DOCSLIB.ORG

Kankanthri Weeraratne Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kankanthri Weeraratne Thesis Host Preferences and Pathogenomics of Pseudomonas fuscovaginae in Australia Kankanthri Nirodha Sandeepani Weeraratne B.Sc. Agriculture (Hons.) A thesis submitted to Charles Sturt University, Australia for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2017 School of Agricultural and Wine Sciences Faculty of Science Charles Sturt University Table of Contents List of Figures .............................................................................................................. VII List of Tables .................................................................................................................. X Certificate of Authorship ............................................................................................ XII Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... XIII Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1. Introduction and Literature Review .......................................................... 6 1.1. Important bacterial diseases of rice ................................................................ 7 1.2. Sheath rot diseases of rice ................................................................................ 9 1.2.1. Symptoms and Diagnosis ............................................................................ 9 1.2.2. Diversity of causal organisms ................................................................... 10 1.2.3. Economic impact and global distribution of the disease ........................... 11 1.2.4. Control ...................................................................................................... 13 1.3. Burkholderia glumae ....................................................................................... 16 1.3.1. Characteristics ........................................................................................... 16 1.3.2. Symptoms and diagnosis ........................................................................... 17 1.3.3. Pathogenicity and virulence ...................................................................... 17 1.3.4. Host range ................................................................................................. 18 1.3.5. Control ...................................................................................................... 19 1.4. Acidovorax avenae ssp. avenae ....................................................................... 20 1.4.1. Characteristics ........................................................................................... 20 1.4.2. Symptoms and diagnosis ........................................................................... 20 1.4.3. Pathogenicity and virulence ...................................................................... 21 1.4.4. Host range ................................................................................................. 22 1.4.5. Control ...................................................................................................... 23 1.5. Pantoea ananatis ............................................................................................. 23 1.5.1. Characteristics ........................................................................................... 24 1.5.2. Symptoms and diagnosis ........................................................................... 24 1.5.3. Pathogenicity and virulence ...................................................................... 25 1.5.4. Host range ................................................................................................. 26 1.5.5. Control ...................................................................................................... 27 II 1.6. Pseudomonas fuscovaginae ............................................................................. 27 1.6.1. Classification and nomenclature ............................................................... 28 1.6.2. Morphological and physiological characteristics ...................................... 28 1.6.3. Disease symptoms and diagnostics ........................................................... 29 1.6.4. Epidemiology ............................................................................................ 30 1.6.5. Geographical distribution .......................................................................... 31 1.6.6. Genetic diversity ....................................................................................... 31 1.6.7. Pathogenicity and virulence ...................................................................... 32 1.6.8. Host range ................................................................................................. 36 1.6.9. Control ...................................................................................................... 37 1.6.10. P. fuscovaginae in Australia ..................................................................... 39 Chapter 2. Potential hosts of P. fuscovaginae strains isolated from rice in Australia and their host-pathogen interactions ........................................................................... 44 2.1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 44 2.1.1 Host range of P. fuscovaginae .................................................................. 44 2.1.2 The range of potential hosts for P. fuscovaginae in Australia .................. 45 2.1.3 Occurrence of P. fuscovaginae in rice cropping regions in Australia....... 47 2.1.4 Sources of host plant resistance to P. fuscovaginae .................................. 49 2.1.5 Techniques for screening of host plant resistance..................................... 52 2.2 Materials and Methods .................................................................................. 54 2.2.1 Strains of P. fuscovaginae ......................................................................... 54 2.2.2 Selection of cultivars ................................................................................. 57 2.2.3 Plant growth conditions ............................................................................ 62 2.2.4 Preparation of inoculum and inoculation techniques ................................ 62 2.2.5 Data collection .......................................................................................... 63 2.2.6 Data analysis ............................................................................................. 63 2.2.7 Survey of sheath brown rot disease ........................................................... 64 2.2.8 Preparation of plant samples collected during the survey ......................... 65 2.2.9 Use of Loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) technique........ 66 2.2.10 Isolation and screening of putative P. fuscovaginae from diseased plant samples ...................................................................................................... 67 2.3 Results .............................................................................................................. 67 2.3.1 Screening of existing collection of putative P. fuscovaginae isolates ...... 67 2.3.2 Response of rice cultivars to inoculation with P. fuscovaginae................ 73 2.3.3 Response of wheat cultivars to inoculation with P. fuscovaginae ............ 77 III 2.3.4 Response of durum-wheat cultivars to inoculation with P. fuscovaginae 84 2.3.5 Response of triticale cultivars to inoculation with P. fuscovaginae ......... 85 2.3.6 Response of barley cultivars to inoculation with P. fuscovaginae............ 87 2.3.7 Outcomes of the disease survey ................................................................ 88 2.3.8 Results of LAMP assay for detecting P. fuscovaginae under field conditions .................................................................................................. 90 2.3.9 Results of screening of bacteria isolated from diseased plant samples from the survey .................................................................................................. 90 2.3.10 Response of rice and wheat to inoculation with P. fuscovaginae strains isolated from wheat ................................................................................... 91 2.4 Discussion ........................................................................................................ 92 2.5 Conclusions ................................................................................................... 101 Chapter 3. Comparative genomics of P. fuscovaginae from a perspective of host- specificity .................................................................................................................. 103 3.1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 103 3.2. Materials and methods ................................................................................. 107 3.2.1. P. fuscovaginae genomes ........................................................................ 107 3.2.2. Whole genome comparisons ................................................................... 109 3.3. Results ............................................................................................................ 110 3.3.1. Rice NRPS I ............................................................................................ 114 3.3.2. Rice NRPS II ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rice Sheath Rot Pathogen Pseudomonas Fuscovaginae;
    Neuroscience Area - PhD course in MOLECULAR BIOLOGY The rice sheath rot pathogen Pseudomonas fuscovaginae; microbiome and cell-cell signalling studies Candidate: Supervisor: Samson Musonerimana Vittorio Venturi, PhD. Academic year 2019-2020 2 Abstract Rice sheath rot has been mainly associated with the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas fuscovaginae and in some cases to the fungal pathogen Sarocladium oryzae; it is yet unclear if they are part of a complex disease. In this thesis the bacterial and fungal community associated with rice sheath rot symptomatic and asymptomatic rice plants was determined/studied with the main aim to shed light on the pathogen(s) causing rice sheath rot. Three experimental work chapters are presented; the first concerns the pathobiome and microbiome performed on rice plant samples collected from different rice varieties in two locations (highland and lowland) in two rice-growing seasons (wet and dry season) in Burundi. The results have showed that in symptomatic samples the bacterial Pseudomonas genus was prevalent in highland in both rice-growing seasons and was not affected by rice plant varieties. Pseudomonas sequence reads displayed a significant high similarity to Pseudomonas fuscovaginae indicating that it is the causal agent of rice sheath rot as previously reported. The fungal Sarocladium genus was on the other hand prevalent in symptomatic samples in lowland only in the wet season; the sequence reads were most significantly similar to Sarocladium oryzae. These studies showed that plant microbiome analysis is a very useful approach in determining the microorganisms involved in a plant disease. The second experimental chapter presents the culturable microbiome on rice sheath asymptomatic samples from highland where P.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenotypic and Genetic Diversity of Pseudomonads
    PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC DIVERSITY OF PSEUDOMONADS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ROOTS OF FIELD-GROWN CANOLA A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Department of Applied Microbiology and Food Science University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Danielle Lynn Marie Hirkala © Copyright Danielle Lynn Marie Hirkala, November 2006. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Applied Microbiology and Food Science University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A8 i ABSTRACT Pseudomonads, particularly the fluorescent pseudomonads, are common rhizosphere bacteria accounting for a significant portion of the culturable rhizosphere bacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Microbial Ecology 80:15
    The following supplement accompanies the article Isolates as models to study bacterial ecophysiology and biogeochemistry Åke Hagström*, Farooq Azam, Carlo Berg, Ulla Li Zweifel *Corresponding author: [email protected] Aquatic Microbial Ecology 80: 15–27 (2017) Supplementary Materials & Methods The bacteria characterized in this study were collected from sites at three different sea areas; the Northern Baltic Sea (63°30’N, 19°48’E), Northwest Mediterranean Sea (43°41'N, 7°19'E) and Southern California Bight (32°53'N, 117°15'W). Seawater was spread onto Zobell agar plates or marine agar plates (DIFCO) and incubated at in situ temperature. Colonies were picked and plate- purified before being frozen in liquid medium with 20% glycerol. The collection represents aerobic heterotrophic bacteria from pelagic waters. Bacteria were grown in media according to their physiological needs of salinity. Isolates from the Baltic Sea were grown on Zobell media (ZoBELL, 1941) (800 ml filtered seawater from the Baltic, 200 ml Milli-Q water, 5g Bacto-peptone, 1g Bacto-yeast extract). Isolates from the Mediterranean Sea and the Southern California Bight were grown on marine agar or marine broth (DIFCO laboratories). The optimal temperature for growth was determined by growing each isolate in 4ml of appropriate media at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 50o C with gentle shaking. Growth was measured by an increase in absorbance at 550nm. Statistical analyses The influence of temperature, geographical origin and taxonomic affiliation on growth rates was assessed by a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in R (http://www.r-project.org/) and the “car” package.
    [Show full text]
  • Control of Phytopathogenic Microorganisms with Pseudomonas Sp. and Substances and Compositions Derived Therefrom
    (19) TZZ Z_Z_T (11) EP 2 820 140 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: A01N 63/02 (2006.01) A01N 37/06 (2006.01) 10.01.2018 Bulletin 2018/02 A01N 37/36 (2006.01) A01N 43/08 (2006.01) C12P 1/04 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 13754767.5 (86) International application number: (22) Date of filing: 27.02.2013 PCT/US2013/028112 (87) International publication number: WO 2013/130680 (06.09.2013 Gazette 2013/36) (54) CONTROL OF PHYTOPATHOGENIC MICROORGANISMS WITH PSEUDOMONAS SP. AND SUBSTANCES AND COMPOSITIONS DERIVED THEREFROM BEKÄMPFUNG VON PHYTOPATHOGENEN MIKROORGANISMEN MIT PSEUDOMONAS SP. SOWIE DARAUS HERGESTELLTE SUBSTANZEN UND ZUSAMMENSETZUNGEN RÉGULATION DE MICRO-ORGANISMES PHYTOPATHOGÈNES PAR PSEUDOMONAS SP. ET DES SUBSTANCES ET DES COMPOSITIONS OBTENUES À PARTIR DE CELLE-CI (84) Designated Contracting States: • O. COUILLEROT ET AL: "Pseudomonas AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB fluorescens and closely-related fluorescent GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO pseudomonads as biocontrol agents of PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR soil-borne phytopathogens", LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, vol. 48, no. 5, 1 May (30) Priority: 28.02.2012 US 201261604507 P 2009 (2009-05-01), pages 505-512, XP55202836, 30.07.2012 US 201261670624 P ISSN: 0266-8254, DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02566.x (43) Date of publication of application: • GUANPENG GAO ET AL: "Effect of Biocontrol 07.01.2015 Bulletin 2015/02 Agent Pseudomonas fluorescens 2P24 on Soil Fungal Community in Cucumber Rhizosphere (73) Proprietor: Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Organization of the Quorum Sensing Luxi/R Family Genes in Burkholderia
    Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 13727-13747; doi:10.3390/ijms140713727 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Molecular Sciences ISSN 1422-0067 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Article The Organization of the Quorum Sensing luxI/R Family Genes in Burkholderia Kumari Sonal Choudhary 1, Sanjarbek Hudaiberdiev 1, Zsolt Gelencsér 2, Bruna Gonçalves Coutinho 1,3, Vittorio Venturi 1,* and Sándor Pongor 1,2,* 1 International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Padriciano 99, Trieste 32149, Italy; E-Mails: [email protected] (K.S.C.); [email protected] (S.H.); [email protected] (B.G.C.) 2 Faculty of Information Technology, PázmányPéter Catholic University, Práter u. 50/a, Budapest 1083, Hungary; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 The Capes Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Cx postal 250, Brasilia, DF 70.040-020, Brazil * Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: [email protected] (V.V.); [email protected] (S.P.); Tel.: +39-40-375-7300 (S.P.); Fax: +39-40-226-555 (S.P.). Received: 30 May 2013; in revised form: 20 June 2013 / Accepted: 24 June 2013 / Published: 2 July 2013 Abstract: Members of the Burkholderia genus of Proteobacteria are capable of living freely in the environment and can also colonize human, animal and plant hosts. Certain members are considered to be clinically important from both medical and veterinary perspectives and furthermore may be important modulators of the rhizosphere. Quorum sensing via N-acyl homoserine lactone signals (AHL QS) is present in almost all Burkholderia species and is thought to play important roles in lifestyle changes such as colonization and niche invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Pantoea Spp: a New Bacterial Threat to Rice Production in Sub-Saharan Africa
    Pantoea spp : a new bacterial threat to rice production in sub-Saharan Africa Kossi Kini To cite this version: Kossi Kini. Pantoea spp : a new bacterial threat to rice production in sub-Saharan Africa. Botan- ics. Université Montpellier; AfricaRice (Abidjan), 2018. English. NNT : 2018MONTG015. tel- 02868182v2 HAL Id: tel-02868182 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02868182v2 Submitted on 16 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE POUR OBTENIR LE GRADE DE DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE M ONTPELLIER En ÉVOLUTION DES SYSTÈMES INFECTIEUX École doctorale GAIA (N°584) Unité Mixte de recherche IPME Interactions Plantes-Microorganismes-Environnement (IRD, CIRAD, UM) Pantoea spp: a new bacterial threat for rice production in sub-Saharan Africa. Présentée par par Kossi KINI Le 22 Mai 2018 Sous la direction de Ralf KOEBNIK et Drissa SILUÉ Devant le jury composé de : RAPPORT DE GESTION Ralf KOEBNIK, Directeur de Recherche, IRD Directeur de thèse 2015 Drissa SILUÉ, Chargé de Recherche, AfricaRice Co directeur de thèse Claude BRAGARD, Professeur des Universités, UCL Rapporteur Marie-Agnès JACQUES, Directrice de Recherche, INRA Présidente du jury Monique ROYER, Cadre Scientifique, CIRAD Examinatrice Alice BOULANGER, Directrice de Recherche, INRA Examinatrice Kossi KINI PhD manuscript 22/05/2018 i Kossi KINI PhD manuscript 22/05/2018 Résumé Parmi les 24 espèces de Pantoea décrites jusqu'à présent, cinq ont été signalées jusqu'à 46 fois dans 21 pays comme phytopathogènes d'au moins 31 cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive List of Names of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, 1980-2007
    001_JPP_Letter_551 16-11-2010 14:12 Pagina 551 Journal of Plant Pathology (2010), 92 (3), 551-592 Edizioni ETS Pisa, 2010 551 LETTER TO THE EDITOR COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF NAMES OF PLANT PATHOGENIC BACTERIA, 1980-2007 C.T. Bull1, S.H. De Boer2, T.P. Denny3, G. Firrao4, M. Fischer-Le Saux5, G.S. Saddler6, M. Scortichini7, D.E. Stead8 and Y. Takikawa9 1United States Department of Agriculture, 1636 E. Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93905, USA 2Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 93 Mount Edward Road, Charlottetown, PE C1A 5T1, Canada 3University of Georgia, Plant Pathology Department, Plant Science Building, Athens, GA 30602-7274, USA 4Dipartimento di Biologia Applicata alla Difesa delle Piante, Università degli Studi, Via Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy 5UMR de Pathologie Végétale, INRA, BP 60057, 49071 Beaucouzé Cedex, France 6Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture, Roddinglaw Road, Edinburgh EH12 9FJ, UK 7CRA. Centro di Ricerca per la Frutticoltura, Via di Fioranello 52, 00134 Roma, Italy 8Food and Environment Research Agency, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ, UK 9Faculty of Agriculture, Shizuoka University, 836 Ohya, Shizuoka 422-8529, Japan SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The names of all plant pathogenic bacteria which The nomenclature of bacterial plant pathogens, like have been effectively and validly published in terms of that of many other life forms, is constantly changing in the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria and response to new insights and our understanding of rela- the Standards for Naming Pathovars are listed to pro- tionships among bacteria. For example, the taxonomy vide an authoritative register of names for use by au- of the family Enterobacteriaceae has been extensively re- thors, journal editors and others who require access to vised since the publication of the previous comprehen- currently correct nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Bacterial Pathogens Causing Panicle Blight of Rice In
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2004 Identification of bacterial pathogens causing panicle blight of rice in Louisiana Xianglong Yuan Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Yuan, Xianglong, "Identification of bacterial pathogens causing panicle blight of rice in Louisiana" (2004). LSU Master's Theses. 2883. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2883 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IDENTIFICATION OF BACTERIAL PATHOGENS CAUSING PANICLE BLIGHT OF RICE IN LOUISIANA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science In The Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology By Xianglong Yuan B.S., University of Liaoning, 1985 M.S., Shenyang Agriculture University, 1990 May 2004 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincerest gratitude to Dr. M. C. Rush, my advisor, for giving me this opportunity to pursue my graduate studies in the Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology at Louisiana State University. It was Dr. Rush that led me to enter the world of plant pathology, widening my field of vision in academia. I sincerely appreciate his guidance, advice, understanding, and patience throughout my time of study here, particularly in the research work and writing.
    [Show full text]