Sagina Procumbens L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sagina Procumbens L A foundational biodiversity map of the terrestrial microbiome of a sub-Antarctic island. Siddarthan Venkatachalam1, Robert Pienaar1, Gwynneth Matcher1, Nasipi Mtsi1, Peter le Roux2, Michelle Greve2, Bettine Jansen van Vuuren3, Sudharshan Sekar3, Rosemary Dorrington1 1Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 2Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria 3Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg Sub-Antarctic Island: Prince Edward Islands Marion Island (290 km2) and Prince Edward (45 km2)1 PEIs are of volcanic origin Important breeding site for seabirds and mammals2 Gradual increase 0.04°C per year Decrease in annual precipitation Fragile ecosystem (courtesy of I. Meiklejohn). Marion Island (46° 54´ S, 37° 45´ E) Prince Edward Island (46° 38´ S, 37° Marion Island Vegetation The vascular flora (N.J.M. Gremmen, pers. comm.) 22 native species, 18 introduced species 3 unknown species Indigenous plant Azorella selago Hook. f. Invasive plant Sagina procumbens L. Courtesy of Robert Pienaar Over all objective To map the genetic diversity of microbial communities and plant species present in the Marion Island under different habitat complexes. Research Questions 1. Does different habitat complexes in the Marion island contains different microbial communities? 2. What microbial groups are associated with the root tissues of plants (rhizosphere), surrounding soils and how do plants benefit from their microbiome? 3. Do different soils and plants types host different microbial communities? 4. Is there any significant differences among rhizosphere microbial communities of indigenous Azorella selago and invasive Sagina procumbens plant species? If so how they are influencing the sub-Antarctic ecosystems. Sample collection under different habitats Rachomytrium Habitat Soil Azorella Blechnum Sagina Crassula Cotula Agrostis Acaena (moss) Fellfield 8 7 2 1 Nil Nil Nil Nil 1 Polar 3 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil desert Salt spray 2 6 Nil 9 8 6 Nil Nil Nil Mire-Slope 8 2 6 8 Nil Nil 1 1 Nil Samples were collected during 2016 Marion takeover voyage, (April/May) Molecular Taxonomy Bacteria : 16S rRNA gene Eukaryotes : 18S rRNA gene E517F (5’-CAGCAGCCGCGGTAA-3’) E969-984 (5’-GTAAGGTTCYTCGCGT-3’) Highly conserved regions Plant Barcoding genes – Identical in all bacteria – Single PCR primer pair can amplify 16S rRNA Ribulose biphosphate genes from diverse carboxylase large (rbcL) bacteria Highly variable regions Maturase K (matK) – Conserved within species – Divergent between species Plant Barcoding Vascular indigenous plant species barcoded in Marion Island Acaena magellanica, Agrostis castellana, Agrostis magellanica, Blechnum penna-marina, Callitriche, Cotula plumose, Crassula moschata, Elaphaglossum, Grammitis kerguelensis, Hymenophyllum peltatum, Juncus, Limosella, https://wikivisually.com/lang-es/wiki/Acaena_magellanica Lycopodium magellanicum, Lycopodium saururus, Montia fontaum, Poa cookii, Polystichum, Pringlea antiscorbutica, Ranunculus biternatus, Uncinia compacta. Microbial community diversity between different habitats Phylogenetic classification Phylogenetic classification of bacterial reads represented by heat map. The bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences were amplified from gDNA and classification was carried out using the Silva reference database (Version 128) and the Mothur software (Version 1.39) platform. Phylogenetic classification Phylogenetic classification of bacterial reads represented by heat map. The bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences were amplified from gDNA and classification was carried out using the Silva reference database (Version 128) and the Mothur software (Version 1.39) platform. Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling Plot Non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) ordination plots. The 16S rRNA amplicon libraries generated from gDNA. The 2D-NMDS was standardized by square-root transformation and a Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix. The 16S rRNA bacterial OTUs generated (cut-off 97%) Microbial community diversity between indigenous and invasive plant Azorella selago Hook. f. One of the primary colonizers3 Most abundant and widely distributed4 High impact on Marion Island ecosystems Ecosystem engineers involves in soil formations Provides microclimates for microbes and small insects Sagina Procumbens L. Greve et al. 2017 First found on Marion Island in 19655 Increasing distribution on Marion6 Can colonize new environments (e.g. Surtsey)7 Diagram of sampling Indigenous and Invasive plant 12 Exposed Soil Soil Underneath 9 Cushion 3 Soil Control 6 Phylogenetic classification 100% Acidobacteria Actinobacteria 90% Bacteroidetes Chlamydiae 80% Chloroflexi 70% Cyanobacteria Dependentiae 60% Fibrobacteres Firmicutes 50% Gemmatimonadetes Latescibacteria 40% Minor Phyla 30% Nitrospirae Patescibacteria Abundance Relative to Sample Total (%) Total Sample to Relative Abundance 20% Planctomycetes Proteobacteria 10% Rokubacteria Spirochaetes 0% M1 M3 Unclassified Bacteria M10 M12 M19 M21 M27 M29 M35 M37 M43 M45 M52 M54 M60 M62 RR082 RR085 RR092 RR100 RR102 RR109 RR111 RR119 RR121 RR128 RR130 RR137 RR139 RR146 RR148 RR084r1 RR093r2 Verrucomicrobia ROS 1 ROS 2 ROS 3 ROS 4 ROS 5 ROS 6 ROS 7 ROS 8 SAG 1 SAG 2 SAG3 SAG 4 SAG 5 SAG 6 SAG 7 SAG 8 Soil Sample Underneath Plant Body Principal Coordinates Analysis Fast UniFrac based PCoA ordination plots. The 16S rRNA amplicon libraries generated from gDNA and The 16S rRNA bacterial OTUs generated at the cut-off 97%. The samples were standardized by square-root transformation and a Bray– Curtis dissimilarity matrix. Summary Diversity and distribution of bacterial communities across different habitat complexes in Marion Island were studied. Saltspray habitats contains distinct bacterial diversity pattern Bacterial assemblages between indigenous Azorella selago and invasive Sagina procumbens found to be significantly different. Future Work Priority habitat sites- Functional Genomics: Metabolic profiles of bacterial genomes Other flagship programs Marine spatial planning: Algoa Bay R.A. Dorrington and A.T. Lombard Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition Sarah Fawcett and R.A. Dorrington Other flagship programs Stromatolites biodiversity survey: Gordon and Betty Moore foundation - R.A. Dorrington and Kerry L Mcphail Freshwater Lake : Algal Blooms - Guy Bate and R.A. Dorrington References 1 Venkatachalam S. et al., 2017. PloS One. 12 (8), e0183400 2Venkatachalam S. et al., 2018. Limnology and Oceanography online first 3McGeoch, M. A. et al., 2008. Stellenbosch, RSA: Sun Press, pp. 215–276. 4Phiri, E.E., McGeoch, M.A. & Chown, S.L. 2015. Polar Biology. 38(11):1881– 1890 5Gremmen, N. 1975. South African Journal of Antarctic Research. 5:25–30. 6Ramaswiela, T. 2010. MSc thesis. Stellenbosch University. 7Magnússon, B. et al. 2009. Surtsey Research. 12(5):57–76. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS NRF SARchi Marine Natural Products Lab, 417 Any Queries /Collaboration /Assistance in genomics platform Dr. Venkat Siddarthan, Post-Doctoral Researcher, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown Email: [email protected] Bacterial Communities – Azorella selago Azorella 1 - Large Azorella 3 - Large Azorella 5 - Large Azorella 7 - Large Bacterial Communities – Azorella selago Azorella 2 - Small Azorella 4 - Small Azorella 6 - Small Azorella 8 - Small Bacterial Communities – Sagina procumbens Sagina 1 - Large Sagina 3 - Large Sagina 5 - Large Sagina 7 - Large Bacterial Communities – Sagina procumbens Sagina 2 - Medium Sagina 8 - Medium Sagina 4 - Small Sagina 6 - Small .
Recommended publications
  • Toward a Resolution of Campanulid Phylogeny, with Special Reference to the Placement of Dipsacales
    TAXON 57 (1) • February 2008: 53–65 Winkworth & al. • Campanulid phylogeny MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS Toward a resolution of Campanulid phylogeny, with special reference to the placement of Dipsacales Richard C. Winkworth1,2, Johannes Lundberg3 & Michael J. Donoghue4 1 Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 11461–CEP 05422-970, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. [email protected] (author for correspondence) 2 Current address: School of Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Sciences, University of the South Pacific, Private Bag, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji 3 Department of Phanerogamic Botany, The Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 104 05 Stockholm, Sweden 4 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8106, U.S.A. Broad-scale phylogenetic analyses of the angiosperms and of the Asteridae have failed to confidently resolve relationships among the major lineages of the campanulid Asteridae (i.e., the euasterid II of APG II, 2003). To address this problem we assembled presently available sequences for a core set of 50 taxa, representing the diver- sity of the four largest lineages (Apiales, Aquifoliales, Asterales, Dipsacales) as well as the smaller “unplaced” groups (e.g., Bruniaceae, Paracryphiaceae, Columelliaceae). We constructed four data matrices for phylogenetic analysis: a chloroplast coding matrix (atpB, matK, ndhF, rbcL), a chloroplast non-coding matrix (rps16 intron, trnT-F region, trnV-atpE IGS), a combined chloroplast dataset (all seven chloroplast regions), and a combined genome matrix (seven chloroplast regions plus 18S and 26S rDNA). Bayesian analyses of these datasets using mixed substitution models produced often well-resolved and supported trees.
    [Show full text]
  • TERRESTRIAL VEGETATION and ENVIRONMENTS on HEARD ISLAND by D.M
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 133(2), 2000 33 TERRESTRIAL VEGETATION AND ENVIRONMENTS ON HEARD ISLAND by D.M. Bergstrom and P.M. Selkirk (with three tables, one text-figure, one plate and an appendix) BERGSTROM, D.M. & SELKIRK, P.M., 2000 (30:vi): Terrestrial vegetation and environments on Heard Island. In Banks, M.R. & Brown, M.J. (Eds): HEARD ISLAND PAPERS. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 133(2): 33-46. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.133.2.33 ISSN 0080-4703. Department ofBotany, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 4072 (DMB); and Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2019 (PMS). Significantly ice-covered and with a very small flora (11 vascular species and about 60 bryophyte taxa), Heard Island is still emerging from the effects of the last glacial maximum. This study presents the results of a general vegetation survey. A baseline framework of environmental conditions that affect vegetation on the island is described and a classification (TWINS PAN) analysis based on presence/ absence data of both vascular plant species and bryophyte taxa is provided. Distinct suites of taxa were identified on the island, some containing bryophytes only. Fifreen ecological groups were delineated. A discussion of ecological amplitude ofimportant bryophyte and vascular plant taxa on Heard Island is included. Key Words: Subantarctic, tundra, vegetation, bryophytes, cushion plants, Heard Island. INTRODUCTION during the Tertiary and included a variety of ferns and a podocarp (Quilty et al. 1983). Subantarctic Heard Island (53°06'S, 73°32'E) is approxi­ There have been few studies of terrestrial plant ecology mately 4850 km southeast of southern Africa, 4350 km on Heard Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Invasions on Sub-Antarctic Marion and Prince Edward Islands
    Bothalia - African Biodiversity & Conservation ISSN: (Online) 2311-9284, (Print) 0006-8241 Page 1 of 21 Original Research Terrestrial invasions on sub-Antarctic Marion and Prince Edward Islands Authors: Background: The sub-Antarctic Prince Edward Islands (PEIs), South Africa’s southernmost 1 Michelle Greve territories have high conservation value. Despite their isolation, several alien species have Rabia Mathakutha1 Christien Steyn1 established and become invasive on the PEIs. Steven L. Chown2 Objectives: Here we review the invasion ecology of the PEIs. Affiliations: Methods: We summarise what is known about the introduction of alien species, what 1Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of influences their ability to establish and spread, and review their impacts. Pretoria, South Africa Results: Approximately 48 alien species are currently established on the PEIs, of which 26 are 2School of Biological Sciences, known to be invasive. Introduction pathways for the PEIs are fairly well understood – species Monash University, Australia have mainly been introduced with ship cargo and building material. Less is known about establishment, spread and impact of aliens. It has been estimated that less than 5% of the PEIs Corresponding author: is covered by invasive plants, but invasive plants have attained circuminsular distributions on Michelle Greve, [email protected] both PEIs. Studies on impact have primarily focussed on the effects of vertebrate invaders, of which the house mouse, which is restricted to Marion Island, probably has the greatest impact Dates: on the biodiversity of the islands. Because of the risk of alien introductions, strict biosecurity Received: 01 Aug. 2016 regulations govern activities at the PEIs. These are particularly aimed at stemming the Accepted: 05 Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 4 Appendices
    Part 4 Appendices HEARD ISLAND AND MCDONALD ISLANDS MARINE RESERVE 139 Appendix 1. Proclamation of Heard Island and McDonald Islands Marine Reserve 140 MANAGEMENT PLAN HEARD ISLAND AND MCDONALD ISLANDS MARINE RESERVE 141 142 MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix 2. Native Fauna of the HIMI Marine Reserve Listed Under the EPBC Act Scientific Name Common Name Birds recorded as breeding Aptenodytes patagonicus king penguin S Catharacta lonnbergi subantarctic skua S Daption capense cape petrel S Diomeda exulans wandering albatross V S M B J A Diomeda melanophrys black–browed albatross S M B A Eudyptes chrysocome southern rockhopper penguin S Eudyptes chrysolophus macaroni penguin S Larus dominicanus kelp gull S Macronectes giganteus southern giant petrel E S M B A Oceanites oceanicus Wilson’s storm petrel S M J Pachyptila crassirostris fulmar prion S Pachyptila desolata Antarctic prion S Pelecanoides georgicus South Georgian diving petrel S Pelecanoides urinatrix common diving petrel S Phalacrocorax atriceps (e) Heard Island cormorant V S Phoebetria palpebrata light mantled sooty albatross S M B A Pygoscelis papua gentoo penguin S Sterna vittata Antarctic tern V S Non–breeding birds Catharacta maccormicki south polar skua S M J Diomedea epomophora southern royal albatross V S M B A Fregetta grallaria white–bellied storm petrel S Fregetta tropica black–bellied storm petrel S Fulmarus glacialoides southern fulmar S Garrodia nereis grey–backed storm petrel S Halobaena caerulea blue petrel V S Macronectes halli northern giant petrel V S M B A Pachyptila belcheri
    [Show full text]
  • Weed ID Guide
    GUIDE Cross Sector Weed ID guide 1 Contents Introduction How best to use this pocket guide 2 Weeds as alternative hosts to pests and diseases 3 Importance of weed species in each sector 3 Non-chemical weed control 3 Key features of weeds Key features of weeds to aid identification 4 Broad-leaved weed seedlings 4 Grass weed seedlings 6 Identification groups key Identification groups 1–26 8 Importance of each weed Table 1. Relative importance of each weed in each horticultural sector i Non-chemical weed control Table 2. Ease of non-chemical weed control iv Additional Information Acknowledgements viii 0.A 2 Introduction A pocket guide to aid the identification of the most widespread and economically important weeds encountered in the horticultural sector, this publication covers mostly broad-leaved weeds but also some grasses, moss and liverwort. How best to use this pocket guide This guide is primarily an aid to weed seedling identification to help growers choose the right cultural or herbicidal control method. To correctly identify a weed seedling, first read the section, ‘Key features of weeds’, as this will provide a structured plan of how to approach the identification process. Familiarisation with the various parts of the seedling and checking the key features is essential for correct identification. The weeds are grouped (1–26), by common features of the seedlings, so that this facilitates quicker identification. Each weed has been photographed at three stages of its development: cotyledon, first/second true leaf and mature plant, to allow it to be identified at all stages of growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Size Class Structure, Growth Rates, and Orientation of the Central Andean Cushion Azorella Compacta
    Size class structure, growth rates, and orientation of the central Andean cushion Azorella compacta Catherine Kleier1, Tim Trenary2, Eric A. Graham3, William Stenzel4 and Philip W. Rundel5 1 Department of Biology, Regis University, Denver, CO, USA 2 Department of Mathematics, Regis University, Denver, CO, USA 3 Nexleaf Analytics, Los Angeles, CA, USA 4 Department of Computer Information Systems, Metropolitan State University, Denver, CO, USA 5 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA ABSTRACT Azorella compacta (llareta; Apiaceae) forms dense, woody, cushions and characterizes the high elevation rocky slopes of the central Andean Altiplano. Field studies of an elevational gradient of A. compacta within Lauca National Park in northern Chile found a reverse J-shape distribution of size classes of individuals with abundant small plants at all elevations. A new elevational limit for A. compacta was established at 5,250 m. A series of cushions marked 14 years earlier showed either slight shrinkage or small degrees of growth up to 2.2 cm yr−1. Despite their irregularity in growth, cushions of A. compacta show a strong orientation, centered on a north-facing aspect and angle of about 20◦ from horizontal. This exposure to maximize solar irradiance closely matches previous observations of a population favoring north-facing slopes at a similar angle. Populations of A. compacta appear to be stable, or even expanding, with young plants abundant. Subjects Ecology Keywords Andes, Parque Nacional Lauca, Growth rate, Cushion plant, Puna Submitted 19 November 2014 Accepted 27 February 2015 Published 17 March 2015 INTRODUCTION Azorella compacta (Apiaceae), a large woody cushion plant, forms an iconic species of the Corresponding author Catherine Kleier, [email protected] Altiplano Plateau of northern Chile, Bolivia, Argentina, and Peru (Kleier& Rundel, 2004 ).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Nomenclature of the Campanulidae Based on an Expanded Sample of Genes and Taxa
    Systematic Botany (2010), 35(2): pp. 425–441 © Copyright 2010 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Nomenclature of the Campanulidae based on an Expanded Sample of Genes and Taxa David C. Tank 1,2,3 and Michael J. Donoghue 1 1 Peabody Museum of Natural History & Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, P. O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 06520 U. S. A. 2 Department of Forest Resources & Stillinger Herbarium, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, P. O. Box 441133, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1133 U. S. A. 3 Author for correspondence ( [email protected] ) Communicating Editor: Javier Francisco-Ortega Abstract— Previous attempts to resolve relationships among the primary lineages of Campanulidae (e.g. Apiales, Asterales, Dipsacales) have mostly been unconvincing, and the placement of a number of smaller groups (e.g. Bruniaceae, Columelliaceae, Escalloniaceae) remains uncertain. Here we build on a recent analysis of an incomplete data set that was assembled from the literature for a set of 50 campanulid taxa. To this data set we first added newly generated DNA sequence data for the same set of genes and taxa. Second, we sequenced three additional cpDNA coding regions (ca. 8,000 bp) for the same set of 50 campanulid taxa. Finally, we assembled the most comprehensive sample of cam- panulid diversity to date, including ca. 17,000 bp of cpDNA for 122 campanulid taxa and five outgroups. Simply filling in missing data in the 50-taxon data set (rendering it 94% complete) resulted in a topology that was similar to earlier studies, but with little additional resolution or confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth, Fire and Water: Applying Novel Techniques to Eradicate the Invasive
    Island invasives: eradication and management Cooper J.; R.J. Cuthbert, N.J.M. Gremmen, P.G. Ryan, and J.D. Shaw. Earth, fire and water: applying novel techniques to eradicate the invasive plant, procumbent pearlwort Sagina procumbens, on Gough Island, a World Heritage Site in the South Atlantic Earth, fire and water: applying novel techniques to eradicate the invasive plant, procumbent pearlwort Sagina procumbens, on Gough Island, a World Heritage Site in the South Atlantic J. Cooper1,2,3, R. J. Cuthbert4, N. J. M. Gremmen5, P. G. Ryan6 and J. D. Shaw2 1Animal Demography Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa. <[email protected]>. 2DST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa. 3CORE Initiatives, 9 Weltevreden Avenue, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa. 4Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire SG19 2DL, United Kingdom. 5Data-Analyse Ecologie, Hesselsstraat 11, 7981 CD Diever, The Netherlands. 6Percy FitzPatrick Institute DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa. Abstract The Eurasian plant procumbent pearlwort (Sagina procumbens) was first reported in 1998 on Gough Island, a cool-temperate island and World Heritage Site in the central South Atlantic. The first population was discovered adjacent to a meteorological station, which is its assumed point of arrival. Despite numerous eradication attempts, the species has spread along a few hundred metres of coastal cliff, but has not as yet been found in the island’s sub-Antarctic-like mountainous interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Revue D'ecologie
    Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie), Suppt 12 « Espèces invasives », 2015 : 28-32 CHARACTERIZATION OF THE HABITATS COLONIZED BY THE ALIEN GROUND BEETLE MERIZODUS SOLEDADINUS AT THE KERGUELEN ISLANDS 1* 2 3 1 1 D. RENAULT , M. CHEVRIER , M. LAPARIE , P. VERNON & M. LEBOUVIER 1 Université de Rennes 1, UMR CNRS 6553 Ecobio, 263 avenue du Gal Leclerc. F-35042 Rennes, France. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Station Biologique de Paimpont, Université de Rennes 1, UMR CNRS 6553 Ecobio. F-35380 Paimpont, France. E- mail: [email protected]; 3 UR0633, Unité de Recherche Zoologie Forestière, INRA, 2163 Avenue de la Pomme de Pin, CS 40001 Ardon, 45075 Orléans, France. E-mail: [email protected] * Corresponding author. Tél: + 33 2 23 23 66 27; Fax: + 33 2 23 23 50 26 RÉSUMÉ.— Caractérisation des habitats colonisés par le coléoptère terrestre allochtone Merizodus soledadinus aux îles Kerguelen.— Dans le présent travail, nous avons conduit une étude de terrain visant à identifier les habitats colonisés par Merizodus soledadinus, un coléoptère terrestre allochtone afin de comprendre sa dynamique spatiale aux îles Kerguelen. Nous avons pratiqué un piégeage régulier dans plusieurs habitats côtiers sur l’île Haute, combiné à des recherches actives et opportunistes de cette espèce dans d’autres sites de cet archipel subantarctique. Au total 1081 sites ont été visités, et nos données ont révélé que les adultes de M. soledadinus se rencontrent très souvent sur la partie supérieure des estrans (372/540 obs., i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Heard and Mcdonald Islands Australia
    HEARD AND MCDONALD ISLANDS AUSTRALIA Heard Island and the McDonald Islands are in the Southern Ocean, approximately 4,100 km south- west of Perth and 1,700 km from the Antarctic continent. Their distinctive conservation value is as one of the world’s rare pristine island ecosystems which have virtually no record of alien species and minimal human impact; also as the only volcanically active subantarctic islands they provide a window into ongoing tectonic activity, geomorphic processes and glacial dynamics. COUNTRY Australia NAME Heard and McDonald Islands NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SERIAL SITE 1997: Inscribed on the World Heritage List under Natural Criteria viii and ix. STATEMENT OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE [pending] The UNESCO World Heritage Committee issued the following statement at the time of inscription: Justification for Inscription The Committee inscribed this property under criteria (viii) and (ix). It noted that this site is the only volcanically active sub-Antarctic island and illustrates ongoing geomorphic processes and glacial dynamics in the coastal and submarine environment and sub-Antarctic flora and fauna, with no record of alien species. The Committee repeated its request by the sixteenth session for further documentation on the marine resources of the site. IUCN MANAGEMENT CATEGORY 1a Strict Nature Reserve BIOGEOGRAPHICAL PROVINCE Insulantarctica (7.4.9) GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION Located in the southern Indian Ocean 4,100 km south-west of Australia and 1,700 km north of Mawson Base, Antarctica. Heard Island is at 53°06'S by 73°30'E with the McDonald Islands 43.5 km west of it at 53°03'S by 72°36'E.
    [Show full text]
  • South, Tasmania
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect.
    [Show full text]
  • National Wetland Plant List: 2016 Wetland Ratings
    Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1–17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X THE NATIONAL WETLAND PLANT LIST: 2016 WETLAND RATINGS ROBERT W. LICHVAR U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory 72 Lyme Road Hanover, New Hampshire 03755-1290 DARIN L. BANKS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7 Watershed Support, Wetland and Stream Protection Section 11201 Renner Boulevard Lenexa, Kansas 66219 WILLIAM N. KIRCHNER U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1 911 NE 11 th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232 NORMAN C. MELVIN USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Central National Technology Support Center 501 W. Felix Street, Bldg. 23 Fort Worth, Texas 76115-3404 ABSTRACT The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) administers the National Wetland Plant List (NWPL) for the United States (U.S.) and its territories. Responsibility for the NWPL was transferred to the Corps from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) in 2006. From 2006 to 2012 the Corps led an interagency effort to update the list in conjunction with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the FWS, and the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), culminating in the publication of the 2012 NWPL. In 2013 and 2014 geographic ranges and nomenclature were updated. This paper presents the fourth update of the list under Corps administration. During the current update, the indicator status of 1689 species was reviewed. A total of 306 ratings of 186 species were changed during the update.
    [Show full text]