DOCSLIB.ORG

C374 Official Journal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
C374 Official Journal Official Journal C 374 of the European Union Volume 63 English edition Information and Notices 5 November 2020 Contents II Information INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES European Commission 2020/C 374/01 Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10003 — Alcentra/Brait/New Look Retail Holdings) (1) . 1 IV Notices NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES European Commission 2020/C 374/02 Euro exchange rates — 4 November 2020 . 2 NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA EFTA Surveillance Authority 2020/C 374/03 State aid – Decision to raise no objections . 3 2020/C 374/04 State aid – Decision to raise no objections . 4 2020/C 374/05 State aid – Decision to raise no objections . 5 EEA Joint Committee 2020/C 374/06 Decisions of the EEA Joint Committee for which the constitutional requirements under Article 103 of the EEA Agreement have been fulfilled in 2019 and related Decisions . 6 EN (1) Text with EEA relevance. V Announcements COURT PROCEEDINGS EFTA Court 2020/C 374/07 Judgment of the Court of 16 July 2020 in Case E-7/19 Tak – Malbik ehf. v the Icelandic Road and Coastal Administration and Þróttur ehf. (Public Procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Public works contract – Public service contract) . 44 2020/C 374/08 Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Norges Høyesterett dated 30 June 2020 in criminal proceedings against N (Case E-8/20) . 45 2020/C 374/09 Judgment of the Court of 16 July 2020 in Case E-8/19 Scanteam AS v The Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Definition of ‘contracting authority’ – Foreign mission of an EFTA State – Applicability of EEA law – Article 126 EEA – Geographic scope of the EEA Agreement) . 47 OTHER ACTS European Commission 2020/C 374/10 Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 . 48 5.11.2020 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union C 374/1 II (Information) INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES EUROPEAN COMMISSION Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10003 — Alcentra/Brait/New Look Retail Holdings) (Text with EEA relevance) (2020/C 374/01) On 30 October 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available: — in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, — in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10003. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1. C 374/2 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 5.11.2020 IV (Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES EUROPEAN COMMISSION Euro exchange rates (1) 4 November 2020 (2020/C 374/02) 1 euro = Currency Exchange rate Currency Exchange rate USD US dollar 1,1721 CAD Canadian dollar 1,5411 JPY Japanese yen 122,31 HKD Hong Kong dollar 9,0872 DKK Danish krone 7,4466 NZD New Zealand dollar 1,7541 GBP Pound sterling 0,89954 SGD Singapore dollar 1,5926 KRW South Korean won 1 327,24 SEK Swedish krona 10,3520 ZAR South African rand 18,8090 CHF Swiss franc 1,0675 CNY Chinese yuan renminbi 7,8038 ISK Iceland króna 164,10 HRK Croatian kuna 7,5530 NOK Norwegian krone 10,9583 IDR Indonesian rupiah 16 892,54 BGN Bulgarian lev 1,9558 MYR Malaysian ringgit 4,8853 CZK Czech koruna 26,781 PHP Philippine peso 56,717 HUF Hungarian forint 362,42 RUB Russian rouble 92,4670 PLN Polish zloty 4,5368 THB Thai baht 36,370 RON Romanian leu 4,8675 BRL Brazilian real 6,6760 TRY Turkish lira 9,9037 MXN Mexican peso 24,6474 AUD Australian dollar 1,6346 INR Indian rupee 87,1955 (1) Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB. 5.11.2020 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union C 374/3 NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY State aid – Decision to raise no objections (2020/C 374/03) The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure: Date of adoption of the decision 20 July 2020 Case No 85362 Decision No 094/20/COL EFTA State Norway Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) COVID-19 Compensation scheme for operators of year- round, commercial, long-distance scheduled bus or passen­ ger boat services Legal basis The regulation on a temporary compensation scheme for operators of commercial bus and passenger boat routes with a loss in turnover caused by the COVID-19 outbreak Type of measure Scheme Objective To compensate beneficiaries for damages caused by the COVID-19 outbreak and the Norwegian authorities infection control measures, in order to ensure the continuity of year- round, commercial, long-distance bus and passenger boat services that do not receive compensation from local or other public authorities for public services obligations Form of aid Direct grants Budget NOK 100 million Duration 1.6.2020 – 31.8.2020 Economic sectors Land and sea transport sectors Name and address of the granting authority The Norwegian Railway Directorate Jernbanedirektoratet Postboks 16 Sentrum 0101 Oslo NORWAY The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/ C 374/4 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 5.11.2020 State aid – Decision to raise no objections (2020/C 374/04) The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure: Date of adoption of the decision 17 July 2020 Case No 85378 Decision No 093/20/COL EFTA State Norway Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) The Full-Scale CCS Project Legal basis Support Agreements between the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy and Norcem AS, Fortum Oslo Varme AS and North­ ern Lights Type of measure Individual aid Objective Environmental protection Form of aid Direct grant Budget Investment aid (P85 estimate): Fortum Oslo Varme AS: NOK 4 365 million Norcem AS: NOK 3 141 million Northern Lights: NOK 8 169 million Operating aid (P85 estimate): Fortum Oslo Varme AS: NOK 2 225 million Norcem AS: NOK 1 172 million Northern Lights: NOK 4 429 million Intensity >100 % Duration Until 2034 (estimate) Economic sectors Production of electricity, Steam and air conditioning supply, Extraction of crude petroleum and natural gas, Manufacture of refined petroleum products, Manufacture of articles of concrete, cement and plaster Name and address of the granting authority Ministry of Petroleum and Energy Postboks 8148 Dep N-0033 Oslo NORWAY The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/ 5.11.2020 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union C 374/5 State aid – Decision to raise no objections (2020/C 374/05) The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure: Date of adoption of the decision 20 July 2020 Case No 85113 Decision No 095/20/COL EFTA State Norway Title COVID-19 – Increased initial depreciation for investments in assets in Asset Group D Legal basis Act No 14, 26.3.1999 (the Tax Act), as amended by Amendment 143 (2019-2020) Type of measure Scheme Objective To alleviate the liquidity shortage faced by many undertakings and provide a broad stimulus to the economy Form of aid Tax advantage Budget NOK 1 200 million Intensity 0,48 % Duration 20 July 2020 – 31 December 2020 Economic sectors All sectors that invest in assets in Asset Group D Name and address of the granting authority The Norwegian Tax Administration Postboks 9200, Grønland 0134 Oslo NORWAY The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/ C 374/6 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 5.11.2020 EEA JOINT COMMITTEE Decisions of the EEA Joint Committee for which the constitutional requirements under Article 103 of the EEA Agreement have been fulfilled in 2019 and related Decisions (2020/C 374/06) Since March 2000, Decisions of the EEA Joint Committee indicate in a footnote whether their date of entry into force depends on the fulfilment of constitutional requirements by any of the Contracting Parties. Such requirements were notified as regards the Decisions listed below. The Contracting Parties in question have now notified the other Contracting Parties that they have completed their internal procedures. The dates of entry into force of the Decisions are as indicated. In addition, certain Decisions of the EEA Joint Committee can only enter into force upon the fulfilment of constitutional requirements of the above-mentioned Decisions and are also listed Decision Date of entry Date of adoption Publication reference Legal act(s) integrated number into force 195/2015 10.7.2015 OJ L 8, 12.1.2017, p.32 Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament 1.4.2019 and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electri­ EEA Supplement No 3 cal and electronic equipment (WEEE) (recast) 12 January 2017, p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Determining the Classification of Vine Varieties Has Become Difficult to Understand Because of the Large Whereas Article 31
    31 . 12 . 81 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 381 / 1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC) No 3800/81 of 16 December 1981 determining the classification of vine varieties THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Whereas Commission Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/ 70 ( 4), as last amended by Regulation ( EEC) No 591 /80 ( 5), sets out the classification of vine varieties ; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Whereas the classification of vine varieties should be substantially altered for a large number of administrative units, on the basis of experience and of studies concerning suitability for cultivation; . Having regard to Council Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 of 5 February 1979 on the common organization of the Whereas the provisions of Regulation ( EEC) market in wine C1), as last amended by Regulation No 2005/70 have been amended several times since its ( EEC) No 3577/81 ( 2), and in particular Article 31 ( 4) thereof, adoption ; whereas the wording of the said Regulation has become difficult to understand because of the large number of amendments ; whereas account must be taken of the consolidation of Regulations ( EEC) No Whereas Article 31 of Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 816/70 ( 6) and ( EEC) No 1388/70 ( 7) in Regulations provides for the classification of vine varieties approved ( EEC) No 337/79 and ( EEC) No 347/79 ; whereas, in for cultivation in the Community ; whereas those vine view of this situation, Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/70 varieties
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Grapes in Missouri
    MS-29 June 2003 GrowingGrowing GrapesGrapes inin MissouriMissouri State Fruit Experiment Station Missouri State University-Mountain Grove Growing Grapes in Missouri Editors: Patrick Byers, et al. State Fruit Experiment Station Missouri State University Department of Fruit Science 9740 Red Spring Road Mountain Grove, Missouri 65711-2999 http://mtngrv.missouristate.edu/ The Authors John D. Avery Patrick L. Byers Susanne F. Howard Martin L. Kaps Laszlo G. Kovacs James F. Moore, Jr. Marilyn B. Odneal Wenping Qiu José L. Saenz Suzanne R. Teghtmeyer Howard G. Townsend Daniel E. Waldstein Manuscript Preparation and Layout Pamela A. Mayer The authors thank Sonny McMurtrey and Katie Gill, Missouri grape growers, for their critical reading of the manuscript. Cover photograph cv. Norton by Patrick Byers. The viticulture advisory program at the Missouri State University, Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center offers a wide range of services to Missouri grape growers. For further informa- tion or to arrange a consultation, contact the Viticulture Advisor at the Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center, 9740 Red Spring Road, Mountain Grove, Missouri 65711- 2999; telephone 417.547.7508; or email the Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center at [email protected]. Information is also available at the website http://www.mvec-usa.org Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2 Considerations in Planning a Vineyard ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Viticultural Regions and Suggested Cultivars S
    HO-88 Kentucky Viticultural Regions and Suggested Cultivars S. Kaan Kurtural and Patsy E. Wilson, Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky; Imed E. Dami, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University rapes grown in Kentucky are sub- usually more harmful to grapevines than Even in established fruit growing areas, ject to environmental stresses that steady cool temperatures. temperatures occasionally reach critical reduceG crop yield and quality, and injure Mesoclimate is the climate of the vine- levels and cause significant damage. The and kill grapevines. Damaging critical yard site affected by its local topography. moderate hardiness of grapes increases winter temperatures, late spring frosts, The topography of a given site, including the likelihood for damage since they are short growing seasons, and extreme the absolute elevation, slope, aspect, and the most cold-sensitive of the temperate summer temperatures all occur with soils, will greatly affect the suitability of fruit crops. regularity in regions of Kentucky. How- a proposed site. Mesoclimate is much Freezing injury, or winterkill, oc- ever, despite the challenging climate, smaller in area than macroclimate. curs as a result of permanent parts of certain species and cultivars of grapes Microclimate is the environment the grapevine being damaged by sub- are grown commercially in Kentucky. within and around the canopy of the freezing temperatures. This is different The aim of this bulletin is to describe the grapevine. It is described by the sunlight from spring freeze damage that kills macroclimatic features affecting grape exposure, air temperature, wind speed, emerged shoots and flower buds. Thus, production that should be evaluated in and wetness of leaves and clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • Matching Grape Varieties to Sites Are Hybrid Varieties Right for Oklahoma?
    Matching Grape Varieties to Sites Are hybrid varieties right for Oklahoma? Bruce Bordelon Purdue University Wine Grape Team 2014 Oklahoma Grape Growers Workshop 2006 survey of grape varieties in Oklahoma: Vinifera 80%. Hybrids 15% American 7% Muscadines 1% Profiles and Challenges…continued… • V. vinifera cultivars are the most widely grown in Oklahoma…; however, observation and research has shown most European cultivars to be highly susceptible to cold damage. • More research needs to be conducted to elicit where European cultivars will do best in Oklahoma. • French-American hybrids are good alternatives due to their better cold tolerance, but have not been embraced by Oklahoma grape growers... Reasons for this bias likely include hybrid cultivars being perceived as lower quality than European cultivars, lack of knowledge of available hybrid cultivars, personal preference, and misinformation. Profiles and Challenges…continued… • The unpredictable continental climate of Oklahoma is one of the foremost obstacles for potential grape growers. • It is essential that appropriate site selection be done prior to planting. • Many locations in Oklahoma are unsuitable for most grapes, including hybrids and American grapes. • Growing grapes in Oklahoma is a risky endeavor and minimization of potential loss by consideration of cultivar and environmental interactions is paramount to ensure long-term success. • There are areas where some European cultivars may succeed. • Many hybrid and American grapes are better suited for most areas of Oklahoma than
    [Show full text]
  • Grape Varieties for Indiana
    Commercial • HO-221-W Grape Varieties for Indiana COMMERCIAL HORTICULTURE • DEPARTMENT OF HORTICULTURE PURDUE UNIVERSITY COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE • WEST LAFAYETTE, IN Bruce Bordelon Selection of the proper variety is a major factor for fungal diseases than that of Concord (Table 1). Catawba successful grape production in Indiana. Properly match- also experiences foliar injury where ozone pollution ing the variety to the climate of the vineyard site is occurs. This grape is used primarily in white or pink necessary for consistent production of high quality dessert wines, but it is also used for juice production and grapes. Grape varieties fall into one of three groups: fresh market sales. This grape was widely grown in the American, French-American hybrids, and European. Cincinnati area during the mid-1800’s. Within each group are types suited for juice and wine or for fresh consumption. American and French-American Niagara is a floral, strongly labrusca flavored white grape hybrid varieties are suitable for production in Indiana. used for juice, wine, and fresh consumption. It ranks The European, or vinifera varieties, generally lack the below Concord in cold hardiness and ripens somewhat necessary cold hardiness to be successfully grown in earlier. On favorable sites, yields can equal or surpass Indiana except on the very best sites. those of Concord. Acidity is lower than for most other American varieties. The first section of this publication discusses American, French-American hybrids, and European varieties of wine Other American Varieties grapes. The second section discusses seeded and seedless table grape varieties. Included are tables on the best adapted varieties for Indiana and their relative Delaware is an early-ripening red variety with small berries, small clusters, and a mild American flavor.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Commercial Wine Grapes in Nebraska (G2289)
    NebGuide Nebraska Extension Research-Based Information That You Can Use G2289 · Index: Crops, Crop Production Issued July 2017 Growing Commercial Wine Grapes in Nebraska Paul E. Read, Extension Horticulturist and Professor of Horticulture Stephen J. Gamet, Research Technologist In recent years, interest in grape production and win- ery development has increased tremendously in Nebraska and the Midwest. This increased interest has led to a need for detailed information on vineyard establishment and commercial grape production. A successful winery must have a ready source of consistently high- quality fruit that is available every year. Fortunately for Nebraska growers, many locations through- out the state provide the essential resources of quality soil, water, and abundant sunshine. The experience of growers and University of Nebraska– Lincoln research have demon- strated that many sites are suitable for growing grapes of excellent quality that can be finished into wines of excep- tional quality. Do your homework: Before embarking upon the Figure 1. Sloping sites facilitate air drainage since cold air is heavier potentially risky venture of growing grapes for wine than warm air and flows downhill (air drainage). production, garner as much information as you can. Read trade journals and research articles. Attend grower work- shops and conferences, and visit other growers’ vineyards selection is probably the most frequent cause of vineyard to discuss these growers’ approaches and learn from their failure. In the Midwest, three main factors are critical to experiences. Focus your research on Midwest regional the selection of a vineyard site: Cold temperatures, air resources, ask questions, and study some more. movement, and soil drainage.
    [Show full text]
  • Wine Grapes for New York's North Country
    Research News from Cornell’s Viticulture and Enology Program Research Focus 2017-2 Research Focus Wine Grapes for New York's North Country: The Willsboro Cold Climate Variety Trial Anna Wallis1, Tim Martinson2, Lindsey Pashow3, Richard Lamoy4, and Kevin Lungerman3 1Eastern NY Commercial Horticulture Program, Cornell Cooperative Extension, Plattsburg, NY 2Section of Horticulture, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, NYS Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY 3Harvest NY, Cornell Coop. Extension 4Hid-In-Pines Vineyard, Morrisonville, NY Key Concepts • Cold-climate grape & wine production is a new industry in the North Country of New York, made possible by cold-climate variet- ies introduced in the mid-1990s. • Twenty-four varieties were evaluated over seven years at the Cornell Willsboro Re- search Farm in NY for their suitability to the North Country of NY. • All varieties survived winters with no vine February 2015. Research vineyard at the Cornell Willsboro Research Farm during mortality or trunk injury and only modest dormant pruning. Photo by Anna Wallis bud injury. • Yields were economically viable and prun- In response to interest in wine grape production in the Cham- ing weights were in range for adequate vine plain and Upper Hudson River region of Northern New York, size. Kevin Iungerman of the Northestern New York Fruit Extension • Quality metrics fell within the recommend- Program established a grape variety trial at the Willsboro Re- ed range in six of the seven years. Soluble search Farm, on the southwestern shores of Lake Champlain. solids tend to be low for this site compared Twenty-four varieties, including 14 cold-hardy “University of to other regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Grape Varieties for Indiana HO-221-W Purdue Extension 2
    PURDUE EXTENSION PURDUE EXTENSION HO-221-W Grape Varieties for Indiana Bruce Bordelon Matching the variety’s characteristics to the site climate Purdue Horticulture and Landscape Architecture is critical for successful grape production.Varieties differ www.hort.purdue.edu significantly in their cold hardiness, ripening dates, All photos by Bruce Bordelon and Steve Somermeyer tolerance to diseases, and so on, so some are better suited to certain sites than others. The most important considerations in variety selection are: Selecting an appropriate grape variety is a major factor for successful production in Indiana and all parts of • Matching the variety’s cold hardiness to the site’s the Midwest. There are literally thousands of grape expected minimum winter temperatures varieties available. Realistically, however, there are only • Matching the variety’s ripening season with the site’s a few dozen that are grown to any extent worldwide, and length of growing season and heat unit accumulation fewer than 20 make up the bulk of world production. Consistent production of high quality grapes requires The minimum temperature expected for an area properly matching the variety to the climate of the often dictates variety selection. In Indiana, midwinter vineyard site. minimum temperatures range from 0 to -5°F in the southwest corner, to -15 to -20°F in the northwest This publication identifies these climactic factors, and and north central regions.Very hardy varieties can then examines wine grape varieties and table grape withstand temperatures as cold as -15°F with little injury, varieties. Tables 1, 2, and 3 provide the varieties best while tender varieties will suffer significant injury at adapted for Indiana, their relative cold hardiness and temperatures slightly below zero.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Vigneron a Newsletter for the Grape Growers and Wine Makers of Oklahoma Volume 4, Issue 2 April-June 2009
    Oklahoma State University and Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Le Vigneron A newsletter for the grape growers and wine makers of Oklahoma Volume 4, issue 2 April-June 2009 Co-editors: • Eric T. Stafne I’m Not Liking What I See... • William McGlynn Walking through the Perkins vineyard this late winter and early spring I saw several varieties with a crusted exudate stuck to the vine. When I snapped it off, I was not surprised to see a hole where an insect had bored into the vine. Is this unusual? Unfortunately, no, at least here in Oklahoma. This borer is the grape cane borer (also called the apple twig borer). It is drawn to stressed and damaged vines. I suspect their infes- tation is primarily due to the Easter 2007 freeze event. Vines are still in various stages of recovery. Even though some varieties such as Cynthi- ana showed no outward injury or damage effects from that freeze, I have Inside this issue: still seen some holes in those vines. Control is not the easiest on these Not Liking What I See 1 critters because you must get them before they bore into the vine and protect themselves from spray contact. Timing for control is in the fall GMSC Update 1 and the time just prior to budbreak. Probably the best chemical is Imi- dan, but there may be others as well. Read and follow the label before Predicted Budbreak Dates 2 applying. Another thing I don’t like is the weather. Late March and early April into the 20’s? Hmm, doesn’t sound like good news for Char- Technical Tipple 2 donnay, Marechal Foch, Chardonel, or any of the other early budbreak varieties.
    [Show full text]
  • Wine from Cold Hardy Grapes
    Making, Blending, and Selling Wines From Cold Hardy Cultivars Stephen Menke Colorado State University-WCRC Desirable Traits in Hybrid Grape Wines Great fruitiness Usually good color Sufficient acid Great taste intensity upon presentation to mouth Good food pairing Good dry or sweet Problem Traits in Hybrid Grape Wines Some strong varietal aromas and tastes Can be too acid Tannins low Prone to structural breakdown of flavor and body Sweeter wines prone to re-fermentation Cool Climate Vitis vinifera Intraspecific Crosses Cool Climate = winter minimum of -50F to -150F, and depends on acclimation Lemberger (red, moderate cold resistance, fruity, good wine quality) Comtessa (red used for white, moderate cold resistance, fruity wine) Siegerrebe (white, fairly cold resistant, very floral wine) Noblessa (white, moderate cold resistance, good wine quality reported) Morio muscat (white, moderate cold, northeast US, very floral and fruity) Madeleine Angevine (white, moderate cold, good wine quality reported) Cool Climate Hybrids/Natives vinifera/American, vinifera/amurensis, Cornell, Minnesota, UC Davis Useful site http://viticulture.hort.iastate.edu/cultivars/cultivars.html Cool Climate = winter minimum of -50F to -150F, and depends on acclimation Reds Baco noir, Chambourcin, Chancellor, Concord, Corot noir, Crimson cabernet, DeChaunac, GR7, Kozma 55, Kozma 525, Landot noir, Leon Millot, Marechal Foch, Noiret, Norton, St. Vincent Cool Climate Hybrids/Natives vinifera/American, vinifera/amurensis, Cornell, Minnesota, UC Davis Cool Climate = winter minimum of -50F to -150F, and depends on acclimation Whites Catawba (rosé), Cayuga white, Chardonel, Delaware, Niagara, Seyval blanc, Traminette, Valvin muscat, Veeblanc, Vidal blanc, Vignoles Cold Climate Hybrids Swenson, Minnesota, Cornell, etc. Cold Climate = winter minimum of -150F to - 300F, depends on acclimation Reds Baltica, Frontenac, Marquette, MN 1200, Sabrevois, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Enology Services Lab 2012 Report
    Appalachian State University’s Enology Services Lab 2012 Report Introduction • Data pulled from over 1,000 samples submitted between July 2010 and January 2012 (roughly 5,000 data points) • In this report we will go through juice then wine sample data Full List of Varietals Submitted (Juice and Wine Samples) Aglianico Maréchal Foch Seyval blanc Albariño Marquette St. Croix Barbera Merlot Symphony Cabernet Franc Montepulciano Syrah Cabernet Sauvignon Muscat Tempranillo Carlos Nebbiolo Touriga Nacional Catawba Niagara Traminette Chambourcin Noble Vermentino Chancellor Noiret Vidal blanc Chardonel Norton Viognier Chardonnay Petit Mensing Vogue blanc Concord Petite Verdot Zinfandel Diamond Pinot gris Frontenac Pinot noir Landot noir Riesling Also Submitted: Magnolia Sangiovese Cider Malbec Sauvignon blanc Fruit Wine Juice Samples • Over 250 juice samples Sample Variety (Juice) Percent Chardonnay 11.0% submitted, with 222 Viognier 7.8% having varietal specified Cabernet Sauvignon 7.3% • Nine varietals made up Merlot 7.3% Seyval Blanc 7.3% 64% of juice submissions; Cabernet Franc 6.4% the remaining 36% Sangiovese 6.4% dispersed between 25 Chambourcin 5.5% Traminette 5.0% additional varietals Total 64% Juice Varietals Breakdown Vinifera Red (38% of Total) Percent Vinifera White (29% of Total) Percent Merlot 18.8% Chardonnay 37.5% Cabernet Sauvignon 18.8% Viognier 26.6% Cabernet Franc 16.5% Pinot Gris 14.1% Sangiovese 16.5% Riesling 12.5% Syrah 10.6% Vermentino 6.3% Petite Verdot 5.9% Petit Mensing 1.6% Tempranillo 4.7% White Vinifera Blend 1.6% Aglianico 2.4% Malbec 2.4% Barbera 2.4% Syrah/Viognier 0.0% Nebbiolo 1.2% Zinfandel 0.0% Hybrid Red (12% of Total) Percent Hybrid White (18% of Total) Percent Chambourcin 46.2% Seyval Blanc 41.0% Maréchal Foch 15.4% Traminette 28.2% Frontenac 7.7% Vidal Blanc 10.3% Norton 7.7% Chardonel 5.1% St.
    [Show full text]
  • Atti Proceedings
    QUINTO CONGRESSO INTERNAZIONALE SULLA VITICOLTURA DI MONTAGNA E IN FORTE PENDENZA FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MOUNTAIN AND STEEP SLOPE VITICULTURE Conegliano (Treviso-Veneto) – Italia 29 marzo - 1 aprile 2017 " Le viticolture estreme: valori, bellezze, alleanze, fragilità" 1 "Extreme viticulture: values, beauties, alliances, vulnerabilities” ATTI PROCEEDINGS POSTER POSTER ISBN - 9788890233036 PATRONAGE: QUINTO CONGRESSO INTERNAZIONALE SULLA VITICOLTURA DI MONTAGNA E IN FORTE PENDENZA FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MOUNTAIN AND STEEP SLOPE VITICULTURE Sessione I Session I 2 Pratiche agronomiche e ambientamento climatico dei vitigni nella viticoltura di montagna Agronomic practices and varietal climate adaptation in mountain and steep slope vineyards PATRONAGE: Pre-harvest techniques to control ripening dynamic of Sauvignon blanc grapes cultivated in mountain area: first results Tononi M., Wenter A., Zanotelli D. and Andreotti C. Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Faculty of Science and Technology, P.zza Universitá 5, 39100 Bolzano-Bozen, Italy Abstract The effects induced by climatic changes have become more and more evident in wine regions located in mountain areas during the last years. The trend toward an increasing warming of the temperature is determining new ripening dynamics of grape berries that often lead to excessive sugar accumulation in fruits and alcohol development in wines. This fact somehow conflicts with the actual trend of wine markets that is increasingly asking for fresh, easy-to-drink, low alcohol wines. Moreover, other important quality traits of grapes and wines such as color, aroma, acidity and pH are detrimentally affected by ripening processes that occur largely during the hottest period of the season. Against this background, we aimed with this work to investigate the potentiality of different canopy management techniques to control and postpone the ripening process of Sauvignon blanc grapes.
    [Show full text]