DOCSLIB.ORG

A Rccaarchitecture California the Journal of the American Institute Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Rccaarchitecture California the Journal of the American Institute Of architecture california the journal of the american institute of architects california council a r cCA aiacc design awards issue 04.3 photo finish ❉ Silent Archives ❉ AIACC Member Photographs ❉ The Subject is Architecture arcCA 0 4 . 3 aiacc design a wards issue p h o t o f i n i s h Co n t e n t Tracking the Awards 8 Value of the 25 Year Award 10 ❉ Eric Naslund, FAIA Silent Archives: 14 In the Blind Spot of Modernism ❉ Pierluigi Serraino, Assoc. AIA AIACC Member Photographs 18 ❉ AIACC membership The Subject is Architecture 30 ❉ Ruth Keffer AIACC 2004 AWARDS 45 Maybeck Award: 48 Daniel Solomon, FAIA Firm of the Year Award: 52 Marmol Radziner and Associates Lifetime Achievement 56 Award: Donlyn Lyndon, FAIA ❉ Interviewed by John Parman Lifetime Achievement 60 Award: Daniel Dworsky, FAIA ❉ Interviewed by Christel Bivens Kanda Design Awards 64 Reflections on the Awards 85 Jury: Eric Naslund, FAIA, and Hugh Hardy, FAIA ❉ Interviewed by Kenneth Caldwell Savings By Design A w a r d s 88 Co m m e n t 03 Co n t r i b u t o r s 05 C r e d i t s 9 9 Co d a 1 0 0 1 arcCA 0 4 . 3 Editor Tim Culvahouse, AIA a r c C A is dedicated to providing a forum for the exchange of ideas among mem- bers, other architects and related disciplines on issues affecting California archi- Editorial Board Carol Shen, FAIA, Chair tecture. a r c C A is published quarterly and distributed to AIACC members as part of their membership dues. In addition, single copies and subscriptions are avail- Pierluigi Serraino, Assoc. AIA able at the following rates: Peter H. Dodge, FAIA Single copies: $6 AIA members; $9 non-members. Wendy Kohn Subscriptions (four issues per year): $24 AIA members; David Meckel, FAIA $15 students; $34 non-members, U.S.; $38 Canada; $42 foreign. Paul Halajian, AIA Subscriptions: arcCA, c/o AIACC, 1303 J Street, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95814, Kris Miller-Fisher, AIA www.aiacc.org Eric Naslund, FAIA Advertising: 877.887.7175. Lee I. Lippert, AIA, Ex-officio Inquiries and submissions: Tim Culvahouse, Editor: [email protected]; c/o AIACC, 1303 J Street, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95814; 916.448.9082; Design Bob Aufuldish fax 916.442.5346. Bob Aufuldish, Aufuldish & Warinner: [email protected]. Ragina Johnson Aufuldish & Warinner Copyright and reprinting: © 2004 by AIACC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Permission is granted through the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. Production Greg Delviscio a r c C A is a trademark of AIACC. Lorraine Sacca a r c C A (ISSN 0738-1132) is published by The McGraw-Hill Companies on behalf of Publisher Roylin Downs The American Institute of Architects, California Council. McGraw-Hill and AIACC are not responsible for statements or opinions expressed in a r c C A, nor do such state- California Regional Publisher ments or opinions necessarily express the views of AIACC or its committees. Con- McGraw-Hill Construction tributors are responsible for credits and copyright permissions. Third class postage paid at Salt Lake City. Printed on recycled paper by Banta Book Group. AIACC Lori Reed Director of Marketing and Communications AIACC 2004 Board of Directors Gary L. McGavin, AIA AIA San Francisco The American Institute of Architects, AIA Regional Directors AIA Long Beach George J. Calys, AIA California Council Michael M. Hricak Jr., FAIA John A. Kaytor, AIA Charles A. Higueras, AIA 1303 J Street, Suite 200 Carl F. Meyer, AIA AIA Los Angeles Thomas E. Lollini, FAIA Sacramento, CA 95814 Gordon N. Park, AIA, CDS M. Charles Bernstein, AIA Clark D. Manus, FAIA 916.448.9082 Bruce Race, FAIA John R. Dale, AIA Roseanne McNulty, AIA 916.442.5346 fax National Associate Director Paul A. Danna, AIA Beverly Jo Prior, AIA www.aiacc.org John M. Cary, Jr., Assoc. AIA Mehrdad Farivar, AIA AIA San Joaquin Associate Directors Robert G. Hale Jr., AIA Arthur T. Dyson, AIA 2004 Executive Committee Tina Marie Bauer, Assoc. AIA Stephen H. Kanner, FAIA AIA San Mateo County President Douglas Smith, Assoc. AIA AIA Monterey Bay Philip J. Bona, AIA David J. Brotman, FAIA Student Director Michael L. Waxer, AIA AIA Santa Barbara First Vice President/President-elect Rollin Homer AIA Orange County Paul Polrier, AIA Stephan Castellanos, FAIA AIA California Central Coast Kevin Fleming, AIA Mark D. Wienke, AIA Treasurer Desiree V. Peacock, AIA Jeffrey T. Gill, AIA AIA Santa Clara Valley Jeffrey J. Emrick, PE AIA AIA California Desert James T. Wirick, AIA Richard C. Kirchner, AIA Secretary Lance Christopher O’Donnel, AIA AIA Pasadena & Foothill Lee Salin, AIA Anne Laird-Blanton, AIA AIA Central Valley Fred P. Wesley, AIA AIA Sierra Valley Vice President of Nicholas D. Docous, AIA Ara Zenobians, FAIA Christina D.B. Frankel, AIA Regulation and Practice Virgil C. Hancock, AIA AIA Redwood Empire AIA Ventura County John C. Melcher, AIA Donald R. Sharp, AIA Michael Palmer, AIA Howard E. Leach, AIA Vice President of Legislative Affairs AIA East Bay AIA San Diego Pamela M. Touschner, AIA John S. Nelson, AIA Jack Carpenter, FAIA AIACC Staff Vice President of Steven R. Winkel, FAIA Gordon R. Carrier, AIA Executive Vice President Communications/Public Affairs AIA Golden Empire Larry Allen Hoeksema, AIA Paul W. Welch, Jr., Hon. AIA Lee I. Lippert, AIA Bruce M. Biggar, AIA AIA San Fernando Valley Lori Reed Executive Vice President AIA Inland California John P. Grounds, AIA Director of Marketing and Communications Paul W. Welch, Jr., Hon. AIA Mark Everett Graham, AIA Comment what was given by the circumstances. a r c C A , itself, operates within a number of con- straints—many set, as one might suppose, by cost. The size of the journal, the matte paper, and the duotone printing are all, in part, a response to a a r c C A is thicker this quarter. We’ve added a full- limited budget, one structured to lessen the bur- color section to celebrate the AIACC 2004 award den on dues revenue. winners: Design Awards, Maybeck Award, Firm of the Year Award, and Lifetime Achievement A w a r d s . But there are other reasons, as well, chief among Also included are awards given by Savings B y them a decision not to try to be a mini-Architec- Design, a sponsor of this special section. All of our tural Record, but rather to distinguish what we do sponsors, to whom we’re most grateful, are rec- as clearly as possible from it and similar maga- ognized on the back “cover” of the section; take a zines. Our mission is not to highlight individual look, and, if you have the opportunity, thank them buildings, but rather to illuminate the broader for their support. context within which architects practice. Over the last month or so, I’ve received two thought- Of course, we’re delighted to celebrate—and to ful letters critical of arcCA’s graphic design; dur- make a lasting record of—the individual buildings ing the same period, we’ve received a graphic that have won awards. But we also expect the design award, one of many that the magazine has special awards section to call out some of these earned. In an issue devoted to awards, the coinci- graphic distinctions, so I want to be clear about dence is worth noting. The simplest way to them. I’m proud of our graphic design, and I’m account for the discrepancy is to say that opin- committed to the identity that it has helped estab- ions differ, which is true enough. Some people like lish for a r c C A as one of the most thoughtful AIA some things, and other people like others. component publications in the country. Alternatively, one might say not that opinions dif- Which is not to say that, as our funding increases fer, but that c r i t e r i a differ. The people who give (which will happen most quickly if readers encour- graphic design awards aren’t likely to be the same age their favorite consultants to advertise here), I people who make up our readership; they have would not entertain the possibility of a larger for- different expertise, recall different precedents, mat, to accommodate larger images and type; or are aware of different constraints. Similarly, our a paper stock that would afford higher resolution own award juries differ from year to year, as does printing; or more color. Those of you who have the context within which the awards are judged. suggested as much, know that you’re heard. Trends emerge and fade. Hence, we found it use- Meanwhile, enjoy the pictures. t ful last year to highlight several years of Design Tim Culvahouse, AIA, editor Awards, for your comparison. We repeat that exercise this year, in “Tracking the Awards.” I mentioned constraints, an acknowledgment of E R R A T A which may constitute a third level of differentia- In a r c C A 04.3, “Small Towns,” we made two errors in tion in the judging of work, graphic or architectur- attributing sponsorship for David Dewar’s AIA presentations. al. Reflecting on the Design Awards selection The AIA component sponsor is not “AIA Sacramento Chap- process, juror Eric Naslund, FAIA, notes that this ter” (there is no such thing) but rather AIA Central Valley year’s Awards Jury took care to try to distinguish Chapter. And the sponsoring firm is the Lionakis Beaumont what the architect brought to the project from Design Group.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Poetry of Robinson Jeffers
    The Poetry of Robinson Jeffers 1 Table of Contents The Poetry of Robinson Jeffers About the Book.................................................... 3 “Permanent things, About the Author ................................................. 4 or things forever Historical and Literary Context .............................. 7 Other Works/Adaptations ..................................... 8 renewed, like the Discussion Questions............................................ 9 grass and human Additional Resources .......................................... 10 passions, are the Credits .............................................................. 11 material for poetry...” Preface The poetry of Robinson Jeffers is emotionally direct, magnificently musical, and philosophically profound. No one has ever written more powerfully about the natural beauty of the American West. Determined to write a truthful poetry purged of ephemeral things, Jeffers cultivated a style at What is the NEA Big Read? once lyrical, tough-minded, and timeless. A program of the National Endowment for the Arts, NEA Big Read broadens our understanding of our world, our communities, and ourselves through the joy of sharing a good book. Managed by Arts Midwest, this initiative offers grants to support innovative community reading programs designed around a single book. A great book combines enrichment with enchantment. It awakens our imagination and enlarges our humanity. It can offer harrowing insights that somehow console and comfort us. Whether you’re a regular reader already or making up for lost time, thank you for joining the NEA Big Read. NEA Big Read The National Endowment for the Arts 2 About the Book Introduction to Robinson Jeffers The poetry of Robinson Jeffers is distractingly memorable, not only for its strong music, but also for the hard edge of its wisdom. His verse, especially the wild, expansive narratives that made him famous in the 1920s, does not fit into the conventional definitions of modern American poetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments
    Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments No. Name Address CHC No. CF No. Adopted Community Plan Area CD Notes 1 Leonis Adobe 23537 Calabasas Road 08/06/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 3 Woodland Hills - West Hills 2 Bolton Hall 10116 Commerce Avenue & 7157 08/06/1962 Sunland - Tujunga - Lake View 7 Valmont Street Terrace - Shadow Hills - East La Tuna Canyon 3 Plaza Church 535 North Main Street and 100-110 08/06/1962 Central City 14 La Iglesia de Nuestra Cesar Chavez Avenue Señora la Reina de Los Angeles (The Church of Our Lady the Queen of Angels) 4 Angel's Flight 4th Street & Hill Street 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Dismantled May 1969; Moved to Hill Street between 3rd Street and 4th Street, February 1996 5 The Salt Box 339 South Bunker Hill Avenue (Now 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Moved from 339 Hope Street) South Bunker Hill Avenue (now Hope Street) to Heritage Square; destroyed by fire 1969 6 Bradbury Building 300-310 South Broadway and 216- 09/21/1962 Central City 14 224 West 3rd Street 7 Romulo Pico Adobe (Rancho 10940 North Sepulveda Boulevard 09/21/1962 Mission Hills - Panorama City - 7 Romulo) North Hills 8 Foy House 1335-1341 1/2 Carroll Avenue 09/21/1962 Silver Lake - Echo Park - 1 Elysian Valley 9 Shadow Ranch House 22633 Vanowen Street 11/02/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 12 Woodland Hills - West Hills 10 Eagle Rock Eagle Rock View Drive, North 11/16/1962 Northeast Los Angeles 14 Figueroa (Terminus), 72-77 Patrician Way, and 7650-7694 Scholl Canyon Road 11 The Rochester (West Temple 1012 West Temple Street 01/04/1963 Westlake 1 Demolished February Apartments) 14, 1979 12 Hollyhock House 4800 Hollywood Boulevard 01/04/1963 Hollywood 13 13 Rocha House 2400 Shenandoah Street 01/28/1963 West Adams - Baldwin Hills - 10 Leimert City of Los Angeles May 5, 2021 Page 1 of 60 Department of City Planning No.
    [Show full text]
  • William Turnbull, Jr./MLTW Collection, 1959-1997
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt5s20213j Online items available Inventory of the William Turnbull, Jr./MLTW Collection, 1959-1997 Betsy Frederick-Rothwell and Laura Tatum Environmental Design Archives College of Environmental Design 230 Wurster Hall #1820 University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-1820 Phone: (510) 642-5124 Fax: (510) 642-2824 Email: [email protected] http://www.ced.berkeley.edu/cedarchives/ © 2005 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Inventory of the William Turnbull, 2000-9 1 Jr./MLTW Collection, 1959-1997 Inventory of the William Turnbull, Jr./MLTW Collection, 1959-1997 Collection number: 2000-9 Environmental Design Archives University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Processed by: Betsy Frederick-Rothwell and Laura Tatum Date Completed: December 2004 Encoded by: Dayna Holz © 2005 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: William Turnbull, Jr./MLTW collection Dates: 1959-1997 Collection number: 2000-9 Creator: Turnbull, William Creator: Moore, Lyndon, Turnbull, and Whitaker Collection Size: 96 cartons, 14 boxes, 2 flat boxes, 13 linear feet mounted and framed material, approximately 700 tubes, 11 artifacts Repository: Environmental Design Archives. College of Environmental Design. University of California, Berkeley. Berkeley, California Abstract: The collection consists of records of architect William Turnbull Jr. and the Moore, Lyndon, Turnbull, and Whitaker architectural firm. The majority of the collection documents William Turnbull Jr./MLTW projects between 1958-1997. The Sea Ranch development, commissioned by Oceanic Properties, is the development that put Turnbull on the architectural map, as well as influenced the look of developments on the Pacific coastline for decades to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Sur for Other Uses, See Big Sur (Disambiguation)
    www.caseylucius.com [email protected] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Big Sur For other uses, see Big Sur (disambiguation). Big Sur is a lightly populated region of the Central Coast of California where the Santa Lucia Mountains rise abruptly from the Pacific Ocean. Although it has no specific boundaries, many definitions of the area include the 90 miles (140 km) of coastline from the Carmel River in Monterey County south to the San Carpoforo Creek in San Luis Obispo County,[1][2] and extend about 20 miles (30 km) inland to the eastern foothills of the Santa Lucias. Other sources limit the eastern border to the coastal flanks of these mountains, only 3 to 12 miles (5 to 19 km) inland. Another practical definition of the region is the segment of California State Route 1 from Carmel south to San Simeon. The northern end of Big Sur is about 120 miles (190 km) south of San Francisco, and the southern end is approximately 245 miles (394 km) northwest of Los Angeles. The name "Big Sur" is derived from the original Spanish-language "el sur grande", meaning "the big south", or from "el país grande del sur", "the big country of the south". This name refers to its location south of the city of Monterey.[3] The terrain offers stunning views, making Big Sur a popular tourist destination. Big Sur's Cone Peak is the highest coastal mountain in the contiguous 48 states, ascending nearly a mile (5,155 feet/1571 m) above sea level, only 3 miles (5 km) from the ocean.[4] The name Big Sur can also specifically refer to any of the small settlements in the region, including Posts, Lucia and Gorda; mail sent to most areas within the region must be addressed "Big Sur".[5] It also holds thousands of marathons each year.
    [Show full text]
  • DATE ISSUED: April 11, 2013 REPORT NO
    DATE ISSUED: April 11, 2013 REPORT NO. HRB-13-018 ATTENTION: Historical Resources Board Agenda of April 25, 2013 SUBJECT: ITEM #11 – Case Study House #23C APPLICANT: Sara Loe, Los Angeles Conservancy Modernism Committee Owner: Nancy and Joseph Manno LOCATION: 2329 Rue de Anne, 92037, La Jolla Community, Council District 1 DESCRIPTION: Review the National Register Nomination of Case Study House #23C STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend the listing of Case Study House #23C located at 2329 Rue de Anne to the Office of Historic Preservation. BACKGROUND This item is being brought before the Historical Resources Board pursuant to the Office of Historic Preservation requirement that the local jurisdiction be provided 60 days to review and comment on a National Register of Historic Places nomination. The nomination for Case Study House #23C is part of a multiple properties listing being nominated to the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A and C at the local level of significance for its association with John Entenza and Arts & Architecture magazine’s experimental modern housing in the post war years and for embodying the distinctive characteristics of residential architecture of the Modern Movement in California, and the Case Study House program in particular. The multiple property submission, under the context: Experimental modern residential architecture of the Case Study House Program in California: 1945-1966, covers the houses that were part of the Case Study Program in California from 1945 to 1966. ANALYSIS A National Register of Historic Places Nomination Report was prepared by Peter Moruzzi and Sara Loe which concludes that the resource is significant under National Register Criteria A and C.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHITECTURE PROGRAM Summary Notes ROYAL CONSERVATORY of MUSIC & UNIVERSITY of TORONTO Walking Tour
    ARCHITECTURE PROGRAM summary notes ROYAL CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC & UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO walking tour prepared by instructor Marta O'Brien See the world through a different angle! www.skope.ca We began this tour with a controversial addition to a century-old museum: MICHAEL LEE-CHIN CRYSTAL 2003-08 Daniel Libeskind with Bregman+Hamann • Royal Ontario Museum (ROM) dates from early 1900s & had major additions in the 1930s & 1980s (part of 1980s addition was demolished for the Crystal) • Crystal is steel structure; cladding is 25% glass & 75% extruded aluminum • controversial due to angular form & the way it connects to the heritage buildings Then, we toured inside a music school & performance centre: ROYAL CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC (RCM) & TELUS CENTRE FOR PERFORMANCE & LEARNING 2005-08 KPMB; lead designer Marianne McKenna 2005-08 restoration of heritage building Goldsmith Borgal & Co Architects • founded 1886, RCM provides education for 21 different musical instruments plus voice, curriculum design, assessment, performance training, teacher certification, & arts-based social programs • complex attracts up to 10,000 people weekly to classes & performances • extension state-of-the-art centre for performance & learning with new studios & performance spaces • Box Office is low-iron glass; performance space above clad in Spanish slate with hand-cut rough finish to complement rough masonry of heritage building • 1m deep soundproof windows formed by pairing 2 standard curtain-wall systems around generous air space; mahogany surrounds give polished
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPSForm 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties ow toi Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). e appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter l ill i " For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Folger Estate Stable Historic District_____________________ other names/site number Jones Ranch ________________________ 2. Location street & number 4040 Woodside Road___________ NA [H not for publication city or town Woodside_____________________ NAG vicinity state California_______ code CA county San Mateo. code 081_ zip code 94062 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this £3 nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property E3 meets D does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally n statewide 13 locally. ( Q See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date California Office of Historic Preservation State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property D meets Q does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Century Modernism Historic Context
    mid-century Modernism Historic Context September 2008 Prepared for the City of Fresno Planning & Development Department 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 Prepared by Planning Resource Associates, Inc. 1416 N. Broadway Fresno, CA 93721 City of Fresno mid-century Modernism Historic Context mid-century Modernism, Fresno Historical Context Prepared For City of Fresno, Planning and Development Department Prepared By Planning Resource Associates, Inc. 1416 N. Broadway Fresno CA, 93721 Project Team Planning Resource Associates, Inc. 1416 Broadway Street Fresno, CA 93721 Lauren MacDonald, Architectural Historian Lauren MacDonald meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications in Architectural History and History Acknowledgements Research efforts were aided by contributions of the following individuals and organizations: City of Fresno Planning and Development Department Karana Hattersley-Drayton, Historic Preservation Project Manager Fresno County Public Library, California History and Genealogy Room William Secrest, Librarian Fresno Historical Society Maria Ortiz, Archivist / Librarian Jill Moffat, Executive Director John Edward Powell Eldon Daitweiler, Fresno Modern American Institute of Architects, San Joaquin Chapter William Stevens, AIA Les Traeger, AIA Bob Dyer, AIA Robin Gay McCline, AIA Jim Oakes, AIA Martin Temple, AIA Edwin S. Darden, FAIA William Patnaude, AIA Hal Tokmakian Steve Weil 1 City of Fresno mid-century Modernism Historic Context TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………….3
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Shulman
    In 1946, Julius Shulman authored a Los Angeles Times article entitled, "Modern is More than a Great Adventure.” Animatedly worded, he told readers to "forget the old prejudice that modern is extreme" and called for the "elimination of artificial fireplaces, false shutters, and gingerbread." Unless otherwise noted, all images are by Julius Shulman. Julius Shulman Photography Archive, Research Library at the Getty Research Institute. ©J. Paul Getty Trust. (2004.R.10) Julius Shulman at work, ca. 1950. Image courtesy Judy McKee. As we reflect on his adventure promoting architecture and design, we realize there are even more stories to be told through his extensive archive. Julius Shulman photographing Case Study House #22, Pierre Koenig, photographed in 1960. Now housed at the Getty Research Institute, we find iconic images of modern living . Case Study House #22, Pierre Koenig, photographed in 1960. as well as some images of . gingerbread. Outtake of a Christmas cookie assignment for Sunset magazine, 1948. More than a great adventure, the Julius Shulman Photography Archive illustrates the lifelong career of Julius Shulman . Julius Shulman on assignment in Israel, 1959. in California . Downtown Los Angeles at night showing Union Bank Plaza, photographed in 1968. across the United States . Marina City, Bertrand Goldberg, Chicago, Illinois, photographed in 1963. and abroad. View of Ministry of Justice and Government Building from Senate Building, Oscar Niemeyer, Brasìlia, Brazil, photographed in 1977. Interspersed throughout the archive are handwritten thoughts . essays . occasional celebrity sightings . Actress Jayne Mansfield demonstrates an in-counter blender for NuTone Inc., 1959. and photographic evidence of his spirited sense of humor! The last shot of 153 images taken at Bullock’s Pasadena, Wurdeman and Becket, 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • Eames House Case Study #8 : a Precedent Study Lauren Martin Table of Contents
    EAMES HOUSE CASE STUDY #8 : A PRECEDENT STUDY LAUREN MARTIN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. TITLE PAGE 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS 3. WHO? 4. WHERE & WHY? 5. DESIGN 6. PROPERTY DETAILS & SPECS 7.PLANS & SECTIONS 8. ELEVATIONS 9. PROGRAM 10. EXPERIENCE 11. SUSTAINABILITY 12. BIBLOGRAPHY WHO? C “EVENUTALLY, EVERYTHING CONNECTS” The Eameses are best known for their H -CHARLES EAMES groundbreaking contributions to architecture, furniture design, industrial A design and manufacturing, and the photographic arts. R “THE ARCHITECT & THE PAINTER” L Charles Eames was born in 1907, in St. Louis Missouri. He attended school there, developing an interest in engineering and architecture. By 1930 he E had opened his own architectural office. Later, he became the head of the design department at Cranbrook Academy. Ray Eames was born in 1912 in Sacramento, California. She studied painting with Hans Hofmann in New York before moving on to Cranbrook Academy where she met and assisted S Charles and Eero Saarinen in preparing designs for the MOMA’s Organic Furniture Competition. Married in 1941, they continued furniture design and later architectural design. & R A Y WHERE? WHY? In 1949, Charles and Ray designed and built their own home in Pacific Palisades, California, as part of the Case Study House Program sponsored by Arts & Architecture magazine. Located in the Pacific Palisades area Their design and innovative use of materials made the house a mecca for architects and designers from both near and far. Today, it is of Los Angeles, California. The Eames considered one of the most important post-war residences anywhere in House is composed of a residence and the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Photo Proof Pages
    F cover 42 summer14:ToC 4/9/14 12:30 PM Page 1 john entenza house 12 texas & florida updates 34, 60 the past perfected 46 SUMMER 2014 $6.95 us/can On sale until August 31, 2014 AtomicRanch 42 3/19/14 6:21 PM Page 1 AUDREY DINING made to order made in america made to last KYOTO DINING SOHO BEDROOM FUSION END TABLE Available near you at: California Benicia - Ironhorse Home Furnishings (707) 747-1383, Capitola - Hannah’s Home Furnishings (831) 462-3270, Long Beach - Metropolitan Living (562) 733-4030, Monterey - Europa Designs (831) 372-5044, San Diego - Lawrance Contemporary Furniture (800) 598-4605, San Francisco - Mscape (415) 543-1771, Santa Barbara - Michael Kate Interiors (805) 963-1411, Studio City - Bedfellows (818) 985-0500, Torrance - Contemporary Lifestyles (310) 214-2600, Thousand Oakes - PTS (805) 496-4804, Colorado Fort Collins - Forma Furniture (970) 204-9700, Connecticut New Haven - Fairhaven (203) 776-3099, District of Columbia Washington - Urban Essentials (202) 299-0640, Florida Sarasota - Copenhagen Imports (941) 923-2569, Georgia Atlanta - Direct Furniture (404) 477-0038, Illinois Chicago - Eurofurniture (800) 243-1955, Indiana Indianapolis - Houseworks (317) 578-7000, Iowa Cedar Falls - Home Interiors (319) 266-1501, Manitoba Winnipeg - Bella Moda (204) 783-4000, Maryland Columbia - Indoor Furniture (410) 381-7577, Massachusetts Acton - Circle Furniture (978) 263-7268, Boston - Circle Furniture (617) 778-0887, Cambridge - Circle Furniture (617) 876-3988, Danvers - Circle Furniture (978) 777-2690, Framingham - Circle
    [Show full text]
  • Eames House: a Precedent Study
    EAMES HOUSE: A PRECEDENT STUDY Lea Santano & Lauren Martin Table Of Contents LOCATED in the Pacific Palisades General Information THE EAMESES are best known for area of Los Angeles, California. The Eames their groundbreaking contributions to House is composed of a residence and architecture, furniture design, industrial studio overlooking the Pacific Ocean. design and manufacturing, and the photographic arts. “The Architect & The Painter” THE DESIGN is one of the few architectural works DESIGNED by Charles and Ray Eames, the original attributed to Charles Eames, and embodies many of design of the house was proposed by Charles and Ray the distinguishing characteristics and ideals of postwar as part of the famous Case Study House program for Modernism in the United States. John Entenza’s Arts & Architecture magazine. DATES OF SIGNIFIGANCE for THE EAMES HOUSE THE IDEA of a Case Study house was the Eames House coincide with the has been regarded as one of to hypothesize a modern household, residency of its designers, extending the most significant elaborate its functional requirements, have from 1949 until 1988. experiments in American an esteemed architect develop a design Other dates include 1978. domestic architecture. that met those requirements using modern materials and construction processes. SITE INFORMATION AND SPECIFICS PLANS/AXO/SECTIONS The Studio Bay Above is a picture of the original design of the Eames House. It was later adjusted to fit in with the The Resdiential Bay environment surrounding the property. The Eameses wanted to build something that worked with the site, not just something placed on top of it. This axonometric drawing breaks down the Case Study House concept and construction #8 of the Eames House.
    [Show full text]