DOCSLIB.ORG

TAFISA Bulletin 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TAFISA Bulletin 2013 The Association For Greetings from TAFISA International Sport for All the President Bulletin 2013 Frankfurt/Main, Germany, January 2014 Editor: TAFISA e.V. The global Sport for All movement is growing rapidly, and TAFISA Timeline Sustainable Sport for All attracting increasing attention as a vital vein in 2013 combatting many of the world’s most difficult January for a Sustainable Active World and complex problems. Those already • Launch of EU-funded TAFISA SportCityNet involved in the movement understand the Project, 1st positive effects to the individual, community • Global Conference on Traditional Physical Cultures, Sports and Games, Amravati (Maharashtra), India, and wider society that Sport for All and 14th – 18th physical activity bring – to physical, mental • “TAFISA/UNESCO Expert Group on TSG first and social well-being alike. However our work meeting, Amravati (Maharashtra), India, 16th February is not done. Far too many continue to lead • TAFISA National CLC, Tehran, Iran, 2nd – 8th inactive lifestyles, and, what is worse, inflict March these poor habits onto younger generations. • TAFISA SportCityNet first project meeting, TAFISA is one organisation working toward Wiesbaden, Germany, 15th – 17th breaking this vicious cycle. April • TAFISA Board Meeting, Enschede, Netherlands, 5th – 7th With the adoption of Designed To Move as • CANOC/TO2015 Sport for All Conference TAFISA’s primary physical activity platform, supported by TAFISA, Haiti, 7th – 10th the election of a new and highly capable Board • TAFISA National CLC, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, 12th – 17th of Directors, and the support of our members, • TAFISA Triple AC Workshop, Lima, Peru, TAFISA is optimistic about 2014 and beyond. 23rd – 24th, as satellite to: Contained within this bulletin are examples of • 15th IOC World Conference on Sport for All, Lima, Peru, 24th – 27th all that TAFISA is doing to promote the global Opening Ceremony of the 23rd TAFISA World Congress 2013, Enschede, Netherlands / © Roy Linthorst May Sport for All and physical activity movement. • TAFISA National CLC, Astana, Kazakhstan, Sustainability is at the very core of Sport for the natural environment and use of renewable You can read about our practical programs, for 21st – 25th All and physical activity (SAPA). It is a key resources. Of course, environmental example WCD and WWD, our commitment • TAFISA World Challenge Day, Worldwide, 29th • 5th International Conference of Ministers and Senior element and cornerstone of any successful sustainability is critical, however it is but a to member development through CLCs and Officials Responsible for Education and Sport, and enduring Sport for All program or policy. small piece of a global puzzle with many faces Reach Out Days, our recognition of members’ Berlin, Germany, 28th – 30th However, in the rush to deliver programs and complexities, including Sport for All achievements through our Awards Scheme and August and the fight to create popular policy and and physical activity. We must explore and Triple AC program, and our strengthening of • TAFISA – DTM Workshop, United Kingdom, 10th – 11th maintain power, sustainability is often promote both sustainable participation in the global Sport for All network via World October overlooked by shortsighted governments SAPA, and also how SAPA can impact and Congresses and Games. However, none of this • TAFISA World Walking Day, Worldwide, 5th – 6th and SAPA organisations alike. The time is aid global sustainability in a broader context. would be possible without the ongoing and • TAFISA SportCityNet second meeting, Enschede, ripe for us all, as leaders of the Global SAPA generous support of our members, stakeholders Netherlands, 22nd – 23rd • 23rd TAFISA World Congress, Enschede, Movement, to recognise and reinforce the So what does sustainability mean? How and partners. On behalf of the TAFISA Board Netherlands, 23rd – 27th critical importance of sustainability in Sport does this affect SAPA? How can we use of Directors, I thank you all sincerely, and • TAFISA Board Meeting, Enschede, for All and physical activity. sustainability to benefit SAPA, and in turn know that together we will reach our ultimate Netherlands, 23rd • TAFISA Europe Meeting, Enschede, create a more active, sustainable world? goal of an Active World. Netherlands, 23rd Sustainability is a ‘buzz word’ touted as a key More than 400 participants in the TAFISA • ASFAA General Assembly and Board Meeting, value by governments and organisations across 23rd World Congress 2013 responded to Enschede, Netherlands, 23rd • TAFISA Martial Arts Workshop, Enschede, the world, however with little understanding these critical questions in Enschede, the Netherlands, 23rd of its true meaning and consequences. Netherlands. Prof. Ju-Ho Chang, • TAFISA Jürgen Palm Award Ceremony, Enschede, Sustainability is more than the preservation of (More on Page 8) TAFISA President Netherlands, 24th • Global Coalition for an Active World Kick-Off Meeting, Enschede, Netherlands, 24th • TAFISA General Assembly, Enschede, Netherlands, 25th • TAFISA Pilot Event: Walk the Talk, Themes in Brief Enschede, Netherlands, 26th November TAFISA Programs 23rd TAFISA TAFISA Cooperations • TAFISA International CLC, Nanning, China, 21st – 26th & Events World Congress & Networks December 2013 saw longstanding TAFISA programs, With engaging and inspiring conversations and The growth of the global Sport for All network • First national conference in Sport for All and including the CLCs, World Challenge Day and presentations between participants from more is a top priority for TAFISA. More than twen- physical activity, Tehran, Iran, 9th – 10th World Walking Day have another fantastic year, than 60 countries, the 23rd TAFISA World ty new members joined the TAFISA family in • Member Survey, Worldwide, until 13th alongside the successful development and kick- Congress brought to the fore the important triple 2013, while new cooperations were established • Business Development Workshop, Frankfurt, Germany, 16th – 18th off of new programs, TAFISA Triple-AC and bottom line of Sport for All and Sustainability – or strengthened with regional and international • TAFISA DTM Symposium as part of ICHPER-SD SportCityNet. People, Planet, Profit. Sport for All bodies. World Congress, Turkey, 20th (More on Pages 2 & 3) (More on Pages 4 & 5) (More on Pages 6 & 7) Champion of www.tafisa.net TAFISA Programs & Events Triple AC Builds Momentum Casting a Wider SportCityNet 50 Million People Moving for the Launched in 2012, the TAFISA Triple AC (Active Cities, Active Communities, Active Citizens) program, developed in cooperation with the IOC, already gathers more than a hundred best practices. Triple AC aims to encourage cities and communities to develop active programs and World Challenge Day 2013 events for their citizens. It recognises and rewards their good work in five key success areas: The 23rd edition of the TAFISA World Challenge Day was once again a success. In 2013, • Knowledge & Awareness on the 29th of May, more than 50 million people from 3400 cities and communities in 31 • Cooperation & Partnership different countries participated in this friendly, global competition, motivating their citizens to • Programs & Events be physically active for at least 15 minutes. Numerous activities and events took place all over • Spaces & Places the world, especially in America, Asia and Europe. • Monitoring, Evaluation & Continuous Improvement Congratulations to all the participants, and especially to the Fortaleza, Macau/China, All cities and communities are encouraged to join the global Triple AC network. For more Guadalajara de Buga, Tacna and Puerto la Cruz communities, which won the World Challenge information, see www.triple-ac.net. Day Cup in their respective category. Promoting physical activity in urban spaces is a great commitment, and TAFISA encourages all TAFISA Extends its Memorandum cities and communities around the globe to continue their efforts towards a more Active World. WCD in Pitesti, Romania Aizubange, Japan of Understanding with the IOC TAFISA is pleased to announce that its World Challenge Day Cup Winners Exciting 2016 The preparation for the upcoming TAFISA existing Memorandum of Understanding, City Country Population Participants % Games to Come World Sport for All Games is well on its signed in 2010 with the International The SportCityNet first project meeting in Wiesbaden, Germany way. With FORMI, under the presidency Olympic Committee (IOC), has recently Cat. 1 (< 20.000) of Hayono Isman, as a host, the event will been extended until June 2015. Under this Supported by the European Commission 11 Participating Cities Puerto la Cruz Venezuela 2.000 1.440 72 be supported by the Ministry of Sport and agreement, the IOC, which commits itself to as part of the 2012 Preparatory Action: Cat. 2 (20.000 - 10.000) Youth, the Ministry of Health as well as enhancing sport participation and promoting European Partnerships on Sport, the Tacna (province de Tacna) Peru 92.481 64.900 70 the Jakarta Governor. Also, the National healthy lifestyles worldwide, supports the TAFISA SportCityNet Project was launched Cat. 3 (100.000 - 250.000) Olympic Committee has joined the development of the TAFISA Triple AC and in January 2013. Guadalajara de Buga Colombia 115.609 53.198 46 Meeting with Jakarta Governor and FORMI President Organising Committee. Some 100 countries Certified Leadership Course programs. A Cat. 4 (250.000 - 1 million) Hayono Isman are expected to present their traditional
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Relationships Between International Sport Federations and International Disability Sport
    Relationships Between International Sport Federations and International Disability Sport Northeastern University’s Center for the Study of Sport in Society Disability in Sport www.sportinsociety.org Introduction Sport opportunities for people with disabilities worldwide have traditionally been organized by disability rather than sport. International governing bodies for sport for people with disabilities include organizations such as the International Committee for Deaflympics (CISS) for the deaf, Special Olympics International for persons with intellectual disabilities and the International Paralympic Committee traditionally for persons with physical disabilities and since 1992 also for persons with intellectual disabilities. The histories of CISS, SOI and IPC are unique and in many respects more dissimilar than similar. What they do have in common is the reason for their creation: to offer opportunities in a segregated setting that were not being met by the able bodied sport system. Organizational Histories Paralympic sport began in the 1950s with a desire to re-integrate persons with disabilities into mainstream society and for over fifty years this issue has held a significant place within disability sport’s growth and development. Sir Ludwig Guttmann included sport and recreation into his rehabilitation programs at the Stoke Mandeville Rehabilitation hospital precisely to encourage the inclusion of war veterans into mainstream society and it was the games that he held that became the genesis for the Paralympic Games. The International Olympic Committee has signed two agreements with IPC confirming IOC financial and organizational support for the IPC and securing and protecting the organization of the Paralympic Games (Hums, Wolff & Legg, 2003). Special Olympics began in 1968 when Eunice Kennedy Shriver organized the First International Special Olympics Games in Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration/Inclusion in and with Sport for All—Families, Politics, Management and Citizens in Responsibility
    Journal of Sports Science 4 (2016) 32-38 D doi: 10.17265/2332-7839/2016.01.004 DAVID PUBLISHING Integration/Inclusion in and with Sport for All—Families, Politics, Management and Citizens in Responsibility Peter Kapustin1,2 1. Institute of Sport Science, State University Würzburg, Bayern D-0931, Germany 2. Sport- and Event-Management, Private University Castle Seeburg, A-5201, Austria Abstract: The slogan “Sport for All” as a program of TAFISA (The Association For International Sport for All) is an invitation for all target groups and target persons in all societies worldwide to be active in sports, to organize and to create sport activities with a variety of aims. Integration and inclusion are strategies to open the world of sports for people with disabilities or a migrant background as well. Families, politics, the management within companies and all citizens are in responsibility. The development of Sport for All depends on various dimensions, e.g. the different kinds of sport, target groups and aims/motives. Key words: Kinds of sport, target groups, integration and inclusion, dimensions of sport development. 1. Introduction programs—being very different in concept and reality from region to region, from country to country, The following article is a statement to the current between sport federations and sport providers. discussion with integration and inclusion in focus. In This article is focused on the integration and all areas of the social and cultural life in families, inclusion of people with impairments and disabilities communities, regions and nations, both the integration in the world of sports—from special programs for of migrants and the inclusion of citizens with these target persons and groups to integrative and impairments or disabilities, for example, are in inclusive sport activities.
    [Show full text]
  • SPORT for ALL History of a Vision Around the World - Book of Abstracts 19Th ISHPES CONGRESS July 18-21, 2018 in Münster, Germany
    > SPORT FOR ALL History of a Vision Around the World - Book of Abstracts 19th ISHPES CONGRESS July 18-21, 2018 in Münster, Germany www.ishpes.org ISHPES CONGRESS Münster 2018 Table of Contents 4 Greetings 89 Sessions 15-24 ( Thursday) 8 Department of Sport Pedagogy 89 Session 15 and Sport History 92 Session 16 10 Institute of Sport and Exercise 95 Session 17 Sciences 97 Session WGI 11 Partner Organizations 102 Session 18 105 Session 19 24 Schedule ISHPES Congress 2018 107 Session 20 Photo: Presseamt Münster / MünsterView Münster Presseamt Photo: 24 Overview 109 Session 21 26 Detailed Plan 111 Session 22 35 Congress Venue 114 Session 23 117 Session 24 36 Abstracts - Keynotes 119 Session DOA 36 Gigliola Gori 38 Matti Goksøyr 122 Sessions 25-35 (Friday) 40 Lydia Furse 122 Session 25 42 Christopher Young 124 Session 26 Willkommen in Münster / MünsterView Münster Presseamt P.: 127 Session 27 45 Abstracts - Sessions 1-14 131 Session 28 (Wednesday) 133 Session IfSG 45 Session 1 136 Session 29 48 Session 2 139 Session 30 51 Session 3 142 Session 31 54 Session 4 144 Session 32 57 Session 5 147 Session dvs 60 Session 6 150 Session 33 P.: Presseamt Münster / Britta Roski / Britta Münster Presseamt P.: 63 Session 7 152 Session 34 P.: Presseamt Münster / Angelika Klauser / Angelika Münster Presseamt P.: 66 Session ZdS/ZZF 155 Session 35 69 Session 8 158 Session TAFISA 72 Session 9 77 Session 10 162 Sessions 36-39 (Saturday) 80 Session ECS 162 Session 36 81 Session 11 165 Session 37 83 Session 12 168 Session 38 85 Session 13 171 Session 39 87 Session 14 174 Session DAGS Photo: Bastian Arnholdt ( Medilab IfS) ( Medilab Arnholdt Bastian Photo: 178 Panel Discussion 179 Index of Person 2 Table of Contents 3 Dear participants of the ISHPES Congress 2018, Greetings As president of ISHPES I want to welcome you all to Münster, Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Elite Sports for Persons With
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS OLYMPICS PARALYMPICS Elite sports for persons with a disability – principally a physical or sensory Olympic-type sports for disability persons who are classified as having an intellectual Impairment Classifications disability. Olympic sports for elite = Athletes with Cerebral sportspeople Palsy (CPISRA), Athletes Athletes may also have a with Spinal Cord Lesion, physical disability, but first Spina Bifida and Polio classification = ID (ISMWSF), Athletes with Blindness (IBSA) and Athletes with Les Autres or Amputations (ISOD) Athletes of all ages are catered for: Minimum age for entering Age of athletes vary Age of athletes vary competition = 8 yrs according to sport, but few according to sport but few very young or old athletes young or older athletes NO upper limit – in 1987 there was a 70+ yr old Swedish Level I artistic gymnast All ability groups are Elite athletes only – entry Elite athletes only – entry included in the sports standards standards competition Year-Round Training and Year-Round Training and Centralized training prior to Competition Competition competition Every athlete receives Only first three are Only first three are recognition for all events recognized recognized SPECIAL OLYMPICS OLYMPICS PARALYMPICS Some events have been Some events have been Regular standardized adapted to meet ability adapted to meet ability competition levels of athletes levels of athletes Summer and Winter World Summer and Winter Games every 4 years – Olympic Games every 4 Summer Paralympic years – Games one month after First International Summer Olympic Games – begun in Games in 1968, Chicago, First Modern Olympics held 1988 after Seoul Olympic USA; First International in 1896, in Athens, Greece; Games Winter Games in 1977, Winter Olympic Games in Colorado, USA Chamonix, France in 1924 Independent organization Government supported Government supported and structure Competition Levels: - School- Local, State, National, Regional International Only Area/District and International - State/Province, National - Regional, International .
    [Show full text]
  • From Brighton to Helsinki
    From Brighton to Helsinki Women and Sport Progress Report 1994-2014 Kari Fasting Trond Svela Sand Elizabeth Pike Jordan Matthews 1 ISSN: 2341-5754 Publication of the Finnish Sports Confederation Valo 6/2014 ISBN 978-952-297-021-3 2 From Brighton to Helsinki Women and Sport Progress Report 1994-2014 Kari Fasting, Trond Svela Sand, Elizabeth Pike, Jordan Matthews IWG Helsinki 2014 1 Foreword: Address from the IWG Co-Chair 2010 – 2014 in sport at all levels and in all functions and roles. The variety and number of organisations engaged in this work is remarkable, and the number con- tinues to grow. Twenty years marks a point in the history of the Brighton Declaration, where we can and must review the implementation of this document. The ‘From Brighton to Helsinki’ IWG Progress Report provides examples of initiatives that have been undertaken by Brighton Declaration signatories and Catalyst-subscribers to empower women. In spite of these efforts, the latest data shows that in some areas progress has been limited. The IWG Progress Report offers a chance to evaluate the Dear friends, measures already taken and sheds light on the Twenty years have passed quickly. I wonder if new goals and actions that we must adopt in order to take further steps toward our mission: ‘Empow- Women and Sport in 1994 in Brighton, UK, ever ering women – advancing sport’. imagined how things would have developed by 2014. The Brighton Declaration on Women and On behalf of the International Working Group on Sport has been endorsed by more than 400 or- Women and Sport (IWG) I would like to express ganisations worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Olympics Massachusetts Program Policies & Practices Table
    PROGRAM POLICIES & PRACTICES HANDBOOK Revised October 2012 SPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS PROGRAM POLICIES & PRACTICES TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 5 A. SOMA Philosophy ..................................................................................................... 6 B. SOMA Mission Statement ......................................................................................... 6 C. SOMA Vision Statement ........................................................................................... 6 D. SOMA Key Principles ................................................................................................ 6 E. SOMA Values ............................................................................................................ 7 II. ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................................ 8 A. SOMA Organizational Chart .................................................................................... 9 B. Section Map ............................................................................................................ 11 III. LOCAL PROGRAMS........................................................................................................... 13 A. Definition of Local Program .................................................................................... 14 B. Local Programs Financial Guidelines .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT : 26Th TAFISA WORLD CONGRESS 2019 Tokyo
    26th TAFISA WORLD CONGRESS 2019 Tokyo “Sport for All Through Tradition and Innovation” REPORT Date: 13th ~ 16th November 2019 Venue: Toshi Center Hotel Tokyo & Kojimachi Junior High School Organiser Hosts Japan Sports Agency Japanese Olympic Committee Supporters Special Partner Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Japanese Para-Sports Association Congress Sponsors Partner History of TAFISA World Congress No. Year Host city & country 1st 1969 Oslo, Norway 2nd 1971 Arnhem, Netherlands 3rd 1973 Frankfurt am Main, Germany 4th 1975 Washington, D.C., USA 5th 1977 Paris, France 6th 1979 Lisbon, Portugal 7th 1981 Mürren, Switzerland 8th 1983 Stockholm, Sweden 9th 1985 Islay, United Kingdom 10th 1987 Oslo, Norway 11th 1989 Toronto, Canada 12th 1991 Bordeaux, France 13th 1993 Chiba, Japan 14th 1995 Netanye, Israel 15th 1997 Penang, Malaysia 16th 1999 Larnaka, Cyprus 17th 2001 Cape Town, South Africa 18th 2003 Munich, Germany 19th 2005 Warsaw, Poland 20th 2007 Buenos Aires, Argentina 21st 2009 Taiwan, Chinese Taipei 22nd 2011 Antalya, Turkey 23rd 2013 Enschede, Netherlands 24th 2015 Budapest, Hungary 25th 2017 Seoul, Korea 26th 2019 Tokyo, Japan Table of Contents Greetings ................................................................................................................... 2 26th TAFISA WORLD CONGRESS 2019 Tokyo - Overview ..................................................................................................................... 4 - Participants (Countries/Regions) ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • USA Games Advancement Criteria
    Supplemental Document to Athlete Nomination Criteria Introduction: Once every 4 years, Special Olympics athletes in the United States are provided the opportunity to represent our country at the highest level of competition - World Games (respectively for Summer & Winter Games)! Undoubtedly, one of the highest levels of privilege and opportunity for any Special Olympics athlete. In theory we would like to believe that consideration for selection for a World Games event should be afforded to every Special Olympics athlete. However due to many factors and considerations there is a need to better “screen” athletes who are selected to ensure that each athlete, coach, management team member and volunteer can achieve the best experience possible. Factors/considerations that make the World Games experience not only unique but challenging; • Length of Games – the World Games experience can involve anywhere from 18-21 days. The length of time required depends on the location of the Games and the pre-Games experience. For many Special Olympics athletes, this length of time away from home can prove to be a challenge. • Time Away from Parents/Family – Because of the structure of the U.S. Team, athletes chosen can expect to be away from their families for extended periods of time without seeing them and at times, with very limited contact. For some athletes this can cause stress and anxiety. • Adjusting to New Coaches – Coaches selected for the U.S. Team come from all across the country and it is rare for a World Games athlete to already know one of these coaches. Can the athlete adapt to a new coach? • Conform to the Group/Adaptability – In order for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER-4 Physical Education and Sports for CWSN
    CHAPTER-4 Physical Education and Sports for CWSN (Children with Special Needs) 4.1 AIMS & OBJECTIVES OF ADAPTED PHYSICAL EDUCATION Adapted Physical Education is a science of developing, implementing, and monitoring a designed physical education instructional programme for an individual with a disability, based on a comprehensive assessment, to give the learner the skills necessary for a lifetime of rich recreation, leisure and sport experiences to increase physical fitness and wellness. Adapted physical education is physical education that is individualized and specially designed to address the needs of students with disabilities who require adaptations or modifications to be physically active, participate safely, and make progress toward the standards for Health, Safety, and Physical Education. In simple words, we can say the physical education program designed for individuals with disabilities is called adapted physical education. The program is adapted to meet the needs of each student through modifications and accommodations. According to Auxter, D., Pyfer, J. & Huettig, C. “ Adapted physical education is the art and science of developing and implementing a carefully designed physical education instructional program for an individual with a disability, based on a comprehensive assessment, to give the individual the skills necessary for a lifetime of rich leisure, recreation, and sport experiences”. Adapted physical education is used to emphasise the importance of understanding the scientific bases of human development as it bring into relations to teaching appropriate concepts and practices in the adapted physical education program which will serve to maximize the quality of life among individuals with disabilities. Adapted physical education is clear that practices that influencing exercise, fitness, diet and nutritional status can significantly impact the quality and duration of life of an individuals with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring-2013 En.Pdf
    KU Leuven – TNO – This study was funded by the Directorate-General for Education and Culture of the European Commission. The opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the European Commission. stitute – Sheffield Hallam University Mulier In Contact: Mulier Institute social-scientific sport research PO box 85445 3508 AK Utrecht, the Netherlands t 0031-30-7210220 e [email protected] i www.mulierinstituut.nl 2 Executive summary 5 1. Introduction 13 1.1 The rising social and political significance of sport 13 1.2 The demand for evidence-based sport policies 14 1.3 Feasibility study: aims, objectives and methodology 15 1.4 Structure of the report 17 2. Questionnaire 19 2.1 Methodology and response group 19 2.2 Results 20 2.3 Conclusion 27 3. Social aspects of sport 29 3.1 Main substantial issues in this field and organisations involved 29 3.2 Data gathering 31 3.3 Dissemination of knowledge (networks, websites, good practices) 36 3.4 Conclusion 38 4. Sport and health 41 4.1 Main substantial issues in this field and organisations involved 41 4.2 Data gathering 43 4.3 Dissemination of knowledge (networks, websites, good practices) 46 4.4 Conclusion 47 5. Economic aspects of sport 51 5.1 Main substantial issues in this field and organisations involved 51 5.2 Data gathering 55 5.3 Dissemination of knowledge 56 5.4 Conclusion 57 6. Main findings 59 6.1 Overall findings 59 6.2 Social aspects of sport 60 6.3 Sport and health 61 6.4 Economic aspects of sport 62 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Thirty-First Session 16Th-31St July 1991
    INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY THIRTY-FIRST SESSION 16th-31st JULY 1991 SPORT FOR ALL AND THE OLYMPIC PHILOSOPHY Published and edited jointly by the International Olympic Committee and the International Olympic Academy. ©1992 INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY REPORT OF THE THIRTY-FIRST SESSION 16th-31st JULY 1991 ANCIENT OLYMPIA IOC COMMISSION FOR THE INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY President Mr Nikos FILARETOS IOC Member in Greece Members Mr Fernando Ferreira Lima BELLO IOC Member in Portugal Mr Ivan DIBOS IOC Member in Peru Mrs Flor ISAVA-FONSECA IOC Member in Venezuela Major General Francis NYANGWESO IOC Member in Uganda Mr Wlodzimierz RECZEK IOC Member in Poland Mr German RIECKEHOFF IOC Honorary Member in Puerto Rico Mr Ching-Kuo WU IOC Member in Taiwan H.E. Mr Mohamed ZERGUINI IOC Member in Algeria Mr Anselmo LOPEZ Director of Olympic Solidarity M. Heinz KEMPA Representative of the I.F. Secretary General of the International Judo Federation Mr Abdul Muttaleb AHMAD Representative of the NOCs Mr Peter MONTGOMERY Representative of the Athletes' Commission Mr Conrado DURANTEZ Individual Member Mrs Nadia LEKARSKA Individual Member Professor Norbert MUELLER Individual Member 7 EPHORIA (BOARD OF TRUSTEES) OF THE INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY President Mr Nikos FILARETOS IOC Member in Greece 1st Vice-Président Mr Zacharias ALEXANDROU 1st Vice-President of the Hellenic Olympic Committee 2nd Vice-Président Mr Nikolaos PANTAZIS Member of the Hellenic Olympic Committee Members Mr Lambis NIKOLAOU IOC Member in Greece President of the Hellenic Olympic Committee Mr Dimitris DIATHESSOPOULOS Secretary General of the Hellenic Olympic Committee Mr George DOLIANITIS Mr Stavros LAGAS Mr Elias SPORIDIS Hon. Vice-President Mr Nikos YALOURIS 8 FOREWORD Motion is characteristic of man's entity and part of his nature; it gives him the inherent ability to «enact» and «express» in his environment, through harmonious and rhythmic movements, his psychosomatic self.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Olympics Research Overview
    Special Olympics Research Overview 94% of Special Olympics athletes reported improved sports skills. More than 5.7 million 97% of Unified Special Olympics Children ages 2-7 experienced a teammates athletes without compete across of high school seniors say that disabilities 7 month gain reported in motor skills after participation in an Unified Champion 172 schools is changing increased countries, 8-week Young Athletes program. their school for the understanding of averaging better people with intellectual 298 disabilities. competitions each day around the world. 65% of of healthcare Special Olympics' parents providers felt brand ranks highly in felt that participation in better prepared to Special Olympics had raised treat people with their expectations of their intellectual familiarity sons and daughters. and disabilities. favorability ratings. Over half of athletes’ siblings in the United States felt that participation in Special Olympics brought their family closer together. Table of Contents Special Olympics Attitudes Research .................................................................................. 5 Why Attitudes? ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Public Attitudes Toward People with Intellectual Disabilities .........................................................6 Changing Attitudes through Special Olympics .................................................................................. 9 Key Findings: Special Olympics
    [Show full text]