Prologue 1 the Genesis of Cassini-Huygens W.-H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prologue 1 the Genesis of Cassini-Huygens W.-H Prologue 1 The genesis of Cassini-Huygens w.-h. ip, t. owen, and d. gautier 1 Introduction: Titan viewed from Earth long that he had made with the help of his brother The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unrea- Constantjn, Jr. The objective lens was 2.24 inches in sonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. diameter with a focal length of 10.5 feet. This focal Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. length was required to overcome the chromatic aber- – George Bernard Shaw ration of the uncorrected lens. Using a magnification of 50, Huygens noticed a small “star” to the west of The exploration of the solar system has become an Saturn, and used another star in his field of view to important part of the glory and dreams of our civiliza- establish its location relative to the planet. The next tion. The study of the Saturnian system and Titan itself night he saw that the “star” had moved through the can be traced back more than 400 years to when Galileo sky with Saturn and realized that he had discovered the first pointed his telescope to the night sky to seek the planet’s first known satellite (Huygens, 1656; Alexan- mysteries of the universe. The Cassini-Huygens mis- der, 1962). He confirmed his discovery by watching sion represents the first time in human history that a the satellite move around the planet on subsequent spacecraft was sent to spend time in the Saturnian sys- nights, eventually determining its period of revolution.1 tem for close-up observations, bringing humanity to These must have been difficult observations, given the the surface of one of Saturn’s satellites. We believe that long focal length, small diameter, and mediocre quality this extraordinary achievement will be remembered as of the objective lens. The name “Titan” was given to a major milestone in planetary exploration 400 years this satellite in 1847 by Sir John Herschel (son of Sir from now. More than that, it is also the first plane- William, who had discovered Uranus). The Titans were tary science project of truly global scale, with scientists ancient deities who, together with a race of giants, were from three continents joining the effort. How did it defeated in battles with the Olympian gods when the come about? latter made their home in Greece.2 To begin, let us first summarize what we knew about Titan before the birth of the Cassini-Huygens mission. Comprehensive descriptions of Titan studies during the 1 With becoming modesty, Huygens (1689) described his discovery as far period from its discovery in 1655 to the landing of the less important than Galileo’s: Huygens probe in 2001 have been published by Fortes The moons about Jupiter, it is well known, we owe to Galileo, and any one may imagine he was in no small rapture at the discovery. The outermost (1997) and Coustenis et al. (2009). Here we simply but one and brightest of Saturn’s, it chanced to be my lot, with a telescope present a few highlights in chronological order. not less than 12 foot long to have the first sight of in the year 1655. 2 Classical scholars have suggested that the legendary battle between the Titans and giants with the Olympian gods symbolized the conquest of the indigenous people by the Greeks when they moved into the peninsula we 1655: discovery now call Greece. The legend tells us that the goddess Athena personally defeated the giant Enceladus and buried him in Sicily under the volcano we Christian Huygens discovered Titan on March 25, 1655, call Mt. Aetna. His struggles to get out of this grave caused the earthquakes and eruptions of this volcano, an astounding coincidence with the behavior when he was 26 years old. He used a telescope 12 feet of the satellite of Saturn that bears his name. 10 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. UCL, Institute of Education, on 09 Aug 2018 at 09:05:08, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667398.002 1 Introduction: Titan viewed from Earth 11 from a planetary atmosphere. He accepted the obser- vation that Titan had an atmosphere and pointed out that this was possible despite the satellite’s small mass because of its low temperature. 1943: an atmosphere! In 1943 Gerard P. Kuiper brought these hints, specula- tions, and predictions to an end when he discovered the 6190 A˚ and 7260 A˚ bands of CH4 in spectra of Titan he recorded on photographic plates at the McDonald Observatory in Texas (Kuiper, 1944). Kuiper was sys- tematically recording spectra of the outer planets and their satellites so it was easy for him to recognize the methane absorptions in Titan’s spectrum, given their prominence in the spectra of the outer planets. 1943–1993: These major milestones in the history of Figure 1 The hand-drawn picture of Titan by Joan Comas Titan observations were followed by 50 years of often Sola´ in 1907 displaying the limb-darkening effect. conflicting ideas and observations. We skip the details. 1908: an atmosphere? Titan is the only satellite in the solar system with a red-orange color. The cause of this color became In the course of a series of visual investigations of an interesting topic. Kuiper (1944) proposed that it the satellites of Jupiter and Saturn, the Catalonian was the result of a chemical interaction between the astronomer Comas Sola´ (1908) reported limb darkening atmosphere and the surface analogous to the surface on Titan that he interpreted as evidence for an atmo- oxidation of Mars. Polarization observations by Vev- sphere. Figure 1 shows the hand-drawn picture of Titan erka (1973) showed that the orange color of Titan must by Comas Sola.´ This observation remains controver- actually be in a thick cloud or haze layer, not on the sial, given that his drawing of Titan is unlike any image surface. Khare et al. (1984) proposed that the col- obtained by the Voy age r or Cassini-Huygens spacecraft. oration was caused by aerosols composed of a mixture The same must be said of later drawings of Titan made of complex organic molecules that indeed produced an by Lyot, Dollfus, and Camichel using a larger telescope orange color in laboratory experiments. Sagan coined at a better site (Alexander, 1962). Nevertheless, Comas the word tholins for such mixtures, from the Greek Sola´ opened the door to considerations that Titan might word θoλoζ , meaning muddy. These tholins must pre- 3 have an atmosphere. cipitate, forming deposits on the satellite’s surface that could have become several meters deep over 4.6 billion 1916: an atmosphere? years. Then there was the issue of the atmosphere itself. In his book The Dynamical Theory of Gases, Sir James What other gases might be present besides methane? Jeans (1954) investigated the thermal escape of gases Lewis (1971) was the first to propose that Titan might have an atmosphere of N2 produced by photolysis of 3 Comas Sola´ made many more accurate observations, among them the dis- covery of a comet now known as 32P/Comas Sola.´ In 1965, while inspect- ammonia. Atreya et al. (1978) proved that this was ing a photographic image of this comet recorded by S. Gerasimenko to indeed a viable process on Titan. This led to models improve its orbit, K. Churyumov discovered another comet. Their discov- ery is now the target of the ESA Rosetta mission. It is scheduled to orbit of thick nitrogen atmospheres, of which Hunten’s was and deploy a lander to inspect the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov- the most successful. Hunten (1978) postulated an atmo- Gerasimenko in 2015. So Comas Sola´ continues to stimulate planetary science. sphere of 20 bars, with a greenhouse effect that could Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. UCL, Institute of Education, on 09 Aug 2018 at 09:05:08, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667398.002 12 Prologue 1 The genesis of Cassini-Huygens produce a surface temperature of 200 K. However, the surface was finally sensed directly by Jaffe et al. (1979), who used the Very Large Array (VLA) of radio tele- scopes in New Mexico to obtain a surface temperature of only 87 ± 9K. Titan was clearly a world worthy of further explo- ration and the Voy age r encounters strongly reinforced this conclusion. 2 Titan viewed from space: Pioneer and Voyager Pioneer 11 was the first spacecraft to reach Saturn. A small, spinning spacecraft with a limited payload, it flew past the planet on September 1, 1979. Its most important findings for our story were a confirmation of Titan’s low temperature and verification that a safe passage existed through a gap in the rings. The big news about Titan came from the sophisti- cated, three-axis stabilized Voy age r spacecraft. As the Figure2TitanasseenbyVoy age r 1 . NASA/JPL Photo. Voy age r 1 spacecraft was approaching the Saturn sys- tem in November 1980, both Daniel Gautier and Toby Owen were onsite at JPL as members of the IR spec- to explore in detail the chemistry of its atmosphere trometer (IRIS) and imaging teams, respectively. With by means of in situ measurements and to investigate growing excitement, they watched closely the change the hidden surface. This required the launching of a of Titan’s image from a faint dot to a rounded sphere probe into the atmosphere of the satellite, accompa- surrounded by a yellow-orange smog that hid the sur- nied by radar and an infrared spectrometer that could face (see Figure 2).
Recommended publications
  • Planetary Science Division Status Report
    Planetary Science Division Status Report Jim Green NASA, Planetary Science Division January 26, 2017 Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory CommiBee Outline • Planetary Science ObjecFves • Missions and Events Overview • Flight Programs: – Discovery – New FronFers – Mars Programs – Outer Planets • Planetary Defense AcFviFes • R&A Overview • Educaon and Outreach AcFviFes • PSD Budget Overview New Horizons exploresPlanetary Science Pluto and the Kuiper Belt Ascertain the content, origin, and evoluFon of the Solar System and the potenFal for life elsewhere! 01/08/2016 As the highest resolution images continue to beam back from New Horizons, the mission is onto exploring Kuiper Belt Objects with the Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) camera from unique viewing angles not visible from Earth. New Horizons is also beginning maneuvers to be able to swing close by a Kuiper Belt Object in the next year. Giant IcebergsObjecve 1.5.1 (water blocks) floatingObjecve 1.5.2 in glaciers of Objecve 1.5.3 Objecve 1.5.4 Objecve 1.5.5 hydrogen, mDemonstrate ethane, and other frozenDemonstrate progress gasses on the Demonstrate Sublimation pitsDemonstrate from the surface ofDemonstrate progress Pluto, potentially surface of Pluto.progress in in exploring and progress in showing a geologicallyprogress in improving active surface.in idenFfying and advancing the observing the objects exploring and understanding of the characterizing objects The Newunderstanding of Horizons missionin the Solar System to and the finding locaons origin and evoluFon in the Solar System explorationhow the chemical of Pluto wereunderstand how they voted the where life could of life on Earth to that pose threats to and physical formed and evolve have existed or guide the search for Earth or offer People’sprocesses in the Choice for Breakthrough of thecould exist today life elsewhere resources for human Year forSolar System 2015 by Science Magazine as exploraon operate, interact well as theand evolve top story of 2015 by Discover Magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Visit the National Academies Press Online, the Authoritative Source
    Assessment of the CRAF and Cassini Science Missions: Letter Report Committee on Planetary and Lunar Exploration, Space Science Board, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Resources, National Research Council ISBN: 0-309-12299-6, 7 pages, 8 1/2 x 11, (1988) This free PDF was downloaded from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12334.html Visit the National Academies Press online, the authoritative source for all books from the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council: • Download hundreds of free books in PDF • Read thousands of books online, free • Sign up to be notified when new books are published • Purchase printed books • Purchase PDFs • Explore with our innovative research tools Thank you for downloading this free PDF. If you have comments, questions or just want more information about the books published by the National Academies Press, you may contact our customer service department toll-free at 888-624-8373, visit us online, or send an email to [email protected]. This free book plus thousands more books are available at http://www.nap.edu. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for noncommercial, educational purposes, provided that this notice appears on the reproduced materials, the Web address of the online, full authoritative version is retained, and copies are not altered. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the National Academies Press. Space Studies Board Jump to Search: Top NewsJump to Science in the Subscribe to our FREE e- Headlines newsletter! NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL June 18, 2004 Current Operating Status Assessment of the CRAF and Cassini Science Missions: Letter Report http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12334.html On September 1, 1988, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis Radiation Environment
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20070014073 2019-08-30T00:44:36+00:00Z 1 Source of Acquisition NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Genesis Radiation Environment Joseph I. Minow* NASA Marshull Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 USA Richard L. Altstatt' and William C. Skipworth* Jacobs Engineering, Marshall Space Flight Center Group, Huntsville, AL 35812 USA The Genesis spacecraft launched on 8 August 2001 sampled solar wind environments at L1 from 2001 to 2004. After the Science Capsule door was opened, numerous foils and samples were exposed to the various solar wind environments during periods including slow solar wind from the streamer belts, fast solar wind flows from coronal holes, and coronal mass ejections. The Survey and Examination of Eroded Returned Surfaces (SEERS) program led by NASA's Space Environments and Effects program had initiated access for the space materials community to the remaining Science Capsule hardware after the science samples had been removed for evaluation of materials exposure to the space environment. This presentation will describe the process used to generate a reference radiation Genesis Radiation Environment developed for the SEERS program for use by the materials science community in their analyses of the Genesis hardware. I. Introduction ASA's Space Environments and Effects (SEE) Program initiated the Surveying and Examination of Eroded N Returned Surfaces (SEERS) Initiative in 2003. The goal of the Initiative was to provide leadership in the engineering analysis of returned flight hardware by supporting a comprehensive effort to understand environmental effects due to solar W, ionizing radiation, plasmas, neutral contamination, meteoroids, and other conditions experienced during the mission (not primary science mission objectives).
    [Show full text]
  • The Mars 2001 Odyssey and the "Autogen" Process
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@USU AUTOGEN: The Mars 2001 Odyssey and the "Autogen" Process By Roy Gladden June 6, 2002 Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Abstract In many deep space and interplanetary missions, it is widely recognized that the scheduling of many commands to operate a spacecraft can follow very regular patterns. In these instances, it is greatly desired to convert the knowledge of how commands are scheduled into algorithms in order to automate the development of command sequences. In doing so, it is possible to dramatically reduce the number of people and work-hours that are required to develop a sequence. The development of the "autogen" process for the Mars 2001 Odyssey spacecraft is one implementation of this concept. It combines robust scheduling algorithms with software that is compatible with pre- existing "uplink" software, and literally reduced the duration of some sequence generation processes from weeks to minutes. This paper outlines the "autogen" tools and processes and describes how they have been implemented for the various phases of the Mars 2001 Odyssey mission. What is autogen? manually building the commands for lengthy and well- understood command sequences, efforts were made to The term "autogen" is applied in two different ways. develop software that would automatically schedule the First, "autogen," in its broadest sense, identifies a commands given certain input data. By taking the process that may be used to automatically generate knowledge for how commands were to be scheduled sequences for a spacecraft and, second, it is a Solaris and writing algorithms to replicate that knowledge, it script that has been used to facilitate this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Stardust Sample Return
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Stardust Sample Return Press Kit January 2006 www.nasa.gov Contacts Merrilee Fellows Policy/Program Management (818) 393-0754 NASA Headquarters, Washington DC Agle Stardust Mission (818) 393-9011 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. Vince Stricherz Science Investigation (206) 543-2580 University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. Contents General Release ............................................................................................................... 3 Media Services Information ……………………….................…………….................……. 5 Quick Facts …………………………………………..................………....…........…....….. 6 Mission Overview …………………………………….................……….....……............…… 7 Recovery Timeline ................................................................................................ 18 Spacecraft ………………………………………………..................…..……...........……… 20 Science Objectives …………………………………..................……………...…..........….. 28 Why Stardust?..................…………………………..................………….....………............... 31 Other Comet Missions .......................................................................................... 33 NASA's Discovery Program .................................................................................. 36 Program/Project Management …………………………........................…..…..………...... 40 1 2 GENERAL RELEASE: NASA PREPARES FOR RETURN OF INTERSTELLAR CARGO NASA’s Stardust mission is nearing Earth after a 2.88 billion mile round-trip journey
    [Show full text]
  • The Messenger Sept. 8Th GENESIS SUNDAY
    WHAT’S INSIDE: Stewardship and Finance……...pg. 2 Congregational News…………... pg. 3 Celebrating Lohmen……………..pg. 4 Adult Education…………………...pg. 5 Faith Through the Generations….pgs. 6-7 Community Events…………..pgs. 8-9 WPC Food Pantry………………..pg. 10 The Messenger Prayer Ministry & Groups…….pg. 11 Environmental Stewardship...pg. 12 VOLUME 89, ISSUE 8 Confirmation Class……………...pg. 12 AUGUST 2019 Sept. 8th GENESIS SUNDAY Bring the whole family and invite a friend for a day full of food, games, live music, and lots of wild surprises! 2 CONGREGATIONAL NEWS The Pastor Nominating Committee Report (PNC) Nine members of the congregation were nominated and elected to serve on the Pastor Nominating Committee (PNC). They are: Andrew Finkner, Michael Gregg, Steve Hughes, Jim Kinkennon, Sandi Larson, Deb Schorr, Alisha Stokes, Allen Wachter and Joyce Douglas, Moderator. These members represent the whole congregation and have the responsibility for nominating an individual to present to the congregation to serve as our Head of Staff. In the future months, the PNC will journey through the search process seeking to hear the call of Christ. The first step will be to review the documentation from our group meetings held last Fall which represents the needs of Westminster and then complete the Ministry Information Form. The PNC has received reading materials already and will begin meeting together in early August. The PNC plans to keep the congregation informed on the status of this search. Our journey begins……… Joyce Douglas, Moderator LOOKING AHEAD Sun. August 4th—Celebrating Lohmen, our sister church in Germany (after worship, meet in chancel) Tues., Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Titan and Enceladus $1 B Mission
    JPL D-37401 B January 30, 2007 Titan and Enceladus $1B Mission Feasibility Study Report Prepared for NASA’s Planetary Science Division Prepared By: Kim Reh Contributing Authors: John Elliott Tom Spilker Ed Jorgensen John Spencer (Southwest Research Institute) Ralph Lorenz (The Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory) KSC GSFC ARC Approved By: _________________________________ Kim Reh Dr. Ralph Lorenz Jet Propulsion Laboratory The Johns Hopkins University, Applied Study Manager Physics Laboratory Titan Science Lead _________________________________ Dr. John Spencer Southwest Research Institute Enceladus Science Lead Pre-decisional — For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Titan and Enceladus Feasibility Study Report Table of Contents JPL D-37401 B The following members of an Expert Advisory and Review Board contributed to ensuring the consistency and quality of the study results through a comprehensive review and advisory process and concur with the results herein. Name Title/Organization Concurrence Chief Engineer/JPL Planetary Flight Projects Gentry Lee Office Duncan MacPherson JPL Review Fellow Glen Fountain NH Project Manager/JHU-APL John Niehoff Sr. Research Engineer/SAIC Bob Pappalardo Planetary Scientist/JPL Torrence Johnson Chief Scientist/JPL i Pre-decisional — For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Titan and Enceladus Feasibility Study Report Table of Contents JPL D-37401 B This page intentionally left blank ii Pre-decisional — For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Titan and Enceladus Feasibility Study Report Table of Contents JPL D-37401 B Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Study Objectives and Guidelines............................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Relation to Cassini-Huygens, New Horizons and Juno.......................................... 1-1 1.3 Technical Approach...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis Sample Return
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Genesis Sample Return Press Kit September 2004 Media Contacts Donald Savage Policy/program management 202/358-1727 Headquarters, [email protected] Washington, D.C. DC Agle Genesis mission 818/393-9011 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, [email protected] Pasadena, Calif. Robert Tindol Principal investigator 626/395-3631 California Institute of Technology [email protected] Pasadena, Calif. Contents General Release ……................……………………………….........................………..……....… 3 Media Services Information …………………………….........................................………..…….... 5 Quick Facts…………………………………………………….......................................………....…. 6 Mysteries of the Solar Nebula ........………...…………………………......................................……7 Solar Studies Past and Present ...................................................................................... 8 NASA's Discovery Program .......................................................................................... 10 Mission Overview….………...…………...…………………………....................................…….... 12 Mid-Air Retrievals........................................................................................................... 14 Sample Return Missions ................................................................................................ 15 Spacecraft ………………………………………………………………......................................…. 26 Science Objectives ………………………………………………………....................................…. 33 The Solar Corona and
    [Show full text]
  • The Planetary Report) Watching As a Bust
    The Board of Dlrec:tolll The naming of comets can, indeed, be a very difficult matter. Traditionally these small, CARL SAGAN BRUCE MURRAY President Vice President icy solar system bodies were named for their discoverers. But because some people are Director" Laboratory Professor of Planetary very persistent (for example, there are four Comets Meier) a particular name is needed for Planetary Studies. Science, California Camell University Institute of Technology for each individu.al comet. Thus, at discovery a comet is assigned a letter designation LOUIS FRIEDMAN HENRY TANNER based on the order of discovery or recovery in a certain year. So, Comet 1982i was the Executive Director Corporate Secretary and 9th comet found in 1982. Later, comets are assigned new names based on their peri­ Assistant Treasurer, Cafifom;a THOMAS O. PAINE Institute of Technology helion (closest approach to the Sun). 1984 XXll1 was the 23rd comet to pass perihelion Former Administrator. NASA: Chairman, National JOSEPH RYAN in 1984. Confused? Here is a poetic attempt to explain. Commission on Space O'Melveny & Myers Board of Advlsolll DIANE ACKERMAN GARRY E. HUNT poet and author Space -Scientist, THE NAMING OF COMETS (With apologies to T. S. Eliot) United Kingdom ISAAC ASIMOV aulhor HANS MARK BY DAVID H. LEW Chancellor, RICHARD BERENDZEN University of Texas System Presid8nt, American University JAMES MICHENER The naming of Comets is a difficult matter, JACQUES BLAMONT author Chief Scien#st, Centre National It isn't just one of your holiday games; d'Etudes Spatlales, France PHILIP MORRISON Institute Professor, You may think at first I'm mad as a hatter RAY BRADBURY Massachusetts poet and author Institute of Technofogy When I tell you, a comet has THREE DIFFERENT NAMES.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Sets Sights on Asteroid Exploration : Nature News & Comment
    NASA sets sights on asteroid exploration Agency plans to launch a mission to visit the Trojan asteroids in 2021, and one to the metallic asteroid Psyche in 2023. Alexandra Witze 04 January 2017 NASA/JPL-Caltech An artist’s conception of the Psyche spacecraft, which will explore a metallic asteroid. NASA will send two spacecraft to explore asteroids in the hopes of revealing new information about the Solar System’s origins. Psyche will journey to what could be the metallic heart of a failed planet and Lucy will investigate the Trojan asteroids near Jupiter. The missions, announced on 4 January, are part of NASA’s Discovery Program for planetary exploration. They were shortlisted by NASA in September 2015 and have survived a final cut that eliminated two proposed missions to Venus — which has not seen a US planetary mission since Magellan launched in 1989. “What can I say? It’s deeply disappointing,” says Robert Grimm, a planetary scientist at the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, and chairman of a group that analyses Venus issues for NASA. “We want to make sure NASA continues to support high-level Venus activities.” Scheduled to launch in October 2021 and arrive at its first major target in 2027, Lucy will explore six of Jupiter’s Trojan asteroids, which are trapped in orbits ahead of and behind the giant planet. Named after the famous hominid fossil, the spacecraft will investigate the origins of the giant planets by looking at the fragments left over from their formation. “These small bodies really are the fossils of planet formation,” said Lucy principal investigator Hal Levison of the Southwest Research Institute, at a media teleconference.
    [Show full text]
  • Dawn Mission to Vesta and Ceres Symbiosis Between Terrestrial Observations and Robotic Exploration
    Earth Moon Planet (2007) 101:65–91 DOI 10.1007/s11038-007-9151-9 Dawn Mission to Vesta and Ceres Symbiosis between Terrestrial Observations and Robotic Exploration C. T. Russell Æ F. Capaccioni Æ A. Coradini Æ M. C. De Sanctis Æ W. C. Feldman Æ R. Jaumann Æ H. U. Keller Æ T. B. McCord Æ L. A. McFadden Æ S. Mottola Æ C. M. Pieters Æ T. H. Prettyman Æ C. A. Raymond Æ M. V. Sykes Æ D. E. Smith Æ M. T. Zuber Received: 21 August 2007 / Accepted: 22 August 2007 / Published online: 14 September 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract The initial exploration of any planetary object requires a careful mission design guided by our knowledge of that object as gained by terrestrial observers. This process is very evident in the development of the Dawn mission to the minor planets 1 Ceres and 4 Vesta. This mission was designed to verify the basaltic nature of Vesta inferred both from its reflectance spectrum and from the composition of the howardite, eucrite and diogenite meteorites believed to have originated on Vesta. Hubble Space Telescope observations have determined Vesta’s size and shape, which, together with masses inferred from gravitational perturbations, have provided estimates of its density. These investigations have enabled the Dawn team to choose the appropriate instrumentation and to design its orbital operations at Vesta. Until recently Ceres has remained more of an enigma. Adaptive-optics and HST observations now have provided data from which we can begin C. T. Russell (&) IGPP & ESS, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567, USA e-mail: [email protected] F.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA and Planetary Exploration
    **EU5 Chap 2(263-300) 2/20/03 1:16 PM Page 263 Chapter Two NASA and Planetary Exploration by Amy Paige Snyder Prelude to NASA’s Planetary Exploration Program Four and a half billion years ago, a rotating cloud of gaseous and dusty material on the fringes of the Milky Way galaxy flattened into a disk, forming a star from the inner- most matter. Collisions among dust particles orbiting the newly-formed star, which humans call the Sun, formed kilometer-sized bodies called planetesimals which in turn aggregated to form the present-day planets.1 On the third planet from the Sun, several billions of years of evolution gave rise to a species of living beings equipped with the intel- lectual capacity to speculate about the nature of the heavens above them. Long before the era of interplanetary travel using robotic spacecraft, Greeks observing the night skies with their eyes alone noticed that five objects above failed to move with the other pinpoints of light, and thus named them planets, for “wan- derers.”2 For the next six thousand years, humans living in regions of the Mediterranean and Europe strove to make sense of the physical characteristics of the enigmatic planets.3 Building on the work of the Babylonians, Chaldeans, and Hellenistic Greeks who had developed mathematical methods to predict planetary motion, Claudius Ptolemy of Alexandria put forth a theory in the second century A.D. that the planets moved in small circles, or epicycles, around a larger circle centered on Earth.4 Only partially explaining the planets’ motions, this theory dominated until Nicolaus Copernicus of present-day Poland became dissatisfied with the inadequacies of epicycle theory in the mid-sixteenth century; a more logical explanation of the observed motions, he found, was to consider the Sun the pivot of planetary orbits.5 1.
    [Show full text]