Preparation of Papers for AIAA Technical Conferences

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preparation of Papers for AIAA Technical Conferences RL10 Engine Ability to Transition from Atlas to Shuttle/Centaur Program Joseph F. BaumeisterI NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135 A key launch vehicle design feature is the ability to take advantage of new technologies while minimizing expensive and time consuming development and test programs. With successful space launch experiences and the unique features of both the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Space Transportation System (Space Shuttle) and Atlas/Centaur programs, it became attractive to leverage these capabilities. The Shuttle/Centaur Program was created to transition the existing Centaur vehicle to be launched from the Space Shuttle cargo bay. This provided the ability to launch heaver and larger payloads, and take advantage of new unique launch operational capabilities. A successful Shuttle/Centaur Program required the Centaur main propulsion system to quickly accommodate the new operating conditions for two new Shuttle/Centaur configurations and evolve to function in the human Space Shuttle environment. This paper describes the transition of the Atlas/Centaur RL10 engine to the Shuttle/Centaur configurations; shows the unique versatility and capability of the engine; and highlights the importance of ground testing. Propulsion testing outcomes emphasize the value added benefits of testing heritage hardware and the significant impact to existing and future programs. Nomenclature LH2 = liquid hydrogen LOX = liquid oxygen O/F = oxidizer fuel ratio ONPSP = oxidizer net positive suction pressure OPIP = oxidizer pump inlet pressure TDRSS = Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System I. Introduction NASA’s Centaur vehicle was the first of a new generation of space vehicle upper-stage rockets that pioneered the use of liquid hydrogen fuel for space flight. The Centaur upper-stage was developed by NASA Lewis Research Center, now Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio. The Centaur became the world’s first high-energy upper- stage, burning liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid oxygen (LOX) to place payloads in geosynchronous orbits or to provide escape velocity for interplanetary space probes. In combination with the RL10 engine (currently manufactured by Aerojet Rocketdyne), the Centaur became the highest performing upper-stage and one of the most prominent launch vehicles in America’s exploration of space. The vehicle has more than 200 launches that included sending the Voyager spacecraft to the outer planets, Viking landers to the surface of Mars, Cassini to Saturn, and the New Horizons probe to Pluto. The Centaur Vehicle was developed and manufactured by General Dynamics / Astronautics under the direction of NASA’s Lewis Research Center.1 The Centaur Program started in 1958 with its first successful flight in November 27, 1963 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. Since then the vehicle has undergone numerous evolutionary upgrades and modification to improve its performance, operability, and reliability. From 1966 to 1989, the Centaur-D configuration was used as the upper-stage for 63 Atlas rocket launches (55 successful launches). Today the Atlas/Centaur has evolved into a I Aerospace Engineer, NASA Glenn Research Center, Propulsion Division, 21000 Brookpark Rd., Cleveland, OH, 44135. 1 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics suite of Atlas supported vehicles launching from both Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and Vandenberg Air Force Base. Hydrogen in its natural state is a gas and is the lightest and simplest of all elements. Liquid hydrogen is colorless, odorless, and very lightweight. To remain in a liquid state, hydrogen must be kept supercooled to -423 °F (-253 °C). For the Centaur to accommodate liquid hydrogen, new technologies were required. This included developing a highly integrated propellant storage and utilization system that included thermal insulation, propellant feed system and propulsion capable engines. It also required appropriate hydrogen ground handling and controls. This lightweight Centaur vehicle with engines that utilized liquid hydrogen and oxygen mixture could then deliver about 35 percent more thrust per pound of propellant than other conventional kerosene-type fuels. The RL10 propulsion engine was a major sub-system in the successful Centaur Program and continues to provide sustained reliability and performance. Its efficiency and capabilities have kept the Centaur in the forefront of space flight. Integrating the existing Centaur RL10 engine within the Space Shuttle was a cornerstone of the Shuttle/Centaur Program. The RL10 operational flexibility enabled easy transition with minimal modifications and the ability to transition to a human space flight environment. We will explore the differences between the Atlas/Centaur and Shuttle/Centaur vehicles, impacts on the propulsion system, and the role ground testing provided. II. Atlas/Centaur Vehicle Configuration The Atlas/Centaur is an expendable launch vehicle derived from the SM-65D Atlas intercontinental ballistic missile in the late 1950s. The Atlas boosters were developed by the United States Air Force and were repurposed for NASA’s Atlas/Centaur Program. The Atlas first stage booster rocket was mated to the new Centaur liquid-hydrogen and liquid-oxygen cryogenic fueled upper stage. This high-energy Centaur upper-stage was capable of placing much heavier payloads into higher earth orbits, unmanned lunar trajectories, or planetary trajectories by incorporating the new RL10 propulsion system. This Atlas/Centaur design is shown in Fig. 1 & 2. The Atlas/Centaur-2 launch demonstrated a successful Centaur vehicle separation and flight with the first RL10 engine inflight burn of liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. The Centaur vehicle had an extraordinary operational success record and has been called “America's Workhorse in Space”. Figure 1. Atlas/Centaur Configuration and Atlas/Centaur-2 Launch. Figure 2. Early Centaur Configuration. 2 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics The Centaur D-1 vehicle was 29 feet in length and had a diameter of 10 feet with all avionics and payload mounted on the forward adapter. It had no internal support structure and was pressurized to maintain it shape and strength. The thrust was obtained from two RL10 engines that generate 15,000 nominal pounds of thrust each. These engines were capable of being shut-down and restarted during flight to increase mission capability and were gimbaled to provide spacecraft directional control. Figure 3 shows the Centaur engine configuration as the vehicle is being lowered into a NASA Lewis Research Center Test facility. In addition, smaller hydrogen peroxide engines provided additional thrust for propellant settling and attitude control during transition and low thrust coast periods. This vehicle had the capability of lifting over 8000 pound payloads into near Earth orbits, 2300 pounds to the Moon, and boosting 1300 pounds on interplanetary trajectories. Unique Centaur design features and upgrades included: Thin wall stainless steel tanks (lightweight). Structural rigidity was provided by propellant pressure (prior to propellant loading, nitrogen gas pressurization provided structural support). A common double-bulkhead to separate the LOX and LH2 tanks. Multiple engine restart vehicle. Hydrazine monopropellant reaction control system (previously a hydrogen peroxide system). Tank pressure from RL10 boost pumps (previous hydrogen peroxide system). Centaur powered by one or two RL10 rocket engines. Figure 3. Atlas/Centaur Being Lowered into NASA Lewis Research Center Test Facility. III. Titan-Centaur Vehicle Configuration The Centaur was also successfully integrated with the United States Air Force Titan vehicle known as Titan IIIE. The Centaur was modified to be used as the third stage on the Titan IIIE vehicle. From 1974 to 1977, the Centaur D- 1T configuration launches included the Viking 1 & 2, Voyager 1 & 2, and Helios 1 & 2. Figure 4 shows the Titan/Centaur configuration. Figure 4. Titan/Centaur Vehicle (Left), Centaur and Payload (Middle), August 20, 1975 Titan Centaur Launch of Viking 1 Spacecraft (Right). 3 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics IV. Centaur RL10 Engines The RL10 engine was designed as a regeneratively cooled system (hydrogen cooled thrust chamber) which included a turbo-pump that utilized an expander cycle (thrust chamber expanded hydrogen to power turbo-pump).2 The original Centaur engines flown on the first successful Atlas/Centaur flight were designated as the RL10A-3 engines. Over the years, prior to the Shuttle/Centaur Program, the engines were upgraded to enhance vehicle performance, shown in Table 1. The engine is shown in Fig. 5. Table 1. Early RL10 Engine Performance Upgrades. RL10 Model Number RL10A-1 RL10A-3 RL10A-3-1 RL10A-3-3 RL10A-3-3A Thrust, lbs. (Vacuum) 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 16,500 ISP, sec. (5.0 Mixture) 424 429 433 444 446.4 Chamber Pressure, psia 300 300 300 395 465 Throat Diameter, in. 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.1 4.9 Expansion Ratio 40:1 40:1 40:1 57:1 61:1 70 long Engine Envelope, in. Unchanged Unchanged Unchanged Unchanged 40 wide Figure 5. RL10A-3-3A Engine Side Views. Each Centaur RL10A-3-3A engine at space vacuum conditions produced a rated thrust of 16,500 pounds and a 444.4 ± 2.5 sec nominal specific impulse at a nominal propellant oxidizer to fuel mixture ratio of 5.0:1. The engines also gimbal which provides flight control, are capable of inflight restarts, and provide a small amount of hydrogen gas for vehicle fuel tank pressurization. Solenoid
Recommended publications
  • Privacy Statement Link at the Bottom of Aerojet Rocketdyne Websites
    Privacy Notice Aerojet Rocketdyne – For external use Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 3 Why we collect personal information? ............................................................................. 3 How we collect personal information? ............................................................................. 3 How we use information we collect? ............................................................................... 4 How we share your information? .................................................................................... 4 How we protect your personal information? ..................................................................... 4 How we collect consent? .............................................................................................. 4 How we provide you access? ........................................................................................ 4 How to contact Aerojet Rocketdyne privacy?.................................................................... 5 Collection of personal information .................................................................................. 5 Disclosure of personal information.................................................................................. 5 Sale of personal information .......................................................................................... 6 Children’s online privacy ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160008869 2019-08-29T17:47:59+00:00Z CHAPTER 12 Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems John A. Halchak Consultant, Los Angeles, California James L. Cannon NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama Corey Brown Aerojet-Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, Florida 12.1 Introduction Earth to orbit launch vehicles are propelled by rocket engines and motors, both liquid and solid. This chapter will discuss liquid engines. The heart of a launch vehicle is its engine. The remainder of the vehicle (with the notable exceptions of the payload and guidance system) is an aero structure to support the propellant tanks which provide the fuel and oxidizer to feed the engine or engines. The basic principle behind a rocket engine is straightforward. The engine is a means to convert potential thermochemical energy of one or more propellants into exhaust jet kinetic energy. Fuel and oxidizer are burned in a combustion chamber where they create hot gases under high pressure. These hot gases are allowed to expand through a nozzle. The molecules of hot gas are first constricted by the throat of the nozzle (de-Laval nozzle) which forces them to accelerate; then as the nozzle flares outwards, they expand and further accelerate. It is the mass of the combustion gases times their velocity, reacting against the walls of the combustion chamber and nozzle, which produce thrust according to Newton’s third law: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. [1] Solid rocket motors are cheaper to manufacture and offer good values for their cost.
    [Show full text]
  • ADVANCED SPACE ENGINE N74-16489 PRELIINABY DESIGN (Rocketdyne) F5,-P HC CSCL 21H $27.25 Unclas G3/28 28289 1
    NASA CR-121236 R-9269 ADVANCED SPACE ENGINE PRELIMINARY DESIGN By A. T. Zachary ROCKETDYNE DIVISION C- ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL Prepared for NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION NASA-Lewis Research Center Contract NAS3-16751 (NVSA-CR-121236) ADVANCED SPACE ENGINE N74-16489 PRELIINABY DESIGN (Rocketdyne) f5,-p HC CSCL 21H $27.25 Unclas G3/28 28289 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA CR-121236 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date ADVANCED SPACE ENGINE PRELIMINARY DESIGN October 1973 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. A.T. Zachary R-9269 10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address Rocketdyne Division, Rockwell International 11. Contract or Grant No. Canoga Park, California, 91304 NAS3-16751 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Contractor Report National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C., 20546 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Project Manager, D.D. Scheer, NASA-Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio 16. Abstract Analysis and design of an optimum LO2/LH2, combustion topping cycle, 88,964 N (20,000-pound) thrust, liquid rocket engine was conducted. The design selected is well suited to high-energy, upper-stage engine applications such as the Space Tug and embodies features directed toward optimization of vehicle performance. A configuration selection was conducted based on prior Air Force Contracts F04611-71-C0039, F04611-71-C-0040, and F04611-67-C-0016,.and additional criteria for optimum stage performance. Following configuration selection, analyses and design of the major components and engine systems were conducted to sufficient depth to provide layout drawings suitable for subsequent detailing.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Shuttle Main Engine Orientation
    BC98-04 Space Transportation System Training Data Space Shuttle Main Engine Orientation June 1998 Use this data for training purposes only Rocketdyne Propulsion & Power BOEING PROPRIETARY FORWARD This manual is the supporting handout material to a lecture presentation on the Space Shuttle Main Engine called the Abbreviated SSME Orientation Course. This course is a technically oriented discussion of the SSME, designed for personnel at any level who support SSME activities directly or indirectly. This manual is updated and improved as necessary by Betty McLaughlin. To request copies, or obtain information on classes, call Lori Circle at Rocketdyne (818) 586-2213 BOEING PROPRIETARY 1684-1a.ppt i BOEING PROPRIETARY TABLE OF CONTENT Acronyms and Abbreviations............................. v Low-Pressure Fuel Turbopump............................ 56 Shuttle Propulsion System................................. 2 HPOTP Pump Section............................................ 60 SSME Introduction............................................... 4 HPOTP Turbine Section......................................... 62 SSME Highlights................................................... 6 HPOTP Shaft Seals................................................. 64 Gimbal Bearing.................................................... 10 HPFTP Pump Section............................................ 68 Flexible Joints...................................................... 14 HPFTP Turbine Section......................................... 70 Powerhead...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AEHF-6 Launch Marks 500Th Flight of Aerojet Rocketdyne's RL10 Engine
    AEHF-6 Launch Marks 500th Flight of Aerojet Rocketdyne’s RL10 Engine March 27, 2020 CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla., March 26, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The successful March 26 launch of the U.S. Space Force’s sixth and final Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) military communications satellite aboard a United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V rocket marked the 500th flight of Aerojet Rocketdyne’s RL10 upper-stage engine. The RL10, which powers the ULA Atlas V Centaur upper stage, is one of several Aerojet Rocketdyne propulsion products supporting the mission. Aerojet Rocketdyne propulsion can be found on both the rocket and the AEHF-6 satellite. Built by Lockheed Martin, the AEHF satellites provide secure, jam-proof communications, including nuclear command and control, to U.S. and allied forces. “This launch marks an important milestone for Aerojet Rocketdyne and for the country,” said Eileen Drake, Aerojet Rocketdyne’s CEO and president. “The RL10 has supported a majority of the nation’s most important national security and scientific missions, including all of the AEHF satellites which provide communication links that are critical to our warfighters.” The Atlas V in the 551 configuration is the most powerful vehicle in the Atlas V family, featuring five Aerojet Rocketdyne AJ-60A solid rocket strap-on motors, each generating 348,500 pounds of thrust. Designed specifically to provide extra lifting power to the Atlas V, the AJ-60A is the world’s largest monolithic solid rocket motor ever flown. The AEHF-6 satellite, meanwhile, is outfitted with three different types of Aerojet Rocketdyne thrusters for attitude control, orbital station keeping and maneuvering.
    [Show full text]
  • SLS Case Study
    CASE STUDY Supporting Space Flight History with the Space Launch System (SLS) Technetics Group is a proud sup- Boeing representatives held a sup- plier to NASA, Boeing and Aerojet plier recognition presentation for Rocketdyne, and proved instru- the Technetics team members, mental in working with these orga- citing outstanding performance nizations on the development of in providing hydraulic accumula- NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS). tors and reservoirs for the Thrust The SLS is an advanced, heavy-lift Vector Control hydraulic system, BELFAB Edge-Welded launch vehicle that will send astro- located within the Core Stage of Metal Bellows nauts into deep space and open the rocket. Technetics was one up the possibility for missions to of the first suppliers on the pro- Qualiseal Mechanical neighboring planets. The program gram to have provided all Flight 1 Seals is enabling humans to travel fur- requirements and subsystem test ther into space than ever before units. and paving the way for new sci- Aerojet Rocketdyne also rec- entific discoveries and knowledge ognized Technetics and stated that was once out of reach. that Technetics “has gone above Technetics has worked closely and beyond to produce quality with program design teams for hardware and support aggressive critical applications for the Core schedules,” and that “Technetics Stage and Upper Stage on the SLS. efforts and those of Technetics NAFLEX Seals Specifically, a number of preci- employees have not gone unno- sion sealing solutions and fluid ticed.” To express their appre- management components were ciation, Aerojet Rocketdyne needed for Aerojet Rocketdyne’s representatives visited the RS-25 and RL10 engines to ensure Technetics Deland, FL facility to the integrity of the overall system.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo Rocket Propulsion Development
    REMEMBERING THE GIANTS APOLLO ROCKET PROPULSION DEVELOPMENT Editors: Steven C. Fisher Shamim A. Rahman John C. Stennis Space Center The NASA History Series National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA History Division Office of External Relations Washington, DC December 2009 NASA SP-2009-4545 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Remembering the Giants: Apollo Rocket Propulsion Development / editors, Steven C. Fisher, Shamim A. Rahman. p. cm. -- (The NASA history series) Papers from a lecture series held April 25, 2006 at the John C. Stennis Space Center. Includes bibliographical references. 1. Saturn Project (U.S.)--Congresses. 2. Saturn launch vehicles--Congresses. 3. Project Apollo (U.S.)--Congresses. 4. Rocketry--Research--United States--History--20th century-- Congresses. I. Fisher, Steven C., 1949- II. Rahman, Shamim A., 1963- TL781.5.S3R46 2009 629.47’52--dc22 2009054178 Table of Contents Foreword ...............................................................................................................................7 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................9 Welcome Remarks Richard Gilbrech ..........................................................................................................11 Steve Fisher ...................................................................................................................13 Chapter One - Robert Biggs, Rocketdyne - F-1 Saturn V First Stage Engine .......................15
    [Show full text]
  • Rocketdyne R-6636-L FINAL RE PORT FLUORINE-HYDROGEN
    (THRU) ° %/ / (PAGES) (CODE:) NASA CR-5497_ _-_ (NASA CR OR TMX OR AD NUMBER) (CATEGORY) Rocketdyne R-6636-l FINAL RE PORT FLUORINE-HYDROGEN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION .J PHASE I, PART I : ANALYSIS, DESIGN, AND DEMONSTRATION HIGH-PERFORMANCE INJECTORS FOR THE LIQUID F LUORINE- GASE OUS HYDROGEN PROPE L LANT C OMBINATION By GPO PRICE $ i{ H. A. Arbit CFSTI PRICE(S)•$ So Do Clapp Hard copy (HC) Microfiche (M F) ff 653 July 65 prepared for NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Contract NASw- 1229 ROCKETDYNE RESEARCH DEPARTMENT North American Aviation, Inc. 6633 Canoga Avenue, Canoga Park, California NOTI CE This report was prepared as an account of Government sponsored Work. Neither the United States, nor the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), nor any person acting on be- half of NASA: A.) Makes any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or B.) Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, ¢ or for damages resulting from the use of any infor- mation, apparatus, method or process disclosed in this report. As used above, "person acting on behalf of NASA" includes any employee or contractor of NASA, or employee of such contractor, to the extent that such employee or contractor of NASA or employee of such contractor prepares, disseminates, or provides access to, any information pursuant to his employment or contractor with NASA, or his employment with such contractor.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerojet Rocketdyne Propulsion Supported United Launch Alliance's Successful Atlas V Mission for the U.S
    May 22, 2014 Aerojet Rocketdyne Propulsion Supported United Launch Alliance's Successful Atlas V Mission for the U.S. Government SACRAMENTO, Calif., May 22, 2014 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aerojet Rocketdyne, a GenCorp (NYSE:GY) company, played a significant role in successfully launching a national security payload into orbit for the U.S. government. The mission was launched from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida aboard a United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V rocket, with an Aerojet Rocketdyne RL10A-4-2 upper-stage engine, five helium pressurization tanks and a dozen Centaur upper-stage thrusters used for roll, pitch, yaw and settling burns. "Aerojet Rocketdyne is proud to help deliver this critical payload to orbit," said Steve Bouley, vice president of Space Launch Systems at Aerojet Rocketdyne. "We understand the importance these missions play in our national security, and we are honored our customers selected us to provide the safest, most dependable propulsion systems on the market." After the Atlas V lifted off the pad and the Centaur upper stage separated from the launch vehicle, a single RL10A-2 engine ignited to place the payload into orbit, helped by the Centaur thrusters and other Aerojet Rocketdyne-provided hardware for both the booster and upper stage. The ever-reliable RL10A-4-2 engine delivers 22,300 pounds of thrust to power the Atlas V upper-stage, using cryogenic liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen propellants during its operation. ARDÉ, a subsidiary of Aerojet Rocketdyne based in New Jersey, provides the pressure vessels on the first and second stages on the launch vehicle. Twelve Aerojet Rocketdyne monopropellant (hydrazine) thrusters in four modules on the Atlas V Centaur upper stage provided roll, pitch and yaw control as well as settling burns for the upper stage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Commercial Launch Vehicles
    Fourth Quarter 2001 Quarterly Launch Report 8 The Evolution of Commercial Launch Vehicles INTRODUCTION LAUNCH VEHICLE ORIGINS On February 14, 1963, a Delta launch vehi- The initial development of launch vehicles cle placed the Syncom 1 communications was an arduous and expensive process that satellite into geosynchronous orbit (GEO). occurred simultaneously with military Thirty-five years later, another Delta weapons programs; launch vehicle and launched the Bonum 1 communications missile developers shared a large portion of satellite to GEO. Both launches originated the expenses and technology. The initial from Launch Complex 17, Pad B, at Cape generation of operational launch vehicles in Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. both the United States and the Soviet Union Bonum 1 weighed 21 times as much as the was derived and developed from the oper- earlier Syncom 1 and the Delta launch vehicle ating country's military ballistic missile that carried it had a maximum geosynchro- programs. The Russian Soyuz launch vehicle nous transfer orbit (GTO) capacity 26.5 is a derivative of the first Soviet interconti- times greater than that of the earlier vehicle. nental ballistic missile (ICBM) and the NATO-designated SS-6 Sapwood. The Launch vehicle performance continues to United States' Atlas and Titan launch vehicles constantly improve, in large part to meet the were developed from U.S. Air Force's first demands of an increasing number of larger two ICBMs of the same names, while the satellites. Current vehicles are very likely to initial Delta (referred to in its earliest be changed from last year's versions and are versions as Thor Delta) was developed certainly not the same as ones from five from the Thor intermediate range ballistic years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Thirty-Five Years in Power for America
    R O C K E T D Y Thirty-Five Years in Power for America Rochb,JOH -AL hternaund 4@ocae¢dgne Divis!o n ~PaosRExa; For more Ham a ienemfani, Rockeidync has been ont then, where t/te net iou i s must color(I I I nud intense . As ill,, natim i /ills u « nn°d inl apace, pna°r 1,q Rm 1, 1,1 ync has Dorn a key rlemru f` ,,fill esua"s shny,roilh/' ;fOu/nm/sear idreliabilitu/ urunatcln'd bymnlal/rerrudcrli'ii necumpmutin t/c:maldd. AndOilhI/in( has been thegrnzoth of Rnrketdlpu info a murlel-c/mss loader hr directed enlryy technology, spare-horse puroer sgsteurs and n uc learpmlrr-all a direct rejl eciat I "four pride it l hin" a part of Hie American space, enet'gy and dejolse efforts . Front the rent fires, WI''ii' /ten t/sri' with the best tilenf and oil of the cner ;y roc, nI muslcr, ulillr our ambitions set Otl file must distant stars . Front the uoeninq slur/ 35 years ago, iuc'ire been with the Americml tram drat ta,ardred humankind into space, and in turn, brow ;/lit the 6enl'fits of spare back to Fai lh . Edited by J . Mitchell / Designed by J . Allstott Production by Racketdyne Pub'ications Services Our special appreciatimt to Elm vaurfuez-MOrrtsan of Media 5eroice3 Corporation and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for their help in securing marry of the photos that appear in this Wok . We are theeprygrateful . The Early Years Thirty-Five Years The Rocketdyne I started working for many years ago was called the Propulsion Center of MACE (Missile and Control Equipment) of North American Aviation .
    [Show full text]
  • Ares V Cargo Launch Vehicle
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Constellation Program: America's Fleet of Next-Generation Launch Vehicles The Ares V Cargo Launch Vehicle Planning and early design are under way for being developed by NASA’s Constellation hardware, propulsion systems and associated Program to carry human explorers back to technologies for NASA’s Ares V cargo launch the moon, and then onward to Mars and other vehicle — the “heavy lifter” of America’s next- destinations in the solar system. generation space fleet. facts The Ares V effort includes multiple project Ares V will serve as NASA’s primary vessel for element teams at NASA centers and contract safe, reliable delivery of resources to space organizations around the nation, and is led — from large-scale hardware and materials by the Exploration Launch Projects Office for establishing a permanent moon base, to at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in food, fresh water and other staples needed to Huntsville, Ala. These teams rely on nearly a extend a human presence beyond Earth orbit. half a century of NASA spaceflight experience and aerospace technology advances. Together, Under the goals of the Vision for Space they are developing new vehicle hardware Exploration, Ares V is a vital part of the cost- and flight systems and maturing technologies effective space transportation infrastructure evolved from powerful, reliable Apollo-era and space shuttle propulsion elements. NASA Concept image of Ares V in Earth orbit. (NASA/MSFC) www.nasa.gov The versatile, heavy-lifting Ares V is a two-stage, vertically stacked launch system. The launch vehicle can carry about 287,000 pounds to low Earth orbit and 143,000 pounds to the moon.
    [Show full text]