Conservation Advice Tas Ovata Brookeriana Forests and Woodlands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conservation Advice Tas Ovata Brookeriana Forests and Woodlands Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) Threatened Ecological Communities APPROVED CONSERVATION ADVICE (INCORPORATING LISTING ADVICE) - Tasmanian Forests and Woodlands dominated by black gum or Brookers gum (Eucalyptus ovata / E. brookeriana) 1. The Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) was set up under the EPBC Act to give advice to the Minister for the Environment (the Minister) in relation to the listing and conservation of threatened ecological communities, including under sections 189, 194N and 266B of the EPBC Act. 2. The Committee conducted a listing assessment following the ecological community being placed on the 2013 Finalised Priority Assessment List. 3. The Committee provided its advice on the Tasmanian Forests and Woodlands dominated by black gum or Brookers gum (Eucalyptus ovata / E. brookeriana) ecological community to the Minister in 2017 and an updated version in June 2019. The Committee recommended that: the ecological community merits listing as Critically Endangered; and a recovery plan is not required for the ecological community at this time. 4. A draft conservation advice for this ecological community was made available for expert and public comment for a minimum of 30 business days. The Committee and Minister had regard to all public and expert comment that is relevant to the consideration of the ecological community for listing. 5. In 2019 the Minister accepted the Committee’s advice, adopted this document as the approved conservation advice and agreed no recovery plan is required at this time.The Minister amended the list of threatened ecological communities under section 184 of the EPBC Act to include the Tasmanian Forests and Woodlands dominated by black gum or Brookers gum (Eucalyptus ovata / E. brookeriana) ecological community in the critically endangered category. 6. At the time of this advice, this ecological community corresponds closely with two threatened ecological communities that are listed as threatened under the Tasmanian Nature Conservation Act 2002. 7. This conservation advice was based on the best available information at the time it was approved; this includes scientific literature, advice from consultations, and existing plans, records or management prescriptions for this ecological community. Shrubby woodland with Eucalyptus ovata at Sandfly Recreation Area. Seedling E. ovata Photo credits: Department of the Environment and Energy, Canberra TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CONSERVATION OBJECTIVE 4 The benefits and national importance of this ecological community 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY 5 1.1. The ecological community 5 1.1.1. Name 1.1.2. Location and physical environment 1.1.3. Vegetative components 1.1.4. Faunal components 1.2. Relatonship to State vegetation classification systems 13 1.2.1. Caveat 1.2.2. TASVEG vegetation units 1.2.3. Tasmanian threatened native vegetation communities 2. IDENTIFYING AREAS OF THE NATIONAL ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY 16 PROTECTED UNDER NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT LAW 2.1. Introduction 16 2.2. Key diagnostic characteristics for the Black gum – Brookers gum 17 forest/woodland 2.3. Condition thresholds for the Black gum – Brookers gum forest/woodland 18 2.4. Further information to assist in determining the presence of the ecological 20 community and significant impacts 2.4.1. Defining a patch 2.4.2. Revegetated areas and areas of regeneration 2.4.3. Sampling protocol 2.4.4. Additional buffer zone around a patch 2.4.5. Surrounding environment, landscape context, and other guidance for avoiding and mitigating impacts 2.5. Area critical to the persistence of the ecological community 23 3. SUMMARY OF KEY THREATS 24 4. RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE THREATENED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC 25 COMMITTEE 4.1. Recommendation on eligibility for listing against EPBC Act criteria 25 4.2. Recommendation on whether to have a Recovery Plan 26 5. PRIORITY CONSERVATION AND RESEARCH ACTIONS 27 5.1. Principles and standards 27 Approved Conservation Advice – Tasmanian Forests and Woodlands Dominated by Black Gum or Brookers Gum 2 5.2. Priority actions 27 5.2.1. Protect 5.2.2. Restore 5.2.3. Communicate – Engage with and Support 5.2.4. Research and Monitoring 5.3. Offsets 34 5.4. Existing plans/management prescriptions relevant to the ecological community 35 BIBLIOGRAPHY 37 APPENDICES APPENDIX A – LISTS OF KEY SPECIES 47 APPENDIX B – ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ECOLOGICAL 56 COMMUNITY B1. Relationships to other listed Matters of National Environmental Significance under the EPBC Act (RAMSAR wetlands, Heritage properties, threatened species) B2. Regional Forests Agreement B3. Corresponding vegetation / mapping units B4. Similar vegetation types to the ecological community B5. Tenure and extent of the ecological community in conservation reserves B6. Relationship to the Vulnerable Eucalyptus ovata – Callitris oblonga Forest B7. Existing protection under State and Local Government laws B8. Indigenous knowledge APPENDIX C – DESCRIPTION OF KEY THREATS 74 C1. Land clearing and impacts associated with fragmentation C2. Altered hydrological regimes, including salinity C3. Invasive species and diseases (weeds, feral animals, dieback) C4. Land management practices (e.g. fertiliser addition, grazing by livestock) C5. Inappropriate fire regimes C6. Hybridisation with plantation eucalypts C7. Climate change C8. Nationally listed key threatening processes APPENDIX D – DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF ELIGIBILITY FOR LISTING 93 AGAINST THE EPBC ACT CRITERIA Criterion 1 - Decline in geographic distribution Criterion 2 - Limited geographic distribution coupled with demonstrable threat Criterion 3 - Loss or decline of functionally important species Criterion 4 - Reduction in community integrity Criterion 5 - Rate of continuing detrimental change Criterion 6 - Quantitative analysis showing probability of extinction Overall conclusion Approved Conservation Advice – Tasmanian Forests and Woodlands Dominated by Black Gum or Brookers Gum 3 CONSERVATION OBJECTIVE To prevent further loss and degradation of the Tasmanian Forests and Woodlands dominated by black gum or Brookers gum (Eucalyptus ovata / E. brookeriana) ecological community, and help recover its biodiversity and function through protecting it from significant impacts as a Matter of National Environmental Significance under national environmental law, and by guiding implementation of management and recovery, consistent with the recommended priority conservation and research actions set out in this advice. This conservation advice contains information relevant to the conservation objective by: describing the ecological community and where it can be found; identifying the key threats to the ecological community; presenting evidence (listing advice) to support the ecological community being listed as nationally threatened under national environment law; and outlining the priority conservation and research actions that could stop decline and support its recovery. The benefits and national importance of this ecological community The Tasmanian Forests and Woodlands dominated by black gum or Brookers gum (Eucalyptus ovata / E. brookeriana) ecological community generally occurs on low-lying damp sites, including riverine habitats. These are key, ecologically important areas that are responsible for maintaining water quantity and quality and help to prevent soil erosion and salinity. Consequently, they provide habitat and resources for many native plants and animals, including breeding and foraging areas for birds and bats that help to regulate agricultural and urban pests. The ecological community’s important position and function in the landscape also has other social and economic benefits. These include shelter for stock and support for agricultural production by maintaining water tables, healthy soils and riverine landscapes, and recreational values. Natural landscapes provide a wide variety of ecosystem services that are difficult to prescribe purely in terms of monetary values (de Groot et al. 2012). Over the long term, resilient, intact ecosystems are more likely to retain their services plus adaptive capacity to sustain production of these services in the face of environmental disruptions, such as climate change. Such services are often impossible to replace when natural systems become too degraded and dysfunctional. Approved Conservation Advice – Tasmanian Forests and Woodlands Dominated by Black Gum or Brookers Gum 4 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY The Tasmanian Forests and Woodlands dominated by black gum or Brookers gum (Eucalyptus ovata / E. brookeriana) ecological community is a type of eucalypt forest to woodland that is restricted to Tasmania and is associated with sites that are typically damp and/or poorly draining. The national ecological community has several variants, notably a major component dominated by Eucalyptus ovata (black gum) and another dominated by E. brookeriana (Brookers gum). This section describes the assemblage of native species that characterises the ecological community throughout its range at the time of listing. More comprehensive species lists are in Appendix A. However, even these do not include all of the species that make up the ecological community and many sites may have species that are not mentioned in this Conservation Advice. The ecological community also includes fungi and cryptogamic plants; however, these are less well documented. Characteristic species may be abundant or rare and only a subset of the complete list of species recorded in known
Recommended publications
  • Paropsisterna Selmani
    Plant Pest Factsheet Tasmanian Eucalyptus Beetle Paropsisterna selmani Figure 1. Adult Tasmanian Eucalyptus beetle, pre -hibernation, London © ZooTaxa, Paula French Background In 2007, an exotic leaf beetle was found damaging cultivated Eucalyptus species in County Kerry, Republic of Ireland. The same beetle had been previously found damaging Eucalyptus plantations in Tasmania, Australia, and in 2012 a single adult was photographed in a garden in London. The beetle was tentatively identified as Paropsisterna gloriosa (Blackburn) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) but subsequently described in 2013 as a new species P. selmani Reid & de Little. In June 2015 larvae of P. selmani were found causing severe defoliation to Eucalyptus plants at a public garden in Surrey; and in August 2015 a single adult was found in West Sussex. Geographical Distribution Paropsisterna selmani appears to be native to Tasmania, Australia, and has been introduced to the Republic of Ireland where it occurs widely in the south. Paropsisterna selmani has been found in three localities in South East England and is likely to become established in the UK. Host Plants Paropsisterna selmani feeds exclusively on Eucalyptus species (Myrtaceae), preferentially on glaucous-foliaged eucalypt species of the subgenus Symphyomyrtus, particularly the plantation tree E. nitens. Other hosts include: Eucalyptus brookeriana, E. dalrympleana, E. rubida, E. glaucesens, E. globulus, E. gunnii, E. johnstonii, E. moorei, E. nicholii, E. parvula, E. pauciflora ssp. niphophila, E. perriniana, E. pulverulenta, E. vernicosa and E. viminalis. Description Adult P. selmani are hemispherical (Figs. 1 and 4), oval (Figs. 2-3), and about 9 mm in length with the females being slightly larger than the males.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Testing
    Testing…testing… Background information Summary Students perform an experiment Most weeds have a variety of natural to determine the feeding enemies. Not all of these enemies make preferences of yellow admiral good biocontrol agents. A good biocontrol caterpillars. agent should feed only on the target weed. It should not harm crops, natives, Learning Objectives or other desirable plants, and it must not Students will be able to: become a pest itself. With this in mind, • Explain why biocontrol agents when scientists look for biocontrol agents, are tested before release. they look for “picky eaters”. • Describe how biocontrol agents are tested before Ideally, a biocontrol agent will be release. monophagous—eating only the target weed. Sometimes, however, an organism Suggested prior lessons that is oligophagous—eating a small What is a weed? number of related plants—is also a good Cultivating weeds agent, particularly when the closely related plants are also weeds. Curriculum Connections Science Levels 5 & 6 In order to test the safety of a potential biocontrol agent, scientists offer a variety Vocabulary/concepts of plants to the agent in the laboratory Choice test, no choice test, and/or in the field. They choose plants repeated trials, control, economic that are closely related to the target threshold weed, as these are the most likely plants to be attacked. The non-target plants Time tested may be crops, native plants, 30-45 minutes pre-experiment ornamentals, or even other weeds. The discussion and set-up tests are designed to answer two main 30-45 minutes data collection questions: and discussion 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Fauna
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Volume 2 Technical Papers MUNMORAH GAS TURBINE FACILITY MUNMORAH POWER STATION.indd 3 21/12/05 2:27:29 PM Contents Technical Papers (Volume 2) Technical Paper No.1 Flora and Fauna Assessment Technical Paper No.2 Heritage Assessment Technical Paper No.3 Noise Assessment Technical Paper No.4 Air Quality Impact Assessment Technical Paper No 5 Photochemical Pollution Assessment Technical Paper No 6 Preliminary Hazard Analysis FLORA AND FAUNA ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL PAPER DIVIDERS.indd 30 121/12/05 3:44:33 PM Technical Paper 1 Flora and Fauna Assessment of Munmorah Gas Turbine Facility December 2005 Delta Electricity Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Limited ACN 078 004 798 and Parsons Brinckerhoff International (Australia) Pty Limited ACN 006 475 056 trading as Parsons Brinckerhoff ABN 84 797 323 433 Level 27 Ernst & Young Centre 680 George Street Sydney NSW 2000 GPO Box 5394 Australia Telephone +61 2 9272 5100 Facsimile +61 2 9272 5101 Email [email protected] ABN 84 797 323 433 NCSI Certified Quality System ISO 9001 2116541A Parsons Brinckerhoff supports the Environment by PR_2467.doc printing on 100per cent A4 recycled paper ©Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Limited and Parsons Brinckerhoff International (Australia) Pty Limited trading as Parsons Brinckerhoff (“PB”). [2005] Copyright in the drawings, information and data recorded in this document (“the information”) is the property of PB. This document and the information are solely for the use of the authorised recipient and this document may not be used, copied or reproduced in whole or part for any purpose other than that for which it was supplied by PB.
    [Show full text]
  • Urtica Urens
    Dwarf Nettle Urtica urens Weed management guide for Australian vegetable production INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT Identification Dwarf nettle (Urtica urens) is an annual herbaceous plant, native to Mediterranean Europe, that grows between 10 and 75 cm in height. Leaves are up to 6 cm in length but often 1-3 cm, oval to elliptical in shape, deeply toothed or serrated on the edges, green to dark green, and covered with scattered stinging hairs. Clusters of small, greenish-white flowers form where 1 the leaves join the stems. Dwarf nettle is also known in Australia as small nettle, lesser nettle, or stinging nettle. Vegetable farmers are likely to be very familiar with it where it is found on their farm, and to be well aware of how to identify it. However depending on its stage of growth, it may be possible to mis-identify it as tall nettle (Urtica dioica), native scrub 2 nettle (Urtica incisa) or potentially deadnettle (Lamium amplexicaule), particularly where the plants are recently germinated. Figure 1 includes a series of photos of dwarf nettle at different life stages in order to facilitate correct identifica- tion on-farm, from a young seedling through to a mature 3 flowering plant. Dwarf nettle may be mis-identified as native scrub nettle (Urtica incisa), a common species native to Australia. 4 Compared to dwarf nettle, native scrub nettle reaches up to 1m in height, has longer lance-shaped leaves (up to 12 cm) that are paler beneath, fewer stinging hairs, and spike-like clusters of flowers that can be longer than the leaf stalks.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Advice for the Karst Springs and Associated Alkaline Fens of the Naracoorte Coastal Plain Bioregion
    The Threatened Species Scientific Committee provided their advice to the Minister on 31 July 2020. The Minister approved this Conservation Advice on 3 December 2020 and agreed that no recovery plan is required at this time. Conservation Advice1 for the Karst springs and associated alkaline fens of the Naracoorte Coastal Plain Bioregion This document combines the approved conservation advice and listing assessment for the threatened ecological community. It provides a foundation for conservation action and further planning. Karst springs and alkaline fens, Ewen Ponds © Copyright, Anthony Hoffman Conservation Status The Karst springs and associated alkaline fens of the Naracoorte Coastal Bioregion is listed in the Endangered category of the threatened ecological communities list under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The ecological community was assessed by the Threatened Species Scientific Committee, who found it to be eligible for listing as Endangered and recommended that a recovery plan is not required at this time. The Committee’s assessment and recommendations are at Section 6. The Committee’s assessment of the eligibility against each of the listing criteria is: Criterion 1: Vulnerable Criterion 2: Endangered Criterion 3: Insufficient data Criterion 4: Endangered Criterion 5: Insufficient data Criterion 6: Insufficient data The main factors that make the threatened ecological community eligible for listing in the Endangered category are its historic losses to drainage, clearing and resulting fragmentation, and ongoing threats to its integrity and function, particularly from hydrological changes. The Karst springs and associated alkaline fens of the Naracoorte Coastal Plain Bioregion occurs within country (the traditional lands) of the Boandik and the Gunditjmara peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • Barness Masters 00 to 03 Intro And
    Crown Structure & the Canopy Arthropod Biodiversity of 100 Year Old and Old Growth Tasmanian Eucalyptus obliqua by Yoav Daniel Bar-Ness B.Sc.(Wildlife Sciences) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters (Research) of Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, January 2005 This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of the my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis. Yoav Daniel Bar-Ness This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Abstract: The crown structure and canopy arthropods of Eucalyptus obliqua were studied at the Warra Long Term Ecological Research Site in the wet sclerophyll forests of Southern Tasmania. Eight 100 year old and eight old-growth (between 300-500 years old) trees were studied in pairs. Despite their critical role in the economy and ecology of Tasmania, few studies have addressed the canopy arthropod biodiversity of these trees. The crown structure was mapped by recording a vector in spherical space for every branch. 3- dimensional computer models were generated to aid in illustrating the tree maps. Sticky traps, flight intercept traps, and funnel crawl traps were placed in the crown to sample mobile arthropods. The age classes were quantifiably different in crown structure. 100 year old trees had young mature crowns of original branches.
    [Show full text]
  • A Regional Examination of the Mistletoe Host Species Inventory
    354 Cunninghamia 8(3): 2004 Downey, Examination of the mistletoe host inventory A regional examination of the mistletoe host species inventory Paul Owen Downey Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research, CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, AUSTRALIA. Present Address Institute of Conservation Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522 AUSTRALIA. [email protected] Abstract: Downey (1998) collated an inventory of mistletoe host species based on herbaria records for every aerial mistletoe species (families Loranthaceae and Viscaceae) in Australia. In this paper the representative nature of those host lists is examined in an extensive field survey of mistletoes and their host species in south-eastern New South Wales (including Australian Capital Territory). Four new host species not in the 1998 inventory, and eight new mistletoe-host combinations (i.e. a previously recorded host but not for that particular mistletoe species) were collected. These new records were distributed throughout the survey area. Interestingly, these new host-mistletoe combinations were for mistletoe species that were well represented in the national inventory (i.e. with many herbarium collections and numerous host species). The initial inventory was incomplete, at least for south-eastern New South Wales, indicating the need for (i) more targeted surveys similar to this one, and/or (ii) regular updates of the host inventory based on voucher specimens. A possible reasons why information on host-mistletoe combinations is incomplete may be that such combinations may be dynamic (i.e. mistletoe species may be expanding their suite of potential hosts, either fortuitously or as result of evolutionary pressures).
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural Distribution of Eucalyptus Species in Tasmania
    The natural distribution of Eucalyptus species in Tasmania K.J. Williams and B.M. Potts Cooperative Research Centre for Temperate Hardwood Forestry, Department of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252–55, Hobart 7001 email: [email protected]./[email protected] Abstract dispersed (E. cordata) or disjunct (E. archeri) occurrences. Most species that are rare in A summary is provided of the natural geographic Tasmania are endemics, with the exception of distributions of the 29 Tasmanian Eucalyptus E. perriniana and E. aff. radiata, although species. The work is based on over 60 000 the taxonomic status of the latter requires observations from numerous data sources. A map investigation. Unresolved issues relating to the on a 10 km x 10 km grid-cell scale is presented for natural distribution and taxonomic affinities of each species and is accompanied by graphs of the the Tasmanian eucalypt species are summarised. altitudinal range and flowering times, as well as descriptive notes on distribution and ecology, supplemented with a list of key references. The Introduction geographic pattern of species richness is examined at generic, subgeneric and series levels. Total In Tasmania and the Bass Strait islands, species richness is greater in the drier, eastern 29 native eucalypt species (one of which has regions compared to the wet, western regions of two subspecies) are recognised by Buchanan Tasmania, with highest concentrations of species (1995), from two informal subgenera, occurring mainly in the central east coast and Monocalyptus and Symphyomyrtus (Pryor and south-eastern regions. Monocalyptus species Johnson 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • Whitehorse Urban Biodiversity Strategy
    WHITEHORSE URBAN BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY For Council managed open space, streetscapes and community facilities Whitehorse Urban Biodiversity Strategy for Council Managed Open Space, Streetscapes and Community Facilities Contents Acknowledgements 4 9.1.11 Ground Level Habitat/Coarse Woody 24 Executive Summary 5 Material Fuel Reduction Guidelines Glossary Of Terms 6 9.1.12 Expand the Existing Infill Tree Planting 24 Program to Improve Canopy Cover 1 Introduction 6 9.1.13 Biodiversity Research Liaison 24 Committee 2 What Is Biodiversity 8 2.1 Defining “Whitehorse Biodiversity” 8 9.2 New Biodiversity Actions: One-Off 25 2.2 What are Public Whitehorse 8 Commitments Biodiversity Assets? 9.2.1 Development of An Inventory of 25 2.3 Water and Biodiversity 8 Whitehorse Biodiversity Assets 3 Statutory Context 13 10 9.2.2 List of “Biodiversity Hotspots” 25 3.1 Whitehorse City Council Policies 10 9.2.3 Development of A Biodiversity 26 and Strategies Corridors Plan 9.2.4 Identify Potential “No Mow” Areas 26 4 The Whitehorse Landscape and Biodiversity 10 9.2.5 Vegetation Management Plans For 26 4.1 Aboriginal History of Whitehorse 10 Large Tracts Of Land With 4.2 Natural Landscape of Whitehorse 10 Alternative Uses 4.3 The Remaining Natural Landscape 12 9.2.6 Biodiversity Engagement – Logos 26 of Whitehorse and Signage 4.4 The Suburban Whitehorse 14 9.2.7 Development Of Monitoring 27 Landscape Program 4.5 What Biodiversity is Missing 14 9.2.8 Community Reporting and Data 27 From Whitehorse Gathering 4.6 What Whitehorse Biodiversity Remains 15 9.2.9 Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • On the Flora of Australia
    L'IBRARY'OF THE GRAY HERBARIUM HARVARD UNIVERSITY. BOUGHT. THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA, ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION; BEING AN TO THE FLORA OF TASMANIA. BY JOSEPH DALTON HOOKER, M.D., F.R.S., L.S., & G.S.; LATE BOTANIST TO THE ANTARCTIC EXPEDITION. LONDON : LOVELL REEVE, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN. r^/f'ORElGN&ENGLISH' <^ . 1859. i^\BOOKSELLERS^.- PR 2G 1.912 Gray Herbarium Harvard University ON THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION. I I / ON THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA, ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION; BEIKG AN TO THE FLORA OF TASMANIA. BY JOSEPH DALTON HOOKER, M.D., F.R.S., L.S., & G.S.; LATE BOTANIST TO THE ANTARCTIC EXPEDITION. Reprinted from the JJotany of the Antarctic Expedition, Part III., Flora of Tasmania, Vol. I. LONDON : LOVELL REEVE, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN. 1859. PRINTED BY JOHN EDWARD TAYLOR, LITTLE QUEEN STREET, LINCOLN'S INN FIELDS. CONTENTS OF THE INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. § i. Preliminary Remarks. PAGE Sources of Information, published and unpublished, materials, collections, etc i Object of arranging them to discuss the Origin, Peculiarities, and Distribution of the Vegetation of Australia, and to regard them in relation to the views of Darwin and others, on the Creation of Species .... iii^ § 2. On the General Phenomena of Variation in the Vegetable Kingdom. All plants more or less variable ; rate, extent, and nature of variability ; differences of amount and degree in different natural groups of plants v Parallelism of features of variability in different groups of individuals (varieties, species, genera, etc.), and in wild and cultivated plants vii Variation a centrifugal force ; the tendency in the progeny of varieties being to depart further from their original types, not to revert to them viii Effects of cross-impregnation and hybridization ultimately favourable to permanence of specific character x Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection ; — its effects on variable organisms under varying conditions is to give a temporary stability to races, species, genera, etc xi § 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Broad Typology of Dry Rainforests on the Western Slopes of New South Wales
    A broad typology of dry rainforests on the western slopes of New South Wales Timothy J. Curran1,2, Peter J. Clarke1, and Jeremy J. Bruhl 1 1 Botany, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351, AUSTRALIA. 2 Author for correspondence. Current address: The School for Field Studies, Centre for Rainforest Studies, PO Box 141, Yungaburra, Queensland 4884, AUSTRALIA. [email protected] & [email protected] Abstract: Dry rainforests are those communities that have floristic and structural affinities to mesic rainforests and occur in parts of eastern and northern Australia where rainfall is comparatively low and often highly seasonal. The dry rainforests of the western slopes of New South Wales are poorly-understood compared to other dry rainforests in Australia, due to a lack of regional scale studies. This paper attempts to redress this by deriving a broad floristic and structural typology for this vegetation type. Phytogeographical analysis followed full floristic surveys conducted on 400 m2 plots located within dry rainforest across the western slopes of NSW. Cluster analysis and ordination of 208 plots identified six floristic groups. Unlike in some other regional studies of dry rainforest these groups were readily assigned to Webb structural types, based on leaf size classes, leaf retention classes and canopy height. Five community types were described using both floristic and structural data: 1)Ficus rubiginosa–Notelaea microcarpa notophyll vine thicket, 2) Ficus rubiginosa–Alectryon subcinereus–Notelaea microcarpa notophyll vine forest, 3) Elaeodendron australe–Notelaea microcarpa–Geijera parviflora notophyll vine thicket, 4) Notelaea microcarpa– Geijera parviflora–Ehretia membranifolia semi-evergreen vine thicket, and 5) Cadellia pentastylis low microphyll vine forest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation Communities Dry Eucalypt Forest and Woodland
    Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Dry eucalypt forest and woodland Eucalyptus amygdalina Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark 1 Dry eucalypt forest and woodland Community (Code) Page Eucalyptus amygdalina coastal forest and woodland (DAC) 11 Eucalyptus amygdalina forest and woodland on dolerite (DAD) 13 Eucalyptus amygdalina forest and woodland on sandstone (DAS) 15 Eucalyptus amygdalina forest on mudstone (DAM) 17 Eucalyptus amygdalina inland forest and woodland on Cainozoic deposits (DAZ) 19 Eucalyptus amygdalina–Eucalyptus obliqua damp sclerophyll forest (DSC) 22 Eucalyptus barberi forest and woodland (DBA) 24 Eucalyptus coccifera forest and woodland (DCO) 25 Eucalyptus cordata forest (DCR) 27 Eucalyptus dalrympleana–Eucalyptus pauciflora forest and woodland (DDP) 29 Eucalyptus delegatensis dry forest and woodland (DDE) 31 Eucalyptus globulus dry forest and woodland (DGL) 33 Eucalyptus gunnii woodland (DGW) 35 Eucalyptus morrisbyi forest and woodland (DMO) 37 Eucalyptus nitida dry forest and woodland (DNI) 39 Eucalyptus nitida Furneaux forest (DNF) 41 Eucalyptus obliqua dry forest (DOB) 43 Eucalyptus ovata forest and woodland (DOV) 45 Eucalyptus ovata heathy woodland (DOW) 48 Eucalyptus pauciflora forest and woodland not on dolerite (DPO) 50 Eucalyptus pauciflora forest and woodland on dolerite (DPD) 52 Eucalyptus perriniana forest and woodland (DPE) 54 Eucalyptus pulchella forest and woodland (DPU) 56 Eucalyptus risdonii forest and woodland (DRI) 58 Eucalyptus rodwayi forest and woodland (DRO) 60 Eucalyptus
    [Show full text]