Cultural Resources Study for the Atherton Civic Center Master Plan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
APPENDIX D: CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY FOR THE ATHERTON CIVIC CENTER MASTER PLAN ........................................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................................ A Cultural Resources Study for the Atherton Civic Center Master Plan, Atherton, San Mateo County, California Janine M. Origer, M.A./R.P.A. December 2014 A Cultural Resources Study for the Atherton Civic Center Master Plan, Atherton, San Mateo County, California Prepared by: ___________________________ Janine M. Origer M.A./R.P.A. Tom Origer & Associates Post Office Box 1531 Rohnert Park, California 94927 (707) 584-8200 (707) 584-8300 (fax) Prepared for: Steve Noack PlaceWorks 1625 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 300 Berkeley, California 94709 December 2014 ABSTRACT Tom Origer & Associates conducted a cultural resources study for the proposed renovation and reconfiguration of the Atherton Civic Center, San Mateo County, California. The proposed project includes demolition of 21,000 square feet of existing structures, retaining 3,700 square feet of existing structures, and building 38,000 square feet of new structures. Additionally, the project includes the removal of several heritage trees and the reconfiguration of Ashfield Road and Dinkelspiel Station Lane around the new Civic Center. The study was requested by Steve Noack, PlaceWorks, in compliance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. This study included archival research at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University (NWIC File No. 14-0523), examination of the library and files of Tom Origer & Associates, field inspection of the project location, and contact with the Native American community. Field survey of the study area found no archaeological resources. The CalTrain passenger structure and the existing Town Hall appear eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources. Documentation pertaining to this study is on file at the offices of Tom Origer & Associates (File No. 2014-120). Synopsis Project: Atherton Civic Center Master Plan Location: Atherton, San Mateo County, California Quadrangle: Palo Alto, California 7.5’ series Study Type: Intensive survey Scope: 75,000 square foot Civic Center Finds: Atherton Town Hall and Caltrain 'Atherton Station' i Project Personnel Janine M. Origer conducted the study. Ms. Origer has 30 years of experience in cultural resources management. She has been with Tom Origer & Associates since 1991. She has worked on both prehistoric and historical archaeological sites, and has completed research and documentation of historical buildings. Ms. Origer holds a Master of Arts in Archaeology and Heritage from the University of Leicester. She has completed extensive continuing education in regulatory compliance, planning local surveys, and identifying historical resources. She is affiliated with the California Historical Society, International Association for Obsidian Studies, Society for American Archaeology, Society of Architectural Historians, Society for California Archaeology (Secretary of the Executive Board 2004-2006), Society for Historical Archaeology, Vernacular Architecture Forum, and the Register of Professional Archaeologists (#1066030). Julianne Mercer contributed to the preparation of the report. Ms. Mercer holds a Bachelor of Arts in History from Sonoma State University. ii CONTENTS Abstract ..................................................................................................................................................... i Synopsis ............................................................................................................................................... i Project Personnel ................................................................................................................................. ii Contents .................................................................................................................................................. iii Contents .................................................................................................................................................. iii Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 1 Regulatory Context .................................................................................................................................. 1 Project Setting .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Study Area Location and Description ................................................................................................. 3 Cultural Setting.................................................................................................................................... 3 Study Procedures and Findings................................................................................................................ 5 Native American Contact .................................................................................................................... 5 Archival Study Procedures .................................................................................................................. 5 Archival Study Findings ...................................................................................................................... 6 Field Survey Procedures ...................................................................................................................... 6 Field Survey Findings ......................................................................................................................... 6 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 7 Known Resources ................................................................................................................................ 7 Accidental Discovery .......................................................................................................................... 9 Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Materials Consulted ............................................................................................................................... 11 Appendix A: Native American Contact FIGURES Figure 1. Project vicinity 1 Figure 2. Study location 4 iii INTRODUCTION This report describes a cultural resources survey for the proposed renovation and reconfiguration of the Atherton Civic Center, San Mateo County, California (Figure 1). This study was prepared for Steve Noack, PlaceWorks, in compliance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Documentation pertaining to this study is on file at Tom Origer & Associates (File No. 2014- 120). The proposed project consists of renovating and reconfiguring the existing 75,000 square foot Civic Center in Atherton. It includes demolition of approximately 21,000 square feet of building space, including the Town Administration building, Police Department, Police Garage, Permit Center, Library, storage facility, and Public Works offices. Buildings to be retained include the 1,700 square foot Council Chambers and the 2,000 square foot existing Public Works yard. A new 25,000 square foot Town Administration building, a 1,300 square foot Police ancillary building, and a 9,000 square foot library are proposed as well. Additionally, the project includes the removal of several heritage trees and the reconfiguration of Ashfield Road and Dinkelspiel Station Lane around the new Civic Center. Figure 1. Project vicinity (adapted from the 1970 San Francisco 1:250,000-scale USGS map). REGULATORY CONTEXT The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that cultural resources be considered during the environmental review process. This is accomplished by an inventory of resources within a study area and by assessing the potential that cultural resources could be affected by development. This cultural resources survey was designed to satisfy environmental issues specified in the CEQA 1 and its guidelines (Title 14 CCR §15064.5) by: (1) identifying all cultural resources within the project area; (2) offering a preliminary significance evaluation of the identified cultural resources; (3) assessing resource vulnerability to effects that could arise from project activities; and (4) offering suggestions designed to protect resource integrity, as warranted. Resource Definitions Cultural resources are classified by the State Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) as sites, buildings, structures, objects and districts, and each is described by OHP (1995) as follows. Site. A site is the location of a significant event, a prehistoric or historic occupation or activity, or a building or structure, whether standing, ruined, or vanished, where the location itself possesses historic, cultural, or archaeo-logical value regardless of the value of any existing structure. Building. A building, such as a house, barn, church, hotel, or similar construc-tion, is created principally to shelter any form of human activity. "Building" may also be used to refer to a historically and functionally related