DOCSLIB.ORG

Eames House Case Study #8 : a Precedent Study Lauren Martin Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eames House Case Study #8 : a Precedent Study Lauren Martin Table of Contents EAMES HOUSE CASE STUDY #8 : A PRECEDENT STUDY LAUREN MARTIN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. TITLE PAGE 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS 3. WHO? 4. WHERE & WHY? 5. DESIGN 6. PROPERTY DETAILS & SPECS 7.PLANS & SECTIONS 8. ELEVATIONS 9. PROGRAM 10. EXPERIENCE 11. SUSTAINABILITY 12. BIBLOGRAPHY WHO? C “EVENUTALLY, EVERYTHING CONNECTS” The Eameses are best known for their H -CHARLES EAMES groundbreaking contributions to architecture, furniture design, industrial A design and manufacturing, and the photographic arts. R “THE ARCHITECT & THE PAINTER” L Charles Eames was born in 1907, in St. Louis Missouri. He attended school there, developing an interest in engineering and architecture. By 1930 he E had opened his own architectural office. Later, he became the head of the design department at Cranbrook Academy. Ray Eames was born in 1912 in Sacramento, California. She studied painting with Hans Hofmann in New York before moving on to Cranbrook Academy where she met and assisted S Charles and Eero Saarinen in preparing designs for the MOMA’s Organic Furniture Competition. Married in 1941, they continued furniture design and later architectural design. & R A Y WHERE? WHY? In 1949, Charles and Ray designed and built their own home in Pacific Palisades, California, as part of the Case Study House Program sponsored by Arts & Architecture magazine. Located in the Pacific Palisades area Their design and innovative use of materials made the house a mecca for architects and designers from both near and far. Today, it is of Los Angeles, California. The Eames considered one of the most important post-war residences anywhere in House is composed of a residence and the world. THE SKETCH OF THE ORIGINAL DESIGN studio overlooking the Pacific Ocean. FOR CASE STUDY HOUSE #8 The idea of a Case Study house was to hypothesize a modern household, elaborate its functional requirements, have an esteemed architect develop a design that met those requirements using modern materials and construction processes, and then to actually build the home. Modular in its design, the house is composed of 20’ x 7’ 4” bays that rise to a height of 17 feet. DESIGN Each bay is defined by a steel frame consisting of two rows of 4-inch H-columns set 20 feet apart, with a 12-inch open-web joist forming the top member. On the rear (west) elevation, the vertical member of each frame is partially embedded in an 8-foot high poured concrete retaining wall at the base of the slope Composed of two distinct volumes, a living component (or that forms the lower part of the west elevation in both components. Steel decking residence) and a working component (or studio). The two running perpendicular to the frames forms the underside of the flatroof. volumes are arranged in a linear configurationand separat- ed by an open court. Both volumes are rectangular in plan with horizontal massing, and are situated along the western edge of the property. The roof is a gravel surfaced, built-up assembly. The 20-foot wide dimen- The residence is 1,500 square feet, with sion of the frames define the width of both the residence and studio. The residence consists of eight bays, and the studio is five bays wide. The open the studio court that separates the two structures is the equivalent off our bays in containing an additional 1,000 square feet. width. The ex- posed steel frames are painted black, to delineate each bay and the shared structural rhythm of the two components. PROPERTY DETAILS & SPECS Materials: Below is an exploded axonometric drawing Foundation- Concrete. dispalying the structural system of the Eames House. Walls- Glass, stucco, woods, asbestos, metals, & The pre-frabricated materials allowed for an extremley synthetics. orderly and gridded process of design and construction. Roof- Asphalt. Other: Metal (steel frame) Structural Systems: Eames saw the many beneifits of a mod- ular system, including symmetry, inherent strength, the absence of waster and the speed of construction. Diagonal cross-bracing, composed of metal cables visible on the exterior, provides structural stability for the frames. PLANS & SECTIONS First Floor Plan Above are section cuts of the Eames House. You can see an overview section of the entire property, showing both residential and studio spaces. There is a more detailed section cut showing the spiral staircase and kitchen area, which also displays material intergrity and detail. Second Floor/ Upper Level Plan E L EAST & WEST ELEVATIONS E V A T I O N S NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATIONS PROGRAM The two main spaces of the house are the residential bay and the studio bay, seperated by an outdoor space, that is continued living space. View from the loft/upper living room of the residential bay. The house was designed as a residential space for Charles and Ray Eames. They created and designed this house based on functions for their use. Both residential and studio bays are open concept living areas, with continious open spaces. The rooms are on a mezzanine that opens into the living room, beneath which is the library. On this floor are you will find the the living room, kitchen, studio and warehouse; while The studio is on the ground on the upper floors are the bedrooms and floor independent of the bathroom.The plant is connected to the rest volume devoted to housing, of the house by stairs and balconies that but at the same time allows the height of the double rooms. interconnected through the roof. EXPERIENCE The interior is extremley open, with one space flowing easily into the next. There are two stories, the lower level provides the utilitarian spaces, kitchen/living/etc. The most obvious of the aesthetic features of the The house has exposed steel frames, Eames House is the Mondrian inspired exterior, painted in black, which delinates each which is shown by the use of a combination of bay and the shared structural rhythm of transperent and translucent glass. the two components. There is a spiral staircase, connected with similiar materials to that of the exterior. (Steel and metal pipes.) The interior space carries over the same usage of material. Experience The second floor/loft overlooks the double-height living space in the southern portion of the residence. The private spaces are located on the second floor.There are two bedrooms and two bathrooms on the second level, with a sky light above the staircase. Other materials feautured in the There are two outdoor patios. Both Each bay of the house is in-filled exterior of the house are, brick wood, function as extended outdoor rooms with materials such as, panels of and marble paving. one, between the residence and studio, plaster, plywood, asbestos, glass, the is situated beneath the overhang at and a pylon. the southern end of the residence. There Studio Space is a continuation of the metal roof, and rear wood paneled wall from interior to exterior, creating spatial and material continuity. Responding to the site, Charles and Ray had SUSTAINABILITY “fallen in love with the meadow,” in Ray’s words, and felt that the site required a different solution then what they had originally designed. Charles and Ray then set themselves a new problem...How to build a house that would: 1) Not destroy the meadow 2) “Maximize volume from minimal materials”. The Solution? Using the same off-the-shelf parts, but notably ordering one extra steel beam, Charles and Ray re-configured the House. The new design integrated the house into the landscape, rather than imposing the house on it. BIBLIOGRAPHY - Archdaily.com - Eames Foundation - Google images - National historic Landmark Nomtnation form -http://www.nps.gov/nhl/find/statelists/ca/Eames.pdf -“Case Study House [#8]: A House Designed and Built for the Magazine Arts & Architecture.” Arts & Architecture (July 1950): 26-39. -Eamesoffice.com; http://www.eamesoffice.com/the-work/eames-house- case-study-house-8/ -Eames Blog spot; http://w3eames.blogspot.ca/search/label/The%20Eames.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments
    Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments No. Name Address CHC No. CF No. Adopted Community Plan Area CD Notes 1 Leonis Adobe 23537 Calabasas Road 08/06/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 3 Woodland Hills - West Hills 2 Bolton Hall 10116 Commerce Avenue & 7157 08/06/1962 Sunland - Tujunga - Lake View 7 Valmont Street Terrace - Shadow Hills - East La Tuna Canyon 3 Plaza Church 535 North Main Street and 100-110 08/06/1962 Central City 14 La Iglesia de Nuestra Cesar Chavez Avenue Señora la Reina de Los Angeles (The Church of Our Lady the Queen of Angels) 4 Angel's Flight 4th Street & Hill Street 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Dismantled May 1969; Moved to Hill Street between 3rd Street and 4th Street, February 1996 5 The Salt Box 339 South Bunker Hill Avenue (Now 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Moved from 339 Hope Street) South Bunker Hill Avenue (now Hope Street) to Heritage Square; destroyed by fire 1969 6 Bradbury Building 300-310 South Broadway and 216- 09/21/1962 Central City 14 224 West 3rd Street 7 Romulo Pico Adobe (Rancho 10940 North Sepulveda Boulevard 09/21/1962 Mission Hills - Panorama City - 7 Romulo) North Hills 8 Foy House 1335-1341 1/2 Carroll Avenue 09/21/1962 Silver Lake - Echo Park - 1 Elysian Valley 9 Shadow Ranch House 22633 Vanowen Street 11/02/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 12 Woodland Hills - West Hills 10 Eagle Rock Eagle Rock View Drive, North 11/16/1962 Northeast Los Angeles 14 Figueroa (Terminus), 72-77 Patrician Way, and 7650-7694 Scholl Canyon Road 11 The Rochester (West Temple 1012 West Temple Street 01/04/1963 Westlake 1 Demolished February Apartments) 14, 1979 12 Hollyhock House 4800 Hollywood Boulevard 01/04/1963 Hollywood 13 13 Rocha House 2400 Shenandoah Street 01/28/1963 West Adams - Baldwin Hills - 10 Leimert City of Los Angeles May 5, 2021 Page 1 of 60 Department of City Planning No.
    [Show full text]
  • Vitra Accessories Collection Developed by Vitra in Switzerland Update: Maison & Objet, September 2017
    Vitra Accessories Collection Developed by Vitra in Switzerland Update: Maison & Objet, September 2017 The Vitra Accessories Collection encompasses the growing portfolio of design objects, accessories and textiles produced by the Swiss furniture company. The collection is based on classic patterns and objects conceived by designers such as Alexander Girard, Charles and Ray Eames and George Nelson. In addition to these classics, it also includes pieces by contemporary designers like Ronan and Erwan Bouroullec, Jasper Morrison, Hella Jongerius and Michel Charlot. Authenticity, joy and playfulness are hallmarks of the Vitra Accessories Collection. For the autumn / winter collection of 2017 Vitra will expand its accessories portfolio with design objects by Charles and Ray Eames, Alexander Girard and George Nelson. Charles & Ray Eames Charles and Ray Eames are among the most influential designers of the twentieth century. Working with tireless enthusiasm, the pair explored the fields of photography, film, architecture, exhibitions, and furniture and product design, making landmark contributions in each domain. Plywood Elephant & Eames Elephant (small), 1945 In the 1940s, Charles and Ray Eames spent several years developing and refining a technique for the three-dimensional moulding of plywood, creating a series of furniture items and sculptures in the process. Among these initial designs, the two-part elephant proved to be the most technically challenging due to its tight compound curves, and the piece never went into serial production. A prototype was given to Charles's 14-year-old daughter Lucia Eames and later borrowed for the exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art in New York in 1946. It still survives in the Eames family archives today.
    [Show full text]
  • After Seven Decades Strong, Good Design Continues Its Iconic History Awarding the Best and Most Recognized Design Products Worldwide
    MORE INFORMATION Jennifer Nyholm Chicago, Illinois USA [email protected] EUROPE CONTACTS: Fachanan Conlon Dublin, Ireland [email protected] AFTER SEVEN DECADES STRONG, GOOD DESIGN CONTINUES ITS ICONIC HISTORY AWARDING THE BEST AND MOST RECOGNIZED DESIGN PRODUCTS WORLDWIDE The Modern Design Revolution Persists in a Steady Loud and Showy Innovative Pace as It Did at the Offset of the 1950s. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS (MAY 25, 2020) — Seventy years ago, a group of die-hard advocates for modern design banded together to brand a novel marketing campaign to showcase and trumpet new American home furnishings, household items, and industrial objects with a revolutionary passion and zeal. Good Design® was founded in Chicago in 1950 by architects Charles and Ray Eames, Eero Saarinen, and Edgar Kaufmann, Jr., director of the Industrial Design Department, Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) and professor of Architecture and Art History at Columbia University with the first installation of Good Design at The Merchandise Mart in Chicago. The first Good Design exhibition was sponsored by The Merchandise Mart and The Museum of Modern Art, together with the Society of Industrial Designers, the American Institute of Decorators, the Home Furnishing Industry Committee, Neiman-Marcus, Lord & Taylor, The Art Institute of Chicago, and the American Institute of Architects. The Good Design exhibition opened at The Merchandise Mart on January 16, 1950 with the installation designed by Charles and Ray Eames. A reduced version of the exhibition, assembled by Eames, opened at MoMA in New York on November 21, 1950. This was the first time that a wholesale merchandising center and an art museum joined forces to present “the best new examples in modern design in home furnishings.” The program called for three shows a year: one during the Chicago winter furniture market in January, another coinciding with the June summer market in Chicago, and a November show in New York based on the previous two exhibitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation by Design: Archives and Records Services at Herman Miller, Inc
    Reprint: Business Archives Section Newsletter, 1998 Preservation by Design: Archives and Records Services at Herman Miller, Inc. By Robert W. Viol, Corporate Archivist, Herman Miller, Inc. Who is Herman Miller? Collections and Services departments. Space in the record Herman Miller Inc. is a leading Herman Miller’s corporate archival center has been designed to store multinational manufacturer of holdings have been described by requested documents and furniture, furniture systems and researchers as "awesome" - a accommodate lawyers from both furniture management services. testimonial to the corporate sides of the courtroom. Headquartered in Zeeland, officers, who have generously Michigan, Herman Miller has been provided monetary and moral Get Rid of that Backlog! It Costs a source of major innovation in the support, and to the dozens of men Us Money! residential and office and women, who have contributed Litigation research has environments. The company their effort, time and talent. The demonstrated the urgent need to emphasizes problem solving archives, now located in one of the eliminate the backlog of through design, participate company’s original buildings, uncataloged Herman Miller management, environmental documents the development of publications and non-Herman responsibility and employee stock Herman Miller product from its Miller materials containing third ownership. inception and creation to marketing party endorsements of our product. and distribution. Collections Every growing and viable archives Herman Miller, Inc. began in 1905 include publications, administrative will have a backlog of the as the Star Furniture Company, a records, photography, drawings unprocessed, however, when manufacturer of ornate and blueprints, oral histories, records or publications are reproductions of traditional-style audiovisuals, three dimensional requested as a result of a court home furniture.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rccaarchitecture California the Journal of the American Institute Of
    architecture california the journal of the american institute of architects california council a r cCA aiacc design awards issue 04.3 photo finish ❉ Silent Archives ❉ AIACC Member Photographs ❉ The Subject is Architecture arcCA 0 4 . 3 aiacc design a wards issue p h o t o f i n i s h Co n t e n t Tracking the Awards 8 Value of the 25 Year Award 10 ❉ Eric Naslund, FAIA Silent Archives: 14 In the Blind Spot of Modernism ❉ Pierluigi Serraino, Assoc. AIA AIACC Member Photographs 18 ❉ AIACC membership The Subject is Architecture 30 ❉ Ruth Keffer AIACC 2004 AWARDS 45 Maybeck Award: 48 Daniel Solomon, FAIA Firm of the Year Award: 52 Marmol Radziner and Associates Lifetime Achievement 56 Award: Donlyn Lyndon, FAIA ❉ Interviewed by John Parman Lifetime Achievement 60 Award: Daniel Dworsky, FAIA ❉ Interviewed by Christel Bivens Kanda Design Awards 64 Reflections on the Awards 85 Jury: Eric Naslund, FAIA, and Hugh Hardy, FAIA ❉ Interviewed by Kenneth Caldwell Savings By Design A w a r d s 88 Co m m e n t 03 Co n t r i b u t o r s 05 C r e d i t s 9 9 Co d a 1 0 0 1 arcCA 0 4 . 3 Editor Tim Culvahouse, AIA a r c C A is dedicated to providing a forum for the exchange of ideas among mem- bers, other architects and related disciplines on issues affecting California archi- Editorial Board Carol Shen, FAIA, Chair tecture. a r c C A is published quarterly and distributed to AIACC members as part of their membership dues.
    [Show full text]
  • Authentic Eames® Moulded Plastic Chairs from Herman Miller Now in a New, More Sustainable Fibreglass
    Authentic Eames® Moulded Plastic Chairs from Herman Miller now in a new, more sustainable fibreglass. Herman Miller also announces a proprietary take Perhaps more than any design, the Shell Chair represents the back program in support of fibreglass recycling. Eames’ disinterest in superficial aesthetics and their agnostic approach to material. What mattered most to them was the integrity of the form, function and context. The chair, in The Eames Shell Chair, created by Charles and Ray Eames for fibreglass, was introduced by Herman Miller in 1950 – its now Herman Miller, is perhaps the epitome of the celebrated couple’s familiar form already a result of several refinements – as the design process—a philosophy characterised by a journey of first mass-produced plastic chair. The iconic design continued exploration, evolution, insight and delight. True to this spirit, the to evolve through the years with new colors, height options, Herman Miller Collection, in collaboration with the Eames Office, base variations, and the application of upholstery. But by the continues to push the boundaries of the Shell Chair form, first late 1980s the environmental risk associated with fibreglass introducing a moulded wood version and now with an advanced, production was recognised, leading Ray and Herman Miller to sustainable fibreglass chemistry and production process. The discontinue its production until a more suitable material could be result is the Eames Moulded Fibreglass Chairs, available through found. In 2000, Herman Miller reintroduced the Moulded Plastic authorised Herman Miller dealers. Chair in polypropylene. This durable, 100% recyclable material proved popular, with a softer profile and subtle matte texture.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Photo Proof Pages
    F cover 42 summer14:ToC 4/9/14 12:30 PM Page 1 john entenza house 12 texas & florida updates 34, 60 the past perfected 46 SUMMER 2014 $6.95 us/can On sale until August 31, 2014 AtomicRanch 42 3/19/14 6:21 PM Page 1 AUDREY DINING made to order made in america made to last KYOTO DINING SOHO BEDROOM FUSION END TABLE Available near you at: California Benicia - Ironhorse Home Furnishings (707) 747-1383, Capitola - Hannah’s Home Furnishings (831) 462-3270, Long Beach - Metropolitan Living (562) 733-4030, Monterey - Europa Designs (831) 372-5044, San Diego - Lawrance Contemporary Furniture (800) 598-4605, San Francisco - Mscape (415) 543-1771, Santa Barbara - Michael Kate Interiors (805) 963-1411, Studio City - Bedfellows (818) 985-0500, Torrance - Contemporary Lifestyles (310) 214-2600, Thousand Oakes - PTS (805) 496-4804, Colorado Fort Collins - Forma Furniture (970) 204-9700, Connecticut New Haven - Fairhaven (203) 776-3099, District of Columbia Washington - Urban Essentials (202) 299-0640, Florida Sarasota - Copenhagen Imports (941) 923-2569, Georgia Atlanta - Direct Furniture (404) 477-0038, Illinois Chicago - Eurofurniture (800) 243-1955, Indiana Indianapolis - Houseworks (317) 578-7000, Iowa Cedar Falls - Home Interiors (319) 266-1501, Manitoba Winnipeg - Bella Moda (204) 783-4000, Maryland Columbia - Indoor Furniture (410) 381-7577, Massachusetts Acton - Circle Furniture (978) 263-7268, Boston - Circle Furniture (617) 778-0887, Cambridge - Circle Furniture (617) 876-3988, Danvers - Circle Furniture (978) 777-2690, Framingham - Circle
    [Show full text]
  • Eames House: a Precedent Study
    EAMES HOUSE: A PRECEDENT STUDY Lea Santano & Lauren Martin Table Of Contents LOCATED in the Pacific Palisades General Information THE EAMESES are best known for area of Los Angeles, California. The Eames their groundbreaking contributions to House is composed of a residence and architecture, furniture design, industrial studio overlooking the Pacific Ocean. design and manufacturing, and the photographic arts. “The Architect & The Painter” THE DESIGN is one of the few architectural works DESIGNED by Charles and Ray Eames, the original attributed to Charles Eames, and embodies many of design of the house was proposed by Charles and Ray the distinguishing characteristics and ideals of postwar as part of the famous Case Study House program for Modernism in the United States. John Entenza’s Arts & Architecture magazine. DATES OF SIGNIFIGANCE for THE EAMES HOUSE THE IDEA of a Case Study house was the Eames House coincide with the has been regarded as one of to hypothesize a modern household, residency of its designers, extending the most significant elaborate its functional requirements, have from 1949 until 1988. experiments in American an esteemed architect develop a design Other dates include 1978. domestic architecture. that met those requirements using modern materials and construction processes. SITE INFORMATION AND SPECIFICS PLANS/AXO/SECTIONS The Studio Bay Above is a picture of the original design of the Eames House. It was later adjusted to fit in with the The Resdiential Bay environment surrounding the property. The Eameses wanted to build something that worked with the site, not just something placed on top of it. This axonometric drawing breaks down the Case Study House concept and construction #8 of the Eames House.
    [Show full text]
  • Ational Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service AR ational Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register ofHistoric Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/ A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form I0-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name St. Mary's Catholic Church other names/site number Site #PH0171 2. Location street & number 123 Columbia D not for publication city or town Helena-West Helena D vicinity state Arkansas code AR county Phillips code 107 zip code 72342 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this 1:81 nomination 0 request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set for in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property 1:81 meets 0 does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant 0 nationally 1:81 statewide 0 locally.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Eames : Furniture from the Design Collection, the Museum of Modern Art, New York by Arthur Drexler
    Charles Eames : furniture from the design collection, the Museum of Modern Art, New York By Arthur Drexler Author Drexler, Arthur.;Museum of Modern Art (New York, N.Y.) Date 1973 Publisher The Museum of Modern Art ISBN 0870703145 Exhibition URL www.moma.org/calendar/exhibitions/1712 The Museum of Modern Art's exhibition history— from our founding in 1929 to the present—is available online. It includes exhibition catalogues, primary documents, installation views, and an index of participating artists. MoMA © 2017 The Museum of Modern Art CHARLESEAMES FURNITURE FROM THE DESIGN COLLECTION THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART, NEW YORK LIBRARY Museumof Mocfc-fnAft CHARLESEAMES FURNITURE FROM THE DESIGN COLLECTION THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART, NEW YORK BY ARTHUR DREXLER LIBRARY" iteaurn of Mod&rr Art mha DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN TRUSTEES OF THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART c. ^2 Arthur Drexler, Director William S. Paley, Chairman Emilio Ambasz, Curator of Design Gardner Cowles, Vice Chairman John Garrigan, Assistant Curator of Graphic Design Henry Allen Moe, Vice Chairman Mary Jane Lightbown, Research Associate David Rockefeller, Vice Chairman Kathryn Eno, Assistant to the Director Mrs. John D. Rockefeller 3rd, President Katherine Mansfield, Secretary J. Frederic Byers III, Vice President Jerry Bowen, Custodian Mrs. Bliss Parkinson, Vice President Ludwig Glaeser, Curator of the Mies van der Rohe James Thrall Soby, Vice President Archive Neal J. Farrell, Treasurer Susan Evens, Secretary Robert O. Anderson Carol Sullivan, Cataloguer Mrs. Douglas Auchcincloss Anny Eder, Conservator Walter Bareiss Margarete Hachigian, Researcher Robert R. Barker Alfred H. Barr, Jr.* COMMITTEE ON ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN Mrs. Armand P. Bartos William A.
    [Show full text]
  • EAMES HOUSE Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 EAMES HOUSE Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Eames House Other Name/Site Number: Case Study House #8 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 203 N Chautauqua Boulevard Not for publication: N/A City/Town: Pacific Palisades Vicinity: N/A State: California County: Los Angeles Code: 037 Zip Code: 90272 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: x Building(s): x Public-Local: _ District: Public-State: _ Site: Public-Federal: Structure: Object: Number of Resources within Property Contributing: Noncontributing: 2 buildings sites structures objects Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: None Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: N/A NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 EAMES HOUSE Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this __ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property __ meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. Signature of Certifying Official Date State or Federal Agency and Bureau In my opinion, the property __ meets __ does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Prefabrication and the Post-War House
    142 WITHOUT A HITCH: NEW DIRECTIONS IN PREFABRICATED ARCHITECTURE haps the most important, because it is the principal and most intimately connected with Prefabrication and the environmental conditioning of human beings, is everything we mean when we say the word Postwar House: the “HOUSE.” It is here that we come closest to California manifesto the heart of man’s existence; it is here that he hopes for the satisfaction of his most human needs; it is here that he strikes the firmest roots into the ground; it is here that he achieves his strongest sense of reality not only in terms of things but also in terms of fellow human beings. It is first then to “the house of man” that we must bring the abundant gifts of this age of science in the service of mankind, Matthew W. Fisher realizing that in the word “HOUSE” we encom- Iowa State University pass the full range of those activities and aspi- rations that make one man know all men as himself.”1 In July 1944, a year prior to the cessation of World War II, the California-based journal Arts and Architecture published what was in es- sence a manifesto on the “post-war house” and the opportunities and necessity for prefabrica- tion. This was largely the work of John En- tenza, publisher and editor of Arts and Archi- tecture since the late-Thirties, and his editorial assistants, Charles and Ray Eames, with sig- nificant contributions from Eero Saarinen and Buckminster Fuller, among others. Entenza and his editors were fully aware at the time of the pent-up demand for new housing that awaited the end of the war.
    [Show full text]