Riders in the Sky! Page 23
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Xlvets Members Handbook 2016.Pdf
47383blu_Members Handbook 2015 AW 23/12/2015 15:58 Page 2 2016 Members Handbook www.xlvets.co.uk 47383blu_Members Handbook 2015 AW 23/12/2015 15:58 Page 3 47383blu_Members Handbook 2015 AW 23/12/2015 15:58 Page 4 It’s All About Getting Involved As XLVet members we believe that independent veterinary practices are the powerhouses to achieve XLVets the highest quality of service to our clients. And by working together, sharing experience, knowledge Page 04 Five Pillars for Excellence and skills, we will deliver excellence in veterinary Page 06 XLVets Members’ Mandate practice so that we are seen as experts in animal Page 08 XLVets Values health all over the world. Page 10 XLVets Strategic Plan Page 12 XLVets Business Team XLVets is an organisation of its members, for its members. Page 46 IT Services The Board of XLVets expects all of its members to actively Page 47 Email, Web Forums and Website participate within the group and to share ideas, knowledge Page 50 XLVets Member Services A - Z Guide and experience with other group members. The Board requires members to work in collaboration with other members to achieve positive outcomes. Business Management This booklet is designed to provide a summary of useful information so that you can get involved and take part with Page 14 Business Management Executive XLVets initiatives and also in order to allow you to include Page 15 Business Management Activity Plan these activities in your own practice plans for 2016. Page 17 Marketing Page 18 The Rationale for Preferred Products and Services Page 19 Using the XLVets Brandmark Page 21 Calendar 2015 XLVets members An up to date list of all XLVets member practices including an interactive google map of their locations can be found Farm on the XLVets website www.xlvets.co.uk Page 24 Farm Calendar Farm Activity Plan For further informationon any aspect of your Page 26 Farm Regional Groups XLVets membership contact the XLVets team Page 27 Farm Articles Page 29 Broomhall Buying Services Ltd on 01228 711788. -
W31 27/07/19 – 02/08/19
W31 27/07/19 – 02/08/19 2 Showstoppers: Best of the Royal Welsh 2019 3 Our Lives: Taking on the Irish Sea 4 Warriors: Our Homeless World Cup 5 Keeping Faith 6 Saving Britain’s Worst Zoo 7 Tudur’s TV Flashback Places of interest / Llefydd o ddiddordeb: Aberystwyth 3 Borth 6 Builth Wells / Llanelwedd 2 Llangrannog 3 New Quay / Cei Newydd 3 Port Talbot 4 Swansea / Abertawe 4 Follow @BBCWalesPress on Twitter to keep up with all the latest news from BBC Wales Dilynwch @BBCWalesPress ar Twitter i gael y newyddion diweddaraf am BBC Cymru NOTE TO EDITORS: All details correct at time of going to press, but programmes are liable to change. Please check with BBC Cymru Wales Communications on 029 2032 2115 before publishing. NODYN I OLYGYDDION: Mae’r manylion hyn yn gywir wrth fynd i’r wasg, ond mae rhaglenni yn gallu newid. Cyn cyhoeddi gwybodaeth, cysylltwch â’r Adran Gyfathrebu ar 029 2032 2115 1 SHOWSTOPPERS: BEST OF THE ROYAL WELSH 2019 Sunday, 28 July BBC One Wales, 6.05pm BBC Countryfile’s Sean Fletcher and farmer and broadcaster Gareth Wyn Jones present a special celebration of the very best moments from the biggest agricultural show in Europe – The Royal Welsh Show 2019. Looking back at the event’s one hundredth show, the pair will be joined by well-known faces who’ve been at the showground throughout the week including Keeping Faith star Eve Myles, former Welsh international Shane Williams and Carol Vorderman. They’ll also discover more about the show’s royal connections and catch up on some of the big winners in the week’s fiercely fought competitions. -
The Social Identity of Wales in Question: an Analysis of Culture, Language, and Identity in Cardiff, Bangor, and Aberystwyth
Linfield University DigitalCommons@Linfield Fulbright Grantee Projects Office of Competitive Scholarships 8-3-2012 The Social Identity of Wales in Question: An Analysis of Culture, Language, and Identity in Cardiff, Bangor, and Aberystwyth Clara Martinez Linfield College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/fulbright Part of the Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, and the International and Intercultural Communication Commons Recommended Citation Martinez, Clara, "The Social Identity of Wales in Question: An Analysis of Culture, Language, and Identity in Cardiff, Bangor, and Aberystwyth" (2012). Fulbright Grantee Projects. Article. Submission 4. https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/fulbright/4 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It is brought to you for free via open access, courtesy of DigitalCommons@Linfield, with permission from the rights-holder(s). Your use of this Article must comply with the Terms of Use for material posted in DigitalCommons@Linfield, or with other stated terms (such as a Creative Commons license) indicated in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, or if you have questions about permitted uses, please contact [email protected]. Fulbright Summer Institute: Wales 2012 The Social Identity of Wales in Question: An Analysis of Culture, Language, and Identity in Cardiff, Bangor, and Aberystwyth Clara Martinez Reflective Journal Portfolio Fulbright Wales Summer Institute Professors August 3, 2012 Table of Contents Introduction -
SIRE DIRECTORY Welcome to the GENUS ABS BEEF DIRECTORY 2017 - 2018
2017 - 2018 BEEF SIRE DIRECTORY Welcome to the GENUS ABS BEEF DIRECTORY 2017 - 2018 CONTENTS SPECIALIST SYMBOLS PAGE PAGE BREED SIRE NAME BREED SIRE NAME NAME SYMBOL DEFINITION NO. NO. ANGUS Oakchurch DUSTER M109 8 SOUTH DEVON Foxhole MENZIES 41 Sire has at least Nightingale PLOUGHMAN 9 SOUTH DEVON Hawkley Poll INQUEST 41 120 calvings in 60 ROCK SOLID Netherton AMERICANO 10 SOUTH DEVON Hawkley SAS INTREPID 41 dairy herds, whose GENETICS Shadwell Jafar ERIC 11 DEVON Boskenna FERDINAND 42 performance has been ABS PROTEGE 306 12 SHORTHORN HW HAZARD 42 proven on dairy cows. Mosshall Red PHARAOH 12 WAGYU LONGFORD F E0241 42 Haymount WAR SMITH R578 12 SALER THEOREME 42 Sire has produced more BRITISH BLUE than 50,000 progeny Newpole HEARTTHROB 16 SUSSEX Friths GENERAL 42 SAPPHIRE SIRE Newpole EASY 17 to reach the acclaimed PARTHENAIS ATOMIC 43 Sapphire Sire status. Moorsley HERO 18 PARTHENAIS CAMBRIDGE 43 Greystone GOVERNOR 19 DEXTER Canwell SOOTY 43 Moorsley ANDERSON 20 LINCOLN RED Walmer PIPER 43 Sire has produced more Brookfield DEV 21 TH than 100,000 progeny WELSH BLACK Macreth BEDWYR 5 43 DIAMOND SIRE Rosemount HAL 22 to reach the legendary WELSH BLACK Tryfil CAWR 43 Redmires FREDDY 23 Diamond Sire status. MURRAY GREY Ashrose ZEBEDEE 44 Greystone JUPITER 24 BLACK GALLOWAY Blackcraig KODIAC 44 Greystone GLACIER 25 BLACK GALLOWAY Viscount of GLENTURK 44 Sire is eligible for royalty Moorsley DJ 25 BELTED GALLOWAY Cairnsmore FERGUS 44 ROYALTY fee to be paid to breeder Redmires ISAAC 25 HIGHLAND ALASDAIR 4th of Woodneuk 44 APPLICABLE or Genus ABS if progeny Rosemount IGGY 26 is registered as pedigree. -
DSV Spring Crop Plots
400 700 20 401 702 800 806 900 24 701 40 17 17 18 Lemken Harper Adams 807 20 Omex 501 Landquip Crop 15 15 1107 14 500 Househam Sprayers Ltd 802 804 University J Brock & Sons 901 1100 Alpler Agricultural Sprayers Billericay Farm 202 201QPH 203 9 10 10 Catering 2 100 Ltd 8 Altek-Lechler 8 8 8 Soil Association KRM Ltd Machinery LH Agro Services Griffith Elder 6 Shufflebottom 6 6 / Certification Microgenetics 10 108 54 36 36 36 280 600 425 216 135 360 300 375 330 64 56 225 150 300 160 120 260 102 18 9 6 6 6 20 25 25 27 15 20 25 22 8 7 15 15 20 15 26 13 18 12 40 10 12 120 12 12 15 10 40 1 101 204 2 205 402 3 403 502 4 503 704 5 6 809 902 7 903 1002 8 1003 1102 9 6 Creagh 6 Catering 3 17 Basak Concrete 10 10 10 10 Atlantis Tanks Products36 11 11 Barclays 12 12 Tractors Group Ltd 15 Strutt & Parker 15 15 15 16 Fruehauf 16 15 McConnel 15 905 15 McHale 15 Miedema 120 AHDB 100 143 6 Challow 6 20 Mercer 20 170 505 Chafer 144 Products 24 24 36 Machinery 103 207 Machinery 8 104 270 600 180 906 225 Isuzu Offroad Driving 6 Weirbags 6 Wilson 256 10 Extenda Line 10 907 60 60 6 10 10 402A 10 36 Wraight 706 54 206 9 9 1004 Course 7 Roythornes 7 504 150 12 12 200 105 80 Hugh Crane 106 Solicitors AHDB Pentair Terrington 77 15 15 45 45 10 (Cleaning 10 12 12 72 10 1005 507 Hypro EU 288 Machinery Tilhill 209 Spring Crop Plots - I Equipment) 96 12 12 6 6 Nuffield Forestry MHA MacIntyre Theatre 909 Farming 12 208 Hudson 100 100 42 72 811 908 10 15 15 Cleveland 14 14 10 CLA 10 600 508 Joskin SA 6 6 7 7 13 1006 72 708 Alliances 13 60 60 72 211 40 6 Sentry 6 Dual 36 NAAC Drainage Area 6 ODA UK 6 6 Pumps 6 42 107 150 36 Limited 10 108 Ltd 36 36 84 225 910 213 813 104 210 510 100 12 Fram Farmers 12 6 De Lacy 6 710 7 7 1007 Executive 509 911 Oil NRG 15 36 42 1008 Concept Karcher Farm 13 Lycetts 13 215 10 10 6 Miles 12 12 120 Drainage Machinery Centre JHS Team 912 Ltd 7 Laurence 7 1800 20 20 13 13 Ltd 36 2400 Gould 18 18 Sprayers 7 7 109 100 225 156 42 405 1010 72 1109 217 49 9 EPR Ely 9 511 110 216 MOBA 104 1009 6 Mobile 6 914 6 6 Landmark William Morfoot Eternit 7 72 R.A.B.I. -
Bovine TB Partnership Members List
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Bovine TB Partnership members biographies February 2021 Contents John Cross – Chair .............................................................................................................. 3 Members .............................................................................................................................. 3 Stephanie Young .............................................................................................................. 3 Paul Westaway (High Risk Area) ..................................................................................... 3 Di Wastenage (High Risk Area) ....................................................................................... 4 David Barton (High Risk Area) ......................................................................................... 4 Phil Latham (Edge Area) .................................................................................................. 4 Chris Addison (Low Risk Area) ........................................................................................ 4 Professor Rosie Woodroffe .............................................................................................. 5 Dr Sue Mayer ................................................................................................................... 5 Dr Andy Robertson ........................................................................................................... 5 Dr Gareth Enticott............................................................................................................ -
Understanding the an English Agribusiness Lobby Group
Understanding the NFU an English Agribusiness Lobby Group Ethical Consumer Research Association December 2016 Understanding the NFU - an English Agribusiness Lobby-group ECRA December 2016 1 Contents 1. Introduction – The NFU an English Agribusiness Lobby group 3 2. Economic Lobbying – undermining the smaller farmer 2.1 NFU and farm subsidies – promoting agribusiness at the expense of smaller farmers 11 2.2 NFU and TTIP – favouring free trade at the expense of smaller farms 15 2.3 NFU and supermarkets – siding with retailers and opposing the GCA 17 2.4 NFU and foot and mouth disease – exports prioritised over smaller producers 20 3. Environmental Lobbying – unconcerned about sustainability 3.1 NFU, bees and neonicotinoids – risking it all for a few pence more per acre 24 3.2 NFU and soil erosion – opposing formal protection 28 3.3 NFU and air pollution – opposing EU regulation 31 3.4 NFU, biodiversity and meadows – keeping the regulations away 33 3.5 NFU and Europe – keeping sustainability out of the CAP 41 3/6 NFU and climate change – a mixed response 47 3.7 NFU and flooding – not listening to the experts? 51 4. Animal interventions – keeping protection to a minimum 4.1 Farm animal welfare – favouring the megafarm 53 4.2 NFU, badgers and bovine TB – driving a cull in the face of scientific evidence 60 4.3 The Red Tractor label – keeping standards low 74 5. Social Lobbying – passing costs on to the rest of us 5.1 NFU and Organophosphates in sheep dip – failing to protect farmers’ health 78 5.2 NFU and road safety – opposing regulations 82 5.3 NFU and workers’ rights – opposing the Agricultural Wages Board 86 5.4 NFU and Biotechnology – Supporting GM crops 89 6. -
Opinion on Contingency Planning for Farm Animal Welfare in Disasters and Emergencies
Opinion on Contingency Planning for Farm Animal Welfare in Disasters and Emergencies March 2012 Farm Animal Welfare Committee, Area 8B, 9 Millbank, c/o Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London, SW1P 3JR. www.defra.gov.uk/fawc FAWC Opinions FAWC Opinions are short reports to Government1 on contemporary topics relating to farm animal welfare. They are based on evidence and consultation with interested parties. They may highlight particular concerns and indicate issues for further consideration. Opinions published by the Farm Animal Welfare Council Lameness in sheep, 2011 Mutilations and environmental enrichment in piglets and growing pigs, 2011 Osteoporosis and bone fractures in laying hens, 2010 The welfare of the dairy cow, 2009 Policy instruments for protecting and improving farm animal welfare, 2008 The welfare of farmed gamebirds, 2008 Enriched cages for laying hens, 2007 Beak trimming of laying hens, 2007 1 Where we refer to ―Government‖ we are addressing ourselves to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in England, the Scottish Government and the Welsh Government, and other responsible Government Departments and Agencies. Opinion on Contingency Planning for Farm Animal Welfare in Disasters and Emergencies Scope 1. This Opinion examines the potential impacts that disasters and emergencies can have on farm animal welfare and considers the implications for contingency planning to protect the welfare of farm animals. It covers all potential disaster and emergency scenarios, either natural or resulting from human actions, and applies to all farmed species (including fish) in Great Britain. 2. The aims are to: Identify a range of possible disaster and emergency scenarios for which contingency planning for farm animal welfare might be necessary, from farm-based emergencies to large-scale disasters. -
Feeding the Future Innovation Requirements for Primary Food Production in the UK to 2030
Feeding the Future Innovation Requirements for Primary Food Production in the UK to 2030 Prepared by the Joint Commissioning Group1 (Principal Editor Chris Pollock, Aberystwyth University) 1 Full details of the membership of the Joint Commissioning Group can be found in Appendix 1 www.feedingthefuture.info Feeding the Future – Innovation Requirements for Primary Food Production in the UK to 2030 Contents Foreword ...........................................................................................................................................................05 Summary of Research Priorities and Recommendations ..............................................06 Research Priorities ...................................................................................................................................... 07 Recommendations ..................................................................................................................................... 13 Next Steps ........................................................................................................................................................ 14 Feeding the Future Innovation Requirements for Primary Food Production in the UK to 2030 ......... 15 I. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 16 II. Information-gathering and Evaluation ...................................................................................... 21 III. Findings -
Inventory of Exchange Schemes for Young Farmers Annex II.1 to the Pilot Project: Exchange Programmes for Young Farmers
Inventory of exchange schemes for young farmers Annex II.1 to the Pilot project: Exchange programmes for young farmers Client: European Commission, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development Rotterdam, 25 September 2015 Inventory of exchange schemes for young farmers Annex II.1 to the Pilot project: Exchange programmes for young farmers Client: European Commission, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development Marie-Jose Zondag (Ecorys Netherlands) Carolien de Lauwere (LEI-Wageningen UR) Peter Sloot (Aequator Groen & Ruimte) Andreas Pauer (Ecorys Brussels) Rotterdam, 25 September 2015 Disclaimer: The information and views set out in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. About Ecorys At Ecorys we aim to deliver real benefit to society through the work we do. We offer research, consultancy and project management, specialising in economic, social and spatial development. Focusing on complex market, policy and management issues we provide our clients in the public, private and not-for-profit sectors worldwide with a unique perspective and high-value solutions. Ecorys’ remarkable history spans more than 85 years. Our expertise covers economy and competitiveness; regions, cities and real estate; energy and water; transport and mobility; social policy, education, health and governance. We value our independence, integrity and partnerships. Our staff comprises dedicated experts from academia and consultancy, who share best practices both within our company and with our partners internationally. -
Backing the Business of British Farming
BACKING THE BUSINESS OF BRITISH FARMING NFU Conference 2014 Welcome Welcome his is my eighth and final Conference as President and once again we have what I to the NFU Tbelieve is a conference that is both thought provoking and packed with speakers who are right at the heart of both British and global agriculture. Conference 2014 In that time we have seen such a monumental change in the attitude towards • The Conference Registration farming here in the UK that we have deliberately chosen a business theme this Desk is situated in the main year. ‘Backing the business of British farming’ highlights how, in the wake of last registration area where NFU year’s horsemeat scandal, we need to work tirelessly to get politicians, retailers and staff will be happy to help with consumers to Back British Farming’. any queries you may have during conference. Owen Paterson returns this year and is joined by the new farming Minister George Eustice. Political support for the badger cull by the Government has been superb, but as we all know there are • Conference badge – For your many ingredients to building a competitive business. It is just as vital that ministers battle for security please ensure that science-based decision making on crop protection products as well as delivery on better regulation. you wear your delegate badge at all times inside the Jim Rogers is the world renowned ex-partner of George Soros, a global investor who believes conference areas. agriculture is the ‘industry of the future’ and, living in Singapore, he brings a truly global perspective. -
Coordinating New Approaches to Watercourse Management in Rural Catchments Is There a Case for a New Internal Drainage Board in Oxfordshire?
Coordinating New Approaches to Watercourse Management in Rural Catchments Is there a Case for a New Internal Drainage Board in Oxfordshire? National Farmers Union South East May 2015 Page 1 NFU Report Abstract – Key Messages This report is the culmination of a 6-month study, presenting the results of a series of questionnaires, interviews and stakeholder engagement events focussing on the River Ray (Oxfordshire); a small rural catchment with frequent rural flooding problems. Our study indicates that there is already a strong commitment to maintenance spending in the River Ray catchment and that higher levels of maintenance spending are associated with more favourable attitudes towards environmental objectives (i.e. entry into agri-environment schemes, favouring sediment control and habitat creation). This indicates that enabling watercourse maintenance may also generate more positive environmental outcomes in rural catchments. Our data suggest that there is financial justification for creating a formalised management group as there is a substantial level of cumulative spending power within the catchment that could achieve outcomes that are not possible for individual holdings or landowners. We estimate a potential cumulative contribution from farmland in this catchment of up to £221,173 per year for watercourse maintenance. This figure excludes potential contributions from urban areas, which could be of a similar magnitude if raised through a drainage levy. The study has also shown that there is willingness to participate in a collaborative scheme, such as the creation of local management groups or the creation of a new internal drainage board. The creation of two new management groups in Oxfordshire during this project, as well as several already in existence demonstrate the willingness of local communities to come together to manage flood risk issues.