The Fusarium Wilt Resistance Locus Fom-2 of Melon Contains a Single Resistance Gene with Complex Features

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Fusarium Wilt Resistance Locus Fom-2 of Melon Contains a Single Resistance Gene with Complex Features The Plant Journal (2004), 39, 283–297 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02134.x The fusarium wilt resistance locus Fom-2 of melon contains a single resistance gene with complex features Tarek Joobeur1, Joseph J. King2, Shelly J. Nolin1, Claude E. Thomas3 and Ralph A. Dean1,* 1Department of Plant Pathology, Fungal Genomics Laboratory, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27965, USA, 2Seminis Vegetable Seeds, 37437 State Highway 16, Woodland, CA 95695, USA, and 3USDA-ARS, US Vegetable Laboratory, Charleston, SC 29414, USA Received 19 March 2004; revised 20 April 2004; accepted 10 May 2004. *For correspondence (fax þ1 919 513 0024; e-mail [email protected]). Summary The soil-borne fungus Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. melonis causes significant losses in the cultivated melon, a key member of the economically important family, the Cucurbitaceae. Here, we report the map-based cloning and characterization of the resistance gene Fom-2 that confers resistance to race 0 and 1 of this plant pathogen. Two recombination events, 75 kb apart, were found to bracket Fom-2 after screening approximately 1324 gametes with PCR-based markers. Sequence analysis of the Fom-2 interval revealed the presence of two candidate genes. One candidate gene showed significant similarity to previously characterized resistance genes. Sequence analysis of this gene revealed clear polymorphisms between resistant and susceptible materials and was therefore designated as Fom-2. Analysis of susceptible breeding lines (BL) presenting a haplotype very similar to the resistant cultivar MR-1 indicated that a gene conversion had occurred in Fom-2, resulting in a significant rearrangement of this gene. The second candidate gene which shared high similarity to an essential gene in Arabidopsis, presented an almost identical sequence in MR-1 and BL, further supporting Fom-2 identity. The gene conversion in Fom-2 produced a truncated R gene, revealing new insights into R gene evolution. Fom-2 was predicted to encode an NBS-LRR type R protein of the non-TIR subfamily. In contrast to most members of this class a coiled-coil structure was predicted within the LRR region rather than in the N-terminal. The Fom-2 physical region contained retroelement-like sequences and truncated genes, suggest- ing that this locus is complex. Keywords: Fom-2, melon, complex R locus, fine mapping, BAC end sequence, R gene evolution. Introduction The cultivated melon (Cucumis melo L.), an economically viable in the soil as chlamydospores for decades. An important member of the Cucurbitaceae family, includes a effective control for this pathogen is through host resist- diverse group of annual trailing-vine plants such as the ance (Martyn and Gordon, 1996). However, resistant vari- cantaloupe, honeydew, casaba, snake melon, pickling eties often lack the appropriate traits for the commercial melon, mango melon, and snap melon (McCreight et al., market. Traditional artificial inoculation used to evaluate 1993). In the US, over 120 000 acres of melons (cantaloupe resistance to fusarium wilt is a time consuming process and and honeydew) are grown annually, and in 1998 nearly susceptible plants may escape detection (Burger et al., 1 million tons of melons were produced with a total value 2003). Thus, molecular markers tightly linked to fusarium of over 500 million dollars (http://www.usda.gov/nass/). wilt resistance genes are highly valued in melon breeding. However, the full economic value of this crop has not been Currently, four races (0, 1, 2, and 1, 2) of the pathogen are achieved because of diseases caused primarily by fungi, defined by their capacity to incite disease in different vari- such as fusarium wilt, and powdery and downy mildews. eties of melons. Resistance to race 1 and race 2 is conferred Fusarium wilt, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. mel- by a single dominant gene Fom-2 and Fom-1, respectively. onis, is one of the most difficult diseases to control pri- Both genes also confer resistance to race 0 (Schreuder marily because the pathogen is soil-borne and remains et al., 2000; Zink and Thomas, 1990). ª 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 283 284 Tarek Joobeur et al. Typically, race/cultivar-specific resistance is proposed to interval. A single candidate gene with significant similarity involve the recognition of the pathogen avirulence (avr) to previously characterized R genes was found and gene product by the complementary host resistance (R) designated as Fom-2. Evidence for this gene being gene protein. This recognition initiates a signal transduction Fom-2 was provided by the sequence analysis of alleles cascade and the defense response (Hammond-Kosack and from susceptible and resistant cultivars of the two iden- Jones, 1997; Martin et al., 2003). Several R-genes have been tified candidate genes. Sequence analysis of the two BAC isolated by map-based cloning and transposon-tagging clones encompassing Fom-2 showed the presence of strategies (Martin et al., 2003). Interestingly, R genes that several retroelement-like sequences as well as truncated confer resistance to different types of pathogens encode genes, typically found in complex loci. Comparison very similar proteins. A major class of R genes encodes between closely related resistant and susceptible haplo- proteins that contain leucine-rich (LRR) and nucleotide- types strongly indicated that truncated R genes could be binding site (NBS) domains and are likely located in the produced by gene conversion, revealing novel insights cytoplasm. This class can be divided into two subfamilies, into the R gene evolution. the TIR and the non-TIR, depending on the presence of a domain at the N-terminal with similarity to the Toll/interleu- Results kin-1 receptor (TIR) (Meyers et al., 1999). The former sub- family includes the resistance genes M and L6 from flax, N Fom-2 fine mapping from tobacco, and RPP5 from Arabidopsis. The non-TIR subfamily comprises RPS2 and RPM1 from Arabidopsis and In a previous work, we developed two co-dominant PCR- I2 and Prf from tomato. R proteins of the non-TIR class are based markers, FM and AM, that cosegregated with Fom-2 often predicted to have a coiled-coil (CC) structure near their (Wang et al., 2000). In addition, two AFLP markers ACT/CAT1 N-terminus and are referred to as the CC-NBS-LRR class. and AAC/CAT1 were found to flank Fom-2 at 1.7 and 3.3 cM, Other R genes, such as Xa21 in rice, encode a protein that is respectively. We used these markers to map Fom-2 using a likely located in the plasma membrane and presents an population (named Vad375) containing 159 RILs derived extracellular LRR domain and a cytoplasmic kinase domain. from the cultivar ‘Ve´ drantais’ and PI 161375. New primer The Cf proteins (Dixon et al., 1996) in tomato and the pairs were designed for FM and AM, producing smaller HS1Pro-1 (Cai et al., 1997) in sugar beet predominantly fragments that were suitable for analysis with ABI 377s consist of LRR domains. Few R proteins have been described (SSR154 for FM and STS178 for AM). SSR154 and STS178 to lack the LRR motif. One such example is the recently were found to flank Fom-2 at 2 and 4 recombination events, identified RPW8 protein in Arabidopsis that is predicted to respectively (Figure 1). The AFLP markers ACT/CAT1 and contain a CC structure (Xiao et al., 2001). AAC/CAT1 were used to create PCR-based markers for Resistance genes are continuously evolving to produce screening the Vad375 population. The AFLP fragments were new specificities in order to recognize mutated avr genes. isolated, cloned and sequenced. The resulting fragments Understanding the mechanisms governing R gene evolution were utilized to screen a HindIII BAC library of melon (Luo is therefore of major interest. Important insights were et al., 2001). The AAC/CAT fragment was considered repet- obtained from the sequence analysis of R genes loci from itive because several hundred BAC clones were identified. different species and haplotypes (Michelmore and Meyers, However, the ACT/CAT1 marker identified 23 BAC clones, 1998). New specificities are postulated to be the result of indicating this fragment was present as a single copy in the diversifying selection, interallelic recombination and gene genome. Restriction fragment analysis with the FPC pro- conversion. Resistance genes are often organized in tandem gram showed that all the clones belonged to the same repeats of paralogues and this structure is postulated to play contig. Two SSR markers SSR138 and SSR180 were derived a role in their evolution through additional mechanisms from the BAC end sequences. After screening the Vad375 such as unequal crossing-over (Chin et al., 2001; Parniske population, SSR138 was found to cosegregate with Fom-2 et al., 1997). (Figure 1). Interestingly, one recombination event was found Here, we report the map-based cloning and character- between SSR180 and Fom-2 indicating that Fom-2 is located ization of the first R gene in the Cucurbitaceae family, between SSR180 and STS178 (Figure 1). All markers and the Fom-2. Bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) libraries resistance phenotype followed the expected segregation were screened with probes linked to Fom-2 and a physical ratio (1:1) for a co-dominant marker (P ¼ 0.93). The observed map of the interval was constructed. PCR-based markers frequency of heterozygous RILs was not significantly derived from the BAC end sequences were used to (P ¼ 0.29) different from the expected value, 4.20%. localize Fom-2 into two BAC clones. Fom-2 was further Screening additional populations (SF6 and IndF7; Table 1) delimited to 75 kb size-interval using additional markers with the Fom-2 flanking markers SSR154 and STS178 developed from the sequence of these BAC clones. revealed 15 recombinant plants (Figure 2a).
Recommended publications
  • Recent Advances in Effector-Triggered Immunity in Plants: New Pieces in the Puzzle Create a Different Paradigm
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Recent Advances in Effector-Triggered Immunity in Plants: New Pieces in the Puzzle Create a Different Paradigm Quang-Minh Nguyen 1,† , Arya Bagus Boedi Iswanto 1,† , Geon Hui Son 1 and Sang Hee Kim 1,2,* 1 Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four Program), Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center, Gyeongsang National University, 501 Jinju-daero, Jinju 52828, Korea; [email protected] (Q.-M.N.); [email protected] (A.B.B.I.); [email protected] (G.H.S.) 2 Division of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, 501 Jinju-daero, Jinju 52828, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Plants rely on multiple immune systems to protect themselves from pathogens. When pattern-triggered immunity (PTI)—the first layer of the immune response—is no longer effective as a result of pathogenic effectors, effector-triggered immunity (ETI) often provides resistance. In ETI, host plants directly or indirectly perceive pathogen effectors via resistance proteins and launch a more robust and rapid defense response. Resistance proteins are typically found in the form of nucleotide- binding and leucine-rich-repeat-containing receptors (NLRs). Upon effector recognition, an NLR undergoes structural change and associates with other NLRs. The dimerization or oligomerization of NLRs signals to downstream components, activates “helper” NLRs, and culminates in the ETI response. Originally, PTI was thought to contribute little to ETI. However, most recent studies revealed crosstalk and cooperation between ETI and PTI. Here, we summarize recent advancements Citation: Nguyen, Q.-M.; Iswanto, in our understanding of the ETI response and its components, as well as how these components A.B.B.; Son, G.H.; Kim, S.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive and Memory Functions in Plant Immunity
    Review Cognitive and Memory Functions in Plant Immunity Hidetaka Yakura Institute for Science and Human Existence, Tokyo 163-8001, Japan; [email protected] Received: 5 August 2020; Accepted: 16 September 2020; Published: 17 September 2020 Abstract: From the time of Thucydides in the 5th century BC, it has been known that specific recognition of pathogens and memory formation are critical components of immune functions. In contrast to the immune system of jawed vertebrates, such as humans and mice, plants lack a circulatory system with mobile immune cells and a repertoire of clonally distributed antigen receptors with almost unlimited specificities. However, without these systems and mechanisms, plants can live and survive in the same hostile environment faced by other organisms. In fact, they achieve specific pathogen recognition and elimination, with limited self-reactivity, and generate immunological memory, sometimes with transgenerational characteristics. Thus, the plant immune system satisfies minimal conditions for constituting an immune system, namely, the recognition of signals in the milieu, integration of that information, subsequent efficient reaction based on the integrated information, and memorization of the experience. In the previous report, this set of elements was proposed as an example of minimal cognitive functions. In this essay, I will first review current understanding of plant immunity and then discuss the unique features of cognitive activities, including recognition of signals from external as well as internal environments, autoimmunity, and memory formation. In doing so, I hope to reach a deeper understanding of the significance of immunity omnipresent in the realm of living organisms. Keywords: autoimmunity; cognition; metaphysicalization; plant immunity; transgenerational memory 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Prrs and NB-Lrrs: from Signal Perception to Activation of Plant Innate Immunity
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review PRRs and NB-LRRs: From Signal Perception to Activation of Plant Innate Immunity Ali Noman 1,2,* , Muhammad Aqeel 3 and Yonggen Lou 1,* 1 Institute of Insect Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China 2 Department of Botany, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan 3 State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, School of Life Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.N.); [email protected] (Y.L.); Tel.: +86-571-889-8622 (Y.L.) Received: 18 February 2019; Accepted: 10 April 2019; Published: 16 April 2019 Abstract: To ward off pathogens and pests, plants use a sophisticated immune system. They use pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), as well as nucleotide-binding and leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) domains, for detecting nonindigenous molecular signatures from pathogens. Plant PRRs induce local and systemic immunity. Plasma-membrane-localized PRRs are the main components of multiprotein complexes having additional transmembrane and cytosolic kinases. Topical research involving proteins and their interactive partners, along with transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation, has extended our understanding of R-gene-mediated plant immunity. The unique LRR domain conformation helps in the best utilization of a surface area and essentially mediates protein–protein interactions. Genome-wide analyses of inter- and intraspecies PRRs and NB-LRRs offer innovative information about their working and evolution. We reviewed plant immune responses with relevance to PRRs and NB-LRRs. This article focuses on the significant functional diversity, pathogen-recognition mechanisms, and subcellular compartmentalization of plant PRRs and NB-LRRs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Collection of Experimentally Validated Plant Nlrs
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.08.193961; this version posted January 31, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. RefPlantNLR: a comprehensive collection of experimentally validated plant NLRs Jiorgos Kourelis, Toshiyuki Sakai, Hiroaki Adachi, and Sophien Kamoun* The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK *Correspondence: [email protected] ABSTRACT Reference datasets are critical in computational biology. They help define canonical biological features and are essential for benchmarking studies. Here, we describe a comprehensive reference dataset of experimentally validated plant NLR immune receptors. RefPlantNLR consists of 442 NLRs from 31 genera belonging to 11 orders of flowering plants. This reference dataset has several applications. We used RefPlantNLR to determine the canonical features of functionally validated plant NLRs and to benchmark the five most popular NLR annotation tools. This revealed that although NLR annotation tools tend to retrieve the majority of NLRs, they frequently produce domain architectures that are inconsistent with the RefPlantNLR annotation. Guided by this analysis, we developed a new pipeline, NLRtracker, which extracts and annotates NLRs based on the core features found in the RefPlantNLR dataset. The RefPlantNLR dataset should also prove useful for guiding comparative analyses of NLRs across the wide spectrum of plant diversity and identifying under-studied taxa. We hope that the RefPlantNLR resource will contribute to moving the field beyond a uniform view of NLR structure and function.
    [Show full text]
  • Self/Nonself Perception and Recognition Mechanisms in Plants: a Comparison of Self-Incompatibility and Innate Immunity
    Review BlackwellOxford,NPHNew0028-646X1464-5491©240310.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02403.xFebruary0503???513???Research The Phytologist Authors UKreview review2008 Publishing (2008). Ltd Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2008) Research reviewResearch review Self/nonself perception and recognition mechanisms in plants: a comparison of self-incompatibility and innate immunity Author for correspondence: Natasha Sanabria1, Daphne Goring2, Thorsten Nürnberger3 and Ian A. Dubery Ian Dubery1 Tel: +27 11 559 2401 Fax: +27 11 559 2401 1Department of Biochemistry, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa; 2Department Email: [email protected] of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; 3Centre for Plant Molecular Received: 3 December 2007 Biology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany Accepted: 14 January 2008 Summary Key words: innate immunity, leucine-rich Analyses of emerging concepts indicate that parallels exist between self- repeats, pathogen-associated molecular incompatibility and pathogen recognition. In the case of surveillance of ‘nonself’, patterns, pattern-recognition receptors, plant immune responses are triggered either by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) receptor-like kinases, resistance genes, that detect conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or by S domains, self-incompatibility. resistance (R) proteins recognizing isolate-specific pathogen effectors. PAMP detection is an important component of innate immunity in plants and serves as an early warning system for the presence of potential pathogens and activation of plant defense mechanisms. In the Brassicaceae, the recognition of ‘self’ and self-incompatibility are components of a receptor-ligand based mechanism that utilizes an S receptor kinase (SRK) to perceive and reject ‘self’-pollen. SRK is an S-domain receptor-like kinase (RLK), which in turn is part of the RLK family, some members of which represent PRRs involved in the detection of PAMPs.
    [Show full text]
  • Fine Mapping of the Pc Locus of Sorghum Bicolor, a Gene Controlling the Reaction to a Fungal Pathogen and Its Host-Selective Toxin
    Theor Appl Genet (2007) 114:961–970 DOI 10.1007/s00122-006-0481-1 ORIGINAL PAPER Fine mapping of the Pc locus of Sorghum bicolor, a gene controlling the reaction to a fungal pathogen and its host-selective toxin Ervin D. Nagy · Tso-Ching Lee · Wusirika Ramakrishna · Zijun Xu · Patricia E. Klein · Phillip SanMiguel · Chiu-Ping Cheng · Jingling Li · Katrien M. Devos · Keith Schertz · Larry Dunkle · JeVrey L. Bennetzen Received: 26 July 2006 / Accepted: 30 November 2006 / Published online: 14 March 2007 © Springer-Verlag 2007 Abstract Milo disease in sorghum is caused by isolates sorghum suggests that one or more members of this NBS- of the soil-borne fungus Periconia circinata that produce LRR gene family are the Pc genes that condition suscepti- PC-toxin. Susceptibility to milo disease is conditioned by a bility. single, semi-dominant gene, termed Pc. The susceptible allele (Pc) converts to a resistant form (pc) spontaneously at a gametic frequency of 10¡3 to 10¡4. A high-density Introduction genetic map was constructed around the Pc locus using DNA markers, allowing the Pc gene to be delimited to a Plant responses to potential pathogens are frequently gov- 0.9 cM region on the short arm of sorghum chromosome 9. erned by speciWc interactions between elicitor compounds Physically, the Pc-region was covered by a single BAC secreted by the pathogen and plant resistance gene prod- clone. Sequence analysis of this BAC revealed twelve gene ucts. Although the known pathogenic elicitors represent a candidates. Several of the predicted genes in the region are wide assortment of compounds, most resistance genes can homologous to disease resistance loci, including one NBS- be classiWed into a few well-deWned groups (Nimchuk et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide Identification of Disease Resistance Genes (R Genes) in Wheat
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.18.210286; this version posted July 19, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Genome-wide Identification of Disease Resistance Genes (R Genes) in Wheat Ethan J. Andersen, UGLauren E. Lindsey, and Madhav P. Nepal* Department of Biology & Microbiology South Dakota State University Brookings, SD 57007 UG = Undergraduate Student; *Corresponding author contact: [email protected] ABSTRACT Proteins encoded by plant resistance genes (R genes) detect pathogenic effectors and initiate immune responses. Although R genes in many plant genomes are identified, they are yet to be identified in wheat. The major objectives of this project were to conduct genome-wide identification of the NB- ARC-encoding R genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and assess their genomic architecture and potential functional divergence. Wheat protein sequences were obtained from the Ensembl Genomes database, and genes were identified using interpro program. Chromosomal locations of the R genes were determined and syntenic analyses were performed. Altogether, 2151 wheat NB-ARC-encoding genes were identified, among which 1298 genes formed 547 gene clusters. Many of these gene clusters included highly similar genes likely formed by tandem duplications. Among the NB-ARC-encoding genes, 1552 (~72%) encode Leucine-Rich Repeats (LRRs), 802 are Coiled-Coil (CC) domain-encoding CC-NBS- LRR (CNL) genes and three are Resistance to Powdery mildew 8 (RPW8) domain-encoding RPW8-NBS- LRR (RNL) genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide Survey of Arabidopsis Natural Variation in Downy Mildew Resistance Using Combined Association and Linkage Mapping
    Genome-wide survey of Arabidopsis natural variation in downy mildew resistance using combined association and linkage mapping Adnane Nemria,1, Susanna Atwellb, Aaron M. Taroneb,2, Yu S. Huangb, Keyan Zhaob,3, David J. Studholmea, Magnus Nordborgb, and Jonathan D. G. Jonesa,4 aSainsbury Laboratory, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom; and bMolecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2910 Edited* by Detlef Weigel, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany, and approved April 23, 2010 (received for review November 13, 2009) The model plant Arabidopsis thaliana exhibits extensive natural var- RPP1, RPP2, RPP5, RPP7, RPP8, and RPP13 activate defense iation in resistance to parasites. Immunity is often conferred by re- that culminates in the hypersensitive response (HR) on percep- sistance (R) genes that permit recognition of specific races of a tion of the downy mildew parasite, Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis disease. The number of such R genes and their distribution are poorly ex parasitica (Hpa). Hpa is a highly specialized natural parasite of understood. In this study, we investigated the basis for resistance to At. All Hpa are virulent on some accessions, but At frequently the downy mildew agent Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis ex para- shows resistance (11, 17, 18). In A. thaliana, Hpa is the parasite sitica (Hpa) in a global sample of A. thaliana. We implemented a com- species for which the most R loci and genes have been identified, bined genome-wide mapping of resistance using populations of consistent with an important role of Hpa in At evolution (19). recombinant inbred lines and a collection of wild A.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance (R) Genes; a Natural Resource of Plant-Pathogen Resistance
    DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Resistance (R) genes; a natural resource of plant-pathogen resistance Iman Abbas Degree project for Bachelor of Science with a major in Biology BIO602 Biology; Degree project 15 Hec Second cycle Semester/year: Autumn 2018 Supervisor: Mats Andersson, Department of Biological and Environmental Science Examiner: Cornelia Spetea-Wiklund, Department of Biological and Environmental Science TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Sammanfattning ......................................................................................................................... 3 Forewords ................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 5 Plant immunity ........................................................................................................................ 5 R genes and R proteins ........................................................................................................... 6 Aim .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Material and methods ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Innate Immune Memory: an Evolutionary Perspective Benjamin Gourbal, Silvain Pinaud, Gerold Beckers, Jos Van Der Meer, Uwe Conrath, Mihai Netea
    Innate immune memory: An evolutionary perspective Benjamin Gourbal, Silvain Pinaud, Gerold Beckers, Jos van der Meer, Uwe Conrath, Mihai Netea To cite this version: Benjamin Gourbal, Silvain Pinaud, Gerold Beckers, Jos van der Meer, Uwe Conrath, et al.. Innate immune memory: An evolutionary perspective. Immunological Reviews, Wiley, 2018, Immunologic Memory, 283 (1), pp.21-40. 10.1111/imr.12647. hal-01792968 HAL Id: hal-01792968 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01792968 Submitted on 8 Feb 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Innate immune memory: An evolutionary perspective Benjamin Gourbal1, Silvain Pinaud1*, Gerold J. M. Beckers2, Jos W. M. Van Der Meer3, Uwe Conrath2, Mihai G. Netea3,4 1Interactions Hosts Pathogens Environments UMR 5244, University of Perpignan Via Domitia, CNRS, IFREMER, Univ. Montpellier, Perpignan, France 2 Department of Plant Physiology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany 3 Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands 4 Department for Genomics & Immunoregulation, Life and Medical Sciences Institute (LIMES), University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany *Present address Silvain Pinaud, Welcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK Corresponding authors Benjamin Gourbal, PhD, UMR5244 IHPE, Université de Perpignan, Perpignan, France.
    [Show full text]
  • From Player to Pawn: Viral Avirulence Factors Involved in Plant Immunity
    viruses Review From Player to Pawn: Viral Avirulence Factors Involved in Plant Immunity Changjun Huang Key Laboratory of Tobacco Biotechnological Breeding, National Tobacco Genetic Engineering Research Center, Yunnan Academy of Tobacco Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650021, China; [email protected]; Tel.: +86-877-2075024 Abstract: In the plant immune system, according to the ‘gene-for-gene’ model, a resistance (R) gene product in the plant specifically surveils a corresponding effector protein functioning as an avirulence (Avr) gene product. This system differs from other plant–pathogen interaction systems, in which plant R genes recognize a single type of gene or gene family because almost all virus genes with distinct structures and functions can also interact with R genes as Avr determinants. Thus, research conducted on viral Avr-R systems can provide a novel understanding of Avr and R gene product interactions and identify mechanisms that enable rapid co-evolution of plants and phytopathogens. In this review, we intend to provide a brief overview of virus-encoded proteins and their roles in triggering plant resistance, and we also summarize current progress in understanding plant resistance against virus Avr genes. Moreover, we present applications of Avr gene-mediated phenotyping in R gene identification and screening of segregating populations during breeding processes. Keywords: plant viruses; plant immunity; NB-LRR; avirulence gene; effector-triggered immunity (ETI); viral effectors Citation: Huang, C. From Player to Pawn: Viral Avirulence Factors 1. Introduction Involved in Plant Immunity. Viruses Plant viruses contain single-stranded or double-stranded RNA or DNA genomes and 2021, 13, 688. https://doi.org/ vary substantially in their genome structure and organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Linked Pairs of Arabidopsis TNL Resistance Genes Independently Confer Recognition of Bacterial Effector Avrrps4
    ARTICLE Received 4 Sep 2014 | Accepted 20 Jan 2015 | Published 6 Mar 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7338 Two linked pairs of Arabidopsis TNL resistance genes independently confer recognition of bacterial effector AvrRps4 Simon B. Saucet1,*, Yan Ma1,*, Panagiotis F. Sarris1, Oliver J. Furzer1, Kee Hoon Sohn2 & Jonathan D.G. Jones1 Plant immunity requires recognition of pathogen effectors by intracellular NB-LRR immune receptors encoded by Resistance (R) genes. Most R proteins recognize a specific effector, but some function in pairs that recognize multiple effectors. Arabidopsis thaliana TIR-NB-LRR proteins RRS1-R and RPS4 together recognize two bacterial effectors, AvrRps4 from Pseudomonas syringae and PopP2 from Ralstonia solanacearum. However, AvrRps4, but not PopP2, is recognized in rrs1/rps4 mutants. We reveal an R gene pair that resembles and is linked to RRS1/RPS4, designated as RRS1B/RPS4B, which confers recognition of AvrRps4 but not PopP2. Like RRS1/RPS4, RRS1B/RPS4B proteins associate and activate defence genes upon AvrRps4 recognition. Inappropriate combinations (RRS1/RPS4B or RRS1B/RPS4) are non-functional and this specificity is not TIR domain dependent. Distinct putative orthologues of both pairs are maintained in the genomes of Arabidopsis thaliana relatives and are likely derived from a common ancestor pair. Our results provide novel insights into paired R gene function and evolution. 1 Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK. 2 Bioprotection Research Centre, Institute of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. * These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.D.G.J.
    [Show full text]