2000 Jaargang 99
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Scahier 74 Classicisme: Vredestempel, Prinsenhof, Haarlem
74 JAARGANG 23 n SEPTEMBER 2008 ClassicismeSC74.indd 2-3 14-9-2008 18:28:18 Vr e d e s ahier tempel PDF-versie Haarlem jaargang 23 1648 nummer 74 n september 2008 Classicisme verklaard aan de SCahier is sinds septem- ber 1985 een ongeregeld hand van een fietsenhok verschijnend schrift met essays, achtergronden, In 1648 werd in Haarlem op het Prinsenhof meningen en feiten over een Vredestempel gebouwd in een voor die tijd architectuur. Het is bedoeld uiterst moderne bouwstijl: het classicisme. Zo'n om de relaties van Ar- Vredestempel veertig jaar geleden werd dit vergeten prieeltje nog chitext op de hoogte te Sinds 1648 staat op het Haarlemse gebruikt als fietsenhok. houden over de fondslijst, Prinsenhof een ‘tempeltje’ gewijd Dit SCahier beschrijft uitvoerig de achtergronden de architectuurreizen en aan de Vrede van Munster. De van dit kleine bouwkundige sieraad. En passant Architectuurradio. achtergronden van een classicistisch wordt zo geschetst wat classicisme is en hoe het unicum. in de Republiek der Nederlanden ingang vond. Uitgeverij Architext Dat dit verhaal een sterk Haarlems karakter Klein Heiligland 91 Eerder verschenen: draagt, is niet toevallig: Haarlemmers speelden 2011 EE Haarlem SCahier 73 PDF over Retranchement (22 pagina’s), een vooraanstaande rol bij de introductie van e-post: [email protected] te importeren via www.architext.nl. de beginselen van de klassieke oudheid in het www.architext.nl bouwen. eindredactie: Ids Haagsma Inhoud: vormgeving: de IJsgarage s Haarlem Rob van Westreenen De tijd – pagina 5 © 2008 s Architext De plek – pagina 6 De maker (1) – pagina 11 De stijl – pagina 17 De Maker (2) – pagina 23 Het binnen – pagina 28 Rechts: de Vredestempel als fietsenhok, in de vorige jaren zestig. -
Simon Thurley, ‘Kensington Palace: an Incident in Anglo-Dutch Architectural Collaboration?’, the Georgian Group Journal, Vol
Simon Thurley, ‘Kensington Palace: an incident in Anglo-Dutch architectural collaboration?’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XVII, 2009, pp. 1–18 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2009 KENSINGTON PALACE: AN INCIDENT IN ANGLO-DUTCH ARCHITECTURAL COLLABORATION? SIMON THURLEY illiam III was brought up in what is often The second was after the death of Charles II in Wtermed the ‘Golden Age’ of Dutch culture, in when William and Mary became next in line to the a country whose intellectual and artistic singularity throne of England after James II. In this period and creativity were recognised across Europe. William’s court, such as it was, was swelled by He came, as King, to a country that Voltaire saw as English visitors and his palaces were enlarged and having made, since , ‘greater progress in all the made more magnificent, both to entertain them, and arts than in all preceding ages’, and having the to reflect his increased status. These bursts of cultural influence to create in Europe the ‘Age of the architectural activity were triggered by the practical English’. The marriage of the two cultures in the requirements of a prince, rather than being the result person of King William was surely to hold great of a love of building and architectural display such as things for the state of English architecture. Yet, in that which drove his grandparents. In Jacob van reality, the English king who spent more on building der Does wrote of William’s grandfather, Frederik than any other in the seventeenth century led court Hendrik, that he was ‘possessed by such a passion architecture into a cul-de-sac. -
Werkstuk Charles Julien; Oranjezaal Van Het Paleis Huis
Voor mijn vader i de inleiding 2 ii de hoofdpersonen 7 iii de meesters 11 Jacob van Campen 11 Constantijn Huygens 11 Salomon de Bray 12 Thomas Willeboirts Bosschaert 12 Jacob Jordaens 13 Adriaen Hanneman 13 Theodoor van Thulden 14 Caesar Pietersz. van Everdingen 14 Jan Lievens 15 Christiaen Gillisz. van Couwenbergh 16 de inhoud Gonzales Coques 16 Pieter de Grebber 17 Gerard Hermansz. van Honthorst 18 Pieter Claesz Soutman vi de werken 21 noordwand 22 Frederik Hendrik als heerser over de zeeën. 25 Deel van de triomfstoet met meegevoerd goud en zilver. 27 De Nederlandse maagd biedt Frederik Hendrik het opperbevel aan. 29 Deel van de triomfstoet met offerstier. 31 Dit boek werd speciaal vervaardigd in opdracht van Deel van de triomfstoet met olifant en schilderijen. 33 Simone Rijs voor het vak kunstbeschouwing van de Fontys Hogeschool voor de Kunsten te Tilburg Frederik Hendrik ontvangt de survivantie. 35 Deel van de triomfstoet met geschenken uit de Oost en de West. 37 december mmxii oostwand 39 Vormgeving Charles Julien Frederik Hendrik als triomfator. 41 Drukwerk Reclameland.nl Frederik Hendriks standvastigheid. 43 Bij het samenstellen van dit boek heb ik gebruik gemaakt van de informatie die te vinden is op internet en in boe- Deel van de triomfstoet. Amalia met haar dochters als toeschouwers van de triomf 45 ken/publikaties zoals aangegeven achterin het boek. Frederik Hendrik als krijgsman die het water beheerst. 47 De meeste van de gebruikte afbeeldingen komen uit het Allegorie op de tijd. 49 publiek domein van sites als wikipedia, maar ook van het Rijksmuseum, het archief van het RKD te ‘s Gravenhage zuidwand 51 en de KB te ‘s Gravenhage Alle mij bekende bronnen zijn vermeld. -
246 BOEKBESPREKING Jacob Van Campen, Schilder En Bouwmeester
BOEKBESPREKING for a forecourt. He also, to an extent that is hard to define, designed architecture for these patrons, and he must have served them much as Daniel Marot served their successors Jacob van Campen, schilder en bouwmeester 1595-1657. two generations later-designing and directing the execu- By P. T. A. Swillens. 302 pp. (19 figs.) Assen. tion of complex schemes of decoration and able to turn his hand to architecture as well. It was through his know- Ten years after Hendrik de Keyser's death in 1621 his ledge of architecture, however, that he first came to work colleague in the City Works of Amsterdam, the chief master for the Stadholder's circle (the Mauritshuis and Huygens' mason Cornelis Danckerts, published the first monograph house were mentioned by Anslo as early as 1648 as bearing on a Dutch architect, his Architectura moderna. Not all De witness to his architectural skill) and Huygens' resounding Keyser's works are included, but the picture that it gives and repeated praise was almost exclusively for his architec- is balanced, and it perceptively lays stress, even in its title, tural achievements: he was the 'vindicator of Vitruvius'. on a change in Dutch architecture which was heralded in it was he who 'admonished Gothic curly foolery with the De Keyser's works. The Haarlem painter and architect stately Roman, and drove old Heresy away before older Salomon de Bray wrote in the introduction: 'Our present Truth'. flourishing age, in which we see the true [i.e. Roman] Within three years of his first contact with the Stad- architecture as resurrected, gives the same to us so libe- holder's circle Van Campen was working for the city rally.. -
Country House in a Park Informal, Almost Wilderness Garden in This Painting Contains Architectural Elements Characteristic of C
different work because the Washington painting was sold by ile, 3rd Baron Savile [b. 1919], Rufford Abbey, Notting the Baron de Beurnonville only in 1881. hamshire; (sale, Christie, Manson & Woods, London, 18 2. The provenance given in Strohmer's 1943 catalogue of November 1938, no. 123); Rupert L. Joseph (d. 1959), New the Liechtenstein Collection and in the 1948 Lucerne exhibi York.1 tion catalogue contains misinformation. 3. See The Hague 1981, 34, and also Kuznetsov 1973, Exhibited: Jacob van Ruisdael, Mauritshuis, The Hague; Fogg 31-41. Art Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachu 4. Wright 1984, cat. 7. setts, 1981-1982, no. 54. 5. Landscape with a Footbridge (inv. no. 49.1.156) and Land scape with Bridge, Cattle, and Figures (inv. no. 29). DEPICTIONS of elegant country houses came into References vogue in the latter half of the seventeenth century as 1896 Bode: 99. 1903 Suida: 116. increasing numbers of wealthy Dutch merchants 1907- 1927 HdG, 4 (1912): 94, no. 295 129,no.407. built homes along the river Vecht and in other pic 1908 Hoss: 58, I.14, repro. turesque locations in the Netherlands. Artists who 1911 Preyer: 247-248. specialized in architectural painting, among them 1927 Kronfeld: 184-185, no. 911. Jan van der Heyden (q.v.), depicted the houses and 1928 Rosenberg: 87, no. 252. gardens in great detail. Surprisingly, however, not '943 Strohmer: 101, pi. 69. 1948 Lucerne: no. 175. all of these seemingly accurate representations por 1965 NGA: 119, no. 1637. tray actual structures; sometimes the scenes were 1968 NGA: 106, no. 1637. purely imaginary, intended to project an ideal of "975 NGA: 316-317, repro. -
The Design of the English Domestic Library in the Seventeenth Century: Readers and Their Book Rooms
The Design of the English Domestic Library in the Seventeenth Century: Readers and Their Book Rooms Lucy Gwynn Abstract The seventeenth century saw the increase in size of book collec- tions in private hands. Domestic library collections were becoming more visible as important adjuncts to the lives of their socially and culturally engaged owners. This article explores the ways in which the practical and intellectual problems of storing books were ad- dressed in the English home, through inventories and buildings accounts as well as contemporary literature. The changes in library furniture design over the course of the century are traced, together with the emergence of formal organizing systems such as catalogues and subject classification. Finally, the adoption of a different stylistic approach is examined. From Renaissance paintings of scholar saints like Jerome and Augustine to modern cinema’s portrayals of wizards and academics, the image of the private library has remained surprisingly consistent. The rooms belonging to Gandalf, Dumbledore, and John Dee (in Shekhar Kapur’s Elizabeth: the Golden Age), cluttered as they are with scientific instruments, taxidermy, and tottering piles of books, are striking in their resemblance to the humanist models represented by Carpaccio and Antonello da Messina. Bonnie Mak and Dora Thornton have demonstrated that the libraries of Renaissance Italy were as deliberately and artificially designed as their cinematic copies (Mak, 2002; Thornton, 1998). The books themselves be- came representative of their contents through their display, and the pres- ence of trompe l’oeil effects exaggerated the use of the study as a “theatri- cal space for self-exhibition” (Mak, 2002, p. -
Sir Roger Pratt's Library
Reading as a Gentleman and an Architect: Sir Roger Pratt’s Library by KIMBERLEY SKELTON This article illuminates the changes in English seventeenth-century architectural practice when members of the gentry educated themselves as architectural professionals and as a result several became noted practitioners. The author analyses the rarely examined notes and library of Sir Roger Pratt to explore how a seventeenth-century gentleman both studied and practised architecture literally as both gentleman and architect. Also she considers Pratt’s notes chronologically, rather than according to their previous thematic reorganisation by R. T. Gunther (1928), and offers a full reconstruction of Pratt’s library beyond Gunther’s catalogue of surviving volumes. Mid-seventeenth-century England experienced a sharp change in architectural practice and education. For the first time, members of the gentry began to design buildings and to educate themselves as professionals in architecture. From the late 1650s, Sir Roger Pratt designed country houses, and several members of the landed and educated classes became prominent architects: Sir Christopher Wren, Robert Hooke, Hugh May, William Winde, William Samwell, and William Talman. These gentleman architects brought new techniques to the study of architecture since they were more highly trained in analysing text than image. Scholars have yet to consider the seventeenth-century emergence of the gentleman architect in detail; they have focused more on monographic studies of architects, patronage, and building types than on shifts in the architectural profession.1 This article explores how a seventeenth-century gentleman would both study and practise architecture; it considers the rarely examined library and manuscript notes of Sir Roger Pratt.2 I argue that Pratt practised and read as literally patron and architect – using the techniques of a patron to answer the questions of an architect designing for English geographical and social particularities. -
Palladio, a Model for the Architecture of Classical Europe
Architectural Styles Palladio, a model for the architecture of classical Europe Jean POTEL ABSTRACT Beginning in the sixteenth century, European architecture—in the same manner as painting, sculpture, and more broadly all forms of artistic expression—fell into tune with an Italian art that had already been renewing itself for nearly a century on ancient models. While the Rome of Julius II (pontiff from 1503 to 1513) and his successors drew the attention of the majority of nations, such as the Holy Roman Empire and Spain, others such as England, the United Provinces, and more discreetly France were enthusiastic about the work of the Vicentine Andrea Palladio (1508-1580). While the productions of this contemporary of the painter Veronese were mostly limited to the secondary artistic centers of the continental territories of the Republic of Venice (modern-day Veneto), they were behind an architectural movement unique to the Old World, one that took its creator’s name and thereby attesting to the incredible success of his manner: Palladianism. Jacob van Campen (1595-1657), home of count Jean-Maurice de Nassau-Siegen, known as Mauritshuis, The Hague (the Netherlands), 1633-1644. Source : Wikimedia Commons. The Origins of Palladianism Born in Padua and long active in Vicenza, two cities dominated by Venice, Pietro della Gondola (1508-1580) had an exceptional career. A mason by formation, he befriended the humanists Giorgio Trissino (1478-1550), who renamed him Palladio, and Daniele Barbaro (1514-70), whom he assisted in the latter’s commented translation of Vitruvius’s treatise on Latin architecture (1556), two encounters that were behind the extraordinary esthetic and conceptual revolution of his art. -
DANIEL STALPAERT DOOR A. W. WEISSMAN. LS Dr. GEORG
DANIEL STALPAERT DOOR A. W. WEISSMAN. LS Dr. GEORG GALLAND in zijn "Geschichte der Holl?n- dischen Baukunst", welke in 18go verscheen, JACOB VAN CAMPEN en zijn werken bespreekt, dan zegt hij, aan het Stadhuis van Amsterdam gekomen: "Verschwie- gen darf nicht werden, dass die Gleichmdssigkeit der architektonischen Gestaltung, mit welcher dieser viel- gefeierte Zeitgenosse REMBRANDTS seine Kiinstlerphan- tasie kompromittiert hat, doch nicht durch das Vorbild der Antike entschuldbar ist. Und welche tüchtigen Mitarbeiter kamen dabei der Schöpfung zu gute: DANIEL STALPAERT, BOSBOOM und der unvergleichliche ARTUS QUELLINUS." Het ongunstig oordeel over "'s Werelds Achtste Wonder" hetwelk de Duitsche schrijver hier velt, is door anderen, een kwart eeuw geleden, vaak herhaald. Tegenwoordig erkent men algemeen, dat de beoordeelaars van toen geen juisten maatstaf hebben aangelegd. Ook het oordeel over de medewerkers van VAN CAMPEN, DANIEL STALPAERT en SYMON BOSBOOM, eischt herziening. In dit tiidschrift heb ik vroeger reeds uit de stukken aangetoond, dat niet aan SYMON BOSBOOM, die een onbeteekenend 66 man is geweest, maar aan zijn voorganger als stadssteenhouwer, de geniale WILLEM DE KEYSER, de eer toekomt VAN CAMPENS rechterhand bij de uitvoering van het Stadhuis geweest te zijn. Dat ook DANIEL STALPAERT ver boven zijn waarde door tijdgenoot en nageslacht is geschat hoop ik in de volgende regelen te bewijzen. Omstreeks 1560 woonde te Brussel een tapijtwerker JEREMYAS STALPAERT, die later naar Delft verhuisde, waar hij in 1623 nog woonachtig was. Immers in een acte, den 29 December 1623 verleden voor den notaris ADRIAEN RI JSHOECh, verklaart: "JEREMYAS STALPERT, tapitserijwercker, te out te sijn, omme sijn hantwerck meer te connen verrichten." JEREMYAS STALPAERT had een zoon PIETER, die in 1599 te Amsterdam woonde. -
'X'marks the Spot: the History and Historiography of Coleshill House
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Department of History ‘X’ Marks the Spot: The History and Historiography of Coleshill House, Berkshire by Karen Fielder Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2012 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Doctor of Philosophy ‘X’ MARKS THE SPOT: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIOGRAPHY OF COLESHILL HOUSE, BERKSHIRE by Karen Fielder Coleshill House was a much admired seventeenth-century country house which the architectural historian John Summerson referred to as ‘a statement of the utmost value to British architecture’. Following a disastrous fire in September 1952 the remains of the house were demolished amidst much controversy shortly before the Coleshill estate including the house were due to pass to the National Trust. The editor of The Connoisseur, L.G.G. Ramsey, published a piece in the magazine in 1953 lamenting the loss of what he described as ‘the most important and significant single house in England’. ‘Now’, he wrote, ‘only X marks the spot where Coleshill once stood’. Visiting the site of the house today on the Trust’s Coleshill estate there remains a palpable sense of the absent building. This thesis engages with the house that continues to exist in the realm of the imagination, and asks how Coleshill is brought to mind not simply through the visual signals that remain on the estate, but also through the mental reckoning resulting from what we know and understand of the house. In particular, this project explores the complexities of how the idea of Coleshill as a canonical work in British architectural histories was created and sustained over time. -
Working with Building Preservation Trusts Build Renew Restores Restore
Institute of Historic Building Conservation No 114 May 2010 Working with building preservation trusts Build Renew Restores Restore From cathedrals and abbeys to small churches and chapels. From stately homes and royal palaces to small houses and cottages. For historic buildings across Britain, Linford-Bridgeman is the contractor of choice for repair, restoration and conservation. For more information about Linford-Bridgeman, find us at: www.linfordrestores.com, or call 01543 414 234 Compton Verney, Warwickshire. RIBA Award 2004. Linford-Bridgeman Ltd, Quonians, Lichfield, Staffordshire WS13 7LB Tel: 01543 414 234 Fax: 01543 258 250 [email protected] www.linford.com LINFORD SPECIALIST WORKS Linford Masonry • Dorothea Restorations • Trumpers • Linford Joinery Stonemasonry • Architectural Metalwork • Traditional Plastering • Fine Joinery Linford Specialist Works brings together Linford Group's renowned stable of craft companies to Linford Specialist Works provide a unique service for the property owners, architects and specialist contractors A division of Linford Group concerned with the care of traditional and heritage buildings. Quonians, Lichfield, Our skilled and directly-employed teams can be contracted individually or in combination for projects of Staffordshire WS13 7LB all sizes across the UK. By helping our clients to source multiple craft services from a single organisation, [email protected] www.linfordSW.com we can deliver outstanding craft quality alongside savings in client time and money. For more information about Linford Specialist Works, please visit www.linfordSW.com, or call us on 01543 414 234 today. ii CONTEXT 1 1 4 : MAY 2 0 1 0 Context IHBC comment on PPS5 2 New life for Portaferry Briefing 5 Nick Brown 34 Out of Context 6 Partnership at Oxford Castle Debbie Dance 37 Letters 6 The Vivat Trust’s special buildings www.ihbc.org.uk The writer’s voice 7 Laura Norris 40 Registered as a Charity Number 1061593. -
Alex Echlin, 'Like Father Like Son: the Architectural Patronage of Andrew Fountaine Sr.', the Georgian Group Journal, Vol. X
Alex Echlin, ‘Like father like son: The architectural patronage of Andrew Fountaine Sr.’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XXV, 2017, pp. 37–52 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2017 LIKE FATHER LIKE SON: THE ARCHITECTURAL PATRONAGE OF ANDREW FOUNTAINE SR. ALEXANDER ECHLIN Narford Hall, Norfolk, is at once one of England’s destroyed in 1891, has received scant attention from most architecturally significant houses, yet also one of architectural historians. Yet the design of Brookmans its most mysterious. Chief amongst these mysteries is casts an interesting light on that of Narford. Here the identity of the architect of the house commissioned I outline the evidence relating to the building of at the start of the eighteenth century by Andrew Brookmans Park and argue that it shows that Andrew Fountaine Sr. (1634 – 1707). In this article I show that Fountaine Sr. was a man with a close interest in Narford Hall was not the only house to have been built architecture and, more speculatively, that he may by Fountaine. Brookmans Park, Hertfordshire, was have been an amateur architect. erected to his commission in the 1680s. This house, Fig. 1: Narford Hall, Norfolk, engraving by E. Roberts, from T. Cromwell, Excursions through Norfolk, volume II, (London, 1819); the house built by Andrew Fountaine Sr. from 1702, surrounded by later alterations, consists of the central, pedimented three bays and the two bays on either side. (© Alec Barr) THE GEORGIAN GROUP JOURNAL VOLUME XXV LIKE FATHER LIKE SON : THE ARCHITECTURAL PATRONAGE OF ANDREW FOUNTAINE SR . n last year’s Georgian Group Journal, William have been built by Andrew Fountaine Sr., who had IKelley and I presented a new attribution to Sir commissioned Brookmans Park, Hertfordshire, Andrew Fountaine (1676–1753) of Narford Hall.1 The in the 1680s.3 Architectural historians have largely purpose of the present article is to draw attention ignored Brookmans ever since its destruction by to the architectural patronage of Sir Andrew fire in 1891.