DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Bank Document E852 v 3 Public Disclosure Authorized Department for International Development Reduction of Nutrient Discharges and Methane Emissions in Rostov-on-Don Environmental Impact Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized Halcrow Group Limited Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Department for International Development Reduction of Nutrient Discharges and Methane Emissions in Rostov-on-Don Environmental Impact Assessment August 2001 Halcrow Group Limited Halcrow Group Limited Burderop Park Swindon Wiltshire SN4 0QD Tel +44 (0)1793 812479 Fax +44 (0)1793 812089 www.Halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their client, DFID, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2001 Halcrow Group Limited Burderop Park Swindon Wiltshire SN4 0QD Tel +44 (0)1793 812479 Fax +44 (0)1793 812089 www.Halcrow.com Department for International Development Reduction of Nutrient Discharges and Methane Emissions in Rostov-on-Don Environmental Impact Assessment August 2001 Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issu Revisio Description Date Signed e n 0 Draft April 2001 1 1 Final with amandments August added from reviewers 2001 Contents Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 8 1.1 Background 8 1.2 Context and Need for Improvements 8 1.2.1 Introduction 8 1.2.2 Regional Projects 9 1.2.3 Specific Scheme Development 11 1.3 Study Area 13 1.4 Scope and Approach 13 1.5 Structure of the Report 14 2 Policy, Legal and Institutional Framework 15 2.1 Introduction 15 2.2 Institutional Framework 15 2.2.1 Protection and Management of Natural Resources 15 2.2.2 Management of Water Resources 16 2.3 Russian Legislation (Federal, Oblast and City) 18 2.3.1 Environmental Impact Assessment 18 2.3.2 Environmental Protection 18 2.3.3 Water Resources Management 19 2.3.4 Waste Management 19 2.4 International Agreements 19 3 Methodology 21 3.1 Introduction 21 3.2 Baseline Data Collection 21 3.3 Evaluation of the Environmental Impacts 22 3.4 Consultation 23 4 Description of the Project 24 4.1 Introduction 24 4.2 Existing Treatment Process 24 4.3 Outline description of proposed process improvements 28 4.3.1 Component 1: Upgrading of screening and grit removal 28 4.3.2 Component 2: Renovation of the primary settlement tanks28 Doc 1, Rev 1, Aug-01 D:\Adobe\Acrobat 4.0\PDF Output\E8520v30rev0Rostov0WWTW0EIA0Final.doc ii 4.3.3 Component 3: Modification and extension of the secondary aeration tanks (6) 28 4.3.4 Component 4: Incorporation of lamella settlers (7) 28 4.3.5 Component 5: Chemical Phosphorus stripping 29 4.3.6 Component 6: Sludge digestion 29 4.3.7 Component 7: Sludge dewatering (31) 29 4.3.8 Component 8: Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Plant – Methane use 29 4.4 Nutrient Reduction 29 4.4.1 Concept 29 4.4.2 Upgrading of screening and grit removal, renovation of primary treatment tanks (Components 1 and 2) 31 4.4.3 Biological nutrient removal (Components 3 and 4) 31 4.4.4 Phosphorus stripping (Component 5) 32 4.5 Sludge Processing and Methane Utilisation 33 4.5.1 Introduction 33 4.5.2 Sludge digestion (Component 6) 39 4.5.3 Sludge Dewatering (Component 7) 39 4.5.4 CHP plant – Methane Use (Component 8) 40 4.6 Sludge Quantities and Quality 41 4.7 Construction Programme 42 5 Existing Environmental Conditions 43 5.1 Introduction 43 5.2 Physical Environment 43 5.2.1 Topography, Geology and Soils 43 5.2.2 Climate 44 5.2.3 Hydrology 44 5.2.4 Hydrogeology 47 5.3 Natural Environment 48 5.3.1 Terrestrial Ecology 48 5.3.2 Aquatic and Wetland Ecology 50 5.4 Human Environment 53 5.4.1 Population, Employment and Income Distribution 53 5.4.2 Water Resources, Supply and Sanitation 54 5.4.3 Public Health 57 5.4.4 Land Use, Industry and Agriculture 64 5.4.5 Fisheries 67 5.4.6 Energy Production and Consumption 69 5.4.7 Transport Infrastructure 71 Doc 1, Rev 1, Aug-01 D:\Adobe\Acrobat 4.0\PDF Output\E8520v30rev0Rostov0WWTW0EIA0Final.doc iii 5.4.8 Solid Waste Disposal 72 5.4.9 Tourism and Recreation 85 5.4.10 Cultural Heritage 86 5.5 Environmental Quality 86 5.5.1 Surface Water Quality 86 5.5.2 Groundwater Quality 107 5.5.3 Sediment Quality 108 5.5.4 Air Quality 120 6 Environmental Impacts of the Scheme 124 6.1 Introduction 124 6.2 Environmental Impact Matrices 124 6.3 Impacts during Construction 131 6.3.1 Introduction 131 6.3.2 Components 1 and 2 132 6.3.3 Component 3 132 6.3.4 Component 4 133 6.3.5 Component 5 Chemical Phosphorus removal 133 6.3.6 Component 6 Sludge digestion 133 6.3.7 Component 8 CHP – Methane use 133 6.4 Impacts during Operation 133 6.4.1 Introduction 133 6.4.2 Components 1 - 4 134 6.4.3 Component 5 Chemical P removal 135 6.4.4 Component 6 Sludge digestion 138 6.4.5 Component 8 CHP 140 7 Overview of Alternative Schemes 142 7.1 Introduction 142 7.2 Options for Reduction of Nutrient Discharges 142 7.3 Options analysis 143 7.3.1 Preferred Option 147 7.3.2 Other proposals 147 8 Environmental Management Plan 149 8.1 Introduction 149 8.2 Mitigation Plan 149 8.3 Monitoring Plan 153 8.3.1 Introduction 153 Doc 1, Rev 1, Aug-01 D:\Adobe\Acrobat 4.0\PDF Output\E8520v30rev0Rostov0WWTW0EIA0Final.doc iv 8.3.2 Monitoring during Construction 157 8.3.3 Monitoring during Operation 157 8.4 Training and Capacity Building Requirements 157 9 Conclusions 159 9.1 Introduction 159 9.2 Key Environmental Effects 159 9.3 Residual Adverse Impacts 160 9.4 Key Mitigation and Monitoring Measures 161 9.5 Recommendations for Future Studies 162 9.5.1 Introduction 162 9.5.2 Development of a Sludge Disposal Strategy 162 9.5.3 Chemical stripping of return liquors from sludge treatment163 9.5.4 Energy consumption audit 163 9.5.5 Audit of WWTW chlorination programme 163 9.5.6 Don Delta and Sea of Azov Biodiversity Studies (non-RVK) 164 Doc 1, Rev 1, Aug-01 D:\Adobe\Acrobat 4.0\PDF Output\E8520v30rev0Rostov0WWTW0EIA0Final.doc v APPENDICES Appendix A: Photographs Appendix B: List of relevant environmental legislation Appendix C: Maximum Allowable Concentrations for Fisheries and Drinking Water Appendix D: Water Quality Data and Figures Appendix E: The Environmental Assessment Team Appendix F: EIA workshop Appendix G: References FIGURES 1.1 The Rostov Oblast, showing the Lower Don River 1.2 The Greater Rostov area, showing the location of the WWTW 2.1 Water Resources Management in Rostov: Organisation chart 4.1 Site Map showing existing and proposed GEF-funded improvements 4.2 Existing Wastewater Treatment Process (in text) 4.3 Site Map showing location of sludge lagoon 4.4 Schematic of proposed modified biological treatment process (in text) 4.5 Proposed process line incorporating sludge treatment and methane use (in text) 4.6 Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions without methane use (in text) 4.7 Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions with methane use (in text) 5.1 Major abstractions and discharges on the Lower Don 5.2 Natural ecosystems of the Rostov Oblast 5.3 Protected areas within the Lower Don area 5.4 Land Use map for Rostov City 5.5 The Lower Don Recreation Area 5.6 Archaeological sites of the Lower Don 5.7 Exceedance of Fisheries Maximum Allowable Concentrations along the Lower Don (in text) 5.8 Exceedance of Drinking Water Maximum Allowable Concentrations along the Lower Don (in text) 5.9 Typical seasonality in the contribution of point and non-point sources to phosphorus concentrations in the river (in text) 5.10 Air pollution in Rostov City Doc 1, Rev 1, Aug-01 D:\Adobe\Acrobat 4.0\PDF Output\E8520v30rev0Rostov0WWTW0EIA0Final.doc vi GLOSSARY BOD Biological Oxygen Demand (an indirect measure of the level of biologically available organic material – used as a measure of pollution) CHP Combined Heat and Power CPPI Centre for the Preparation and Implementation of International Project (North Caucasus branch) CSIP Community Social Infrastructure Project DBWMA Don Basin Water Management Authority DFID Department for International Development (British Government) Ecology Note to translators: Ecology should be translated into Russian as Biology EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EPC Equilibrium Phosphorus Concentration EQO Environmental Quality Objective EQS Environmental Quality Standard GEF Global Environment Fund (World Bank) GRESAP Greater Rostov Environment Strategic Action Plan Lumbricidae Family of Annelid worms, including the earthworm MAC Maximum Allowable Concentration MNR Ministry of Natural Resources MSW Municipal Solid Waste OCP Organochlorine pesticides RVK Rostov Vodokanal SPS Sewerage Pumping Station SRP Soluble Reactive Phosphate VOC Volatile Organic Compound WHO World Health Organisation WPA Water Protection Area WWTW Wastewater Treatment Works Doc 1, Rev 1, Aug-01 D:\Adobe\Acrobat 4.0\PDF Output\E8520v30rev0Rostov0WWTW0EIA0Final.doc vii Executive Summary 1. INTRODUCTION This report documents the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of two Global Environment Fund grants aimed at improving nutrient removal and reducing the amount of methane emitted from the Wastewater Treatment Works (WWTW) in Rostov City. The long- term objective of the improvements is to reduce pollution loads (especially the nutrients causing eutrophication) to the River Don, Sea of Azov and Black Sea, and to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. The work was commissioned by the British Government (Department for International Development, DFID) as part of a collaborative approach to the delivery of technical and financial assistance to the region.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BR IFIC N° 2620 Index/Indice
    BR IFIC N° 2620 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha 27.05.2008 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station la station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-ajouter MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 108029363 AUS 6.4700 WEIPA QLD AUS 141E51'09'' 12S39'34'' FC 1 ADD 2 108029369
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: ICR1520 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (COFN-03810 IBRD-38060) ON A LOAN Public Disclosure Authorized IN THE AMOUNT OF US$ 110 MILLION TO THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR A ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized March 30, 2012 Sustainable Development Department Russian Federation Public Disclosure Authorized Europe and Central Asia CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective 06/30/2011) Currency Unit = Ruble 1.00 Ruble = US$ 0.033 US$ 1.00 = 30.25 Rubles FISCAL YEAR Russian Federation: January 1 – December 31 World Bank: July 1 – June 30 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CPPI Center for Preparation and Implementation of International Projects on Technical Assistance (originally Center for Project Preparation and Implementation) CAS World Bank Country Assistance Strategy EFP Environmental Framework Program EMP Environmental Management Project FLA Final Loan Agreement GC General Consultant GOR Government of Russia IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development ICB International Competitive Bidding ICR Implementation Completion Report IS International Shopping MEPNR Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources MNR Ministry of Natural Resources MNRE Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology MOEDT Ministry of Economic Development and Trade MOF Ministry of Finance NEAP National Environmental Action Plan NPAF National Pollution Abatement Facility QAG Quality Assurance Group PEL Past Environmental Liability REAP Regional Environmental Action Plan RF Russian Federation Roshydromet Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring Service of the Russian Federation SAR Staff Appraisal Report SB Supervisory Board SCEP State Committee for Environmental Protection SEAP Sectoral Environmental Action Plan TA Technical Assistance Vice President: Philippe H. Le Houerou Country Director: Michal J Rutkowski Sector Manager: Benoit Paul Blarel Project Team Leader: Adriana Damianova ICR Team Leader: Adriana Damianova Richard J.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Exter Al Effects of the Fu Ctio I G of the Eco
    Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies Vol. 15-1 (2015) ECOLOGICAL EXTERAL EFFECTS OF THE FUCTIOIG OF THE ECOOMIC COMPLEX OF THE SOUTH OF RUSSIA. MITROVANOVA, I.V. * STAROKOZHEVA, G.I. MITROFANOVA, I.A. SHKARUPA, E.A. BATMANOVA, V.V. Abstract The article explores the issues of heterogeneity of economic development of subjects (regions) of the southern Federal district, analyzes the impact of the economic activity on main indicators of pollution, which largely determine the quality of the natural environment. Authors show an assessment of air quality, recorded discharges of entities by contaminated wastewater, examines trends in waste production and consumption in the subjects of the Southern Federal district, most of which belong to the type of old industrial regions. The authors believe that the sustainable development of the mixed economy of Southern Russia needs measures of systemic nature, aimed at the rational use of resources in the process of managing and preserving the environment that requires correction of the district and regional strategies and programs for socio-economic development. That is now the priority of strategic territorial management, which involves the modernization of the economic complex of the Southern Federal district, taking into account the environmental imperative. It is becoming increasingly evident the necessity of a transformation of Federal districts into territorial centers for economic development, characterized by the economic space of a higher quality. Key words: region, Southern Federal district, economic complex, heterogeneity of economic development, diversity of the economy, structural and technological shifts, environmental externalities, technologically obsolete enterprises, pollution of territories, negative impact, environment. JEL Codes: 1. Introduction Under modern conditions a special acuteness acquires the problem of the strengthening of negative external effects of the economic activity when the majority of * I.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Argus Russian Coal
    Argus Russian Coal Issue 17-36 | Monday 9 October 2017 MARKET COmmENTARY PRICES Turkey lifts coal imports from Russia Russian coal prices $/t Turkey increased receipts of Russian thermal coal by 9pc on Delivery basis NAR kcal/kg Delivery period 6 Oct ± 29 Sep the year in January-August, to 7.79mn t, according to data fob Baltic ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 86.97 -0.20 from statistics agency Tuik, amid higher demand from utili- fob Black Sea ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 90.63 -0.25 ties and households. Russian material replaced supplies from cif Marmara* 6,000 Nov 17 100.33 0.33 South Africa, which redirected part of shipments to more fob Vostochny 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 100.00 1.00 profitable markets in Asia-Pacific this year. fob Vostochny 5,500 Nov-Dec 17 87.0 0 1.75 *assessment of Russian and non-Russian coal In August Russian coal receipts rose to over 1.26mn t, up by 15pc on the year and by around 19pc on the month. Russian coal prices $/t This year demand for sized Russian coal is higher com- Delivery basis NAR kcal/kg Delivery period Low High pared with last year because of colder winter weather in 2016-2017, a Russian supplier says. Demand for coal fines fob Baltic ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 85.25 88.00 fob Black Sea ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 89.50 91.00 from utilities has also risen amid the launch of new coal- fob Vostochny 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 100.00 100.00 fired capacity, the source adds.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety of Technogenic and Natural Systems 2020
    №3 Safety of Technogenic and Natural Systems 2020 UDC 614.849 https://doi.org/10.23947/2541-9129-2020-3-21-32 Territorial fire statistics and assessment of their causes and consequences on the example of the Rostov region V. G. Ustin1, Yu. I. Bulygin2, P. P. Tretyakov3, V. V. Maslenskiy4 1 MD of the MES of Russia for the Rostov region (Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation) 2,3,4 Don State Technical University (Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation) Introduction. A deep and comprehensive analysis of the parameters of the situation with fires in the territories of the Russian Federation and its relationship with socio-economic processes is more relevant than ever for Russia. The article presents, summarizes and analyzes statistical data on the situation with fires and their consequences on the territory of the Rostov region for 2018-2019. Problem Statement. The paper considers the problem of official statistical accounting of fires, the procedure for accounting for people killed and injured in a fire in the context of a changing regulatory framework in this area. The analysis of the situation, official and verified information on fires and their consequences will create a reliable socio- economic characteristic of the Rostov region. Theoretical Part. The paper deals with the peculiarities of accounting of fires and their consequences in Russia. The source materials are the official statistics of the MD of the MES of Russia for the Rostov region on the number of fires on the territory, months, the number of people injured and killed in fires and their distribution by gender, age and time of death, objects and causes of fires.
    [Show full text]
  • MEGA Rostov-On-Don Rostov-On-Don, Russia a Way of 15 MLN Life for All VISITORS ANNUALLY
    MEGA Rostov-on-Don Rostov-on-Don, Russia A way of 15 MLN life for all VISITORS ANNUALLY Conveniently located near the M4 federal highway, with Enjoying over 15 million visitors a year, MEGA Rostov-on-Don a competitive mix of anchor tenants, affordable family has the highest footfall in the region. Our concept allows every value, and an exceptional food and beverage offer, guest to find something which appeals to the whole family, be MEGA Rostov-on-Don has the highest brand awareness that leisure or shopping. Our wide range of stores, services and among our competitors. leisure opportunities significantly increases dwell time, providing Luhansk high sales and a fun day out for our guests. Kamensk-Shakhtinskiy Gukovo Donetsk Novoshakhtinsk ShakhtyShakaty Novocherkassk Volgodonsk ROSTOV-ON-DON City Centre Taganrog Bataysk Azov Catchment Areas People Distance ● Primary 40,720 11 km ● Secondary 1,450,920 11–18 km ● Tertiary 2,831,070 > 18–211 km 59% EyskTotal area: 4,322,710 9 33% CUSTOMERS COME BUS ROUTES LIFESTYLE BY CAR GUESTS Sal’sk Tikhoretsk A region with Loyal customers MEGA Rostov is located in the city of Rostov–on-Don and attracts shoppers from all over the strong potential city and surrounding area. MEGA is loved by families, lifestyle and experienced guests alike. Rostov region The city of Rostov-on-Don Rostov region is a part of the Southern Federal District. Considered as a southern capital of Russia, Rostov- GUESTS VISIT MEGA 125 MINS 756km away from Moscow it has major railway routes on-Don has a diverse economical profile, with major AVERAGE 34% 62% 2.7 TIMES PER MONTH DWELL TIME passing in many directions across Russia and abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Conditions for Formation of an Ecological and Recreational Cluster in the Rostov Region and Its Development Potential
    E3S Web of Conferences 273, 09018 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127309018 INTERAGROMASH 2021 Socio-economic conditions for formation of an ecological and recreational cluster in the Rostov region and its development potential Lyudmila Kazmina1*, Vadim Makarenko1, Valeria Provotorina1, and Elena Shevchenko1 1 Don State Technical University, Gagarina Sq., 1, Rostov-on-Don, 344000, Russia Abstract. The article is concerned with basic concepts related to development of an ecological-excursion cluster in the Rostov region. The socio-economic conditions of its formation are described. The research base on which the research related to the study of touristic clusters is found is reviewed. It also gives grounds for the possibility of functioning of the ecological and recreational cluster, defines its functions and importance for the development of inbound and domestic tourism, the economy and the social sphere of the region. The zoning of the territory of the Rostov region according to the prevailing types of ecological and recreational clusters is proposed and the specifics of their activities and the development of types of tourism are indicated. 1 Introduction An effective tool for development of socio-economic systems in the sphere of tourism is implementation of a cluster approach that provides harmonization of private and public interests, diversification of risks and improvement of regional potential use. The clustering process is coherent giving a number of management decisions related to the specifics of the industry, participants, location, capacity, and a number of other indicators. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an algorithm to cluster the regional territory and manage development of economic zones on the basis of a systematic approach and with consideration of all factors, which have an effect on this process.
    [Show full text]
  • As of June 30, 2018
    LIST OF AFFILIATES Sberbank of Russia (full corporate name of the joint-stock company) Issuer code: 0 1 4 8 1 – В as 3 0 0 6 2 0 1 8 of (indicate the date on which the list of affiliates of the joint-stock company was compiled) Address of the issuer: 19, Vavilova St., Moscow 117997 (address of the issuer – the joint-stock company – indicated in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities where a body or a representative of the joint-stock company is located) Information contained in this list of affiliates is subject to disclosure pursuant to the laws of the Russian Federation on securities. Website: http://www.sberbank.com; http://www.e-disclosure.ru/portal/company.aspx?id=3043 (the website used by the issuer to disclose information) Deputy Chairperson of the Executive Board of Sberbank B. Zlatkis (position of the authorized individual of the joint-stock company) (signature) (initials, surname) L.S. “ 03 ” July 20 18 . Issuer codes INN (Taxpayer Identificat ion Number) 7707083893 OGRN (Primary State Registrati on Number) 1027700132195 I. Affiliates as of 3 0 0 6 2 0 1 8 Item Full company name (or name for a Address of a legal entity or place of Grounds for recognizing the entity Date on which Interest of the affiliate Percentage of ordinary No. nonprofit entity) or full name (if any) of residence of an individual (to be as an affiliate the grounds in the charter capital of shares of the joint- the affiliate indicated only with the consent of became valid the joint-stock stock company owned the individual) company, % by the affiliate, % 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Entity may manage more than The Central Bank of the Russian 12, Neglinnaya St., Moscow 20% of the total number of votes 1 21.03.1991 50.000000004 52.316214 Federation 107016 attached to voting shares of the Bank 1.
    [Show full text]
  • System Development Map 2019 / 2020 Presents Existing Infrastructure & Capacity from the Perspective of the Year 2020
    7125/1-1 7124/3-1 SNØHVIT ASKELADD ALBATROSS 7122/6-1 7125/4-1 ALBATROSS S ASKELADD W GOLIAT 7128/4-1 Novaya Import & Transmission Capacity Zemlya 17 December 2020 (GWh/d) ALKE JAN MAYEN (Values submitted by TSO from Transparency Platform-the lowest value between the values submitted by cross border TSOs) Key DEg market area GASPOOL Den market area Net Connect Germany Barents Sea Import Capacities Cross-Border Capacities Hammerfest AZ DZ LNG LY NO RU TR AT BE BG CH CZ DEg DEn DK EE ES FI FR GR HR HU IE IT LT LU LV MD MK NL PL PT RO RS RU SE SI SK SM TR UA UK AT 0 AT 350 194 1.570 2.114 AT KILDIN N BE 477 488 965 BE 131 189 270 1.437 652 2.679 BE BG 577 577 BG 65 806 21 892 BG CH 0 CH 349 258 444 1.051 CH Pechora Sea CZ 0 CZ 2.306 400 2.706 CZ MURMAN DEg 511 2.973 3.484 DEg 129 335 34 330 932 1.760 DEg DEn 729 729 DEn 390 268 164 896 593 4 1.116 3.431 DEn MURMANSK DK 0 DK 101 23 124 DK GULYAYEV N PESCHANO-OZER EE 27 27 EE 10 168 10 EE PIRAZLOM Kolguyev POMOR ES 732 1.911 2.642 ES 165 80 245 ES Island Murmansk FI 220 220 FI 40 - FI FR 809 590 1.399 FR 850 100 609 224 1.783 FR GR 350 205 49 604 GR 118 118 GR BELUZEY HR 77 77 HR 77 54 131 HR Pomoriy SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT MAP HU 517 517 HU 153 49 50 129 517 381 HU Strait IE 0 IE 385 385 IE Kanin Peninsula IT 1.138 601 420 2.159 IT 1.150 640 291 22 2.103 IT TO TO LT 122 325 447 LT 65 65 LT 2019 / 2020 LU 0 LU 49 24 73 LU Kola Peninsula LV 63 63 LV 68 68 LV MD 0 MD 16 16 MD AASTA HANSTEEN Kandalaksha Avenue de Cortenbergh 100 Avenue de Cortenbergh 100 MK 0 MK 20 20 MK 1000 Brussels - BELGIUM 1000 Brussels - BELGIUM NL 418 963 1.381 NL 393 348 245 168 1.154 NL T +32 2 894 51 00 T +32 2 209 05 00 PL 158 1.336 1.494 PL 28 234 262 PL Twitter @ENTSOG Twitter @GIEBrussels PT 200 200 PT 144 144 PT [email protected] [email protected] RO 1.114 RO 148 77 RO www.entsog.eu www.gie.eu 1.114 225 RS 0 RS 174 142 316 RS The System Development Map 2019 / 2020 presents existing infrastructure & capacity from the perspective of the year 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Place-Names of 'Hidden' Or 'Indirect' Scottish Origin
    Russian place-names of ‘hidden’ or ‘indirect’ Scottish origin (the case of Hamilton – Khomutov) Alexander Pavlenko and Galina Pavlenko In Russia there are numerous toponyms going back to personal or place names of western European origins. This phenomenon resulted from several waves of massive immigration from the West, first to Muscovite Rus’ and later, in greater numbers, to the Russian Empire. Among the immigrants, most of whom originated from Germany, there was quite a number of Scotsmen – active participants in all the major historical events in both Western and Eastern Europe. The first Scotsmen in Russia, called Shkotskie Nemtsy (literally ‘Scottish Germans’) by locals, belonged to the military class and came to this country either as mercenaries or prisoners of war in the late sixteenth century in the reign of Ivan the Terrible. Most of them were captured during the Livonian War and continued their military service in the Russian troops (Anderson 1990: 37). In the seventeenth century with the accession of the Romanovs dynasty to the throne, Scotsmen started to arrive in Russia in ever increasing numbers. Some of those who abandoned their motherland, driven by circumstances managed to inscribe their names in Russian history as prominent soldiers, engineers, doctors, architects, etc. Scottish mercenaries and adventurers considered the remote Russian lands to be a place where they could build their career and hopefully make a fortune. Of course, as is well known, Russia was only one of a multitude of destinations which Scotsmen sought to reach. The late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries saw a more abundant influx of Scots due to the Petrine reforms and a high demand for foreign professionals in all fields (Dukes 1987: 9–23; Cross 1987: 24–46).
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Regions: Goals, Challenges, Achievements'
    Russia National Human Development Report Russian Federation 2006/2007 Russia’s Regions: Goals, Challenges, Achievements Russia National Human Development Report Russian Federation 2006/2007 Russia’s Regions: Goals, Challenges, Achievements The National Human Development Report 2006/2007 for the Russian Federation has been prepared by a team of Russian experts and consultants. The analysis and policy recommendations in this Report do not necessarily reflect the views of the UN system and the institutions by which the experts and consultants are employed. Chief authors: Sub-faculty of Geography Department at Irkutsk State Prof. Sergei N. Bobylev, Dr.Sc. (Economics), Department of University (Box. Irkutsk Region) Economics at Lomonosov Moscow State University Albina A. Shirobokova, Ph.D. (Economics), Associate Professor Anastassia L. Alexandrova, Ph.D. (Economics), Executive of Sociology and Social work Department at Irkutsk Director at the Institute for Urban Economics State Technical University; President of Baikal Regional Prof. Natalia V. Zubarevich, Dr.Sc. (Geography), Department Women’s Association ‘Angara’ (Box. Irkutsk Region) of Geography at Lomonosov Moscow State University; Prof. Lidiya M. Shodoyeva, Ph.D. (Economics), Department Head of Regional Programs at the Independent Institute of Management at Gorno-Altai State University (Box. Altai for Social Policy Republic) Taiciya B Bardakhanova, Ph.D. (Economics), Chief of Authors: Economics of Environmental Management and Tourism Prof. Natalia V. Zubarevich (Chapters 1–3, 5–7. Survey of Department at the Ministry of Economic Development Federal Districts. Chapter 9) and External Relations of the Republic of Buryatia (Box. Ivan Y. Shulga, Ph.D. (Economics), Consultant at the Republic of Buryatia) Department of Social Programmes of the World Bank Elena A.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Territorial Planning and Prospects for Further Development of Urban Districts and Settlements in Rostov Region
    MATEC Web of Conferences 106, 01004 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/ matecconf/201710601004 SPbWOSCE-2016 Analysis of Territorial Planning and Prospects for Further Development of Urban Districts and Settlements in Rostov Region Natalia Ovchinnikova1,* 1Don State Technical University, pl. Gagarina, 1, Rostov-on-Don, 344010, Russia Abstract: This article covers the problems of modern urban districts and settlements of the Rostov region with due regard to the organization of their territories. Prospects for the further development of the urban districts and settlements are defined based on the goals of the urban-planning activity. Short-term and mid-term trends of residential construction in the Rostov region are classified in terms of the improvement of town-planning documentation. It is concluded that the territorial planning organization is an integral part of sustainable territorial and urban development of any region. 1 Introduction As a rule, a populated settlement is a point where economic, political and social activities are concentrated. Problems of modern cities can be considered as a specific demographic populated system integrated into the natural environment. Over the last years an economic component in the management of urban districts and settlements development has been playing center stage covering not only environmental issues but also an optimal ratio of the elements of artificial and natural environment required for creation of favorable living conditions for the population. Besides, it is necessary to determine whether it is expedient to supply production with natural resources to the maximum extent. The pending problem is to determine the priority of the resources consumption, evaluate each territory in order to determine what kind of business activities would be the most suitable for it, and choose the one that would meet the characteristics of such area to the most extent.
    [Show full text]