Dictionary of Cultivated Plants and Their Centres of Diversity A.C. Zeven

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dictionary of Cultivated Plants and Their Centres of Diversity A.C. Zeven Dictionary of cultivated plants and their centres of diversity Excluding ornamentals, forest trees and lower plants A.C. Zeven and P.M. Zhukovsky ,$ Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation Wageningen -1975 ISBN 90 220 0549 6 O Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, 1975 No part of this book may be reproduced and published in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm or any other means without written permission from the publishers Cover design: Pudoc, Wageningen Printed in the Netherlands by Krips Repro, Meppel Contents Preface 7 History of the work 8 Origins of agriculture and plant domestication 9 Cradles of agriculture and centres of diversity 18 1. Chinese-Japanese Centre 27 2. Indochinese-Indonesian Centre 42 3. Australian Centre 57 4. Hindustani Centre 62 5. Central Asian Centre 71 6. Near Eastern Centre 77 7. Mediterranean Centre 91 8. African Centre 107 9. European-Siberian Centre 129 10. South American Centre 144 11. Central American and Mexican Centre 162 12. North American Centre 173 Species with a not identified centre 180 References 182 Index of botanical names Preface The aim of the work is to give the reader quick reference to the Centre of diversity of a cultivated plant species. For some important crops, the Centre of diversity of related wild species is also presented. These wild species are important sources of genes useful to man when incorporated in cultivated crops. Hence such wild species have to be included in genitor collections for breeding. For some cultivated species, the region of diversity could not be identified. Future research may show where they have come from. Species only cultivated as ornamentals or for timber and lower plants have not been included, as in previous work by Zhukovsky. The cultivated species are arranged alphabetically by families and secondarily alphabetically by ge­ nera within a family and tertiarily by species. For several species, taxonomie synonyms and common names are given, if they seemed to be used. The taxonomie classification of families and genera is based on Willis's dictionary (1966). Somatic chromosome numbers and genome constitutions are presented where known. Most of the chromosome numbers are derived from Bolkhovskikh et al. (1969). Where the chromosome number could not be traced, a space has been left. This work concerns many more species than we could know. Corrections, critisisms and additions inclu­ ding data on chromosome number would be highly appreciated. They should be sent to A. C. Zeven, In­ stitute of Plant Breeding, I.v. P., Agricultural University, Lawickse Allee 166, Wageningen, the Nether­ lands. We hope that this work may directly help the plant breeder and ease shortages of food and other agri­ cultural products. We hope that it will also encourage the establishment of natural wild plant reserves in anticipation of future needs for wild genes. P.M. Zhukovsky A.C. Zeven History of thewor k In 1968Prof . P. M. Zhukovsky published a paper 'New centres of origin and new gene centres of cultivated plants including specifically endemic microcentres of species closely allied to cultivated species'. This paper was issued in Botanical Journal, Moskov 53:430-460 and was abstracted in Plant Breeding Abstracts (1968). I wrote to Prof. Zhukovsky asking whether he would prepare an English version. He wrote back that he was preparing a booklet in Russian on the 'World genofund of plants for breeding: world gene centres of cultivated plants and their wild progenitors', which was published in 1970. The text was translated by Dr E.E . Leppik, Research Botanist of the New Crops Research Branch of the US Department of Agri­ culture, Beltsville, Maryland, who invited me to edit the manuscript and to seek a publisher. The publishers suggested that the work be extended to include more cultivated plants. Prof. Zhukovsky agreed to this proposal and the work has now been enlarged from 700 species to about 2300 species. A. C. Zeven. Origin of agriculture and plant domestication INTRODUCTION The origins of agriculture and plant domestication are, in general, closely related phenomena. How­ ever, plants may be domesticated without actually being cultivated; man may intentionally or unintentio­ nally select for characters which are useful to him. Furthermore, agriculture can be carried out with wild plants. Helbaek (1966) suggested that about 7000 BC. wild barley was cultivated. Ruderal plants (campfollowers, dumpheap plants, habitation weeds) grow in an anthropogen environment which may result in idiotype changes of the plants making them less suited to survive in a wild environment. They have been, however slightly, domesticated. The oldest findings of man and human dwellings point to man being a hunter and collector of plant parts and of small animals like snails, larves, eggs and small birds. Nowadays in many regions, even with a high level of agriculture man still gathers wild and semiwild plants or fruits, such as brambles, blueberries, raspberries, mushrooms, herbs for food, heath for brooms, wood for buildings, fuel or paper-making and grass for domestic animals. However, man does not depend on these plants; he only collects them for economic or recreational reasons. If he depended on them he would grow them or find a substitute. Some people may grow them, while others still collect them. We may ask why man started to cultivate plants, why he started to do so only 'recently' and why only certain plant species or varieties have been domesticated. THE ORIGIN OF AGRICULTURE Much has been written about man's change-over from plant collecting to plant growing. Some authors have put forward 'deterministic' hypotheses, such as a higher mental or social level leading to the culti­ vation of plants, or climatic changes causing a progressive desiccation of the country enforcing the application of artificial methods (Spinden, 1917, see MacNeish, 1964). Sauer (1952) however, thought that agriculture cannot have originated solel from chronic food shortage, as four conditions have to be fulfilled first: 1. Previously acquired skills in other fields to start experiments. 2. A sedentary way of living. 3. The presence of wooded lands which are easier to clear than savannahs or forests. Large river valleys subject to periodical flooding are unsuitable, because man was not able to manage the water problems. ORIGIN OF AGRICULTURE 10 4. A marked diversity of the plant populations so that a large reservoir of genes is available for selection. Sauer concluded that the ancestors of the earliest agriculturists were relatively prosperous, pro­ gressive fishermen living in a mild climate along fresh waters. Actually, not much is known about the skills of the first farmers, and the information on the relation between pre-existing sedentism and incipient food production is limited. Extremely old sites with a year- round occupation have only been discovered in the Nile Valley of Upper Egypt (15 000 to 10 500 BC); they show no evidence of plant or animal domestication (Churcher &Smith , 1972). Perhaps the sites found in southern Africa dating from 47 000 BC. (Border Cave in Zululand), 43 000 BC. (Howieson's Poort near Montagu, southwest Cape Province), 42 000 BC. (Rose Cottage Cave near Ladybrand in eastern Orange Free State) belong to this category. However, no evidence has been found yet to show whether these sites were occupied all year round. The botanical material has not yet been analysed (Dart &Beaumont , 1971; Beaumont &Boshier , 1972). The sites where agriculture developed first must have been in areas where plant collectors/hunters/ fishermen roamed. It is most likely that they lived in the wooded lands for hunting game or near water for fishing. Fishing communities lead a sedentary live; nomads return to sites known to them for the richness in animal and plant food. This may have led to annual occupation of sites, each site for several weeks. On such sites the soil may have become bare because of disturbance by man; paths, loam pits, graves, dilapidated mudhouses, and abandoned compounds in general. Near water natural bare lands such as riverbanks, gravel, rocks, screes, landslides and esturial plains may have occurred. Plants pre- adapted to such environments would colonize such sites. Around dwellings many plants would derive from plant parts collected by man and brought to his house. Pre-adapted plants have a weedy tendency and prefer 'open' rich soil conditions. They grow quickly and have large food reserves which enables them to survive in adverse conditions. These make them very suitable for cultivation. They may grow wild in mountainous or hilly areas with a wide topographical diversity. In such areas with many microclimates variants have most chance to survive. After having moved to a disturbed area, man may have found some useful types among them. Other sites where agriculture may have arisen are the refuse heaps (rubbish heaps, dump heaps) on the compounds. Many parts of plants (fruits, seeds, tubers, roots) must have accidently or purposefully been thrown away. They must have developed into plants with a luxurious growth on these fertile places (Anderson, 1952; Burkill, 1952; Chang, 1970; Engelbrecht, 1916; Flannery, 1965; Harlan &d e Wet, 1965; Hawkes, 1969). The sequence in which agriculture arose may be summarized as follows: 1. Wild plants collected by man. 2. Wild plants moved into the temporary or (semi-)permanent dwelling site either by accident or as a gathered plant part, after which fruits, seeds, parts of tubers etc. were lost or thrown away on purpose. This must have continued for an extremely long time. 3. Only pre-adapted highly variable wild plants established and colonized disturbed soil around the dwel­ ling. Man gathered wanted plant parts from some of these weedy plants. 4. Disadvantageous natural selection pressures were reduced and favourable selection pressures were introduced so that variation decreased counteracted by an increase of variation by hybridization and mu­ tation, followed by isolation, protection and selection.
Recommended publications
  • THE EVOLUTION of SEED MORPHOLOGY in DOMESTICATED Chenopodium: an ARCHAEOLOGICAL CASE STUDY
    ]. Ethnobiol. 13(2):149-169 Winter 1993 THE EVOLUTION OF SEED MORPHOLOGY IN DOMESTICATED Chenopodium: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CASE STUDY KRISTEN }. GREMILLION Department of Anthropology The Ohio Stute University Columbus, OH 43210-1364 ABSTRACf.-A large body of data on several key morphological characters has been compiled through examination of collections of archaeological Chenopodium from eastern North America. Contrary to expectations based on change in certain other seed crops, the patterns of variation observed in Chenopodium do not reflect a gradual evolution of seed morphology away from the wild type. Evidence for decreasing levels of morphological variability in the evolving domesticate is like­ wise minimal. These findings demonstrate that the rate and character of crop evolution as revealed in the archaeological record can be expected to vary consid­ erably among taxa. RESUMEN.-Se ha compilado un extenso ouerpo de datos sobre varios carac­ teres morfol6gicos clave mediante el examen de colecciones de Chenopodium arqueol6gico del este de Norteamerica. Contrariamente a las expectativas basadas en el cambio en ciertos otms cultivos de semilla, los patrones de variaci6n obser­ vados en Chenopodium no reflejan una evoluci6n gradual de la morfologia de las semillas en credente distancia del tipo silvestre. La evidencia de niveles decre­ cientes de variabilidad morfol6gica en la especie domesticada en evoluci6n es asimismo minima. Estos resultados demuestran que puede esperarse que la 13sa y el caracter de la evoluci6n de los cultivos, tal y como se revela en el registro arqueol6gico, varien considerablemente entre taxa distintos. REsUME.-Un large ensemble de donnees concernant plusieurs characteres mor­ phologiques importants a ete recueilli en examinant des collections de Cheno­ podium de I'est de I' Amerique.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synopsis of Phaseoleae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) James Andrew Lackey Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1977 A synopsis of Phaseoleae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) James Andrew Lackey Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Lackey, James Andrew, "A synopsis of Phaseoleae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) " (1977). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 5832. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/5832 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile of a Plant: the Olive in Early Medieval Italy, 400-900 CE By
    Profile of a Plant: The Olive in Early Medieval Italy, 400-900 CE by Benjamin Jon Graham A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in the University of Michigan 2014 Doctoral Committee: Professor Paolo Squatriti, Chair Associate Professor Diane Owen Hughes Professor Richard P. Tucker Professor Raymond H. Van Dam © Benjamin J. Graham, 2014 Acknowledgements Planting an olive tree is an act of faith. A cultivator must patiently protect, water, and till the soil around the plant for fifteen years before it begins to bear fruit. Though this dissertation is not nearly as useful or palatable as the olive’s pressed fruits, its slow growth to completion resembles the tree in as much as it was the patient and diligent kindness of my friends, mentors, and family that enabled me to finish the project. Mercifully it took fewer than fifteen years. My deepest thanks go to Paolo Squatriti, who provoked and inspired me to write an unconventional dissertation. I am unable to articulate the ways he has influenced my scholarship, teaching, and life. Ray Van Dam’s clarity of thought helped to shape and rein in my run-away ideas. Diane Hughes unfailingly saw the big picture—how the story of the olive connected to different strands of history. These three people in particular made graduate school a humane and deeply edifying experience. Joining them for the dissertation defense was Richard Tucker, whose capacious understanding of the history of the environment improved this work immensely. In addition to these, I would like to thank David Akin, Hussein Fancy, Tom Green, Alison Cornish, Kathleen King, Lorna Alstetter, Diana Denney, Terre Fisher, Liz Kamali, Jon Farr, Yanay Israeli, and Noah Blan, all at the University of Michigan, for their benevolence.
    [Show full text]
  • Horner-Mclaughlin Woods Compiled by Bev Walters, 2011-2012
    Horner-McLaughlin Woods Compiled by Bev Walters, 2011-2012 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Acer negundo BOX-ELDER Acer nigrum (A. saccharum) BLACK MAPLE Acer rubrum RED MAPLE Acer saccharinum SILVER MAPLE Acer saccharum SUGAR MAPLE Achillea millefolium YARROW Actaea pachypoda DOLL'S-EYES Adiantum pedatum MAIDENHAIR FERN Agrimonia gryposepala TALL AGRIMONY Agrimonia parviflora SWAMP AGRIMONY Agrimonia pubescens SOFT AGRIMONY AGROSTIS GIGANTEA REDTOP Agrostis perennans AUTUMN BENT Alisma subcordatum (A. plantago-aquatica) SOUTHERN WATER-PLANTAIN Alisma triviale (A. plantago-aquatica) NORTHERN WATER-PLANTAIN ALLIARIA PETIOLATA GARLIC MUSTARD Allium tricoccum WILD LEEK Ambrosia artemisiifolia COMMON RAGWEED Amelanchier arborea JUNEBERRY Amelanchier interior SERVICEBERRY Amphicarpaea bracteata HOG-PEANUT Anemone quinquefolia WOOD ANEMONE Anemone virginiana THIMBLEWEED Antennaria parlinii SMOOTH PUSSYTOES Apocynum androsaemifolium SPREADING DOGBANE ARCTIUM MINUS COMMON BURDOCK Arisaema triphyllum JACK-IN-THE-PULPIT Asarum canadense WILD-GINGER Asclepias exaltata POKE MILKWEED Asclepias incarnata SWAMP MILKWEED Asplenium platyneuron EBONY SPLEENWORT Athyrium filix-femina LADY FERN BERBERIS THUNBERGII JAPANESE BARBERRY Bidens cernua NODDING BEGGAR-TICKS Bidens comosa SWAMP TICKSEED Bidens connata PURPLE-STEMMED TICKSEED Bidens discoidea SWAMP BEGGAR-TICKS Bidens frondosa COMMON BEGGAR-TICKS Boehmeria cylindrica FALSE NETTLE Botrypus virginianus RATTLESNAKE FERN BROMUS INERMIS SMOOTH BROME Bromus pubescens CANADA BROME Calamagrostis canadensis BLUE-JOINT
    [Show full text]
  • Well-Known Plants in Each Angiosperm Order
    Well-known plants in each angiosperm order This list is generally from least evolved (most ancient) to most evolved (most modern). (I’m not sure if this applies for Eudicots; I’m listing them in the same order as APG II.) The first few plants are mostly primitive pond and aquarium plants. Next is Illicium (anise tree) from Austrobaileyales, then the magnoliids (Canellales thru Piperales), then monocots (Acorales through Zingiberales), and finally eudicots (Buxales through Dipsacales). The plants before the eudicots in this list are considered basal angiosperms. This list focuses only on angiosperms and does not look at earlier plants such as mosses, ferns, and conifers. Basal angiosperms – mostly aquatic plants Unplaced in order, placed in Amborellaceae family • Amborella trichopoda – one of the most ancient flowering plants Unplaced in order, placed in Nymphaeaceae family • Water lily • Cabomba (fanwort) • Brasenia (watershield) Ceratophyllales • Hornwort Austrobaileyales • Illicium (anise tree, star anise) Basal angiosperms - magnoliids Canellales • Drimys (winter's bark) • Tasmanian pepper Laurales • Bay laurel • Cinnamon • Avocado • Sassafras • Camphor tree • Calycanthus (sweetshrub, spicebush) • Lindera (spicebush, Benjamin bush) Magnoliales • Custard-apple • Pawpaw • guanábana (soursop) • Sugar-apple or sweetsop • Cherimoya • Magnolia • Tuliptree • Michelia • Nutmeg • Clove Piperales • Black pepper • Kava • Lizard’s tail • Aristolochia (birthwort, pipevine, Dutchman's pipe) • Asarum (wild ginger) Basal angiosperms - monocots Acorales
    [Show full text]
  • Pyganic Gardening Specimen Label
    Specimen Label • Provides rapid knockdown and kill of listed plant pests • Non-persistent in the environment • Kills more than 100 listed insects, including aphids, beetles, caterpillars, fruit flies, mites and thrips • Flushes insects and mites from hiding • One pint makes up to 16 gallons For Organic Gardening KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN CAUTION • PRECAUCIÓN ACTIVE INGREDIENT: Pyrethrins a botanical insecticide ..................................................1.40% Si usted no entiende la etiqueta, busque a alguien para que se la explique a usted en detalle. OTHER INGREDIENTS .................................................................98.60% (If you do not understand the label, find someone to explain it to you in detail.) 100.00% See inside for first aid and precautionary statements. DIRECTIONS FOR USE It is a violation of Federal law to use this product in a manner inconsistent with its labeling. USE RESTRICTIONS: Dilute 1 to 1.4 fl. oz. of PyGanic® Gardening per gallon of water per • Do not apply this product in a way that will contact workers or other 1,000 sq. ft. persons, either directly or through drift. • Do not make applications during the rain. For larger gardens apply 16 to 59 fl. oz. of PyGanic® Gardening per acre [by • Do not wet plants to the point of runoff. ground in sufficient water for thorough coverage. Do not exceed the maximum • Not for use in outdoor residential misting systems (indoor or outdoor). application rates of 1.4 fl. oz. PyGanic® Gardening per 1,000 sq. ft. or • Do not allow adults, children, or pets to enter the treated area 59 fl. oz. PyGanic® Gardening per acre.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of a Global Network for the in Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: Status and Needs
    THEMATIC BACKGROUND STUDY Establishment of a Global Network for the In Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: Status and Needs Nigel Maxted and Shelagh Kell BACKGROUND STUDY PAPER NO. 39 October 2009 COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ESTABLISHMENT OF A GLOBAL NETWORK FOR THE IN SITU CONSERVATION OF CROP WILD RELATIVES: STATUS AND NEEDS by *By Nigel Maxted and Shelagh Kell The content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not .necessarily represent the views of the FAO, or its Members 2 * School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham. Disclaimer The content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not necessarily represent the views of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), or its Members. The designations employed and the presentation of material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. CONTENTS SUMMARY 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 PART 1: INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 Background and scope 8 1.2 The global and local importance of crop wild relatives 10 1.3 Definition of a crop wild relative 12 1.4 Global numbers of crop
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Pellets from Three Forest Species: from Raw Material to End Use
    Article Assessment of Pellets from Three Forest Species: From Raw Material to End Use Miguel Alfonso Quiñones-Reveles 1,Víctor Manuel Ruiz-García 2,* , Sarai Ramos-Vargas 2 , Benedicto Vargas-Larreta 1 , Omar Masera-Cerutti 2 , Maginot Ngangyo-Heya 3 and Artemio Carrillo-Parra 4,* 1 Sustainable Forest Development Master of Science Program, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de El Salto, El Salto, Pueblo Nuevo 34942, Mexico; [email protected] (M.A.Q.-R.); [email protected] (B.V.-L.) 2 Bioenergy Laboratory and Bioenergy Innovation and Assessment Laboratory (LINEB), Ecosystems Research Institute and Sustainability (IIES), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Morelia 58190, Mexico; [email protected] (S.R.-V.); [email protected] (O.M.-C.) 3 Faculty of Agronomy (FA), Autonomous University of Nuevo León (UANL), Francisco Villa s/n, Col. Ex-Hacienda “El Canadá”, Escobedo 66050, Mexico; [email protected] 4 Institute of Silviculture and Wood Industry (ISIMA), Juarez University of the State of Durango (UJED), Boulevard del Guadiana 501, Ciudad Universitaria, Torre de Investigación, Durango 34120, Mexico * Correspondence: [email protected] (V.M.R.-G.); [email protected] (A.C.-P.) Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the relationship between chemical properties, energy efficiency, and emissions of wood and pellets from madroño Arbutus xalapensis Kunth, tázcate Juniperus deppeana Steud, and encino colorado Quercus sideroxyla Humb. & Bonpl. in two gasifiers (top-lit-up-draft (T-LUD) and electricity
    [Show full text]
  • REED CANARY GRASS) SEED to GERMINATION By
    RELATION OF CERTAIN PHYSICAL CHARACTERS OF PHALARIS ARUNDINACEAE (REED CANARY GRASS) SEED TO GERMINATION by HAROLD ErHJN FINNELL A THESIS subimitted to the OREGON STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE in partial fulfilLuont of the requirementa for the degree of MASTER 0F SCIENCE June l96 t APPROVED: Profes3or of Farm Crops In Charge o Major Chairman of School Graduato Cozitteo Ohairîmn of Collego Graduate Council ACKNO LELOi:ÌNTs The writer wisnes to expres8 his deep appreciation to ruCeusor G. R. Hyslop, [load of the Farm Crops Depart- ment, for naking this study possible and for his many kindly ougei ions and aid th correction of the manuscript. Aciow1ec1gement is also duo Mrs. Grace Cole Fleiscbirian, Assistant Botanist, in charge cf the Cooperative Seed Testing Iboratory at the Oregon Stato Ariouitura1 Co11ee, for hor many suggestions and loaning of equipment. Thc wrIter 13 ccceodIng1y grateful to other person.s responsible in any way for any part of this study. CONTEIITS Introduction i Upland Rood Canary Grais 2 Historical Sketch 3 Problem 5 Purpose 5 Approach 5 Procedure G V.eight por Bushel and Volume Weight Studies G Volume Weight Method 7 Color Examination 7 Seed Condition 8 Germination Method B Discussion 9 Oregon Certification Standards 9 Origin of Standards li Laboratory Procedure li Germination 12 Counts 13 Special Testing Methods 14 Color and Weight per Bushel Studies 16 Vo lume Weight Data 19 Germination Test 21 Discussion (continued) rusty Seed 27 Average Analysis 29 Harvest ethods 31 Cone lus ion 33 Exhibit A 34 Exhibit B 35 Exhibit C 36 Bibliography 37 i RELATION OF CERTAIN PHYSICAL CHARACTERS OF PHALARIS ARUNDINACEAE (RETe CANARY GRASS) SETD TO GERLIINATION Introduct ion Throughout the years of conirnerciai production of Reed Canary grass seed (Phalaris arundinaceso) in Oregon, controversies have arisen between 'owers nd buyers because of misunderstandinrs on seed quality, perticularly with reference to germination.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Maleae (Rosaceae) Based on Multiple Chloroplast Regions: Implications to Genera Circumscription
    Hindawi BioMed Research International Volume 2018, Article ID 7627191, 10 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7627191 Research Article Phylogeny of Maleae (Rosaceae) Based on Multiple Chloroplast Regions: Implications to Genera Circumscription Jiahui Sun ,1,2 Shuo Shi ,1,2,3 Jinlu Li,1,4 Jing Yu,1 Ling Wang,4 Xueying Yang,5 Ling Guo ,6 and Shiliang Zhou 1,2 1 State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China 2University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100043, China 3College of Life Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China 4Te Department of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China 5Key Laboratory of Forensic Genetics, Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing 100038, China 6Beijing Botanical Garden, Beijing 100093, China Correspondence should be addressed to Ling Guo; [email protected] and Shiliang Zhou; [email protected] Received 21 September 2017; Revised 11 December 2017; Accepted 2 January 2018; Published 19 March 2018 Academic Editor: Fengjie Sun Copyright © 2018 Jiahui Sun et al. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Maleae consists of economically and ecologically important plants. However, there are considerable disputes on generic circumscription due to the lack of a reliable phylogeny at generic level. In this study, molecular phylogeny of 35 generally accepted genera in Maleae is established using 15 chloroplast regions. Gillenia isthemostbasalcladeofMaleae,followedbyKageneckia + Lindleya, Vauquelinia, and a typical radiation clade, the core Maleae, suggesting that the proposal of four subtribes is reasonable.
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Risk Assessment for Phalaris Paradoxa L. (Poaceae)
    Weed Risk Assessment for Phalaris United States paradoxa L. (Poaceae) – Awned Department of canary-grass Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service September 27, 2016 Version 1 Photos of Phalaris paradoxa from Rignanese (2007). Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service United States Department of Agriculture 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Weed Risk Assessment for Phalaris paradoxa Introduction Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) regulates noxious weeds under the authority of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000) and the Federal Seed Act (7 U.S.C. § 1581-1610, 1939). A noxious weed is defined as “any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the public health, or the environment” (7 U.S.C. § 7701- 7786, 2000). We use the PPQ weed risk assessment (WRA) process (PPQ, 2015) to evaluate the risk potential of plants, including those newly detected in the United States, those proposed for import, and those emerging as weeds elsewhere in the world. The PPQ WRA process includes three analytical components that together describe the risk profile of a plant species (risk potential, uncertainty, and geographic potential; PPQ, 2015). At the core of the process is the predictive risk model that evaluates the baseline invasive/weed potential of a plant species using information related to its ability to establish, spread, and cause harm in natural, anthropogenic, and production systems (Koop et al., 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF (2126K)
    _??_1994 The Japan Mendel Society Cytologia 59: 295 -304 , 1994 Cytotypes and Meiotic Behavior in Mexican Populations of Three Species of Echeandia (Liliaceae) Guadalupe Palomino and Javier Martinez Laboratorio de Citogenetica, Jardin Botanico , Instituto de Biologia, Apartado Postal 70-614, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, D . F. 04510, Mexico Accepted June 2, 1994 Echeandia Ort. includes herbaceous perennials distributed from the Southwestern United States to South America. More than 60 species have been described from Mexico and Central America, many of which are narrow endemics (Cruden 1986, 1987, 1993, 1994, Cruden and McVaugh 1989). Mexico is considered the center of origin and evolution for this genus (Cruden pers. comm.). They are commonly found in pine and pine/oak forest, grasslands; xerophyte shrublands, and disturbed areas, (Cruden 1981, 1986, 1987, Cruden and McVaugh 1989). Except polyploidy species based on n=8, as E. longipedicellata n=40, (Cruden 1981); E. altipratensis n=24, and 48; E. luteola n=32, and 64; E. venusta n=84, (Cruden 1986, 1994), chromosomes those exist, little information on interspecific or intraspecific variation in karyo types in Echeandia. In 1988, Palomino and Romo described the karyotypes of E. flavescens (Benth.) Cruden (as E. leptophylla) and E. nana (Baker) Cruden, both of which are characterized by 2 pairs of chromosomes with satellites. Cytotype variation has been observed commonly in the families Liliaceae, Iridaceae, Commelinaceae, and some Poaceae, Acanthaceae and Leguminosae. It is usually due to the presence of spontaneous aberrations in number or structure, heterozygous inversions, Roberts onian translocations, exchanges, deletions and duplications (Sen 1975, Araki 1975, Araki et al.
    [Show full text]