DOCSLIB.ORG

Fire in the Caucasus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fire in the Caucasus and government officials to collectivize Chechnya and Ingushetia, but the fact Geography private lands and to maintain order over that terrorists of other nationalities, in- the rebellious Caucasus cultures. The pro- cluding Arabs, were accompanying them in the cesses of collectivization and russification is an ominous threat. This is an indication News™ solidified many of the minority cultures, that international support among terror- particularly when the czarists and Com- ist organizations may have been involved. munists were extremely brutal toward The bombing may have been an ef- the ethnic groups. As an example, in 1944, fort to start a regional war, a catastrophe Neal G. Josef Stalin had hundreds of Chechens, that could widen the Chechen conflict. Lineback Ingush, Karachais, Balkars, and Kalmyks The terrorists may have hoped to ignite hanged or shot and deported 677,988 de- an ethnic wars between Ossetians and ported to Kazakhstan, according to au- Ingushetians to draw in Muslims from all FIRE IN THE thor Anatoly V. Isaenko. across the Caucasus. CAUCASUS Shortly after the Soviet Union broke Added to the recent downings of two up in 1991, Chechens announced their Russian domestic airliners allegedly by By Neal Lineback independence. In 1996, the Chechen army suicide bombers, the school bombing & Anatoly V. Isaenko repelled the Russian army. The Russians leaves little doubt that the Chechens are a regrouped and the conflict escalated into serious threat to the Russian society. Among the world’s longest-lived a rebel action, with terrorist activity ex- President Vladimir Putin’s recently hotspots is the Caucasus region, rivaling tending all the way to Moscow. In 1999, won reelection by promoting a strongman only the Balkans as a volatile kettle of the Chechen conflict spilled into neigh- image. The danger is that the Chechen violent and rebellious ethnic cultures. The boring Dagestan, with rebels occupying terrorist action will bring a domestic crack- recent terrorist school bombing in Beslan several border towns and villages. down that will immerse the Caucasus in a that killed more than 336 Russians, half of The recent school bombing in the city regional war, exactly what the Chechen them children, is being blamed on rebels of Beslan occurred in North Ossetia- rebels want. in neighboring Chechnya. Alania, the small Orthodox Christian re- And that is Geography in the News™. The Caucasus mountain chain ex- public to the west of Ingushetia and November 5, 2004. #751. tends generally east-west between the Chechnya. North Ossetians have an eth- Caspian Sea and the Black Sea. These (Co-author/editor Neal Lineback is a Ge- nic conflict with the predominantly Mus- high, rough and rugged mountains are ography Professor and Interim Dean of the lim Igushetians. The focus of the attack over 400 miles long and 100 miles wide College of Arts and Sciences at Appalachian was a huge elite Ossetian school, occu- (645 x 161 km.). Isolated valleys separated State University, Boone, NC. Co-author pied by hundreds of children and parents by high mountains dot the region, pro- Anatoly V. Isaenko is a Cossack from North on the first day of school. This was a viding refuge to the numerous different Ossetia-Alania, the former History Chair at terrorist attack, involving heavily armed cultures that sprang up in the region. North Ossetian State University, a Fulbright suicide bombers. Three former Soviet republics located grantee at Duke University, and currently a The terrorists were reportedly mostly in the Caucasus received their indepen- history professor at Appalachian State Uni- Islamists (radical Muslims) from dence from the Soviet Union in 1991- versity.) Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia. Azerbaijan is predominantly Muslim, Nightmare in the Caucasus Region while Georgia and Armenia are Chris- 0 75 mi tian. ©2004 Kalmykia 0 75 km Other small autonomous Muslim re- publics lying along the northern flank of RUSSIA the Caucasus are part of greater Russia Caspian and have not been independent in recent Sea history. They were Karachayevo- Cherkessia, Kabardino-Balkaria, North Karachay - Ossetia-Alania, Ingushetia, Chechnya, Cherkessia Kabardino - and Dagestan. Ingushetia and Chechnya Balkaria Ingushetia Grozny have particularly chaffed under czarist, North Beslan Chechnya Soviet and now Russian dominance for Ossetia centuries. C a u c a Dagestan Living among and around the pre- s u s dominantly Muslim populations of these Black GEORGIA Sea small republics are Christians, many of T’bilisi them Russians and Cossacks. Through- out the 20th Century, the Communist TURKEY party sent thousands of Russian soldiers Geography in the News 11/05/04 ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN P. Larkins © 2004 maps.com.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The
    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
    [Show full text]
  • Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention
    Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2001 to 2005 Moscow, May 2006 CONTENT Introduction .......................................................................................................................................4 Summary...........................................................................................................................................5 Article 2 ..........................................................................................................................................14 Measures taken to improve the conditions in detention facilities .............................................14 Measures to improve the situation in penal institutions and protection of prisoners’ human rights ..........................................................................................................................................15 Measures taken to improve the situation in temporary isolation wards of the Russian Ministry for Internal Affairs and other custodial places ..........................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent torture and cruel and depredating treatment in work of police and other law-enforcement institutions ............................................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent cruel treatment in the armed forces ................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • The North Caucasus Ways Forward for Russia and the European Union
    Building Stability in the North Caucasus Ways Forward for Russia and the European Union SIPRI Policy Paper No. 16 Neil J. Melvin Stockholm International Peace Research Institute May 2007 © SIPRI, 2007 ISSN 1652-0432 (print) ISSN 1653-7548 (online) Printed in Sweden by CM Gruppen, Bromma Contents Preface iv Map of the North Caucasus vi Table A.1. Data on the North Caucasus and the Russian Federation vii 1. Introduction: instability in the North Caucasus 1 The structure of this Policy Paper 6 2. The roots of instability in the North Caucasus 7 Incorporation and pacification 7 The North Caucasus in the Soviet Union 9 World War II and Stalin 11 The post-Stalin era and perestroika 12 The North Caucasus in the Russian Federation 15 Nationalist mobilization 15 The failure of state building in the North Caucasus 17 Religious revival 18 The first Chechen war 21 3. The North Caucasus in the Putin era 24 Putin’s new course 24 Replacing local elites 26 The second Chechen war 28 Russia’s ‘war on terrorism’ 31 The role of the international community 35 4. Prospects for the North Caucasus 37 National–territorial issues 37 Islam and Islamism 40 Governance in the North Caucasus 43 Socio-economic issues 44 Russia’s security policies 45 The North Caucasus and the European Union 46 5. Recommendations 48 Recommendations for the Russian Federation 48 Recommendations for the European Union 54 About the author 59 Preface For most people, the notion of conflict in the North Caucasus—a region within the Russian Federation, as distinct from the independent states of the South Cau- casus—is synonymous with Chechnya.
    [Show full text]
  • Chechnya's Status Within the Russian
    SWP Research Paper Uwe Halbach Chechnya’s Status within the Russian Federation Ramzan Kadyrov’s Private State and Vladimir Putin’s Federal “Power Vertical” Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs SWP Research Paper 2 May 2018 In the run-up to the Russian presidential elections on 18 March 2018, the Kremlin further tightened the federal “vertical of power” that Vladimir Putin has developed since 2000. In the North Caucasus, this above all concerns the republic of Dagestan. Moscow intervened with a powerful purge, replacing the entire political leadership. The situation in Chechnya, which has been ruled by Ramzan Kadyrov since 2007, is conspicuously different. From the early 2000s onwards, President Putin conducted a policy of “Chechenisation” there, delegating the fight against the armed revolt to local security forces. Under Putin’s protection, the republic gained a leadership which is now publicly referred to by Russians as the “Chechen Khanate”, among other similar expressions. Kadyrov’s breadth of power encompasses an independ- ent foreign policy, which is primarily orientated towards the Middle East. Kadyrov emphatically professes that his republic is part of Russia and presents himself as “Putin’s foot soldier”. Yet he has also transformed the federal subject of Chechnya into a private state. The ambiguous relationship between this republic and the central power fundamentally rests on the loyalty pact between Putin and Kadyrov. However, criticism of this arrange- ment can now occasionally be heard even in the Russian president’s inner circles. With regard to Putin’s fourth term, the question arises just how long the pact will last.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Forests and Climate Change
    Russian forests and What Science Can Tell Us climate change Pekka Leskinen, Marcus Lindner, Pieter Johannes Verkerk, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Jo Van Brusselen, Elena Kulikova, Mariana Hassegawa and Bas Lerink (editors) What Science Can Tell Us 11 2020 What Science Can Tell Us Sven Wunder, Editor-In-Chief Georg Winkel, Associate Editor Pekka Leskinen, Associate Editor Minna Korhonen, Managing Editor The editorial office can be contacted at [email protected] Layout: Grano Oy Recommended citation: Leskinen, P., Lindner, M., Verkerk, P.J., Nabuurs, G.J., Van Brusselen, J., Kulikova, E., Hassegawa, M. and Lerink, B. (eds.). 2020. Russian forests and climate change. What Science Can Tell Us 11. European Forest Institute. ISBN 978-952-5980-99-8 (printed) ISBN 978-952-7426-00-5 (pdf) ISSN 2342-9518 (printed) ISSN 2342-9526 (pdf) https://doi.org/10.36333/wsctu11 Supported by: This publication was produced with the financial support of the European Union’s Partnership Instrument and the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Na- ture Conservation, and Nuclear Safety (BMU) in the context of the International Cli- mate Initiative (IKI). The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the European Forest Institute and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funders. Russian forests and What Science Can Tell Us climate change Pekka Leskinen, Marcus Lindner, Pieter Johannes Verkerk, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Jo Van Brusselen, Elena Kulikova, Mariana Hassegawa and Bas Lerink (editors) Contents Authors ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Language Policy in the Republic of Kalmykia: the State and Perspectives
    LANGUAGE POLICY IN THE REPUBLIC OF KALMYKIA: THE STATE AND PERSPECTIVES A.N.Bitkeeva Post-graduate student, Institute of Linguistics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Research Center on Ethnic and Language Relations (Russia, Moscow) Language, as it is known is a social phenomenon, mother tongue is the main factor of nation's vital activity. Almost every nation comes across language problems in it's history. The world linguistic practice knows successful experiences of restoration and expansion of social functions of languages. That is an effective language policy towards Irish in Ireland, Catalan in Spain, Hebrew in Israel. Language experience of these countries shows how important are the principles of language policy being one of the main components of national state policy. These examples of language revitalization, broadening of their social functions have a lot of in common. The specialists in language regulation recommend to follow principles that are universal, can be applied almost to all languages. But it is necessary to take into account such factors as originality of nations, uniqueness of their languages, history, culture, mentality that must be assumed as a basis of language policy. Correct language regulation is one of the fundamental factors of stability in international relations in the region, because functional interaction of languages it is for the first instance an interaction of ethnicities speaking these languages. There is an opinion that linguistic process passes more quitly in the countries based on territory principle, more critical in the countries based on national-administrative devision. Among such countries is Russian Federation. Russia is a multinational country, there live a lot of nations and function a lot of languages, each language has its own history of formation and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia: Treatment of Ethnic Russians in Kalmykia and Availability of State Protection Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board, Ottawa
    Home > Research > Responses to Information Requests RESPONSES TO INFORMATION REQUESTS (RIRs) New Search | About RIR's | Help 8 December 2004 RUS43120.E Russia: Treatment of ethnic Russians in Kalmykia and availability of state protection Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board, Ottawa Information on the treatment of ethnic Russians in Kalmykia and availability of state protection was scarce among the sources consulted by the Research Directorate. However, the following information may be useful. Agence France Presse (AFP) reported on 27 June 2002 that the president of Kalmykia, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, "claim[ed] credit for ensuring peaceful relations among the ethnic Kalmyk, Russian Orthodox and Muslim communities." AFP added that towns and villages "are liberally dotted with portraits of Ilyumzhinov in the company of famous men," among which is Russian Orthodox patriarch Alexy II (Agence France Presse 27 June 2002). In a radio interview, the chairwoman of the Moscow Helsinki Group (MHG), Lyudmila Alekseyeva, stated that, after monitoring the situation in all of Russia's 89 regions she considered Kalmykia to be "among the champions" [i.e. the worst] with regards to human rights abuses (Radio Russia 4 July 2003). In 8 December 2004 correspondence with the Research Directorate, a lawyer working for the Moscow Helsinki Group (MHG) indicated that Kalmykia has a bad record for human rights. She also stated that violations of civil and political rights "do not discriminate [against] any group of population" and that they "cannot prove that ethnic Russians suffer from any kind of discrimination..." (8 Dec. 2004). In the weekly Moskovskiye Novosti, Lyudmila Alekseyeva of the MHG reported that her organization will "insist on bringing those guilty of beating up protesters in Kalmykia to account" (12 Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian Lessons Georgian Georgian Lessons Conflicting Russian and Western Interests
    Georgian Lessons Georgian Lessons Conflicting Russian and Western Interests in the Wider Europe A Report of the CSIS New European Democracies Project and the Lavrentis Lavrentiadis Chair in Southeast European Studies 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 author Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Janusz Bugajski E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org Bugajski November 2010 ISBN 978-0-89206-606-3 CSIS CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & Ë|xHSKITCy066063zv*:+:!:+:! CSIS INTERNATIONAL STUDIES Georgian Lessons Conflicting Russian and Western Interests in the Wider Europe A Report of the CSIS New European Democracies Project and the Lavrentis Lavrentiadis Chair in Southeast European Studies author Janusz Bugajski November 2010 About CSIS In an era of ever-changing global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and Inter- national Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and practical policy solutions to decisionmak- ers. CSIS conducts research and analysis and develops policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke at the height of the Cold War, CSIS was dedicated to the simple but urgent goal of finding ways for America to survive as a nation and prosper as a people. Since 1962, CSIS has grown to become one of the world’s preeminent public policy institutions. Today, CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. More than 220 full-time staff and a large network of affiliated scholars focus their expertise on defense and security; on the world’s regions and the unique challenges inherent to them; and on the issues that know no boundary in an increasingly connected world.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Russian Law on Religion: a View from the Regions
    DePaul Law Review Volume 49 Issue 1 Fall 1999 Article 4 The New Russian Law on Religion: A View from the Regions Michael Bourdeaux Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Recommended Citation Michael Bourdeaux, The New Russian Law on Religion: A View from the Regions, 49 DePaul L. Rev. 139 (1999) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol49/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NEW RUSSIAN LAW ON RELIGION: A VIEW FROM THE REGIONS* Michael Bourdeaux** I. INTRODUCTION The catastrophic experiment to forcibly impose "state atheism" (go- sateizm) in the Soviet Union lasted just seventy years. Until Lenin's first decree on the Separation of Church and State in January 1918,1 no government in history had sought to impose a system which re- jected all forms of religion. The Roman Empire debased the gods of mythology by decreeing that the ruler should be worshipped, but they never abolished the pantheon. The French Revolution was strongly anti-clerical, but Christian worship continued. "State atheism" had its ups and downs for seventy years in Russia, but continued as the domi- nant policy in one form or other until 1988. The advent of Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev as General Secretary of the Communist Party put an end to anti-religious notions three years into his rule.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Political and Cultural Trends on the Spread of Buddhism in Russia
    The Impact of Political and Cultural Trends on the Spread of Buddhism in Russia Daria Sucitta Mikheeva, Phramaha Somphong Khunakaro, Dr. International Buddhist Studies College (IBSC) Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, Thailand Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] Abstract Buddhism in Russia was known as a traditional religion of several ethnic minorities from the 17th century A.D. and since then has been infl uenced by complex cultural and political processes. Not least, religion in Buddhist regions and interest in Buddhism among people from non-Buddhist backgrounds throughout history was heavily infl uenced, if not defi ned, by the state. This article examines how Buddhism is represented within the framework of multi-ethnic and multi-confessional state, and which trends in cultural and political life had the major infl uence that shaped its modern appearance. While territorial expansion and political agenda in the East had encouraged oriental studies and brought fi rst research dedicated to the Buddhist teaching and culture, hardline anti-religious policy during the times of the Soviet Union led to suspension of Buddhism-related research and destruction of traditional Buddhist culture in the three Buddhist regions of Buryatia, Kalmykia and Tuva. For three decades now, the country is experiencing a period of religious revival, which involves not only traditional religions but a diversity of religious groups that historically have never existed within Russian borders. Keywords: Buddhism in Russia, Culture, Politics JIABU | Vol. 12 No.1 (January – June 2019) 143 The Diverse Representations of Buddhism in Contemporary Russia Diverse forms of Buddhism in modern Russia can be divided into two groups: 1) the traditional form of organized religious life – mainly in the republics of Buryatia, Tuva and Kalmykia – which is centered in the monasteries, and 2) small communities belonging to different Buddhist schools, whose activities are mainly based in non-Buddhist areas of Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Ethnic Separatism
    14 2.Ethnic Separatism Emil A. Payin* Background Although the Constitution of the Russian Federation does not mention special ethnic-territorial entities, such entities do exist.1 Autonomous republics, okrugs, and oblasts were formed and developed as expressions of political self- determination and ethnic self-defense by so-called “titular” nationalities (representatives of ethnic communities lending their names to the appropriate administrative units). Beginning in the late 1980s, titular nationalities became more concentrated in their respective “autonomies” as their share of the total population increased (exceptions are the Khakas, Mariyts, and Mordovian groups in the corresponding republics of Khakasia, Mari El, and Mordovia, and also some smaller indigenous ethnic groups in the autonomous okrugs of Siberia and the Far East).2 Parallel to this, the share of the “non-titular” population groups decreases, as does their number, while their migration from many republics increases. For the period between 1989-1994, the number of Russians decreased in such republics as Kalmykia, Adygeya, Karachaevo-Cherkessia (within 1 percent), Dagestan (3.5 percent), Buryatia (3 percent), Yakutia (more than 11 percent). Needless to say, the most significant reduction in the Russian population (by more than two-thirds) has taken place in the Chechen Republic.3 _________________ * The author is Advisor to the President of the Russian Federation on Nationality Problems, and Director of the Center for Ethnopolitical and Regional Research. 1 In Russia, 89 regions count as subjects of the federation. Each of these falls into one of two basic categories: 1) ethnic-territorial entities, 32 in total (21 republics, 10 autonomous okrugs, and 1 autonomous oblast); 2) administrative-territorial entities, 57 in total (these are the krais and oblasts, populated mostly by ethnic Russians, and the cities of Moscow and St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fourth State Report Submitted by the Russian Federation (ACFC/SR
    The fourth state report submitted by the Russian Federation (ACFC/SR/IV(2016)006) has been made public by the Council of Europe Secretariat in accordance with Article 20 of Resolution (97)10 on the monitoring arrangements under Articles 24-26 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities. The report has been prepared under the sole responsibility of the Russian Federation. Being committed under the relevant Committee of Ministers decisions (e.g. CM/Del/Dec(2014)1196/1.8, CM/Del/Dec(2014)1207/1.5, CM/Del/Dec(2015)1225/1.8) to uphold the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine, the Council of Europe does not recognise any alteration of status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the City of Sevastopol. ACFC/SR/IV(2016)006 ACFC/SR/IV(2016)006 Fourth Report submitted by the Russian Federation pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 2 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (Received on 20 December 2016) 2 ACFC/SR/IV(2016)006 Committee of Ministers Resolution(97)10 (17 September 1997), paragraph 20: “State reports shall be transmitted by the party to the Secretary General who will transmit them to the Committee of Ministers. The state reports shall be made public by the Council of Europe upon receipt by the Secertary General, without prejudice to the right of the state to make the report public at an earlier date”. ACFC/SR/IV(2016)006 FOURTH PERIODIC REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES FOURTH REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Moscow, 2016 4 ACFC/SR/IV(2016)006 CONTENTS SUMMARY OF THE REPORT.....................................................................................................................6 PREAMBLE 9 PART I.
    [Show full text]