed without a grant from the Arts and Humanities Research Council. I am immensely grateful to Seb Manley for his close readings and editorial input over numerous drafts. Seb’s comments, thoughts and suggestions have helped me sharpen, clarify, and crystallise my arguments. Screening the Sixties is, however, only partially informed by my PhD thesis. The book as it appears now started to take shape around the time I moved to Portsmouth. Many thanks to all colleagues and students at the University of Portsmouth, who have made the university such a vibrant and intellectually stimulating a place to research, write and teach. In particular I am grateful to Lincoln Geraghty, who provided much advice and encouragement on my book proposal and various draft chapters, and Eva Balogh for her detailed comments on later drafts. Many thanks also to Simon Hobbs and Dan McCabe for their helpful comments on the Introduction. The university’s conference support fund enabled me to pres- ent related work at the Society for Cinema and Media Studies conference in Seattle. My thanks to those who gave useful feedback on this work. Jonny Davis at the British Film Institute, Joanne Lammers at the Writers Guild Foundation, Jenny Romero at the Margaret Herrick Library and Julie Graham at UCLA Special Collections, as well as all staff at these excellent libraries, were ceaselessly supportive in answering questions, assisting with script requests and helping to retrieve materials. Much of my later research took place at these venues, and I am grateful for their invaluable assistance. My huge thanks to my parents Peter and Maggie Gruner, who not only read and commented on draft after draft and provided encouragement and support during its writing, but also provided a fountain of Sixties reminiscences. And fi nally to Deborah, for her love and support over these past years, without which I would not have been able to start, let alone fi nish, this book. Not long before I completed this manuscript baby Aileen arrived. I’d like to dedicate this book to her. CONTENTS 1 Mourning the Age of Aquarius 1 2 Bringing Them All Back Home 43 3 Go Away and Find Yourself 95 4 Something’s Happening Here 133 5 Come Together 173 6 A Change Has Come 225 7 More Funk In The Trunk 261 Bibliography 269 Index 283 vii LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1.1 ‘Let the Sunshine In’: Hair’s celebratory conclusion 28 Fig. 1.2 Death of an icon: The Rose 36 Fig. 2.1 ‘Fire and Rain’: dancing to James Taylor in Running on Empty 70 Fig. 2.2 Celebrations in Sneakers 84 Fig. 3.1 Watching Swayze: Dirty Dancing 108 Fig. 3.2 The Kennedys arrive: Love Field 121 Fig. 4.1 Jim Morrison (Val Kilmer) on display in The Doors 150 Fig. 5.1 Hippies and Vietnam collide in Bobby 212 Fig. 5.2 The counterculture in Across the Universe 214 Fig. 6.1 Lunch counter sit-ins: The Butler 251 ix INTROD UCTION WELCOME TO THE SIXTIES ‘It’s changing out there’, says Tracy Turnblad. ‘People who are different, their time is coming.’ A television screen fl ickers to the soulful harmo- nies of a black girl group as Tracy coaxes her mother, Edna, out into the Baltimore night. The sidewalks are bathed in neon, storefronts light up like jukeboxes, kids cruise by in a convertible, pregnant women sporting oversize coiffures drink, smoke and chat in a nearby bar, teenagers and adults dance in the road—all accompanied by the repeated refrain: ‘Hey mama, welcome to the Sixties!’ It is all a little too much for Tracy’s mother to bear; she has been confi ned to her house for years and, initially at least, begs to go ‘somewhere stuffi er’. But a new dress and haircut soon cast off those cobwebs and have her quickstepping to a Sixties groove. She’s ‘let go of the past’, she’s ‘hip’, she’s ‘in’, and as a hail of fi reworks explode all around, she and Tracy stand at the threshold of a new epoch. A garish, celebratory, ‘fabulous’ ringing in of the 1960s, this sequence from the musical Hairspray (2007) announces with familiar brio that the times they are a changing. If its visual excess and caricatures lend it a certain tongue-in-cheek tone, it is nevertheless a particularly jubilant demonstration of the magnitude with which American cinema has long invested the Sixties. Indeed, Tracy (Nikki Blonsky) and Edna (played by a cross- dressing John Travolta) are but two in a long line of cinematic protagonists to be swept up in the era’s tumult and transformation. In Hollywood, as in American public life more generally, the Sixties is nothing if not a show stealer. ‘Americans cannot seem to let the sixties go xi xii INTRODUCTION gently into the night,’ observed historian David Farber in 1994. 1 Fourteen years later and a campaign advertisement for Democrat presidential candi- date Barack Obama would demand to know why ‘with all our problems’ his Republican rival John McCain was still ‘talking about the 60s’. 2 The answer, according to political scientist Bernard Von Bothmer, is simple: ‘Because it works, that’s why.’ 3 As books such as Von Bothmer’s Framing the Sixties , Philip Jenkins’ Decade of Nightmares , Daniel Marcus’ Happy Days and Wonder Years and Meta Mendel-Reyes’ Reclaiming Democracy demonstrate, the Sixties has become intrinsic to public debates over the past 40 years, with arbiters of various outlooks seeking to shape public memory in line with their own agendas. 4 Whether events and phenomena such as the Vietnam War, the counterculture and the women’s liberation movement have been attacked or defended, ‘political momentum has been gained’, writes Marcus, ‘by those who have been able to use the past to explain the present, and to legitimate their vision of the future’. 5 At the same time as politicians have debated the legacy of the Sixties, Hollywood too has offered a sustained engagement with the era.
Recommended publications
  • 7.Castrillo-Echart
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Dadun, University of Navarra Pablo Castrillo Towards a narrative definition of [email protected] PhD Candidate and Lecturer. the American political thriller film University of Navarra. Spain. Pablo Echart Abstract [email protected] Senior Lecturer in The Hollywood political thriller is a film genre of unique Screenwriting. University of relevance in the United States, often acting as a reflection of the Navarra. Spain. fears and anxieties of its historical times. At the same time, however, the definition of its identity and boundaries still leaves Submitted room for further specification, perhaps due to the frequent June 4, 2015 consideration of the political thriller as part of the broader Approved September 30, 2015 categories of either thriller narratives or political films. By revising the available literature and filmography and analyzing the narrative features of the classical political thriller, this © 2015 Communication & Society article proposes a deeper definition of the genre that takes into ISSN 0214-0039 account the nature of the broader ‘thriller’ category of films E ISSN 2386-7876 springing from a specific mode of crime fiction that focuses on a doi: 10.15581/003.28.4. 109-123 www.communication-society.com victim or threatened individual as its protagonist, depicts and conveys intense emotional states, portrays an unbalanced and highly existentialist worldview, and travels into the 2015 – Vol. 28(4), pp. 109-123 extraordinary while at the same time holding on to very concrete expectations of verisimilitude. The political thriller How to cite this article: specifies this broader form of narration and links it to dramatic Castrillo, P.
    [Show full text]
  • MULTIPHASE GAS MECHANISMS in GROUNDWATER by ROBERT J
    MULTIPHASE GAS MECHANISMS IN GROUNDWATER By ROBERT J. AGNEW Bachelor of Science in Engineering Technology – Fire Protection and Safety Technology Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 1999 Master of Science in Industrial Hygiene University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Oklahoma City, OK 2002 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 2019 MULTIPHASE GAS MECHANISMS IN GROUNDWATER Dissertation Approved: Dr. Todd Halihan Dissertation Adviser Dr. Javier Vilcaez Dr. Greg Wilber Dr. Lantz Holtzhower ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My deepest appreciation goes to my wife, Gina, for all of her love, support, kindness, and patience throughout this arduous journey. Without her support, unending encouragement, and Pauline wisdom, I could not have finished this task. Her steadfast love has been a buttress against the pressure of this labor and has maintained some semblance of normalcy in our lives, allowing our children to grow and prosper. My children, Caelyn, Xander, and Rowan also have my thanks and admiration for enduring the long hours with me away from home, the missed games, and missed performances. The illustrations in this work are by Liz Roth, Professor of Painting and Drawing, Department of Art, Graphic Design and Art History, Oklahoma State University and by Veronica Reed. This work would be all the poorer without your artistic abilities. This study was made possible by the generosity of the Bruno family who has made the Arbuckle-Simpson Ranch available for various research projects. The Nature Conservancy has facilitated the research at the Arbuckle-Simpson Ranch and has provided lodging at the Pontotoc Ridge Preserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Politics/Personal Authenticity
    PUBLIC POLITICS/PERSONAL AUTHENTICITY: A TALE OF TWO SIXTIES IN HOLLYWOOD CINEMA, 1986- 1994 Oliver Gruner Thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D. University of East Anglia School of Film and Television Studies August, 2010 ©This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that no quotation from the thesis, nor any information derived therefrom, may be published without the author’s prior, written consent. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 5 Chapter One “The Enemy was in US”: Platoon and Sixties Commemoration 62 Platoon in Production, 1976-1982 65 Public Politics/Personal Authenticity: Platoon from Script to Screen 73 From Vietnam to the Sixties: Promotion and Reception 88 Conclusion 101 Chapter Two “There are a lot of things about me that aren’t what you thought”: Dirty Dancing and Women’s Liberation 103 Dirty Dancing in Production, 1980-1987 106 Public Politics/Personal Authenticity: Dirty Dancing from Script to Screen 114 “Have the Time of Your Life”: Promotion and Reception 131 Conclusion 144 Chapter Three Bad Sixties/ Good Sixties: JFK and the Sixties Generation 146 Lost Innocence/Lost Ignorance: Kennedy Commemoration and the Sixties 149 Innocence Lost: Adaptation and Script Development, 1988-1991 155 In Search of Authenticity: JFK ’s “Good Sixties” 164 Through the Looking Glass: Promotion and Reception 173 Conclusion 185 Chapter Four “Out of the Prison of Your Mind”: Framing Malcolm X 188 A Civil Rights Sixties 191 A Change
    [Show full text]
  • 1997 Sundance Film Festival Awards Jurors
    1997 SUNDANCE FILM FESTIVAL The 1997 Sundance Film Festival continued to attract crowds, international attention and an appreciative group of alumni fi lmmakers. Many of the Premiere fi lmmakers were returning directors (Errol Morris, Tom DiCillo, Victor Nunez, Gregg Araki, Kevin Smith), whose earlier, sometimes unknown, work had received a warm reception at Sundance. The Piper-Heidsieck tribute to independent vision went to actor/director Tim Robbins, and a major retrospective of the works of German New-Wave giant Rainer Werner Fassbinder was staged, with many of his original actors fl own in for forums. It was a fi tting tribute to both Fassbinder and the Festival and the ways that American independent cinema was indeed becoming international. AWARDS GRAND JURY PRIZE JURY PRIZE IN LATIN AMERICAN CINEMA Documentary—GIRLS LIKE US, directed by Jane C. Wagner and LANDSCAPES OF MEMORY (O SERTÃO DAS MEMÓRIAS), directed by José Araújo Tina DiFeliciantonio SPECIAL JURY AWARD IN LATIN AMERICAN CINEMA Dramatic—SUNDAY, directed by Jonathan Nossiter DEEP CRIMSON, directed by Arturo Ripstein AUDIENCE AWARD JURY PRIZE IN SHORT FILMMAKING Documentary—Paul Monette: THE BRINK OF SUMMER’S END, directed by MAN ABOUT TOWN, directed by Kris Isacsson Monte Bramer Dramatic—HURRICANE, directed by Morgan J. Freeman; and LOVE JONES, HONORABLE MENTIONS IN SHORT FILMMAKING directed by Theodore Witcher (shared) BIRDHOUSE, directed by Richard C. Zimmerman; and SYPHON-GUN, directed by KC Amos FILMMAKERS TROPHY Documentary—LICENSED TO KILL, directed by Arthur Dong Dramatic—IN THE COMPANY OF MEN, directed by Neil LaBute DIRECTING AWARD Documentary—ARTHUR DONG, director of Licensed To Kill Dramatic—MORGAN J.
    [Show full text]
  • Through FILMS 70 Years of European History Through Films Is a Product in Erasmus+ Project „70 Years of European History 1945-2015”
    through FILMS 70 years of European History through films is a product in Erasmus+ project „70 years of European History 1945-2015”. It was prepared by the teachers and students involved in the project – from: Greece, Czech Republic, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Turkey. It’ll be a teaching aid and the source of information about the recent European history. A DANGEROUS METHOD (2011) Director: David Cronenberg Writers: Christopher Hampton, Christopher Hampton Stars: Michael Fassbender, Keira Knightley, Viggo Mortensen Country: UK | GE | Canada | CH Genres: Biography | Drama | Romance | Thriller Trailer In the early twentieth century, Zurich-based Carl Jung is a follower in the new theories of psychoanalysis of Vienna-based Sigmund Freud, who states that all psychological problems are rooted in sex. Jung uses those theories for the first time as part of his treatment of Sabina Spielrein, a young Russian woman bro- ught to his care. She is obviously troubled despite her assertions that she is not crazy. Jung is able to uncover the reasons for Sa- bina’s psychological problems, she who is an aspiring physician herself. In this latter role, Jung employs her to work in his own research, which often includes him and his wife Emma as test subjects. Jung is eventually able to meet Freud himself, they, ba- sed on their enthusiasm, who develop a friendship driven by the- ir lengthy philosophical discussions on psychoanalysis. Actions by Jung based on his discussions with another patient, a fellow psychoanalyst named Otto Gross, lead to fundamental chan- ges in Jung’s relationships with Freud, Sabina and Emma.
    [Show full text]
  • Intimate Perspectives from the Battlefields of Iraq
    'The Best Covered War in History': Intimate Perspectives from the Battlefields of Iraq by Andrew J. McLaughlin A thesis presented to the University Of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2017 © Andrew J. McLaughlin 2017 Examining Committee Membership The following served on the Examining Committee for this thesis. The decision of the Examining Committee is by majority vote. External Examiner Marco Rimanelli Professor, St. Leo University Supervisor(s) Andrew Hunt Professor, University of Waterloo Internal Member Jasmin Habib Associate Professor, University of Waterloo Internal Member Roger Sarty Professor, Wilfrid Laurier University Internal-external Member Brian Orend Professor, University of Waterloo ii Author's Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. iii Abstract This study examines combat operations from the 2003 invasion of Iraq War from the “ground up.” It utilizes unique first-person accounts that offer insights into the realities of modern warfare which include effects on soldiers, the local population, and journalists who were tasked with reporting on the action. It affirms the value of media embedding to the historian, as hundreds of journalists witnessed major combat operations firsthand. This line of argument stands in stark contrast to other academic assessments of the embedding program, which have criticized it by claiming media bias and military censorship. Here, an examination of the cultural and social dynamics of an army at war provides agency to soldiers, combat reporters, and innocent civilians caught in the crossfire.
    [Show full text]
  • Wmc Investigation: 10-Year Analysis of Gender & Oscar
    WMC INVESTIGATION: 10-YEAR ANALYSIS OF GENDER & OSCAR NOMINATIONS womensmediacenter.com @womensmediacntr WOMEN’S MEDIA CENTER ABOUT THE WOMEN’S MEDIA CENTER In 2005, Jane Fonda, Robin Morgan, and Gloria Steinem founded the Women’s Media Center (WMC), a progressive, nonpartisan, nonproft organization endeav- oring to raise the visibility, viability, and decision-making power of women and girls in media and thereby ensuring that their stories get told and their voices are heard. To reach those necessary goals, we strategically use an array of interconnected channels and platforms to transform not only the media landscape but also a cul- ture in which women’s and girls’ voices, stories, experiences, and images are nei- ther suffciently amplifed nor placed on par with the voices, stories, experiences, and images of men and boys. Our strategic tools include monitoring the media; commissioning and conducting research; and undertaking other special initiatives to spotlight gender and racial bias in news coverage, entertainment flm and television, social media, and other key sectors. Our publications include the book “Unspinning the Spin: The Women’s Media Center Guide to Fair and Accurate Language”; “The Women’s Media Center’s Media Guide to Gender Neutral Coverage of Women Candidates + Politicians”; “The Women’s Media Center Media Guide to Covering Reproductive Issues”; “WMC Media Watch: The Gender Gap in Coverage of Reproductive Issues”; “Writing Rape: How U.S. Media Cover Campus Rape and Sexual Assault”; “WMC Investigation: 10-Year Review of Gender & Emmy Nominations”; and the Women’s Media Center’s annual WMC Status of Women in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • OPPOSITION Ro Revrsrons Concernrnc Sraremenrs by PARTICIPATING WRITERS to the CREDIT ARBITRATION COMMITTEE
    OPPOSITION ro REVrsroNS coNcERNrNc srArEMENrs By PARTICIPATING WRITERS TO THE CREDIT ARBITRATION COMMITTEE The undersigned have all been involved in WGA credit arbitrations, where we are thrust into a competitive process intended to produce "a true and accurate statement of screen authorship." Each credit arbitration is conducted by three anonymous arbiters, whose experience, familiarity with the rules, and willingness to invest the necessary time and effort are only one part of the process. For a multitude of financial and career reasons, the stakes are incredibly high, and statements constitute a participating writer's only chance to speak on his/her own behalf and contribute to the task of thoroughly and accurately evaluating all the material, so that nothing is mis-attributed, given improper weight, or left unconsidered. These statements not only give writers a voice while their fates are being decided, but, if properly crafted, can help mitigate unintentional oversights or confusion on the part of arbiters, many of whom are just as oven¡rhelmed as the writers are, by the guild's extensive rules regarding credit, and by what is often a truly staggering amount of literary material. Writing a thoughtful, comprehensive, and objective statement is always a formidable challenge, and for writers unfamiliar with the process, the learning curve can be quite steep. Simultaneously having to become familiar with the Credits Manual, read and effectively analyze a daunting volume of literary material, and then synthesize this massive amount of information into a cogent, helpful, and readable statement is an arduous task for any writer, particularly if she/he happens to be in the middle of another stressful writing assignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Sagawkit Acceptancespeechtran
    Screen Actors Guild Awards Acceptance Speech Transcripts TABLE OF CONTENTS INAUGURAL SCREEN ACTORS GUILD AWARDS ...........................................................................................2 2ND ANNUAL SCREEN ACTORS GUILD AWARDS .........................................................................................6 3RD ANNUAL SCREEN ACTORS GUILD AWARDS ...................................................................................... 11 4TH ANNUAL SCREEN ACTORS GUILD AWARDS ....................................................................................... 15 5TH ANNUAL SCREEN ACTORS GUILD AWARDS ....................................................................................... 20 6TH ANNUAL SCREEN ACTORS GUILD AWARDS ....................................................................................... 24 7TH ANNUAL SCREEN ACTORS GUILD AWARDS ....................................................................................... 28 8TH ANNUAL SCREEN ACTORS GUILD AWARDS ....................................................................................... 32 9TH ANNUAL SCREEN ACTORS GUILD AWARDS ....................................................................................... 36 10TH ANNUAL SCREEN ACTORS GUILD AWARDS ..................................................................................... 42 11TH ANNUAL SCREEN ACTORS GUILD AWARDS ..................................................................................... 48 12TH ANNUAL SCREEN ACTORS GUILD AWARDS ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ruth Prawer Jhabvala's Adapted Screenplays
    Absorbing the Worlds of Others: Ruth Prawer Jhabvala’s Adapted Screenplays By Laura Fryer Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of a PhD degree at De Montfort University, Leicester. Funded by Midlands 3 Cities and the Arts and Humanities Research Council. June 2020 i Abstract Despite being a prolific and well-decorated adapter and screenwriter, the screenplays of Ruth Prawer Jhabvala are largely overlooked in adaptation studies. This is likely, in part, because her life and career are characterised by the paradox of being an outsider on the inside: whether that be as a European writing in and about India, as a novelist in film or as a woman in industry. The aims of this thesis are threefold: to explore the reasons behind her neglect in criticism, to uncover her contributions to the film adaptations she worked on and to draw together the fields of screenwriting and adaptation studies. Surveying both existing academic studies in film history, screenwriting and adaptation in Chapter 1 -- as well as publicity materials in Chapter 2 -- reveals that screenwriting in general is on the periphery of considerations of film authorship. In Chapter 2, I employ Sandra Gilbert’s and Susan Gubar’s notions of ‘the madwoman in the attic’ and ‘the angel in the house’ to portrayals of screenwriters, arguing that Jhabvala purposely cultivates an impression of herself as the latter -- a submissive screenwriter, of no threat to patriarchal or directorial power -- to protect herself from any negative attention as the former. However, the archival materials examined in Chapter 3 which include screenplay drafts, reveal her to have made significant contributions to problem-solving, characterisation and tone.
    [Show full text]
  • Glorious Technicolor: from George Eastman House and Beyond Screening Schedule June 5–August 5, 2015 Friday, June 5 4:30 the G
    Glorious Technicolor: From George Eastman House and Beyond Screening Schedule June 5–August 5, 2015 Friday, June 5 4:30 The Garden of Allah. 1936. USA. Directed by Richard Boleslawski. Screenplay by W.P. Lipscomb, Lynn Riggs, based on the novel by Robert Hichens. With Marlene Dietrich, Charles Boyer, Basil Rathbone, Joseph Schildkraut. 35mm restoration by The Museum of Modern Art, with support from the Celeste Bartos Fund for Film Preservation; courtesy The Walt Disney Studios. 75 min. La Cucaracha. 1934. Directed by Lloyd Corrigan. With Steffi Duna, Don Alvarado, Paul Porcasi, Eduardo Durant’s Rhumba Band. Courtesy George Eastman House (35mm dye-transfer print on June 5); and UCLA Film & Television Archive (restored 35mm print on July 21). 20 min. [John Barrymore Technicolor Test for Hamlet]. 1933. USA. Pioneer Pictures. 35mm print from The Museum of Modern Art. 5 min. 7:00 The Wizard of Oz. 1939. USA. Directed by Victor Fleming. Screenplay by Noel Langley, Florence Ryerson, Edgar Allan Woolf, based on the book by L. Frank Baum. Music by Harold Arlen, E.Y. Harburg. With Judy Garland, Frank Morgan, Ray Bolger, Bert Lahr, Ray Bolger, Margaret Hamilton, Billie Burke. 35mm print from George Eastman House; courtesy Warner Bros. 102 min. Saturday, June 6 2:30 THE DAWN OF TECHNICOLOR: THE SILENT ERA *Special Guest Appearances: James Layton and David Pierce, authors of The Dawn of Technicolor, 1915-1935 (George Eastman House, 2015). James Layton and David Pierce illustrate Technicolor’s origins during the silent film era. Before Technicolor achieved success in the 1930s, the company had to overcome countless technical challenges and persuade cost-conscious producers that color was worth the extra effort and expense.
    [Show full text]
  • NANCY a film by CHRISTINA CHOE (87 Min., USA, 2018) Language: English World Premiere: Sundance Film Festival 2018 - U.S
    presents NANCY a film by CHRISTINA CHOE (87 min., USA, 2018) Language: English World Premiere: Sundance Film Festival 2018 - U.S. Dramatic Competition **Winner: Waldo Salt Screenwriting Award** Press Contacts: René Ridinger - Smith & Company [email protected] 213.232.1351 Ryan Boring- Samuel Goldwyn Films [email protected] 310.860.3113 CAST (in order of appearance) Nancy ANDREA RISEBOROUGH Betty ANN DOWD Ellen J. SMITH-CAMERON Leo STEVE BUSCEMI Jeb JOHN LEGUIZAMO Beth T SAHARA MEER Deb VIRGINIA KULL Raj SAMRAT CHAKRABARTI Waitress LINDA KUTRUBES Dr. Waters OLLI HAASKIVI Funeral Director TIBOR FELDMAN Jake RENÉ IFRAH Jordan OWEN CAMPBELL FILMMAKERS Written and Directed by CHRISTINA CHOE Produced by AMY LO MICHELLE CAMERON Producer ANDREA RISEBOROUGH Executive Producers BARBARA BROCCOLI MICHAEL G. WILSON MYNETTE LOUIE RACHEL SONG Co-Executive Producers JULIE PARKER BENELLO DAN COGAN GERALYN DREYFOUS WENDY ETTINGER Cinematography by ZOË WHITE Edited by DAVID GUTNIK Music by PETER RAEBURN Production Design by CHARLOTTE ROYER Costume Design by TERE DUNCAN Casting by LAUREN GREY LOIS DRABKIN SYNOPSIS “Fiction is the lie through which we tell the truth” – Albert Camus NANCY is a provocative psychodrama about love, intimacy, and trust – and the slippery nature of truth. A serial imposter, Nancy has gotten more and more comfortable assuming fake personas, and lines have started to blur between fact and fiction, and performance versus reality. Blindsided by the death of her mother, and facing rejection by a love interest, Nancy’s life begins to unravel. When she meets a couple whose daughter went missing thirty years ago, she becomes increasingly convinced these strangers are her real parents.
    [Show full text]