DOCSLIB.ORG

The Identity Project : an Assessment of the UK Identity Cards Bill and It's Implications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Identity Project : an Assessment of the UK Identity Cards Bill and It's Implications LSE Research Online Report The identity project : an assessment of the UK Identity Cards Bill and it's implications Research coordinators : Simon Davies, Ian Hosein & Edgar A. Whitley LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. You may cite this version as: Davies, Simon; Hosein, Ian & Whitley, Edgar A. (2005). The identity project : an assessment of the UK Identity Cards Bill and it's implications [online]. London: LSE Research Online. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/archive/00000684 This is a copy of a report produced for the Identity Project by the Department of Information Systems © 2005 London School of Economics and Political Science Original available at http://is2.lse.ac.uk/IDcard/default.htm http://eprints.lse.ac.uk Contact LSE Research Online at: [email protected] The Identity Project an assessment of the UK Identity Cards Bill and its implications The Identity Project An assessment of the UK Identity Cards Bill and its implications Project Management by Hosted and Published by Version 1.09, June 27, 2005 The LSE Identity Project Report: June 2005 i Credits Advisory Group Professor Ian Angell, Convenor of the Department of Information Systems, LSE Professor Christine Chinkin, Law Department, LSE Professor Frank Cowell, Economics Department, LSE Professor Keith Dowding, Government Department, LSE Professor Patrick Dunleavy, Government Department, LSE Professor George Gaskell, Director, Methodology Institute, LSE Professor Christopher Greenwood QC, Convenor of the Law Department, LSE Professor Christopher Hood, Centre for Analysis of Risk & Regulation, LSE Professor Mary Kaldor, Centre for the Study of Global Governance, LSE Professor Frank Land, Department of Information Systems, LSE Professor Robin Mansell, Department of Media & Communications, LSE Professor Tim Newburn, Social Policy Department, LSE Professor David Piachaud, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE Professor Robert Reiner, Law Department, LSE ii The LSE Identity Project Report: June 2005 Research Group, Contributors, Advisors and Reviewers Research coordinator: Dr Edgar Whitley, Reader in Information Systems. Professor Ross Anderson, Cambridge Rikke Frank Jorgensen, Denmark Adrian Beck, University of Leicester Jeegar Kakkad Ralf Bendrath, University of Bremen Philippe Martin, Kable Krista Boa, University of Toronto Meryem Marzouki, France Nicholas Bohm Ariosto Matus-Perez Daniel Boos, Switzerland Dr Eileen Munro, LSE Dr Stefan Brands, McGill University Sjoera Nas, The Netherlands Dr Ian Brown Dr Peter Neumann, SRI International Tony Bunyan, Statewatch Professor Toshimaru Ogura Dr Nadia Caidi, University of Toronto Joe Organ, Oxford Internet Institute Marco A. Calamari, Italy Nicholas Pauro Shami Chakrabarti, Liberty Daniele Pica, LSE Professor Roger Clarke, Australia Dr Chris Pounder, Pinsent Masons Professor Andrew Clement, Canada Professor Angela Sasse, UCL Dan Cooper, Covington and Burling Bruce Schneier, Counterpane Systems Mike Cushman, LSE Dr Susan Scott, LSE Ian Dowty Dr Barbara Simons Terri Dowty Dr Steve Smithson, LSE Mark Dzięcielewski Nina Somera, Philippines Alberto Escudero-Pascual, Sweden Jay Stanley, ACLU Joseph Ferenbok, University of Toronto Barry Steinhardt, ACLU Federico Ferretti, University of Leeds Toby Stevens, Enterprise Privacy Group Jens Franz, SOAS Peter Szyszko, Covington and Burling Teresa Hackett, Ireland Gohsuke Takama, Japan Kathrin Gerst, Germany Sarah Thatcher, LSE Marc Gilman Prodromos Tsiavos, LSE Dr Brian Gladman Rosemary Walsh Andrea Glorioso, Italy Jeremy Wickins, University of Sheffield. Wendy Grossman Johan Wilhelmsson, Swedish Ministry of William Heath, Kable Justice Derek Wong Project Mentors: Simon Davies and Dr Gus Hosein The LSE Identity Project Report: June 2005 iii Acknowledgements The LSE would like to thank the Department of Information Systems for hosting and publishing this study. Our gratitude also goes to the research team who have worked tirelessly and under severe time constraints, and to the Advisory Board, who have supported the work from its inception. Thanks also to the Enterprise Privacy Group for undertaking the management and coordination of the project. We would also like to express our appreciation to the many people and organisations that contributed to this study, and especially to the organisations that participated in the expert roundtables. Thanks also to William Heath and Philippe Martin of Kable, who supplied the costings framework that formed the basis of our estimates. Participation in the project by an individual or organisation does not imply agreement with the findings of the study in part or full. Finally we would like to thank the LSE Reprographics Unit, the Design Unit, and the LSE Press Office for support above and beyond the call of duty. The LSE Identity Project Report: June 2005 v Outline FOREWORD..................................................................................................................................................1 PREFACE.......................................................................................................................................................3 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS...............................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................7 CONCLUSIONS IN DETAIL......................................................................................................................9 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS REPORT ...........................................................................................15 OVERVIEW OF THE LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS ..........................................................................21 THE GOVERNMENT’S CONSULTATION PROCESS.......................................................................31 NATIONAL SECURITY, ORGANISED CRIME AND TERRORISM ..............................................43 INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENT AND OBLIGATIONS.............................................................45 IDENTITY FRAUD.....................................................................................................................................97 POLICING AND ID..................................................................................................................................113 RACE, DISCRIMINATION, IMMIGRATION AND POLICING.....................................................125 THE ENVIRONMENT OF PUBLIC TRUST .......................................................................................139 THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT..............................................................................................................145 BIOMETRICS ...........................................................................................................................................169 SECURITY, SAFETY AND THE NATIONAL IDENTITY REGISTER .........................................187 THE IT ENVIRONMENT IN THE UK .................................................................................................201 COST ASSUMPTIONS – COSTING THE GOVERNMENT’S PROPOSALS................................225 COST PROJECTIONS.............................................................................................................................241 DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND OPTIONS................................................................................................247 AN ALTERNATIVE BLUEPRINT FOR A NATIONAL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM ..............275 APPENDIX 1: COMPARISON WITH THE HAC FINDINGS .........................................................285 APPENDIX 2: COST PROJECTIONS .................................................................................................301 The LSE Identity Project Report: June 2005 vii Table of Contents FOREWORD..................................................................................................................................................1 PREFACE.......................................................................................................................................................3 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS...............................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................7 CONCLUSIONS IN DETAIL......................................................................................................................9 Overview.................................................................................................................................................9 Purposes of the system.........................................................................................................................10 The technological environment............................................................................................................10
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Opposition-Craft': an Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitte
    ‘Opposition-Craft’: An Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds, School of Politics and International Studies May, 2020 1 Intellectual Property and Publications Statements The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ©2020 The University of Leeds and Edward Henry Lack The right of Edward Henry Lack to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 2 Acknowledgements Page I would like to thank Dr Victoria Honeyman and Dr Timothy Heppell of the School of Politics and International Studies, The University of Leeds, for their support and guidance in the production of this work. I would also like to thank my partner, Dr Ben Ramm and my parents, David and Linden Lack, for their encouragement and belief in my efforts to undertake this project. Finally, I would like to acknowledge those who took part in the research for this PhD thesis: Lord David Steel, Lord David Owen, Lord Chris Smith, Lord Andrew Adonis, Lord David Blunkett and Dame Caroline Spelman. 3 Abstract This thesis offers a distinctive and innovative framework for the study of effective official opposition politics in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • An Update on the UK Coalition Government's
    Statewatch Analysis Six months on: An update on the UK coalition government’s commitment to civil liberties Max Rowlands Contents Part I Introduction Part II The proposed measures 1. The Freedom (Great Repeal) Bill 2. Identity cards, the National Identity Register and the ContactPoint database 3. Fingerprinting in schools 4. The Freedom of Information Act 5. The DNA database 6. The right to trial by jury 7. The right to protest 8. Libel laws 9. The misuse of anti-terrorism legislation 10. The regulation of CCTV 11. The retention of communications data 12. The proliferation of unnecessary criminal offences 13. The Human Rights Act Part III What other reforms are needed? 14. The “database state” 15. The Digital Economy Act 16. Anti-social behaviour legislation 17. Anti-terrorism legislation Part IV Conclusion 1 Part I: Introduction Within weeks of its formation in May 2010, the coalition government announced with much fanfare its intention “to restore the rights of individuals in the face of encroaching state power.” An easy victory over Labour’s politically bankrupt National Identity Scheme followed, but since then the government’s approach has been characterised by caution and pragmatism rather than an unerring commitment to liberty. This is largely because there are splits within government on many of the key civil liberties issues that fundamentally define the relationship between citizen and state: how long and under what conditions can the government detain us, to what extent should the state surveil us, and what data on us should it hold? These internal divisions have been compounded by significant pressure from the civil service and security agencies to retain Labour policies that served to empower them.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Identification Number Reference Guide
    Tax Identification Number (TIN). Reference Guide. The following are examples of TINs from some of the countries where our customers may have foreign tax residency. China India TIN on Certificate of Tax Registration Permanent Account TIN on Business Licence Number (PAN) (Credibility Code) TIN on Identification Card United Kingdom New Zealand Unique Taxpayer Reference Inland Revenue Number (UTR) Department Number (IRD) National Insurance Number (NINO) Korea Brazil MINISTERIO´ DA FAZENDA Resident Registration Secretaria da Receita Federal Number (RRN) Cadastro CPFde Pessoas F’sicas Numero de Inscri ‹o Cadastro de Pessoas 000.000.000-00 JUAN FAZENDA Nome 12.345.888/8888-24 Fisicas (CPF) NOME DA PESSOA Nascimento 01/01/1990 Cadastro Nacional da Pessoa Juridica (CNPJ) Phillipines REPUBLI C OF TH E P HILIPPINE S Malaysia DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE TIN Tax Payer 456-888-888-00000 DIREKTORAT JENDERAL PAJAK CRUZ, BAYANI Identification Number 10 REYES COMPOUND KALAYAAN SUBDIVISION, MUNTINLUPA CITY Nombor Cukai NPWP : 27.938.653.5-024.00 0 BIRTHDA TE ISSUE DATE Pendapatan (NPWP) RAHMAN EK A PUTR A 03/08/1981 1/27/1999 JL.KELAP A DUA NO. 18 RT.006/00 6 KELAP A DUA - KEBON JERU K JAKA RTA BAR AT 911550 ) TGL TERDAFT AH 06-10-200 5 Tax Identification Number (TIN). Reference Guide. The following are examples of TINs from some of the countries where our customers may have foreign tax residency. Canada USA Social Insurance Number (SIN) Social Security Number Business Number (BN) Indonesia Pakistan KEMENTERIAN KEUANGAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA DIREKTORAT JENDERAL PAJAK KEMENTERIAN KEUANGAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA National Tax NPWP : 31.806.502.6-422.000DIREKTORAT JENDERAL PAJAK NPWP : 31.806.502.6-422.000 Number (NTN) NAMA NAM: AMAHY: MAHYADI PANGGABEAN PANGGABEAN Nomor Pokok Wajib NIK : - NIK ALAM: AT- : JL.TERUSAN PASIRKOJA BELAKANG NO.130 RT 006 RW 001 Pajak (NPWP) JAMIKA-BOJONG LOA KALER BANDUNG ALAMAT KPP: JL.TERUSAN: 422 PASIRKOJA BELAKANG NO.130 RT 006 RW 001 JAMIKA-BOJONG LOA KALER BANDUNG KPP : 422 Singapore South Africa REPUBLIC OF SINGAPO RE IDENTITY CARD NO .
    [Show full text]
  • 42Genno44.Pdf
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection CBP Decisions [USCBP 2007–0061; CBP Dec. No. 08–26] RIN 1651–AA69 8 CFR Parts 212 and 235 DEPARTMENT OF STATE 22 CFR Parts 41 and 53 Documents Required for Travelers Departing From or Arriving in the United States at Sea and Land Ports-of-Entry From Within the Western Hemisphere AGENCIES: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security; Bureau of Consular Affairs, Department of State. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This rule finalizes the second phase of a joint Depart- ment of Homeland Security and Department of State plan, known as the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative, to implement new docu- mentation requirements for U.S. citizens and certain nonimmigrant aliens entering the United States. This final rule details the docu- ments U.S. citizens1 and nonimmigrant citizens of Canada, Ber- muda, and Mexico will be required to present when entering the United States from within the Western Hemisphere at sea and land ports-of-entry. DATES: This final rule is effective on June 1, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Department of Homeland Security: Colleen Manaher, WHTI, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 1 ‘‘U.S. citizens’’ as used in this rule refers to both U.S. citizens and U.S. non-citizen na- tionals. 1 2 CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 42, NO. 44, OCTOBER 23, 2008 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 5.4–D, Washington, DC 20229, telephone number (202) 344–1220. Department of State: Consuelo Pachon, Office of Passport Policy, Planning and Advisory Services, Bureau of Consular Affairs, tele- phone number (202) 663–2662.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Guaranteeing the Rights of EU Nationals Isn't Politics – It's Cruelty
    LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog: Five minutes with Shami Chakrabarti: “Not guaranteeing the rights of EU nationals isn’t politics – it’s Page 1 of 3 cruelty” Five minutes with Shami Chakrabarti: “Not guaranteeing the rights of EU nationals isn’t politics – it’s cruelty” In October 2016, the leader of the UK’s Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, appointed Shami Chakrabarti as Shadow Attorney General for England and Wales. In a discussion with British Politics and Policy editor Artemis Photiadou and EUROPP’s Tena Prelec, she reflects on the challenges and advantages of the position, the situation faced by EU citizens living in the UK, and the key issues on the horizon for British politics. How have you found the transition from being a high-profile practitioner to being a frontline politician? It’s a major transition even though I was a very public practitioner and a very activist practitioner, and at times saying very difficult things, during the War on Terror for example. Even so, becoming partisan at this moment, when the referendum campaign was happening and when there was a lot of strife within the Labour Party, was quite something. And, of course, our media is not exactly the most kind or fair – the difficult transition is about learning to wear more armour emotionally. It’s really the temperature of the scrutiny – and sometimes abuse – that was possibly the bigger challenge. In terms of the actual skillsets and work, that doesn’t seem such a difficult transition. Because solving legal problems and applying law to policy is something I was reasonably familiar with first as a government lawyer, then as a human rights lawyer, and then as Director of Liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • Payroll Operations in the Americas
    Payroll Operations in the Americas — essential compliance and reporting considerations Introduction This booklet contains market-by- on newly established, standalone market guidance on the key HR operations. Where the Americas payroll and immigration matters to operation is a regional headquarters be considered as you expand your or a holding company for foreign operations across Americas, current subsidiaries, or if there are existing as of March 2019. operations in Americas, other In our experience, careful considerations must be taken into consideration of these matters at the account. outset is the most effective way of In all situations, we recommend that avoiding any issues and ensuring an you seek specific professional advice optimal set-up structure of your from the contacts listed in each business and employees in new chapter. They will take into Americas markets. consideration your specific This booklet is general in nature and circumstances and objectives. not to be relied on as professional advice. Further, the chapters focus Contents Introduction .............................................2 Ecuador .................................................20 EY contact ................................................3 El Salvador .............................................24 Argentina .................................................4 Guatemala ..............................................26 Brazil .......................................................6 Mexico ...................................................28 Canada.....................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Security Number: Legal Developments Affecting Its Collection, Disclosure, and Confidentiality
    Order Code RL30318 The Social Security Number: Legal Developments Affecting Its Collection, Disclosure, and Confidentiality Updated February 21, 2008 Kathleen S. Swendiman Legislative Attorney American Law Division The Social Security Number: Legal Developments Affecting Its Collection, Disclosure, and Confidentiality Summary While the social security number (SSN) was first introduced as a device for keeping track of contributions to the Social Security system, its use has been expanded by government entities and the private sector to keep track of many other government and private sector records. Use of the social security number as a federal government identifier was based on Executive Order 9393, issued by President Franklin Roosevelt. Beginning in the 1960s, federal agencies started adopting the social security number as a governmental identifier, and its use for keeping track of government records, on both the federal and state levels, greatly increased. Section 7 of the Privacy Act of 1974 limits compulsory divulgence of the social security number by government entities. While the Privacy Act does provide some limits on the use of the social security number by state and federal entities, exceptions provided in that statute and succeeding statutes have resulted in only minimal restrictions on governmental usage of the social security number. Constitutional challenges to social security number collection and dissemination have, for the most part, been unsuccessful. Private sector use of the social security number is widespread and continues to be largely unregulated by the federal government. The chronology in this report provides a list of federal developments affecting use of the social security number, including federal regulation of the number, as well as specific authorizations, restrictions, and fraud provisions concerning its use.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Identification (E-ID)
    EXPLAINING INTERNATIONAL IT APPLICATION LEADERSHIP: Electronic Identification Daniel Castro | September 2011 Explaining International Leadership: Electronic Identification Systems BY DANIEL CASTRO SEPTEMBER 2011 ITIF ALSO EXTENDS A SPECIAL THANKS TO THE SLOAN FOUNDATION FOR ITS GENEROUS SUPPORT FOR THIS SERIES. SEPTEMBER 2011 THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION FOUNDATION | SEPTEMBER 2011 PAGE II TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ V Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 Box 1: Electronic Passports ............................................................................................. 3 Terminology and Technology ........................................................................................... 3 Electronic Signatures, Digital Signatures and Digital Certificates ............................... 3 Identification, Authentication and Signing ................................................................ 4 Benefits of e-ID Systems ............................................................................................ 5 Electronic Identification Systems: Deployment and Use .............................................. 6 Country Profiles .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identity Documents Act (2000, Amended 2017)
    Issuer: Riigikogu Type: act In force from: 01.04.2017 In force until: 30.06.2017 Translation published: 28.03.2017 Identity Documents Act1 Passed 15.02.1999 RT I 1999, 25, 365 Entry into force 01.01.2000 Amended by the following acts Passed Published Entry into force 08.03.2000 RT I 2000, 26, 150 15.12.2000 21.03.2000 RT I 2000, 25, 148 29.03.2000 17.05.2000 RT I 2000, 40, 254 01.08.2000 08.11.2000 RT I 2000, 86, 550 02.12.2000 17.01.2001 RT I 2001, 16, 68 16.02.2001 07.03.2001 RT I 2001, 31, 173 07.04.2001 12.06.2001 RT I 2001, 56, 338 07.07.2001 19.06.2002 RT I 2002, 61, 375 01.08.2002 19.06.2002 RT I 2002, 63, 387 01.09.2002 15.10.2002 RT I 2002, 90, 516 01.12.2002 15.01.2003 RT I 2003, 13, 65 01.05.2003 22.01.2003 RT I 2003, 15, 87 27.02.2003 03.12.2003 RT I 2003, 78, 527 01.01.2004 17.12.2003 RT I 2004, 2, 4 16.01.2004 14.04.2004 RT I 2004, 28, 189 01.05.2004 14.12.2005 RT I 2006, 2, 3 01.07.2006 15.02.2006 RT I 2006, 12, 79 01.04.2006 17.05.2006 RT I 2006, 26, 191 01.08.2006 10.05.2006 RT I 2006, 26, 193 01.01.2007 07.06.2006 RT I 2006, 29, 221 28.08.2006, partially02.01.2007 14.11.2007 RT I 2007, 62, 394 Entry into force upon accession of Estonia to the European Union common visa space partially 21.12.2007 and partially 30.03.2008.
    [Show full text]
  • A Surveillance Society?
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee A Surveillance Society? Fifth Report of Session 2007–08 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 20 May 2008 HC 58-II [Incorporating HC 508-i–iv, Session 2006–07] Published on 8 June 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £24.50 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chairman) Tom Brake MP (Liberal Democrat, Charshalton and Wallington) Ms Karen Buck MP (Labour, Regent’s Park and Kensington North) Mr James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) David TC Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) Mrs Janet Dean MP (Labour, Burton) Patrick Mercer MP (Conservative, Newark) Margaret Moran MP (Labour, Luton South) Gwyn Prosser MP (Labour, Dover) Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Martin Salter MP (Labour, Reading West) Mr Gary Streeter MP (Conservative, South West Devon) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the inquiry: Rt Hon John Denham MP (Labour, Southampton Itchen) Mr Jeremy Browne MP (Liberal Democrat, Taunton) Mr Richard Benyon MP (Conservative, Newbury) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Not Go Back to 70S Primary Education Wikio
    This site uses cookies to help deliver services. By using this site, you agree to the use of cookies. Learn more Got it Conor's Commentary A blog about politics, education, Ireland, culture and travel. I am Conor Ryan, Dublin-born former adviser to Tony Blair and David Blunkett on education. Views expressed on this blog are written in a personal capacity. Friday, 20 February 2009 SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE UPDATES Let's not go back to 70s primary education Wikio Despite the Today programme's insistence on the term, "independent" is certainly not an apt Contact me description of today's report from the self-styled 'largest' review of primary education in 40 years. It You can email me here. is another deeply ideological strike against standards and effective teaching of the 3Rs in our primary schools. Many of its contributors oppose the very idea of school 'standards' and have an ideological opposition to external testing. They have been permanent critics of the changes of recent decades. And it is only in that light that the review's conclusions can be understood. Of course, there is no conflict between teaching literacy and numeracy, and the other subjects within the primary curriculum. And the best schools do indeed show how doing them all well provides a good and rounded education. Presenting this as the point of difference is a diversionary Aunt Sally. However, there is a very real conflict between recognising the need to single literacy and numeracy out for extra time over the other subjects as with the dedicated literacy and numeracy lessons, and making them just another aspect of primary schooling that pupils may or may not pick up along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • For Effective Parliamentary Liberty Has a Strong Reputation Ork and Lobbying, We Make Campaigning
    www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk Liberty has a strong reputation for effective parliamentary campaigning. Through policy work and lobbying, we make the arguments that matter in the corridors of Westminster to MPs of all parties. We strive to hold the government to account by undertaking groundbreaking test case litigation and high profile media campaigns. As a result, we are now an essential voice in the national political debate. But that’s just the public side of the story. This work is only possible because of people like you, who care about protecting civil liberties and promoting human rights. You can help make effective campaigning possible by writing to your MP, signing petitions and debating with your friends. Even more importantly, join Liberty as a member and provide the vital support that keeps us going. This campaign guide is about making action count. It provides you with advice on how best to lobby and raise awareness of the important issues we face today. Like charity, human rights start at home. Our Common Values campaign is all about increasing respect for human rights and countering the negative myths. As a Liberty supporter, you are the key to helping us achieve this. We hope this guide will help. Shami Chakrabarti, Director of Liberty Promote Uphold d respect for justice an human rights the rule and civil liberties of law dvance h ct A r nd muc Prote ights fo a r le ore... privacy and ulnerab m v es free speech minoriti Liberty – Then and Now For the best part of a century, Liberty and our members have acted as the conscience of a nation, fighting injustice and placing principle above populism when others have faltered.
    [Show full text]