Policy Legacies and the Politics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Policy Legacies and the Politics POLICY LEGACIES AND THE POLITICS OF LABOUR IMMIGRATION SELECTION AND CONTROL: THE PROCESSES AND DYNAMICS SHAPING NATIONAL-LEVEL POLICY DECISIONS DURING THE RECENT WAVE OF INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION CHRISTOPHER FREDERICK WRIGHT DEPARTMENT OF POLITICS AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES AND DARWIN COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE THIS DISSERTATION IS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SEPTEMBER 2010 DECLARATION This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration, except where specifically indicated in the text. This dissertation does not exceed 80,000 words, as specified by the Degree Committee. Christopher Wright 15 September 2010 ii ABSTRACT Policy legacies and the politics of labour immigration selection and control: The processes and dynamics shaping national-level policy decisions during the recent wave of international migration Christopher Frederick Wright The two decades preceding the global financial crisis of 2008 saw an increase in international migration flows. This development was accompanied by the relaxation of immigration entry controls for select categories of foreign workers across the developed world. The scale of labour immigration, and the categories of foreign workers granted entry, varied considerably across states. To some extent, these developments transcended the traditional classifications of comparative immigration politics. This thesis examines the reform process in two states with contrasting policy legacies that adopted liberal labour immigration selection and control policies during the abovementioned period. The instrumental role that immigration has played in the process of nation-building in Australia has led it to be classified as a ‘traditional destination state’ with a positive immigration policy legacy. By contrast, immigration has not been significant in the formation of national identity in the United Kingdom. It has a more negative immigration policy legacy and is generally regarded as a ‘reluctant state’. Examining the reasons for liberal shifts in labour immigration policy in two states with different immigration politics allows insights to be gained into the processes of policy-making and the dynamics that underpin it. In Australia, labour immigration controls were relaxed incrementally and through a deliberative process. Reform was justified on the grounds that it fulfilled economic needs and objectives, and was consistent with an accepted definition of the national interest. In the UK, liberal shifts in labour immigration policy were the incidental consequence of the pursuit of objectives in other policy areas. Reform was implemented unilaterally, and in an uncoordinated manner characterised by an absence of consultation. The contrast in the manner in which reform was managed by the various actors, institutions and stakeholders involved in the process both reflected, and served to reinforce, the immigration policy legacies of the two states. Moreover, the Howard government used Australia’s positive legacy to construct a coherent narrative to justify the implementation of liberal reform. This generated greater immediate and lasting support for its reforms among stakeholders and the broader community. By contrast, lacking a similarly positive legacy, the Blair government in the UK found it difficult to create such a narrative, which contributed to the unpopularity of its reforms. This thesis therefore argues that policy legacies had a significant impact on the processes and dynamics that shaped labour immigration selection and control decisions during the recent wave of international migration. The cases demonstrate that a nation’s past immigration policy experiences shape its policy-making structures, as well as institutional and stakeholder policy preferences, which are core constituent components of a nation’s immigration politics. The UK case shows that even when reluctant states implement liberal labour immigration policies, these characteristics tend to create feedback effects that make it difficult for reform to be durable. The relationship between immigration policy and politics thus becomes self- reinforcing. But this does not necessarily mean that states’ immigration politics are rigid, since the institutions that help to make a nation’s immigration policy and shape its politics will inevitably undergo a process of adaptation in response to changing contexts. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis could not have been written without the support of a number of people. It has been both a pleasure and a privilege to study under my two supervisors, Professor Willy Brown and Dr Helen Thompson. They have provided valuable academic direction over the past four years, for which I am most grateful. Professor Brown and Dr Thompson have been wonderful sources of wisdom, encouragement and assistance, and I have learned much from them both. My thanks go to all of the people that agreed to be interviewed for generously offering their time and insights. I am obliged to James Jupp, John Nieuwenhuysen, Bob Birrell, Randall Hansen and Sarah Spencer for providing helpful advice when I was conducting fieldwork for the two case studies. The Political Science Program of the Research School of Social Sciences at the Australian National University kindly gave me a base from which conduct my research in Australia. The Cambridge Commonwealth Trust, the Cambridge Political Economy Society Trust, the Board of Graduate Studies, the Smuts Memorial Fund and Darwin College all contributed the funding that allowed me to undertake this doctorate, which has been immensely appreciated. The support, humour and tolerance of many friends and family members over the past four years has been invaluable. Special mention goes to Tomas Undurraga, Colm McLaughlin, Jenny Kaldor and Christian Downie, all of whom spent countless hours editing and proof reading substantial sections of this thesis – a big thanks to you all. Thank you to my parents, Lance and Ros, for the untold amount of encouragement and inspiration they have given over the past four years (and, of course, the preceding 25), and also for proof-reading various chapters. Finally, I truly could not have written this thesis without my partner Rosina, who has been there for me throughout the entire process – from accompanying me halfway across the world to undertake this degree, to providing vital encouragement in the final stretches of writing-up (as well offering her supreme editing skills) – words cannot express the depth of my gratitude. iv CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................................iii! Acknowledgements ..............................................................................................................iv! List of figures ........................................................................................................................vi! List of acronyms..................................................................................................................viii Section I Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1 The recent wave of international migration and the labour immigration selection and control policies of developed states......................... 2! Chapter 2 A review of the literature on the politics of labour immigration selection and control......................................................................................... 30 Section II Australia ...................................................................................................... 46! Chapter 3 The politics of Australian labour immigration policy prior to 1996 ................ 47! Chapter 4 The liberalisation of Australian labour immigration policy, 1996-2007.......... 69! Chapter 5 The structural and institutional dynamics of Australian policy change ........... 97! Section III The United Kingdom................................................................................. 136! Chapter 6 The politics of UK labour immigration policy prior to 1997 ......................... 137! Chapter 7 The liberalisation of UK labour immigration policy, 2000-2004................... 155! Chapter 8 The structural and institutional dynamics of UK policy change .................... 179! Section IV Conclusion................................................................................................. 212! Chapter 9 The impact of policy legacies on the processes and dynamics of labour immigration selection and control .................................................. 213! Appendix A Interviewees – Australian case study.......................................................... 238! Appendix B Interviewees – United Kingdom case study ............................................... 241! References .......................................................................................................................... 244! v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1! Inflows of foreign workers into various OECD states, 1995 to 2007 (selected years) ................................................................................................... 7! Figure 3.1! Overseas-born population from regions of Europe in Australia, 1947, 1961 and 1971 ........................................................................................ 55! Figure 3.2! Annual permanent immigration programme intakes, major categories and sub-categories,
Recommended publications
  • Banged up August 2008 for the Term ‘Banged REFORM Up’ in the Previous Three Months
    and by humanising both the young The media and reform: offenders and their adult mentors. Using LexisNexis, a search was made of UK newspapers on 14 the case of Banged Up August 2008 for the term ‘banged REFORM up’ in the previous three months. David Wilson discusses the reform potential This yielded 42 stories over 24 newspapers in which the programme of popular media, focusing on the TV series was mentioned. This mention might PENAL Banged Up. have been as brief as the programme being cited as evidence of Channel 5’s commitment to new programmes to over 2,000 words of interview ORING with David Blunkett. n my previous writing I have prisoner’s story and measuring their As might be expected the suggested that popular, progress within the series. The Rt majority of mentions were in TV EXPL Imainstream TV and fi lms about Hon David Blunkett MP, the former previews (20) and reviews (8) and prisons can serve a penal reform Home Secretary (2001-2004) was clearly the majority of other articles/ function through, for example, recruited to chair the parole board profiles had been sparked by the helping to set standards of decency hearings. Throughout the programme series or publicity for it. The setting for what is and what is not makers not only wanted to entertain of Scarborough’s former jail ensured acceptable practice in prison, and viewers with this piece of ‘reality some coverage by local papers (four representing prisoners as people in TV’, but also have the young mentions in Scarborough Evening an attempt to counter processes of prisoners experience what prison News) as did the participation of ex- depersonalisation and de- was like in the belief that this could offenders (Birmingham Evening humanisation (Wilson and change their future behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • A Surveillance Society?
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee A Surveillance Society? Fifth Report of Session 2007–08 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 20 May 2008 HC 58-II [Incorporating HC 508-i–iv, Session 2006–07] Published on 8 June 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £24.50 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chairman) Tom Brake MP (Liberal Democrat, Charshalton and Wallington) Ms Karen Buck MP (Labour, Regent’s Park and Kensington North) Mr James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) David TC Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) Mrs Janet Dean MP (Labour, Burton) Patrick Mercer MP (Conservative, Newark) Margaret Moran MP (Labour, Luton South) Gwyn Prosser MP (Labour, Dover) Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Martin Salter MP (Labour, Reading West) Mr Gary Streeter MP (Conservative, South West Devon) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the inquiry: Rt Hon John Denham MP (Labour, Southampton Itchen) Mr Jeremy Browne MP (Liberal Democrat, Taunton) Mr Richard Benyon MP (Conservative, Newbury) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Not Go Back to 70S Primary Education Wikio
    This site uses cookies to help deliver services. By using this site, you agree to the use of cookies. Learn more Got it Conor's Commentary A blog about politics, education, Ireland, culture and travel. I am Conor Ryan, Dublin-born former adviser to Tony Blair and David Blunkett on education. Views expressed on this blog are written in a personal capacity. Friday, 20 February 2009 SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE UPDATES Let's not go back to 70s primary education Wikio Despite the Today programme's insistence on the term, "independent" is certainly not an apt Contact me description of today's report from the self-styled 'largest' review of primary education in 40 years. It You can email me here. is another deeply ideological strike against standards and effective teaching of the 3Rs in our primary schools. Many of its contributors oppose the very idea of school 'standards' and have an ideological opposition to external testing. They have been permanent critics of the changes of recent decades. And it is only in that light that the review's conclusions can be understood. Of course, there is no conflict between teaching literacy and numeracy, and the other subjects within the primary curriculum. And the best schools do indeed show how doing them all well provides a good and rounded education. Presenting this as the point of difference is a diversionary Aunt Sally. However, there is a very real conflict between recognising the need to single literacy and numeracy out for extra time over the other subjects as with the dedicated literacy and numeracy lessons, and making them just another aspect of primary schooling that pupils may or may not pick up along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Reshuffle – 5 June 2009 8 June 2009
    Ministerial Reshuffle – 5 June 2009 8 June 2009 This note provides details of the Cabinet and Ministerial reshuffle carried out by the Prime Minister on 5 June following the resignation of a number of Cabinet members and other Ministers over the previous few days. In the new Cabinet, John Denham succeeds Hazel Blears as Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and John Healey becomes Housing Minister – attending Cabinet - following Margaret Beckett’s departure. Other key Cabinet positions with responsibility for issues affecting housing remain largely unchanged. Alistair Darling stays as Chancellor of the Exchequer and Lord Mandelson at Business with increased responsibilities, while Ed Miliband continues at the Department for Energy and Climate Change and Hilary Benn at Defra. Yvette Cooper has, however, moved to become the new Secretary of State for Work and Pensions with Liam Byrne becoming Chief Secretary to the Treasury. The Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills has been merged with BERR to create a new Department for Business, Innovation and Skills under Lord Mandelson. As an existing CLG Minister, John Healey will be familiar with a number of the issues affecting the industry. He has been involved with last year’s Planning Act, including discussions on the Community Infrastructure Levy, and changes to future arrangements for the adoption of Regional Spatial Strategies. HBF will be seeking an early meeting with the new Housing Minister. A full list of the new Cabinet and other changes is set out below. There may yet be further changes in junior ministerial positions and we will let you know of any that bear on matters of interest to the industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Hizb Ut-Tahrir Ideology and Strategy
    HIZB UT-TAHRIR IDEOLOGY AND STRATEGY “The fierce struggle… between the Muslims and the Kuffar, has been intense ever since the dawn of Islam... It will continue in this way – a bloody struggle alongside the intellectual struggle – until the Hour comes and Allah inherits the Earth...” Hizb ut-Tahrir The Centre for Social Cohesion Houriya Ahmed & Hannah Stuart HIZB UT-TAHRIR IDEOLOGY AND STRATEGY “The fierce struggle… between the Muslims and the Kuffar, has been intense ever since the dawn of Islam... It will continue in this way – a bloody struggle alongside the intellectual struggle – until the Hour comes and Allah inherits the Earth...” Hizb ut-Tahrir The Centre for Social Cohesion Houriya Ahmed & Hannah Stuart Hizb ut-Tahrir Ideology and Strategy Houriya Ahmed and Hannah Stuart 2009 The Centre for Social Cohesion Clutha House, 10 Storey’s Gate London SW1P 3AY Tel: +44 (0)20 7222 8909 Fax: +44 (0)5 601527476 Email: [email protected] www.socialcohesion.co.uk The Centre for Social Cohesion Limited by guarantee Registered in England and Wales: No. 06609071 © The Centre for Social Cohesion, November 2009 All the Institute’s publications seek to further its objective of promoting human rights for the benefit of the public. The views expressed are those of the author, not of the Institute. Hizb ut-Tahrir: Ideology and Strategy By Houriya Ahmed and Hannah Stuart ISBN 978-0-9560013-4-4 All rights reserved The map on the front cover depicts Hizb ut-Tahrir’s vision for its Caliphate in ‘Islamic Lands’ ABOUT THE AUTHORS Houriya Ahmed is a Research Fellow at the Centre for Social Cohesion (CSC).
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Forum Pod the Auspolicy Issue – What the Country Voted for Episode 110 24 May 2019
    POLICY FORUM POD Policy Forum Pod The Auspolicy issue – what the country voted for Episode 110 24 May 2019 Connect with us: www.policyforum.net policyforumpod.simplecast.fm [email protected] @APPSPolicyForum Asia and the Pacific Policy Society About us: Policy Forum Pod is the podcast of Policy Forum.net - Asia and the Pacific's platform for public policy debate, analysis and discussion. Policy Forum is based at Crawford School of Public Policy at the Australian National University. Our regular podcasts are written for a broad audience of public policy professionals, and those interested in public policy throughout the region. Policy Forum connects with the Asia and the Pacific Policy Society – a network of thousands of people involved in every level of policy around the region. Transcription: The_Auspolicy_issue_What_the_country_voted_for_3_tc Duration: 01:03:26 Host: Julia Ahrens Bob Cotton: co-host 1; Bob Cotton, Visiting Fellow at Crawford School, ANU Prof Grafton: co-host 2, Professor R. Quentin Grafton, Director, Centre for Water Economics, Environment & Policy, ANU College of Asia & The Pacific. Assoc. Prof Burke: Assoc. Professor Paul Burke, Crawford School, ANU Prof McKibbin: Professor Warwick McKibbin, Director of the Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis in the ANU Crawford School of Public Policy Dr Hewson: Dr John Hewson, Chair of the Tax and Transfer Policy Institute Dr Allen: Dr Liz Allen, Demographer, Postdoctoral Fellow, ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences [intro music 0:00:00-0:00:11] Host: Welcome to Policy Forum Pod, the podcast for those who want to dig a little deeper into the policy challenges facing Australia and its region.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour's Last Fling on Constitutional Reform
    | THE CONSTITUTION UNIT NEWSLETTER | ISSUE 43 | SEPTEMBER 2009 | MONITOR LABOUR’S LAST FLING ON CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN THIS ISSUE Gordon Brown’s bold plans for constitutional constitutional settlement …We will work with the reform continue to be dogged by bad luck and bad British people to deliver a radical programme of PARLIAMENT 2 - 3 judgement. The bad luck came in May, when the democratic and constitutional reform”. MPs’ expenses scandal engulfed Parliament and government and dominated the headlines for a Such rhetoric also defies political reality. There is EXECUTIVE 3 month. The bad judgement came in over-reacting a strict limit on what the government can deliver to the scandal, promising wide ranging reforms before the next election. The 2009-10 legislative which have nothing to do with the original mischief, session will be at most six months long. There PARTIES AND ELECTIONS 3-4 and which have limited hope of being delivered in is a risk that even the modest proposals in the the remainder of this Parliament. Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill will not pass. It was not introduced until 20 July, DEVOLUTION 4-5 The MPs’ expenses scandal broke on 8 May. As the day before the House rose for the summer the Daily Telegraph published fresh disclosures recess. After a year’s delay, the only significant day after day for the next 25 days public anger additions are Part 3 of the bill, with the next small HUMAN RIGHTS 5 mounted. It was not enough that the whole steps on Lords reform (see page 2); and Part 7, to issue of MPs’ allowances was already being strengthen the governance of the National Audit investigated by the Committee on Standards in Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Parliaments and Young People's Participation in Politics
    Youth Parliaments and young people’s participation in politics Standard Note: SNPC-00823 Last updated: 24 January 2007 Author: Paul Lester, Miranda Olivier Wright, Parliament and Constitution Centre; Nicola Harland, Parliamentary Education Unit Many organisations, including the UK Youth Parliament, use “parliament” as a convenient word to describe some form of discussion forum or council. This note gives details about some of the main organisations involved with organising youth parliaments and other initiatives to increase youth participation in the political process. Contents A. Parliamentary Education Unit Pupil Parliaments 2 B. UK Youth Parliament 2 C. Scottish Parliament 3 D. Scottish Youth Parliament 4 E. Citizenship Foundation National Youth Parliament Competition 4 F. Children’s Parliament 5 G. Scottish Youth Summit 5 H. Funky Dragon 5 I. Northern Ireland Youth Forum 6 J. European Youth Parliament 6 K. Youth Parliaments elsewhere 7 L. Yvote?/Ynot? 7 M. The Electoral Commission 8 Appendix 1 – Parliamentary Education Unit: Pupil Parliaments 10 Appendix 2 – UK Youth Parliament – Contact Information 17 Appendix 3 – Youth Parliament websites 18 Standard Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise others. A. Parliamentary Education Unit Pupil Parliaments The Parliamentary Education Unit, which provides an educational service for both UK Houses of Parliament, instituted in 1999 a series of Pupil Parliaments. These allow children of different age groups to participate in a debate in the Palace of Westminster on several days each year. Debates take place in one of the Grand Committee Rooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Tony Mcnulty
    House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Mr Tony McNulty Tenth Report of Session 2008–09 Report and Appendices, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 27 October 2009 HC 1070 Published on 29 October 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Committee on Standards and Privileges The Committee on Standards and Privileges is appointed by the House of Commons to oversee the work of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards; to examine the arrangements proposed by the Commissioner for the compilation, maintenance and accessibility of the Register of Members’ Interests and any other registers of interest established by the House; to review from time to time the form and content of those registers; to consider any specific complaints made in relation to the registering or declaring of interests referred to it by the Commissioner; to consider any matter relating to the conduct of Members, including specific complaints in relation to alleged breaches in the Code of Conduct which have been drawn to the Committee’s attention by the Commissioner; and to recommend any modifications to the Code of Conduct as may from time to time appear to be necessary. Current membership Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) (Chairman) Rt Hon Kevin Barron MP (Labour, Rother Valley) Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) Nick Harvey MP (Liberal Democrat, North Devon) Rt Hon Greg Knight MP (Conservative, East Yorkshire) Mr Elfyn Llwyd MP (Plaid Cymru, Meirionnydd Nant Conwy) Mr Chris Mullin MP (Labour, Sunderland South) The Hon Nicholas Soames MP (Conservative, Mid Sussex) Mr Paddy Tipping MP (Labour, Sherwood) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Powers The constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in Standing Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • A PRESUMPTION AGAINST IMPRISONMENT Social Order and Social Values
    July 2014 A PRESUMPTION AGAINST IMPRISONMENT Social Order and Social Values A Presumption Against Imprisonment Social Order and Social Values July 2014 THE BRITISH ACADEMY 10 –11 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AH www.britishacademy.ac.uk Registered Charity: Number 233176 © The British Academy 2014 Published July 2014 ISBN 978-0-85672-615-6 Designed by Soapbox, www.soapbox.co.uk Printed by Kube 3 Contents Acknowledgements 4 The Authors 5 Foreword by the Rt Hon. the Lord Woolf 9 Executive Summary 15 Introduction 21 Part I: Where We Are Now and How We Got Here 26 Part II: Why Our Imprisonment Policies Should Change 52 Part III: Strategies for Reducing the Prison Population 86 Annex: Key Events and Documents 106 4 A Presumption Against Imprisonment // British Academy Acknowledgements This Report has been produced under the aegis of the British Academy’s programme of public policy activities. Written by members of a steering group set up by the Academy, those with authorial responsibility for the various parts of the Report are Rob Allen, Andrew Ashworth, Roger Cotterrell, Andrew Coyle, Antony Duff, Nicola Lacey, Alison Liebling and Rod Morgan. Other members of the steering group, who offered helpful advice at various stages in the production of the Report, were Tony Bot- toms, Brenda Hale and Paul Rock. As a serving judge, Brenda Hale takes no view on the opinions expressed in the Report. The Foreword was written by the Rt Hon. Lord Woolf; and the Report was edited and the Executive Summary written by Les Newby and Nicky Denison, independent consultants and writers on society, economy and the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Working Paper
    WORKING PAPER A Shock To !e System: Journalism, Government and the Freedom of Information Act 2000 Jeremy Hayes May 2009 FOREWORD: The Freedom of Information Act 2000 has changed journalism in Britain. Four years after it was introduced the flow of news stories relying in whole or in part on information gained through a request to a government department, agency or statutory body has become continual. Although government ministers insist that the Act was not created for the benefit of journalism, there is no doubt that for a number of journalists the Act has altered the way they work and their expectation about the information they can gather through it. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the way in which the Act is being applied by officials and the uses to which it is being put by journalists. I have carried this out at a time when the stakes over the future definition of public interest as it applies to FOI have never been higher. 2009 may prove to be a decisive year for the Act through the rulings of the Information Tribunal and the responses evoked in government, and as the scope of the Act as it applies to organisations working in the public sector, including central government, is redefined. I have been greatly assisted by the willingness of many partners in FOI – journalists, campaigners, officials and politicians – to share their experiences and insights with me. Because of the limit of time available to me I have not been able to consider the implementation of the Freedom of Information Act (Scotland) 2002 in any detail.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissident Liberal—A Principled Political Career
    INTRODUCTION: A DISSIDENT LIBERAL—A PRINCIPLED POLITICAL CAREER John Wanna and Marija Taflaga Introducing Peter Baume’s Political Writings and Selected Speeches (including his unpublished diaries) Peter Erne Baume MD, AC, served in the Australian Senate from August 1974 until January 1991, representing the people of New South Wales as one of their initially 10 and then 12 senators. As a member of the Liberal Party, Baume was a dissident liberal, very much his own man, who often baulked at toeing the party line, and was not afraid of crossing the floor against his party colleagues. He was a highbrow classical intellectual of Jewish faith with professional training in medicine. He tended not to suffer fools gladly but equally was not elitist or aloof in his interactions with others and could be tolerant and empathetic in his demeanour. Like Max Weber, he regarded politics as a vocation, a special calling for those committed to serving the public interest throughout their lives;1 and yet when he came to serve in the legislature and experienced the rough and tumble of political life he often despaired at the lack of principles, vision or even basic understanding of many of his party colleagues. He resented other politicians who ostensibly posed as leaders of the community yet who adopted positions on public policy based on next to no information and were simply prejudicial in making their minds up on issues of national importance (at one time referring 1 See Baume (2000); and his speech later in this volume entitled ‘Four Careers’. xiii A Dissident LIBERAL to them as the ‘fat arses’ of the political system).
    [Show full text]