Monterey-Salinas Transit System Wide Fleet Analysis Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Monterey-Salinas Transit System Wide Fleet Analysis Study Monterey-Salinas Transit System Wide Fleet Analysis Study A Project Completed for MST by CALSTART WAVE White Par Series June 2017 Contents Sections Glossary of Terms ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction – The Potential for Electric Buses ..................................................................................... 9 MST in 2016: By the Numbers ................................................................................................................. 11 Fleet Characteristics ........................................................................................................................... 11 Vehicle OEM ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Vehicle Length ................................................................................................................................... 11 Vehicle Propulsion Type ................................................................................................................... 12 Vehicle Operating Costs ................................................................................................................... 12 MST vs. Nation .................................................................................................................................. 13 Existing Fleet Emissions Inventory: Criteria Air Pollutants ...................................................... 14 Fleet Age: Achieving Emissions Reductions through Attrition ................................................. 16 Existing Fleet Emissions Inventory: Greenhouse Gases ............................................................. 18 MST Duty Cycles ............................................................................................................................... 19 MST History with Electric Vehicles ................................................................................................ 20 Available Vehicle Comparisons ............................................................................................................. 22 Available Electric Transit Buses ...................................................................................................... 22 Available Diesel Hybrid Transit Buses .......................................................................................... 25 Available BEV Charging Options ................................................................................................... 25 Bus Emissions Comparisons ............................................................................................................ 27 Bus Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Comparisons ...................................................................... 31 Electricity Cost for BEV Bus Operation .......................................................................................... 35 Electric Bus Projected Range ............................................................................................................ 36 Vehicle Financing and Incentives .......................................................................................................... 39 Incentive Funding for Alternative Vehicles .................................................................................. 39 Battery Leasing vs. Ownership ........................................................................................................ 40 Recommendations ..................................................................................................................................... 44 Next Steps for Implementing Zero‐Emission Vehicles ............................................................... 44 Depot Charging Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 45 Guidance on Beneficial Electrical Rate Structures with Local Utilities ................................... 45 Purchasing vs. Leasing Bus Batteries .............................................................................................. 46 Viability of Expansion of Use of En‐Route Charging Technology ........................................... 47 Phasing Plan ........................................................................................................................................ 48 Ideas and Concepts for Future Projects .......................................................................................... 51 Sources ......................................................................................................................................................... 53 About the Authors ..................................................................................................................................... 56 Appendix A: Complete MST Transit Vehicle Air Emissions Inventory ......................................... 57 Appendix B: Complete MST (owned & operated) Transit Vehicle Daily Duty Cycle List, Sorted by Mileage...................................................................................................................................... 58 Page | 2 Figures Figure 1: MST’s bus fleet by OEM ........................................................................................................... 11 Figure 2: MST’s bus fleet by length ......................................................................................................... 11 Figure 3: MST’s vehicle fleet by propulsion ........................................................................................... 12 Figure 4: MST owned‐vehicle operating costs per vehicle type ($/mile) ........................................... 12 Figures 5 and 6: U.S. and MST public transit buses by propulsion type ........................................... 14 Figure 7: Estimated MST 2015‐2016 fiscal year transit vehicle air emissions (lbs.) .......................... 16 Figure 8: Decline of public transit diesel bus emissions over time by model year ........................... 17 Figure 9: Comparison of model years for U.S. and MST public transit buses .................................. 17 Figure 10: MST average annual vehicle mileage by model year grouping ....................................... 18 Figure 11: Average annual MST vehicle GHG emissions (metric tons) ............................................. 19 Figure 12: MST weekday daily duty cycle lengths by vehicle type .................................................... 20 Figure 13: Available BEV bus options in 2017 ....................................................................................... 23 Figure 14: Bus pricing and classification according to Washington State Department of Enterprise Services Master Contract, 2015 ........................................................................................................ 24 Figure 15: Available diesel‐electric hybrid bus options in 2017 .......................................................... 25 Figure 16: Various OEM Depot Chargers .............................................................................................. 26 Figure 17: California electric grid generation by source ...................................................................... 27 Figure 18: United States electric grid consumption by source ............................................................ 27 Figure 19: Complete California annual air shed emissions comparison for 2002 diesel, 2007 diesel, 2017 diesel, 2017 biodiesel (B20), 2017 biodiesel (B100), 2017 diesel‐electric hybrid, & 2017 BEV buses ........................................................................................................................................... 29 Figure 20: Mobile‐source annual emissions comparison for 2002 diesel, 2007 diesel, 2017 diesel, 2017 biodiesel (B20), 2017 biodiesel (B100), 2017 diesel‐electric hybrid, & 2017 BEV buses ... 30 Figure 21: Fuel price volatility in the U.S. represented by total % price change 2000 ‐ 2016 .......... 32 Figure 22: Assumptions for TCO comparison between diesel, hybrid, and BEV 40‐foot transit buses .................................................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 23: TCO 12‐year service life comparison between electric, diesel, and hybrid buses .......... 34 Figure 24: The potential impact of demand charges on per mile fuel expenses ............................... 36 Figure 25: Expected daily driving range for currently available 40‐foot BEV transit buses ........... 37 Figure 26: HVIP’s vehicle eligibility list ................................................................................................. 39 Figure 27: LCFS credit revenue from electricity 2016‐2020 at a credit price of $100/MT ................. 40 Figure 28: Battery lease‐buy analysis ...................................................................................................... 43 Page | 3 Section 1 Glossary of Terms Advanced Clean Transit (ACT) Regulation: A proposed regulation by CARB that seeks to transition all California public transit fleets to Zero‐Emissions Bus (ZEB) technology by 2040. Altoona: The Altoona Bus Research and Testing Center was
Recommended publications
  • 1 2021 Electric Truck & Bus Update, Part 2
    2021 Electric Truck & Bus Update, Part 2: Buses By John Benson September 2021 1. Introduction This is Part 2 and focuses on buses. Battery-electric buses are being deployed more rapidly that medium and heavy battery-electric trucks, mainly because of federal and state incentives. A major consideration, especially for electric utility professionals, is that battery-electric buses take a huge amount of energy to charge them. Also many of these vehicles will perform depot recharging en masse. This will be mostly overnight in transit depots. These facilities are currently not prepared for the massive load increase as their vehicles transition to electric operation. The flowing is a description of and link to part 1 of this series: https://energycentral.com/c/ec/2021-electric-truck-bus-update-part-1-trucks The following was the last paper on this subject, which was posted in January. Electric Refuse Trucks & Battery-Electric Buses: This post is a review of both of these two-vehicle types and considerations as they electrify. https://energycentral.com/c/cp/electric-refuse-trucks-battery-electric-buses Section 2 of this report will describe all major manufacturers of buses, their offerings and any new developments by those firms. Section 3 will describe how fleet managers can evaluate and remedy the overload risk described above. 2. Buses A few of the big players in the large-to-medium truck market are also players in the bus market – see the first two below, for instance (see part 1 of this series for truck models for these two manufacturers). Also the third firm below is not only the largest player in the bus market, and a technology leader, but is starting to spin their technologies off into other markets, including trucks 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Viability and Opportunities of School Bus Electrification in Massachusetts
    Clean Ride to School: Viability and Opportunities of School Bus Electrification in Massachusetts by Paola Massoli An Independent Research Capstone in the Field of Sustainability and the Environmental Management For the fulfillment of a Master’s in Liberal Arts at the Harvard University Extension School August 21, 2020 1 Abstract The iconic Yellow Bus system is the largest form of mass transit in the United States, comprising 480,000 buses that carry 25 million children to school every day. And it mostly runs on diesel. Due to the recognized toxicity of diesel exhaust, there have been substantial efforts to deploy cleaner forms of transportation for school children. Over the last 20 years, diesel engine retrofits have significantly reduced air pollutant emissions from heavy-duty vehicles, and alternative fuels such as liquified petroleum gas (LPG) promise to cut such emissions even further. However, none of these technologies eliminates air pollution or the greenhouse gases (GHG) that drive climate change, the greatest global environmental, economic and social threat of our times. Electric school buses offer a solution to address both climate and air quality concerns by eliminating tailpipe emissions, with the additional promise of long-term economic returns due to fuel savings and low maintenance costs. Electric school buses are being deployed at increasing pace, but they are still considered an emerging technology. This project seeks to validate the claims of lifetime cost competitiveness of electric school buses vis a vis the more conventional diesel and LPG vehicles. A total cost of ownership (TCO) model is created to assess under which conditions electric school buses are a favorable technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Company 013230
    PLEASE CONFIRM CSIP ELIGIBILITY ON THE DEALER SITE WITH THE "CSIP ELIGIBILITY COMPANIES" CAN COMPANY 013230 . Muller Inc 022147 110 Sand Campany 014916 1994 Steel Factory Corporation 005004 3 M Company 022447 3d Company Inc. 020170 4 Fun Limousine 021504 412 Motoring Llc 021417 4l Equipment Leasing Llc 022310 5 Star Auto Contruction Inc/Certified Collision Center 019764 5 Star Refrigeration & Ac, Inc. 021821 79411 Usa Inc. 022480 7-Eleven Inc. 024086 7g Distributing Llc 019408 908 Equipment (Dtf) 024335 A & B Business Equipment 022190 A & E Mechanical Inc. 010468 A & E Stores, Inc 018519 A & R Food Service 018553 A & Z Pharmaceutical Llc 005010 A A A - Corp. Only 022494 A A Electric Inc. 022751 A Action Plumbing Inc. 009218 A B C Contracting Co Inc 015111 A B C Parts Intl Inc. 018881 A Blair Enterprises Inc 019044 A Calarusso & Son Inc 020079 A Confidential Transportation, Inc. 022525 A D S Environmental Inc. 005049 A E P Industries 022983 A Folino Contruction Inc. 005054 A G F A Corporation 013841 A J Perri Inc 010814 A La Mode Inc 024394 A Life Style Services Inc. 023059 A Limousine Service Inc. 020129 A M Castle & Company 007372 A O N Corporation 007741 A O Smith Water Products 019513 A One Exterminators Inc 015788 A P S Security Inc 005207 A T & T Corp 022926 A Taste Of Excellence 015051 A Tech Concrete Co. 021962 A Total Plumbing Llc 012763 A V R Realty Company 023788 A Wainer Llc 016424 A&A Company/Shore Point 017173 A&A Limousines Inc 020687 A&A Maintenance Enterprise Inc 023422 A&H Nyc Limo / A&H American Limo 018432 A&M Supernova Pc 019403 A&M Transport ( Dtf) 016689 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Canada Miss the Bus?
    TRACKING THE ENERGY REVOLUTION 2019 Will Canada Miss the Bus? For a country that’s home to leading electric bus makers, Canada is slow to adopt them—it’s a missed opportunity in more ways than one March 2019 Contents 7 3 Missing the bus 4 A city comparison 7 Canadian e-buses 10 The global view 12 Dollars and good sense 14 Looking to the future 15 Endnotes 10 Will Canada Miss the Bus? All rights reserved. Permission is granted to reproduce all or part of this publication for non-commercial purposes, as long as the source is cited Tracking the Energy Revolution 2019 as “Clean Energy Canada.” Clean Energy Canada is a think tank at March 2019 | © 2019 Clean Energy Canada the Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue at Simon Fraser University. ISBN: 978-0-9950609-8-2 Front cover photo: Scott Webb | Back cover photo: Shutterstock 2 CLEAN ENERGY CANADA Missing the bus uses. They’re the veins of our cities, may find it more 7 difficult to keep transporting billions of people around their daily lives. Whether it’s a morning commute, prices low, making a lift home from school, or a trip to the local products less hockey game, buses have been a stalwart part internationally B of Canadian life for decades. appealing. But most Canadian buses also pollute. Yes, they’re better E-buses aren’t than cars because they move more people, but they are necessarily an nonetheless a sizable source of emissions. The good news is expensive option either. With battery prices falling 79% there’s a solution, and it’s a big opportunity for Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Bus Feasibility Study for the City of Edmonton
    I II ELECTRIC BUS FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE CITY OF EDMONTON JUNE 2016 A REPORT PREPARED BY III IV TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 DESCRIPTION OF MANDATE 1:1 1.2 CONCLUSIONS 1:1 1.3 MAIN FINDINGS 1:4 1.3.1 CUSTOMER PERCEPTIONS OF THE E-BUSES 1:4 1.3.2 ETS AND CITY STAFF PERCEPTIONS OF THE E-BUSES 1:4 1.3.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE FIELD TRIALS 1:5 1.3.4 EXPECTED RELIABILITY OF E-BUSES IN SERVICE 1:6 1.3.5 EXTERNALITIES 1:7 1.3.6 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF E-BUSES AT ETS 1:8 1.3.7 THE ELECTRIC BUS TECHNOLOGY AND ITS EVOLUTION 1:9 1.4 THE BUSINESS CASE FOR E-BUSES IN EDMONTON 1:10 1.5 RECOMMENDATIONS 1:13 2 DESCRIPTION OF MANDATE 2.1 OBJECTIVES OF THIS STUDY 2:1 2.2 METHODOLOGY 2:1 2.3 LIMITATIONS OF THIS REPORT 2:2 3 DESCRIPTION OF FIELD TRIALS 3.1 THE ELECTRIC BUSES USED FOR WINTER EVALUATION 3:1 3.2 DURATION AND TIMING OF THE TRIALS 3:4 3.3 DUTY CYCLES OF THE BUSES 3:5 3.4 CLIMATIC CONDITIONS DURING THE TRIALS 3:6 3.5 DATA COLLECTION DURING THE FIELD TRIALS 3:7 3.6 AVAILABILITY OF THE BUSES DURING TRIALS 3:7 3.7 EXTRAORDINARY EVENTS 3:7 3.8 ANALYSIS AND SUMMARY OF TRIALS 3:8 3.8.1 RANGE, STATE OF CHARGE (SOC), ENERGY USAGE (TOTAL TEST AVERAGE) 3:8 3.8.2 TEMPERATURE AND ENERGY USAGE 3:10 3.8.3 ROUTE ANALYSIS 3:13 3.8.4 IMPACT OF SLOPE ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION 3:14 3.8.5 INTERIOR BUS TEMPERATURE ANALYSIS 3:18 3.8.6 OTHER PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS 3:20 3.9 KEY FINDINGS 3:21 4 CUSTOMER PERCEPTIONS OF THE E-BUSES 4.1 METHODOLOGY 4:1 4.2 E-BUS RIDER PERCEPTIONS (AS MEASURED DURING TRIALS) 4:2 4.2.1 BUS MODEL 4:2 4.2.2 NOTICED A DIFFERENT DESIGN
    [Show full text]
  • Official Qualifying Results for Split Start
    Official Qualifying Results for Split Start Bert Olson Double National Sorted on Best Lap time G5-GT1, GT2, GT3, T1, T2, AS, STO GingerMan Raceway 2.140 Miles Qualifying 7/8/2012 10:20 AM Qualifying started at 10:20:12 Pos No. PIC Class Name Hometown Reg Mem# Make-Model Sponser Laps Best Tm 1 31 1 GT1 Dave Ruehlow Oconomowoc WI Milw 353465 Ford Mustang 10 1:34.461 2 50 1 GT2 Tom Patton Hamilton OH CIN 62167 Sunbeam Tiger Tire Discounters/RedLine Oil/Go 6 1:34.873 3 97 1 T1 Tom Sloe Newbury OH NEO 280767 Chevrolet Corvette Hutter Racing Eng/Hoosier/Russ 4 1:36.760 4 66 2 GT2 David Finch Ann Arbor MI DET 46577 Porsche 944 Raetech Motorsports 6 1:37.252 5 76 1 GT3 Mike Cyphert Twinsburg OH NEO 65827 Toyota Celica Toyota Motorsports/TRD; RedLin 4 1:37.308 6 44 2 GT3 Joe Kristensen London Ont DET 294854 Acura RSX 14 1:37.920 7 20 2 GT1 Thomas G Stanford Orland Park IL BVR 99040 Chevrolet Camaro Pote-Stanford Reporting 8 1:38.388 8 78 3 GT3 Rob Warkocki Frankfort IL CHI 119077 Mazda RX7 TRO Manufacturing/Goodyear/M 6 1:38.790 9 91 4 GT3 Ken Nelson Novi MI DET 131726 Nissan 200SX 7 1:40.742 10 5 1 T2 William Moore Chagrin Falls OH NEO 240488_01 Pontiac Solstice 3 1:42.685 11 3 2 T2 Todd Napieralski Chelsea MI DET 399680 Chevrolet Camaro SS Total Performance Racing 7 1:43.371 12 82 5 GT3 John Mills Wayne OH OVR 99051 Mazda Miata Racer Parts Wholesale 11 1:44.873 13 45 6 GT3 Dave Dobry Plymouth MI DET 110908 Dodge Daytona Dryer Vent Wizzard 5 1:49.924 14 33 1 STO Craig Anderson Dundee IL BVR 313293 Chevrolet Corvette z06 Hoosier/CobaltFriction/Blackdog
    [Show full text]
  • Total 2017 HIRES Final
    Hire Heroes USA Confirmed Hires for all of 2017 (Last) Service Service Rank Other Hiring Company Name Position Hired For Army CW-2 Special Security Officer Navy CW-4 Black Knight Financial Services IT Production Manager Army CW-4 ASM Research Benefits Lead Army 0-1 General Dynamics Manufacturing Engineer Army 0-1 Scribe America Medical Scribe Gwinnett County Office of Strategy & Army 0-1 Performance Mgmt. Business Analyst Marines 0-1 Campus Hollywood Instructor- Theater History and Acting Air Force 0-1 Global Threat & Risk Analyst Navy 0-1 Advanced Systems Development Help Desk Specialist Army 0-1 Fountain Middle School History Teacher Army W-5 United Airlines Pilot Marines W-5 San Diego Passport Agency Passport Support Associate Army W-5 Selective Service System Program Analyst Marines W-5 Ulta Beauty Warehouse Manager Army W-5 DOD Pilot Military Program Analyst-Organization Army W-5 US Army DOD and Personnel Force Development Army W-5 NES Associates Technical Director Army W-5 Program Manager Army W-5 AFS Army Fleet Service Test Flight Pilot Army W-5 Investigator Navy W-5 R3 Strategic support Group Manager Army W-5 AFSC/Magellan Federal Training Center Manager Navy W-5 Naval Systems Incorporated Senior Logistics Analyst Army W-5 Aviation Specialties Unlimited Aviator Marines W-5 District Manager Army W-4 TFW - Tsay Ferguson-Williams Deputy Project Manager Army W-4 CACI International Lessons Learned Analyst Army W-4 Colorado Springs Police Department Criminal Investigator Navy W-4 Naval Air Station Patuxent River Logistical Engineer
    [Show full text]
  • 30 Nov Hires Report
    Hire Heroes USA Confirmed Hires 2017 Through November 30 Service (Last) Branch Service Rank Other Hiring Company Name Position Hired For Army CW-2 Special Security Officer Navy CW-4 Black Knight Financial Services IT Production Manager Army CW-4 ASM Research Benefits Lead Army 0-1 General Dynamics Manufacturing Engineer Army 0-1 Scribe America Medical Scribe Gwinnett County Office of Strategy & Army 0-1 Performance Mgmt. Business Analyst Marines 0-1 Campus Hollywood Instructor- Theater History and Acting Air Force 0-1 Global Threat & Risk Analyst Navy 0-1 Advanced Systems Development Help Desk Specialist Army W-5 United Airlines Pilot Marines W-5 San Diego Passport Agency Passport Support Associate Army W-5 Selective Service System Program Analyst Marines W-5 Ulta Beauty Warehouse Manager Army W-5 DOD Pilot Military Program Analyst-Organization and Personnel Force Development Army W-5 US Army DOD Directorate Army W-5 NES Associates Technical Director Army W-5 Program Manager Army W-5 AFS Army Fleet Service Test Flight Pilot Army W-5 Investigator Navy W-5 R3 Strategic support Group Manager Army W-5 AFSC/Magellan Federal Training Center Manager Navy W-5 Naval Systems Incorporated Senior Logistics Analyst Army W-5 Aviation Specialties Unlimited Aviator Marines W-5 District Manager Army W-4 TFW - Tsay Ferguson-Williams Deputy Project Manager Army W-4 CACI International Lessons Learned Analyst Army W-4 Colorado Springs Police Department Criminal Investigator Army W-4 Intel Corporation D1D Manufacturing Technician Army W-4 Erickson Air Crane
    [Show full text]
  • As of 5/31/2019 First Name Last Name Company Type Company Name
    As of 5/31/2019 First Name Last Name Company Type Company Name City State/Territory Charlotte G. O'Rourke Advertising/Marketing Agency Accelerate Marketing Business Solutions Oshawa ON Gina Lopez Manufacturer Fumoto Engineering of America Santa Rosa CA Dorota Trebicka Manufacturer Fumoto Engineering of America Santa Rosa CA Spring Jones Manufacturer Nitro Gear & Axle Atlanta GA Katrina Faris Manufacturer Trail Forged Rohnert Park CA Carol Torrez Manufacturer Wheelskins Inc. Berkeley CA Lyn Dugan Truck Accessory Retailer Custom Covers Company, LLC Topeka KS Kristen Bolte Manufacturer Covercraft Industries LLC Pauls Valley OK David Behlings Manufacturer Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A. Foothill Ranch CA Paul Golde Warehouse/Multiline Distributor Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A. Foothill Ranch CA Greg Lasiewski Manufacturer Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A. Foothill Ranch CA Sandra Wyatt Manufacturer Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A. Foothill Ranch CA Jan Mansfield Manufacturer GiantGear USA Laurel NE Teppy Wigington Manufacturer LINE-X Spray-on Truck Bedliners Huntsville AL Charlotte G. O'Rourke Retailer Burning Rubber Tire and Speed Oakville ON Mark Dixxon Restorer Riggs Fabrication & Restoration Fort Worth TX David Knapp Restorer Riggs Fabrication & Restoration Fort Worth TX Jay Riggs Restorer Riggs Fabrication & Restoration Fort Worth TX Shari Riggs Restorer Riggs Fabrication & Restoration Fort Worth TX Leo Thorsen Restorer Riggs Fabrication & Restoration Fort Worth TX Heather Mills Manufacturer Energy Suspension San Clemente CA Janet Tang Manufacturer Launch Tech USA Ontario CA Crissy Niese Tire Dealer Tire Discounters Cincinnati OH Jason Geathers Installer/Restyler BOP Protective Film Solutions Naples FL Reinaldo Rivera Warehouse/Multiline Distributor Street Unlimited Orlando FL Annie Last Manufacturer Hawk Performance Solon OH Lindsey Nikolai Manufacturer Hawk Performance Solon OH Sara Williams Manufacturer Let's Go Aero Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • HUNTER Highlights Copyright © 2012 Hunter Engineering Company 11250 Hunter Drive Form 2880-T (V152), 12/12 Bridgeton, Missouri 63044 U.S.A
    2012 : volume 152 HUNTER www.hunter.com News and Trends highlights of the Automotive Industry Hunter Quick Check™ System 3-minute inspection process shown at SEMA Coming this spring, Hunter’s single- process Quick Check™ system performs a comprehensive vehicle inspection in under three minutes. By gathering valuable information about a vehicle’s alignment, brake performance, battery health, emissions, and tire health, Quick Check allows shops to check every car that comes to the service lane, increasing revenue and improving customer retention. battery tester battery tester tire tread battery tester battery tire tread tester brakes tire tread tire tread Hunter Northeast Division Manager Doug Woolvertonbrakes gives a Quick Check inspection system demonstration, resulting in a color-coded printout that outlines vehicle health issues. alignment brakes battery tester brakes alignment data alignment tire tread connection alignment data battery connection tester ✔ Fast verification of alignment need ✔ Wheels tested individually ✔ Tests battery to OEM specs tire pressure data brakes ✔ Boost traffic to most profitable connection ✔ Tests brake force at each wheel ✔ Tests and sends results wirelessly undercar service and overall vehicle deceleration to console in just ten seconds data tire pressure tire tread connection tire pressure alignment tire pressure brakes data connection ✔ Retrieves emission codes ✔ Integrated inflation hoses ✔ Quick and easy tire wear check ✔ Wirelessly transfers important ✔ Automatically fills or bleeds alignment ✔ Conditions transmitted to vehicle information to console tires to OEM specification console automatically tire pressure data connection tire pressure SEMA 2012 Hunter debuts state-of-the-art exhibition booth In October, at the annual SEMA Show in Las Vegas, Hunter debuted a 7,000-square-foot exhibition booth to display a variety of Hunter’s industry- leading products.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Available Zero-Emission Technologies 2.0
    Summary of Available Zero-Emission Technologies 2.0 Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 2 I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Overview of Regulatory Framework & Incentives ................................................................................ 4 Table 1. Equipment/Vehicle Type and Applicable Regulation and Incentives...................................... 4 III. Technology Readiness Levels of Zero-Emission Vehicles and Equipment ........................................ 5 Table 2. Summary Status of Zero-Emissions Technologies in the Heavy-Duty Sector.......................... 5 Table 3. Technology Readiness Level of Buses and Considerations for Widespread Adoption ........... 6 Table 4. Technology Readiness Levels of Cargo Handling Equipment and Considerations/ Challenges .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Table 5. Technology Readiness Levels of Construction Equipment and Considerations/ Challenges .. 8 Table 6. Technology Readiness Levels of Airport Ground Support Equipment and Considerations/ Challenges ............................................................................................................................................. 9
    [Show full text]
  • Electrification of Transportation Strategic Roadmap
    March 29, 2018 The Honorable Chair and Members of the Hawai 'i Public Utilities Commission ZOIB MAR 2CJ P 2: Li t; Kekuanaoa Building, 1st Floor PLJr' 1 iT'L 1··1·T--:c- 465 South King Street PU• ;.) ··' \,) j I ' .LJ ( ,. ('; ~ ....·' ~ l r:' :""· '·"' r- I I1 r'~~ I Honolulu, Hawai 'i 96813 . .. , I . , -..~· ..__) I ...... 1 Dear Commissioners: Subject: Docket No. 2016-0168 EV-F and EV-U Pilot Extension Electrification of Transportation Strategic Roadmap In accordance with Decision and Order Nci. 34592, 1 filed June 2, 2017 in the subject proceeding, the Hawaiian Electric Companies'2 respectfully submit their Electrification of Transportation ("EoT") Strategic Roadmap ("Roadmap"). The Roadmap represents a straightforward guide, based on input from stakeholders, transportation and technical experts, policymakers, non-government organizations and perhaps most importantly, customers, for turning the Companies' transportation transformation plans into actions. The Roadmap describes a number of steps to accelerate the EoT, including: (1) increasing electric vehicle ("EV") adoption by helping to lower costs and educating customers; (2) accelerating the buildout of EV charging infrastructure; (3) supporting the electrification of buses and other heavy equipment; (4) incentivizing EV charging to align with grid needs and save drivers and utility customers money; and (5) coordinating with ongoing grid modernization and planning efforts to help maximize the use of renewable resources. With these and other actions described in the Roadmap, the State can enhance its energy security and accelerate its transition from fossil fuels to renewable resources, both for the production of electricity and for ground transportation, while at the same time helping to facilitate more renewable resources online and helping to lower energy costs for customers.
    [Show full text]