DOCSLIB.ORG

Ajai Wildlife Reserve

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MINISTRY OF TOURISM, TRADE AND INDUSTRY (MTTI) UGANDA WILDLIFE AUTHORITY AJAI WILDLIFE RESERVE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 2007 – 2017 Preamble Uganda Wildlife Authority prepared this General Management Plan with funds from World Bank through the Protected Area Management and Sustainable Use project (PAMSU) and other internally generated funds. Prepared by Uganda Wildlife Authority: Tourism, Business Development and Planning Department Edited by Damian Akankwasa Eunice Nyiramahoro Layout and design Edgar Buhanga Richard Kapere Justine Namara Cover Photographs Upper photo: Cassia woodlot planted by the Former Chief Ajai Bottom photo: Beautiful Scenery at Eramve hill (proposed campground scenery) ii Approval The Uganda Wildlife Authority Board of Trustees approved this General Management Plan for implementation at its sitting of 23rd January 2007. John Nagenda Chairman Board of Trustees ..... Moses Mapesa Executive Director 2007 iii Foreword Preparation of General Management Plans (GMPs) for Protected Areas is a statutory requirement. Uganda Wildlife Authority recognises the importance of planning as a management tool and is systematically preparing GMPs for all its Protected Areas (PA’s) to realise their potential in tourism development, biodiversity conservation and contribute towards poverty reduction. So far all the 10 National Parks have GMPs in addition to some Wildlife Reserves. This General Management Plan is therefore aimed at providing Ajai Wildlife Reserve with guidance towards sustainable management of the ecosystem as well as proper development of management infrastructure and tourism facilities. The mission of Uganda Wildlife Authority is to “conserve and sustainably manage the wildlife and protected areas in partnership with neighbouring communities and other stakeholders for the benefit of the people of Uganda and the global community”. Accordingly, GMPs for wildlife-protected areas are prepared with full stakeholder participation. The preparation of this plan was through a multidisciplinary and consultative approach involving various stakeholders at community, district and national levels to ensure that all relevant issues are adequately addressed. The Planning Team itself that prepared this GMP was composed of UWA staff as well as other stakeholders from the local government (both political and technical). The UWA Board of Trustees after careful review have also endorsed the implementation of this plan by their approval at their sitting on 23rd January 2007 held in Kidepo Valley National Park. This plan that is therefore a product of wide consultations, will enjoy the support of all stakeholders, to enhance the conservation and management of Ajai Wildlife Reserve for the benefit and enjoyment of the present and future generations. It is therefore with great pleasure that I now entrust the Chief Warden of Murchison Falls Conservation Area in general and the Warden in Charge of Ajai Wildlife Reserve in particular, with the authority to implement this General Management Plan. Moses Mapesa EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR iv Acknowledgements Uganda Wildlife Authority acknowledges World Bank through Protected Area Management and Sustainable Use Project (PAMSU) for contributing financial support to the preparation of this General Management Plan (GMP). Special thanks go to the following people who were members of the planning team and worked tirelessly to prepare this GMP: Planning team members 1. Kapere Richard (SPEIAO) (Team Leader) UWA Headquarter 2. Justine Namara (SPEIAO) UWA Headquarter 3. Asalu Edward (CW) MFCA 4. Wakhanyinywa Pascal (WLE) MFCA 5. Nakayenze Christine (WT) MFCA 6. Kato Stonewall (SWCC) (Co- team leader) MFCA 7. Mbogha F.Kambasu (AWIC) Ajai WR 8. Guma Scot (CCR) Ajai WR 9. Okwonga Aballo (LER) Ajai WR 10. Agobia H Ejoa (Fisheries Officer) Ogoko Sub County 11. Ali Jimmy (CPI representative) Ajai WR 12. Draga-Francis (Sec. Prod. & Marketing) L.C.V Arua 13. Adribo Edison (DFO) Arua 14. Odipio A Edward (DEO) Arua Mr. Damian Akankwasa, Ms. Eunice Mahoro and Mr. Edgar Buhanga provided oversight of the whole planning process and their effort is greatly appreciated. UWA appreciates the contributions of all her staff, partners, stakeholders, local communities and members of the Board of Trustees who were involved in one way or the other in preparation of this plan. v Table of Contents Preamble ......................................................................................................... ii Approval .......................................................................................................... iii Foreword ......................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements .......................................................................................... v Table of Contents ............................................................................................ vi List of abbreviations ......................................................................................... x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................. 1 Background .................................................................................................. 2 General Management Planning Process ...................................................... 2 Conservation Values of Ajai ......................................................................... 3 Management Purpose of Conserving Ajai WR ............................................. 5 Zoning Plan .................................................................................................. 5 Management programmes and Actions ........................................................ 6 Financial projections/estimates .................................................................... 6 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 7 1.1 Purpose of the Plan ........................................................................... 8 1.2 AWR Planning Process ..................................................................... 8 1.3 Enabling Policy and Legislation ......................................................... 9 1.3.1 The Constitution of Uganda (1995) .................................................. 9 1.3.2 The Uganda Wildlife Policy (1999 Draft) .......................................... 9 1.3.3 The Uganda Wildlife Act Cap 200 of The Laws of Uganda 2000 ... 10 1.3.4 The National Environment Act Cap 153 of The Laws of Uganda 2000 ........................................................................................................ 10 1.3.5 The Tourism Policy of Uganda 2003 .............................................. 10 1.3.6 The National Forestry and Tree Planting Act, 2003 ....................... 10 1.3.7 The Wetlands Policy 1995 ............................................................. 11 1.3.8 International Conventions and agreements ................................... 11 1.4 Description of Ajai Wildlife Reserve ................................................. 12 1.4.1 Historical perspective ..................................................................... 12 1.4.2 Location and Access ..................................................................... 13 1.4.3 Rainfall ........................................................................................... 15 1.4.4 Vegetation ...................................................................................... 15 1.4.5 Fauna............................................................................................. 15 1.4.6 Socio economic background .......................................................... 16 1.5 Conservation Values of Ajai WR ...................................................... 17 1.5.1 Habitat for the white Rhino ............................................................. 17 1.5.2 Historical and Cultural values ........................................................ 17 1.5.3 Nile wetland systems and water catchments ................................. 18 1.5.4 Pro conservation cultural heritage ................................................. 19 1.5.5 Flora and Fauna ............................................................................ 19 1.6 Purpose of AWR .............................................................................. 19 1.6.1 Background .................................................................................... 19 1.6.2 Statement of purpose for AWR ...................................................... 20 2. THE ZONE PLAN ...................................................................................... 21 2.1 Zones............................................................................................... 23 vi 2.2 Rationale for Zoning ......................................................................... 23 2.3 Wilderness Zone .............................................................................. 26 2.4 Integrated Resource Use Zone ......................................................... 27 2.5 Tourism Zone .................................................................................... 28 2.6 Administrative Zone .......................................................................... 29 3. MANAGEMENT PROGRAMMES .............................................................. 30 3.1 RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT.................... 31 3.1.1 Stakeholder awareness ................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda

    Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda

    POPULATION, DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF SITATUNGA (TRAGELAPHUS SPEKEI) (SCLATER) IN SELECTED WETLANDS IN UGANDA Biological -Life history Biological -Ecologicl… Protection -Regulation of… 5 Biological -Dispersal Protection -Effectiveness… 4 Biological -Human tolerance Protection -proportion… 3 Status -National Distribtuion Incentive - habitat… 2 Status -National Abundance Incentive - species… 1 Status -National… Incentive - Effect of harvest 0 Status -National… Monitoring - confidence in… Status -National Major… Monitoring - methods used… Harvest Management -… Control -Confidence in… Harvest Management -… Control - Open access… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -Aim… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Tragelaphus spekii (sitatunga) NonSubmitted Detrimental to Findings (NDF) Research and Monitoring Unit Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) Plot 7 Kira Road Kamwokya, P.O. Box 3530 Kampala Uganda Email/Web - [email protected]/ www.ugandawildlife.org Prepared By Dr. Edward Andama (PhD) Lead consultant Busitema University, P. O. Box 236, Tororo Uganda Telephone: 0772464279 or 0704281806 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Final Report i January 2019 Contents ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND GLOSSARY .......................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... viii 1.1Background ...........................................................................................................................
  • Important Bird Areas in Uganda. Status and Trends 2008

    Important Bird Areas in Uganda. Status and Trends 2008

    IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS IN UGANDA Status and Trends 2008 NatureUganda The East Africa Natural History Society Important Bird Areas in Uganda Status and Trends 2008 Compiled by: Michael Opige Odull and Achilles Byaruhanga Edited by: Ambrose R. B Mugisha and Julius Arinaitwe Map illustrations by: David Mushabe Graphic designs by: Some Graphics Ltd January 2009 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non commercial purposes is authorized without further written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Production of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written notice of the copyright holder. Citation: NatureUganda (2009). Important Bird Areas in Uganda, Status and Trends 2008. Copyright © NatureUganda – The East Africa Natural History Society About NatureUganda NatureUganda is a Non Governmental Organization working towards the conservation of species, sites and habitats not only for birds but other taxa too. It is the BirdLife partner in Uganda and a member of IUCN. The organization is involved in various research, conservation and advocacy work in many sites across the country. These three pillars are achieved through conservation projects, environmental education programmes and community involvement in conservation among others. All is aimed at promoting the understanding, appreciation and conservation of nature. For more information please contact: NatureUganda The East Africa Natural History Society Plot 83 Tufnell Drive, Kamwokya. P.O.Box 27034, Kampala Uganda Email [email protected] Website: www.natureuganda.org DISCLAIMER This status report has been produced with financial assistance of the European Union (EuropeAid/ ENV/2007/132-278. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of Birdlife International and can under no normal circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.
  • Vote:022 Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities

    Vote:022 Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities

    Vote Performance Report Financial Year 2018/19 Vote:022 Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities QUARTER 4: Highlights of Vote Performance V1: Summary of Issues in Budget Execution Table V1.1: Overview of Vote Expenditures (UShs Billion) Approved Cashlimits Released Spent by % Budget % Budget % Releases Budget by End Q4 by End Q 4 End Q4 Released Spent Spent Recurrent Wage 2.086 1.043 2.086 1.989 100.0% 95.3% 95.3% Non Wage 7.259 3.621 6.775 6.765 93.3% 93.2% 99.9% Devt. GoU 6.082 2.783 5.470 5.470 89.9% 89.9% 100.0% Ext. Fin. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% GoU Total 15.426 7.447 14.330 14.224 92.9% 92.2% 99.3% Total GoU+Ext Fin 15.426 7.447 14.330 14.224 92.9% 92.2% 99.3% (MTEF) Arrears 0.364 0.364 0.364 0.364 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Total Budget 15.790 7.811 14.694 14.588 93.1% 92.4% 99.3% A.I.A Total 85.005 0.033 154.197 83.589 181.4% 98.3% 54.2% Grand Total 100.795 7.843 168.892 98.177 167.6% 97.4% 58.1% Total Vote Budget 100.431 7.479 168.528 97.813 167.8% 97.4% 58.0% Excluding Arrears Table V1.2: Releases and Expenditure by Program* Billion Uganda Shillings Approved Released Spent % Budget % Budget %Releases Budget Released Spent Spent Program: 1901 Tourism, Wildlife Conservation and 95.02 163.47 92.78 172.0% 97.6% 56.8% Museums Program: 1949 General Administration, Policy and Planning 5.41 5.06 5.04 93.5% 93.0% 99.5% Total for Vote 100.43 168.53 97.81 167.8% 97.4% 58.0% Matters to note in budget execution Although the approved budget for the Vote was Ushs 100.4 billion, a total of Ushs 168 billion was realized/released.
  • Important Bird Areas: Towards Implement Aichi Targets 11

    Important Bird Areas: Towards Implement Aichi Targets 11

    Important Bird Areas: Towards Implement Aichi Targets 11 CBD workshop, Livingstone Zambia Meeting Aichi Target 11 • A key element of Aichi Target 11 is the call to increase the coverage of P.A • Areas of biologically significant should be a priority when expanding P.A coverage • How can the key sites be identified? ‘Key Biodiversity Areas’ – sites of global significance for biodiversity conservation. Meeting Aichi Target 11 • KBA identify the most important sites for biodiversity within a country or region • KBA are identified using globally standardized criteria • Inform the selection of sites for protection under national legislation www.ibat-alliance.org/ibat- conservation Meeting Aichi Target 11 Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas(IBAs) – are KBAs identified using information on birds Over 12, 000 IBAs have been identified, Mapped and documented by BirdLife International Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas www.birdlife.org/datazone Marine IBAs: the marine e-atlas 3000 sites in 150 countries and on high seas – 6.5% of the oceans IBAs are a basis for PA gap analysis PROTECTED AREA GAPS FOR UGANDA’S IBAS by Achilles Byaruhanga c/o NatureUganda, P. O. Box 27037, Kampala e-mail: [email protected] Uganda has 30 Important Bird Areas IBAs). 10 of the IBAs are national parks, 3 are wildlife reserves, 8 are forest reserves and 9 Analysis unprotected sites. Important Bird Areas contain significant populations of particular bird species that trigger their identification, and the IBA network Importance for birds ranked on a scale of 1-4 incorporates the existing Protected Areas network. In this analysis, IBAs have been used to obtain a better picture of where the important Rapid assessment of threats with scores ranked on a scale of 1-4 where; gaps really are in coverage for particular bird species.
  • Management Effectiveness, Governance, and Social

    Management Effectiveness, Governance, and Social

    Management Effectiveness, Governance, and Social Assessments of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa A rapid inventory and analysis to support the BIOPAMA programme and partners August, 2019 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has been produced with support of the 11th EDF and does not necessarily reflect the views of European Union nor of the ACP Group of States. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. Published by:BIOPAMA Programme, IUCN ESARO Copyright: © 2019 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Campese, J. & Sulle, E. (2019). Management Effectiveness, Governance, and Social Assessments of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa: A rapid inventory and analysis to support the BIOPAMA programme and partners. BIOPAMA, IUCN ESARO. Layout by PENROSE CDB Photos: Christine Mentzel, free
  • Terrestrial Kbas in the Great Lakes Region (Arranged Alphabetically)

    Terrestrial Kbas in the Great Lakes Region (Arranged Alphabetically)

    Appendix 1. Terrestrial KBAs in the Great Lakes Region (arranged alphabetically) Terrestrial KBAs Country Map No.1 Area (ha) Protect AZE3 Pressure Biological Other Action CEPF ion2 Priority4 funding5 Priority6 EAM7 Ajai Wildlife Reserve Uganda 1 15,800 **** medium 4 1 3 Akagera National Park Rwanda 2 100,000 *** medium 3 3 3 Akanyaru wetlands Rwanda 3 30,000 * high 4 0 2 Bandingilo South Sudan 4 1,650,000 **** unknown 4 3 3 Bangweulu swamps (Mweru ) Zambia 5 1,284,000 *** high 4 3 2 Belete-Gera Forest Ethiopia 6 152,109 **** unknown 3 3 3 Y Bonga forest Ethiopia 7 161,423 **** medium 2 3 3 Y Budongo Forest Reserve Uganda 8 79,300 **** medium 2 3 3 Y Bugoma Central Forest Uganda 9 40,100 low 2 3 3 **** Y Reserve Bugungu Wildlife Reserve Uganda 10 47,300 **** medium 4 3 3 Y Bulongwa Forest Reserve Tanzania 11 203 **** unknown 4 0 3 Y Burigi - Biharamulo Game Tanzania 12 350,000 unknown 4 0 3 **** Reserves Bururi Forest Nature Reserve Burundi 13 1,500 **** medium 3 1 3 Y Busia grasslands Kenya 14 250 * very high 4 1 2 Bwindi Impenetrable National Uganda 15 32,700 low 1 3 3 **** Y Park 1 See Basin level maps in Appendix 6. 2 Categorised * <10% protected; ** 10-49% protected; *** 50-90% protected: **** >90% protected. 3 Alliaqnce for Zero Extinction site (Y = yes). See section 2.2.2. 4 See Section 9.2. 5 0 – no funding data; 1 – some funding up to US$50k allocated; 2 – US$50-US$250k; 3 – >US$250k.
  • Geolocator Tracking of Great Reed-Warblers (Acrocephalus

    Geolocator Tracking of Great Reed-Warblers (Acrocephalus

    Geolocator tracking of Great Reed-Warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) identifies key regions for migratory wetland specialists in the Middle East and sub- Saharan East Africa Author(s): Joshua J. Horns, Evan Buechley, Mark Chynoweth, Lale Aktay, Emrah Çoban, Mehmet Ali Kırpık, Jordan M. Herman, Yakup Şaşmaz, and Çağan H. Şekercioğlu Source: The Condor, 118(4):835-849. Published By: American Ornithological Society https://doi.org/10.1650/CONDOR-16-63.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1650/CONDOR-16-63.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Volume 118, 2016, pp. 835–849 DOI: 10.1650/CONDOR-16-63.1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Geolocator tracking of Great Reed-Warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) identifies key regions for migratory wetland specialists in the Middle East and sub-Saharan East Africa Joshua J. Horns,1* Evan Buechley,1 Mark Chynoweth,1 Lale Aktay,2 EmrahCoban, ¸ 3 Mehmet Ali Kırpık,4 Jordan M.
  • Killing Nature to Save It? an Analysis of Two Sport Hunting Policy Arrangements in Uganda

    Killing Nature to Save It? an Analysis of Two Sport Hunting Policy Arrangements in Uganda

    Killing nature to save it? An analysis of two sport hunting policy arrangements in Uganda Amos Ochieng Thesis committee Promotor Prof. Dr V.R. van der Duim Personal Chair at the Cultural Geography Group Wageningen University & Research Co-promotor Dr I.J. Visseren-Hamakers Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Science and Policy George Mason University, Virginia, USA Other members Prof. Dr D. Vanneste, University of Leuven, Belgium Dr M. Ros-Tonen, University of Amsterdam Prof. Dr H. van Dijk, Wageningen University & Research Dr M. Lamers, Wageningen University & Research This research was conducted under the auspices of the Wageningen Graduate School of Social Sciences ii Killing nature to save it? An analysis of two sport hunting policy arrangements in Uganda Amos Ochieng Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. Dr A.P.J. Mol in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Tuesday 19 February 2019 at 1:30 p.m. in the Aula. Amos Ochieng Killing nature to save it? An analysis of two sport hunting policy arrangements in Uganda 164 pages PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands (2019) With references, with summaries in English, and Dutch ISBN: 978-94-6343-565-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18174/466995 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The completion of this PhD would not have been possible without the tireless contributions of the people I will recognize below. First and foremost, I sincerely thank Wageningen University and Research for awarding me a scholarship to pursue this PhD study.
  • Vote:022 Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities

    Vote:022 Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities

    Tourism, Trade and Industry Vote Budget Framework Paper FY 2018/19 Vote:022 Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities V1: Vote Overview (i) Snapshot of Medium Term Budget Allocations Table V1.1: Overview of Vote Expenditures Billion Uganda Shillings FY2016/17 FY2017/18 FY2018/19 MTEF Budget Projections Approved Spent by Proposed 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 Outturn Budget End Sep Budget Recurrent Wage 1.576 1.952 0.388 1.952 2.147 2.254 2.367 2.485 Non Wage 6.808 7.822 1.380 7.587 9.257 10.645 12.774 15.329 Devt. GoU 11.261 6.239 0.245 6.239 7.612 9.134 9.134 9.134 Ext. Fin. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 GoU Total 19.645 16.013 2.014 15.778 19.015 22.034 24.275 26.949 Total GoU+Ext Fin 19.645 16.013 2.014 15.778 19.015 22.034 24.275 26.949 (MTEF) A.I.A Total 64.501 71.692 14.603 77.147 79.975 83.247 85.838 88.492 Grand Total 84.147 87.705 16.617 92.925 98.991 105.281 110.113 115.441 (ii) Vote Strategic Objective a. To enhance regulation, coordination and management of the tourism sector To develop and diversify the tourism products and services; b. To develop tourism infrastructure and facilities; c. To promote and market the destination in national, regional and international markets; d. To develop human resource and institutional capacity for the tourism sector; e.
  • National Large Carnivore Conservation

    National Large Carnivore Conservation

    Strategic Action Plan for Large Carnivore Conservation in Uganda ==== 2010-2020 1 Acknowledgements We are grateful to the people who participated from the following institutions and who contributed to this Action Plan: • Game Trails Safaris • Makerere University Biological Field Station • Makerere University Department of Zoology • Makerere University Wildlife and Animal Resource Management • Ministry of Tourism, Trade and Industry • Panthera Foundation • Uganda Wildlife Authority • Wildlife Conservation Society • World Wide Fund for Nature • Zoological Society of London We are also very grateful to Panthera Foundation, Daniel K. Thorne Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and Wildlife Conservation Society who funded the development of this plan. Photographs in this plan were supplied by Andrew Plumptre and Jan Broekhuis. 2 Table of contents Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................................2 Table of Contents....................................................................................................................................3 Abbreviations..........................................................................................................................................4 Foreward................................................................................................................................................5 Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................6
  • RED LIST of THREATENED SPECIES in UGANDA Availability This Publication Is Available in Hardcopy from MTWA

    RED LIST of THREATENED SPECIES in UGANDA Availability This Publication Is Available in Hardcopy from MTWA

    © 2018 RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES IN UGANDA Availability This publication is available in hardcopy from MTWA. A fee may be charged for persons or institutions that may wish to obtain hard copies. It can also be downloaded from the MTWA website: www.tourism.go.ug Copies are available for reference at the following libraries: MTWA Library Public Libraries Suggested citation MTWA (2018). Red List of Threatened Species of Uganda 2018, Ministry of Wildlife, Tourism and Antiquities (MTWA) Kampala. Copyright © 2018 MTWA MINISTRY OF WILDLIFE, TOURISM AND ANTIQUITIES P.O. Box 4241 Kampala, Uganda www.tourism.go.ug [email protected] © RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES IN UGANDA 2018 Ministry of Wildlife, Tourism and Antiquities Foreword Uganda is a signatory to several international conventions that relate to the conservation of all biodiversity in the country such as the Convention on Biological Diversity, Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species and Cartagena protocol all intended for the benefit local communities and global community. Species are disappearing due to various pressures on natural resources. Due to human population increasing trends and development pressures, previously intact habitats both protected and on private land have been converted, cleared and/or degraded leading to a decline in species population and diversity. The effects of climate change, which are hard to forecast in terms of pace and pattern, will probably also accelerate extinctions in unknown ways. Studies have been conducted to tally the number of species of animals, plants and fungi that still exist globally. However the estimates normally produced are based on the International Union of Conservation of Nature criterion that at times overshadows the national scales.
  • Uwa Annual Corporate Report 2019

    Uwa Annual Corporate Report 2019

    CORPORATE REPORT 2019 Conserving for Generations CORPORATE REPORT 2019 Published by : Uganda Wildlife Authority 7 Kira Road Kamwokya P.O.Box, Kampala Uganda Tel: +256 414 355 000 Fax: +256 414 546 291 Email: [email protected] www.ugandawildlife.org ugandawildlifeauthority ugandawildlife © 2019 Uganda Wildlife Authority Table Of Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS I WORD FROM THE CHAIRMAN BOARD OF TRUSTEES II STATEMENT FROM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR III UGANDA WILDLIFE AUTHORITY 8TH BOARD OF TRUSTEE IV UGANDA WILDLIFE AUTHORITY TOP MANAGEMENT V 01 RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT 1 02 ECOLOGICAL MONITORING AND RESEARCH 11 03 COMMUNITY CONSERVATION 14 04 TOURISM DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY 24 05 CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT 31 06 GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE AFFAIRS 35 07 REVENUE PERFORMANCE 44 CHALLENGES 46 Abbreviations and Acronyms AUTO Association Of Uganda Tour Operators WCS Wildlife Conservation Society AWF African Wildlife Fund WR Wildlife Reserve BINP Bwindi Impenetrable National Park WUR Wildlife Use Rights BMCA Bwindi Mgahinga Conservation Area CTPH Conservation through Public Health CA Conservation Area IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature CC Community Conservation ICGP International Gorilla Conservation Programme CEDP Competiveness and Enterprise Development Project ITFC Institute of Tropical Forest Conservation CPF Central Processing Facility BMCT Bwindi Mgahinga Conservation Trust CWA Community Wildlife Association UPDF Uganda Peoples’ Defence Force CWS Community Wildlife Scouts NRCN Natural Resources Conservation