Annual Report 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Relationships Between International Sport Federations and International Disability Sport
Relationships Between International Sport Federations and International Disability Sport Northeastern University’s Center for the Study of Sport in Society Disability in Sport www.sportinsociety.org Introduction Sport opportunities for people with disabilities worldwide have traditionally been organized by disability rather than sport. International governing bodies for sport for people with disabilities include organizations such as the International Committee for Deaflympics (CISS) for the deaf, Special Olympics International for persons with intellectual disabilities and the International Paralympic Committee traditionally for persons with physical disabilities and since 1992 also for persons with intellectual disabilities. The histories of CISS, SOI and IPC are unique and in many respects more dissimilar than similar. What they do have in common is the reason for their creation: to offer opportunities in a segregated setting that were not being met by the able bodied sport system. Organizational Histories Paralympic sport began in the 1950s with a desire to re-integrate persons with disabilities into mainstream society and for over fifty years this issue has held a significant place within disability sport’s growth and development. Sir Ludwig Guttmann included sport and recreation into his rehabilitation programs at the Stoke Mandeville Rehabilitation hospital precisely to encourage the inclusion of war veterans into mainstream society and it was the games that he held that became the genesis for the Paralympic Games. The International Olympic Committee has signed two agreements with IPC confirming IOC financial and organizational support for the IPC and securing and protecting the organization of the Paralympic Games (Hums, Wolff & Legg, 2003). Special Olympics began in 1968 when Eunice Kennedy Shriver organized the First International Special Olympics Games in Chicago. -
EXAMINING the POLITICS and POLICY IMPACTS Yuna C. Kim A
HARM REDUCTION AND SUBSTANCE USE: EXAMINING THE POLITICS AND POLICY IMPACTS Yuna C. Kim A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Public Policy. Chapel Hill 2016 Approved by: Krista M. Perreira Christine P. Durrance Daniel P. Gitterman Jeremy G. Moulton Jonathan Oberlander © 2016 Yuna C. Kim ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Yuna C. Kim: Harm Reduction and Substance Use: Examining the Politics and Policy Impacts (Under the direction of Krista M. Perreira) This dissertation evaluates the impacts and political dynamics of harm reduction policies concerning substance use in North America. In doing so, this three-essay dissertation focuses on two substance use policies: medical marijuana laws (MMLs) and supervised injection services (SISs). The first two essays evaluate the unintended impacts that result from the implementation of MMLs in the U.S. The first essay evaluates the impact of state-level MML implementation and specific policy dimensions (i.e., dispensaries, patient registries, and in-home cultivation) in the U.S. on non-drug related arrest rates and crime rates for violent and property crimes. The second essay analyzes the effect of each MML policy dimension on the probability of cigarette smoking among U.S. adults. Considered together, these two essays highlight various unintended downstream impacts that need to be taken into consideration as policymakers adopt and implement MMLs. The third essay is a political evaluation of the barriers to adopting SISs in North America. The dearth of SISs in North America is puzzling considering the wealth of evidence suggesting their effectiveness in preventing overdoses and connecting injection drug users with treatment resources. -
Elite Sports for Persons With
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OLYMPICS PARALYMPICS Elite sports for persons with a disability – principally a physical or sensory Olympic-type sports for disability persons who are classified as having an intellectual Impairment Classifications disability. Olympic sports for elite = Athletes with Cerebral sportspeople Palsy (CPISRA), Athletes Athletes may also have a with Spinal Cord Lesion, physical disability, but first Spina Bifida and Polio classification = ID (ISMWSF), Athletes with Blindness (IBSA) and Athletes with Les Autres or Amputations (ISOD) Athletes of all ages are catered for: Minimum age for entering Age of athletes vary Age of athletes vary competition = 8 yrs according to sport, but few according to sport but few very young or old athletes young or older athletes NO upper limit – in 1987 there was a 70+ yr old Swedish Level I artistic gymnast All ability groups are Elite athletes only – entry Elite athletes only – entry included in the sports standards standards competition Year-Round Training and Year-Round Training and Centralized training prior to Competition Competition competition Every athlete receives Only first three are Only first three are recognition for all events recognized recognized SPECIAL OLYMPICS OLYMPICS PARALYMPICS Some events have been Some events have been Regular standardized adapted to meet ability adapted to meet ability competition levels of athletes levels of athletes Summer and Winter World Summer and Winter Games every 4 years – Olympic Games every 4 Summer Paralympic years – Games one month after First International Summer Olympic Games – begun in Games in 1968, Chicago, First Modern Olympics held 1988 after Seoul Olympic USA; First International in 1896, in Athens, Greece; Games Winter Games in 1977, Winter Olympic Games in Colorado, USA Chamonix, France in 1924 Independent organization Government supported Government supported and structure Competition Levels: - School- Local, State, National, Regional International Only Area/District and International - State/Province, National - Regional, International . -
Special Olympics Massachusetts Program Policies & Practices Table
PROGRAM POLICIES & PRACTICES HANDBOOK Revised October 2012 SPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS PROGRAM POLICIES & PRACTICES TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 5 A. SOMA Philosophy ..................................................................................................... 6 B. SOMA Mission Statement ......................................................................................... 6 C. SOMA Vision Statement ........................................................................................... 6 D. SOMA Key Principles ................................................................................................ 6 E. SOMA Values ............................................................................................................ 7 II. ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................................ 8 A. SOMA Organizational Chart .................................................................................... 9 B. Section Map ............................................................................................................ 11 III. LOCAL PROGRAMS........................................................................................................... 13 A. Definition of Local Program .................................................................................... 14 B. Local Programs Financial Guidelines ..................................................................... -
Table of Contents
Table of Contents Formal Submissions E Electricity Distributors Association Organization Name Enbridge Gas Distribution A Enniskillen Environmental Association Enniskillen Township Association of Municipalities of Ontario Enwin Utilities Association of Power Producers of Ontario Association to Protect Amherst Island H Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh Residents’ Group H.A.R.M. B (sub-group of Central Bruce Grey Wind Concerns) BayNiche Conservancy Biogas Association I Bruce Peninsula Wind Turbine Action Group Innergex Renewable Energy Inc. C International Association for Public Participation IPC Energy White Paper on Large FIT Procurement C4CA Canadian Nuclear Association K Canadian Solar Industries Association Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario King Township Canadian Wind Energy Association L Cavan Monaghan Township Central Bruce-Grey Wind Concerns Ontario Lake Superior Action Research Conservation Chartwell-Maple Grove Residents Association Legacy Holsteins City of Barrie City of Burlington M City of Guelph City of Kawartha Lakes Mississauga Residents’ Associations Network City of Toronto and Toronto Hydro Multi Municipal Wind Turbine Working Group Common Voice Northwest Energy Task Force Municipality of Grey Highlands County Coalition for Safe and Municipality of Kincardine Appropriate Green Energy Municipality of North Perth Municipality of Northern Bruce Peninsula D N Durham Region Natural Resources Canada NextEra Energy Niagara Region Northland Power NRStor Ontario Dialogue on Regional Planning and Siting Large Energy Infrastructure A Discussion about Energy Planning & Infrastructure Siting in Ontario Follow-Up Meeting with C4CA, CHIP and MIRANET and OPA & IESO Nancy Robertson, Frank Clegg, Lee Battiston Pauline Watson, Susan Hyatt, Dr. Boyd Upper July 29, 2013 Oakville/Mississauga We support (7 and 10) We strongly support community engagement in Municipal and Regional electricity planning •It has to be meaningful and substantive and involve the right people with appropriate resource support. -
USA Games Advancement Criteria
Supplemental Document to Athlete Nomination Criteria Introduction: Once every 4 years, Special Olympics athletes in the United States are provided the opportunity to represent our country at the highest level of competition - World Games (respectively for Summer & Winter Games)! Undoubtedly, one of the highest levels of privilege and opportunity for any Special Olympics athlete. In theory we would like to believe that consideration for selection for a World Games event should be afforded to every Special Olympics athlete. However due to many factors and considerations there is a need to better “screen” athletes who are selected to ensure that each athlete, coach, management team member and volunteer can achieve the best experience possible. Factors/considerations that make the World Games experience not only unique but challenging; • Length of Games – the World Games experience can involve anywhere from 18-21 days. The length of time required depends on the location of the Games and the pre-Games experience. For many Special Olympics athletes, this length of time away from home can prove to be a challenge. • Time Away from Parents/Family – Because of the structure of the U.S. Team, athletes chosen can expect to be away from their families for extended periods of time without seeing them and at times, with very limited contact. For some athletes this can cause stress and anxiety. • Adjusting to New Coaches – Coaches selected for the U.S. Team come from all across the country and it is rare for a World Games athlete to already know one of these coaches. Can the athlete adapt to a new coach? • Conform to the Group/Adaptability – In order for the U.S. -
Focus on Finance Victor Fedeli, Mpp Official Opposition Finance Critic
A little bit about Victor Fedeli ... Victor Fedeli is a life-long entrepreneur, specializing in communications. He opened his first company in 1978 and grew the firm into a wildly-successful full-service marketing company. In 1989, his Fedeli Corporation was named 34th in the 50 Best Places to Work in Canada! In 2003, Vic successfully ran for Mayor of the City of North Bay, and served two terms. Few people get an opportunity to re-shape a City, and Vic took great advantage of his opportunity while Mayor. Simply put, he and his wonderful team of Councillors restored hope and restored solvency. In 2011 Vic was elected as MPP for Nipissing. He was named Official Opposition Energy Critic, eventually heading up the Gas Plant Scandal Hearings. After serving two years, he was named Finance Critic. FOCUS ON FINANCE 4 In this role, Vic began publishing Fedeli Focus on Finance, a monthly series of newsletters offering an in-depth look into the finances of Ontario. His shocking revelations – through once-confidential internal government documents released in the Gas Plant Scandal Hearings – are what prompted the writing of the first Focus book. As witnessed throughout the pages of this 4th book, the documents are still revealing startling facts about the inner workings of the government. | A LOOK INTO ONTARIO’S FINANCES MPP Victor Fedeli joins Official Opposition Leader Patrick Brown in the Queen’s Park Media Studio, as Patrick answers a reporter’s question. FOCUS ON FINANCE VICTOR FEDELI A LOOK INTO ONTARIO’S FINANCES May 2017 VICTOR FEDELI, MPP OFFICIAL OPPOSITION FINANCE CRITIC 4 FOCUS ON FINANCE A LOOK INTO ONTARIO’S FINANCES VICTOR FEDELI, MPP OFFICIAL OPPOSITION FINANCE CRITIC 4ISBN: 978-0-9739509-6-0 FOCUS ON FINANCE A LOOK INTO ONTARIO’S FINANCES Preface ...............................................................................................................................4....... -
CHAPTER-4 Physical Education and Sports for CWSN
CHAPTER-4 Physical Education and Sports for CWSN (Children with Special Needs) 4.1 AIMS & OBJECTIVES OF ADAPTED PHYSICAL EDUCATION Adapted Physical Education is a science of developing, implementing, and monitoring a designed physical education instructional programme for an individual with a disability, based on a comprehensive assessment, to give the learner the skills necessary for a lifetime of rich recreation, leisure and sport experiences to increase physical fitness and wellness. Adapted physical education is physical education that is individualized and specially designed to address the needs of students with disabilities who require adaptations or modifications to be physically active, participate safely, and make progress toward the standards for Health, Safety, and Physical Education. In simple words, we can say the physical education program designed for individuals with disabilities is called adapted physical education. The program is adapted to meet the needs of each student through modifications and accommodations. According to Auxter, D., Pyfer, J. & Huettig, C. “ Adapted physical education is the art and science of developing and implementing a carefully designed physical education instructional program for an individual with a disability, based on a comprehensive assessment, to give the individual the skills necessary for a lifetime of rich leisure, recreation, and sport experiences”. Adapted physical education is used to emphasise the importance of understanding the scientific bases of human development as it bring into relations to teaching appropriate concepts and practices in the adapted physical education program which will serve to maximize the quality of life among individuals with disabilities. Adapted physical education is clear that practices that influencing exercise, fitness, diet and nutritional status can significantly impact the quality and duration of life of an individuals with disabilities. -
Working Paper: Do Not Cite Or Quote Without Permission Competing
Working Paper: Do Not Cite or Quote without Permission Competing Paradigms, Policy Windows and the Search for Sustainability in Ontario Electricity Policy. Mark Winfield and Becky MacWhirter Faculty of Environmental Studies York University, Toronto Canada The design and role of Ontario’s electricity system have been central elements of debates about the province’s economy and environment since the system’s origins at the beginning of the Twentieth Century. Although electricity accounts for only one quarter of the province’s total energy consumption, questions around the generation, distribution and conservation of electrical energy dominate the Ontario’s energy policy discourse (Joshi, 2012). The scale of Ontario’s electricity system is substantial. The province plans expenditures in the range of $87 billion over the next thirty years on its maintenance and expansion (Ministry of Energy, 2010), a level of investment comparable to that anticipated in the development of Alberta’s oil sands.1 The consequences of the decisions made about the Ontario system’s direction are of no less economic, social and environmental importance to Canada’s future.2 For the first seventy years of their existence, the institutions and policies that defined the province’s electricity system operated in an environment of relative stability. In contrast, the past three decades have been characterized by growing instability. Since the late 1970s Ontario has moved through a succession of apparently contradictory policy models: supply planning; “soft” energy paths and integrated resource planning; a “market” model; a “hybrid” model combining market and planning elements; a renewable energy paradigm centred around the 2009 Green Energy and Green 1 The Government of Alberta currently estimates domestic and international investment commitments to the oil sands in the range of $100 billion (Alberta, 2012) 2 Total installed generating capacity in Ontario as of 2011 was 35,858MW. -
Special Olympics Research Overview
Special Olympics Research Overview 94% of Special Olympics athletes reported improved sports skills. More than 5.7 million 97% of Unified Special Olympics Children ages 2-7 experienced a teammates athletes without compete across of high school seniors say that disabilities 7 month gain reported in motor skills after participation in an Unified Champion 172 schools is changing increased countries, 8-week Young Athletes program. their school for the understanding of averaging better people with intellectual 298 disabilities. competitions each day around the world. 65% of of healthcare Special Olympics' parents providers felt brand ranks highly in felt that participation in better prepared to Special Olympics had raised treat people with their expectations of their intellectual familiarity sons and daughters. and disabilities. favorability ratings. Over half of athletes’ siblings in the United States felt that participation in Special Olympics brought their family closer together. Table of Contents Special Olympics Attitudes Research .................................................................................. 5 Why Attitudes? ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Public Attitudes Toward People with Intellectual Disabilities .........................................................6 Changing Attitudes through Special Olympics .................................................................................. 9 Key Findings: Special Olympics -
ICU Strategic Plan 2019-2020:2021
INTERNATIONAL CHEER UNION (ICU) STRATEGIC PLAN* 2019-2020/2021 *Enclosed is the ICU Strategic Plan for 2019-2020 as communicated to ICU member Federations in 2019; however, despite challenges posed by the COVID pandemic in 2020, this is an ongoing Strategic Plan that will be in affect for 2021 and beyond with expected minor modifications to be implemented as the world emerges from the COVID pandemic. A few notables of 2020 have been added; and (even if not fully decribed herein) portions of the 2019-2020 Strategic Plan have already been converted to virtual platforms where possible I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / TABLE OF CONTENTS As discussed in the 2019 ICU Committee Meetings, National Federation breakout meetings, Administrative, Executive Council, Governing Council - and as presented to the General Assembly by ICU President Jeff Webb; enclosed please find the following ICU Strategic Plan (the “Plan”) detailed herein for 2019 – 2020. I. Executive Summary (includes “Table of Contents”) II. Strategic Objectives III. Strategic Initiatives (“Projects”) IV. Strategic Plan Summary The Plan is intended to guide the ICU organization, as well as assist ICU’s National Cheer Federation (NF) Members with their local strategic and development planning in promotion of our Sport for the benefit of Athletes around the world. II. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES As the basis for guiding the actions (Strategic Initiatives /“Projects”) of the ICU organization and National Federation members, the ICU has defined its Strategic Objectives (for 2019-2020 and beyond) as the following: 1. To remain forever vigilant and focused on the Safety for our Athletes (ICU’s Top Priority) 2. To assist National Federations to build the sport within the respective countries, as well as supporting them in their efforts to be recognized by their NOC’s and sport ministries 3. -
2017-18 Texas Tech Men's Basketball Record Book
2017-18 TEXAS TECH MEN’S BASKETBALL RECORD BOOK • @TEXASTECHMBB • #WRECKEM • #4TO1 PAGE 1 TEXAS TECH • ALL-TIME LETTERMAN LIST Coffman, Drew 2004-05-06 Jennings, Bubba 1981-82•RS-83-84-85 —A— Cohadarevic, Darko 2009-10 —G— Jennings, Grady 1930 Adams, Luke 2012-13-14-15 Garrett, Authur “Judge” 1935-36-37 Collins, Chad 1992-93-94-95 Jennings, Leslie 1927-28 Akin, Dudley 1938 Garrison, Samuel “Slim” 1938 Cook, Marshall 1934 Johnson, Charles 1982-83 Alderson, Jack 1950-51-52 Gaskin, Olen 1936 Cook, Trevor 2008-09 Johnson, David 1970-71-72 Allen, George 1941-42-43 Gay, Sean 1986-87-88-89 Cooper, Dale 1944 Johnson, James 1988-89-90 Anderson, Quentin 1982-83-84-85 Gee, J.T. 1929 Cooper, Gionet 1994-95-96-97 Johnson, Miles 1967-68 Andis, Bob 1941 Gentry, Allen 1939 Cooper, Paul 2011 Johnson, Tom 1957 Apple, Don 1958-59 Geron, Alvin “Jake” 1939-40-41 Cope, Bill 1945 Johnson, Virgil 1951-52-53 Arenas, Jesus 2002 Gibson, Eugene 1946-47-48-49-50 Coppage, Glenn 1928-29 Johnson, William 1973-74-75 Armstrong, Don 1980 Gibson, Sterling 1956-57 Corbin, Dan 1936 Jones, Deuce 1996-97 Arrington, Gene 1958-59-60 Gilbreath, Byron 1941-42 Cox, Norman 1941-42-43 Jones, Zach 2011 Artis, Maurice 1988-89 Craig, Rogdrick 2008-09 Giles, Devonne 2004-05 Ashley, Damon 1992-93 Crawford, Jerry 1945 Gilley, Gabe 1939-40-41-42 Austin, Allen 1991-92-93 Craver, Athol 1946 Gilley, T.L. 1939-40 —K— Averil, Gracen 1997 Crews, Alvin 1931-32-33-34 Gilmore, Wilson 1933-34-35 Kaberline, Gene 1971-72-73 Crews, Leroy 1934-35, 1937 Gindorf, Bobby 1961-62-63 Keller, Kenny 1986•RS-87-88 Crews, Walter 1947 Glover, Bob 1966 Kelley, Bill 1936 —B— Crockett, Jaye 2010•RS-11-12-13-14 Gooden, Mike 1962-63-64 Kelley, Bill 1945-46 Bailey, Phil 1973-74-75 Crowe, Greg 1985-86-87-88 Gotcher, Toddrick 2012•RS-13-14-15-16 Kelley, Larry 1985, 1987 Bailey, Stacy 1991-92 Cummings, Logan 1956-57 Graham, Tyree 2009 Kelsey, Cecil 1930 Bain, T.F.