Impact of Ligado's Proposal on SATCOM, Aviation and Weather Data Users

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Impact of Ligado's Proposal on SATCOM, Aviation and Weather Data Users Impact of Ligado’s Proposal on SATCOM, Aviation and Weather Data Users SEPTEMBER 2019 1 Overview of the Impact of Ligado’s Proposal FCC rules allow for holders of mobile satellite service (MSS) spectrum to include an “ ancillary ” terrestrial component as part of their service, provided that the service is ancillary and does not cause harmful interference to existing MSS providers After emerging from bankruptcy, in December 2015 Ligado Networks (formerly LightSquared) applied to the FCC to operate a modified ancillary terrestrial network operating in the L‐band (used by GPS, SATCOM providers, and weather/environmental data community) Despite its press push, there remain significant concerns over harmful interference from Ligado’s proposal from multiple parties: • GPS will be heavily impacted by Ligado’s plans, creating safety issues for aviation, and interference to many other types of GPS systems • Ligado’s proposed network will have potentially millions of mobile devices transmitting just 1 MHz away from critical SATCOM services, including cockpit communications • Real‐time weather satellite data from NOAA will face interference if Ligado is approved to operate in 1675‐1680 MHz, degrading data relayed in real time via satellite from stream gauges for flooding, fire sensors for wildfire management, and tide gauges for coastal evacuations in hurricanes 2 L-Band Neighborhood GSO MSS GSO MSS Other Satellite Downlink Uplink Services Including Ligado leased spectrum in 1670-1675 MHz and NOAA in 1675- 1680 MHz Frequency, MHz 3 Impact to GPS Usage • Ligado is planning 10,000+ sites that would interfere with certified aviation GPS when aircraft are operating in close proximity • "The concerns and safety issues of the industry have NOT been addressed, particularly when considering the lack of testing in key areas” - Letter from Eleven Aviation Organizations to FAA Acting Administrator Elwell, June 2018 • GPS interference is a safety of flight issue for low‐level aircraft operators • Threat to medivac, state and local emergency aviation operations • GPS is a key sensor system for the Terrain Awareness and Warning System (TAWS) • Ligado yet to fully explain all necessary control measures • Possible greater impact to other GPS operations • DOT Adjacent Band Compatibility study reported that high‐precision GPS are more vulnerable than certified aviation receivers We believe there are further serious concerns about the impact of Ligado’s proposed operations on special, and scientific users of GPS that should be fully explored, such as: • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) • Weather data and forecast • Space‐based receivers This risk is far too great … for Ligado’s proposal to be approved. While there are many broadband alternatives “ (Ligado would be a very small percentage of this national asset), there is only one GPS. ‐ PNT Advisory Board August 2018 Letter to PNT ExCom 4 ” SatCom: A New Era for Global Connectivity • On January 11, 2019 , a flight‐proven SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launched from Iridium constellation with Vandenberg Air Force Base and delivered 100% global service area the final 10 Iridium® NEXT satellites to low earth orbit (LEO) • This is the largest satellite constellation replacement ever • 66 cross‐linked, low earth orbit (LEO) satellites • Only fully global voice and data provider; approximately 1,213,000 subscribers • Efficient operations using only 8.725 MHz of spectrum worldwide for uplink and downlink • Messages are routed from satellite to satellite and grounded at teleports Architecture of 6 orbital planes of 11 satellites each at 780 km altitude around the world 5 SatCom: Harmful Interference to Iridium Services • Ligado seeks to operate a modified ancillary terrestrial network operating in the L‐band, including the 10 MHz adjacent to Iridium at 1627.5‐1637.5 MHz • Iridium’s technical analysis (submitted to FCC on Sept. 1, 2016) and aviation‐specific technical analysis (submitted to FCC on Dec. 14, 2016) indicates that this terrestrial operation on that 10 MHz of spectrum would result in significant harmful interference to Iridium’s mobile terminals, including those used for vital SATCOM aviation services • Section 25.255 of the FCC’s rules requires Ligado to resolve any harmful interference from their terrestrial operations; purpose of the rule is clear – maximize flexibility consistent with sound spectrum management while providing absolute interference protection for incumbent MSS providers 6 SatCom: Interference to air traffic control • Interference to SATCOM exists for critical air traffic control and other safety‐of‐ life communications used by the commercial and general aviation industry with the Inmarsat MSS network • In 2016, Ligado acknowledged the potential interference to SATCOM transceivers installed on thousands of in‐service aircraft, and indicated it would collaborate with Inmarsat and others to resolve these issues • Interference from Ligado’s network could likely be avoided through the installation of a new Diplexer/Low Noise Amplifier (DLNA) in each aircraft • The retrofit process would be time‐consuming, costly and require extensive efforts to secure Type Certifications from the FAA • Compensation would be required to cover the significant installation costs for aircraft servicing centers and lost opportunity costs for aircraft owners • Ligado now disclaims any obligation to ensure the retrofit process is funded and completed, and states that the dispute is a disagreement between a vendor and its customers and does not involve Ligado • Ensuring the reliability of aviation safety communications is a fundamental public interest obligation of the Commission 7 Broad Opposition to Ligado Proposal “The [coalition] continues to have serious unresolved concerns with Ligado’s proposed operations … The existing services provided by the GPS, SATCOM, aviation and real‐time environmental satellite data communities, which depend upon interference‐free operations in spectrum adjacent to or co‐channel to spectrum central to Ligado’s plans, are too important to jeopardize, especially for the speculative benefits of Ligado’s constantly evolving proposals, details of which continue to be lacking.” July 18, 2018 ex parte letter Coalition of Aviation, SATCOM and Weather Information Users ● AccuWeather ● American Geophysical Union ● Satelles Inc. ● Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc. ● International Air Transport Association ● National Air Transportation Association ● Aerospace Industries Association ● American Weather and Climate ● National Hydrologic Warning Council ● DTN (formerly Schneider Electric) Industry Association ● National Weather Association ● Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association ● Iridium Communications, Inc. ● Resilient Navigation & Timing ● General Aviation Manufacturers Association ● American Meteorological Society Foundation ● Airlines for America ● Lockheed Martin ● National Emergency Number ● Gogo Business Aviation ● Microcom Design, Inc. Association ● ALERT Users Group ● Rockwell Collins Inc. ● University of Wisconsin, Space Science ● Helicopter Association International ● Narayan Strategy and Engineering Center 8 Ligado is not 5G • Ligado lacks sufficient contiguous spectrum for 4G, let alone 5G • 5G network designers are contemplating channel widths of 100 megahertz for 5G applications • Even if Ligado is able to cobble together 40 megahertz of spectrum across several different frequency bands, Ligado could at best offer 10 megahertz‐wide channels • The FCC’s 5G FAST Plan does not consider Ligado or L‐band spectrum as part of its 5G plans • Most of the spectrum that Ligado would use for its “5G” network is allocated to satellite services. Ligado has been unable to show that its terrestrial operations will not interfere with satellite operations • Ligado’s spectrum is not part of the 3GPP standards for 5G, or any other recognized standard. Although it claimed that it would become part of the 3GPP standard in 2015, it still hasn’t happened • Ligado’s spectrum is not harmonized regionally for terrestrial use 9 The FCC Should Deny or Disregard Ligado’s Section 7 Request • Section 7 states: “(a) It shall be the policy of the United States to encourage the provision of new technologies and services to the public… (b) The Commission shall determine whether any new technology or service proposed in a petition or application is in the public interest within one year after such petition or application is filed…” • Ligado’s proposed operations do not qualify as “new technologies or services” under Section 7 – The M2Z decision squarely rejects Ligado’s theory – Applications for License and Authority to Operate in the 2155-2175 MHz Band , Order, 22 FCC Rcd 16563 (2007), affirmed M2Z Networks, Inc. v. FCC, 558 F.3d 554 (D.C. Cir. 2009) • Providing 5G service alone cannot satisfy Section 7 • Ligado is not proposing to offer 5G service • Ligado’s proposed system is not otherwise a new technology or new service under Section 7 • Even if Section 7 applied in this instance, the provision’s one‐year shot clock only started ticking on June 25, 2019, the date of Ligado’s Section 7 Request • Even if Ligado were offering a new technology or service, it has not resolved longstanding public interest concerns with its proposed terrestrial network 10 FCC Process • 2001: Mobile Satellite Ventures (MSV), Ligado’s predecessor, applies to provide a terrestrial and spot‐beam satellite service and FCC starts rulemaking to adopt ATC rules • 2003: FCC adopts ATC Order which sets rules for licensing and operation of ATCs
Recommended publications
  • Inmarsat Istheleadingprovider Ofglobal, Mobilesatellite Communicationssolutions
    B A I N N M N A U R A S L A R U T E P P O L C R T A N I D L A C C O U N D T S 2 0 1 6 I N M G O M E N T U M INMARSAT ISTHE LEADING PROVIDER OF GLOBAL, MOBILESATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTIONS. Our communications services are utilised by governments, commercial enterprises, particularly in the Maritime and Aviation industries, and humanitarian organisations across theworld. Inmarsat’swholly-owned and operated satellite constellations deliver unparalleled reliability to support mission-critical communications, ensure safety on land, at sea and in the air, drive innovation and bring new economic and social benefits to even the most isolated communities. STRATEGIC REPORT GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 56 Corporate governance introduction 104 Financialstatements index OVERVIEW 58 Board of Directors 105 Independent Auditor’s report 01 Investor proposition 61 Report of the Directors 112 Consolidated income statement 01 Financial highlights 65 Corporate governance report 113 Consolidated statement of 01 Business highlights 78 Relationswith shareholders comprehensive income 02 Group at a glance 79 Directors’ Remuneration Report 114 Consolidated balance sheet 04 Chairman’s statement 103 Directors’ responsibility statement 115 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 116 Consolidated cashflow statement STRATEGY 117 Notes to the consolidated 06 Chief Executive’s strategic review financial statements 12 Our key performance indicators 159 Company financial statements 14 Our markets 161 Notes to the Company financial statements 18 Our strategy 162
    [Show full text]
  • DOD Concerns About the FCC-Approved Ligado Network
    INSIGHTi DOD Concerns About the FCC-Approved Ligado Network Updated October 8, 2020 On April 20, 2020, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) unanimously approved an application by Ligado Networks LLC (Ligado) to “deploy a low-power [9.8 decibel watts (dBW)] terrestrial nationwide network in the 1526-1536 MHz, 1627.5-1637.5 MHz, and 1646.5-1656.5 MHz bands [of the electromagnetic spectrum] that will primarily support Internet of Things (IoT) services.” These frequency bands are traditionally used for satellite operations. The Department of Defense (DOD) opposed this decision—along with the Department of Homeland Security, Department of Transportation (DOT), Department of Interior, Department of Justice, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and others. That opposition related to concerns that Ligado’s proposed network could interfere with signals from satellites to Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers. Congress may consider federal agency concerns, including DOD concerns related to mission-critical systems and the FCC’s response, as it conducts oversight of the FCC’s ruling. Congress may also consider broader issues related to fifth generation (5G) mobile technologies, such as the allocation of spectrum among competing users and the impact of spectrum decisions on national security. DOD Concerns and Related Studies on GPS Interference In both its formal response to the FCC’s ruling and its May 6, 2020, testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), DOD cited two primary studies that shaped its belief that the Ligado network “would cause unacceptable operational impacts and adversely affect the military potential of GPS”: a 2018 DOT study and a 2016 classified study conducted by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Info Services (AIS), 155 Advanced Wireless Research Initiative (AWRI), 35 Africa, 161-162 AIR 6468, 23 Alaskan Telco GC
    Index Advanced Info Services (AIS), 155 Belgium Competition Authority Advanced Wireless Research Initiative (BCA), 73 (AWRI), 35 Bharti Airtel, 144, 162 Africa, 161–162 Bite,´ 88 AIR 6468, 23 Bouygues, 79 Alaskan telco GCI, 134 Brazil, 125 Altice USA, 132 Broadband Radio Services (BRS), America´ Movil,´ 125, 129 137–138 Android, 184 BT Plus, 105 Antel, 139 BT/EE, 185 Apple, 186–190 Bulgaria, 74 Asia Pacific Telecom (APT), 154 Asia-Pacific Telecommunity (APT), 6, C-band, 26 25–26 Cableco/MVNO CJ Hello, 153 AT&T, 129, 131 Canada, 125–127 Auction Carrier aggregation (CA), 5, 22 coverage obligation, 10 CAT Telecom, 155 plans, 137–139 Cellular IoT (CIoT), 31 reserve prices, 9 Centimetre wave (cmWave), 34–35 Auction methods, 8–9 Centuria, 88 combinatorial clock, 8 Ceragon Networks, 93 simultaneous multi-round Channel Islands Competition and ascending, 8 Regulatory Authorities Augmented reality, 195 (CICRA), 83, 88 Australia, 139–140 Chief Technology Officer (CTO), 185 Austria, 71–73 Chile, 127–128 Autonomous transport, 195 Chile, private networks, 127–128 Average revenue per user (ARPU), China, 141–142 165–166, 197 China Broadcasting Network (CBN), Axtel, 129 141 China Mobile, 141 Backhaul, 24–25 China Telecom, 141 Bahrain, 156 China Unicom, 39, 141–142 Batelco, 156 Chipsets, 186–190 Beamforming, 24, 29 Chunghwa Telecom, 154 Beauty contest, 8 Citizens Broadband Radio Service Belgacom, 73 (CBRS), 130–131 Belgium, 73–74 CK Hutchison, 145 210 Index Cloud computing, 24 Eir Group, 85 Co-operative MIMO. See Coordinated Electromagnetic fields (EMFs), 38–39
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report
    2020 ANNUAL REPORT INTER-AMERICAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMMISSION (CITEL) CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 6 2. ORIGIN AND STRUCTURE OF CITEL ....................................................................................... 6 2.1 OBJECTIVES AND FUNCTIONS OF CITEL (ARTICLE 3 OF THE CITEL STATUTE) ..................... 6 2.2 MEMBERS AND PARTICIPANTS ............................................................................................... 7 2.3 STRUCTURE OF CITEL ......................................................................................................... 8 3. ACTIVITIES OF CITEL ................................................................................................................. 9 3.1 PERMANENT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF CITEL (COM/CITEL) ......................................... 9 3.2 PERMANENT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE I: TELECOMMUNICATIONS/ICTS (PCC.I) .......... 11 3.3 PERMANENT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE II: RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS (PCC.II) .............. 14 4. ACTIVITIES OF THE SECRETARIAT ....................................................................................... 15 4.1 2030 ICT ALLIANCE FOR THE AMERICAS ............................................................................ 15 4.2 RURAL WOMEN’S ALLIANCE: EMPOWERING RURAL WOMEN THROUGH ICT ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Organization Ex Parte Submission to FCC on Use Of
    1800 M S TREET, NW S UITE 800N W ASHINGTON, DC 20036 T EL 202.783.4141 F AX 202.783.5851 WWW. WBKLAW. COM P ATRICK R. H ALLEY 202.383.3356 PHALLEY@ WBKLAW. COM September 27, 2018 BY EFILE Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street S.W., Room TW-A325 Washington, DC 20554 Re: Ligado Network Subsidiary LLC, Amendment to License Modification Applications, IBFS File Nos. SAT-AMD-20180531-00045, SAT-AMD- 20180531-00044, SES-AMD-20180531-00856; SES-MOD-20151231- 00981, SAT-MOD-20151231-00090, and SAT-MOD-20151231-00091; IB Docket Nos. 12-340, 11-109 Dear Ms. Dortch: Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission’s rules,1 this letter provides notice that on September 25 and September 26, 2018, a coalition of organizations representing entities that provide and rely upon critical GPS, satellite communications (“SATCOM”) services, and essential weather and other environmental data (the “Coalition”), met with Umair Javed, legal advisor to Commissioner Rosenworcel and Erin McGrath, legal advisor to Commissioner O’Rielly, to discuss the continued concerns with Ligado’s request to operate a terrestrial mobile broadband service in the L-Band satellite spectrum neighborhood. In addition to the undersigned, the list of individuals present in each meeting is attached. During the meeting, the Coalition reiterated each of the multiple interference concerns raised in a letter sent to Chairman Pai from 27 organizations on July 18, 2018.2 The Coalition stated that numerous organizations, and the many entities they represent, continue to have serious unresolved concerns over harmful interference from Ligado’s proposed terrestrial operations.
    [Show full text]
  • September 28, 2020 VIA ECFS Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12Th Street, SW Washington, DC 2
    September 28, 2020 VIA ECFS Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: Written Ex Parte Presentation: IB Docket Nos. 11-109 and 12-340 Dear Ms. Dortch: Former NASA Administrator Daniel Goldin continues to claim that the Federal Communications Commission’s (“Commission”) approval of the proposal by Ligado Networks LLC (“Ligado”) to repurpose satellite spectrum in the L-Band for high-power terrestrial use should be upheld because it will help advance American leadership in Fifth Generation (“5G”) technologies.1/ The extremely tenuous linkage between the changes in spectrum use authorized in the Ligado Order and the compelling need to advance 5G in this country has been the subject of extensive discussion in the Petitions for Reconsideration and ex parte presentations in this proceeding.2/ As the GPS Innovation Alliance (“GPSIA”) explains in further detail below, Mr. Goldin’s broad and unsupported assertions add little to the record. The availability of Ligado’s spectrum for terrestrial use will not contribute to the advancement of 5G but will instead undermine U.S. Global Positioning System (“GPS”) receivers and devices that are foundational to wireless technology in general, including 5G. 1/ See Letter from the Hon. Daniel S. Goldin, NASA Administrator (1992-2001), to Chairman Pai, FCC, IB Docket Nos. 11-109 and 12-340 (filed Sept. 8, 2020) (“Goldin Letter”); LightSquared Technical Working Group Report, et al., Order and Authorization, 35 FCC Rcd 3772 (2020) (“Ligado Order”). 2/ See, e.g., Petition for Reconsideration of Air Line Pilots Association, International, IB Docket Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Promoting the Deployment of 5G ) GN Docket No. 21-63 Open Radio Access Networks ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE OPEN RAN POLICY COALITION Diane Rinaldo Executive Director OPEN RAN POLICY COALITION P.O. Box 63344 Farragut Post Office 1800 M Street NW FRNT 1 Washington, DC 20033 (202) 747-4041 April 28, 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 4 I. THE COMMERCIAL COMMUNICATIONS ECOSYTEM IS RAPIDLY DEVELOPING AND DEPLOYING OPEN RAN. ........................................................................................... 5 II. OPEN RAN WILL PROVIDE SIGNIFICANT PUBLIC INTEREST BENEFITS. ............ 18 A. Open RAN Will Drive Increased Competition, Innovation and Network Vendor Diversity. ......................................................................................................................... 19 B. Open RAN Provides Technological Improvements that Benefit Network Management and Innovation. ................................................................................................................ 21 C. Open RAN Has the Potential to Make Services and Products More Affordable, Including Those in Rural and Low-Income Communities. ............................................. 23 D. As a Complement to Parallel Advances in 5G and Network Management, Open and Interoperable RAN Will Enhance Network Security. ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FCC-20-48A1.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 20-48 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) LightSquared Technical Working Group Report ) IB Docket No. 11-109 ) LightSquared License Modification Application, ) IB Docket No. 12-340 IBFS Files Nos. SAT-MOD-20120928-00160, - ) 00161, SES-MOD-20121001-00872 ) ) New LightSquared License Modification ) IB Docket No. 11-109; IB Docket No. 12-340 Applications IBFS File Nos. SES-MOD-20151231- ) 00981, SAT-MOD-20151231-00090, and SAT- ) MOD-20151231-00091 ) ) Ligado Amendment to License Modification ) IB Docket No. 11-109 Applications IBFS File Nos. SES-MOD-20151231- ) 00981, SAT-MOD-20151231-00090, and SAT- ) MOD-20151231-00091 ) ORDER AND AUTHORIZATION Adopted: April 19, 2020 Released: April 22, 2020 By the Commission: Commissioner Carr issuing a statement; Commissioners Rosenworcel and Starks Concurring and issuing a Joint Statement. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Ligado’s MSS and MSS ATC Authorizations ................................................................................. 4 B. Ligado’s 2015 License Modification Applications and the Agreements with GPS Device Manufacturers .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Start-Up Space Update on Investment in Commercial Space Ventures
    Start-Up Space Update on Investment in Commercial Space Ventures 2019 Contents Executive Summary . i Introduction . 1 Purpose and Background . 1 Methodology . 1 Overview of Start-Up Space Ventures. 4 Overview of Space Investors .......................6 Space Investment by the Numbers ................13 Seed Funding . 16 Venture Capital . 17 Private Equity . 19 Acquisition . 19 Public Offering . 20 Debt Financing . 20 Investment Across All Types . 20 Valuation . 22 Space Investors by the Numbers ..................23 Overall . 23 Angels . 26 Venture Capital Firms . 27 Private Equity Groups . 30 Corporations . 31 Banks and Other Financial Institutions . 34 Start-Up Space: What’s Next? . 35 Acknowledgements .............................37 3 Executive Summary The Start-Up Space series examines space investment in the 21st century and analyzes investment trends, focusing on investors in new companies that have acquired private financing. Start-up space companies had a record year of funding in 2018, newly attracting investment from entities like Boeing, Rolls Royce, and Morgan Stanley . Additionally, for the first time, the number of investors outside the United States nearly equals the number of investors within the United States. Some maturing ventures are now generating revenue, but many start-up space companies have not yet definitively demonstrated business case success. The overall viability of the start-up space ecosystem will be a critical topic in the next several years . Start-Up Space reports on investment in start-up space ventures, defined as space companies that began as angel- and venture capital-backed start-ups. The report tracks seed, venture, and private equity investment in start-up space ventures as they grow and mature, from 2000 through the end of 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • EXHIBITOR PROSPECTUS Conference: MARCH 12-15, 2018 Exhibition: MARCH 13-15, 2018 Walter E
    EXHIBITOR PROSPECTUS Conference: MARCH 12-15, 2018 Exhibition: MARCH 13-15, 2018 Walter E. Washington Convention Center Washington D.C. JOIN US FOR THE LARGEST AND MOST IMPORTANT GLOBAL SATELLITE AND SPACE TECHNOLOGY EVENT OF THE YEAR SATELLITE exhibitors and sponsors enjoy unparalleled access to prospective and current customers, as well as integrators and strategic partners at every level of the value chain. Use SATELLITE to: • Make Face-to-Face Connections • Build Brand Awareness • Announce New Products • Generate New Leads Exhibit space is going fast! • Solidify Business Relationships Contact us today to reserve your booth before it’s too late! www.SATShow.com | #SATShow | @SATELLITEDC INSIDE THE NUMBERS SATELLITE 2017 was the largest event in our 35+ year history, attracting thousands of new attendees from all end-user markets and industry. Overview Purchasing Plans 14,611 total SATELLITE registrants 28% of attendees will make a purchase 350 exhibiting companies within 6 months following the show 85,000 net sq. ft. of exhibit space 39% of attendees will make a purchase 23% international registrants from more within 6-12 months following the show than 111 countries represented 33% of attendees will make a purchase 90+ members of the press, including tv coverage within 12-24 months following the show from CNBC, Bloomberg TV, Reuters, and more Attendees by Primary Business Purchasing Power Broadband/Broadcast — 10% 31% of SATELLITE attendees are C-level Business/Information Services/End User — 15% and executive management Military/Government
    [Show full text]
  • May 2020 Vol 12 Issue 9
    EIB World Trade Headlines Evolutions In Business • www.eib.com • (978) 256-0438 Fax: (978) 250-4529 • P.O. Box 4008, Chelmsford, MA 01824 May 15, 2020 – Volume 12, Issue 9 NEWSLETTER NOTES When Does Hand Sanitizer Expire? Here's How * When Does Hand Sanitizer to Know If It's Still Safe to Use Expire? … * DEPARTMENT OF… By Nancy Mattia May 01, 2020 * WTO IS THREATENED * How Slovakia Is Beating Among the products that have been in short supply since the novel coronavirus Covid-19 started sweeping the nation a few months ago is hand sanitizer. It's no wonder: * SEC probes Raytheon … Washing your hands on a frequent basis is one of the best defenses against contracting—or spreading—the deadly virus. If you're like most people, though, * Pentagon officials slam you've looked everywhere for a bottle of sanitizer only to find that all the grocery FCC’s Ligado … stores, online retailers, even office-supply stores say the same thing: out of * FCC relaxes federal review stock. Three little words, one big worry—what now? rules to … * Trade Show Floor Robots Then, you find a bottle that's been sitting in the back of your closet probably for several years. Is it still good, or does hand sanitizer expire after awhile? To find * Is American Manufacturing out, we investigated the facts on manufacturing and regulation. Falling … * Can AI Predict the Next Does hand sanitizer have an expiration date, and does it lose its effectiveness Pandemic? immediately after it? * Chinese Cyberattacks May Be Hindering … Yes, hand sanitizer does have an expiration date, but that doesn't necessarily mean you should throw it out if the date listed on the bottle has passed.
    [Show full text]
  • DOD Concerns About the FCC-Approved Ligado Network
    INSIGHTi DOD Concerns About the FCC-Approved Ligado Network Updated February 5, 2021 On April 20, 2020, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) unanimously approved an application by Ligado Networks LLC (Ligado) to “deploy a low-power [9.8 decibel watts (dBW)] terrestrial nationwide network in the 1526-1536 MHz, 1627.5-1637.5 MHz, and 1646.5-1656.5 MHz bands [of the electromagnetic spectrum] that will primarily support Internet of Things (IoT) services.” These frequency bands are traditionally used for satellite operations. The Department of Defense (DOD) opposed this decision—along with the Department of Homeland Security, Department of Transportation (DOT), Department of Interior, Department of Justice, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and others. That opposition related to concerns that Ligado’s proposed network could interfere with signals from satellites to Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers. Congress may consider federal agency concerns, including DOD concerns related to mission-critical systems and the FCC’s response, as it conducts oversight of the FCC’s ruling. Congress may also consider broader issues related to fifth generation (5G) mobile technologies, such as the allocation of spectrum among competing users and the impact of spectrum decisions on national security. DOD Concerns and Related Studies on GPS Interference In both its formal response to the FCC’s ruling and its May 6, 2020, testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), DOD cited two primary studies that shaped its belief that the Ligado network “would cause unacceptable operational impacts and adversely affect the military potential of GPS”: a 2018 DOT study and a 2016 classified study conducted by the U.S.
    [Show full text]