GLESS RANCH Gless Ranch & Barton Street, Riverside, CA MAJOR 4 WAY INTERSECTION in the HEART of ORANGECREST RIVERSIDE

GLESS RANCH Gless Ranch & Barton Street, Riverside, CA MAJOR 4 WAY INTERSECTION IN THE HEART OF ORANGECREST RIVERSIDE

JAY NICHOLS CHASE HARVEY JOHN JENNINGS DRE# 01905191 DRE# 01954291 DRE# 02025511 909.942.4685 909.942.4686 909.942.4683 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] GLESS RANCH: MAJOR 4 WAY INTERSECEXISTINGTION IN TH FRUITE HEA RSTANDT OF ORANGECREST RIVERSIDE PROPERTY FEATURES TO REMAIN • Last major Commercial/Retail site in Orangecrest PROPOSED

• Signalized intersection in an 9 8 expanding area of Riverside 7 • ADT count of 63,685 CPD on the main artery of Van Buren with access to the I-215 freeway • The site is located in a strong 5 10 3 demographic area 6 1 • Five major schools in the immediate area • Neighboring the 1,300 acre master 4 2 planned Meridian Parkway Business 11 Center

SITE PLAN KEY

Major 1 ±124,076 SF MAJOR 1 Major 2 ±138,516 SF 124,076 SF PROPOSED Major 3 ±43,830 SF 1 Pad 1 ±4,560 SF 2 Pad 2 ±4,920 SF 3 Pad 3 ±4,299 SF MAJOR 3 4 Pad 4 ±6,000 SF 43,830 SF 5 Pad 5 ±17,369 SF MAJOR 2 138,516 SF 6 Pad 6 ±2,500 SF 7 Pad 7 ±7,500 SF 8 Pad 8 ±7,500 SF 9 Pad 9 ±6,750 SF 10 Pad 10 ±7,000 SF 11 Pad 11 ±9,180 SF

PROPERTY DEMOGRAPHICSLat/Lon: 33.8872/-117.3168 RS1 16275 Barton St 1 mi radius 3 mi radius 5 mi radius Riverside, CA 92508

2019 Estimated Population 0 T 15,056 50,867 150,403 2024 Projected Population 0 T 16,079 54,340 160,717 2010 Census Population 0 T 14,365 47,354 140,239 2000 Census Population 0 T 7,454 27,593 102,173

Projected Annual Growth 2019 to 2024 - 1.4% 1.4% 1.4%

POPULATION Historical Annual Growth 2000 to 2019 - 5.4% 4.4% 2.5%

2019 Median Age 34.6 35.7 34.7

2019 Estimated Households 0 T 4,163 14,681 44,644 2024 Projected Households 0 T 4,337 15,310 46,541 2010 Census Households 0 T 3,946 13,549 41,295 2000 Census Households 0 T 2,167 8,277 31,170

Projected Annual Growth 2019 to 2024 - 0.8% 0.9% 0.8% HOUSEHOLDS Historical Annual Growth 2000 to 2019 - 4.8% 4.1% 2.3%

2019 Estimated White - 57.4% 57.4% 51.3% 2019 Estimated Black or African American - 9.5% 9.4% 11.7% 2019 Estimated Asian or Pacific Islander - 13.1% 11.6% 9.1% 2019 Estimated American Indian or Native Alaskan - 0.6% 0.7% 0.8% - 19.3% 20.9% 27.2%

RACE AND RACE ETHNICITY 2019 Estimated Other Races

2019 Estimated Hispanic - 34.6% 37.1% 46.6%

2019 Estimated Average Household Income $0 T $132,076 $132,363 $105,286 2019 Estimated Median Household Income $0 T $120,123 $116,231 $92,868

INCOME 2019 Estimated Per Capita Income $0 T $36,546 $38,271 $31,316

2019 Estimated Elementary (Grade Level 0 to 8) - 4.2% 5.6% 8.7% 2019 Estimated Some High School (Grade Level 9 to 11) - 5.4% 5.1% 8.4% 2019 Estimated High School Graduate - 21.2% 23.7% 26.2% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provided without representation or warranty. or representation without provided is herein information The reliable. be to deemed sources government and private from data using produced was report This 2019 Estimated Some College - 24.3% 23.0% 22.1% 2019 Estimated Associates Degree Only - 8.1% 9.5% 8.5% (AGE 25+) EDUCATION 2019 Estimated Bachelors Degree Only - 22.0% 18.9% 14.8% 2019 Estimated Graduate Degree - 14.6% 14.1% 11.4%

2019 Estimated Total Businesses 0 T 403 1,330 3,779 2019 Estimated Total Employees 0 T 2,819 10,498 41,483 2019 Estimated Employee Population per Business - 7.0 7.9 11.0

BUSINESS 2019 Estimated Residential Population per Business - 37.4 38.2 39.8

FUTURE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

GOING THROUGH ENTITLEMENT GOING THROUGH ENTITLEMENT

JAY NICHOLS CHASE HARVEY JOHN JENNINGS DRE# 01905191 DRE# 01954291 DRE# 02025511 909.942.4685 909.942.4686 909.942.4683 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

This information has been obtained from sources believed reliable. We have not verified it and make no guarantee, warranty or representation about it. Any projections, opinions, assumptions or estimates used are for example only and do not represent the current or future performance Gless Ranch, Riverside, CA / 4 GLESS RANCH of the property. You and your property advisors should conduct a careful, independent investigation of the property to determine to your satisfaction the suitability of the property for your needs. Revised on November 25, 2019 2:51 PM RIVERSIDE CITRUS HISTORY In 1873 Eliza Tibbets convinced William Saunders, Superintendent of the fledgling Bureau of Agriculture, to make her a test grower for his new seedless oranges from Bahia, Brazil. By planting and nurturing the orange trees that Saunders sent her, Tibbets revolutionized the citrus industry. Introduction of these oranges, later called the Washington Navel Orange, proved to be the most successful experiment of Saunders’ tenure, and one of the outstanding events in the economic and social development of California. For the next 60 years and more, a great industry was built up from the two small trees planted in Riverside by Eliza Tibbets.

The citrus industry in California had begun before Tibbets’ introduction of the Washington navel orange. However, there was no outstanding early and midseason variety of sweet orange generally adapted to the climate. Extant citrus was mostly seedling trees grown from seeds obtained locally or from the Spanish missions. Growers experimented, but there was a lack of standardization in quality.

Eliza Tibbets planted the two trees in her garden in 1873. It is widely accepted that she took care of the two remaining trees using dishwater to keep them alive because the Tibbets lot was not connected to canal water. Agriculture officials attribute the success of the two trees that did flourish to Eliza Tibbets’ care. The first fruits borne by these trees were produced in the season of 1875–76. When the Washington navel orange was publicly displayed at a fair in 1879, the valuable commercial characteristics of the fruit, including their quality, shape, size, color, texture, and seedlessness, were immediately recognized. Tibbets’ orange was also ideally suited to Riverside’s semiarid weather, and its thick skin enabled it to be packed and shipped. The contrast between this new fruit and that of seedling trees was so striking that most new grove plantings were of Washington navel oranges. Tibbets sold budwood from her trees to local nurserymen, which led to extensive plantings of nursery trees cloned from hers. Source: wikipedia.com